I wish DCS have this level of carrier operations. Mind blowing. When I saw this episode in bf3 for the first time, the atmosphere of the moment shocked me. Going from underneath of a deck, seeing the storm and then aproaching this f-18 waiting in readiness then climbing physicaly into that cockpit. Amazing atmosphere really.
arda şişman, that fact that the plane is already on the catapult and that nobody seemed to flick a switch, when the person in the back seat does a lot. The ICP panel wasn't even touched, and the helmet visor system is only on the F-35
i don't know if we're talking about the same thing but I just saw a documentary on the USS Nimitz and the F-18 pilots were most certainly using these $150K helmet visor systems.
Back to the day when me and my friends tried to invaded the aircaft carrier by the helicopter. We shot down a jet with a machine gun, haha was fun. Man I miss them :(
Pure fantasy. Su-35 is the 4++ generation fighter with vector thrust module. It is destined and engineered for super-maneuverable close combat air superiority. No way the older FA-18 could defeat it like that. The video is spectacular though, no doubt )
I get that in a maneuvering fight, the SU35 is the more maneuverable... But, as has been proven COUNTLESS times in 100's of defense studies... Supermaneuverability counts for nothing as most engagements take place in a BVR environment. The F18E/F has a smaller radar cross-section than the SU35 and also a weaker thermal signature... The fact that the SU35's were able to sneak up to that range on the F18F was unrealistic, especially considering the F18F was still quite close to the carrier strike group and would have had its Datalink active. In modern air combat, the first to see the enemy will win the engagement. With missiles that can be lethal out to 70miles, there is A LOT of distance for a supermaneuverable fighter to cover before its supermaneuverability is of any value at all. The last point, the study also showed that supermaneuverability can be a negative in a 'guns fight'. Why? because every time an aircraft exceeds AOA limitations, it bleeds off airspeed (energy). Dog fights are generally decided through clever energy management. So, pulling a 'cobra' will get the chaser to overshoot, however, while recovering from the 'cobra', being too slow and needing to recover energy by pushing nose down, the chase aircraft will have gone into the vertical and will separate distance allowing it to come over the top and resume chase as the 'cobra' aircraft dives to regain its lost energy. Supermaneuverability can be quite effective, BUT, if you miscalculate or the enemy anticipates it, the supermaneuverability becomes a death sentence. The F18E/F is an EXTREMELY lethal aircraft in 'guns fights' as it has excellent low energy state handling characteristics, excellent rate performance, and excellent AOA authority. In summary, broad/general statements like "In a real dogfight though, that F/A18 would have been neutralized. A flanker is a flanker", is premature at best. The F18E/F have access to the AIM9X which is one of the most maneuverable infra-red missiles in the world and can be fired at a close in target, high off-boresight... Meaning, the F18E/F doesn't need to be pointed at the SU35 at all, the pilot can simply look at it with his/her HMCS and fire the missile with very little reaction time for the SU35. US aircraft manufacturers have proven they can make supermaneuverable aircraft... Look at the F15X and the F22... So why do they not bother to push for supermaneuverability? Have a think about it... If supermaneuverability was such an advantage, wouldn't there be a big push for it? Don't get me wrong, the SU35 is a sexy jet, but let's not forget the important facts here. The SU35 is literally an SU27 with thrust vectoring and upgraded avionics. It was originally named the SU27M... The airframe is still based on the 1970's design. This is why Russia is not mass producing the SU35 but instead decided to go ahead with the SU57. There have been 139 SU35's built, GLOBALLY... 24 of these SU35's are for China. Russia already has 12 operational SU57's and is building an additional 150... So, if SU35 was so great... Why didn't Russia start building them more seriously? Why not update the aging 359 SU27's still in active service with the Russian Armed Forces? The reason is that the SU35 offers no significant advantage over the SU27, at least, not enough to warrant updating them. Final point... SU35 is classed as a 4+ generation multirole fighter by the Russian Defense Ministry and by NATO. The F18E/F is classed as a 4+ generation multirole fighter by the Russian Defense Ministry and by NATO. I don't get why people instantly think the SU35 is so much more dangerous than western equivalents... 'Air show' tricks are ineffective in combat... Especially when the enemy sees you before you can see them and has more advanced weaponry...
2:30 🔥 The best part of it is nothing but watching the action taken off the jet with the mixture of the soundtrack gives me the goose of hen. It's from where we recognize the real gamers of battlefield🔥👌🏿🦾
Got say, this still look awesome in 2016 and will be in 2017 very soon. It's not just raw graphic processing power, but how Frostbite 2 handles reflection and occlusion and the environmental artist to take advantage of all that. Most assets in this scene were never used again in game. It's a hell of a tech-demo.
