วีดีโอ

Amazing video, subscribed

This is probably the best form bridging the Gap between atheist and Christians if you stick with this kind of content you can build a gap between atheist in Christians because both will watch your videos and you will have he hire likes share in content because people from both sides will watch it if this is a helpful comment please let me know if I can help I've had clairvoyance since I was a kid

Thank you for this.

It is not Jesus who is fulfilling prophecies but all the good people who wish to rediscover good things in the Bible. Jesus has nothing to do with it. Jesus is a past, we are the future.

Awesome explanation. 🙂

Fantastic video. The best proof is to accept him as your savior. Your life will change in fantastic and supernatural ways. God bless

The Bible is the most heavily modified and edited single document in history. Most of it well after “AD”. Easy for predictions to come true when you are editing a book with a theme / goal in mind and some knowledge of history. Not sure this guy’s audience is being well served by this discussion. The real story here is a discussion of the evolution of the Bible as a work of literature and not a “holy text”.

I don't know any scientist or student of the scientific method would would embark on this project without first asking the fundamental question: "Were any of the books of the Bible modified from their original form AFTER the events in question took place." The fact is that they were ALL modified, changed, many completely erased in the centuries "AD". The entire premise of the "research" is flawed making it impossible to reach the conclusion in this video. One of my biggest concerns with stuff like this is that it is basically telling people to abandon critical thinking and believe in miracles - when the real answers are so readily apparent.

The Bible is Truth. It's the Word of God. Stand on the Word of God. Worship the Creator, not the creation. Open your heart to Jesus Christ. We are called to be a light in the darkness.

Your video - the shoot, sound, editing, and presentation is exquisite! Award-winning - I am sure there is a special reward awaiting you for this work. Please, don't stop.

Do you have any idea, where I can find the whole original video (in B & W) of Stoner's conclusions? I've seen it once many years ago, but can no longer find it anywhere.

Does the calculation consider factors such as 'prophecies that were made but never fulfilled'? Does it account for the possibility of 'human minds actively making choices that led to the fulfillment of prophecies'? Has anyone conducted an equivalent analysis comparing the prophecies of other religions? From what I've read, Stoner's work doesn't address 'prophecies that were made but never fulfilled', the potential influence of 'human minds actively making choices that led to the fulfillment of prophecies', nor does it provide an equivalent analysis comparing the prophecies of other religions. All in all these numbers are very flawed and we should stop citing this study. It does a disservice to christian apologists by making them look uneducated.

Did the professor also calculate the probabilty that a skilled writer is able to implement 40 or more Massianic prophecies into a story around a man called Jesus?

The Late Dr. Jack Van Impe explained the probability of Christ our Living Savior fulfilling prophecy in a way which even the most novice can understand. I miss Him and his wife are Ella expounding on scripture and teaching on prophecy in a manner that all can understand.

Excellent work I'm promoting it big time

It looks like this math didnt consider that Jesus would be born at the historical time that He was

Amen Jesus die for are sin was buried and rose on the third day according to scripture the moment you believe .. trust in that you would gain his promises of have eternal life the moment you believe that tiny true ... Narrow is the way .. not of work but by faith

excellent, thank you

Would love to see the methodologies of the researches behind the 1 in X

Theist: "This adult elephant weighs 100 pounds". Atheist:" "I don't know exactly how much that adult elephant weighs, but I'm fairly certain it does not weigh 100 pounds". Theist: "You can't say it doesn't weigh 100 pounds unless you can tell me exactly how much it does weigh". I can disabuse your notion of the existence of a god without having to explain an alternate version of how the universe came about.

Hola The Quest, soy Venezolano y estoy haciendo una investigación en cuanto a las profesías mesianicas. En tu video hablas haciendo referencia a qué Jesucristo cumplió 300 profesías y es algo que ya he escuchado en otros lugares pero no consigo una evidencia que respalde esa teoría, osea me gustaría saber cuáles son esas 300 profesías que Jesucristo cumplió. Algo como una especie de lista que corrobore que efectivamente cumplió con todas esas profecías

Amin

Amin. Hvala

Extra

Very nice video, clear and eideitic kind of reasoning with non-hermetic and universal language. Thanks :) btw, today it's been exactly one year after the publication of this video... coincidence? I don't think so :D

I have difficulty with Dawkins scale of belief. Dr. Jordan Peterson has rightly asserted that we don't consciously choose our beliefs. Our beliefs are the natural consequence of our goals in life. Beliefs are the assumed truths necessary to achieve those goals. If my goal in life is to find real purpose for my existence, I am forced to assume as true that a Creator/God exists. As long as my goal remains, my belief must remain. There is no scale to belief. One colleague lost his car keys while walking at night. He believed it possible to find the keys by searching where he could, which was around sparsely scattered street lights. That belief is true. And it remains true regardless of how many or how few street lights there are. If you find you have a need for God, then you will have to believe that He exists and wants to be found. There is no scale.

