I totally agree. Key to controlling Auto cost is to not get a vehicle bigger and more gas hungry than you need for your family or for your job. That typically lowers both purchase price as well. Chose carefully and it will lower your maintenance cost as well.
@@cameronmachado1774 But the cost of filling up the tank has nothing to do with the overall cost of of ownership and use of the vehicle. It's just a momentary charge. Example: Decades ago I had a vehicle with a 30+ gal tank that I filled about once a month. At the same time I had a car with a tank about half that size that I filled about twice a month They both about the same gas mileage and for a while I was driving both vehicles about the same mileage. The cost per mile of operation for the gas was essentially the same. Yes, the vehicle with the large tank cost me twice as much to fill, but I only had to do it half as much as the other vehicle.
@@cameronmachado1774 But the cost of filling up the tank has nothing to do with the overall cost of of ownership and use of the vehicle. It's just a momentary charge. Example: Decades ago I had a vehicle with a 30+ gal tank that I filled about once a month. At the same time I had a car with a tank about half that size that I filled about twice a month They both about the same gas mileage and for a while I was driving both vehicles about the same mileage. The cost per mile of operation for the gas was essentially the same. Yes, the vehicle with the large tank cost me twice as much to fill, but I only had to do it half as much as the other vehicle.
@perryallan3524 I tend to agree with you, but I can see why Ramsey would include it since they're a personal finance organization and filling up adds up
I have 2003 Ford F150 with 130k miles, 2004 Dodge 2500 diesel with 250k miles, and 2017 Honda Accord hybrid with 140k miles. The best thing is, paid cash for all. All vehicles have a purpose for us. F150 is our winter vehicle, the Dodge is our tow vehicle and the Honda is our daily driver.
Ah, you're a smart man. The reason you have the Dodge for towing is because you know down the road you will be towing the F150 and Accord when it breaks down on the side of the road. I know I made the right decision replacing my super duty to a ram heavy duty.
The amount it cost to fill up the tank is largely irrelevant. My Mustang cost about $62 to fill up (16 gallon tank but you never run your vehicle completely out of fuel before you fill up, so realistically 15.5 gallons) at $4 per gallon (it's modified and requires 93 octane). It returns about 21 MPG in mixed driving. My F-150 has a 36 gallon fuel tank but runs fine on 87 octane, so I"m spending much more to fill it up; about $121. It gets about 18-19 MPG in mixed driving. However when you break down the cost per mile, both are about the same. But here, she's focusing on the cost to fill the tank which doesn't matter. The cost per mile is what matters if you're overly concerned about the cost of driving.
2014 Sequoia owner here. It's got 148,000 miles. I bought it used in 2019 and since have put on 35,000 miles. I fill it up once or twice a month. Gas isn't a big issue at a little over $100 a month. If I were commuting every day in this beast, that would be a different story. I love being able to haul my family AND my sister-in-laws family in ONE vehicle on occasion.
Yeah, the Sequoia mention did not sit well with me. They hold their value better than almost any car on the market. They go 500-600K miles on original engines and transmissions. It's easily the best large car on the market.
I am proudly #2. I LOVE my 2021 Z71 Tahoe. I will say you missed the mark on the price.......they are around $80k-ish. And if you don't let your tank fall below 3/14 or 1/2 it isn't bad to fill up. I was around 1/2 the other day & I only spend like $36 to fill up and that was paying $3.25 for gas.
Our suburban is a diesel and gets 22mpg city and about 27mpg highway with a 28 gallon tank. We only have to put diesel in it once a month 😄. It can go 700 miles on the highway on a tank. Cost close to $100 to fill.
Nobody's buying a $39k Silverado.... That's a 2wd 2door truck... Realistically any Silverado you ACTUALLY see on the road is at least a $50k truck which is at a base model so to say their price is coming down is poor wording bc they're not.. and to go based off of gas prices on which vehicles are a bad choice is kinda pointless bc that'll be based off where you live and really has nothing to do with the vehicle themselves
As others have stated, fuel tank capacity seems irrelevant, fuel economy is a better metric. Outside of gas though, I think a better metric for this list would've been to compare the 5 year average cost of ownership for each vehicle. As it stands, this is just a list of Googled "10 Vehicles With The Largest Fuel Tanks" and thier EPA fuel economy ratings.
We have a Sequoia and paid cash for it. I would say the Sequoia and Tundra definitely hold the best resale value on your list and are incredibly reliable - and we hold on to our cars forever so to us it’s been worth it. I agree with others the values you have placed on these vehicles are very low and I don’t believe they are accurate purchase prices.
