He reminds me of my mom's current mistake, I mean husband. You can't trust ANYTHING that comes out of his mouth. He'll say he owned a body shop and in the next breath he says he worked for the guy who owned the body shop. Same thing with this con artist, I'm going to tell you one thing to get you on the hook for something more and then forge your signature to try to get what I want. He's slimy.
The show can only order the statutory maximum ...... meaning the maximum one can recover in small claims in the state where the plaintiff lives. Yeah it would be nice to get back all of it. Since she gave the guy 6K, with the statutory limit being 5K, it would have been more fair to give her back 5K ..... but the woman did have use of the truck for those 7 months so yeah, you don't get to rent a truck for nothing ..... guess maybe the judge tossed in a bit more for loss as a lesson for the woman to learn how to take better care of her business .... that excuse that her husband had taken care of everything when the were marriage.... that is a stupid thing for a woman to do .... ya need to know how to take care of yourself.
@@somebodywatchin The show can only award up to the statutory max allowed by the state of the plaintiff. So, if the actually amount owed is 6K, but the statutory max is 5k, that would be the most that could be awarded.
The defendant, who's in the business of selling motor vehicles, somehow doesn't have the paperwork? Hmmm. Either very sloppy record-keeping or shady, and my inclination is toward the latter. I'm curious to see what he later says about the title. Edit: Sure enough, a highly suspicious signature on the lien papers. Defendant's credibility is in the toilet. And the funniest part to me is that he was fussing with his "documentation" before Douglas moved him over to be sworn in. What documentation did he have?
Each state would have firm document retention periods articulated for these documents, and dealers, for sure, must be aware of that. For bill of sale for vehicles, in my state, I think it’s 7 years.
I used to flip cars when one could buy a junker for $100, clean it (my old lady did that), tune it up and sell it the next day for $500. I had people coming back because something broke months later.
I can understand what the plaintiff is talking about when she says she doesn’t know anything because her husband used to handle everything. If/when my husband passes before me it’s going to be very difficult for me to take over doing everything. He does the bills, repairs, and maintains everything.
7 month use of the truck is hardly worth $2000, or in this case a whopping 33% of what she paid for it. I'd say the plaintiff got the worse end of the deal.
@@jamslam5641 yea except she wasn’t renting the car. Everyone knows renting a car costs more than the ownership. So to treat the 7 months like a rental is, essentially, causing her to lose money in this transaction. The man essentially got to rent the car out and make a profit and then repossessing the car. Not to mention the judge blatantly ignored the felony of signature forgery.
This lady is trippin me out. She doesn't know how to do anything without a man, can't even talk. She looks at her brother to speak for her. Damn. 🤦🏽♀️😂
She did fine, having someone else there can help. And she said her previous husband did all of the business end of the marriage, which is a nice perk---however, the other spouse should have some business knowledge.
WTF!!! she has to pay the crook 2K for the time she had the car even thro the decision was that the dealer had no evidence that they had agreed on a different price of $7300: What dealer would hand over the car and not provide a written contract to the amount owning? and it's obvious the dealer forged the signature. Such a bad decision by the Judge.
The only reason he didn't bring the paperwork was because it would have ruined his case, you don't have to be a genius to work that out. Given that, he sold it for $6k and then committed forgery, and then illegally repossessed it after trying to scam another $1400. Then the judge makes her pay $2000 for the privilege of driving it?! Another poor decision there.
She used it for 7 months but since he jacked her around and tried to extort more money from her AND had someone forge her name she shouldn’t have had to pay anything.
I've bought cars but NEVER left without a bill of sale and title. I understand that the DMV would keep the title if the vehicle wasn't paid for but not having a bill of sale is just stupid. A dealer without paperwork is just wrong.
What an absolute con man he is. He conveniently has no bill of sale or title. Then there is the document with the forged signature that they brought to court while under oath. His excuse for not having the paperwork is that it was 3 years ago. So what! He should bring that to court. She was naive unfortunately. Could they not bring a charge against him for the forged signature? I think JM should have awarded her 5000, which is the maximum she can award. 2000 for 7 months use is too much. The saddest part of this is that the defendant does not make the payout. The show does. So he actually gets to keep the 6000. He is a scammer and a crook. One good thing is that they mention the name of his company so if you are in Florida looking for a vehicle just refer to this video to see where NOT to go.
