วีดีโอ

ബർ, ഞാൻ ബഹുമാനിക്കുന്ന ഒരു മഹത് വ്യക്തിയാണ് താങ്കൾ . പറഞ്ഞതൊക്കെ ശരിയാണ് എന്ന അഭിപ്രായവും എനിക്കുണ്ട്. പക്ഷെ, സർ, രാജാക്കന്മാരും ചക്രവർത്തിമാരും ധനനമ്പാദനത്തിനും അതിർത്തി വ്യാപനത്തിനു മാണ് യുദ്ധം ചെയ്തിരുന്നത് എന്നത് അർദ്ധസത്യമായി ശേഷിക്കുന്നു. അതിൽ മുസ്ലീം ആക്രമണകാരികൾ ആക്രമണം നടത്തിയിരുന്നത് കൊള്ളയ്ക്കുമപ്പുറം മതപരിവർത്തനത്തിന് കൂടി യായിരുന്നു. അവിടെയാണ് പിഴവുകളുണ്ടായത് സർ

Well said. ....

Secularism through jihad

How can you say Muslim kings intention was to rob temple only, then why did they demolish and built new Mosque on its top?

As long as Hindus are majorly, India would be secular and once Hindus become minority, India going to be religious country

നെഹ്‌റുവും പൂർണ്ണ മതേതരനായിരുന്നുവോ? ഹിന്ദുകോഡ് ബില്ലിനുശേഷം ഇസ്‌ലാമിനെസംബന്ധിക്കുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങളിലും മാറ്റം വരുത്തുവാൻ എന്തെങ്കിലും ശ്രമം അദ്ദേഹം നടത്തിയോ? സ്വാതന്ത്രാനന്തരം നടന്ന ഇന്ത്യാ-പാക്ക് യുദ്ധത്തിൽ പൊടുന്നനെ വെടി നിറുത്തൽ പ്രഖ്യാപിച്ചത്‌ തന്നെ കാശ്മീരിന്റെ ഒരു ഭാഗം പാക്കിസ്ഥാനോടൊപ്പം നിൽക്കണമെന്ന് കരുതിയല്ലേ? കൂടാതെ കാശ്മീർ പ്രശ്നം യുഎന്നിലേക്കും വിട്ടുകൊടുത്തു. ഖുറാനും ആയത്തുകളും ഹദീസുകളുമെല്ലാം പഠിച്ചു വളർന്നവർ തന്നെയാണല്ലോ ഗോറിയും, ഗസ്നിയും ലോദിയും ബാബറുമെല്ലാം. കൊള്ളയും വെട്ടിപ്പിടുത്തങ്ങളും നടത്തുന്നതിനോടൊപ്പം മതവും കൂടിവളർത്തിയാലേ മരണാനന്തരം സ്വർഗവും, മദ്യപ്പുഴയും 72 - ഹൂറിമാരേയും കിട്ടുകയുള്ളൂവെന്ന് വിശ്വസിച്ചിരുന്നവർ തന്നെയായിരുന്നു ഇസ്ലാമിക ആക്രമകാരികൾ. മതത്തിനു കീഴ്പെടാത്തവർക്ക് ജസിയ യും ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നുവല്ലോ? അലക്സാണ്ടർ ചക്രവർത്തി നിരവധി രാജ്യങ്ങൾ കീഴടക്കിയെങ്കിലും തന്റെ മതത്തിലേക്ക് ആളുകളെ ചേർത്തതായി കാണുന്നില്ല. ഡച്ച്, പോർട്ടുഗീസ്, ഇംഗ്ലീഷ്കാർ തുടങ്ങിയവർ ലോകത്ത് പലയിടത്തും കോളനികൾ സ്ഥാപിച്ചെങ്കിലും മതം വളർത്തൽ അല്ലായിരുന്നു അവരുടെ ലക്ഷ്യങ്ങൾ. ഇന്ത്യയ്ക്കകത്തും രാജാക്കന്മാർ പരസ്പരം പോരടിച്ചിട്ടുണ്ട്. അതൊന്നും മതം വളർത്തുവാൻ വേണ്ടിയായി രുന്നില്ല. കലിംഗയുദ്ധത്തിന്റെ വിജയത്തിനുശേഷമാണ് മാനസാന്തരപ്പെട്ട് അശോകൻ ബുദ്ധമതം സ്വീകരിച്ചതും. കലിംഗായുദ്ധവും മതപ്രചരണത്തിനു വേണ്ടിയായിരുന്നില്ല. ഖുറാൻ ആവശ്യപ്പെടുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങൾക്കു കൂടിയായിരുന്നു ഇസ്ലാമിക രാജാക്കന്മാർ യുദ്ധം ചെയ്തിരുന്നത്. വിദ്യാഭ്യാസത്തിനൊപ്പം മതപ്രചരണവും കൂടി ലക്ഷ്യംവയ്ക്കുന്നതു കൊണ്ടല്ലേ വിവാദ നിസ്ക്കാര പ്രശ്നങ്ങൾ പോലും കേരളത്തിൽ ഉണ്ടാകുന്നതെന്നു പോലും സംശയീക്കേണ്ടേ? .

