celular ja faz uma "pós" na imagem , a camera não porque em geral entrega o JPG "cru" e requer o pós que vai levar a arte e visão de cada fotografo ja o celular fica um pós generico e geral , entraga o JPg que fez bora editar e dai vc comprar pra ver ai sim sera uma comparação justa, a camera é para uso com pós a comparação direta não é justa
I’ve taken some of my best photos with the iPhone14promax … it’s not designed to take perfect finished photos, you need to think of the iPhone photos as like LOG … you need to edit them and they turn out amazing with colour adjustments and light room fixing … the iPhone is insanely powerful in the photography world now
The problem I see with a mobile phone vs a camera body is the RAW image you get. I notice that on iPhone your pictures will be oddly smoothed out and edgeless when zoomin in
The Sony image was under exposed, whether on purpose or as a result of user error. Cellphones outperform stand alone cameras if the user is not a photographer. If it were me, I would have used either an 85mm f/1.4 or a 135mm f/1.8 lens and used a flat picture profile to get the best dynamic range. Dedicated cameras, particularly interchangeable lens systems, outperform cellphones on even the camera's worst day. The cellphone camera can artificially replicate bokeh, but nothing beats the real thing, in my opinion.
It's not that, anyone can jump right in and do their best. The fact that Chad did so, and not only nailed it, he nailed it so hard, that his drum riffs are superior at every turn than the original refined piece. Maybe 30 seconds to mars wouldn't suck so bad if they had one genius in the band and he was sitting behind the drums... Chad is the default name of every badass and in the dictionary there is a picture of this guy. He came up with a better drum riff than original, in 30 seconds on a 30 seconds to mars song! OH THE POETRY!
Go and listen to the RHCP first album Blood Sugar Sex Magic its is in my top 10 albums of all time and i was 13 when it came out and its one of my 26 year old sons favourite albums.
Hello! I found a listing for $720 for 6500 with 50mm 1.8 . Is this a good deal and how does this camera and video compare agaist a iphone 14pro? Both 24mp and can do 4k60 too? New to the game need help!
sounds like a good deal, if you are willing to learn photography there is no comparison. If you are a sucker for low light or portrait photography the 1.8 with 6500 will kill any mobile camera. but You won't get much out of the camera if you arent even willing to learn basic stuffs like aperture, Sutter speed and iso
@@90AlmostFamous thanks for the reply. Have you ever thought about upgrading to that 6700 it just came out and its 9 years younger? is the upgrade significant to you or its a minor incremental upgrade?
The thing with phone cameras is it does several pictures at varying exposures, select the best exposure fore each part (subject, foreground, middleground, background), and combine them into one. So the exposure of each elements are different. So the sun and clouds would appear darker and the shadowy parts will appear lighter. It feels unrealistic to see every detail. With cameras, you set the exposure values for all of them and achieve a compromise exposure. You can, of course, change the levels post-production but I think it's magical when you just set the exposure to all elements of the picture and just accept the shot for what it is. That's why people like the one shot on the camera more than the iphone. Edit: most cameras do have metering options and multi-focus but the editing phones do to manipulate the exposure is much heavier. A little too heavy for me.
@@bloomwithgrace88It isn't too hard you just have to get to know your cam and then just keep trying with the settings until you mastered them. Then just make sure to shoot in raw so you can edit it nicely.
Looks better how? The pictures taken by iphone seemed shallow without proper depth... and cringe, look at the color profile and dynamics too, the iPhone is PALE in comparison
@@alvinloh9068You might have confused the iPhone and A6500. The one on the left is the A6500. The one on the right, where the picture is saturated, is the iPhone. People tend to prefer a more vivid picture, where iPhone saturates it to look good. But from a technical standpoint, the A6500 does look better on the untrained eye.
What? How is the Sensor of the 14Pro the same as in the A6500? The A6500 has an APS-C Sensor while the Iphonedoesnt even have a one ich sensor @@rishikesh7676
A6500 does shoot RAW as well, and a much bigger sensor, therefore, better color and highlight dynamics. Any phone camera sensor is so small that it relies on digital rendering to create high-quality images. Bigger sensors will always outweigh smaller ones.
celular ja faz uma "pós" na imagem , a camera não porque em geral entrega o JPG "cru" e requer o pós que vai levar a arte e visão de cada fotografo ja o celular fica um pós generico e geral , entraga o JPg que fez bora editar e dai vc comprar pra ver ai sim sera uma comparação justa, a camera é para uso com pós a comparação direta não é justa
You are trash
Doctor Shawn is that you?
I’ve taken some of my best photos with the iPhone14promax … it’s not designed to take perfect finished photos, you need to think of the iPhone photos as like LOG … you need to edit them and they turn out amazing with colour adjustments and light room fixing … the iPhone is insanely powerful in the photography world now
I need this but for video. I am looking for Sony camera for TH-cam so I need camera test. If you can please and thanks
😂
The problem I see with a mobile phone vs a camera body is the RAW image you get. I notice that on iPhone your pictures will be oddly smoothed out and edgeless when zoomin in
a touch of flash would have made the sony picture very compelling
The Sony image was under exposed, whether on purpose or as a result of user error. Cellphones outperform stand alone cameras if the user is not a photographer. If it were me, I would have used either an 85mm f/1.4 or a 135mm f/1.8 lens and used a flat picture profile to get the best dynamic range. Dedicated cameras, particularly interchangeable lens systems, outperform cellphones on even the camera's worst day. The cellphone camera can artificially replicate bokeh, but nothing beats the real thing, in my opinion.
Pressing a button on two devices, one is idiot proof, the other…… we’ll see for yourself.
The dslr is way better...