This is such a ridiculous clip, at this close range missiles don't have enough time to arm themselves. This is textbook dogfighting that's best done with cannons, yet all the Hornets do is launch AA missiles...
I know it's a game, but I can't just suspend my 'issues'...it's my genetic defect. That said, I admit this was a solid part of BF3, it was entertaining, despite flaws like, Iranians not having Su-35s (not russians, this mission was a strike against Mehrabad airport in Tehran) so it's iranians the US planes are fighting against, not russians IRCC. Oh well, it's like the other clip where M1 Abrams fight against Iranian T72s...they make it look like the T72s have a chance, when they don't.
The suspension of disbelief is based on the difference between your culture and the programmers'/designers' and their reserch. For this reason it is easier for children/kid to "believe" in certain situations and have fun out of them. You have my same problem and unfortunately games with these kind of "errors" are unable to push me over the rainbow. I enjoy them to some extent, but guns, vehicles, history facts and even historical buildings are often wrong, and that is enough to burst my bubble. "It's a game", yes, and behind it there are tens of millions of dollars and thousand of people who are not able to turn it into something more... something for someone who knows more than the average Joe. To each is own, I guess. :-(
@@gvudrt8266 realistic means being/almost being 1 to 1 scale of the real life counter part. (Which almost none of them in the game) Attention to detail means the quality/some stuffs of the game example of it is what you just said. The debris flying through your plane when you hit it with a missile
Zach P You're right, if they were looking for enemy planes to shoot at they wouldve used the f22. but then again, the f22 would end that fight in a couple seconds, not good for gameplay.
To be serious, flying through the air isn't just, air. There's a lot of particulate in the air. Grains of dust, rock, carbon, ice - ect. When you flying on average of 600 MPH, you're going to get scratches. In reality, fighter craft have their canopies replaced every so often on a regular schedule. They're made of a Plexiglas that, not only get's scratch up, but get's weak over time thanks to the sun. Advanced fighter craft canopies use classified laminate materials that include things like gold and other metals for RAM (Radar Absorbent Material) effects to assist in low RCS / Stealth features. The F-22 replaces it's canopy after every 800 flight hours.
тоже понравилось ,а вот батлу 5 я уже прошёл вообще без интереса ради галочки как в принципе и батлу 1 не зацепило ,будем надеяться что новую часть сделают с современной войной
Оооо...Патриотня на связи! Успокойся. Вступать с моделью 70х годов разработки ( Т-10С) в виражный бой....На сверзвуковых...Ахахахахахаха.... Собьют еще на взлете.
Even while playing I was skeptical as to how close are the two hornets during fly-by over the carrier group. Destroyers firing cruise missiles as the jets are yet to clear the airspace? And the dogfight? So up close with the enemy fighters?
в игре то все красиво. только откуда у него столько ракет? он по каждому самолету выпускал минимум 4 ракеты, а то и 6 и 8. а сбил около 10 самолетов. при чем СУшки ни разу по нему не стреляли ракетами, а из пушки всегда мазали. хотя 30мм снаряд у наших пушек даже пролетев в 10 см от крыла своей энергией разорвет обшивку, а если попадет, то даже 1 снаряд и самолету конец. у них самолеты не бронированы как у нас. и у них 20 мм пушки, а у нас 30 мм. от наших нет шансов спастись. ракеты наши ближнего боя в разы лучше. это они точно знают. но больше смешно то, что су-35 так легко дал зайти себе в спину, будто сам подставлялся. а когда сушки были сзади - они ни разу не стреляли ракетами. вобщем сказка.
@@alien6568 , ну да. когда самолеты летают - бывает что они и падают. но это когда есть чему падать. как и в любой другой стране падают точно так же , где есть чему летать. это не про твою страну. где ничего не делают и ничего не летает.
That's Battelfield 3 for you.. Played it thrice on PS3 still can't get over it.. Awesome gameplay right from on field combat to street shootings,tanks , Fighter jets.. perfect .. just perfect !
FaKu_Zulu I understood. You don`t know about su35 TH-cam you will see the aircraft. Learn thrust vector control technology. After this talk with you about the maneuverability su35. Time reversal su35 - 36 degrees / sec. But SU30, SU35, SU37..... have Supermaneuverability mode. You know whati is that?? NO? )))) "Supermaneuverability" means the ability to maneuver the aircraft without restrictions on the angle of attack. US aircraft do not have this. F18 - an ancient clumsy bucket. This is a funny game. Fantastic. Your faith the power of the US more and more calls our smile))))))
Maneuver aircraft without restrictions? So you mean s SU-35 can do 360 in 1 second? Without killing a pilot? About 40 or more G? How? What is life? LEAVE RUSSIAN BIASED KID.
