Why Do Most Modern Cars Have Turbo Engines? Are They Going to Be Reliable?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 3.3K

  • @aquapisces24
    @aquapisces24 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +623

    This gentleman is not just a mechanic, he is a true educator.

    • @KarlKokokoho
      @KarlKokokoho 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He is a god for me

    • @nyplantings2420
      @nyplantings2420 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Personality and tone of voice with how we are spoken to is just as important as the subject for the way many of us learn.

    • @himanshutripathi7441
      @himanshutripathi7441 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes he is
      I am amazed❤❤❤❤

    • @Mecanicaencasa
      @Mecanicaencasa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A stand up guy just like his father. He is an OK guy. A fucking marine.

  • @frankbiz
    @frankbiz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +964

    When I listen to you I feel like I'm in a collage classroom listening to the best professor on the subject. Thank you so much for giving us your valuable time.

    • @truckerrickakamanowar
      @truckerrickakamanowar 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yes!

    • @gosman949
      @gosman949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      he is not that good. A professor he is not.

    • @timradde4328
      @timradde4328 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

      @@gosman949 He's better than you. And I like him for what he does.

    • @weroliera
      @weroliera 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@gosman949he actually is professor from Harvard.

    • @gosman949
      @gosman949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@timradde4328 I am an educator, so I know what I'm talking about!

  • @Rottieman-h6d
    @Rottieman-h6d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    You are the “ gold standard “ of TH-cam automotive videos. The explanations are very much appreciated. I’m retired from the automotive biz. We drive Toyotas because they will give us the least amount of problems. I would suggest anyone who owns a Lexus or Toyota listen and learn from this man. Thanks for the vids. 👍

    • @dmimcg
      @dmimcg หลายเดือนก่อน

      I love my FIAT 500. Vote for Kamala!

    • @handlesrtwitterdontbelivethem
      @handlesrtwitterdontbelivethem หลายเดือนก่อน

      removed from youtube project farm is the gold standard above all

    • @YouTubePseudonym
      @YouTubePseudonym หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not knocking you but EVs will give you the least amount of problems, not Toyota

    • @mesomemore97
      @mesomemore97 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@TH-camPseudonym
      Have you ever tried to change a flat tire on an EV?

    • @kennymccormick8295
      @kennymccormick8295 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@dmimcg80 IQ voter.

  • @bohdanked
    @bohdanked 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +513

    One of the best down to earth explanation of turbos on TH-cam

    • @joesmith7377
      @joesmith7377 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Can somebody point the time stamp where is this question (Why Do Most Modern Cars Have Turbo Engines?) answered?

    • @DeepOceanDiver
      @DeepOceanDiver 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joesmith7377 th-cam.com/video/zthdvOkkMmU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=NbhxZuxTgBrQqV-e&t=123

    • @craigcraigster4999
      @craigcraigster4999 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@joesmith737721:34

    • @KevinConvertito
      @KevinConvertito 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joesmith7377 3:50 Emissions is the reason given.
      th-cam.com/video/zthdvOkkMmU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=uddqnlEn0s0e-gi8&t=230

    • @philipsmb9076
      @philipsmb9076 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@joesmith7377 21:33. Emission, emission, emission. Just like the auto start-stop feature.

  • @H.pylori
    @H.pylori 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +581

    The only problem with this excellent video is that this man's shop is not in my city.

    • @DJNoMask
      @DJNoMask 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      It’s worth the 20hr trip

    • @starrisk
      @starrisk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      20hr flight for me

    • @Tragick_Sin
      @Tragick_Sin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      40 minite drive for me

    • @brucekrolikowski2882
      @brucekrolikowski2882 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Agree, unfortunately he's not even in my state, lol

    • @coloradoboo1071
      @coloradoboo1071 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I know!! I bet many of us have Map quested to see how far away we are!!

  • @dbsantanapr
    @dbsantanapr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Not that I want a car with a turbo, but if it’s unavoidable I will happily drive and maintain it according to your instructions. Thanks!

  • @justinbosley7830
    @justinbosley7830 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +250

    This is hands down the best automotive channel on TH-cam. I even told my 66 year old father who worked 40 years in the automotive trade about and he loves it!

    • @bobfox2733
      @bobfox2733 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes many TH-cam videos reviews don’t go this indebted on vehicles they review. One of the best channels on TH-cam. The car care nut could save many from choosing a more problematic issues.

    • @pedrofernandez8729
      @pedrofernandez8729 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Scotty Kilmer without the BS or click bait.

    • @DiscipleofChrist101
      @DiscipleofChrist101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      2nd next to Scotty Kilmer. Close 2nd.

    • @ethannguyen7562
      @ethannguyen7562 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@bobfox2733I hope car care nut open a shop in my area. 😊

    • @pauldichtel6410
      @pauldichtel6410 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TCCN Automotive services 1:37 my 2004 V6 SLE Solara.

  • @prakashnarismulu3332
    @prakashnarismulu3332 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +234

    Owned and ran a number of BMW turbos diesel and petrol for past 25 years. No issues . Tip is to follow gentle warm up throttle on cold start and to allow the engine to idle for one minute on shut down to cool down the engine oil and turbo cooling effect . Great review .

    • @dsk-xx
      @dsk-xx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like Germans, you must have a problem for every solution.

    • @frankharley1000
      @frankharley1000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      We do just that with our helicopters. Upon returning from a flight, the pilots run the rotor blades at the equivalent of a fast idle for several minutes to circulate cooled lubricants through the engine and transmission.

    • @TRONABORON
      @TRONABORON 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Diesel! Much better...

    • @jeffreyb1451
      @jeffreyb1451 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      My 24 GMC Canyon 2.7 has an electric pump that continues coolant flow to turbo after shutoff for this reason. Also motor oil goes from filter straight to turbo first for cleanest oil. GM did a smart thing with the 2.7 High Output motor.

    • @brians8607
      @brians8607 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Bottom line, no these new turbo engines are not going to last as long as the previous generation. That's why I purchased a late 5th gen 4runner instead of a new turbo version. Don't ever buy a used turbo vehicle. You have no record of how it was driven or how it was maintained. To make one last longer let it warm up after start before driving, let it cool several minutes before shutdown, keep your foot out of it when driving, perform maintenance at least at half recommended intervals. In other words to make your turbo vehicle last baby the crap out of it.

  • @RareGenXer
    @RareGenXer 19 วันที่ผ่านมา +16

    So in short: onerous government CAFE regulations have ruined automobile engines and dramatically raised their cost, maintenance and complexity while at the same time reduced their reliability.

    • @grundian
      @grundian 13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      In short: If you want to invest in something, buy low mileage 2007 Toyota Avalons and 2008 Honda Accords.

  • @mikemayne001
    @mikemayne001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +508

    The wise Car Nut said it best, maintenance. I have a 2016 Cummins Ram diesel. I drop the oil plug every 4,000 miles, no exceptions! Ram recommends 10,000 mile intervals, that’s why the dealer shops are full of broken down trucks. I have 211,000 miles on my Ram, zero issues. But I maintain it to a very high level. Nobody does maintenance of any kind anymore. Such a shame not to take care of your vehicle with the new car prices as high as they are.

    • @KeithStarr
      @KeithStarr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      This guy knows. I'd rather pay for oil than things that rely on it.

    • @azpete6436
      @azpete6436 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      While I whole heartedly agree with frequent oil changes, comparing a turbo diesel with a turbo gas engine is like apples and oranges. I would prefer a turbo diesel vs a naturally aspirated diesel, but I have no desire to own a turbo gas engine.
      One of the primary issues I have with the current turbo gas engines, is the requirement to pull the engine to service the turbo, when it fails.

    • @rc666
      @rc666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I never change oil.

    • @JollyGiant19
      @JollyGiant19 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@azpete6436So the issue isn’t turbos, it’s bad engineering.

    • @markkus1134
      @markkus1134 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@rc666lol my uncle never did on his Toyota 22r back in the 1980’s trucks lasted well over 100k!!! Alvin would say oh hell just add a quart of 30 weight!