Amen!!! Totally agree. Totally agree! Not sure why she didn't return that chics money. The friggin guy earned double profit, her money and more money when he sold it again! Not to mention he committed a felony with the forgery! He filed forged documents to the courts to illegally steal the truck. Then committed more forgery and fraud by continuing the felony in her court under oath! If it was me I'd file a formal complaint with attorney general, and go after his dealer lisc, and file police report for forgery and theft of vehicle. She has the proof and now vid proof too with this court case. It wouldn't be Abt the money at this point, I'd be after his livelihood. His pockets
Wow busted for forgery! He needs to definitely lose his dealer lisc. And he filed court documents, based on this forgery. Wow. Crime. Then just handed the judge this forged document under oath. Report and file a case against this crook
Who buys a car with no title? When you finance a car you STILL get a title, but the lienholder is on title too. I can't believe she let him get away with it, with a forgery to boot. She really missed the boat on this one. So he got to sell the car twice and she put the bite on the plaintiff for 2k. That sounds like good motivation for the scammer to keep on scamming.
@@auaiao9 It was registered to the company that loaned the money to you and your name isn't on the title? That means you had no liability, that's awesome. No insurance premiums. What state do you live in? I want to buy a car there.
@@michaeldose2041 My cars were never registered to the companies that loaned me money. I said they hold on to the titles until the last payment is made.
I’m glad the judge wasn’t so hard on her when she said her ex husband took care of everything. It’s sad some women live like that but they do. She honestly didn’t know
@@ihateutube1143 Thats great for you and your wife, but if (heaven forbid) something happens to you, will your wife know how to do those things herself? That’s why this situation was sad, the lady honestly didn’t know the procedure and thus got swindled. As for you, as long as your wife knows how to do those things on her own (or, knows how to find out how to do those things on her own) then it’s all good if she is choosing to let you handle it instead. 👍
I’m using this paper work as my waters paper doily!! 😳 Ha!!! Next was ~YOU’RE NOT PICKING UP WHAT IM PUTTING DOWN! 😂😂 Judge M is too funny, pretty much a bad ass after she started yelling!
He conveniently lost the paper work then committed a felony then illegally repossessed the truck? If he did this to her, this is probably his normal practice. He needs to go to jail!
The dealer was playing a scam game. He sold her a car, then just added the additional tax and other taxes, costs to the agreed $6000 total. This is a common tactic, so buyer beware. He seriously needs to loose his license until he fixes his act up! Not to mention the forged signature that the dealer probably convinced his clerk to forge before she quit.
when I bought a used car from a salesman like this we paid the first months payment to him and then he called regarding the second months payment for us to come down and pay it, yet he said we never paid the first month! he said I am positive because I have a carbon copy notebook and I never tear out the original, only the copy. and your's Is not here! we were flabbergasted as we were holding the receipt in our hands. we had to drive all the way down there to show them. I can only imagine how many people they get over like that.
Why these people had no paperwork for proof is beyond me - the judge has to have paperwork for evidence so the judge can be fair - paperwork is a requirement and has to be legal
They should have cops to arrest crooks who have the audacity to submit forged documents and thinking they would get away with it. I mean where's the retribution, dude lied about everything, forged documents and still gets to keep 2000 dollars.
They should have institutions to hold people like her ,with no common sense, in them until a chaperone is found.. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 It's true that people like him should be punished but come on!!
I have a sneaky feeling that document was signed by him. The judge should've have had him sign her name in his handwriting. To see if it matched the forged signature. Because I'm thinking it was him. Because then if that was proven he did. Couldn't she sue him again for forgery? Also, this is why I never go to anyone for cars except for one guy who is my Dad's best friend. You can't trust car dealers. At least with my Dad's friend he is straight up honest. Even told me a car I was interested in wasn't worth it. And that the car had lots of issues. And there was a reason it was still on the lot 7 months later.
Yes but if she asked him to sign her name in his signature he would not be stupid enough to sign it the same way as on the lien document. He would just make something up that doesn't match.
