วีดีโอ

Maybe it is because of how inconsistent I was with my videos lately or my accent. Either way, thank you for the support.

By "Quest 3S is peaking" I was referring to how well the Quest 3S was received compared with other VR headsets. But if you want to look at VR in general I still believe we had one of the best years from the recent period.

I'm happy to see someone who has the ability to contribute to the development of this technology more than myself. My dreams about this tech have started with shows like Metrix and Sword Art Online, but the conviction that I may see it become a reality started after discovering a TH-cam channel named Virtual Dreamers(@VirtualDreamers). I wish you luck in inspiring other people and pushing this technology forward.

I'm glad to hear you used your Quest 2 to the fullest, and I wish you luck in your content creation journey.

That will be an interesting future, but personally, I believe that even after full-dive VR becomes a reality, some more time will need to pass before we figure out how to completely disconnect from our physical bodies and exist as standalone consciences in a virtual world.

I understand what you mean, but it is tough to consider the individual differences from each country/region. I'm also not from America. I live in Europe, but I prefer to refer to the base price of the headsets when I make comparisons since it is much easier to let the price conversion to each person since they know the best the prices in their countries.

It's a shame, but I suppose they somehow needed to save some production costs. I hope they will include a headphone jack in future headsets like quest pro 2 and quest 4, and not make this the new standard.

If it’s of any interest to you I’ve found a workaround. The Bluetooth audio latency sucks from any quest headset but if you have wireless audio and are using pcvr you can connect your audio to the vr game on the monitor display and the latency will be almost completely gone. I tested this in Vrchat and beat saber and only ever had even slightly noticeable lag in high intensity songs like crystallized on expert+

If it’s of any interest I have a workaround. It requires a wireless audio option and pcvr, but if you connect a Bluetooth audio device to the vr game display on a monitor, you’ll have the same low-latency response as any wireless headset. No noticeable delay even in fast paced experiences. The problem with connecting Bluetooth audio to the headset itself is the high latency due to the bandwidth being used up to communicate to the controllers. At least from my situation it’s more practical and effective than buying a cable splitter to use wired audio. Unless you don’t have pcvr or Bluetooth

@@Bubba_07 Thanks for sharing your knowledge

@@NokutoVR 👍

Sorry for that. I mainly learned my English from movie/anime subtitles and games, so I have some words that have been imprinted in my brain the wrong way.😅 Il work on them.

If the price is a real deal breaker for you, then they really aren't. Buying a second-hand Quest 2 will be cheaper, but the the technical specs are so much lower that I can't recommend it for a first VR experience at the end 2024. This video was mostly about deciding if you want to get a Quest 3S or save some more money for a better headset.

@@NokutoVR I was thinking of buying a 3 instead of the 3s because of lenses and I can get an used one for the same price

@@TheLifeLaVita If you can try the headset for some time to ensure that it doesn't have any dead pixels or other problems, and change the face interface, this could also be a good deal.

we buy you

I'm not for sale... At least not yet. Jokes aside, since I already have the Quest 3 I will save some money and wait for the Quest 4 in 2026

Yes

@@NokutoVR😔👍

Already pre ordered

For this kind of problem, you will have better luck searching for a dedicated video or forum in which a similar problem is being discussed. What I can think about is to try to log in through a different browser or in incognito mode. Hope you will find a solution, Good luck

Yeah. One of my nightmares is being extremely old, hearing that Full Dive VR will become a reality next year, but dying in less than 11 months.😭

Fair enough. I'm putting my hopes in AI to increase the speed at which they will develop this a level of technology.

It might come sooner then you think, everything is coming fast these days.​@@NokutoVR

Fair enough. Let's pray for a less crazy person similar to Kayaba Akihiko to emerge in the real world.

I respect your priorities. And I hope that Quest 4 will have eye tracking. At least in the premium model.

Or get an android pro gaming iPhone 17 pro max with meta quest 5?!lol

Just thinking out the box lol I’m silly dude

Than with a cyberpunk nerve gear skin suit and non implant neural link mind leaking chiplet head piece and get my butt in the matrix meta verse lol

The faster, the better, but I'm trying to enjoy the journey as well.

In the future VR headsets will reach a point in which some of us will prefer to use them at certain moments instead of a TV. What I wanted to say in this video was that the TV/Monitor will not be completely replace in the same way that we replaced for example wired phones with smart phones. Because monitors and TVs have an aspect of convenience that can't be found in VR.

I was trying to make wolf/fox like ears but I'm not so good at creating avatars. Anyways thanks for taking the time to write a comment! It really helps with the engagement :)))

Glad you liked it. I'm from a European country named Romania.