You are so wrong. Some people investigate reality and come to conclusions about the origin of the universe and the origin of life. We call them scientists and most of them know what they are talking about. Most people don't really care, but just assume that those scientists are right. Not without a reason, because they experienced that those scientists made great progress as can be easily seen in daily life. And some people hold silly superstitional beliefs, because they were brainwashed into it. And they deny reality and the part of science that clearly contradict their silly superstitions. We call them christians or, more general, religuously infected persons. They are sad people.

Just one more thing about atheism/agnosticism. You can be an atheist with regards to fairly literal interpretations of specific theistic gods while still being agnostic with regards to watchmaker type deistic deities. I think this is the most common form of those calling themselves agnostic atheists. We believe in no gods, but there are only some gods we are convinced do not exist. So, unless you specify a particular interpretation of a god we happen to be atheistic about, we're agnostics who believe in no gods.

Nice talk

Attila! glad that you're here making videos. and this is well-done man! Subscribing and joining you on your journey!

If Jesus never existed Christianity would collapse." True except that people insist on believing in lots of things that probably don't exist.

Yes, this is all there is. It's not a problem unless you are determined to insist there must be more. Does a rock have a grander purpose? Does a lizard have a divine destiny? Ego makes you think you are super special and better than everything else - but you're not. Just think of how much better life could be if you were able to let go of your selfish ego and begin to live in reality, as it really is. Both you and the world would be so much better off. The consciousness argument is an argument from ignorance. The problem isn't the lack of an explanation but that there are multiple competing explanations that conform to the evidence, So we'll need more information before settling on the correct one. None of them, by the way, involve anything supernatural. Rats, salamanders and tuna fish also have consciousness, but you probably don't think they have a soul or go to heaven. Again, it's just more ego, demanding to be special. You're the eternal, unchanging snowflake and they're not - because they're not you.

Great video. Can't wait for next week

This is cringe worth infantile nothing. Stop making videos.

Over an estimated 400 billion galaxies, supernovas, black holes, quasars....all 'fine tuning'. My goodness (shaking head). The video started okay, and then it all went so very, very bad.

Reason, justice, purpose, design, good and evil are all human concepts. The universe is not bound by them. I wish theists would stop giving their gods credit for our ideas.

A logical and reasonable world view does not believe in talking snakes and talk donkey's. As an agnostic (global) and a yahweh atheist let me just say your full of it. Most atheists i know and the majority of agnostics i know are not ontological naturalists which is the position you are proscribing to us. What i and most others claim is that to date the only thing we can have knowledge of is the natural cosmos. Is there a creator of the universe? I don't know and neither does anyone else. For all we know we could be the version of sims universe. But, and here is the catch i have no good reason to believe that. I have every good reason to believe the god of the bible does not exist and that it is as fabricated as every other religion. It's historically, scientifically and ethically as accurate as any other "holy" book.

Next why don't you tell a bunch of women what it means to be a woman. Seeing how your a male theist that knows so damn much about what it is to be *what you clearly are not* 😂😂 The presupposition argument is self defeating so please continue to use it. 👍

Keep questing, because you just haven't seemed to have found the answers yet.

So, you have a buttload of people who label themselves "atheist" telling you that your view of them is flawed... are you going to readjust your thinking, or insist the very people who ARE atheists don't actually know what their position is?

Hi, I'm an atheist and I can't help but notice that you claim at the very beginning of this video to be able to explain the ultimate reality. Please tell me how this is done and how you distinguish it from false realities. In detail please, not a single sentence or religious expression.

You quote the Bible. The Bible also promotes or condones slavery, misogyny and violence. It is also rife with contradictions and its supernatural claims are unsupported or even debunked. Why on Earth would you consider that a moral or accurate source on _anything?_

No. You still don’t get it. Atheism is the absence of a belief in a god. Any god. That’s it. Views on how the world began don’t even come into play. Atheism = “I don’t believe in a deity”. That is literally it.

