@@kerryrhian8341 He's still pure teflon though. Despite his many faults, and the damage he has done to the UK and our political landscape, Farage's political and media instincts are enviable and he is, without doubt, entertaining. Whereas so many other guests were pretty heavily directly grilled and crumbled underneath it, Farage never faced the same scrutiny on the show and was able to play it off, honestly, very well. He stands in contrast with Lembit in just how much more comfortable he seems on TV. The HIGNFY made a mistake by gamifying the scandal in the clip into something light-hearted, it allowed Farage to deploy his typical jokey persona without having to face too much direct grilling. Laughing at one of his party members being a racist is terrible, yet the segment set it up as a joke and the audience laughed along with it.
Still waiting for Paula Venells to be thrown in jail, for life. But like the Water Company Bosses they seem to be beyond the law and allowed to commit series crimes without penalty. Who is receiving all of their back handers, or are they just immune to prosecution ?
That lady was Baroness Trumpington of Sandwich in the county of Kent. At Bletchley during the war, she subsequently championed many bills through the Lords. Is now most famous for sticking up her middle finger at a Lord who she laughingly thought was being too praising during fair well speeches on her retirement.
He didn't. He lived on Eel Pie Island, an eyeot of the Thames. During high tide its average clearance above the water is around 30cm, so I agree, what did he expect?
... and it *was* used. There were two: "Fat man" and "little boy". One on Hiroshima and one on Nagasaki. I don't remember which one was used on what city. But one city got one, and one city got the other. This was taught in High School back in the 70, State-side. I don't know if it's still taught today. But there it is. It belies the argument of "M.A.D." and the "They'll never be used". They were used. Twice. By us; the US. "Mutually Assured Destruction" Yes, that was the whole strategy behind The Cold War.
@@FistandFootMartialArts The notion of mutual assured destruction arose after WWII. Hiroshima and Nagasaki aren't relevant as at the time the Cold War had not begun and there was no other nuclear power to enforce the "mutual" part of the doctrine.
I am puzzled why I am watching this again (only for a few seconds admittedly) after what appears to be only a few days. Not quite sure what the objective is, people will get fairly ticked off fairly soon and walk away, so what's the point?
You really need to reread what you have typed. You've effectively asked them to not post anything different with your appalling misuse of English. Also is is could you and not can you. Try this: Could you post something different? Finally, there is no need to SHOUT!
Watching Farage sweat like a pig was worth the price of admission
Yes absolutely, however, watching Farage giggle about his party members and supporters being homophobic, misogynistic and racist is disgusting.
@@kerryrhian8341 He's still pure teflon though. Despite his many faults, and the damage he has done to the UK and our political landscape, Farage's political and media instincts are enviable and he is, without doubt, entertaining. Whereas so many other guests were pretty heavily directly grilled and crumbled underneath it, Farage never faced the same scrutiny on the show and was able to play it off, honestly, very well. He stands in contrast with Lembit in just how much more comfortable he seems on TV.
The HIGNFY made a mistake by gamifying the scandal in the clip into something light-hearted, it allowed Farage to deploy his typical jokey persona without having to face too much direct grilling. Laughing at one of his party members being a racist is terrible, yet the segment set it up as a joke and the audience laughed along with it.
Still waiting for Paula Venells to be thrown in jail, for life. But like the Water Company Bosses they seem to be beyond the law and allowed to commit series crimes without penalty. Who is receiving all of their back handers, or are they just immune to prosecution ?
1:31 now THATS controversial
These are clips about controversies, not controversial clips
Cheers Jimmy
Baroness Trumpington bears such an uncanny resemblance to the late Queen; they could have been sisters!
A lot of these posh dotty old ladies look the same. Like men in drag.
Sshhhhhh! Official secret 😉
Weren’t they cousins ?
Doesn't look like the Queen at all.
Farrage squirming, lying, and sweating is priceless
The lady in the first part teamed with Ian Hislop...I saw her before on the programme....she was great 😊
That lady was Baroness Trumpington of Sandwich in the county of Kent. At Bletchley during the war, she subsequently championed many bills through the Lords. Is now most famous for sticking up her middle finger at a Lord who she laughingly thought was being too praising during fair well speeches on her retirement.
@@kathrynhobbs8874 She was great on the show.
Paul Daniel’s actually lived on a houseBOAT - moored on the River Thames!
What did he expect?!
How does a houseboat flood, houseboats should rise as the water rises
He didn't. He lived on Eel Pie Island, an eyeot of the Thames. During high tide its average clearance above the water is around 30cm, so I agree, what did he expect?
It was not called "A Fat Man", it was called "Fat Man".
{:o:O:}
If it was falling anywhere near me l wouldn't be worried what the bloody thing was called
... and it *was* used. There were two: "Fat man" and "little boy". One on Hiroshima and one on Nagasaki. I don't remember which one was used on what city. But one city got one, and one city got the other. This was taught in High School back in the 70, State-side. I don't know if it's still taught today. But there it is.
It belies the argument of "M.A.D." and the "They'll never be used". They were used. Twice. By us; the US.
"Mutually Assured Destruction" Yes, that was the whole strategy behind The Cold War.
@@FistandFootMartialArts The notion of mutual assured destruction arose after WWII. Hiroshima and Nagasaki aren't relevant as at the time the Cold War had not begun and there was no other nuclear power to enforce the "mutual" part of the doctrine.
I am puzzled why I am watching this again (only for a few seconds admittedly) after what appears to be only a few days. Not quite sure what the objective is, people will get fairly ticked off fairly soon and walk away, so what's the point?
Hey!
Brits misunderstood Olympic ideals "amateurism" refers to the athletes (formerly) "professionals do the Bribery.
3:01 3:07 3:07 3:11 3:11 3:12 middle class bores
THESE ARE BORING. WE’VE SEEN THEM A MILLION TIMES. CAN YOU NOT POST SOMETHING DIFFERENT?
How are you, Nigel?
You really need to reread what you have typed. You've effectively asked them to not post anything different with your appalling misuse of English.
Also is is could you and not can you. Try this:
Could you post something different?
Finally, there is no need to SHOUT!
Yes, this is satirical show; but the "plan to blow up the Moon" is an urban myth. It was never envisaged as a serious project.