  • @philipbearly6620
    @philipbearly6620 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +626

    I worked at a nuclear power plant for 23 years. Our 2 standby emergency generator sets were 2 1000 hp Caterpillar V12's coupled tail to tail with generator between (yes, one ran backwards). Each engine had 2 turbos, one for each bank. In our training, we learned that turbo speed and power is a function of unburnt fuel, yes, the fuel is still burning in the exhaust turbine, and turbos run at 80,000 to 200,000 rpms under full load/ engine speed. Our exhaust piping was too long (back pressure) due to building design, and I have seen the cast iron housing literally glowing red hot due to that. It meant down rating the gen sets by several hundred kilowatts. We had to disassemble and inspect each turbo every 3 months, then they had to pass emergency startup testing weekly. These gen sets would go from shutdown to full rpm/ load within 4 seconds. Each engine had 2 air starters at 250 psi air pressure to achieve 4 second load pick time. One time an intercooler leaked cooling water into intake manifold, causing 8 of 12 cylinders to be hydrolocked. That engine did not turn 3 degrees when they did the weekly test. This incident caused full overhaul/inspection of each engine. It was astonishing when I pulled out the precombustion chambers/injectors and saw standing water in the piston tops!

    • @michael74556
      @michael74556 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      fascinating

    • @PrinceAlberts
      @PrinceAlberts 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      That’s an interesting setup. I wonder why they didn’t go with a wider exhaust pipe to alleviate the back pressure.

    • @PieterBreda
      @PieterBreda 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I didn't know normal engines could run backwards. I heard some marine diesels could do it.

    • @Kamal_AL-Hinai
      @Kamal_AL-Hinai 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Nice! How's the pay working in a nuclear power plant?

    • @Horatio1886build
      @Horatio1886build 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank you for that info. And I am moving away from nuc plant😲isn't cooling kinda important in nuc reactors.( sarc)

  • @BillinSD
    @BillinSD 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Reliability is suffering. Not will, IS. You always bring a good conversation and leave it to consumers to decide. Thank you

  • @needmoney666
    @needmoney666 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1754

    My strategy for dealing with this question is to never buy a car having a turbo engine.

    • @theshootindutchman
      @theshootindutchman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      Amen!

    • @goharhayat2489
      @goharhayat2489 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

      Same, one of my regular cars I recently bought is a Ae111 corolla 1997 with a 1.6 4afe engine. One owner car 34,000 miles when I purchased it. I'm confident his will out live any new corolla mechanically with ease.

    • @star9732
      @star9732 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

      Every year that passes this becomes harder.

    • @JollyGiant19
      @JollyGiant19 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

      Why? Turbos aren’t an indicator of unreliability.
      Toyota has legendarily reliable turbo vehicles going back decades that people even tune! and trust their life to all over the world.

    • @robertosantos-vx6pn
      @robertosantos-vx6pn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Man you made it sound so complicated. 😂😂😂😂

  • @AlbertaDMode
    @AlbertaDMode 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    By far this is the BEST mechanical engineering review of all pros and cons of turbo vs naturally aspirated. Again, I've learned so much more about turbo engines, especially when a turbo doesn't do much during cruising speed. Thank you again for all your hard work, sir!

    • @guyfawkesuThe1
      @guyfawkesuThe1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Turbos do not last forever. Average life of a turbo is what, about 100K miles??

    • @noob.168
      @noob.168 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's why turbo engines save gas - you don't need that much power for cruise.

  • @speakeasy6383
    @speakeasy6383 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    I truly enjoy your videos. I'm almost 60 and have owned many vehicles which I maintained properly. I've never had a engine failure. Just bought a 2.5L turbo vehicle and look forward to many miles ahead.

  • @dw8555
    @dw8555 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +196

    PLEASE create a video on CVTs... driving conditions that shorten their lives, how to drive to lengthen their lives, maintenance. Good CVTs and not so good CVTs.
    Thank you for all you do for us!!!

    • @hsew
      @hsew 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      The only CVTs worth buying are eCVTs found in some hybrids (Toyota uses them). Unlike your typical belt-driven CVT which lasts maybe 120k miles, eCVTs use planetary gears. In short, they’re far more durable than typical belt-driven CVTs.

    • @truckercowboyed2638
      @truckercowboyed2638 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@hsewthey didn't ask for opinions but actual facts from a mechanic ...

    • @poopy_pants_joe1194
      @poopy_pants_joe1194 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@truckercowboyed2638 He didn't give an opinion. He stated fact.

    • @theskyizblue2day431
      @theskyizblue2day431 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@truckercowboyed2638here are the facts. Good cvt’s:
      Bad cvt’s: all of them

    • @johnjohnson2855
      @johnjohnson2855 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      I’ve got 382,000 miles on my 2014 Toyota Corolla CVT without any issues. But I change out the fluid every 35,000 miles. Don’t trust their lifetime fluid bullshit.

  • @CrackerSmith
    @CrackerSmith 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    I've had multiple turbo cars since the 80s models. I've broken some and learned a little for the others. If you drive turbo cars hard, you really need to change the oil every 2500-3500 miles / 6 months. and let it cool down properly. Taking it real easy the last 10% of the way home and letting it idle for a few minutes before turning it off usually achieves this easily. Meanwhile, I can beat up on my N/A vehicles all day and change oil every 5k/ 6 months. I am going to so miss these N/A era cars!

    • @sana-cm7oc
      @sana-cm7oc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Change the laws and defund the EPA.

    • @Duran762
      @Duran762 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I always treated my NA engines nice anyway so turbo is just better for me in every way. Now I actually have to be nice to it 😂

    • @timschultes6467
      @timschultes6467 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The Mustang still has a N/A V8 with the 5.0. It’s 500hp all natural.

    • @Tachyon836
      @Tachyon836 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Turbo timers can help with this problem as it keeps the oil circulating from the turbo to prevent it from collecting and burning in the hot side of the turbo overnight as it cools.

    • @NoName-oj5km
      @NoName-oj5km หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@timschultes6467 Exactly. Why have a turbo, when you can achieve good power with N/A

  • @walawala-fo7ds
    @walawala-fo7ds 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    In glad you did this. So many people forget Toyota has had turbos for ages, including the Hilux. Nobody says the Hilux turbo is bad

    • @iamrobot396
      @iamrobot396 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Does t mean the avg turbo in other cars is good. They are still Toyota for a reason

    • @jonathasfigaro4992
      @jonathasfigaro4992 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Diesel solid engine and turbo. Not petrol downsizing engines

    • @tonyroy4373
      @tonyroy4373 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The problem is that company downsize their engine and drop a turbo on them. Add a 4000 lbs suv on top and you don't have to be a genius to know that you will get problems with it

    • @luckyguy600
      @luckyguy600 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. My whole 1975 Hilux was bio-degradable.
      I never sold mine. I just used a broom and swept it up into the trash can.
      One small piece of junk!

    • @robertmisiuk7137
      @robertmisiuk7137 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Diesel turbos work better than their gas counter parts. They are driven differently. Turbos in a gas truck towing, hope you are going a short distance. Or you are changing your oil after each tow. Watch TFL truck and see them kill trucks with turbos.

  • @wjgrandcherokee
    @wjgrandcherokee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Thanks for the explanation! I was an automotive tech for GM for 20 years and no longer do it. I watch your videos and love that you explain everything in detail. This is great because I love to stay up with the knowledge of the automotive world. I also never really learned the correct difference between a twin scroll or sequential turbo. Every day with nothing learned is a day wasted. Thank you a million times over for teaching me something new!!

  • @eddieBoxer
    @eddieBoxer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    The car nut mechanic is the best top of the line mechanic on TH-cam.

  • @ronmorrell9809
    @ronmorrell9809 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    In addition to reducing turbo lag, twin-scroll technology reduces exhaust back pressure.
    The air-fuel mixture is still burning and expanding as it exits the cylinder. The continued expansion in the exhaust manifold, continuing after the exhaust valve closes, spins the turbo. However, almost immediately after one exhaust valve closes, the next one opens. Because the exhaust manifold is still full of pressurised, burning material, crankshaft power is required to push-out the contents of the second (and all future) cylinder.
    Twin-scroll turbos use two separate exhaust manifold passages. After the 1st passage's exhaust valve closes, the next opening valve fills the 2nd (empty) passage. By the time the 3rd valve opens into the 1st passage, that passage is empty, with no back pressure.
    The nozzle from one passage is aimed at the outer portion of the turbine blades for maximum torque while spooling up. The other nozzle aims closer to the axle for sustaining maximum turbine spin.
    Understanding the ability of small engines to not need turbo boost in steady state driving,, depends on realizing a car needs less than 20 hp to maintain 60mph on a level surface .