@@stephenbanks5952 There are handwriting experts that can make you do that; but, they're only called in for highest profile cases, the gov't cases involving hundreds of millions of dollars; or, the forgery of some high top official.
@@phlushphish793 I am not understanding what you mean. My only point is that if he.had signed that document and the judge asked him to make a signature for her to compare he would not be stupid enough to sign the same way as on the document. He would sign in a different style. This was in response to the original comment. I see what you mean about handwriting experts being used in larger cases. This would not warrant that.
I made the same mistake. I handed over a check for a car without asking for the title. I believe the dealer deliberately held the title to make sure the check cleared. After it cleared he contacted me and told me he was gonna mail me the title.
I once sold a car to a junk yard. They would come tow it for me! I asked the guy, "Don't I have to sign some paperwork?" "We'll take care of all the paperwork." Well, they didn't. I started getting bills for skipped tolls in San Francisco. I lived in L.A. They took those skipped tolls off my tax return!
@@phlushphish793 Yeah, you needed to do a title transfer. I only know this from seeing the signs in my local DMV when I go pay my property taxes. Hopefully, you've taken care of that issue.
I been a auto mechanic involved with dealerships, private owners, buy here/pay here, corporate and of course myself. I trust a politician telling the truth before a used car sales person.
He’s a fraud and a lazy one at that. Minimal effort. That lady needs to get a grip. Ignorance isn’t a cute excuse. Next time she might not get her money back.
If women don't know that much about cars why not learn?????? That is very manipulative the same man take advantage of women without even wanting to take time to learn
I think 33% depreciation for 7 months use on a used vehicle is pretty rash... shouldn't have been more than $1,000. The plaintiff should have gotten the full $5K judgement IMHO.
Interesting comment by the defendant in his response to the complaint: "his wife's NEWLY DIVORCED friend." Was that an attempt to throw shade on the plaintiff?
She has a repo order against her now which I’m sure effects her credit and takes money to have it amended? Isn’t that worth another thousand, she was seeking 5 k yet was out 1k and a car but the judge rewarded the dealer 2k basically for fraud. She shouldn’t have been charged for the use of vehicle when she had papers showing falsified documents by dealer.
I just saw an episode where Judge Milian said, "That's why I love small claims court. It's never about the money". Spoken like somebody who's rich and out of touch.
It's ok for her to call people honey but she really gets pissed when people call her honey. Sorry honey but disrespect goes both ways. Even when you're the judge .
He has no contract, no title, no nothing. He does not have the paper trail because it has been 3 years. He says he is still owed money and he does not have his proof? This man is an actual vehicle dealer? Eeesh. She should have asked for the dealers license, to compare his signature.
Fair judgement. Terrible paper work on both sides...especially from a dealer. ALWAYS document well. I also make people sign an AS-IS document so they can't come back later. I also disclose if it had been in any accidents and again, repeat AS-IS. I let them take it to a mechanic and that is also stated in the document. I would ALWAYS win in court because I document clearly. I have never had a buyer walk away because I do my diligence. Tip: If you rent a car and definitely an apartment or house, take several clear and dated photos before you take possession. Landlords notoriously try to make people pay for previous damage. Again, it's very easy if you DOCUMENT.
I'm gonna use this piece of paper as a doily 😂😂😂 This judge cracks me up
“Put your hand down, I’m talkin and it’s interesting” 🤣🤣🤣 I’m rollin!
I died. I'm using that in conversation from now on 🤣
Priceless😜
I laughed with tht statement.
Total the best line ever!!!😅😂🤣
Priceless 😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂
Whoa, why isn't anyone focused on the felony? Last I heard forgery was a crime. Seriously. These people need to report him for his felony offense.
No proof he actually did that he said someone in his office signed that document
HE brought it in for proof, meaning he BACKS that contract
Could be that they already found him "not guilty" of that in criminal court so that's why they took him here to civil court.
If the felony was committed by his employee, I'm not sure he can be charged, but the employee can
The signature could the ex-husband, who she admitted handled the transaction.
Her brother is a good guy. He's standing by his sister, walking her through this crazy situation and trying to protect her. That's dope !!!