പൊളിറ്റിക്കൽ മതവും പൊളിറ്റിക്കൽ അല്ലാത്ത മതവും ഉണ്ടോ? ഉണ്ടെങ്കിൽ when and why ?

കൊള്ളക്കാരുടെ.....സംസ്കാരവും.......കൊള്ളയടിക്കപ്പെടാൻ...വിധിക്കപ്പെട്ടവരുടെ....സംസ്കാരവും .......ഒരേ അതിർത്തിക്കുള്ളിൽ...സാദ്ധ്യമാക്കുന്ന ആ മാജിക്ക്.... ആരെങ്കിലും.. ഒന്നു വിശദീകരിക്കാമോ......😢😢😢

Right to Freedom of Religion (Q-2) Give your views on the Right to Freedom of Religion as enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Do they make India a Secular State ? [ IAS-2005 ASKED QUESTION ] The term ‘Secular’ was added to the Preamble by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976.The Indian Constitution presents the positive concept of Secularism.That means, the all religions are placing in the same status. It accesses equal support from the state through the preparations in the Article from the Article 25 to the Article 28 in the Part 3rd of the Constitution. The Indian Constitution gives the guarantees for the Right to Freedom of Religion to all Indians. Especially, it guarantees to individuals and religious groups in India. Its Articles are Articles-25 , Article- 26, Article- 27 and Article-28. Freedom of religion in India is a fundamental right. In 1947, the modern India came into existence.Also, the Indian constitution's preamble was amended in 1976. Thus, India became a secular state and approved the Indian Constitution. From that approval time, our Supreme Court of India judged that India was already a secular state.Through this amendment, Articles 25, 26,27,28 clearly explained about the Freedom of Religions. Every Indian citizen has a right to practice and promote their religion peacefully. But, numerous incidents of religious intolerance, riots and violence happened in India. Some examples are 1984 Anti-Sikh Massacre in Delhi, 1990 Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus from Kashmir, 1992-93 Bombay Riots in Mumbai, the 2008 Anti-Christian riots in Odisha etc. The meaning of the word ‘secularism’ is separate from religion. In short notes: Article-25 says that all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion.Article-26 says that every religious denomination or any of its section has right to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purpose and manage its own affairs in matter of religion. Article-27 ensures that no persons shall be compelled to pay any taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination. Article-28 says that no religious instruction shall be provided in an educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds. Constitutional Values : 1) India has no State Religion. 2)State does not discriminate between religions. 3)State can not impose any tax to promote a religion or to maintain religious institutions 4)Religious instructions can not be imparted in educational institutions run by state funds. 5) In educational institutions recognized by the State, religious instructions can not be compulsorily given to unwilling students.

Right to Equality in the Constitutions of the USA (Q-4). Analyze the distinguishing features of the notion of Right to Equality in the Constitutions of the USA and India. (250 Words) ( IAS MAINS ASKED ON 20/ 5/ 2022 ) Introduction: On the basis of Federalism in political structure, both the United States and India are the largest democratic countries in the world. Where the individuals in society are treated equally and without discrimination, their Democracy can only thrive and flourished. So, it was necessary to include some provisions in the Constitution to remove the hurdle of existing social and economic inequalities. Also, need to enable the diverse communities to enjoy the rights and liberties guaranteed under the Constitution. Body : The right to equality is given below : On the basis of caste, race, religion, sex, and place of birth; abolition of legal discrimination is required. Also, secure the equal rights to all Citizens.This is called the Right to Equality. Right to Equality in India: In India, in chapter-III, “Fundamental Rights” was added in the Constitution by the Constituent Assembly. The Indian Constitution follows both the British and USA model. That means, the Indian Constitution follows the British model of ‘Equality before Law' and American model of ‘equal protection of law’ included in Article 14. It also gives for both civil-legal and socio-economic equality and highlights substantive equality. To secure equality, the Constitution also gives for affirmative action.It is included in the Article-16. It concentrates on securing equality of results along with equality of opportunity. The right also bans discrimination and stops untouchability through the Article 17. Right to Equality in the US: Here, the original Constitution did not prevent discrimination. From the Declaration of Rights and the Bill of Rights, the US derived the Right to Equality. Through the fourteenth Amendment in 1868, it was inserted in the Bill of Rights. The US follows the concept of ‘equal protection of law’ and highlights equal treatment under equal circumstances. The right mainly emphasizes civil and legal equality. . Conclusion : The Right to Equality is calculated as a basic feature of both the Constitutions. To develop our Country, some division of people’s upliftment is necessary. People commonly think of it. In this type of society, it plays a key role in achieving social and economic justice in our society .By providing equal opportunities and treatment to all, it emphasizes the fundamental unity of individuals.