    • @Jay-me7gw
      @Jay-me7gw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is only true on engines with many cylinders feeding into the turbine though. twin turbo V6's only have 3 cylinders feeding into each turbine so the exhaust pulses are spread out enough that the twin scroll isnt buying you anything.
      Twin scroll is really only going to be benficial in a 4 or 6 cylinder feeding a single turbo.

  • @timrisch4540
    @timrisch4540 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    Very good video. A couple of comments:
    I have owned 3 turbo cars in my life. The latest has almost 180,000 miles on the original engine and turbo and shows no sign of wearing out. I have never had any problems due to the turbo in any of the cars I have owned. But, I change the oil (synthetic) every 5,000 miles. That is a key to keeping turbo cars running without fail as you correctly point out.
    One clarification, I heard you say the inlet gas gets hot because the turbo is hot. That is true, but the main reason the inlet gas gets hot is because it is compressed by the turbo. The compression adds work to the gas which is converted to heat in the compression. Even if the turbo is completely cold, the gas would still get hot due to the compression. The primary role of the intercooler is remove the heat generated by the compression from the turbo, not the just the heat absorbed from the hot turbo itself.
    Thanks again for a good video.

    • @IsItTrueThat
      @IsItTrueThat 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is the problem with the intake air being hot? Why does it need to be cooled? It's already compressed so cooling it so it is compressed more doesn't make sense to me. In the old days, high temp combustion used to created Oxides of Nitrogen which was a pollutant and thus attempts were made to lower combustion temperatures. Might that be the reason?

    • @Marbind
      @Marbind 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@IsItTrueThat Hot air is not as dense as cold air.
      Less oxygen is found on hot air. The engine will make less power because of that.

    • @singular9
      @singular9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@IsItTrueThat because knock mitigation. Hot air under pressure has a higher chance of knock.

    • @chrispatel3695
      @chrispatel3695 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely right man turbo engine has fun to drive 4 inline Toyota makes

  • @Shododaan
    @Shododaan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

    Your "cool down" comment about turbos reminds me of a story when I first started with my company 30 years ago. One day I came into work and people were clapping, high-fiving me and smiling all the way to my desk. I was clueless and thought I was being pranked. What actually happened is a manager that treated me (and many others) like dog-pooh for years had his car catch on fire and burn to the pavement at work. They laughed and thought maybe I did it because he treated me the worst of all of us but no.. he treated his turbo car like he treated his underlings. He ran them hard and never let up. Turns out he ran the turbocharged car one too many times hard all the way to work and parked without letting it cool down. It ignited at 7am in the parking lot about 30 minutes after he arrived and about 30 minutes before I arrived. Good times.

    • @drcovell
      @drcovell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Karma is a patient bitch, isn’t she? 😂

    • @symmetry08
      @symmetry08 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      after 30 mins ? That took too long time to ignite

    • @AddyEspresso
      @AddyEspresso 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It makes sense to run a car hard but its clear from this story that abuse was his MO

    • @simonr23
      @simonr23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lovely story, but unrelated to benefits of cooling down the turbo before shutting off the engine.

    • @Shododaan
      @Shododaan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@simonr23 Did you read it? I guess it was not a "benefit" story but more of a cautionary tale of not letting the engine/oil/turbo cool off before turning the ignition off. Be safe.

  • @FraGRINtWoOkiE
    @FraGRINtWoOkiE 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    As a South African Mercedes Benz specialist, been working in the trade qualified for almost 15 years. Now working at an independent shop and own business from home. I can agree, oil changes is the easiest way to save a motor. Use decent oil, but rather change it more frequently. I personally drive a 95 2.2 SEI Camry Manual and a 96 Astra F.. With those 2 I don`t need a modern car. My toyota is my go to for daily and for long trip use. the astra F is for fun and stuffing around. Keep the good advice going and good luck with your shop. This is the 7th video I`ve seen and want to thank you for the good input expert advise that you give not only to viewers , but to customers instead of just taking what they or other shops said at face value. Merc also has a 20000km service interval, we set it down to 15 minimum, but recommend 5 to 10 k oil changes. The Stealerships only expect the car to last the warranty period.Thanks again for proving there are good mechanics out there, not just trying to scoop your cash. we take pride in what we do.

  • @UncleRayRayGarageEmporium
    @UncleRayRayGarageEmporium 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    Another turbo tip: When ambient temps are low, you must run the engine long enough to heat up the whole engine and turbo. If not, the water vapor in the exhaust will condense on the inside of the piping and housing. That water will cause parts to rust and significantly reduce the life of shafts, bearings, housings, and oil. It also leaves a spot that is only water to reduce startup lubrication, corrode AND freeze.
    I didnt know that was a thing until my buddy's turbo died during the winter. He literally cried, and i didn't blame him.

    • @dylanjones7655
      @dylanjones7655 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      This is very common most notable ford 3.5 eco boost. Condensation buildup.

    • @tom_hoots
      @tom_hoots 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Moral of the story: GOOD FREAKING LUCK if you're stupid enough to buy a used vehicle with a turbocharged engine. LIKE HELL you can possibly believe that the previous owner(s) have done the kind of extra maintenance these engines require.

    • @imnotusingmyrealname4566
      @imnotusingmyrealname4566 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No short trips!

    • @artemiscool67
      @artemiscool67 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@tom_hoots there's as many if not more cars w/ turbocharged cars in the last decade, so used turbo cars are quite the norm. It's not like the options are the same as the 90's.
      With that said, you can be fine w/ a used turbo engine if you do your pre-owned homework

    • @davidmann4533
      @davidmann4533 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Just stay away from turbos and your life will be less complicated😂

  • @jeffer1101
    @jeffer1101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    While the emissions reason is valid, fuel economy is the main thing. However, it's not quite that simple. If you have a vehicle with a 2.0L turbo engine and are cruising on the highway at 70 mph, the engine is likely revving relatively low and there won't be too much load on the engine (so the amount of boost will be minimal). This would enable your vehicle to get decent fuel economy, and use less fuel than if you had a 3.0L V6 or 4.0L V8 in it. But that is only part of the story. The real factor is power. If you are driving around town and applying an amount of throttle requesting 200 HP, your engine will burn the amount of fuel required to produce that much power regardless if it is a 2.0L turbo 4 cylinder or a 3.0L V6 or a 4.0L V8. The whole "no replacement for displacement" is key. Back in the muscle car era, you'd have a 5L V8 with 350 hp. Now, you can simply use a 2.5L Turbo 4 cylinder to make the same power. How do you do that, it's half the displacement? Simple, dump twice the air and fuel into so you are using the same amount of air and fuel as the 5L V8. This is why when you look at the real world fuel economy numbers of most modern small turbo vehicles, they aren't really that great. The reason is these small (and not very powerful) engines are often running on boost to make the power people want, which in turn isn't really saving them any fuel. If you want a 250 hp vehicle, it won't matter if it has a 3L V6 or 1.5L Turbo 3 cylinder. It is going to take the same amount of fuel to make 250 hp. The "hope" is people won't often want so much power, so these smaller engines, when not in boost, won't use much fuel, which in term makes them "better on gas". But that's only the case if you keep them out of boost, which is harder in these modern cars since their engines are very small and purposely undersized. That makes them decent on fuel economy when the loads requested are low (like cruising on a highway at 60 mph), but most people don't drive like that.

    • @ghostwrench2292
      @ghostwrench2292 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yours is one of the very few comments here from somebody who understands turbocharging.

    • @MikeR55
      @MikeR55 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent info, thanks.

