วีดีโอ

Australia is a sovereign nation. Voting does matter.

@@constitutionalclarion1901 Australia is an arm of the American empire, you are given a choice of two parties which will more or less do the same thing as they are contained in the same small area(metaphorically), that area is dictated by the hegemon. Significant change will only ever come from within if the hegemon grants us sovereignty or we amass enough power for the right of greater sovereignty.

🎯🎯🎯

Ummm... Do you have a driver's licence, a passport, an 18+ card, a birth certificate... Then you have government ID. Government ID is just shorthand for a legal document that is recognised as being legitimate and trustworthy.

If Pauline was so concerned about this issue then why has she waited 2 years to bring it up

Any age verification that requires a photo is identical to identity verification, as there's no evidence they remove that data

You're wasting your time. Twomey is a closet Marxist. She gives some virtue-signalling criticism to the U16 Bill, and then invites us to consider the "benefits", but the net result is that she promotes the U16 Bill. She was Albo's lackey during Labor's failed 'Voice'.

​​​​​​@@DD-bx8rbUnfortunately, today's authoritarian "leftists" don't understand or respect the absolutely crucial importance to democracy of genuinely free speech. They don't understand or accept that the only situation where speech may reasonably be limited is the making of clear and unequivocal direct physical threats to others or to their property, or very clearly and unequivocally, directly inciting others to do the same. And even this should be very narrowly interpreted. Anyone who insists on a right of citizens not to be offended or insulted/ humiliated doesn't accept genuinely free speech. ..As Noam Chomsky, the late US law professor Ronald Dworkin and others have written. Forrester, Finlay and Zimmerman have also produced a very comprehensive criticism of RDA 18C.

Corporate Administration

Military Occupation

Defacto government

@@raggedyman6327🎯🎯🎯

Albanese Government (if he was completely unchecked)

Is that code for scott Morrison populism?? Pretty he was the first Scott to lead anything apart from bad hockey teams out of Edmonton....

It's a way for everyone to submit their ID so the government knows what you're watching.

It must be fantastic for you to be so much wiser than us mere "sheep" (and since most sheep end up at the slaughter house, maybe they have good reason to be worred!). Yes, we have all those things now, but a tax file number for instance doesn't let the government monitor what we do online

Digital ID can and will be used in ways that those things are not. Government would not be spending billions on it if that were not the case.

Twomey is a closet Marxist. She gives some virtue-signalling criticism to the U16 Bill, and then invites us to consider the "benefits", but the net result is that she promotes the U16 Bill. She was Albo's lackey during Labor's failed 'Voice'.

It's too late to worry about that. We already have digital ID in Australia.

We already have Digital ID though. Bank accounts, tax file numbers, phone numbers, visas, passports; these are all digitally logged and recorded. Not to mention things like Centrelink! I'm genuinely confused why people are against this?

@@Bingusaurus I do have reservations about the legislation though. Not because I think it's some kind of dastardly plot by the government to "get our information". The government already has more information on us than people apparently realize. It was parental groups and educators who rallied hard for this legislation. Otherwise, I doubt the government and the Opposition would have even been bothered. But I wonder if prohibiting kids under 16 from communicating on social media is (a) even going to work and (b) do more harm than good for some kids. As a spokesperson from Headspace pointed out: "We need to tread very carefully or we risk dialling back young peoples' rights and pushing them into more isolated, less supported places."