IV)Another Person’s Opinion About the Indian Constitution’s Review. Does the Indian Constitution Need to be Amended? ( IAS 2006 ASKED QUESTION ) Now, over seventy years of Parliamentary democracy in India, people have lost faith in it. The victim of Democracy is Politics. In India, if we want the people to vote for an institution that has maintained some level of integrity, they would vote for the Supreme Court, Election Commission or to the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. Their final preference would be Parliament or State Assemblies. In the parliamentary democracy, the people need responsible leaders and are conscious of their duties, response to the public opinion and stable democracy.If the above mentioned qualities are absent in the political leaders, the democracy should not be stabled. If the will of the people starts to be ignored, the government will become dictatorial. In India, politicians are looked upon with hatred. Because, the elected politicians become the misuse and mediators of power. The Indian Constitution promised the realization of social and economic justice. Even now it remains a dream only. Also, the system of administration has reduced and limited the sovereignty of the people. It was reduced to a mere right to exercise their franchise at elections. Unimaginative and indifferent administration, gloomy , harsh etc., have affected the poor to their core. Corruption, inefficiency and insensitivity has eaten the poor people’s living standards. Moreover, the distribution of goods has given rise to extra-legal systems. Now the people in India are more divided than at the time of the country’s independence. The national political parties are rarely followed for Common national purposes. Noble purposes of public life are competitive personal gains and opportunism. And also its self searching has declined politically. We feel that the Corruption has been legalized, particularly in political life. Electoral reforms, reforming of the political parties, their internal democracy etc. are essential parts of reform. Friendship of the political employees spoiled the administrative belief. Unprincipled, opportunistic political re-arrangements , defections and re-defections minimize the scope of the stability of the governments. The instability of the governments caused the rise of maladministration. It paralyzed the creative energies of the people. Now in the present situation, our foremost requirement is the restoration of confidence in the institutions of democracy. The fulfillment of People’s and the County's needs are very essential. For that we need strong and enlightened leadership to address the emergent problems of divergent nature. Besides the politicians, bureaucrats and criminals; the voters are also responsible, to some extent, for the prevailing situation. Because, they do not carry out their civic duty honestly. In the election procedure, there is violence and money influence. It threatens the very survival of the democratic system. Besides the frustration from the political and administrative side and the failure and collapse of the judicial trial system sometimes happens. The delays of the cases and mounting costs of the cases have kept the general people away from justice. This causes frustration and blocks their aspirations. The percentage of cases that go through the whole process in courts is quite large.So, for this another way should be enquired urgently. The frustration is increasing about Justice in the electoral process. Corruption and criminalization has over-covered its processes. Over expenses of the elections caused to avoid the original proper candidates. It led to the degradation of political processes to do the Common goodness. For meeting electoral expenditure, Political parties collect enormous funds from criminals and capitalists. Through this, in public life, it causes pervasive degeneracy. It reflects the Government’s standards and their administrations.Some members of the Parliament indicated these types of administrative failure in the Assembly and the Parliament. In 1948, November 5th the CA member Dhamodhar Swaroop Seth also opinionated this same discussion in the Parliament. At the same date, in November 5th 1948, HV Kamath said that to calculate the use of the administration, the evaluation of the administrative progress of the common people’s welfare is essential. To be solved the final contradiction is this. To be understood for , is Individual for the Government or Government for the individual. Nazeeruddin Ahammad from West Bengal said that, the Directive Principles Of State Policy is from the Article-28 to the Article-48 and it should be the devotional words is my assumption. The Country is suffering more pain in the Reservations and in the Minorities in this period too. In the Constitution Assembly, United Nation General Krishnachandra Sarmma said this. Our Minority people are really not minorities. Because, we have been living in the Country from centuries to centuries, loving each other. We have a common Culture, common living procedure, and common thinking procedure. So, in Chapter XIV of the Indian Constitution, why is this peculiar minority status given? I can not understand it. Said Krishnachandra Sarmma. Without considering the caste or religion or minority status, there is no problem that economically backward people get the reservation. The nature of the Indian Constitution is not Indian. The Indian Constitution depends on the Government of India Act-1935. It is written by Brittain.That means, the Indian Constitution is copied mostly from Britain including the US Constitution. From Ireland, Australia, Canada, Japan ,Germany (Weimar), Soviet Union (USSR) (now, Russia), U.K, South Africa, France we borrowed some Articles to frame our Indian Constitution. Reason for the unmatching of the nature of the Indian Constitution, there happened the amendment above 110 times with in 70 years. On the other hand, the Constitution of the United States was presented on 17th September 1787.With in the period above 230 years, only eleven articles have so far been amended twenty seven times only in the US. This comparison speaks volume of the mismatch of the Constitution with the Indian condition. So, Review of the Indian Constitution is very urgent. In 1951, the first amendment of the Indian Constitution happened. From 1950 to 1967, the Parliament and most of the state assemblies were under the rule of the Congress Party. But after 1967 non-congress coalitions took over the administration in several northern states. During this period several issues were raised about union-state relations. In the period after the fourth General Election, unprincipled defections became widespread. In 1967, December 8th, this subject was discussed in the Lok Sabha. After their discussion, Home Minister YB Chavan formed a committee to solve the unprincipled defections. And solved it. So on 27- October 1976 the 42nd Amendment Bill was presented in the Lok Sabha with a long speech of the Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Thus, finally the Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha with 4 against it and 366 in favor. And the Rajya Sabha passed by 190 Votes in its favor and none against it. The amendment led to imposition of Emergency in the country. It was a dark period of Indian democracy. Whatever may be, the above mentioned incidents show some defects of the Indian Constitution. To solve these defects, our Constitution Review is required.