Personally think its worth the "extra cost" to keep my family safe on the road. Toyota Sequoia (bought for less than 5k) still running and has AC and everything we need. Also, arent we supposed to be budgeting for gas?!
I'm not buying someone's problems. I purchased my 09 RAM new. 15yrs later it's still running like new and has lifetime powertrain warranty. ALL those tik noise, covered under warranty, cam shaft and lifters covered under warranty I played the used car game, never ever will I buy used and I keep them very long time
Why discourage new vehicles?? I only buy new but drive them a very long time. I bought my first new car 15 years ago. Mitsubishi outlander. Zero interest. 300k miles currently. Never been in the shop except for maintenance. Nope, no used cars for me. Growing up my mom only got cash cars. Lemons. Had to buy one every couple years. Never felt safe taking a trip.
This is a bit odd to me. Nothing says you have to fill the tank all the way. You could have a vehicle with a 50 gallon tank that is expensive to fill but if it gets 50 miles to the gallon you would rarely have to fill it. Fuel economy is what matter most.
I have 4 large (tall) teenage boys who do a lot of sports and we travel. We have a pacifica currently. Many of your cars on the list we have owned and would consider. Is there a large family vehicle that you agree with or is there a discrimination against large families on your list? Filling up a gas tank is not always a families nemisis.
I have more kids and Rachel has 3 kids herself. They own an Odyssey. Large SUVs aren’t a must when having a large family, it’s a luxury want. If you have somewhere $80k cash laying around, I don’t think she cares that you get any of the vehicles on the list.
At the same token, papa Dave will say; "you do not need any car, you can't afford it!", "ride a bicycle!" "Now, rice and beans, beans and rice so you can step up to a hopti soon, got it?"
I am a fan of this channel but disagree on this video; isn’t it better to have a vehicle that is thristy but does not break, and is durable…? Or have a none reliable that is more economic on gas…? Of course if you want both you need to pick a smaller or EV/PHEV/HEV , etc… One expensive vehicle on repairs overpasses a reliable thristy…🤷🏻
Completely agreed. I do generally agree with the notion of having a more gas efficient vehicle if it can meet your needs, eg go with a Toyota Highlander instead of a Toyota Sequoia if you just need the 3rd row and can get get by with less trunk space. That being said, I would happily stick with a 3-row vehicle for my family that requires limited maintenance, but requires more money to fill up with gas vs a smaller minivan that may be more cost-effective to fill up, but requires regular major repairs. Cost of vehicle ownership should be viewed more holistically, rather than just assessing the cost of gas.
Tundra might be Reliable older trucks, not the new look. 18mpg on the hwy and huge tank. Worst fuel economy ever to own and Worst part is, it's boring. Same look for over 20yrs
All those vehicles on the list are super expensive. Unless you paid in cash for them and it doesn’t exceed 50% of your total income, there way out of your league to begin with. Most of the people owning one of these luxury vehicles have payments on them that are 4 figures. So not worth it.
Fuel capacity is a completely useless metric. The Toyota Sequoia and Tundra (V8, not hybrid BS) do also happen to get awful fuel economy but are 2 of the most reliable vehicles ever built. Will last at least 500k miles with minimal maintenance.
I think we’re allowed to say this was a huge miss. This is purely talking about gas tank. I’d argue this could be a good thing since it means less trips to the gas station. Pretty disappointed on this
It's ridiculously cheap. Under $3/gallon at the moment in the MIdwest US. And it's completely unsustainable. But I live in a city of about 2 million that has no public transportation that is feasible. There's no train from downtown to the airport. I am hopelessly dependent on cheap gas.
This is a disappointing video. Usually Ramsey advice is based upon solid principles but this video is absolute nonsense. The size of the gas tank is irrelevant to the economic impact of inflation. Cost of vehicle ownership is the meaningful metric. If the implication is inflation causes gas prices to rise, then the type of fuel (i.e. Diesel vs. Petrol; Regular vs. Premium) and miles per gallon are the meaningful metrics.
