Well… They will buy electro limousines and tell you that they are very ecologic, which is simply not tru because it is never only about using the cars but also about production and destruction of them… This is just ideology of activists, because no scientist will agree with the plan to go from 10 % to 0 % of emissions if the biggest productors wont do anything. And border taxing them will only give us more money not save the planet…
It's a scam! They stop burning coal. And start burning wood. Wood burning pollution is much higher. Gas is the cleanest burning feul. In The Netherlands we heat our house's with gas. The eu bannes gas heating. And introduces electricity from woodburning to warm your house. EU made a law that wood burning is climate neutral and is cleaner than fossil feuls! The stupidity reaches madness...!!! The plans that they have rolled out. Result in peoples houses are not warm any more. A heat pump doesn't warm your house. Governments give electrical heatings system to them in the winter. But when a building starts using it the power goes down because of overload. Result No Warmth, No Electricity and its freezing -15 Celsius. The stupidity reaches madness!!!
Are all those wind blades recyclable??? Where do you bury them when Seabirds and storms break them? Are solar panels carcinogenic after 20 years? Recyclable??? sounds like a great money maker taxing the people for false solutions that clearly are not green!!!
The goal is simple. The European Union has understood three things. The enormous debt that the United States is contracting by extracting its own oil with very expensive techniques such as fracking, to consume only US oil, the instability of territories (Arabs, Russia, etc.) in the face of oil businesses and dependence on polluting energies in developing countries (like China or India). What the EU intends is to create a source of clean and cheap energy (in production, not investment) to save costs both in industry and in the use of machinery (vehicles, factories, and other things) and thus have zero energy dependence on other countries. In my (positive) opinion this can create an industrial revolution in the short term that can make Europe a huge world power. Of course, given the panorama, the first enemy we are going to have is the United States, since they do not want a plan of such magnitude, and Donald Trump knows it ...the future is not petrol, and almost all the world nations depends on it so in my point of view is very clever to be the first ones going towards in a new direction acording to the production of energies
So the moral of the story is..? Cover the whole planet with horizon perluting windmills and solar feelds? And everybody drives a electric car?? Simply not achievable! Wake the f*ck up! 😏
Not trying to be combative, just curious, because I thought fracking is an efficient method that has made US almost independent in energy. Biden's plan to ban fracking (eg Keystone pipeline cancellation) costs jobs and money, but also the environment, as it is more expensive and environmentally unfriendly to import energy. I'm not an expert though, so I'm only asking.
@@eggbirdtherooster There are also other sources of energy such as hydropower, and nuclear fission reactors. There's also a lot of research going into nuclear fusion which if figured out then we will never have problems with energy again (since it would be able to generate 4x the amount of energy as nuclear fission). There also isn't much of a need for cars if you have good public transit, pedestrian-friendly cities, and bike-friendly.
Great things never come like this. Planning economics never works, taxing never leads to prosperity and great ideas to make the world better place never works as well.
now tell me what tech does EU have to make that plan true? or the point is in TAXation for Russian Oil/Gas, China goods or cheap India medicine? I also didn't hear: affordable\cheap energy for homes. This is insane!
Honestly speaking, beyond the triumphalism, this is frightening. Changes nobody has tried yet will kill business and skills that have brought us this far.
But its not so there is no point in decreasing our emissions from 10 to 0 % in such a dead line and killing our economical growth. If the rest od the world proucing 90 % of emissions wont do anything we cant do anything as well, because doing anything will decrease our market competitiveness which is firstly unfair and secondly and mainly can be also destructive.
You wish to earn a slice of that 1 trillion Euros, good Sir, but we may get much more than you bargained for. Environmentalism seems poised to replace equity and social justice as the noble ideal for the next Soviet-like disaster.
Wonderfull, but I think we should accelerate this process even further and faster, because if global climate and natural habitats will go to drain, then even the Europe's green deal would not save us.
ECB prints it, buys negative-yielding government bonds, puts it on its balance sheet, gives the money to the countries, and voila, it is funded! Side effect is asset price inflation.
By counting the total CO2 emissions historically, we see that USA, EU and China are responsible for 25%,22% and 13% of global emissions accordingly. There is no reason to blame developing countries for their emissions, as they are right now doing, what we have already done. It is a shared resposibility among developed countries to invest in a greener future. We have the resources, highly educated workforces and the technology to develop low-cost, low-carbon solutions and spread them around the world. In this way poor countries won't become as fossil fuel dependent as we were and still are right now. As low-carbon technology becomes cheaper and more available, developing countries will get their fair share of development in a green way, not in the way we got it.. If the developed countries decide to seriously tackle climate change, the rest of the world will follow because they will have no other better choise..