III)Another Person’s Opinion About the Indian Constitution’s Review. Does the Indian Constitution Need to be Amended? ( IAS 2006 ASKED QUESTION ) The Indian Constitution is the finest constitutional document in the world. yet it has undergone 105 amendments till today, 2024. Yet, any hint of a review provokes outrage particularly from liberals.So, they fear that this will lead to the diminishing of India’s democracy and the dismantling of its parliamentary system. In this situation, Bibek Debroy suggested in his Column to need a new Constitution for India. Bibek Debroy is Chairman of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Economic Advisory Council. When he uttered these words, the hornet’s nest stirred. PM Modi Govt. realized its political damage and swiftly distanced itself from his assertion.Because, the elections are just a few months away. Government critics also refused the argument of Debroy. Some people smelled a conspiracy. And the Hindutva organizations expressed their objections from the beginning period of free India’s ruling. When the Constitution was adopted on January 26, 1950, Hindutva organizations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Hindu Maha Sabha had opposed this Indian Constitution. They said that this Constitution did not have an Indian soul as it had borrowed Western concepts verbatim. But most of the people opinionated that the time is exceeded for a critical assessment of the constitution and if needed, amendments should be made. Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar, India's first law minister, assessed profoundly about the Constitution. So he said that “India must strive to be a social democracy and not merely a political democracy.” His meaning about social democracy is that “a way of life which recognizes liberty, equality and fraternity as the principles of life.” Ambedkar was a rationalist. He was not blinded by faith of any kind. In 1953 he realized the practical inadequacies of the constitution. So, he definitely thought that the constitution could have been better. He did not refuse the constitution. But he was searching for perfection of the Constitution. He has the thought of the imperfections and weakness of Indian society in the ultra-modern constitution. After creating a masterpiece, he finds too many faults in his creation. But, the highest officers of the Constitutional positions, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar and former Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi raised the Doubt about the basic structure of the Constitution. And they questioned its existence. And finally, a way should be found to make India a social democracy. Ambedkar had said that “without social democracy, India could become a dictatorship.”The Indian Constitution framers created a parliamentary system of government with checks and balances. If one individual should become so powerful. Then that person should think that he/she is above the law. And other institutions will serve his/her interest. To avoid and to abolish such types of thinked individual’s Power our Constitution framers adopted the concept of separation of powers.According to my concept, attaining of the absolute majority in the lower house is better to healthy rule to the country. For example, Indira Gandhi’s ruling was better than Manmohan Singh. Because Manmohan Sing was a weak prime minister. IV)Another Person’s Opinion About the Indian Constitution’s Review.

II)[According to opinion of some another persons about the Constitution Review] (Q-5)Do You Think There is a Need for a Review of the Indian Constitution? (IAS-2008 ASKED QUESTION) The Indian Constitution has been operating since 1947. In the social, economic and political developments, there created new trends, tension and issues. To address this, a review of the aspects relating to Union-State relations made by the commissions on Centre State Relation is required. . Besides, a healthy democratic debate on the Indian Constitution is needed. Now the people feel that this strongly discussed argumental review is required. Indian Constitution : In the calculation of such a requirement, in 2000, the Union Government passed the resolution to form a National Commission to Review the working of the Constitution. The setting up of the commission suggests one thing is given below. After so many years of working on the Constitution, time is ripe enough to restructure the Constitution to suit the needs of the administration by a welfare state.The restructuring of the Constitution should be made according to evolve with the time. It is quite justified. Because the Constitution is a guideline for the government. So, it must be equipped to deal with changing needs of the time and to refine the existing features of the Constitution. That means, to put it briefly, it must be equipped to make it best suited. Elections in the world's largest democracy is India. Related to its election, there are some issues that arise. Criminalization of political practices and lack of transparency related to the election made the growing corruption in administration.The following given reasons are the growing corruption in administration. The absence of legal instrumentalities or set of laws regulating the conduct of the political parties, legitimacy of fund-making, audit, account requirements and inner-party democracy are the reasons for growing corruption in administration. Here, there are over 260 million people living below the poverty line. These people are suffering from many issues of economic failure. The issues of economic failure stirred their basic existence. The inefficiency and non-account ability of the administrative system is prevent the smooth functioning of the administrative system. These types of administrators and Constitutional protection for the service under Article 311 has largely been exploited by dishonest officials. Moreover, both in the civil and criminal cases, the judiciary is identified by delay in the trial system. If these are just a few inadequacies, it adversely hampered the unity and integrity of the Indian. However, it justified a review of the Indian Constitution. III)Another Person’s Opinion About the Indian Constitution’s Review.

