- 23
- 94 896
John's Clunker Cars
เข้าร่วมเมื่อ 3 ม.ค. 2021
I restore classic cars, trucks, and motorcycles. Currently restoring a 1926 Model T and a 1968 Mercury Cougar. I fix my 1969 F100 as needed. If you want to watch me fix junk or clunker cars this is the place.
1926 Ford Model T Engine First Look
Here is a first look inside the 1926 Ford Model T engine. Overall it does not look bad. In another video I will go over the engine in more detail.
มุมมอง: 46
วีดีโอ
1968 Mercury Cougar Front End Paint Removal and Repair
มุมมอง 2436 หลายเดือนก่อน
Paint removal and front end repair on the 1968 Mercury Cougar.
1926 Ford Model T Driveshaft Bushing Removal
มุมมอง 477ปีที่แล้ว
In this video you will see the removal of the drive shaft bushing in the 1926 Ford Model T.
1926 Ford Model T Super Fast Driveshaft Disassembly
มุมมอง 981ปีที่แล้ว
Here you can see the super fast driveshaft disassembly of the 1926 Model T. Overall it is very easy to disassemble. If you look quick you can see Ford written on the driveshaft in yellow marker. The driveshaft and differential were taken apart at some point in its life and overhauled.
1968 Mercury Cougar Front Clip Disassembly
มุมมอง 2.4K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video I will be disassembling the front clip of this 1968 Mercury Cougar. Fenders, Grill, Bumper, and Headlights will all be removed.
1968 Mercury Cougar Engine #2 Disassembly (302)
มุมมอง 5972 ปีที่แล้ว
Purchased Ford 302 number 2. Disassembling this engine to be sent to the machine shop. #2022 #ford #musclecar
1968 Ford 302 Engine Disassembly IT'S JUNK
มุมมอง 1.1K2 ปีที่แล้ว
This Ford 302 is stuck and is a piece of junk. There will be an engine #2 what will it be? #2022 #car #ford #reels
1968 Mercury Cougar Separating a Stuck Ford 302 From a C4 Transmission
มุมมอง 9292 ปีที่แล้ว
In this video we will be separating a transmission from a stuck Ford 302 engine. #ford #car #302 #musclecar
1926 Ford Model T Rear Differential (Dad Had To Step In) #shorts
มุมมอง 7782 ปีที่แล้ว
I have been away so Dad had to take over the project for a bit. He installed new bearing races and oil seals along with some retaining pins. #shorts
Forgotten 1968 Mercury Cougar Will it Run? No It Won't
มุมมอง 7892 ปีที่แล้ว
The engine in this Forgotten 1968 Mercury Cougar will be checked to see if it will run. The engine will then be removed and later disassembled. #car #mercury #302 Follow Johns Clunker Cars on Instagram and Facebook
Forgotten 1968 Mercury Cougar Walk Around Will it Run and Drive?
มุมมอง 2.9K2 ปีที่แล้ว
Here is a 1968 Mercury Cougar that is ready for restoration. In this video we will be doing a walk around to asses the situation. Will it run and drive? #musclecar #car #mercury #restoration
1926 Ford Model T Rear Suspension and Bushings
มุมมอง 1.6K2 ปีที่แล้ว
In this episode we will be assembling bushings and rear suspension components along with some more painting.#car #ford #hardwork
1926 Ford Model T Engine Degreasing Time Lapse and Parts Clean Up Part 6
มุมมอง 6K3 ปีที่แล้ว
In this episode I will be degreasing the engine with a needle gun and cleaning up the differential. #car #ford #old
How To Fix A Hole In Your Car Door (Ford Truck)
มุมมอง 8383 ปีที่แล้ว
How To Fix A Hole In Your Car Door (Ford Truck)
1926 Ford Model T Differential Disassembly Clean Up Inspection and Painting Part 5
มุมมอง 6K3 ปีที่แล้ว
1926 Ford Model T Differential Disassembly Clean Up Inspection and Painting Part 5
1926 Ford Model T Restoration Part 4 Rear Suspension and Differential Disassembly
มุมมอง 8K3 ปีที่แล้ว
1926 Ford Model T Restoration Part 4 Rear Suspension and Differential Disassembly
Ford Model T Restoration Part 3 - Front Suspension Assembly and Painting - Reaming King Pin Bushings
มุมมอง 14K3 ปีที่แล้ว
Ford Model T Restoration Part 3 - Front Suspension Assembly and Painting - Reaming King Pin Bushings
I’m glad to see someone else painting parts with a brush. My 6 and 10 year old are working on a 1925 coupe. My 6 year old is our paint department. We are getting ready to go through the ear end.