    • @Jay-me7gw
      @Jay-me7gw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The fundamental part that you are missing is that a larger NA motor has pumping losses if its not using all of its available torque. The throttle plate is closed, which puts the intake manifold in vacuum, and the pistons have to pull against that vacuum, which works against the engine's rotation.
      A smaller displacement motor will operate closer to WOT to make the same amount of power. That means the throttle plate is open more and the manifold wont be in vacuum. The engine is not fighting itself. Throw a turbo on there and that engine can not only operate with no manifold vacuum at light loads but still produce power at higher loads.
      Its the same reason most V8's are displacement on demand now. You run a 5.3L V8 as a 2.65L in a half ton truck and runs closer to WOT just traveling down the freeway so the engine is not fighting a vacuum in the manifold.
      Once both engines are close to WOT then the difference goes away because now you are up against the energy contained in the fuel. At some point the fuel is your limiting factor.

    • @MarkBush-en5cz
      @MarkBush-en5cz หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gasoline = 10 HP/gallon/hour
      Diesel = 20 HP/gallon/hour
      No way to get around the limit of the fuel.

    • @ghostwrench2292
      @ghostwrench2292 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MarkBush-en5cz No question there is more energy in diesel vs gasoline, but gasoline burns cleaner, so diesel engines require so many more parts to clean the exhaust.

  • @chickmcgee1000
    @chickmcgee1000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My brother and I bought new F150 TwinTurbo eco-boost trucks in 2012. Until I told it out getting a deer, my head 250,000 miles with no problems, he still driving his with 350k. The first thing we thought we’d be doing, possibly timing chain? Frequent oil changes. And we never really ran them hard. Always enjoy and learn from your channel.

  • @JimmyMakingitwork
    @JimmyMakingitwork 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Great explanation. Many don't seem to realize that modern turbocharged engines are designed from the start to use a turbocharger, with beefier blocks, rods, cooling systems and so on. Once most realize this they should realize that life expectancy isn't reduced, IF maintenance is done properly. That is the only real caveat.

    • @drcovell
      @drcovell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      *Big* if! 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @michaelsecomb4115
      @michaelsecomb4115 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      If turbo engines are designed properly they should be reliable.

    • @sentree9857
      @sentree9857 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      100% true…but they typically have more parts thus more things to potentially break.

    • @2driverpls652
      @2driverpls652 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Heat and high pressure. You will not get 100k miles

    • @michaelsecomb4115
      @michaelsecomb4115 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@2driverpls652 already have.

  • @nealkaye9056
    @nealkaye9056 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Excellent video. Very informative. I purchased a 2024 Honda Accord EX last year which has a 1.5 L 4cylinder turbo-charged engine. It drives better than my previous vehicle, a 2014 Mercedes-Benz C350 which had a naturally aspirated V6. The turbo on the Honda is coolant/oil cooled and has no noticeable turbo-lag. I drive conservatively so the turbo is probably not spinning at a high rpm most of the time, and I change the oil every 5K miles.

    • @user-gq2vn1xj2r
      @user-gq2vn1xj2r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good comment. It is really a good engine. I find I can drive with a very light foot due to the flat torque curve. Way better than my older Subaru.

  • @anyndel
    @anyndel 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hands down one of the best educational channels on TH-cam, not just on cars, on any subject

  • @marcelomjm5582
    @marcelomjm5582 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    my 2011 MAZDA Speed 3 with 200.000 miles still running strong all stock , Mazda are very reliable cars, I never issues with turbo in my speed3.

    • @ponderingfox
      @ponderingfox 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Same. My clutch came and went, but the turbo is still a very good time.

    • @dowayigu1277
      @dowayigu1277 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      wow,
      same here my Pajero 2011 with 200k miles too🎉

    • @Thenatureboy801
      @Thenatureboy801 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I had a 2013 speed 3 and pulled just as hard at 50k miles as it did at 125k. Great car.

    • @SavScorp22
      @SavScorp22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Holy shit I haven't seen one of those in a while. One of my exes bought a Mazdaspeed protege when we were together. It was a fun little car!

  • @hoppysport2872
    @hoppysport2872 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    This is a truly relatable masterclass by an expert! I have a 2008 SAAB 9-5, bought new in 2012 as a GM leftover after they cut SAAB loose. Paid $17,000 for a $38,000 car. It's been incredibly reliable. Now have 136,000 miles. I change my Mobil 1 full synthetic every 3,000 miles and also have a turbo timer for proper shutdown.
    Since new I have rarely gunned the engine...only on ramp type acceleration. The turbocharger is a single scroll Mitsubishi TD04, a quality turbo.
    I was told by my SAAB master tech that if properly cared for, I can get 200k to 250k miles out of the turbo.

    • @SunshineSailing84
      @SunshineSailing84 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I blew the turbo on my ‘98 9-3 convertible in a traffic jam. Lots of smoke, most oil burned in no-time. Called the shop owner who said: ‘drive over here no problem’. I drove the 20 mile to the shop without a problem. You could hear the valves clicking without oil. Mechanic: ‘the engines are so tough, you van drive a good while witbout oil, slowly’. New turbo was 1200 euros including work, not too bad.

    • @leahcim38
      @leahcim38 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's true. We have a family saab over 240k on the clock.

    • @blackrifle6736
      @blackrifle6736 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      *HKS Turbo Timer for the win! TT has endured since 1982 because they just flat work!*

  • @how_bout_it7967
    @how_bout_it7967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you dearly for this video. We purchased our 1st turbocharged Toyota, and i like knowing how everything operates. You're seriously THE MAN. You are continuously keeping countless amounts of people educated on their vehicles.

  • @tarasco888
    @tarasco888 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Agree 100% with you on oil changes. I've driven the same 18 wheeler for 800k miles with the original engine and turbo with zero turbo issues, although I'm not a mechanic I'm sure on time oil changes have played a big part. Love your videos my friend, keep up the good work!

    • @Sc0tt69
      @Sc0tt69 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      NO COMPARISON between diesel and gas turbo engines.
      I would never buy a gas turbo.

    • @davidpowell3347
      @davidpowell3347 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I believe the turbo works better with the Diesel because the Diesel most of the time under load has a lower exhaust gas temperature than a gasoline engine under similar load.

    • @kthendrix8
      @kthendrix8 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I completely agree with you! I drove large fire engines for twenty plus years with many different environments and driving conditions. It doesn’t matter if it is a Cummins or a Detroit, the way that the engine is configured with transmission (preferably Allison) and the cooling system is going to make or break the engine, turbo and all. It took due diligence to preserve the integrity of the engine with constant monitoring of all of the functions to get the maximum effort out of it especially when you are on scene at different RPM’s (pumping of water, battery maintenance for the generator, or idle) for possibly hours on end. We had to change out many of the fluids based off of hours that it ran, but also how long it had been sitting in the barn (engine heaters will eat away at radiators if the engine does not get out and circulate the fluids). The problem that I have with turbo engines in smaller vehicles is that it seems that vehicle manufactures just slapped a turbo onto the existing engine and not changing the actual structure of the engine to be able to handle the additional pressure and heat to be able to last a long time like a large overland diesel engine. Yes, you are meeting emission standards, but at what cost? More oil and fluid changes (more liquid pollution), more blown engines (like the six cylinder Tundra) which makes for more waste, or just junking the whole vehicle because it cannot be mechanically saved. I am a firm believer in being able to test out a mechanical device extensively to make sure that the mass market can be assured that it works properly in the real world, but the reports are coming back from all manufacturers that the turbo engines are not meeting those expectations which concerns the people who purchase their vehicles wanting to keep them for the long haul with minimal repairs with scheduled maintenance.

  • @genehart261
    @genehart261 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    A co-worker had a turbocharged 1987 Buick Grand National. 3.8 liters and crazy-fast, he got 300,000 trouble-free miles from that car.

    • @despairfollows591
      @despairfollows591 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Outlier. Those old Buicks were bulletproof

    • @isaiahmountford5815
      @isaiahmountford5815 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@despairfollows591what about the countless million mile turbo engines out there?

    • @thunderbird66613
      @thunderbird66613 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I believe the Grand National has a Super Charger

    • @vauxittt
      @vauxittt หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@thunderbird66613 no it doesn't, it has a turbo engine

  • @glenimpey4168
    @glenimpey4168 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Long time watcher and Toyota nut for the last 15 years .Thank you for your advice we own CVT Corolla and I have an RZ Camry. Love both cars.Had a 90s Corolla manual before and an old Camry 2Lt. Toyota fan for life!