Indian Constitution Review I )(Q-5) Do you think there is a need for a review of the Indian Constitution? (IAS-2008 ASKED QUESTION) Is the Need for a Review of the Indian Constitution required or not ? According to the opinion of some persons about the need for a review of the Indian Constitution . On 26th January 1950, the Indian Constitution was approved and it is the supreme law of the country. It was established through the following ways. It lays down the framework. This framework defines the political principles, establishes the structure, procedures, powers with duties of the government institutions, sets out the fundamental rights, directive principles, responsibilities of citizens etc. But, over the years, people are crying loudly to review the Indian Constitution due to various reasons. 1. Changing Social Dynamics : After approving the Constitution, the Indian society has significant changes happened. There are some certain provisions of the Indian Constitution necessary to relook. Which are them? They are the advent of globalization, technological advancements and evolving social norms. Rights, privacy laws, women's rights etc. required to be addressed in the context of modern society. 2. Economic Challenges: After Indian independence India has witnessed tremendous economic growth. Also, the Constitution needs to match the changing economic landscape. Some areas are required to review. The government's role in economic matters, the balance between private enterprise and welfare programs, the need for sustainable development etc. are areas that require review. 3. Strengthening Federalism: India is a federal country. The extension of the sharing of power between the central and state governments has been debated. A review of the Constitution can help to solve some doubts. To ensure a more harmonious relationship between the center and states, fiscal federalism, inter-state disputes and the distribution of powers are required to solve the related doubts.To solve these doubts, review of the Constitution is required. 4. Administrative Reforms: For the smooth functioning of any country, the efficiency and effectiveness of the administrative machinery are crucial. To face the administrative challenges, streamline bureaucracy and enhance governance mechanisms to better serve the needs of the people; a review of the Constitution can provide an opportunity. 5. Judicial Reforms: To uphold the rule of law and protect citizens' rights, the Indian judiciary plays a crucial role. But, about the increasing cases, delays in justice delivery, and the need for judicial accountability; there are some doubts. To solve these problems, and strengthen the judicial system; a review of the Constitution can help. 6. Inclusivity and Representation: With multiple ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups, India is a diverse country. In the political system, there have been demands for better representation and inclusivity. Marginalized communities, women and other underrepresented groups need to ensure adequate representation. To secure it a review of the Constitution can provide an opportunity. Conclusion: Based on the changing times, the Indian Constitution is a living document. To address the challenges and aspirations of a dynamic society, strengthen democratic institutions and ensure security, the Constitution remains a true reflection of the values and aspirations of the Indian people. ...................

Key Phrases in the Preamble : In the Preamble, it included several crucial terms.For example some crucial terms are We, the People of India …….. This phrase emphasizes that the Constitution is grounded in the authority of the people of India. The Constitution of India is crafted by representatives elected by the people. The Indian Constitution is framed and created or crafted by the representatives elected by the people. 1.Sovereignty : The sovereignty word denotes supremacy or independence. India has internal and external sovereignty. India enjoys external autonomy, free from the influence of foreign powers. Internally, the People are choosing a self-governing body directly. It is responsible for crafting and implementing laws that shape the nation. In it , the People boast proudly. The Indian Constitution’s fundamental component is the principle of popular sovereignty. Consequently, the Indian citizens involve sovereign power. They are using their rights to elect representatives in elections spanning Parliament, State Legislature, and Local Bodies. In the Constitution of Ireland, we can find the term “sovereign” as its origin. It symbolizes India’s independence. Joining the Commonwealth and UNO does not impose any restrictions on India’s sovereignty. 2.Socialist : We know that, in 1976 , the 42nd Amendment was done to involve the term “Socialist” in the Preamble. Thus the term “Socialist” is involved in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution through the 42nd Amendment. Because, India’s commitment is always pointing to Socialism. An integral part of the constitutional framework is the income redistribution and poverty reduction. Thus the Socialist ideology advocates for income redistribution and poverty reduction. India embraces to democratic socialism. How? Through a mixed economy with both private and public sectors coexisting, India embraces the democratic Socialism. Indian Socialism is rooted in Marxism and Gandhism. Through promoting social and economic equality, Indian socialism leans towards Gandhian principles. 3.Social and Economic Equality In some Countries, the people are showing and doing discrimination based on caste, color, creed, sex, religion, or language. But Social Equality implies the absence of these discriminations. So, in India through Social Equality, it ensures equal status and opportunities for everyone. Achievement of Equitable wealth distribution and a decent standard of living for all is indicating Economic Equality. To get these Economic Equality to all, the state’s effort is essential. In India, the Government’s action for the Economic Equality to all is indicated in the Preamble. To fulfill the goals of a welfare state, well prepared legislative activities are essential. By these legislative activities, the receiving of India’s socialistic and mixed economic system is reinforcing. 4.Secular Secularity is emphasizing the equality of all religions and promoting religious tolerance. The term “Secular” was incorporated into the Preamble through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976. When compared to India with the West, Secularism takes on a distinct meaning. There it denotes a complete separation between the state and religion. In India, secularism indicates the state’s impartiality towards all religions. The Government will not approve or favor any peculiar religion or belief. With no official state religion, the Government is ensuring religious freedom and worship for all.The state has this commitment. Every individual has the right to practice, preach, and propagate their chosen religion. Freedom of Religion protects as a fundamental right. Through the Articles 25 to 28, the Constitution holds supremacy over religious scriptures. All citizens are equal before the law, and government schools refrain from imparting religious instruction. The Government never considers the Citizen’s religious beliefs. Secularism is an integral part of the Constitution’s basic structure. The Supreme Court affirmed in SR Bommai v/s Union of India Case in 1994. 5. Democratic Essence The Preamble begins with “We, The People” and concludes with “give to ourselves this Constitution,” It distinctly reflects India’s democratic spirit. In the Indian democratic process, through universal adult suffrage, there involves the election of governments at various levels.That various levels are Union, State, and Local. India practices representative democracy. This representative democracy involves political democracy with social and economic democracy. At present, there exist two primary forms of democracy. They are direct and indirect democracy. (Not finished ; will continue the Remaining part again)