Not too bright 😎😎😎😎
@@marmor73no she wasn't...lol
Judge should have taken into consideration that the “dealer” sold the car again and got MORE MONEY FOR THE SAME CAR.
Gold chain, rugged beard, shirt unbuttoned. I live for the shady car dealer cases
He reminds me of my mom's current mistake, I mean husband. You can't trust ANYTHING that comes out of his mouth. He'll say he owned a body shop and in the next breath he says he worked for the guy who owned the body shop. Same thing with this con artist, I'm going to tell you one thing to get you on the hook for something more and then forge your signature to try to get what I want. He's slimy.
He looks like a mafia hit-man who just came back from a vacation in Miami. And he's being sued by a plaintiff named Karen.
I love how the judge always corrects ppl calling someone a “girl” instead of a “woman” 👏 🙌
You go, girl !
@@jsims1617 But she can call people honey?
@@jenniehughes6927 aint nothin wrong with that
AMEN to that!! 👍
only MALES! she never complains when a FEMALE says "girl".
This is why I love this judge! She can see through the defendant that he was lying 😈💪
The Plaintiff should have received ALL of her money back. Crooks may be more hesitant about being crooks, if they know they'll pay a hefty price.
They don't even pay the judgement the show does..guy literally has no reprocussions at all
I agree..all of her money should've been given back to her. Now she has to buy a lesser model car for 4k rather then the 6k?
The show can only order the statutory maximum ...... meaning the maximum one can recover in small claims in the state where the plaintiff lives. Yeah it would be nice to get back all of it. Since she gave the guy 6K, with the statutory limit being 5K, it would have been more fair to give her back 5K ..... but the woman did have use of the truck for those 7 months so yeah, you don't get to rent a truck for nothing ..... guess maybe the judge tossed in a bit more for loss as a lesson for the woman to learn how to take better care of her business .... that excuse that her husband had taken care of everything when the were marriage.... that is a stupid thing for a woman to do .... ya need to know how to take care of yourself.
I wonder whether a judge can award punitive damages to bring the judgement up to the actual loss.
@@somebodywatchin The show can only award up to the statutory max allowed by the state of the plaintiff. So, if the actually amount owed is 6K, but the statutory max is 5k, that would be the most that could be awarded.
Defendant needs jail time
Any dealer should be able to locate a deal on their computer and print the deal paperwork...smh!
Emphasis on “should”. He decided he shouldn’t. Even though he could.
guaranteed that dealer doesn't have paperwork on 50% of the cars he sells, and no computer
That guy is a crook, plain and simple. He should have had to pay the six thousand back.
The most she can award is 5000. Plus remember the show makes the payment. He kept all of her 6000.
He's got a business but doesn't keep the paperwork. Yeah, right!🙄🦘
He gave her a hookup. There was never no paperwork. The defendant knew She was naive. I’m glad the plaintiff won
The defendant is clearly a crook, and intended to rip the Plaintiff off from 1st second of deal. Hope he pays the price of his gross dishonesty.
Well, we could all go to yelp and give this link.
The defendant, who's in the business of selling motor vehicles, somehow doesn't have the paperwork? Hmmm. Either very sloppy record-keeping or shady, and my inclination is toward the latter. I'm curious to see what he later says about the title.
Edit: Sure enough, a highly suspicious signature on the lien papers. Defendant's credibility is in the toilet. And the funniest part to me is that he was fussing with his "documentation" before Douglas moved him over to be sworn in. What documentation did he have?
Each state would have firm document retention periods articulated for these documents, and dealers, for sure, must be aware of that. For bill of sale for vehicles, in my state, I think it’s 7 years.
People often come in to court rambling papers like they have all this evidence when they don’t have nothing! 😆😆🤦🏽♂️
@@nondescriptnyc Yeah it’s 7 years, but not just for vehicles but businesses in general that make sales.
Disorganization normally stems from Laziness
@@robbbietheim2096 I'm not convinced it was disorganization so much as hiding incriminating evidence.
It’s so obvious the defendant is a liar and a thief. Anyone living in his area who’s needing a used car should take note.
It would be in his best interest to hire a company to assist him with paperwork organization 🤦
He should be in jail
Congratulations, you're the first comment I've ever seen seen on TH-cam that correctly uses the word "who's" versus "whose."
