วีดีโอ

www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=16325115

Its already out lol. Nothing I used in the combo is not released yet.

So? Just play Voiceless instead.

@@Underrated_to_Competitive so, you lose

This one is probably not good competitively wise. I wish though because its a cool line.

I know but FTK sounds better and your opponent doesn't get the opportunity to make an action unless they use a handtrap or a quick-play spell.

Haha lol POV konami.

Technically but you do all of it in your opponents draw phase so its technically an FTK.

Na FTK stands for FIRST turn kill. So in all technicallity it is not an ftk. It’s not FIRST turn anymore.

​@@Underrated_to_Competitive"technically" no kiddo if you want to get technical it's an OTK

it's equally as toxic as an ftk so does the technicality of it really matter?

@@nbafanboy1967 when somebody goes "technically" yes sherloc it fuckin does xD

Yeah but the combo is still cool and I think its just really dumb that the one Valkyrie monster can literally any spell or trap from deck to grave.

You can also run Foolish Burial Goods to dump a spell/trap as well.

Running a pile deck with other strategies could supplement. Like Lab, allowing you to use the bricks for gas

No

Transaction rollback ban and we chillin

​@@bobzbrodr5949ban trasition and beatrice will find other things to abuse

@@bobzbrodr5949both need to be banned or Beatrice needs to require 3 lvl 6 so you have to play Dante

Nooo mi drytron morira😅

Simple, but with a lot of bricks. Pot of Prosperity and Foolish Burial + FB Goods x3 would give you some extra consistency. Plus the Fiendsmith engine, with Lurrie and Tract, would still let you play the engine as a back up plan. Run 3 Thrust and a Talents to find some other useful burn spells, or other blow outs. Could this deck fit a Labyrinth engine?

@@wickederebusdefinitively But what would you do other than Arias Traptrick for Archefiend?

This ratio pls

www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=16228673

I don't have a decklist for it, but you just run the Fiendsmith engine with 3 Allure Queen 1 of the buster blader link and 1 buster welp. Then throw all of that in any deck that is already playing Fiendsmith cards and you lock people from the extra deck. Most of the time that will probably win you the game on the spot because no one right now is playing backrow removal besides Tenpai.

I know but thanks.

So?

It is just regular Snake-Eyes Fiendsmith with Angel of blue tears Give and Take and Gimmick Puppet Nightmare.

www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=15867580

On DuelingBook solo mode you can't switch to your opponents turn. So I said in chat on opponents turn. Watch the video back and pay attention to the Chat.

The Snake-Eyes endboard might as well be a FTK with how much it has.

Fair and balanced deck? Interactive duel? If u call exchanging handtraps interactive then maybe but apart that.... Even snake eyes itself struggle to break it's own board. It doesn't even have the rare quality that tear format had by needing skill and having entertaining mirror match. Calling this a balanced deck but other ftks is kind of a joke, even in a game where the snake eyes player doesn't kill turn 3, does it matter? You already mosty used all ur ressources turn 2 and you won't break SE board turn 4 either so.....

@@fracazer Handtraps are the most interactive game part of yugioh because you dont play solitair but instead a game agains your opponent. Snakee eyes also does not end on 20 negates or floodgates. Amd it actually needs skill to play snake eyes out because you need to use your extenders right. Tear on the outher hand is an unfun deck to watch and to play agains. It is completly luck based with no skill involved. Playing agains tear with any outher deck was just impossible and not fun at all. (Exept if you had shifter in which case you won on the spot). And the mirror is the worsr bullshit i ever saw. The player who makes dweller first just wins. Sitting on a one sided floodgate is not entertaining to watch. Also this format is the format where everyone gets allot more resojrces thanks the fiendsmith.

And handtraps are not luck reliant? It's literally draw the out simulator. Draw only handtraps and pass or draw no handtraps and lose Calling handtraps **the most** interactive part of yugioh is just fundamentally wrong especially when there is the process of breaking a board, trying to dodge an interruption or whatever. Now I'm not arguing that tear was a good format or that handtraps should be all removed. None of these 2 are close to true. But calling the format good bc it's interactive and calling a deck that is fundamentally so unfair that itself struggle to play against itself and most of the time devolve in "who drew the winning handtrap" fair is not something I can really agree with. Also giving more ressources to everyone by making everyone play the same engine? Let alone the fact if this true or not I don't see how that can be good. It's basically forcing everyone to play the same 20 cards in a deck which was already part of ygo problem with HTs and over generic cards

Probably but its still cool and funny.

True but the mental assault on your opponent when they get puppet locked against snake eyes may just be enough to automatically win the set

Good idea lol.

Its just regular Fiendsmith Snake-Eye but add Angel of Blue Tears Give and Take Gimmick Puppet Nightmare.

www.duelingbook.com/deck?id=15867580

Lol

Sorry but I won't be at the NAWCQ. I wish I could go.

bro why be so obscene ? at least you could have enough courage to write D*CK I mean in your lack of modesty be a man at least