That thing is junk. No way that front end is still square with that many "crinkles" and "dents" in that much "structure". That car went OVER something HARD. And I mean what it went over was hard. A concrete guardrail or ledge or big pieces of rip-rap or potentially an old-fashioned steel guardrail before they were "energy absorbing". Not that cheap-ass POS Ford "front structure" in those glorified Falcons ever needs much excess energy to be trashed. I didn't think you could find a bigger POS of a "project car" than that "barn find" Model T but I do believe you pulled it off. And where is the T by the way? Not so much a "family project" after all if only two people at a time can go "cruising" in it when "restored"? Or did you find out you can make "parts lists" all damned day for an antique - and already obsolete when new compared to the "competition" - car like that while thinking there MUST be a huge "parts industry" out there for antique cars as "popular" as Model Ts but thinking doesn't make it so? Especially for a 2-door sedan or whatever that pile is? Or is it that "restoration parts" are out there but they're stupid expensive because of how UNPOPULAR Model Ts now are among "restorers" given how "cheap" already restored ones sell for and how absolutely retarded a "restorer" has to be to start with a pile like the "car" you did? An "original" 1926 T on wood-spoke wheels? And missing pretty much the entire "interior" and sheet metal like floor pans? And you thought or implied early on it was "mechanically sound"? Yeah. Right. It was parked for a reason. Or ten. Or a hundred. And "parted out" for somebody else's project car(s). Model T "mechanicals" are common as dirt. In good shape? Not needing "mechanical restoration"? Not so much. Like the "loose kingpin bushings". $1 says there were no bushings left and the knuckles and kingpins were scrap too due to how long that pile was driven with the bushings "dry". And then gone. But yeah. Because it had "original paint" under a piece of door panel "trim" somebody almost certainly "resprayed" with that HIGH GLOSS BLACK Ford never would have been able to "spray" that evenly even if Ford would have "sprayed" rather than DIPPED body parts it HAD to be "rust free" and SO "well taken care of". Before being "gutted" and stripped of all the "hard to find" parts like wheel rims and the seat springs and...pretty much everything else that "car" was missing and was worth stripping off it and out of it. It was an el cheapo economy car with zero options or frills when new just like a buttload of others and the quintessential "$350" Model T in '26 and of course by then the T was doomed and the A was waiting in the wings and although ALSO obsolete compared to the "competition" when brand new at least As were available in colors other than black (Ts were also by "special order" long before '26) and had a "modern" stick-shift manual trans with pedals that did what they did on the "competitions" cars. Sort of. Just because something is old it isn't automatically "valuable" and just because something is "cheap" it isn't automatically a "good deal". In fact that T and this Cougar could be free and you'll still end up "overpaying" compared to what you'd have "invested" in an ACTUAL CAR capable of "running and driving" as-is and where-is at purchase with no "investment" needed beyond gas, fluids and maybe a new battery. If it isn't on 4 tires that "hold air" in this day and age it's already most of $1k from "running and driving" to begin with IF you're really "restoring" it. Start in on "mechanicals" like "suspension and brakes" where "hard parts" must be replaced and it's $100 per axle bare minimum. Bushings? Bearings? Ball joints? Make it $200 easy and a good 2-3 hours per corner minimum for a DIYer. When vehicles are basically "abandoned" there are reasons. And the reasons are basically NEVER "cosmetic".
I 100% guarantee there is absolutely no way whatsoever to be concerned about possibly getting Chevrolet powertrain components or parts mixed up with that Ford spur gear "differential" junk unless you're totally blind and have hook hands.