Sure they have a better choice: keep the system running. Why should they stopt? If Europe stops consuming oil and gas, guess who will have it for longer? Yup, the ones that did not transition. Developing countries will prosper while the EU will regress for a high price: Huge inflation due to substition for the industries, following by the destruction of the middle class and to round things up, mass immigration will slowly but surely destroy indigenous population and with that, all their values and accomplishments. In a way this is a genius plan, make it everyone equal, the big socialist experiment.
@M.V.P. when u say 3rd world countries,you refer to africa for example?because idk,,there are thousands of industries in EU amd America that pollute the enviroment
![EU Green Deal Masterclass [EN] - Introduction (1/11)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wkpLv8wbJZk/mqdefault.jpg)
![EU Green Deal Masterclass [EN] - Introduction (1/11)](/img/tr.png)
![คุณอาเรียโต๊ะข้างๆ พูดรัสเซียหวานใส่ซะหัวใจจะวาย ตอนที่ 2 [ซับไทย] 【Ani-One Thailand】](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kbbfYakMY8k/mqdefault.jpg)
So I guess all those bureaucrats will be giving up their limousines, right?
Well… They will buy electro limousines and tell you that they are very ecologic, which is simply not tru because it is never only about using the cars but also about production and destruction of them… This is just ideology of activists, because no scientist will agree with the plan to go from 10 % to 0 % of emissions if the biggest productors wont do anything. And border taxing them will only give us more money not save the planet…
Why does it sound like he’s making fun of the plan!!? 😂
I was waiting for the punch line.
@@nonamecommonsense9089 what the heck??
NOname Common Sense it seems you did never have geography in your school
Encouraging enthusiasm :o)
It's a scam!
They stop burning coal.
And start burning wood.
Wood burning pollution is much higher.
Gas is the cleanest burning feul.
In The Netherlands we heat our house's with gas.
The eu bannes gas heating.
And introduces electricity from woodburning to warm your house.
EU made a law that wood burning is climate neutral and is cleaner than fossil feuls!
The stupidity reaches madness...!!!
The plans that they have rolled out. Result in peoples houses are not warm any more. A heat pump doesn't warm your house.
Governments give electrical heatings system to them in the winter. But when a building starts using it the power goes down because of overload.
Result
No Warmth, No Electricity and its freezing -15 Celsius.
The stupidity reaches madness!!!
Are all those wind blades recyclable??? Where do you bury them when Seabirds and storms break them? Are solar panels carcinogenic after 20 years? Recyclable??? sounds like a great money maker taxing the people for false solutions that clearly are not green!!!
The goal is simple. The European Union has understood three things. The enormous debt that the United States is contracting by extracting its own oil with very expensive techniques such as fracking, to consume only US oil, the instability of territories (Arabs, Russia, etc.) in the face of oil businesses and dependence on polluting energies in developing countries (like China or India). What the EU intends is to create a source of clean and cheap energy (in production, not investment) to save costs both in industry and in the use of machinery (vehicles, factories, and other things) and thus have zero energy dependence on other countries. In my (positive) opinion this can create an industrial revolution in the short term that can make Europe a huge world power. Of course, given the panorama, the first enemy we are going to have is the United States, since they do not want a plan of such magnitude, and Donald Trump knows it ...the future is not petrol, and almost all the world nations depends on it so in my point of view is very clever to be the first ones going towards in a new direction acording to the production of energies
Fuck UE end Mekel-Macron
So the moral of the story is..? Cover the whole planet with horizon perluting windmills and solar feelds? And everybody drives a electric car?? Simply not achievable! Wake the f*ck up! 😏
Not trying to be combative, just curious, because I thought fracking is an efficient method that has made US almost independent in energy. Biden's plan to ban fracking (eg Keystone pipeline cancellation) costs jobs and money, but also the environment, as it is more expensive and environmentally unfriendly to import energy. I'm not an expert though, so I'm only asking.
Your brainwashing is complete. Every authority approves. Congratulations.
@@eggbirdtherooster There are also other sources of energy such as hydropower, and nuclear fission reactors. There's also a lot of research going into nuclear fusion which if figured out then we will never have problems with energy again (since it would be able to generate 4x the amount of energy as nuclear fission). There also isn't much of a need for cars if you have good public transit, pedestrian-friendly cities, and bike-friendly.
When was this posted? The New Green Deal doesn't include a lot of these things at present, to my knowledge.
Still ongoing. Some goals upgraded/hastened due to Putin.
Great things never come from comfort zones!
Great things never come like this. Planning economics never works, taxing never leads to prosperity and great ideas to make the world better place never works as well.