Preamble (Q-6) What is the significance of a Preamble to a Constitution? Bring out the philosophy of the Indian Polity as enshrined in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution? ( IAS-2004 ASKED QUESTION) The Preamble of the Indian Constitution sets out the guiding suggestions, principles and the aims of the documents. It indicates the source which derives its authority, meaning and the people. The Preamble draws its foundation from the Objectives Resolution. Jawaharlal Nehru moved this foundation of the preamble in the Constituent Assembly on 13 / 12 / 1946 and it adopted on 22 / 1 /1947. Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru said that ‘’ We took pledge long years ago to achieve Purna Swaraj’’ and we have achieved it. But, the initial draft of the Preamble was composed by BN Rau. He was the constitutional advisor to the Constituent Assembly. The passage of the Indian independence Act was done in 1947.Till this date, India was an independence colony of the British Empire. From 15 / 8 / 1947 to 26 / 1 / 1950, the political status of India was in the dominion of the British Commonwealth Nations. India stopped being a British dominion on 26 / 1 / 1950 and declared as a Sovereign Republic. Whatever may be, Pakistan continued in the British dominion till 1956. On 26 / 11 / 1949, the Constituent Assembly of India approved the Preamble and came into effect on 26th January 1950. To see India as an independent, sovereign and republic, the Preamble shows at first by the Constituent Assembly of India.The preamble is the soul and backbone of the Indian Constitution and it serves as the foundational statement. In essence, the Preamble outlines the fundamental values, goals, and principles. It underpin the legal framework. It often serves as a compass for understanding the total objectives of the legal system. Also, it serves as giving insight into the spirit and intent behind the subsequent articles or provisions, and a touchstone for the interpretation and application of the law. NA Palkhivala’s Preamble is called the “Identity Card of the Constitution”. It was derived from the American Constitution and influenced by the language of the Australian Constitution. Here, NA Palkhivala is a distinguished jurist and constitutional expert. In 1995, a case of Union Government v/s Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India was filed in the Supreme Court. The Case has more significance.In this Case, Court said that the Preamble is the integral part of the Indian Constitution.But, it is not directly enforceable in a court of justice in India. Alladi Krishnaswamy lyer was the Chairman of the Constituent Assembly. He said that the Preamble is the embodiment of the long period dreams. Also he insisted about the importance of the idea of the formation of the Constitution. Similarly, KM Munshi described that the Preamble is the “future and birth certificate” of the Sovereign Democratic Republic..............

Preamble - Text We, the people of India, solemnly resolve to establish India as a Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic Republic, committed to ensuring justice-social, economic, and political; liberty-of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship; equality-of status and opportunity; and to promote among them all fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation. On 26/11/1949, in our Constituent Assembly, we adopted, enacted, and gave to ourselves this Constitution. The Preamble draws its foundation from the Objectives Resolution. Jawaharlal Nehru moved this foundation of the preamble in the Constituent Assembly. In 13 / 12 / 1946 , from the Constituent Assembly’s objective resolution, Jawaharlal Nehru framed its basic Preamble. That means, Jawaharlal Nehru moved this foundation of the preamble in the Constituent Assembly on 13 / 12 / 1946 and it approved on 22 / 1 / 1947.But, the initial draft of the Preamble was composed by BN Rau. In 1976, through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment, the Preamble underwent a single amendment. It introduced the terms Socialist and Secular. It was presented while modifying the phrase “unity of the nation” to “unity and integrity of the nation.” Furthermore, the liberty, equality, and fraternity in the Preamble is borrowed from the French Constitution. The Preamble of the Constitution summarizes excellently about the realization of the aims of the Constitution. It does not confer any powers and it provides guidance and purpose to the Constitution. It drew the formed goals of the entire Constitution. The Preamble also depicts the lofty objectives and socio-economic aspirations. It is to be attained through constitutional mechanisms. Berubari case: In the Berubari case, the court said that the ‘Preamble' is the key to unlocking the intentions of the framers. But it is not considered a legally enforceable part of the Constitution. So, it is not subject to enforcement in a court of law. Facts of the Preamble : The Preamble comprises four key components: 1)Source of Authority of the Constitution: It clearly describes that the Constitution draws its authority from the people of India. 2) Nature of Indian State: It proclaims that India has a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic, and republican structure. 3) Objectives of the Constitution: It defines justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity as the fundamental objectives. 4) Date of Adoption of the Constitution: It designates the 26th of November, 1949, as the official adoption date. Key Phrases in the Preamble : In the Preamble, it included several crucial terms.For example some crucial terms are We, the People of India …….. This phrase emphasizes that the Constitution is grounded in the authority of the people of India. The Constitution of India is crafted by representatives elected by the people. The Indian Constitution is framed and created or crafted by the representatives elected by the people. (Not finished ; will continue the Remaining part again)