This is the most pointless video ever made by the Ramsey team. How can you not take fuel economy into consideration? I drive an ecodiesel which gets great fuel economy and i spend less per mile than a gasoline engine. This list is just telling you which gasoline vehicles have the biggest fuel tanks because it's only telling you the most expensive to fill up at the pump. And this list does a terrible job of that since there are definitely 11 trucks that have more than 22, 24, 26, etc gallon capacities. I spend about 180 to fill my ecodiesel, but i only fill it once a month with a 30 mile round trip commute to and from work each day. Oh, and tundras never get 23 mpg. I owned a 2018 tundra and it would get a max of 19 mpg. Shoot, most people complain that it only gets 13-15 for them. Probably because they dont know how to drive properly. Bottom line, pointless video when there are several trucks out there with larger tanks which cost more to fill up. There are also vehicles that cost a lot to fill up but also have better fuel economy and you spend less per mile traveled, hence better to own during periods of high inflation. This was a pointless video.
What a dumb episode. Who cares what it costs to fill up???? You really want MPG as a more meaningful number. Car payments are great when you can find a dealer offering 0% interest. Contrary to your statement, a millionaire can't afford new car depreciation. Read Tom Stanleys book, The Millionaire next door. You get to be a millionaire by driving around in a fully depreciated clunker. At least this episode said a car is for getting from A to B.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
What does fuel tank capacity have to do with the cost of ownership? I’d just go with MPG and vehicle cost and maintenance etc.
I totally agree. Key to controlling Auto cost is to not get a vehicle bigger and more gas hungry than you need for your family or for your job. That typically lowers both purchase price as well. Chose carefully and it will lower your maintenance cost as well.
The cost of filling up your tank, which is best practice.
@@cameronmachado1774 But the cost of filling up the tank has nothing to do with the overall cost of of ownership and use of the vehicle. It's just a momentary charge.
Example: Decades ago I had a vehicle with a 30+ gal tank that I filled about once a month.
At the same time I had a car with a tank about half that size that I filled about twice a month
They both about the same gas mileage and for a while I was driving both vehicles about the same mileage. The cost per mile of operation for the gas was essentially the same.
Yes, the vehicle with the large tank cost me twice as much to fill, but I only had to do it half as much as the other vehicle.
@@cameronmachado1774 But the cost of filling up the tank has nothing to do with the overall cost of of ownership and use of the vehicle. It's just a momentary charge.
Example: Decades ago I had a vehicle with a 30+ gal tank that I filled about once a month.
At the same time I had a car with a tank about half that size that I filled about twice a month
They both about the same gas mileage and for a while I was driving both vehicles about the same mileage. The cost per mile of operation for the gas was essentially the same.
Yes, the vehicle with the large tank cost me twice as much to fill, but I only had to do it half as much as the other vehicle.
@perryallan3524 I tend to agree with you, but I can see why Ramsey would include it since they're a personal finance organization and filling up adds up
I have 2003 Ford F150 with 130k miles, 2004 Dodge 2500 diesel with 250k miles, and 2017 Honda Accord hybrid with 140k miles. The best thing is, paid cash for all. All vehicles have a purpose for us. F150 is our winter vehicle, the Dodge is our tow vehicle and the Honda is our daily driver.
Nice
Ah, you're a smart man. The reason you have the Dodge for towing is because you know down the road you will be towing the F150 and Accord when it breaks down on the side of the road. I know I made the right decision replacing my super duty to a ram heavy duty.
Not bad 👍
@@j.l.salayao8055😂
Sequoia owner….i may pay more at the pump, but the reliability of Toyota and my vehicle NOT being in the shop often makes it worth it for our family.
💯 every time!
Yep. Came here to say that about Toyotas. My husband has a tundra.
The amount it cost to fill up the tank is largely irrelevant. My Mustang cost about $62 to fill up (16 gallon tank but you never run your vehicle completely out of fuel before you fill up, so realistically 15.5 gallons) at $4 per gallon (it's modified and requires 93 octane). It returns about 21 MPG in mixed driving. My F-150 has a 36 gallon fuel tank but runs fine on 87 octane, so I"m spending much more to fill it up; about $121. It gets about 18-19 MPG in mixed driving. However when you break down the cost per mile, both are about the same. But here, she's focusing on the cost to fill the tank which doesn't matter. The cost per mile is what matters if you're overly concerned about the cost of driving.
Yesssss!!!!
Honda Odyssey 2006. 264k miles on it. Runs perfectly. ❤
Our f150 holds 36 gallons. I love not filling up as often
2014 Sequoia owner here. It's got 148,000 miles. I bought it used in 2019 and since have put on 35,000 miles. I fill it up once or twice a month. Gas isn't a big issue at a little over $100 a month. If I were commuting every day in this beast, that would be a different story. I love being able to haul my family AND my sister-in-laws family in ONE vehicle on occasion.