The plaintiff is a thief as well- expecting ALL her money back.
I used to flip cars when one could buy a junker for $100, clean it (my old lady did that), tune it up and sell it the next day for $500. I had people coming back because something broke months later.
I can understand what the plaintiff is talking about when she says she doesn’t know anything because her husband used to handle everything. If/when my husband passes before me it’s going to be very difficult for me to take over doing everything. He does the bills, repairs, and maintains everything.
Wow you better learn fast
@ Actually I just got diagnosed with the worst kind of cancer, so chances are he’ll live longer than me.
7 month use of the truck is hardly worth $2000, or in this case a whopping 33% of what she paid for it. I'd say the plaintiff got the worse end of the deal.
It costs $1000/month to rent a car. I say $285/month is a pretty fair deal.
@@jamslam5641 yea except she wasn’t renting the car. Everyone knows renting a car costs more than the ownership. So to treat the 7 months like a rental is, essentially, causing her to lose money in this transaction. The man essentially got to rent the car out and make a profit and then repossessing the car. Not to mention the judge blatantly ignored the felony of signature forgery.
Agreed, I would have thought the $1000 between cost and state max would have been fine to cover the 7 months.
@@willchow3315 What was she supposed to do about the forgery? It's a felony so she has no jurisdiction, nor was that a part of the original case.
Nothing in the world is free including using a car for 7 months. $2k was a fair judgement.
This is bad business to buy and sell without papers.
She shouldn’t have had to pay a dime. He tried to extort her, then repossessed the car illegally AND had someone forge her name on the paperwork!
Judge Milian is so real and down to earth. I like her and how she is funny and says it as it is.
so do I she's the best
Car dealer is a jerk. I wouldn’t buy anything from him.
That defendant couldn't lie straight in bed. What a crook.
Defendant definitely needs to be reported and shut down! Good judgment Judge M! ✌
"What's in your brain?!" Well, not much as it turns out...
Judge was super sassy on this one. I love it!!!
This lady is trippin me out. She doesn't know how to do anything without a man, can't even talk. She looks at her brother to speak for her. Damn. 🤦🏽♀️😂
I was thinking the same thing. 👍
Exactly
lol well if she doesnt know wtf shes talking about of course she'd ask someone who does know to talk about it
She did fine, having someone else there can help. And she said her previous husband did all of the business end of the marriage, which is a nice perk---however, the other spouse should have some business knowledge.
Totally, she seems lost.
WTF!!! she has to pay the crook 2K for the time she had the car even thro the decision was that the dealer had no evidence that they had agreed on a different price of $7300: What dealer would hand over the car and not provide a written contract to the amount owning? and it's obvious the dealer forged the signature. Such a bad decision by the Judge.
The Judge was a repossessed cars back in the day? This woman is absolutely incredible. What an inspiration.
The only reason he didn't bring the paperwork was because it would have ruined his case, you don't have to be a genius to work that out. Given that, he sold it for $6k and then committed forgery, and then illegally repossessed it after trying to scam another $1400. Then the judge makes her pay $2000 for the privilege of driving it?!
Another poor decision there.
Out of the 6k that she paid she got 4K because she used the truck for 2 months. That is fair.
She used it for 7 months but since he jacked her around and tried to extort more money from her AND had someone forge her name she shouldn’t have had to pay anything.
love how real this judge gets.
I've bought cars but NEVER left without a bill of sale and title.
I understand that the DMV would keep the title if the vehicle wasn't paid for but not having a bill of sale is just stupid. A dealer without paperwork is just wrong.
Do the plaintiffs brother looks like he could be related to Mel Gibson? Maybe just me lol
i didn’t see it till you said it. But now i can’t unsee it.