Battlefield can still improve. When an AA missile is fired, it should no longer be see in your wings. In this case, several missiles were fired from the Super Hornet, however, none of them was removed from the pylons. Also, the other player from another airframe should be able to visually see that its colleague is running out of missiles. Hope to see such improvements in the software logic.
Who told you that story tale?? I'm an Airman, and we never launched on a fucking carrier.. FYI, the biggest fleet it's owned by the Air Force, the 2nd biggest fleet it's owned by the Navy.. These fighters are launched by a big ass boat "A.K.A" Aircraft Carrier. Those are navy pilots man. lol
That's what I'm saying.. My goodness, I'm a fan of video games as well.. But a little bit of common sense and some Google research doesn't hurt 😂 BTW.. I used to play Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X
This is just a game. Su35 is too strong for the the F18. You can even see how the game level is lowered at 5:10 when the Su 35 makes the cobra maneuver, it could easily shoot the F18 and keep its lock as long as it wished, but since this is just a game, it didn't. Notice that the radius of curvature when the Su 35 turns is much lower than the F18 (because of the 3D thrust vectorial capabilities of its two boosters), that's why the Su 35 is far more maneuverable than the F18 and in reality, much much tough (any pilot will agree)
Um... Yes? SU 35 is a close encounterment aircraft. F-18 Is a long distant support modeled aircraft meant to spot and engage from a distance, as SU 35 is able to maneuver and have better maneuverment in low speed dog fight scenarios.
Firing up DCS. Lifting off .... I see no enemy .. boom dead. Lifting off again ... i ... boom. Crap game. I am supposed to see them all the time, and hit them all the time, I am also supposed to be able to take any amount of canon fire without any systems damage cause my aircraft have this or that many hit points FFS .. it does have hitpoints right?????
MajSolo I know right? I fired off BMS went to the plane on hanger. pressed 'E' engine won't even start!!! Like nothing I pressed managed to even start the engine I tried all the keys and joystick buttons. Proceed to load myself in taxiway. Radar doesn't work. like WTF? So loaded myself in the air, get warning about enemy and radar doesn't autolock!! like what joke is this? I can't even see them and then everything in my cockpit starts flashing and beeping and I am dead. Completely unrealistic.
its a simulator ffs not your average battlefield game where u just hop into the jet and start blowing up stuff. most of the people who're good at flying in battlefield will never be as close to good in dcs as they are in battlefield.
Arcade games are more fun for some people. That's not bad, that's just a style. But Battlefield 3 is not a simulator. Now if you want to improve your skills, airplane simulator are just better. The learning curve is super high yes. But it's more rewarding. The combats are more intense because you can be killed easily and your airplane is bond to the laws of aerodynamics. For example, you can't do a stupid infinite U-Turn in a simulator. This (real) limit create a tension the closer you get to it.
I'm American all the way, America has some stunning aircraft, the B2, F-15, F/A-18s and so does Russia, with their absolutely beautiful sukhois and migs, but let's face the facts, the likely hood of an F/A-18 out maneuvering a suhkoi? That's very unlikely, but it's a American video game so of course they will, but realistically, I doubt it
NapalmTaylor д you’re ignoring a dozen other factors- targeting systems, EW radars, flight tactics, weapon capabilities, pilot training... air to air warfare isn’t like a movie. It’s not Top Gun. A section of F/A-18s launched directly off a carrier group has a massive advantage, before they’re even in the air
Блять, Война в ИСПАНИИ!!! в середине 30ых годов показало то, что МАНЕВРЕННЫЙ БОЙ - ХУЙНЯ ! А в электронике и в ракетостроении США нас уделывает как Тузик грелку. Давай , напиши мне с Айфона, или с Виндовса, что это не так...
kind of true but when you start the campaign in BF3 it asks you how do you want it means ( Easy, Medium, Hard) if you choose hard than the enemy wont be kindergarden kids
Yeah I saw some comment saying American dreams and then some American said it’s not a dream and other Russians said shut up we will obliterate your country
kayakutah On top of that the enemy was apparently 8 miles from the fleet..which might I add had anothet carrier directly behind the Bush (the one Shark flight comes from). Have fun launching birds off that carrier.