  • @jimrossabrena7955
    @jimrossabrena7955 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    AMD, I cannot express how much I love your videos. Thank you for this educational video. You covered how the turbo works and the pros and cons 👏

  • @gregorbabic7664
    @gregorbabic7664 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I had a 2002 Saab 9-5 with the low pressure Garrett turbo that was known to fail at around 100,000kms.
    I changed the oil with synthetic around every 5000kms (mixed driving, not that much highway).
    When I sold the car it was still on the original turbo and the car was almost at 200,000kms.
    It was an amazing engine that would get 5-6l/100kms when cruising on the highway. But lots of power and almost no turbo lag.
    Change the oil often, don’t beat on it, and you don’t have to worry about turbos.

    • @ericbennik2071
      @ericbennik2071 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My suzuki s cross station wagon di turbo gets 4.5 to 5l/100km on the highway and accelerates well (sqm 16.0)

    • @VulcanXIV
      @VulcanXIV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's funny because even just changing the oil is too much to ask for in the average driver, I'd say even most.

  • @ibrewbeer
    @ibrewbeer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I've owned 6 turbocharged Volvo's over 35 years and have NEVER had an issue with the turbo. Only used full synthetic oil every 5-7k miles.

  • @marka980
    @marka980 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    One of the biggest reasons there is a lack of maintenance, I think, is because a large majority of people lease their cars instead of buying them, because of the high price of modern vehicles. When I was in high school, early 80's, my neighbor bought a new Chevy Silverado 4x4 for $18,000. It was a extended cab with a 8 foot bed. When people lease their vehicles, they don't worry about long term effects from lack of maintenance, but the 2nd and 3rd owners end up having to pay for it. It took me 5 months to find the truck I wanted, spec'd the way I wanted it. No turbo, a v6 with leather and HID headlights in my price range. A 2022 Nissan Frontier SV crew cab 4x4. And then I drove 7 hrs to go buy it. I saved $14,000 over new price. I change the oil and rotate the tires every 3-3.5k miles. I never in my life thought I'd ever buy a Nissan, but it fit the bill when nothing else did, and I love it. Change your oil, people.

    • @Anomize23
      @Anomize23 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Leasing is another form of renting. 😂NO THANKS ✋

    • @fs5866
      @fs5866 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Leasing is more expensive than buying lol,idk why you think leasing is cheap.

    • @luisvilla799
      @luisvilla799 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Man I want that Nissan so bad what is the total price

    • @maddhatter0
      @maddhatter0 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Man I hope it works out for you. I have seen so many horror stores on those exact trucks. Good luck!

    • @markh4750
      @markh4750 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "a large majority of people lease their cars instead of buying them" This is factually incorrect. Only about 1/4 of consumers lease their cars.

  • @davepalmerton2429
    @davepalmerton2429 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    A great explanation in simple terms. CCN you are the best.

  • @dperreno
    @dperreno 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Good video. Having worked for 2 major automakers as an engineer (and then in finance), I completely agree with your explanation. I have avoided owning any turbo-equipped vehicle because 1) I didn't need the additional power and 2) I didn't want to deal with the added complexity. Now my vehicles are all electrified (hybrid, PHEV, and EV) so I am getting my boost from electrons instead of turbos. Also, your bit about maintenance is spot on. When I was growing up in the '60's and '70's, we were constantly changing oil, repacking bearings, replacing mufflers, doing brake jobs (drum brakes, front and rear), putting on snow tires, etc. Had to do a valve job after only 5 years or so. Yes, cars were simpler back then, but they actually required much MORE maintenance, which we were aware of and which we did do.

  • @kurona
    @kurona 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    8:35 I'm so glad Toyota let us hear a bit of that turbo sound in the GR Corolla, it brings out that inner child in me every time I drive it.

  • @dairyair6634
    @dairyair6634 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Thank you for producing this very effective content of turbo charge. I just retired a 2005 Honda Accord with 310k miles and did NOT replace it with another Accord due to turbo. Bought a 2024 Camry instead.

    • @jamram9924
      @jamram9924 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      One of the best decisions you've made. Keep your engine oil full synthetic, our shop uses Pennzoil Ultra Platinum engine oil along with Wix XP engine oil filters.

    • @andywade172
      @andywade172 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just use 5w30 oil

    • @faisalyousuf820
      @faisalyousuf820 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andywade172 That's what the manufacturer recommends for my 370Z.

    • @gosman949
      @gosman949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      many Hondas have aspirated engines still. Even the six.

    • @d.o.5238
      @d.o.5238 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@gosman949old J35 V6s were really good, but modern ones have direct injection and VCM with some long-term reliability issues

  • @jorgitodes8703
    @jorgitodes8703 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for transparency, I never owned turbo engines cars as got many friends having issues with even new cars like Audi, Saab, Nissan, Toyotas ….

  • @JoseChung21
    @JoseChung21 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    AMD would love more 4Runner content - may God continue to bless you and your family

    • @subtegral
      @subtegral 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      3rd Gen 4Runner

    • @qpeocn
      @qpeocn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wait until the new one comes out next year. 4runner been the same the last 15+ years

    • @JoseChung21
      @JoseChung21 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@qpeocn New one is garbage

    • @qpeocn
      @qpeocn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @JoseChung21 yeah, the new 4runners and tacomas are good examples of if ain't broken, don't fix it. But Toyota have regulations they need to abide by.

  • @sixteenseven123
    @sixteenseven123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    One of my bosses at an old job had a Subaru Legacy 2.5GT (auto) as a daily driver with almost 250k miles on it and the turbo was so worn out it no longer made any boost, the air just blew right through it. I bring this up because he never really beat on the car, it was just driven like a normal car and maintained by an owner that had no idea what it meant to have a turbocharged engine, and that turbo was so reliable that when it failed it wasn’t a catastrophic failure that sent chunks of metal flying into the pistons, the clearances just got too broad and it stopped doing what it was supposed to. He continued to drive that car for several more years up to about 300k miles before finally trading it in without ever replacing the turbo. They can be reliable, it just depends how reliably you treat it

  • @edwinvg1
    @edwinvg1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best explanation on TH-cam when it comes to the subject matter of turbo engines/FI. Great calm teacher as well. Love it!

  • @borisramirez6083
    @borisramirez6083 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    115k miles on my 2018 Hyundai Elantra with a turbocharger. Just had a shop inspect the turbocharger, no oil/coolant leaks or consumption.
    Full synthetic oil with a 5k miles intervals. I take it easy on cold starts and I do let it cooldown for 30 secs - 1 minute before shutting it down.
    No engine bogging, I downshift accordingly.

  • @mingscustoms
    @mingscustoms 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    turbos spin well over 10-25k rpm. Look up any data sheet for a turbo and you can find its overspeed rpm which is usually over 100k rpm

  • @crrc4s
    @crrc4s 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Currently own a Turbo diesel, a naturally aspirated gass pickup and a twin turbo gass car. While the naturally aspirated truck has been very reliable, so have both turbo vehicles. The turbo diesel is incredibly efficient too, getting 22-24mpg highway in a 7k lbs truck. While I understand some people’s hesitation to get turbo powered cars they are very efficient and reliable as long as you keep up with maintenance. My gass pickup only gets 13 mpg.

  • @kingofthesofas
    @kingofthesofas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    We have a 23 sequioa we have about 35k miles on with the twin turbo. So far it has been great and on a day to day basis the turbo barely does anything, maybe 5 psi for 30 seconds getting up to highway speeds. Combining the hybrid with the turbo takes A LOT of stress of the turbo and engine since it can accelerate you instead of needing the turbo. We are still doing 4000 mile oil changes on it, but if you are getting one of the new turbos I would suggest one of the Toyota hybrids because i think they will last A LOT longer than non hybrids. And for those that think hybrids from Toyota are not reliable there are priuses going 500k+ miles regularly.

    • @JollyGiant19
      @JollyGiant19 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I know a guy who bought a very poorly taken care of second generation Prius to drive until it died.
      He ran it for another ten years after he bought it!