Yes I thought so too. Kirkland brand Mel Gibson 😅
@@Rockydogdays Yesssss🤣🤣🤣
No way does he look anything like Mel
Poor bastard. Mel is a nut case.🦘
Put your hand down I’m talking and it’s interesting 😅😂😂😂😂😂 I love her.. she’s hilarious 🤣 ❤❤
Stop going to the streets with the same questions .. he asks the same question when the case involves purchasing a car
Worst part of the show
What an absolute con man he is. He conveniently has no bill of sale or title. Then there is the document with the forged signature that they brought to court while under oath. His excuse for not having the paperwork is that it was 3 years ago. So what! He should bring that to court. She was naive unfortunately. Could they not bring a charge against him for the forged signature? I think JM should have awarded her 5000, which is the maximum she can award. 2000 for 7 months use is too much. The saddest part of this is that the defendant does not make the payout. The show does. So he actually gets to keep the 6000. He is a scammer and a crook. One good thing is that they mention the name of his company so if you are in Florida looking for a vehicle just refer to this video to see where NOT to go.
Amen!!! Totally agree. Totally agree! Not sure why she didn't return that chics money. The friggin guy earned double profit, her money and more money when he sold it again! Not to mention he committed a felony with the forgery! He filed forged documents to the courts to illegally steal the truck. Then committed more forgery and fraud by continuing the felony in her court under oath! If it was me I'd file a formal complaint with attorney general, and go after his dealer lisc, and file police report for forgery and theft of vehicle. She has the proof and now vid proof too with this court case. It wouldn't be Abt the money at this point, I'd be after his livelihood. His pockets
I agree with each point you made! There are plenty of videos too where I'm thinking "damn I wish they were the ones actually paying for this" lol.
All I could think about this whole show was how much the plaintifs brother looks and sounds just like Mel Gibson. That was his doppelganger.
Yes!
Wow busted for forgery! He needs to definitely lose his dealer lisc. And he filed court documents, based on this forgery. Wow. Crime. Then just handed the judge this forged document under oath. Report and file a case against this crook
His secretary signed it.
Because he had her sign it.
Who buys a car with no title? When you finance a car you STILL get a title, but the lienholder is on title too. I can't believe she let him get away with it, with a forgery to boot. She really missed the boat on this one. So he got to sell the car twice and she put the bite on the plaintiff for 2k. That sounds like good motivation for the scammer to keep on scamming.
I have never had a title to a car as long as I'm making payments. The title comes in the mail after the last payment is made.
@@auaiao9 Exactly
@@auaiao9 It was registered to the company that loaned the money to you and your name isn't on the title? That means you had no liability, that's awesome. No insurance premiums. What state do you live in? I want to buy a car there.
@@michaeldose2041 My cars were never registered to the companies that loaned me money. I said they hold on to the titles until the last payment is made.
@@auaiao9 If your name is on the title you have a right to hold the title.
That is wild that the judge was a repo man!!! She knows everything about how hinkey all this is. So funny. And, yes, interesting!
$2000 depreciation rate in 7 months for a $6000 vehicle? come on that’s a lot
I’m glad the judge wasn’t so hard on her when she said her ex husband took care of everything. It’s sad some women live like that but they do.
She honestly didn’t know
Wait,my wife loves that I take care of the cars and paying bills!so speak for yourself!
@@ihateutube1143
Thats great for you and your wife, but if (heaven forbid) something happens to you, will your wife know how to do those things herself? That’s why this situation was sad, the lady honestly didn’t know the procedure and thus got swindled. As for you, as long as your wife knows how to do those things on her own (or, knows how to find out how to do those things on her own) then it’s all good if she is choosing to let you handle it instead. 👍
I think she should have gotten all her money back and more
Smh the whole excuse that she is totally clueless bc she was married for x amount of years is pathetic!!!
I’m using this paper work as my waters paper doily!! 😳 Ha!!!
Next was ~YOU’RE NOT PICKING UP WHAT IM PUTTING DOWN! 😂😂 Judge M is too funny, pretty much a bad ass after she started yelling!
He conveniently lost the paper work then committed a felony then illegally repossessed the truck? If he did this to her, this is probably his normal practice. He needs to go to jail!
Give the woman her 6 grand.
He tried to scam her out of money 💰,why else wouldn't he have proof that it was 73 thousand dollars or whatever 🤔 smh come on
What a dingy woman! Who buys a vehicle without getting documentation!
The dealer was playing a scam game. He sold her a car, then just added the additional tax and other taxes, costs to the agreed $6000 total. This is a common tactic, so buyer beware.