@@bert3064 I don’t have to be a fighter pilot to know something is unrealistic. Let’s break it down, you don’t discuss classified missions in the hallways, there are specific rooms where classified information can be discussed. The hud is wrong for the super Hornet, the pre flight checks are wrong (not my words, the words of an actual hornet pilot) Pilot is the shooter, WSO is more for A/G missions, using the targeting pod and what not
@@T.2.T wow, fake propaganda by citizen of a zero credible nation. I want to tell everyone, according to Pakistani people and their fake propaganda spreaded by themselves on internet that they still believe 'M.M alam' was the best fighter pilot and no other nation's pilots was near him but in reality many articles and the list of top 10 fighter pilots were published by the authentic news source and they never mentioned the name any Pakistani pilot. every best fighter pilots were from germany, Russia, U.k, italy and U.S.
Despite what the title states, the US Air Force does not utilize the F/A18. The Super Hornet is flown by the US Marines and US Navy. I doubt that there are many Air Force jocks that are carrier qualified.
Seriously......we are talking about catapult launched high performance jets, not helios. Yes, the Army's 160th SOAR regiment are qualified to operate from Wasp Class assault ships like like the USS Battan or USS Kearsarge but again these are rotary wing and VTOL platforms, not Nimitz Class carriers such as the Reagan or Stennis.
None of them are... but they are better at landing in a crosswind though. All inter-service teasing aside though, this was the dumbest dogfight mission in any video game ever made. And yes, the title of this video is completely nonsensical.
Sure, they keep 'em nice and tight so that they get covered by at least 1 meter of snow and ice. Improves the flying capabilities of the machine... Also it's perfectly normal to have it covered with ice when it's raining outside. LOL
Like this he can conquer the whole world.... They made it a cup of tea.. Good kill...only one fighter paralyzed the whole Air force... No anti aircraft guns install on ground... Anyway good efforts
okay, 5:10 hawkin start to turn his head 360°... i don't know how he look in the bandit cockpit cam...lol now i know the fact why su35 defeated by f18... U.S.af bringing they creepy ghost to defeating anything...😂😂😂
It looks great but is unrealistic in many ways. You'd NEVER have two carriers working so close together. The timing, scale, and speeds of air combat are all wrong. And any fighter to fighter combat engagement will start well beyond visual range. You'll never see your opponent with the naked eye until he's on fire and heading straight down. Or you screwed up really, REALLY badly.
so what? I played DCS, real combat simulation is really hard and i guess real life is even harder. it took me hours to learn the system on that sim game until i could engage a target. unless you're a hardcore air sim fan, you don't want that kind of realism which is both hard to learn and hard to master.
batllefield 3 was in my opinion one of the best shooters out there. It really made you feel like a soldier in action!
SideCap arma
vebavid I know but that's not alwatys full of those action/movie/explosion moments. Bf3 doe give u that.
SideCap this is the campaign of bf3
every Battlefield game does that so well
dandrixxx LMAOO, bf1 *cough* *cough*
5:08 loves that Kobra maneuver🔥🔥
Pugachev Cobra
but useless
@@ИИванов-ь6с are you stupid?
@@grzyb11 ur stupid it's useless in 21st century coz of hmd's and more capable wvr missiles
@@greenglitch1390
It's not useless in close air combat.
I wish DCS have this level of carrier operations. Mind blowing. When I saw this episode in bf3 for the first time, the atmosphere of the moment shocked me. Going from underneath of a deck, seeing the storm and then aproaching this f-18 waiting in readiness then climbing physicaly into that cockpit. Amazing atmosphere really.
BF3 is game but DCS isn't...
This game still holds up after almost a decade. The graphics, sound effects, dialogue, and gameplay were enthralling.
Shooting down flanker - e just in your dream. On real fight you was locking from beyond.
Beautiful yes. Realistic no.
why ? do you mean unlimited flare and missiles ?
arda şişman, that fact that the plane is already on the catapult and that nobody seemed to flick a switch, when the person in the back seat does a lot. The ICP panel wasn't even touched, and the helmet visor system is only on the F-35
didn't realize that :D
i don't know if we're talking about the same thing but I just saw a documentary on the USS Nimitz and the F-18 pilots were most certainly using these $150K helmet visor systems.
Joey Zee, oh yes. my bad. The Navy is just getting more and more new technology. It's crazy. X D
Just switched from COD to BF, best thing I've done in awhile
Yeah when it comes together campaign Battlefield is always king. As for online I'll always love COD.
I switched from Reynolds Wrap to condoms best thing I've done in a long time!!!
This is not a real simulator is it? More like Afterburner...
For me bf and arma 3 are better than cod.
Still playing Halo?