ന്റെ മാഷേ ഇവിടത്തെ മതം തിന്ന് ജീവിക്കുന്നവരും രാഷ്ട്രീയക്കാരും സംസ്കാരം ഇല്ലാത്ത സംസ്കാരിക സാഹിത്യപ്രവർത്തകരും അവരുടേതായ മേഖകളിൽ മതം പുലമ്പാതിരുന്നാൽ മാത്രം മതി നാട് നേരേവാൻ. ഇവിടെ ജനങ്ങൾ തമ്മിൽ ഒരു പ്രശ്നവുമില്ല.

ചോദ്യം ചോദിച്ച ഒരാളെപ്പോലെ ഞാനും നാട്ടിലെ പല കാര്യങ്ങളിലും കൺഫ്യൂസ്ഡ് ആണ് സാറേ. ക്ഷമിക്കണം.

പണ്ടെത്തേക്കാൾ അടിമകൾ ഇന്നാനുള്ളത്.

Nehruji was an ethist, so he opposed all that mattered Hinduism.

ഇപ്പോൾ ഭരണകക്ഷിക്ക് രാജീവ് ഗാന്ധി85 ൽ പ്രീണനത്തിനു വേണ്ടി കൊണ്ടു വന്ന ബിൽ പിൻവലിക്കരുതോ

No wrong statement which amended at 1972

How many secular country in the world where the Muslim nare majority?

Sir india is not a secular country and don't waste your time

Thanks Sir

മതങ്ങൾ അല്ല മതേതരത്വത്തിന്റെ ശത്രുക്കൾ അത് മതേതര വാദികളുടെ ആത്മാർത്ഥത ഇല്ലായ്മയാണ്. മത പ്രീണനം നിർത്തിയാൽ മതേതരത്വം ഇന്ത്യ യിൽ തളിരിടും 🙏🙏

പറഞ്ഞുവന്നത് മുസ്ലീംങ്ങള് കൊള്ള ചെയ്യാനാണ് ഇന്ത്യയിലേക്ക് വന്നത് എന്ന്.

അടിസ്ഥാനപരമായി മനുഷ്യ സ്നേഹം ഉദാത്തമായി എവിടെയുണ്ടോ അവിടെ സമാധാനവും സന്തോഷവും നിലനില്‍ക്കുന്നു . അതാണ് പ്രപഞ്ച സതൃം. അതാണ് ഉൾക്കൊള്ളേണ്ടത്. --എമ്മന്നെസ് പ്രസാദ്.

B issue ll nt end easily

മതേതരം എന്നു പറയുന്നത് അമ്പലങ്ങളെ പളളിയാക്കി മാറ്റാനുള്ള ലൈസൻസ് അല്ല. ബഹു: സുപ്രീം കോടതി ഉത്തരവ് പ്രകാരമാണ് അയോദ്ധ്യയിൽ രാമക്ഷേത്രം പുനർനിർമ്മിച്ചത്.

, "Loka Samastha Sukhino bhavanthu"

Sir you are a diamond,really wish to see you once. Wish once you becoming a constitutional authority.

ലോകത്തിലെ ഒരു രാജ്യവും പൂർണ്ണമായും മതേതരമല്ല. ബംഗ്ലാദേശിന് സ്വാതന്ത്ര്യം നേടാൻ ഇന്ത്യ സഹായിച്ചു . ഇപ്പോൾ മുസ്ലീങ്ങൾ അവിടെയുള്ള ഹിന്ദുക്കളെ ആക്രമിക്കുന്നു.

Super

കാള വാല് പൊക്കുന്നു. സഹോദരങ്ങൾ ഇന്ത്യയും പാക്കിസ്ഥാനും ഭരിക്കുന്നു. അന്നേ കുതന്ത്രം മെനഞ്ഞു...ഭാവിയിൽ ഇന്ത്യയും ഇസ്ലാമിലേക്ക്...ഇന്നും ആ തലമുറ അതിനൂവേണ്ടി പക്ഷംചേരുന്നു... ഈ രാജ്യത്തെ ശിഥിലമാക്കാൻ ...കൊള്ളയടിക്കാൻ.... ഇന്നും ഈ കപട മതേതരത്വം പറഞ്ഞു ഇസ്ലാമിക പ്രീണനനയം തുടരുന്നു.... കോൺഗ്രസ്...ഹർഷൻ ഇസ്ലാമിക ബീജത്തിൽ ജനിച്ചവൻ....അതായത് അമ്മ പീഡിപ്പിക്കപ്പെട്ടു... ഇന്നും ഫാസിസ്റ്റ് പ്രീണനം....അധികാരത്തിനുവേണ്ടി .....മതേതരത്വം....Thank you sir you are right.....