So well taken care of in the past. You bet. It's damn near mint. You only have to "invest" maybe $10,000 in a good "parts car" to "donate" everything that "car" is missing and the whole catalog of repop '26 T restoration parts and "supplies" and 1500 hours of labor in "restoring" it and you'll have no trouble whatsoever getting $5,000 for it.
I needed to see this for some motivation. I'm riding the struggle bus real hard with my 84 LTD (Fox body) engine....It's out of the car (i got it that way) with the tranny still attached and staring at it doesn't seem to separate the engine and tranny. I'll be doing it on the floor too.
Your car has the mid-level deluxe interior. Not an XR7 but not a base model.
What did I just witness?
Were you trying to stay original? It seems that welding over the oil caps and tapping in a grease zert would be a good upgrade.
@@jjpenn8925 It is staying original. No need to install grease zerks as the oil cups work just fine. Thanks for watching!
@@JohnsClunkerCars I was figuring as much.
Replacing the oil seal on my freshly built rear end. It started leaking in Texas on our #coast2coast4hydrocephalus trip (12 days)
Fellow cougar fan here. Thank you for showing cougar love . Not many folks doing that. If I may offer a few tips. When using the hammer and dolly, choose the dolly closet to the profile you are working on. Most hammers have a curved surface, so you impact at a single point. You just just want to use enough force to move the metal a little bit at a time. When you hit harder you will distort the metal rather than manipulate it. Ive always used a large crescent to straighten the strut rod brackets. Can't wait to see more progress!
Thanks for watching!
If you're using a hammer and dolly the metal is already distorted and hammers and dollys can only stretch - i.e. distort or "move" it - more. To remove a distortion metal must be shrunk. There are many ways to do that but if you're "old school" that means using the "backside" of a body hammer and the "pick" to "peen" make a bunch of little tiny dents to remove one large one. Hammers and dollies can finish metal. They cannot "move" it. And when it comes to "structure" like strut rod brackets that were cheap lightweigh crap pigeon shit welded on to begin with IF having to "straighten" them is a common thing when "loving" a POS reskinned Falcon like a Mustang or Cougar, making them "straight" again does absolutely nothing whatsoever to "strengthen" them or aid in "collision repair". That whole front "clip" is trashed and the "crinkles" and "dimples" in the actual "structure" along with the areas where "spot welds" are broken loose completely AND "small dents" clear back into the firewall/trans tunnel/floorpan "structure" all PROVE that the entire "unibody" is distorted and bent at least "halfway back" and the "frame" is no longer "square". With a "unibody" the front half can't be distorted without the back half being distorted which is why you have to "pick up" both front and rear "points" on a "frame machine" to begin to see the extent of the damage. With no real subframe whatsoever in those pieces of shit it doesn't even take a "5 mph collision" to "total" one because there is absolutely no way whatsoever to "economically repair" a "unibody" with no front "frame rails" at all. Especially when major steering and suspension system locating parts like "strut rod brackets" are located as far from body "structure" as possible and are that cheap and cheesy and that poorly "fastened" to a "crossmember" from the factory. Those "strut rods" are the only suspension locating arms and "pull" the front suspension along while driving. Under "tension". During braking they are still under tension because the "sprung weight" of the vehicle vastly exceeds the "unsprung weight". And those "front ends" have so-called "shock towers" that are large enough for McPherson struts yet they have coil springs - non-cylindrical coil springs - and shock absorbers and "control arms" almost like a real "modern" IFS. So why the "strut rods"? Because the "front structure" is too weak to "pull" the front end along and handle cornering and breaking forces as well in lead sled "luxury performance" cars like Cougars. Which are WAY beyond what the Falcon "platform" was ever designed to "support" even in the "cabover" vans and pickups once you get a boat anchor Ford "small-block" under the hood along with air conditioning, PS, PBs, maybe speed control, a "cooling package" big enough to cool all that crap behind the worst grille design possible in a "plattorm" ALREADY severely "thermally challenged" with those "aprons" and "shock towers" doing everything possible to trap engine heat in the "engine compartment". And then go real "high performance" with a "big-block"? And toss on California emissions? There's a reason Cougars started sharing a "platform" with the "mid-size" and radically downsized so-called "personal luxury car" Thunderbird when the "Fox platform" replaced the Falcon "platform" and Mercury gave up all pretense of Cougars as "high performance". Because they were an even bigger joke than Mustangs as big-block "muscle cars" given how fast they'd overheat, vapor lock, ice up carbs and frequently ALL OF THE ABOVE in one "trip". That's also why when T-birds went "hi-po" again in the late 80s with the Turbo Coupe and Super Coupe PRIMARILY to "compete" with Ford Taurus SHO 4-door midsize sedans with Suzuki power they didn't even bother with Cougar "counterparts". FoMoCo had finally lived down the giant joke Cougars were as "muscle cars" and "forgotten" about the buttloads of cash "invested" in trying to sell Cougars as some sort of GTO/Cutlass/GS "competitor" when if not for sharing the same "platform" with the Malibu/Chevelle NONE of those "muscle cars" would have been in production or their base model parent models because BOP collectively couldn't have even have come up with the cash to "invest" in a Malibu/Chevelle "competitor". Not that those BOP "muscle cars" weren't Cougar "killers" every way possible and wouldn't have been even without big-blocks. They were and would have been. That's the point. FoMoCo came up with the Cougar "variant" of the Falcon platform in order to have a "high performance" non-Ford 2-door mid-size "coupe" nobody else could "compete with" and ended up making it a no-brainer for Pontiac to "redevelop" the GTO Judge and Buick to "redevelop" the GS and Olds to "redevelop" the Cutlass 442 AGAIN using the new Malibu/Chevelle "platform" with its semi- "fastback" design because the Cougar was such low-hanging fruit as just another Falcon "reskin" and an absolute lead-sled of a "mid-size" 2-door "coupe". Those piles tip the scales at most of 2 tons in "base" trim full of gas. As "unibody" cars. GM A-bodies - Chevelles etc - have to be completely "loaded" with every power option and be Super-Sport big-block cars with automatics and 12-bolt rears as BODY-FRAME cars with factory "4-link" rear suspension to break 3600. "Stripped down" as a Malibu with a 350, 4-speed, 10-bolt and bench seat they're more like 3400. And you can't make a stock A-body overheat or vapor-lock if you try. They had something like a 4000-lb towing capacity, lol. Cougars get so little "love" because they are so "rare" compared to their Mustang "cousins" and all those FORD "economy car" engines under "Mercury" hoods after DECADES of FoMoCo pretending Mercurys were "upscale" and had their own special "Mercury" engines and transmissions during the flathead V8 and "MEL" engine "eras" were a big TURNOFF to "loyal" Mercury buyers or the few that were still young enough to drive and wanted "high performance" during the "muscle car era". And tacking on stupid shit like "XR-7" that meant absolutely nothing to anybody ever so even Mercury salesmen were unable to come up with an explanation that made sense absolutely didn't help. Neither did ripping off obvious "styling cues" like hideaway headlights from the "competition" when they certainly weren't "high performance". And the "notchback" look just reinforced they're Falcon "variants" just like Mustangs. Only with no optional "sportsroof". For awhile.
I have a running 1925 motor and chassis for sale if you need it, or anyone else.
Good job on the video. I bought a 27 touring a couple days ago and hopefully getting it redone also. My wheels are too rough to use so hoping to find some used ones somewhere.
John, I've got to hand it to you for your motivation, knowledge, and work ethic. I also have a Ford 1926 Model T although mine is a 2-door. I've had it for almost a week. It has not been run for more than 5 years and I'm working on cleaning and getting it started. I am so appreciative that I do not have to do a complete restoration. Thanks for the educational video.
Hang in there
nice, i have a 302 in a 82 f100 that probably is going to look exactly the same inside. mine had water down the carburetor for probably 15 years of sitting. good boat anchor now...
I have a 67 I'll either restore or mod upgrade with a 98 Lincoln mark viii i have as a donor
We don't see any actual work, just progress..
Nice Job ,Keep Them Coming !!!
😊
😊👍😎
Very Nice Job On Your Video !!!