Back to the day when me and my friends tried to invaded the aircaft carrier by the helicopter. We shot down a jet with a machine gun, haha was fun. Man I miss them :(
Ma scène préfėrė dans Battlefield,j'ai le jeu sur Xbox.
What is game name
@@apexlegands2197 baatlefield 3
How the fuck does nobody realize this is Battlefield 3?
Patricio Pereyra yeh i know
Pure fantasy. Su-35 is the 4++ generation fighter with vector thrust module. It is destined and engineered for super-maneuverable close combat air superiority. No way the older FA-18 could defeat it like that. The video is spectacular though, no doubt )
dude, let americans have a dream. :)))
Indeed ) That's the American Dream nowadays.
thats true. the Su-35 is much advanced and better than the F/A-18
also true, but it depends on the pilot too, and this is a game based on us military, it's not rare if they shoot down a su-35 with a f-4 ; )
Let them dream
5:04 WOW! that Pugachev´s Cobra maneuver!
In a real dogfight though, that F/A18 would have been neutralized.
A flanker is a flanker ;)
I get that in a maneuvering fight, the SU35 is the more maneuverable... But, as has been proven COUNTLESS times in 100's of defense studies...
Supermaneuverability counts for nothing as most engagements take place in a BVR environment.
The F18E/F has a smaller radar cross-section than the SU35 and also a weaker thermal signature...
The fact that the SU35's were able to sneak up to that range on the F18F was unrealistic, especially considering the F18F was still quite close to the carrier strike group and would have had its Datalink active.
In modern air combat, the first to see the enemy will win the engagement. With missiles that can be lethal out to 70miles, there is A LOT of distance for a supermaneuverable fighter to cover before its supermaneuverability is of any value at all.
The last point, the study also showed that supermaneuverability can be a negative in a 'guns fight'.
Why? because every time an aircraft exceeds AOA limitations, it bleeds off airspeed (energy).
Dog fights are generally decided through clever energy management.
So, pulling a 'cobra' will get the chaser to overshoot, however, while recovering from the 'cobra', being too slow and needing to recover energy by pushing nose down, the chase aircraft will have gone into the vertical and will separate distance allowing it to come over the top and resume chase as the 'cobra' aircraft dives to regain its lost energy.
Supermaneuverability can be quite effective, BUT, if you miscalculate or the enemy anticipates it, the supermaneuverability becomes a death sentence.
The F18E/F is an EXTREMELY lethal aircraft in 'guns fights' as it has excellent low energy state handling characteristics, excellent rate performance, and excellent AOA authority.
In summary, broad/general statements like "In a real dogfight though, that F/A18 would have been neutralized.
A flanker is a flanker", is premature at best.
The F18E/F have access to the AIM9X which is one of the most maneuverable infra-red missiles in the world and can be fired at a close in target, high off-boresight... Meaning, the F18E/F doesn't need to be pointed at the SU35 at all, the pilot can simply look at it with his/her HMCS and fire the missile with very little reaction time for the SU35.
US aircraft manufacturers have proven they can make supermaneuverable aircraft... Look at the F15X and the F22...
So why do they not bother to push for supermaneuverability?
Have a think about it... If supermaneuverability was such an advantage, wouldn't there be a big push for it?
Don't get me wrong, the SU35 is a sexy jet, but let's not forget the important facts here.
The SU35 is literally an SU27 with thrust vectoring and upgraded avionics. It was originally named the SU27M...
The airframe is still based on the 1970's design.
This is why Russia is not mass producing the SU35 but instead decided to go ahead with the SU57.
There have been 139 SU35's built, GLOBALLY... 24 of these SU35's are for China.
Russia already has 12 operational SU57's and is building an additional 150...
So, if SU35 was so great... Why didn't Russia start building them more seriously? Why not update the aging 359 SU27's still in active service with the Russian Armed Forces?
The reason is that the SU35 offers no significant advantage over the SU27, at least, not enough to warrant updating them.
Final point...
SU35 is classed as a 4+ generation multirole fighter by the Russian Defense Ministry and by NATO.
The F18E/F is classed as a 4+ generation multirole fighter by the Russian Defense Ministry and by NATO.
I don't get why people instantly think the SU35 is so much more dangerous than western equivalents...
'Air show' tricks are ineffective in combat... Especially when the enemy sees you before you can see them and has more advanced weaponry...
2:30 🔥 The best part of it is nothing but watching the action taken off the jet with the mixture of the soundtrack gives me the goose of hen. It's from where we recognize the real gamers of battlefield🔥👌🏿🦾
Oskdi9xlieuxhjausuduxifyhgckisusjs10988777hnnb
@@andirapark7457 ok
Got say, this still look awesome in 2016 and will be in 2017 very soon.