    • @BeefNEggs057
      @BeefNEggs057 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nope no battery cars for me. Disposable cars with no more than 10 years before the battery goes.

    • @BeefNEggs057
      @BeefNEggs057 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JollyGiant19 Bet he regretted buying a Prius. Sweat box

    • @JollyGiant19
      @JollyGiant19 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@BeefNEggs057Not at all, it became his “work truck” after he bought a replacement daily driver.

    • @kingofthesofas
      @kingofthesofas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BeefNEggs057 Toyota makes hybrids that will outlast the heat death of the universe. You hate should be reserved for BEV from shit companies like tesla.

  • @1fastwgn
    @1fastwgn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I have an '05 Subaru Outback XT (turbo), 190K. Running smooth and strong. Oil changes at 3,000 miles, no ifs, ands, or buts.

    • @thomaskim5008
      @thomaskim5008 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I guess you are being scammed. 5k miles with full synthetic is recommendations from many mechanics. Ask Scotty

    • @AaronAnnan-y7z
      @AaronAnnan-y7z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you use synthetic or conventional oil? I've heard (hearsay) that it's a waste for changing full synthetic oil less than every 10,000 mi.
      Thanks in advance

    • @1fastwgn
      @1fastwgn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Full synthetic. Not being scammed. Even Subaru says to change it every 3,750 miles. I stopped watching Scotty Kilmer years ago.

    • @thomaskim5008
      @thomaskim5008 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@1fastwgn Are you sure full synthetic every 3750 miles? How did they arrive at 3750? Any formula? Where is study that show that 3750 is the magic number?

    • @1fastwgn
      @1fastwgn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomaskim5008 Do a Google search for Subaru TSB #02-103-07. It has to do with the mesh screen in the turbo banjo bolt.

  • @williampatrickfagan7590
    @williampatrickfagan7590 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +83

    The trick to turbocharger reliability is give the turbo a chance to slow down before switching off the engine.
    NOT doing so, causes the bearings in the turbo to run dry.
    That causes bearing failure.
    I drive slower before parking.
    Then reverse into my drive way. Then disconnect my phone from the charger. Then unbuckle my seat belt.
    Then open the door.
    Then get out of my car.
    ONLY then do i switch off my engine.
    That few minutes allows the turbocharger to slow right down or stop.
    Think of the Turbocharger being a race horse.
    After the race you do not just stable it.
    You let it cool down gradually.
    When the horse is no longer hyper, it is relaxed and pampered then stabled.

    • @LapinDebogues
      @LapinDebogues 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      How does that work with cars that turn off at red lights - the so called stop-start system?

    • @a_void
      @a_void 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@LapinDebogues I turn off the start/stop every time I start the car. It just unnecessarily degrades the starter motor and battery

    • @williampatrickfagan7590
      @williampatrickfagan7590 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@LapinDebogues
      If you are in stop start situations the Turbo is not engaged.
      (Engine revs are to low)

    • @SavScorp22
      @SavScorp22 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yeah I take my time shutting off mine as well. This is why some people have turbo timers on their cars. I used to have one on my built srt4

    • @williampatrickfagan7590
      @williampatrickfagan7590 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Think

  • @rockymountainjazzfan1822
    @rockymountainjazzfan1822 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Great explanation. The main reason for turbocharged small displacement engines is to generate "good" fuel economy numbers on the unrealistic EPA fuel economy and emissions test cycle. When you decrease the decrease the displacement and number of cylinders of an engine, it will consume less fuel at idle and low-RPM/low load conditions. This can "bump" the fuel economy up on the EPA "city" part of the test cycle. But, when the vehicle is running at higher speeds and at heavier load, the small displacement of the engine won't create enough power without turbocharging. But, turbocharging allows the engine to burn more fuel--more power but higher fuel consumption, often as much fuel consumption as a larger displacement engine with more cylinders without turbocharging. Turbocharging puts huge physical stresses on an engine which WILL wear and destroy the engine much faster IF the engine is not properly engineered to withstand the additional stresses. Many turbocharged gasoline engines are NOT properly designed to last. Turbocharged diesel engines will generally last much longer than turbocharged gasoline engines because the diesel is already designed to withstand the higher pressures caused by the diesel's higher compression ratio. Were the EPA regs actually designed to be realistic in mirroring real vehicle use (they are not), turbocharging would be seldom used in gasoline-fueled engines.

    • @new2000car
      @new2000car 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes rockymountain. If you’re correct (which you are) the turbocharging for most cars is a bit of a scam. Any normal to heavy on the gas driver uses slightly more gas with a turbo. Only librarians save gas with a turbo, as compared to a bigger engine without turbo.

    • @drcovell
      @drcovell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent! 👍👍

    • @N4CR
      @N4CR 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's also less efficient under partial load than an NA engine, due to exhaust impediment. Turbo is not making any useful boost. Secondly enrichening for safety margins causes higher fuel consumption for given amount of power than NA when operating in an efficient range for each engine.

    • @sana-cm7oc
      @sana-cm7oc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is why so many Toyota trucks are rotting on the dealer lots. Fine by me.

  • @BobsTank
    @BobsTank 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Thanks to the excellent videos from the Car Care Nut, I was able to avoid buying a turbocharged vehicle & ended up buying a fantastic 4Runner and a V8 Lexus convertible. I hope these will be my 'forever cars'.
    THANK YOU, CAR CARE NUT!

    • @nkosinathindala4745
      @nkosinathindala4745 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are living my dream. Big ups 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

    • @gosman949
      @gosman949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      OK for you but not for the rest of us. You are polluting us! HELP!

    • @BobsTank
      @BobsTank 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@gosman949 I have no children. Therefore, my carbon credits are through-the-roof. 😉

  • @FTKDeLaVega
    @FTKDeLaVega 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a twin turbo engine vehicle. I really appreciate your valuable insight on turbo engines. So far I have been changing oil every 5k and rarely tow heavy loads. Thank you!

    • @Jay-me7gw
      @Jay-me7gw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not towing heavy loads is not neccesarily a good thing. These modern engines like to run hot to clean out the oil. That doesnt mean to abuse it, but it means that gently daily driving it and rarely getting it warm is not good.

  • @LA_Commander
    @LA_Commander 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Ahmed, GREAT VIDEO! As usual. I always learn so much from you even though I'm not a Toyota owner the things you talk about are often common across multiple makes. Keep up the good work and may the Lord bless you as well!

  • @nestorperez5905
    @nestorperez5905 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Just got a new Ram 1500 with the new engine in line 6 twin turbo and when I got to the dealer the other day to change the oil at the first 500 miles they called me crazy. I gave them the advice of follow The Car Care Nut.... and this is not the first time that happened to me, it also happen with the first oil change of my wife Highlander.... Thank you for making this videos!

  • @mcgilm69
    @mcgilm69 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For people that have no technical knowledge of cars, this was a very good video. Although I haven't been a mechanic for 2.5 decades, I still do some of my own maintenance. As soon as I saw the title of the video, I said it's all about oil changes. I have an F-150 with the EcoBoost engine. I also have an RV I tow in the summer. The two things I do to maintain the engine.
    1. I religiously change the oil at 5K miles with a quality full synthetic oil and filter. Don't go by the manufacturers recommendations. They are designed to get you to buy another car.
    2. When I'm towing my RV, when I pull over to gas up or take a break, I always let the engine run for a couple of minutes after coming to a stop. It allows coolant and oil to circulate and cool down to prevent heat soak.

  • @stratos6061
    @stratos6061 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Call me crazy, but I actually kind of like having some turbo lag. My first turbo car was a 1991 MR2, and I loved that sudden kick in the pants when the turbo kicked in and spooled up and you had that sudden rush of acceleration with the engine screaming right behind you. Had me grinning all the time.

    • @mikeydude750
      @mikeydude750 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For sure, I love the laggy feeling it's so fun. Can get you in real trouble if you don't know to expect it though lol

    • @MikeKayK
      @MikeKayK 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're referring to a sports car where the turbo is used to enhance performance and add to the driving experience. The turbo lag gives it character. The pinnacle of this was the Ferrari F40. This video, however, mostly focused on turbos that are used for efficiency in economy cars that are not meant to be exciting to drive.