Same. Right now we are into a strange situation in which we know that eye tracking is needed in VR for increased immersion, but it's to expensive so not many people have headsets that support it. Because of this the developers don't make experiences using this future so even the people who own headsets with eye tracking don't really have a lot of things to use the future for. We need a breakthrough from this deadlock.

YES

i have quest 3 lol so no but maybe ill buy full body trackers

YES!!:D

@@mallo3021 That will be a little more expensive, but good luck.

I understand that for you as a VR enthusiast, there are cases when you prefer using your headset rather than a flat-screen monitor. But in my opinion, as I also said in a previous comment AR may replace them once the technology reaches the stage of replacing smartphones. At that time it will be more convenient because almost everyone will have one. But until then the chances are low because the ease of use, alone and with friends/family, of the flat screen devices is more convenient.

I think it's a pretty reasonable decision. By v.15 most of the technological problems will already be solved.

@@NokutoVR we might all be in our 50s though. a shame but thats life.

@@pktrigger2873 That's why I'm trying to live a healthy life. I absolutely refuse to die until I enjoy 1 or 2 decades of full-dive VR😅

Fair point

Me too

Same

Glad you liked it!

Thanks! Happy to have you on board.

That's pretty much what I'd like to know as well. The sooner we find out the better.

It's true that the consumer VR market is mostly gaming-related at the moment. However, VR technology itself has uses in other fields like military, medical, and manufacturing. So the tech itself will evolve even if we have some periods with subpar titles. And this year seems to be one of the best we had in a long while with many good games released and planned until the end of the year.

@@NokutoVR there has been 1 title in 10 years that is considered AAA. there are 2 games that sold systems in that time. one of them was the aforementioned title, Half-Life Alex. The other WAS BeatSaber. The brutal reality of virtual reality is that it has no real world application. sure it is used for training very select few people in the fields you mentioned, also a couple of others, but that doesn't mean VR is a viable, industry leading platform that you want it to be. The Enterprise market of VR is the smallest market in VR i wouldnt expect them to really push anything other than fidelity and ease of use (which is also already in the consumer market). The hardware tech itself is barely creeping up year over year while the software has suffered from greedy indy devs making half baked titles. it really should be noted, that the games people are playing the most, like VRChat and BeatSaber, Pavlov all live and die by player created content, cutting the devs out of the equation. while thanking them for the good games that we do enjoy, they just arent enough to keep selling systems or drive the industry forward. the communities surrounding these titles just arent large enough to support anything like what you see with flatscreen game communities. Why do you think there arent any good MMOs or a CoD or a Destiny for VR? sounds like it would would be great but why do you think AAA studios arent really pushing anything in vr? theres just no money in it and they dont want to split their established communities and face similar issues just for taking a $50M+ misstep into the VR market. Thats the reason Valve had no issues putting forth the budget to make Alex, they dont have to compete with themselves or anyone else when theyre the only ones who are really in the position to do it all in-house as its a privately traded company. Sony/Meta are trying but theyre dealing more with limitations of hardware, which the effects of those limitations trickle all the way up into the best PCVR users. VR is the ultimate "damned if you do, damned if you dont" scenario and will be until either the bottom of the barrel standards equalize into a stable consistent platform (like with what xbox/ps5 do every 7 years) or until a dev team like valve comes out with a live service game that puts our money where their mouth is.

I'm not saying I'm 100% right about every person's situation. In addition, some innovations may appear in the future that will revolutionize the space, but until then I will stick to my opinion.

At that point for a VR enthusiast personal use, it may become more convenient than a monitor. But for a family it will still be better to get 1 tv/monitor instead of 3-4 VR headsets from a price standpoint.

@@NokutoVR yes. but im not talking about TVs. just normal pc monitors

@@zahid5285 In that case, a specific problem that needs to be resolved is the ability to have a highly detailed representation of your face for video calls, which means that the headset besides being small needs to have good facial tracking, and the avatars need to look much better than the ones from the Apple Vision Pro.

...It's too late to take down the video, so I can only hope that you are a special case :))

i use it to watch movies or shows... but its way too heavy and annoying to wear all day long

@@바보Queen Most of the components will become smaller and lighter. Once they find a way to also solve the problem with the size of the battery( other what an external battery) we will be able to wear them a lot more.

@@NokutoVR yep till then its pretty impracti cal, also ur point about it not being a social experience is 100% correct, friend wanted to get it , then i told him u realize u aint gonna be able to watch with ur gf, and the realization hit.