It's not just raw graphic processing power, but how Frostbite 2 handles reflection and occlusion and the environmental artist to take advantage of all that. Most assets in this scene were never used again in game. It's a hell of a tech-demo.
This is why SU-35 is the best 5:09
cobra
Unfortunately the cobra is a high G manuver that if done at combat speeds would cause the aircraft to fall apart.
@@theiceana7237 wtf
Cobra pugachev
Duuuuh
This is such a ridiculous clip, at this close range missiles don't have enough time to arm themselves. This is textbook dogfighting that's best done with cannons, yet all the Hornets do is launch AA missiles...
and the driver is awful.
It's a game, not a simulator so
I know it's a game, but I can't just suspend my 'issues'...it's my genetic defect. That said, I admit this was a solid part of BF3, it was entertaining, despite flaws like, Iranians not having Su-35s (not russians, this mission was a strike against Mehrabad airport in Tehran) so it's iranians the US planes are fighting against, not russians IRCC.
Oh well, it's like the other clip where M1 Abrams fight against Iranian T72s...they make it look like the T72s have a chance, when they don't.
and they didn't have a chance... so...
The suspension of disbelief is based on the difference between your culture and the programmers'/designers' and their reserch. For this reason it is easier for children/kid to "believe" in certain situations and have fun out of them. You have my same problem and unfortunately games with these kind of "errors" are unable to push me over the rainbow. I enjoy them to some extent, but guns, vehicles, history facts and even historical buildings are often wrong, and that is enough to burst my bubble.
"It's a game", yes, and behind it there are tens of millions of dollars and thousand of people who are not able to turn it into something more... something for someone who knows more than the average Joe. To each is own, I guess. :-(
10:56 I love this game. So realistic, having debris go flying right through your plane.
Im afraid you were talking about "attention to detail" not "realistic"
@@errornamenotfound2513 no
@@gvudrt8266 realistic means being/almost being 1 to 1 scale of the real life counter part. (Which almost none of them in the game)
Attention to detail means the quality/some stuffs of the game example of it is what you just said. The debris flying through your plane when you hit it with a missile
sarcasm detected
@@errornamenotfound2513 I'm pretty sure it was sarcasm.
SU35 losing to an f18 in a close dog fight? emmm yeah, I dont think so. I understand its a game but still...
ikr but still, it's a story about American winning a war.
Zach P to be honest it could actually happen all it would take is one of the pilots to make a mistake.
Zach P You're right, if they were looking for enemy planes to shoot at they wouldve used the f22. but then again, the f22 would end that fight in a couple seconds, not good for gameplay.
"how did we even win this battle?"
lol f22 stealth junk is so overrated
Why is the canopy all scratched up? The most important thing on a fighter jet or any plane for the matter is a clear view out the glass.
lol
To be serious, flying through the air isn't just, air. There's a lot of particulate in the air. Grains of dust, rock, carbon, ice - ect. When you flying on average of 600 MPH, you're going to get scratches. In reality, fighter craft have their canopies replaced every so often on a regular schedule. They're made of a Plexiglas that, not only get's scratch up, but get's weak over time thanks to the sun. Advanced fighter craft canopies use classified laminate materials that include things like gold and other metals for RAM (Radar Absorbent Material) effects to assist in low RCS / Stealth features. The F-22 replaces it's canopy after every 800 flight hours.
We don't replace canopies unless they're broken or outside tolerances for visibility ... they're $15,000 a pop for just the glass.
This is not a real simulator is it? More like Afterburner...
Keith Richards No, this is a mission on bf3. You don't even control the jet.
F18 taking Su35 down... joke of the century 😂😂😂
Battlefield 4
Yes Sukhoi su 35 easy kill f 18
They're actually Mig 29s
Machine cant kill anyone. It depends on pilot in it
With infinite missile and flare, I don't think it a joke. :))
Эх, помню как первый раз проходил эту игру. Был под большим впечатлением, особенно от этой миссии.
тоже понравилось ,а вот батлу 5 я уже прошёл вообще без интереса ради галочки как в принципе и батлу 1 не зацепило ,будем надеяться что новую часть сделают с современной войной
@@SantiagoPadonkus Батла всё. Закончилась.
I dont understand you cyka blyt. With that cheekie bleekie lingo.
@@dr.wompus9858 bro, relax. I just said I admired this game.
Парни,а как игра называется?
I remember first time I did this mission it gave me goosebumps I loved it so much!
Перекрутить на этом утюге су 35го, не в этой жизни ребята.