You don't seem to define reality as we do. Your view seems to be about accepting some nonsense fantasy play, because the math is too hard. You insist that we *have to find an alternative way to explain.* Let's show you why that's wrong. Let's say you have a stomach ache. Now, someone tells you that your stomach ache is because an invisible gnome is living in your sock drawer and casting spells. Do you need to have an alternative way to explain your stomach ache, or is life enough experience to dismiss the idea? Atheism doesn't pretend to have a better explanation when we simply reject your silly point of view as unevidenced nonsense. We don't need to accept science to reject your superstition, however having a better understanding of science does place your deity in the "dismissed, not cogent" pile along with leprechauns, pixies, and other mythological nonsense. Your BS about fine tuning demonstrates a lack of understanding of simple things, such as the fact that the universe as a whole, is more than 99.99999% instantly deadly to human life. If that's "finely tuned" you seem to have a strange way of defining the concept. If you tuned a guitar as poorly, it wouldn't be considered "fine". Also, something to think about in your strawman, we are not the ones insisting upon some pure randomness being the reason for life. That's only the apologists. You contrast what someone who knows science says, with something written at a time before the scientific method was discovered.. this does show how far we have come, and an unhealthy attachment by theists to a fuzzy happy fable when reality is just not so.

I think the biggest problem in your thinking ( The quest) is that you have your foundation in your religion, this is your top. Atheism for most people is not even in the top 500 reasons for the foundation of their worldviews. If we go through the taxonomic tree, until we get to homo sapiens sapines. Even this simple fact informs my worldview, areas like empathy, morals, the fact that I don`t have wings etc, etc, it both limits and gives possibility's. This is just the basics. Im human Im a father Im a man Im a citizen Im a voter Im a sceptic Im a educated Im a secularist Im a humanist Im a plummer Im a trainer etc etc etc < 450 more traits, that informs my worldview. Then you come around and tell me to look in to your unsupported claim, I do, and I call BS. You then label my conclusion ( atheist) And put that label at the top of my worldview, despite my rejections, you also ad traits to this label, like science, naturalism, materialism. Not even listening to the rejections. Nothing in my life is based on the label atheism, its my humanism that informs me to oppose theists ( all of them, sad to say, if you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem, even tho you seem like a nice dude ) because they kill and destroy people, its my education that allows me to evaluate scientific claims. and my skepticism that grades my beliefs in probability's and not dogma etc. You need to stop putting atheism as the top, because you have theism at the top, just because atheism is the label on conclusion of the unsupported claim of a deity existing, the claim and the conclusion is not at par, even tho they relate in topic Analogy, If my friend tells me that his car flies, and I say, I don`t believe you. And he comes back with - do you have a better car, if not, then you can`t believe my doesn't fly, you need a better car AND you need to explain where life originated from. If you can`t your religious worldview of my car not flying, is wrong. Btw can you prove that you not believing my car can fly, is true.

So it's all back to : Callsign Deadmeats book, isn't? So it's only because your idol is FT = Frank Turek, right?

This is trite and inaccurate. Nil Poi.

600 stupid science students? Wow, I'm impressed.

All the prophecies are in the bible, right? The bible was written and rewritten by many people, so many that we don't have the originals anymore and there are many differing variations. So it would be easy to make the stories fit the prophecies - it makes a better story when they do! So any calculation based on this mythology is meaningless. What you need and do not have is a bunch of independent sources for the life of Jesus. But there are none. It isn't even clear that there was a person Jesus since the things claimed for him match the claims for many other gods - like walking on water and being from a virgin birth. You can make up anything in a mythology. This reminds me of the illegitimate computations of "intelligent design proponents" who would do a computation of how likely a DNA or protein string is. They always neglect the mechanism we know happens, which is small SUCCESSIVE changes. From many small changes directed by natural selection (a concept they have never been able to wrap their brains around though they have been told it hundreds of times and it is not complicated - which means they are dishonest or really really stupid) it is NOT LEGAL mathematically to multiply to get the probability. Indeed, the probability that creatures will evolve is near 1, not the tiny number they incorrectly compute. So stop pretending you know what you are doing with your math.

Congratulations! You've earned an all-expense paid response video from the fabulous BionicDance. Go see it, here: th-cam.com/video/vgARhFj20co/w-d-xo.html to find out just how wrong you really are. Just FYI: There are no new theistic apologetics that haven't already been countered and debunked. Putting up a video like yours just shows you either haven't done your research for the opposing arguments, or you didn't understand them.