He seriously needs to loose his license until he fixes his act up! Not to mention the forged signature that the dealer probably convinced his clerk to forge before she quit.
I truly don't understand people giving another person cash or check without getting something back acknowledging you gave them money
I'm surprised the judge didn't say you don't give the money out of one hand unless you have a receipt in the other hand
when I bought a used car from a salesman like this we paid the first months payment to him and then he called regarding the second months payment for us to come down and pay it, yet he said we never paid the first month! he said I am positive because I have a carbon copy notebook and I never tear out the original, only the copy. and your's Is not here! we were flabbergasted as we were holding the receipt in our hands. we had to drive all the way down there to show them. I can only imagine how many people they get over like that.
That guy is a crook! Those lumps on his nose are karmic bullets from all the bad deeds he has committed! Glad he got called by the judge in this case.
Wouldn't buy a bag of potato chips from the defendant!!! Because he's a crook !
I can’t believe she only gave her 4k. He didn’t deserve to keep that much money after scamming her. He’s full of crap.
The saying " blond and dumb? Husband did everything so I can just keep on being pretty and stupid.😁😆
Ikr
Why these people had no paperwork for proof is beyond me - the judge has to have paperwork for evidence so the judge can be fair - paperwork is a requirement and has to be legal
Aww you can tell the guy loves his sister ❤ you can tell they were maybe close growing up
Defendant knew the plaintiff was naive and took her for a full ride. Thank god she has a brother who stepped in.
I thank God I had two brothers who were auto mechanics. They looked out for me.
Love love Judge Milian!
I hope and pray that she doesn't retire from People's Court.
Love when she's says Honey!
They should have cops to arrest crooks who have the audacity to submit forged documents and thinking they would get away with it. I mean where's the retribution, dude lied about everything, forged documents and still gets to keep 2000 dollars.
Not much real justice in the justice system
They should have institutions to hold people like her ,with no common sense, in them until a chaperone is found.. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It's true that people like him should be punished but come on!!
And he resold it for even more profit. That's what scammers do.
That car dealer is a crook
He gets to keep the 6000. The litigants don't pay the judgements, the show pays. So the end result is even more unfair.
Defendant very shady!! Plaintiff needs some life lessons.
I like this judge, like Judge Judy, we need more cases from her. She takes no nonsense from idiots
She's better than judge Judy. Find Judy irritatimg and trying to go through as many cases possible in a hour
@@colinsushiboy745 Both Judges dont take nonsense from the litigators and decisions are quick.
I have a sneaky feeling that document was signed by him. The judge should've have had him sign her name in his handwriting. To see if it matched the forged signature. Because I'm thinking it was him. Because then if that was proven he did. Couldn't she sue him again for forgery?
Also, this is why I never go to anyone for cars except for one guy who is my Dad's best friend. You can't trust car dealers. At least with my Dad's friend he is straight up honest. Even told me a car I was interested in wasn't worth it. And that the car had lots of issues. And there was a reason it was still on the lot 7 months later.
Yes but if she asked him to sign her name in his signature he would not be stupid enough to sign it the same way as on the lien document. He would just make something up that doesn't match.
@@stephenbanks5952 Okay point.
I don't think so, it was very neat handwriting, I guarantee it was his secretary.
@@stephenbanks5952 There are handwriting experts that can make you do that; but, they're only called in for highest profile cases, the gov't cases involving hundreds of millions of dollars; or, the forgery of some high top official.
@@phlushphish793 I am not understanding what you mean. My only point is that if he.had signed that document and the judge asked him to make a signature for her to compare he would not be stupid enough to sign the same way as on the document. He would sign in a different style. This was in response to the original comment. I see what you mean about handwriting experts being used in larger cases. This would not warrant that.
Dude is definitely a Crook! How does he get to keep his dealers license after the airing of this on national TV.....????
I mean, I agree that using the car for months is worth something but $2000?! The guy's a crook! She should've gotten the entire amount.
I made the same mistake. I handed over a check for a car without asking for the title. I believe the dealer deliberately held the title to make sure the check cleared. After it cleared he contacted me and told me he was gonna mail me the title.