ну а если говорить о дистанции боя и как он взял фку за задницу , там бы сразу из пушки залп был и до свидания
Оооо...Патриотня на связи! Успокойся. Вступать с моделью 70х годов разработки ( Т-10С) в виражный бой....На сверзвуковых...Ахахахахахаха.... Собьют еще на взлете.
@@yakovlevskiy проверь, у тебя там сало не сгорело ?
Специально для Никиты Яковлевского, чтоб всё на место в голове встало:th-cam.com/video/bAkFQFwWuvU/w-d-xo.html
@@yakovlevskiy зайди глянь.
Even while playing I was skeptical as to how close are the two hornets during fly-by over the carrier group.
Destroyers firing cruise missiles as the jets are yet to clear the airspace?
And the dogfight? So up close with the enemy fighters?
Кажется они преодалевают систему ПВО образца 1942 года😂
Я всё ждал когда они начнут из пистолетов стрелять друг в друга, как во время первой мировой.))) Дебилы блять
в игре то все красиво. только откуда у него столько ракет? он по каждому самолету выпускал минимум 4 ракеты, а то и 6 и 8. а сбил около 10 самолетов.
при чем СУшки ни разу по нему не стреляли ракетами, а из пушки всегда мазали. хотя 30мм снаряд у наших пушек даже пролетев в 10 см от крыла своей энергией разорвет обшивку, а если попадет, то даже 1 снаряд и самолету конец. у них самолеты не бронированы как у нас. и у них 20 мм пушки, а у нас 30 мм. от наших нет шансов спастись.
ракеты наши ближнего боя в разы лучше. это они точно знают.
но больше смешно то, что су-35 так легко дал зайти себе в спину, будто сам подставлялся.
а когда сушки были сзади - они ни разу не стреляли ракетами. вобщем сказка.
@@makschelyaba3214 Может и сказка, это лишь игра.😁
А в реальности на расеюшке, чуть ли не каждый день падают самолёты.
@@makschelyaba3214 ты диванный идиот или отличить игру от реальности не можешь ? твоя сушка это летающее корыто.
@@alien6568 , ну да. когда самолеты летают - бывает что они и падают.
но это когда есть чему падать.
как и в любой другой стране падают точно так же , где есть чему летать.
это не про твою страну. где ничего не делают и ничего не летает.
Are you serious? You pass this off as an air combat simulator but this is clearly the fourth level of battlefield 3!
russian kangaroo productions read the description
russian kangaroo productions khlh
russian kangaroo productions ikr
Yeah bro this is from BF3
russian kangaroo productions hi guy can you subscribe for me I need more subscribers
5:08 - Pugachev's Cobra!
As part of my service in the AF, I learned that move from Tom Cruise (he is a licensed pilot!)
That's Battelfield 3 for you.. Played it thrice on PS3 still can't get over it.. Awesome gameplay right from on field combat to street shootings,tanks , Fighter jets.. perfect .. just perfect !
This game is Battlefield 3
Just the campaing
What is it's size bro
And this game run on laptop
@@gurjazzgaming6546 yes, check it on canurunit. Size 20 gb or so
I have the game but little lag because trash pc
@@gurjazzgaming6546 it does run on Laptop and its 30GB
Bf3 was a master piece, but I don't think that's the way hornets should be fighting Su 35s, but it's a FUCKING GOOD GAME
i dont think F18 can outmaneuver Su-35
su maneuver 10 times faster))))
Eugene Sith
So then it can do a full 360 in about 1 second? That would kill the pilot, destroy the bird, and cost millions...
FaKu_Zulu
I understood. You don`t know about su35
TH-cam you will see the aircraft.
Learn thrust vector control technology.
After this talk with you about the maneuverability su35.
Time reversal su35 - 36 degrees / sec.
But SU30, SU35, SU37..... have Supermaneuverability mode. You know whati is that?? NO? ))))
"Supermaneuverability" means the ability to maneuver the aircraft without restrictions on the angle of attack. US aircraft do not have this.
F18 - an ancient clumsy bucket.
This is a funny game. Fantastic.
Your faith the power of the US more and more calls our smile))))))
Maneuver aircraft without restrictions? So you mean s SU-35 can do 360 in 1 second? Without killing a pilot? About 40 or more G? How? What is life? LEAVE RUSSIAN BIASED KID.
I work aircrew, and for some odd reason I cant stop looking at the flight gloves LOL
5:07 when u r trying to outsmart your girlfriend but suddenly got to know that she's baiting on ur ass
The sound of the F18 jets are just beyond amazing
graphics are great, but not sure what this is... completely unrealistic.