Why are almost all these comments so aggressive? Lol chill. *Constructive* and *kind* criticism. Awesome video btw :)
Great video! Keep posting, we want to see more!
With any restoration, you've got to do something everyday. Stay focused and keep pluggin away. Good luck! Great automobile worth saving. If I make a suggestion, don't take the whole car apart at once. It's like eating an elephant, one bite at a time. Start with the chassis. Get it running, then work on the body.
Thanks , now I will be ready for the mess.
I like your brass hammer that's too funny
Do you have any videos putting the body parts back on the car?
I don't yet. Still very early on in the restoration.
Im rebuilding a 1926 T Roadster. It was apart when I bought and Im having trouble finding anything to show me how it goes together. Im ready to install the body but can't find anything to show the sequence. I'm hoping that you have more videos. So far I found 1 2 and 3.
On the Model T my family is working on we removed the fenders, running boards, and mud guards before we removed the 6 bolts to remove the cab portion. My 1926 is a coupe.
Look nice
Have you found the Model T to be difficult to work on? I'm not a mechanic and have only basic hand tools, not a machine shop. With a Ford Model T repair manual and the purchase of maybe a few specialized Ford tools, can an average non-professional keep a Model T running and driving well and repaired when necessary (the parts that most often need attention?) I used to rebuild bicycles when I was younger, and am not afraid to get dirty. A correct, well-maintained, unmodified but solid touring car is on my short list of adult "toys" to find one day. Thanks!
The Model T was designed to be easily worked on. You will need the Ford manual. There are other helpful manuals out there as well. You will also need some specialized Ford tools as well for maintenance. They came with all the special tools when new. The tools can be easily sourced online if they are missing. If the average American in the 1920s could work on one you can too.
@@JohnsClunkerCars Thanks for your kind reply. Keep those videos coming.
Keep up the good work. I enjoyed this video, and look forward to more.
Thanks for watching. More Model T videos are in progress.
Happy birthday john!!!!!!
Working on a 68 myself... Would it be possible to contact you? How might we exchange contact info not on you tube?
wd-40 those bolts and nuts, let them sit for a couple of days , then use a heating torch to heat them up, break them lose then work them tight , then lose.
The vacume lines are to open the headlight doors
How is the model t going?
I will start work on the Model T this weekend actually. You will see more Model T videos very soon as it is the winter project.
Waiting for this baby to be finished so we can we have more of an idea of what we dealing with on ours haha
did they have spray paint back in 1925 ,or did they brush or dip the parts. how did they paint the bodies?
a lot of people think all model T s were the same, not true. My grandma had a 1925 with small windows behind the passenger windows , 4 doors touring model. I think she might have ordered the body thru sears catalog or Montgomery Wards.
My Granma had a 1925 model t touring with the tall cab and the small cabriolet or opera windows. really fancy car back in its day.
great videos. how do you fix the chipped out key way on the end of the axle? and do you use rust oleum gloss black for painting chassis parts?
The axle shaft with the chipped keyway was kept to use the gear on the other end. There is no plan to fix it. Yes I use rustoleum gloss black on the chassis parts since it has a nice look.
Nice snag, even the timing chain looked tight. I couldn't see any markings on the pistons. Was it standard bore?
Yes it was standard bore. Its not standard bore anymore though.
@@JohnsClunkerCars That's amazing. I thought I was doing great picking up a fresh rebuild for $500... It's 40 over which is 20 better than the block I pulled out of my Cougar.
Enjoying your videos, John. Glad to see your "made in USA" brass hammer make an appearance
Glad you enjoy the videos! Thanks for watching!
had a 27 the chassis engine mint retored body was almost done i went home one weekend and my brother had sold it for a 1000.00 i was just sick
why?
Better Box Them Frame Rail's. Make It Safe!
nice shape and good job on your painting and changing 👍 your bushings
back wheels only have one bering and it's on the inside
T's were all black to keep things in the assembly line uniform until the A's came out and tripled production
This Model T will be painted black.
The 1926-27 model t’s came in a couple more colours
never realized these old cars were so intricate, many years ago, i restored a 1963 MG Midget, it was much easier than this
Pull that dent in that door. Closes good still