    • @mikeydude750
      @mikeydude750 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MikeKayK Yup. And it's true...turbos in an econobox that people buy just because it's efficient is going to be a bad idea because those people are going to be the least likely to properly care for the maintenance.

    • @stratos6061
      @stratos6061 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikeydude750 Funny you should mention that. The first time I downshifted and floored it to pass someone on the highway, I darn near rear-ended them. Damn that car was fun.

    • @alaskabornheathen8902
      @alaskabornheathen8902 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Get a hybrid and put it in eco mode. You won’t hear a turbo, but it’ll do the exact same thing. Accelerate very slow until a certain point.

  • @pekopan00
    @pekopan00 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Another tip: Turbo engines in cold climates or winter, you MUST warm up the car. The engine oil should be warm so it can flow into the turbo when it spools. If you don't warm up, you're forcing thick oil (high viscous) into the turbo that will cause overheating (wear and tear of the moving parts) and fuel efficiency loss.

    • @Japplesnap
      @Japplesnap 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Today's turbo engines use very low viscosity oil. They get good oil pressure upon start-up even in subfreezing temps.

    • @truckercowboyed2638
      @truckercowboyed2638 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Japplesnapit's still wise to warm up the parts they function better warm than frozen

    • @Japplesnap
      @Japplesnap 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@truckercowboyed2638 Always. But if someone doesn't, it will still be okay.

    • @MikeKayK
      @MikeKayK 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Japplesnap He wasn't referring to the pressure, he was referring to the fact that warmer oil has lower viscosity than that same oil when it's cold, so it not only flows more easily but creates a more effective lubricating film between moving parts. It might be "ok" but it's not optimal until the oil is warm.

    • @Japplesnap
      @Japplesnap 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MikeKayK Oil pressure is the only thing that matters. If the oil pressure is good, the temperature (and viscosity) is irrelevant. Cold oil lubricates just as well as warm oil at a given pressure.

  • @peteyv
    @peteyv 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Actually, the best explanation of turbo function I’ve ever listened to. I wish you could be my mechanic.

  • @FrancisZerbib
    @FrancisZerbib 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great Turbo flash course. Excellent, comprehensive and clear. Thank you

  • @andreichichak5242
    @andreichichak5242 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Also, back in "the good old days" nobody would buy a used car that had anywhere close to 100,000 miles on it. Those cars were worn out junkers that, maybe, were good enough for student transportation.
    In the good old days it was common to have cars broken down on the side of the road.
    In the good old days you could smell a Ford's burning oil before you could see it. You could smell a Chevrolet's unburnt fuel before you could see it.
    They don't make 'em like they used to, thank Zarquon! Cars were junk and then Toyota embarassed the industry out if its complacency.

  • @richarda996
    @richarda996 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Many,many years ago as a young teenager I had gotten a 1962 Corvair spider. I was schooled very well on changing oil every 3000 miles and a five minute start up and shut down procedures. If one came off the highway and the turbo was red hot, it took fifteen minutes idling to cool down so as not to cook the oil. I never had any problems with the engine.

  • @mattcomchoc2957
    @mattcomchoc2957 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I've owned 4 turbo vehicles: 2003 golf TDI, 2012 TDI Jetta, 2016 Fiesta ST, 2019 Jetta. I have put 200k miles on turbo vehicles, and the ones i bought used have had 450k miles combined on them before i got them. Never a turbo problem. Oil changes at factory recommended intervals with oil that meets the spec.

  • @sentiencepsn2714
    @sentiencepsn2714 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    In both Europe and Asia, it’s common to see cars taxed by displacement. Turbo chargers allow manufacturers to build tax friendlier cars, higher compression, higher horsepower, for smaller displacements.

    • @PURENT
      @PURENT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In France, they just tax straight by grams of CO2 emitted per km. And well that results in a GR86 ~200 hp being taxed the full 60,000 euro penalty. While Cayenne Turbo Hybrid ~700 hp is taxed 0 euros just because the electric motor it comes with.

    • @dmitripetrov5536
      @dmitripetrov5536 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is rational than simply charging tax with displacement. ​@PURENT

    • @PURENT
      @PURENT 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dmitripetrov5536 It doesn't really make sense, Cayenne Turbo Hybrid is a $160,000 car. GR86 is a $30,000 car.

    • @tommoriarty2509
      @tommoriarty2509 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Used to work that way in Ireland but changed to taxing by CO2 emissions about 10 years ago

    • @jdmguy44
      @jdmguy44 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Here in the UK tax was/is related to CO2 emissions rather than engine size.

  • @badhombre8383
    @badhombre8383 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I agree with that being said. Oil changes these days are outrageously priced.

  • @roswellrider9803
    @roswellrider9803 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    If you know how a Turbo works skip to @21:34

  • @MR3DDev
    @MR3DDev 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Finally turbo well explained. Now I understand why no current turbocharged car sounds as exciting as they used to.

    • @WillyK51
      @WillyK51 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, turbocharge a V8, Good sound plus more power. Most V-8 builders use a Blower

    • @MR3DDev
      @MR3DDev 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WillyK51 not from factory unfortunately

    • @Japplesnap
      @Japplesnap 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Still very exciting. Look at any BMW M car. Turbocharged for power, regardless of what you were told in this video.

    • @nathanielrenteria9669
      @nathanielrenteria9669 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MR3DDevm5 m8 some Audis have ttv8s

    • @imnotusingmyrealname4566
      @imnotusingmyrealname4566 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Japplesnap Nah it's for both. BMW engines are incredibly efficient.

  • @Digital_Photog1995
    @Digital_Photog1995 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THANKYOU for explaining how it works and how to maintain the “New” Turbocharged engines. Many don’t have any idea the how to treat their Turbo engines. Now they should !

  • @drbcrb
    @drbcrb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I currently manage 4 vehicles. No turbo anywhere. Makes my life easier. Purchased ES350 as one of the last natural V6 cars.

    • @thomasmorris302
      @thomasmorris302 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Every Semi you see hauling tons have Turbos, they last a million miles, because they're maintained like the care nut, notes at the end of this presentation

  • @MJ-5k
    @MJ-5k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I dont know about the toyota gas turbos but Acura RDX 2007-2012 model has a super reliable engine for a turbo
    You can still find them in good condition with 500k miles used and running, this is a metric I use to see what cars have good longevity and durability

    • @7894-q4g
      @7894-q4g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      too bad they are so thirsty though

  • @JamieMSmith
    @JamieMSmith 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you, I’m about to buy my first car with a 2.4L turbo. I really didn’t know what this meant or how to take care of it of it. Thanks for educating us newbies on how to maintain it and get the most miles out of it. 😄

  • @chibbyylol
    @chibbyylol 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Smaller turbo engines have the benefit of effectively being a smaller engine in the lower RPMs when the turbo hasn't spooled up for efficiency, but has the benefit of a larger displacement engine when needed as the turbo spools (forcing more 'displacement' into the cylinders)

    • @singular9
      @singular9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It also has the advantage of weighing less and taking up less space.

    • @bobcook8576
      @bobcook8576 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It also works twice as hard wasting more fuel.

  • @beninformato9040
    @beninformato9040 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Dear Car Care Nut! I would suggest changing the name of your video to something that truly describes the amazing and informative content contained within. This is really a condensed, engineering 101 course on how turbos work, and their practical application in modern cars. A better, more attention grabbing title for those interested in this subject could be: "Understanding Turbochargers: A Deep Dive into Their Functionality and Reliability!" Just a thought. My second comment is Nooooo!!!! I love turbochargers! :-). They are so much fun when on boost! I especially like the old school ones that give you a kick in the seat when they scroll up. I had a 1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo and that car was so much fun and a blast to drive! - Keep up the great work! Respectfully!

  • @colemant6845
    @colemant6845 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent, Clear, Concise explanation of WHY everything small engine is "Turbo" now. Well Done!

  • @andyr7442
    @andyr7442 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Turbo 101 from Prof. AMD, love it, thanks

  • @blk124
    @blk124 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +184

    I have Two naturally aspirated cars and I will NOT trade them for a turbo! 😊

    • @dwaynemcallister7231
      @dwaynemcallister7231 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      I don't blame you. If you need high altitude power ok fine but for most car's forget it. I want simple reliable, keep your turbo I don't want it.