Yeah, the Sequoia mention did not sit well with me. They hold their value better than almost any car on the market. They go 500-600K miles on original engines and transmissions. It's easily the best large car on the market.
Summery : big trucks and suvs aren't cheap... Who knew?
I am proudly #2. I LOVE my 2021 Z71 Tahoe. I will say you missed the mark on the price.......they are around $80k-ish. And if you don't let your tank fall below 3/14 or 1/2 it isn't bad to fill up. I was around 1/2 the other day & I only spend like $36 to fill up and that was paying $3.25 for gas.
Our suburban is a diesel and gets 22mpg city and about 27mpg highway with a 28 gallon tank. We only have to put diesel in it once a month 😄. It can go 700 miles on the highway on a tank. Cost close to $100 to fill.
I always wanted to get a Ford Mustang 😊
Nobody's buying a $39k Silverado.... That's a 2wd 2door truck... Realistically any Silverado you ACTUALLY see on the road is at least a $50k truck which is at a base model so to say their price is coming down is poor wording bc they're not.. and to go based off of gas prices on which vehicles are a bad choice is kinda pointless bc that'll be based off where you live and really has nothing to do with the vehicle themselves
As others have stated, fuel tank capacity seems irrelevant, fuel economy is a better metric. Outside of gas though, I think a better metric for this list would've been to compare the 5 year average cost of ownership for each vehicle. As it stands, this is just a list of Googled "10 Vehicles With The Largest Fuel Tanks" and thier EPA fuel economy ratings.
Why does capacity matter lol if anything less fill ups is all
We have a Sequoia and paid cash for it. I would say the Sequoia and Tundra definitely hold the best resale value on your list and are incredibly reliable - and we hold on to our cars forever so to us it’s been worth it. I agree with others the values you have placed on these vehicles are very low and I don’t believe they are accurate purchase prices.
$81K for an Escalade is for the cheapest bare bones trim. Most trims of the Escalade are $100K and up.
Here’s the only costs that matter. Filling a typical dual tank semi is $1600. Meaning transportation costs cost everyone
Size of tank and how much it costs to fill that tank makes no difference. Purchase price, MPG and vehicle reliability is all that matters.
Personally think its worth the "extra cost" to keep my family safe on the road. Toyota Sequoia (bought for less than 5k) still running and has AC and everything we need. Also, arent we supposed to be budgeting for gas?!
My 19 f350 holds 48 gallon
I want the trucklet from Hyundai. That or a Ford F150! 😂
Smiles per mile… rev up that horsepower!
🐎
Nothing like going 100mph on the freeway!
Did that in 2000.. when dinosaurs roamed the earth!
🦖
I'm not buying someone's problems.
I purchased my 09 RAM new.
15yrs later it's still running like new and has lifetime powertrain warranty.
ALL those tik noise, covered under warranty, cam shaft and lifters covered under warranty
I played the used car game, never ever will I buy used and I keep them very long time
Why discourage new vehicles?? I only buy new but drive them a very long time. I bought my first new car 15 years ago. Mitsubishi outlander. Zero interest. 300k miles currently. Never been in the shop except for maintenance. Nope, no used cars for me. Growing up my mom only got cash cars. Lemons. Had to buy one every couple years. Never felt safe taking a trip.
This is a bit odd to me. Nothing says you have to fill the tank all the way. You could have a vehicle with a 50 gallon tank that is expensive to fill but if it gets 50 miles to the gallon you would rarely have to fill it. Fuel economy is what matter most.
I have 4 large (tall) teenage boys who do a lot of sports and we travel. We have a pacifica currently. Many of your cars on the list we have owned and would consider.
Is there a large family vehicle that you agree with or is there a discrimination against large families on your list? Filling up a gas tank is not always a families nemisis.
I have more kids and Rachel has 3 kids herself. They own an Odyssey. Large SUVs aren’t a must when having a large family, it’s a luxury want. If you have somewhere $80k cash laying around, I don’t think she cares that you get any of the vehicles on the list.
At the same token, papa Dave will say; "you do not need any car, you can't afford it!", "ride a bicycle!" "Now, rice and beans, beans and rice so you can step up to a hopti soon, got it?"
I will never understand why all gas cars made today aren't hybrids. I get 40-50 mpg.
I will never buy a used car you’re buying somebody else’s problems!
💯👍🏻
Suburbans are way more than $52k. They are $75-95k where I live.
You only fill up the tank when you drive it.
Dont drive unless you have a reason.