@@Bingusaurus This is death by a thousand cuts. Its not about gaining information on people, yes they already have all that, its about using that information to control us. Now you might think this as paranoia but remember Albanese is a self confessed proponent of turning Australia into a Communist State and this is the beginning of an ongoing program to gain more power and control. This is not about age restriction its about adoption of the Digital id . Now you might wonder whats wrong with that? Fair question. At present if you need to verify age you can use a variety of documents, License, Birth Certificate etc, Anything with your age should suffice. Same as if you need to verify your address, any number of documents will do. Now if you put all those documents into one folder , a folder Administrated by the Government and named "Digital iD" , every time you need to Identify yourself you will need to produce this " iD Folder " and all its content will be available to the recipient, everything. Obviously for minor uses such as Age verification or a minor Traffic infringement it may not be an issue . But for more serious or complex issues this may well impact badly on you. If you are a model citizen, totally law abiding , obedient and wealthy you probably wont see the problem. My sister for example is a Professional, and quite wealthy. She recently turned 70 and I suspect has never had a speeding fine in her life. She I'm sure would not have a problem displaying her life's history for all to see, but not everyone is like her. Many people have done things they regret or they're not proud of. Behaved badly at times. Now it is not my place to judge them, nor is it the governments job. There are authorities in place who deal with peoples issues and problems , ie Police , Medical , Judicial systems, etc . they for the most part operate with a degree of confidentiality and separation. Now we introduce a File with your Name on it, containing all your records, available to anyone who has authority to open it. I probably wont have authority to open yours, but some bureaucrat siting in an office maybe far away will have that authority. They will also have authority to press the button " DENY". This is really challenges the question, what does it mean to be Human?

I have become a fan of Senator Lambie. I thought she was fantastic in the Senate yesterday. Whether people agree with her or not, she is sincere and speaks from the heart.

Before assuming that I support a leftist agenda simply because I supported the constitutional reform of a voice to Parliament, perhaps you should look at my other work, which would show you that I do not support the agenda of any side of politics. Have a look at my video (and parliamentary evidence) criticising the government's proposed misinformation legislation and its proposed campaign finance legislation, for example. I explain the constitutional issues as I see them, in the context of my experience, research and knowledge about the Constitution. Just because you oppose something, such as the use of digital ID, does not mean that there is a worldwide conspiracy to impose it.

@@constitutionalclarion1901 A smorgasbord Marxist neverthess.

​​​@@DD-bx8rbname calling does not solve any problems. I can appreciate that you have an opinion you want to share, but many will not take you seriously if you start trying to gesture vaguely at how biased they are.

Advocacy Against the Social Media Ban for Children Under 16 in Australia The Australian government’s proposal to ban social media for children under 16 has sparked significant debate. While it aims to protect children from harmful content, there are substantial concerns about the potential negative consequences of this policy. Below is an argument against the ban, focusing on its unintended effects and offering alternative solutions: 1. Social Media as a Lifeline for Marginalized Youth Social media provides a critical platform for marginalized groups such as LGBTQ+ and neurodiverse youth to find support and community. These platforms often serve as safe spaces where young people can connect with others who share similar experiences, fostering a sense of belonging that may be unavailable in their offline lives. Without these connections, many may feel isolated, exacerbating feelings of depression and anxiety. 2. Risk of Driving Youth to Unsafe Online Spaces By banning access to mainstream platforms, the policy risks pushing children to unregulated or covert spaces online, where harmful content and predatory behaviors could be even harder to monitor. Experts warn that such a shift might create more problems than it solves. 3. Impact on Mental Health and Identity Formation Social media is not just a source of entertainment but also a tool for self-expression and identity development. Removing this outlet could hinder children’s ability to navigate their personal and social identities, leading to increased mental health challenges. 4. Lack of Alternative Safe Platforms While the policy exempts platforms like Google Classroom and Headspace for education and mental health, these tools cannot replicate the social connection and peer support found on social media. Policymakers should instead focus on creating or endorsing moderated, child-friendly platforms designed for safe interaction. 5. Parental Rights and Responsibility The ban undermines parental authority to determine what is appropriate for their children. Many parents feel capable of guiding their children’s online behavior through parental controls and education about online safety. 6. International Precedents and Best Practices Other countries have introduced measures to improve online safety without resorting to outright bans. For example, France and the United States require parental consent for data collection from younger users. Australia could adopt similar measures, focusing on stricter regulation and oversight of social media algorithms and content moderation. 7. Support for Education and Digital Literacy Instead of a ban, the government could invest in programs to teach children and parents about responsible social media use. Promoting digital literacy equips young people to navigate online spaces safely and critically. Recommendations: Implement Age-Appropriate Content Moderation: Platforms should be required to offer child-friendly modes with curated content. Parental Consent Systems: Enforce mechanisms requiring parental approval for underage accounts. Promote Digital Education: Launch campaigns to educate children about online risks and respectful behavior. Focus on Algorithm Accountability: Require transparency from platforms on how content is curated and recommended. A ban may seem like a straightforward solution, but it overlooks the nuanced role social media plays in the lives of young people. Policymakers should consider more balanced approaches that protect children while preserving their ability to connect, learn, and grow in a digital world. Assisted with chatgpt but the ideas are mine.