ഇസ്ലാം മതത്തോട് കൂടുതൽ താല്പര്യം നെഹറുവിന് 20:06 ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നു. ബാൺറി മസ്ജിത്തിനുമുമ്പ് ആ സ്ഥലത്ത് രാമക്ഷേത്രം ഉണ്ടായിരുന്നു.

നെഹ്‌റു നിരീശ്വരവാദി ആയിരുന്നു

സർ ഇത്രയും Sensitive ആയ ഒരു വിഷയം ഇതിനേക്കാൾ മനോഹരമായി പറയാൻ ധൈര്യമുള്ളവർ ഏറെ ഉണ്ടാവില്ല. പക്ഷെ വിഷയം കേൾക്കാൻ താത്പര്യപൂർവ്വം എത്തിയത് മദ്ധ്യ വയസ്സ് പിന്നിട്ടവർ മാത്രം എന്നത് നമ്മുടെ എല്ലാവരുടെയും അപജയം. 🙏🏾

ഇന്ത്യ മതേതര രാജ്യമായത് 1976 ൽ ആണ് മഹാനെ. രാജേന്ദ്ര പ്രസാദ് സോമനാഥ ക്ഷേത്രത്തിൽ പോകുമ്പോൾ ഇന്ത്യ മതേതര രാജ്യം ആയിരുന്നില്ല.

"അഞ്ചു നിസ്കാരം ആറാം നൂറ്റാണ്ടിൽ മുഹമ്മദ് പറക്കുന്ന ബുറാക്കിന്റെ പുറത്ത് കേറി ഏഴാം സ്വർഗ്ഗത്തിൽ പോയി അള്ളാഹുവിൽ നിന്നും നേരിട്ടു വാങ്ങി ഒറ്റ രാത്രികൊണ്ട് കൊണ്ടു വന്നതാണ്" ഈ പച്ചക്കള്ളത്തിലും അക്രമത്തിലും കെട്ടിപ്പൊക്കിയ ഇസ്‌ലാം ലോകവ്യാപകമായി നിരോധിച്ച്‌ പാവം മുസ്ലിങ്ങളെ രക്ഷപ്പെടുത്തണം😡 എന്താണ് അഭിപ്രായം😊

അന്നുജാതിയില്ല മതമില്ല. അതു വേദകാല ംഎന്നുപറയുന്നത്. മുസലിംകൃസതൃൻവിഭാഗംരാമായണംവീട്ടിൽവായിക്കാറില്ല. എൻറെവീട്ടിൽകുറാനുൺട്ബൈബിൾഉൺട്. കൾചലറൽമോഡേണിറ്റിനല്ലഅയഡിയയാണ്‌ഞാനിഷ്‌ടപ്പെടുന്നുപക്ഷെപിറകോട്ടാണ്‌പോകുന്നത്.

വേദംഗൾ ഉപനിഷത്തുകൾ.

India was divided on the basis of religion. How can I dia can be secular? Look at Pakistan and where is the minorities. Why people voted for Pakistan remained in India after partition?It's the right time for them to take Indian citizen shil or go to Pakistan.

ക്ഷേത്രം കൊള്ളയടിക്കുകയാണ് ലക്ഷ്യമെങ്കിൽ, അത്രയും ചെയ്താൽ മതിയായിരുന്നു, ശേഷം അതുതർക്കുകയും അതിനു മുകളിൽ പള്ളി പണിയുകയും ചെയ്തതിന്റെ യുക്തി എന്താണ്

ഇന്ത്യൻജനത പൊളിറ്റിക്കൽ റിലീജിയസ്സ്റ്റേറ്റ് ഒരിക്കലും അനുവദിക്കില്ല അത് ഏത് മതക്കാർ വിചാരിച്ചാലും

നെഹൃുവിയൻ കാലഘട്ടം മതേതര മായിരുന്നുല്ല, അതിനു തെളിവാണ് ഭരണഘടനയിലെ ആർട്ടിക്കിൾ 30- 30A എന്നീ ഭേദഗതികൾ. അത് ഹിന്ദുമതത്തെ തകർക്കാൻ വേണ്ടി യായിരുന്നു. ഹമീത്ചേന്നമംഗലം സാർ ഹിന്ദുവിരോധിയാണെന്നതി നു തെളിവാണ് അദ്ദേഹത്തിൻറെ പ്രസംഗം ആദ്യാവസാനം.

ബംഗ്ളാദേശ് ആവര്‍ത്തികാതിരിക്കട്ടെ...

AthiMandan

Vargeeya visham thanneyanu,charithram valachodikkunnu,madrassayil padichitundennu vyakthamanu