Fyi it’s a mirrorless camera. Not a big deal just thought I’d let you know if you didn’t already know 😂
Whoa, bro Ur white balance is wayy off, it's set too much for magenta
It's not that, anyone can jump right in and do their best. The fact that Chad did so, and not only nailed it, he nailed it so hard, that his drum riffs are superior at every turn than the original refined piece. Maybe 30 seconds to mars wouldn't suck so bad if they had one genius in the band and he was sitting behind the drums... Chad is the default name of every badass and in the dictionary there is a picture of this guy. He came up with a better drum riff than original, in 30 seconds on a 30 seconds to mars song! OH THE POETRY!
song is 30 sec to Mars - the kill
Well i mean his names literally Chad
If you don't know how to shoot manual A mode exists, Exposure compensation exists. Please use them.
it's great that you link the original video that you rip from. it really credits the original producer.
Can't link on a short but I literally say in the video it's from Drumeo and even show there logo lol
Go and listen to the RHCP first album Blood Sugar Sex Magic its is in my top 10 albums of all time and i was 13 when it came out and its one of my 26 year old sons favourite albums.
Favorite album of mines too!
@@logancorlettI love hearing that brilliant albums pass the test of time.
im sorry but his sounds like jordan matter
That’s why he’s a millionaire 😆
What song is this?
30 Seconds to Mars - The Kill
Not everyone has an ear for music. It's a gift. ❤
I know the song but can’t get the name out of my head
The kill by thirty seconds to mars
@@EthanDCash thank u i forgot it's been so long time to go down memory lane.
@@EthanDCash thank you so much
Just didn’t expose the photo right on the camera and didn’t use the proper lens
Hello! I found a listing for $720 for 6500 with 50mm 1.8 . Is this a good deal and how does this camera and video compare agaist a iphone 14pro? Both 24mp and can do 4k60 too? New to the game need help!
sounds like a good deal, if you are willing to learn photography there is no comparison. If you are a sucker for low light or portrait photography the 1.8 with 6500 will kill any mobile camera. but You won't get much out of the camera if you arent even willing to learn basic stuffs like aperture, Sutter speed and iso
@@90AlmostFamous thanks for the reply. Have you ever thought about upgrading to that 6700 it just came out and its 9 years younger? is the upgrade significant to you or its a minor incremental upgrade?
Absolutely bro, thats crazy cheap for me, like 50% off. 50mm f1.8 is versatile enough i guess, not too narrow.
The thing with phone cameras is it does several pictures at varying exposures, select the best exposure fore each part (subject, foreground, middleground, background), and combine them into one. So the exposure of each elements are different. So the sun and clouds would appear darker and the shadowy parts will appear lighter. It feels unrealistic to see every detail. With cameras, you set the exposure values for all of them and achieve a compromise exposure. You can, of course, change the levels post-production but I think it's magical when you just set the exposure to all elements of the picture and just accept the shot for what it is. That's why people like the one shot on the camera more than the iphone. Edit: most cameras do have metering options and multi-focus but the editing phones do to manipulate the exposure is much heavier. A little too heavy for me.
9
Seems like you don’t know how to take a photo in camera….😂
show us how to take a photo in camera
@@bloomwithgrace88It isn't too hard you just have to get to know your cam and then just keep trying with the settings until you mastered them. Then just make sure to shoot in raw so you can edit it nicely.
it got to be raw? is jpg okay? i don't want spend too much time to edit the photo😂@@voidmobile094
you just showed us how NOT to use a manual camera
How?
What is a manual camera?
How heavy per leg? I want to use them for horizontal racks.
They are very light, you shouldn’t have any problem
this is cool but why u holdiong a random rat from the street on your arms
stpd u
IPhone uses Sony's camera sensor🙂
Not the apsc sensor though
@@Dhurbamanchitrakaryup actually camera smashes these phones
Definitely the Sony pro camera ❤
😂😂 thats not a pro camera
U cant carry 6500 24x7.. but u can't catch attention with iPhone.
Iphone looks better but for the trained eye, Sony wins because of the natural bokeh
Looks better how? The pictures taken by iphone seemed shallow without proper depth... and cringe, look at the color profile and dynamics too, the iPhone is PALE in comparison
@@alvinloh9068You might have confused the iPhone and A6500. The one on the left is the A6500. The one on the right, where the picture is saturated, is the iPhone. People tend to prefer a more vivid picture, where iPhone saturates it to look good. But from a technical standpoint, the A6500 does look better on the untrained eye.
wrong, he labeled the pictures at the bottom left, the saturated one, the third picture, is the sony
The difference makes the lens.
Yeah cuz the sensor is the same
What? How is the Sensor of the 14Pro the same as in the A6500? The A6500 has an APS-C Sensor while the Iphonedoesnt even have a one ich sensor @@rishikesh7676
@@rishikesh7676No?
It’s really close but the 6500 would still do better in low light
Rly close? Look at that deep of field and the bigger palette of colours on a650
Really close?? Fr? 💀
get a call from the camera then. pointless comparison, and you can edit in raw format your photos and get a much better photo from the iPhone
Your talking rubbish sony cameras sensor is bigger than the iphone
A6500 does shoot RAW as well, and a much bigger sensor, therefore, better color and highlight dynamics. Any phone camera sensor is so small that it relies on digital rendering to create high-quality images. Bigger sensors will always outweigh smaller ones.
Sony is amazing 😍
whats the difference between keeping surfboard in wall and 50 dollar rack.
It’s safer, more access convenient, and saves a ton of space
Because it is soooo cinematic. 😏
Fine music taste my guy
Great video! Looking into buying the same camera? What lens did you use?
I switched between the Sigma 30mm f1.4 which is probably the best lens for the price. And a wide angle Sony 10-18mm f4.
@@logancorlett thank you!
Sony win