@@Commander.Starfleet "LGBTQ+ and neurodiverse youth to find support and community"?... What, to be told trying to be something they are not will make them happy? The LGBTQ industry is simply child abuse and mutilation.

It wouldn't be a matter for the Governor-General. It would be a matter for the application of the law in relation to any offences committed, and the law as to the validity of elections.

@constitutionalclarion1901 I should have clarified: what if the government benefited, i.e. won the election thanks for the ballot-stuffing?

Twomey is a closet Marxist. She gives some virtue-signalling criticism to the U16 Bill, and then invites us to consider the "benefits", but the net result is that she promotes the U16 Bill. She was Albo's lackey during Labor's failed 'Voice'.

This was introduced and backed by the Liberal Party

UniParty garbage bill

That's the debate at the moment. Facebook currently uses AI to detemine age, and promises to delete the photo after it's been used.

Yes, I've had trouble with my audio and do need to fix it. Unfortunately, I'm not very good at tech and don't know how. If you have any suggestions, do pass them on.

@constitutionalclarion1901 Maonocaster All in One Podcast Production Studio with Microphone is $199 at Jaycar. That might be worth a try

I think the same as you regarding the creators delivery. It’s hard to tell someone that their voice ‘is hard to listen to’ without risking offence, especially when the content is worth a listen and your interest is not in shutting the person down. Still you are very brave😅

@@constitutionalclarion1901 Ok I know the simplest way. You would use an EQ: an equaliser. It's software that cuts out or enhances any problematic frequencies. I could do this in about 10 seconds. There will be default options; you set it to female vocal to get rid of the barely audible high end frequencies that can be problematic. [btw there is the same thing for male voices ] That would help to make the voice stand out better. But I don't have a problem at all listening. You are fine to me.

​@augustsnowfall5189 She has a very normal Australian woman voice, and her diction is very exact, unsure how to define the "problem".

Ok I managed to find the divisions and documents myself. But gods if it isn't frustrating how difficult it is to read these! Absolutely required to have the original document up and cross-reference every line of it with the proposed amendment, in ways that aren't always clear because it'll say "page 7" but actually be on page 11 of the actual document... And then the Bill _itself_ being an amendment to an existing Act means you have to cross reference _that_ as well.

I'm still trying to work out what exactly division 1383 was about. "That Schedule 1, item 6 stand as printed". It's not in reference to any amendment I can see, and it's not in reference to the item that was amended by previously voice-voted amendments. I don't understand why that particular vote took place or what the significance of it was.

Yes, it is really hard to follow. Usually the bills page will have the various amendments proposed by different people. There are also updated chamber documents which record what has happened in terms of votes etc, as the day proceeds. There is also another place where you can find tabled documents, but from recollection, it is (or at least was) quite hard to make it work.

Yeah, games and messaging don't count. Ironic, considering game chats are often some of the most toxic places on the Internet (as pointed out in the Senate this evening...) Unfortunately when Senator Canavan pointed out that Facebook Messenger is one of the more popular messaging apps and that it requires a Facebook account to use, the Labor Minister in the Senate was unable to clearly articulate why it would still be possible to use Messenger for under 15s.

Kids can still access Pornhub for free! This legislation is not about protecting anyone but themselves and their bosses at Blackrock Vanguard and State Street