Can you guess the Contender 44' ST TOP Speed?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 58

  • @Seven_Craig
    @Seven_Craig 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    DAMN! I’m not a big Contender fan but this one is a straight up big Merc BEAST!

  • @TheGav0071
    @TheGav0071 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautiful boat. I love how each 500r outboard is only 720lbs. approx 40% lighter than the mercury 600 at over 1200lbs!

  • @tylerhaggerty8936
    @tylerhaggerty8936 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I’m at work, currently just designed and tooled a Kit for one of your boats with your logo on it 🤝

  • @houlester
    @houlester หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should do a series of best boats in a size range. A top 10 list or something.

  • @MagnoaHunter53
    @MagnoaHunter53 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    now this is a boat!!

  • @jonmessler7067
    @jonmessler7067 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It’s funny no one ever comments on how much fuel these outboards burn, most people would be surprised to hear this boat burns nearly 200 GPH at wide open, I’m sure your burning 100-120 an hour at cruise….

    • @Fljeep18
      @Fljeep18 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow so only 3 hours at WOT and you’re empty that sucks. 6 hours at cruising speed.

  • @nasosnasos8054
    @nasosnasos8054 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Price ?

  • @johnworkman2611
    @johnworkman2611 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    how do you afford a boat like that as a charter boat?

  • @Reload77725
    @Reload77725 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That boat needs a Seakeeper 6, not a 3

    • @CenterConsolesOnly
      @CenterConsolesOnly  หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 3 does a great job with it. Seakeeper came out with the 4 that would actually be perfect for this boat but we already hade the 3 Installed on it.

  • @zackriden79
    @zackriden79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    how much fucking money does a fishing charter make to afford 1.5m boat ?? i dont understand

    • @Smokeyr67
      @Smokeyr67 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, they aren't paying full price, so maybe not $1.5 m, but just to cover the fuel cost for a days charter wouldn't be cheap 😢

    • @TheVonMatrices
      @TheVonMatrices 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was wondering the same thing and came to the conclusion that there is no way it can pay itself back through charter fees and it was never intended to. You don't need a boat this extravagant to run a charter business.
      I'm sure this is one of those situations where the person only needed a normal charter boat but then pimps out the boat and milks the tax law by calling it all a "business expense." Like, no one is going to pay 50% more for a charter because it has 500hp outboards but you can be sure that the business will still claim tax deductions for the engine upgrade cost.

    • @christopherkeith5254
      @christopherkeith5254 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Charters can be expensive. You could probably run 4-5 charters a month and that pays for the boat and fuel. Also, keep in mind that you dont just go out and buy a 1.5 million dollar boat. You start small and build up. Maybe you start on a 150k boat.

    • @zackriden79
      @zackriden79 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christopherkeith5254 this boat is 400g do some math on how much charter fishing has to cost the most expensive charters are sport fishers and this boats equal coast as a sport fisher and this boat burns more fuel

    • @houlester
      @houlester หลายเดือนก่อน

      Repeat customers and customers willing to pay a lot more than the average person. I would pay way more to be on this boat vs a beat up 30 year old boat.

  • @MrWebrockk
    @MrWebrockk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    56 kts

  • @themayor3263
    @themayor3263 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    If I had this boat I wouldnt bother fishing. Id just run it up and down the Florida coast checking out bikinis

  • @lukesteadman6441
    @lukesteadman6441 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    72 MPH

  • @geraldbunn9683
    @geraldbunn9683 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    82 mph

  • @jdpg01
    @jdpg01 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fishing People Care About Mileage........these 3+engine boats dont make sense to me......they are awesome......but just dont make sense economically

  • @chris_bjj123
    @chris_bjj123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'd rather have the dependability of XTOs over the speed of R's.

    • @charlieodom9107
      @charlieodom9107 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is a weight thing, not a power thing. XTOs would be too heavy.

    • @chris_bjj123
      @chris_bjj123 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@charlieodom9107 too heavy for what? Quad 450 XTOs is an option on the 44.

    • @charlieodom9107
      @charlieodom9107 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chris_bjj123 thexboat performs like shit with those motors. They are too heavy.

    • @chris_bjj123
      @chris_bjj123 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@charlieodom9107 🤣

    • @charlieodom9107
      @charlieodom9107 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @chris_bjj123 what is so funny? Have you been on one of these boats to see how it performs with different engines?

  • @Gator-xi2jq
    @Gator-xi2jq 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Finally a contender w/o Yamaha engines

    • @seangreene64
      @seangreene64 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Finally a contender that won’t be reliable

    • @mosquitofleetfishing6599
      @mosquitofleetfishing6599 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@seangreene64 as someone who went through 3 Yamaha power heads in 4 months, I disagree. I don’t endorse the 500r to be anything other than cool and powerful, but beats a Yamaha.

    • @charlieodom9107
      @charlieodom9107 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@mosquitofleetfishing6599 the maintenance on the 400r, 450r, and 500r is absolutely retarded.
      The seapro motors are much more reliable and easier to maintain.
      Hell, even the XS motors are better.

    • @winstonzeb2842
      @winstonzeb2842 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yamaha makes it an absolute pain in the ass for boat builders to get their engines unless they are a super high volume conglomerate builder or the boat builder does some sort of exclusivity deal.

  • @buckethead9861
    @buckethead9861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    seems like experienced captains don’t like the joystick is it a machismo thing?

    • @bubbleobill267
      @bubbleobill267 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If you know how to run a boat they’re not really needed.

    • @blakemiller748
      @blakemiller748 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A joystick isn’t necessary, but worth its weight in gold for the additional features such as skyhook (Merc) or the Yamaha fishpoint which holds position. The fishpoint is truly a set and forget system

    • @GulfSoftwash
      @GulfSoftwash 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bubbleobill267idk why this is so hard for people to understand. It’s so simple.

    • @GulfSoftwash
      @GulfSoftwash 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@blakemiller748yeah and your lower units will
      be changed once a year if you’re holding over wrecks or reefs. Absolute wear and tear on them. Professional captains don’t need it. It’s for weekend warriors and people who don’t know how to run a boat.

    • @blakemiller748
      @blakemiller748 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GulfSoftwash you’ve never seen the Yamaha fish point. It keeps the stern into the current so the boat is just in reverse with minimal turns. Go actually fish on one