Bye bye europe
Big lie.
now tell me what tech does EU have to make that plan true? or the point is in TAXation for Russian Oil/Gas, China goods or cheap India medicine? I also didn't hear: affordable\cheap energy for homes. This is insane!
we're gonna own nothing, because there will be only mud huts, and we will be happy
Honestly speaking, beyond the triumphalism, this is frightening. Changes nobody has tried yet will kill business and skills that have brought us this far.
In this EU Green Deal, I sense Orwell's '1984'...
How are they going to sanction the volcano emitting 90% of the CO2?
They'll find a way.
Tax it as everything so far…
This should not only be the ambition of the Eu, but of the entire world !
Exactly !!!!!!!
No wtf nobody asked for this
But its not so there is no point in decreasing our emissions from 10 to 0 % in such a dead line and killing our economical growth. If the rest od the world proucing 90 % of emissions wont do anything we cant do anything as well, because doing anything will decrease our market competitiveness which is firstly unfair and secondly and mainly can be also destructive.
You wish to earn a slice of that 1 trillion Euros, good Sir, but we may get much more than you bargained for. Environmentalism seems poised to replace equity and social justice as the noble ideal for the next Soviet-like disaster.
well explained
Really great video! Thanks :)
Wonderfull, but I think we should accelerate this process even further and faster, because if global climate and natural habitats will go to drain, then even the Europe's green deal would not save us.
Dream on ......!😔
💚💚💚
Hello new poverty for all! Where is all that money coming from?
ECB prints it, buys negative-yielding government bonds, puts it on its balance sheet, gives the money to the countries, and voila, it is funded! Side effect is asset price inflation.
Worldwide communism and eating bugs in place of beef😳
At least there's somebody doing something I'm a little happier that the world I grow up in maybe will be better
You still believe that shit? Wake up!
Damn what happened to you
You're just brainwashed by EU propaganda. Calm down and don't listen to their shit.
#GreenSteal tho
England not in Europe now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
อย่าเลยตบหัวแล้วอย่ามาลูบหลังคนที่กระทำกับเราเราไม่ลืมโอกาสเราก็ให้อดทนเอาอดทนที่สุดแล้วนี่เราหมดความอดทนแล้วมันไม่เหลือแล้วส่วนที่ดีๆไม่เหลือแล้วหมดสิทธิ์จะเลิกกับพี่เองแก้เองแต่สิ่งที่เลวร้ายที่จะมีให้
By counting the total CO2 emissions historically, we see that USA, EU and China are responsible for 25%,22% and 13% of global emissions accordingly. There is no reason to blame developing countries for their emissions, as they are right now doing, what we have already done. It is a shared resposibility among developed countries to invest in a greener future. We have the resources, highly educated workforces and the technology to develop low-cost, low-carbon solutions and spread them around the world. In this way poor countries won't become as fossil fuel dependent as we were and still are right now. As low-carbon technology becomes cheaper and more available, developing countries will get their fair share of development in a green way, not in the way we got it.. If the developed countries decide to seriously tackle climate change, the rest of the world will follow because they will have no other better choise..
Sure they have a better choice: keep the system running. Why should they stopt? If Europe stops consuming oil and gas, guess who will have it for longer? Yup, the ones that did not transition. Developing countries will prosper while the EU will regress for a high price: Huge inflation due to substition for the industries, following by the destruction of the middle class and to round things up, mass immigration will slowly but surely destroy indigenous population and with that, all their values and accomplishments. In a way this is a genius plan, make it everyone equal, the big socialist experiment.
Start paying taxes
in Italy it is not possible, we have Salvini and Meloni, unfortunately
Good for you!
They must be crazy or evil, maybe both.
Final Solution to the Climate Question
Well, history has already shown how final solutions usually will end up. Got stay with us.
this is crazy, EU is doomed economically
2020
This is how the trenches were filled with in WW1...over by Christmas
wow it is almost like you like the plan.... pretty weird...
@FakeDollars no I'm dutch
Is there something to not be "liked"?
@@MyaSousa it is crazy expensive and it wont help the climate
@M.V.P. when u say 3rd world countries,you refer to africa for example?because idk,,there are thousands of
industries in EU amd America that pollute the enviroment
@@sophiamr4008 He means China which isn't third world It's the second biggest Economy in the world.
เขากลับเห็นเป็นของเล่นช่างดูถูกน้ำใจความหวังดีเราเหลือเกินพวกท่านจะมอบให้เราแล้วเราและนายประจักษ์แก่สายตาแก่พวกท่านแล้วยังชัดเจนที่นี่ที่เราจะเราจะมอบให้เขาบ้าง
พระผู้เป็นเจ้าผู้เมตตาเทวดาอินทราเทพท้าวสุวรรณถ้าจตุรเทพดูเขาเสียก่อนอันตัวเรายากลำบากกระทำด้วยความหวังดีมีเมตตากรุณา