I once sold a car to a junk yard. They would come tow it for me! I asked the guy, "Don't I have to sign some paperwork?" "We'll take care of all the paperwork." Well, they didn't. I started getting bills for skipped tolls in San Francisco. I lived in L.A. They took those skipped tolls off my tax return!
@@phlushphish793 Yeah, you needed to do a title transfer. I only know this from seeing the signs in my local DMV when I go pay my property taxes. Hopefully, you've taken care of that issue.
Hello from Ohio ✌🏻 Stay safe out there!.
Hello from Ontario Canada 🇨🇦 and I hope y’all have a great weekend ahead!!! 🙂
Hello bad gurl from Ohio
I adore the sibling relationship.
Refreshing to see.
I been a auto mechanic involved with dealerships, private owners, buy here/pay here, corporate and of course myself. I trust a politician telling the truth before a used car sales person.
I have never loved the plaintiffs more.
That’s why I love her she doesn’t let anyone get away with anything
This is the number one reason you never buy a used car without a clear title and pay for it when you purchase it.
He’s a fraud and a lazy one at that. Minimal effort. That lady needs to get a grip. Ignorance isn’t a cute excuse. Next time she might not get her money back.
If women don't know that much about cars why not learn?????? That is very manipulative the same man take advantage of women without even wanting to take time to learn
Amen!!!
A nice deep voice??? Well THAT'S sure changed!!!🤣🤣🤣
I think 33% depreciation for 7 months use on a used vehicle is pretty rash... shouldn't have been more than $1,000. The plaintiff should have gotten the full $5K judgement IMHO.
7 months for $2k and the car is worth six, that’s too much!
Interesting comment by the defendant in his response to the complaint: "his wife's NEWLY DIVORCED friend." Was that an attempt to throw shade on the plaintiff?
I think yes, which makes the defendant seem even shadier.
She has a repo order against her now which I’m sure effects her credit and takes money to have it amended? Isn’t that worth another thousand, she was seeking 5 k yet was out 1k and a car but the judge rewarded the dealer 2k basically for fraud. She shouldn’t have been charged for the use of vehicle when she had papers showing falsified documents by dealer.
He is a scammer and should be out of business!!
The dealership owner even looks shady!!
She should I've been awarded $5,000 at least.
"I'm going to use this as a doily for my water" - omg! hilarious
I just saw an episode where Judge Milian said, "That's why I love small claims court. It's never about the money". Spoken like somebody who's rich and out of touch.
What a swindler
5:31 Poor guy. My man in the black is falling asleep.
It's ok for her to call people honey but she really gets pissed when people call her honey.
Sorry honey but disrespect goes both ways. Even when you're the judge .
I disagree with the judge's ruling. Maybe $500 or $1000 for 6 months use for all the problems he put her though and all
Her brother is right…the dealer is a Crook! Most dealerships or car dealers are crooks! Hopefully she learned something from this.
The defendant is a crook. Every state strongly regulates car dealers and paperwork is #1.
Mel Gibson and Goldie Hawn
How do you get to be her age and not get a receipt?
WTF??? Dude seems to be a straight up criminal.
Shady! What kind of dealer is this guy?
WOW! plaintiff is used to "being taken care of" & doesn't have a FREAKING CLUE!🤔 SURPRISED! she gotten this far!
I had exact same thought....
Neither party seems prepared for court....this is what happens when New Yorkers move to Florida....he had no problem finding his gold
$2,000 For 7 months of use? Yikes! But it does out to less than $10/day. Still he did her wrong..😣
He has no contract, no title, no nothing. He does not have the paper trail because it has been 3 years. He says he is still owed money and he does not have his proof? This man is an actual vehicle dealer? Eeesh. She should have asked for the dealers license, to compare his signature.
Fair judgement.
Terrible paper work on both sides...especially from a dealer. ALWAYS document well. I also make people sign an AS-IS document so they can't come back later. I also disclose if it had been in any accidents and again, repeat AS-IS. I let them take it to a mechanic and that is also stated in the document. I would ALWAYS win in court because I document clearly. I have never had a buyer walk away because I do my diligence.
Tip: If you rent a car and definitely an apartment or house, take several clear and dated photos before you take possession. Landlords notoriously try to make people pay for previous damage. Again, it's very easy if you DOCUMENT.