    • @gosman949
      @gosman949 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      my 2007 Camry six cylinder has 71k on it and I still smile when I get in it and take off!

    • @Kinann
      @Kinann 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@dwaynemcallister7231 Keep your apostrophe's, I don't need them.

    • @timradde4328
      @timradde4328 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Kinann Who cares?

    • @mastrtonberry2
      @mastrtonberry2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Same, brother

  • @ElPants21
    @ElPants21 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    More precisely the emissions problem with larger engines is unburnt fuel. What happens is some fuel gets into the tiny spaces (crevice volume) between the pistons/bores and even the head gasket area, and doesn't burn completely. Sone gets burnt by the catalytic converter but out the tailpipe goes the rest. By reducing the amount of cylinders in an engine, you reduce the crevice volume and thereby unburnt hydrocarbons. You add a turbo to get back the power you lost by shrinking the engine

  • @alejandramguerrero5885
    @alejandramguerrero5885 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    You were reading my mind ! I’ve been hoping you would talk about this !! ❤thank you !😊

  • @namegoeshere2903
    @namegoeshere2903 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    So glad none of my toyotas have turbos. I have well over 335,000 miles on my 2009 Corolla, runs like a top, my 2009 Venza has half that...but also runs like a top. No school like old school

    • @qpeocn
      @qpeocn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Those first gen Venzas were great and underappreciated imo. Hard to find a used one with good mileage

  • @trevcessna1723
    @trevcessna1723 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yep I can’t wrap my head around the new oil change intervals, I have a rule 5k or 6 months which ever comes first!! During Covid I did oil changes at 10 months 850klms as we weren’t driving much. The old saying, “you can pay me now or pay me later” is the reality! Excellent video, thank you for the explanation.

  • @johnnyngo749
    @johnnyngo749 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    One of the reasons why I have decided to go with a Rav4 2.5L NA instead of a Honda CR-V 1.5T.

    • @niuhuskieguy
      @niuhuskieguy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I do like that Honda has their turbos mounted at the front of the engine. Plenty of air flow to supplement the oil and coolant and easy of access.

  • @Dowlphin
    @Dowlphin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Reliability problems topic starts at 24:27.

    • @paquesepas6696
      @paquesepas6696 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you

    • @Dowlphin
      @Dowlphin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@paquesepas6696 My pleasure! ☺

  • @Huey4214
    @Huey4214 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great basic turbo information and Bravo on your stance on oil changes! Easy advice to follow but largely ignored by the masses.

  • @EverythingIsPhysics
    @EverythingIsPhysics 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The difference in used oil between my old Honda v6 after 5k miles and my Honda turbo 4cyl after 3k miles is shocking. The cashier at the auto parts store where I dump oil assumed I didn't keep up with oil changes because it smells horrible. I'm not planning to keep the turbo car past 60k miles... it doesn't even get very good gas mileage and the start/stop is annoying. Sad to say, this is car feels disposable. As always, thanks for the great video CCN!

    • @JohnnyBoy919
      @JohnnyBoy919 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What honda vehicle do you have with the turbo? Also do you have the option to turn the auto start/stop feature off?

    • @ironmonkey1512
      @ironmonkey1512 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't understand the point of it, was thinking of the RDX but it gets terrible gas mileage. Somehow toyota can make a non-turbo 4 cylinder that gets 35mpg... went with the RAV4. I don't care if it is a boomer car.

    • @EverythingIsPhysics
      @EverythingIsPhysics 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I get 23-24mpg in the RDX, mostly highway. First 1000 miles was 20-22 mpg. Stop/Start can be disabled with a button, but must be pressed every time the car is started. I haven't tested it explicitly for mpg, but it seems to make little difference in my case. I feel the safety risk of losing all power while stopped in an intersection waiting to turn is not worth it. I don't want to be distracted toggling it on and off.
      Rav4 seems like a good choice, maybe my brother will get one... I'd love it if they made it quieter. I drove the hybrid crv, and the drivetrain was not acceptable to me with 4 adults in the car... hard to judge the power delivery.

    • @JohnnyBoy919
      @JohnnyBoy919 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EverythingIsPhysics were both honda vehicles the rdx? One of them a v6 and the other turbo 4 cylinder?

    • @EverythingIsPhysics
      @EverythingIsPhysics 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JohnnyBoy919 turbo 4 is RDX, the v6 is a tlx prev model (this engine has a recall that I'm still waiting for...). I've learned not to take good drivetrains for granted!

  • @Riley_1955
    @Riley_1955 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I personally wouldn't buy anything with a turbo myself but if you do you had better make damn sure that thing is covered under your warranty.

    • @nombreapellido9038
      @nombreapellido9038 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree! If I need power from my Corolla, I downshift and punch it. Naturally aspirated and I love it!

  • @Mlachake
    @Mlachake 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Oh my, The Car Care Nut you just took me back to school where I learnt about engines. Very very educational, you are the man and I thank you. I have learnt a lot about turbos.

  • @cpersing
    @cpersing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Oil changes every 5k and now 3k and 190k miles on original turbo/engine and still runs great.

  • @rightlanehog3151
    @rightlanehog3151 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    AMD. Like everything else in the automotive world, there are going to be good turbochargers, average turbochargers and bad turbochargers. One thing all 1,170,000 of us can agree on is that turbos require a 'boost' in maintenance frequency. 😉

  • @ladorose8617
    @ladorose8617 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is the best overview of turbos that I have ever seen. Well done!

  • @GixxerRider1991
    @GixxerRider1991 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Turbos are for performance and industrial applications only. These types of engines are built to withstand the extra pressure and heat, as opposed to taking an otherwise normal low displacement engine and slapping a turbo on it. For the average consumer, the extra power and fuel economy become redundant once maintenance costs start adding up.

  • @keaganwall8178
    @keaganwall8178 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Everyone who says they’ll never buy anything with a turbo is giving “old man shakes fist at cloud”

  • @brianpaine1749
    @brianpaine1749 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, for me, that video was incredibly informative!! I’ve heard many of those terms throughout my life. However, the presenter explained so well how everything in the turbo works. I watched because I just bought my fist vehicle with a turbo. Now I will know better how to treat it. Thanks!!

  • @mudfan061
    @mudfan061 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How do we solve the problem? Try to get government out of this area….along with many others. Until then…his advice sounds good. I like listening to this guy

  • @k6-3spetznazhelmet
    @k6-3spetznazhelmet 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +122

    more moving parts in a cars engine bay = more things that can potentially go wrong
    it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out

    • @chibbyylol
      @chibbyylol 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      In today's age, the question is more so what has more moving parts / increased complexity
      (1) a turbo 4 cylinder engine or (2) a naturally aspirated V6 but with cylinder deactivation, mild hybrid system or start/stop

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@chibbyylolvery true, a single turbocharger really just has one moving part. Even a regular DOHC V-configuration engine has two additional cams, all the associated valves and valve springs, potentially an extra chain or belt along with tensioners, extra injectors, plugs, catalytic converter etc.

    • @Drg24800
      @Drg24800 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@chibbyylolNot a fan of turbos personally but you have a valid point. I would love to see some type of study with all the different technologies used to improve efficiency and how they affect reliability/longevity.

    • @adamsteele6148
      @adamsteele6148 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's not rocket appliances

    • @michaelxcx
      @michaelxcx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      yet hybrids are way more complicated then turbos, yet hybrids last significantly longer. sounds like you need to re-think your argument there bud.

  • @tyellard9301
    @tyellard9301 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Such a good nugget in there. I have a 2023 Tacoma and am big about maintenance and always have been. Owners manual recommends 10,000 mile oil changes, but I always do mine at 5000 regardless of the fact that it’s synthetic oil.

  • @KaitlynLyon-p5o
    @KaitlynLyon-p5o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +120

    tunedbyai AI fixes this. Turbo engines offer performance, reliability.

    • @sbarter
      @sbarter 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      More parts, more chance to break. That's the rule I live by

    • @endless_potatoes
      @endless_potatoes หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Simply put you are correct. The less parts usually the better and simpler