@@바보Queen Yeah, that's why I believe VR will not completely replace monitors/TVs. AR may replace them once the technology reaches the stage of replacing smartphones. At that time it will be more convenient because almost everyone will have one. But until then the chances are low.

Yeah, it is an amazing game with a lot of fun mechanics and interactions. It definitely proves that you can do a lot with a standalone headset if you don't mind sacrificing the visuals a little.

You are right that the technology will eventually become advanced enough for VR/AR to be considered a high-quality alternative for flat-screen devices. And most likely it will not take a long time to reach that point. But in my opinion, the fact that most people will even then consider this technology as "not essential" will not change. So most VR/MR enthusiasts will still need to use flat-screen devices to share media content with friends and family members who don't use VR. But yes, "never" is an overstatement, but it sounds better than "during our lifetime" :)))

What you people always forget is the battery. Everything else already exists, even if not cheap. We just can't power it effectively in such a small form factor.

@@archardor3392 thats why a puck or power bank like device will be the future when everything except the display and sensors are of the headset it will not be consuming as much power. Apple is already doing it and unless we discover some kind of magical battery it will very likely be the future. phone like device. that also powers alot of vr/ar gear.

​@@archardor3392 It's true that the battery is also a current problem. From what I heard there are already preatty close attempts to create a new type of solid-state battery which is suppose to be more energy efficient. But it remains to be seen.

I hope they will do it faster, as healthy as I try to live, it will be a challenge for me to still be around for 60 more years :)))

This pro will become a reality only after they find a way to make the headsets smaller and closer to human eyes rezolution. Plus finding a soulution for the posibility of burning the lenses if you forget your headset in the sun.

The problem with having a wet suit or exoskeleton is that most people will be too lazy to fully equip themselves every time they want to play. We need something relatively small and easy to use like the Nervegear for this approach to even get popular.

@@NokutoVR tbh I wouldn't really care if I had to put on a wet suit each time.

​@@keshi5541 Me neither, but I believe we are the minority. I hope a solution will appear somewhere in the middle.

@@NokutoVR Hopefully dude. I'm sure some people would obviously find it an inconvinence.

You are a lucky guy for having all these big places to play in. A true omnidirectional treadmill is not something most people will be able to afford any time soon. Even the sliding ones are expensive for the average VR user. Hope you will continue to have an amazing time in VR

I understand that putting a chip in your brain just for the sake of playing video games is a little extreme for most people. But in my opinion, whether we get a chip in our brain or not, as able-bodied people, will come much sooner than a video game that will use this kind of technology. Because no one will make a game if there are just a couple of people with the hardware to access it. There is still the possibility that we will take another approach towards full dive VR, such as nanobots that will be injected in us initially for medical reasons or a soundwave-based headset.

Yes, you are right. In my defense, I was thinking about it when I said discomfort at 3:10, but I wanted to concentrate on things that apply to most VR users not just the beginners. Motion sickness has been around for much longer than VR technology so it is safe to say it doesn't have long-lasting effects.

@@NokutoVR I totally get it! and it was a great vid, very informative! But a large demographic likely to watch this would be newcomers to VR so it would be nice to give them a fair warning of what to expect lol cuz that was one of the main things about VR I was blindsided by. But again, you did a great job, and I look forward to your future vids! keep it up!

@@DannyFantem Thank you for the honest feedback. I added one of my old videos, in which I speak more about motion sickness, in the card and description of the video and I will be more careful in future videos.

I'm not saying there are no risks nor do I say I hate real life. But since it will not allow me to fly on the back of a dragon, use powerful magic, or fight a building-sized monster with a rusty sword, I can only put my hopes in VR.

@@NokutoVR I like the sound of those things too, but if it requires you to give up that much to scoundrels, it will never be worth it. It's more akin to cowardice & willful ignorance that leads one to such a decision. There are far greater reasons to fight for, & live by than entertainment on its own, one of those reasons include the standard of freedom I'd leave to my children & generations of the future. I will not leave them more chains, I will not let them be cattle, I've learned the horrors of this way of thinking & it's revolting. While I'll stand on my hill & die there, entertainment & fantasy on its own is human. To have access to a non invasive, less potentially mind altering, relatively risky free form of it, then that's a more reasonable path to take in my eyes. I love life more, & feel responsibility for the people I love, than continued distraction by those who wish nothing more than to feed me & my own poison to enslave us, which will only lead to doom, not an escape from reality.

@@Cam-opener Then let's hope that a genius will appear and prove that non-invasive BCI is the better choice for the future of VR.

@@NokutoVR That sounds better yes, at least as far as can tell currently.👍

Welcome to the club!

What kind of stuff? 3D Art, VR apps, worlds or something else?