I drove the previous generation Camry and got 46 mpg
It's only "transitory "
Want to look cool… people live in the country too… a van would not get up my lane in rain or snow.
I am a fan of this channel but disagree on this video; isn’t it better to have a vehicle that is thristy but does not break,
and is durable…? Or have a none reliable that is more economic on gas…? Of course if you want both you need to pick a smaller or EV/PHEV/HEV , etc…
One expensive vehicle on repairs overpasses a reliable thristy…🤷🏻
Completely agreed. I do generally agree with the notion of having a more gas efficient vehicle if it can meet your needs, eg go with a Toyota Highlander instead of a Toyota Sequoia if you just need the 3rd row and can get get by with less trunk space.
That being said, I would happily stick with a 3-row vehicle for my family that requires limited maintenance, but requires more money to fill up with gas vs a smaller minivan that may be more cost-effective to fill up, but requires regular major repairs. Cost of vehicle ownership should be viewed more holistically, rather than just assessing the cost of gas.
@@chozendroid Exactly! for example take any Toyota (not the recent smaller engines with turbo (s), and are super durable...
Tundra might be Reliable older trucks, not the new look.
18mpg on the hwy and huge tank.
Worst fuel economy ever to own and Worst part is, it's boring. Same look for over 20yrs
All those vehicles on the list are super expensive. Unless you paid in cash for them and it doesn’t exceed 50% of your total income, there way out of your league to begin with. Most of the people owning one of these luxury vehicles have payments on them that are 4 figures. So not worth it.
This video could have also been ‘Top 11 Most Obnoxious Drivers on the Road’
This video makes no sense on expenses of the car. It’s mph and average annual maintenance costs that matters.
Fuel capacity is a completely useless metric. The Toyota Sequoia and Tundra (V8, not hybrid BS) do also happen to get awful fuel economy but are 2 of the most reliable vehicles ever built. Will last at least 500k miles with minimal maintenance.
I think we’re allowed to say this was a huge miss. This is purely talking about gas tank. I’d argue this could be a good thing since it means less trips to the gas station. Pretty disappointed on this
How about not to buy a new car during an inflation
You can bike!! Better for the enironment and for you! ☺️
Let’s rehearse a little and not read directly off the projector.
Im so jealous of you americans, gas seems so cheap in the us.
It's ridiculously cheap. Under $3/gallon at the moment in the MIdwest US. And it's completely unsustainable. But I live in a city of about 2 million that has no public transportation that is feasible. There's no train from downtown to the airport. I am hopelessly dependent on cheap gas.
BMW=Break My Wallet
This is shockingly dumb...... The tank size is irrelevant....
This is a disappointing video. Usually Ramsey advice is based upon solid principles but this video is absolute nonsense. The size of the gas tank is irrelevant to the economic impact of inflation. Cost of vehicle ownership is the meaningful metric. If the implication is inflation causes gas prices to rise, then the type of fuel (i.e. Diesel vs. Petrol; Regular vs. Premium) and miles per gallon are the meaningful metrics.
This is the most pointless video ever made by the Ramsey team.
How can you not take fuel economy into consideration? I drive an ecodiesel which gets great fuel economy and i spend less per mile than a gasoline engine.
This list is just telling you which gasoline vehicles have the biggest fuel tanks because it's only telling you the most expensive to fill up at the pump. And this list does a terrible job of that since there are definitely 11 trucks that have more than 22, 24, 26, etc gallon capacities.
I spend about 180 to fill my ecodiesel, but i only fill it once a month with a 30 mile round trip commute to and from work each day.
Oh, and tundras never get 23 mpg. I owned a 2018 tundra and it would get a max of 19 mpg. Shoot, most people complain that it only gets 13-15 for them. Probably because they dont know how to drive properly.
Bottom line, pointless video when there are several trucks out there with larger tanks which cost more to fill up. There are also vehicles that cost a lot to fill up but also have better fuel economy and you spend less per mile traveled, hence better to own during periods of high inflation. This was a pointless video.
What a dumb episode. Who cares what it costs to fill up???? You really want MPG as a more meaningful number. Car payments are great when you can find a dealer offering 0% interest. Contrary to your statement, a millionaire can't afford new car depreciation. Read Tom Stanleys book, The Millionaire next door. You get to be a millionaire by driving around in a fully depreciated clunker. At least this episode said a car is for getting from A to B.
Your so beautiful
Is she blind?
Don't discourage people from buying reliable vehicles like toyota. This content is very misleading. Needs cost of repairs and reliability.