Dan Shelton this is actually Battlefield 3
Dan Shelton battlefield 3
Dan Shelton Battlefield3
So thats the "reality in game"
Completely unrealistic?? How so? I was in the Navy attached to the USS Carl Vinson, and for a video game this is as realistic as it gets.
BS If you were in the navy you should know better...
This was my favorite mission. They did a really good job on it. Wish BF4's campaign was even close to as amazing
These two pilots should be called the Legend27 and the Legend28
Wow, I don't remember this mission in BF3. Gonna have to replay it, thanks.
It is still there
What is name of the game
it would be really cool with VR
bf3-..
Amen to that!
Is this available on PS 4?
Nikhil Kain Sadly nope
Pedro Henrique Moraes Silva Ace Combat 7 is VR compatible and coming to the PS4 in 2017.
Battlefield can still improve. When an AA missile is fired, it should no longer be see in your wings. In this case, several missiles were fired from the Super Hornet, however, none of them was removed from the pylons. Also, the other player from another airframe should be able to visually see that its colleague is running out of missiles. Hope to see such improvements in the software logic.
There's so much wrong with this I don't even know where to start (and I really don't know if I should)
Air force has all the aircraft carriers
No it doesn't.
Who told you that story tale??
I'm an Airman, and we never launched on a fucking carrier..
FYI, the biggest fleet it's owned by the Air Force, the 2nd biggest fleet it's owned by the Navy..
These fighters are launched by a big ass boat "A.K.A" Aircraft Carrier. Those are navy pilots man. lol
*****
it even says navy on the jets
That's what I'm saying..
My goodness, I'm a fan of video games as well.. But a little bit of common sense and some Google research doesn't hurt 😂
BTW.. I used to play Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X
Зайчик навалял волку. Отличное забавное видео :)
Su 35 will out manuver that F18 all day
El_gwappo7 you wish.
El_gwappo7 hell no
This is just a game. Su35 is too strong for the the F18. You can even see how the game level is lowered at 5:10 when the Su 35 makes the cobra maneuver, it could easily shoot the F18 and keep its lock as long as it wished, but since this is just a game, it didn't. Notice that the radius of curvature when the Su 35 turns is much lower than the F18 (because of the 3D thrust vectorial capabilities of its two boosters), that's why the Su 35 is far more maneuverable than the F18 and in reality, much much tough (any pilot will agree)
Julien Cirhuza Kacuka but now there gonna use the f-35 and still the f 35 is better so the su 35 is still trash
El_gwappo7 everyday
Who's entering the plane and preforming pre-flight checks while the plane is already connected the catapult?
Itrolller1234 the pilot
Jose Disla That's more a question like: How can you be so stupid to do that?
(Yes I know it's only a game)
Itrolller1234 dnt make stupid questions then (yes i know is a game)
Jose Disla what's so stupid about my question?
Itrolller1234 I agree
One of my favorite missions in the BF series.
i cant believe this game is almost 9 years old
What is its name
@@amreloqaly4537 battlefield 3
The Su 35 would cream any plane flying today
Ron Wylie how do you know
it would not
SU-35 was an amazing machine but come on!
the F-22 would cream it 100/100.
craig harris agreed
5:08 nice Pugachev's Cobra maneuver....
Having in mind that in the real life scenario the things would've been pretty different. like dogfights on History.
jup the SU 35 would of been scrap metal even before they would spot the f18
Martin Hendry Um... no!
Um... Yes? SU 35 is a close encounterment aircraft. F-18 Is a long distant support modeled aircraft meant to spot and engage from a distance, as SU 35 is able to maneuver and have better maneuverment in low speed dog fight scenarios.
eeerm, no... Su-35 is a mulltirole fighter with perfect LRAAM load and with a longer range then F-18
depends on the f-18's armament, the Super Hornets are superior
Tom Cruise is flying at @ 5:10 🔥💪🏾💯
I would be interesting if this famous maneuver is really called after him or Maverick ...
Pugachev Cobra Maneuver!!! 5:07 that F18 should be dead seconds after!
This is the best part of battlefield 3
Su-35 blasted by a F-18, okay, it's a video game but still...
No wonder if all they are using is outdated heat seekers that don't lock on targets behind the craft.
мечтать не вредно, вредно не мечтать
Try DCS next time?
Firing up DCS. Lifting off .... I see no enemy .. boom dead. Lifting off again ... i ... boom. Crap game. I am supposed to see them all the time, and hit them all the time, I am also supposed to be able to take any amount of canon fire without any systems damage cause my aircraft have this or that many hit points FFS .. it does have hitpoints right?????
MajSolo I know right? I fired off BMS went to the plane on hanger. pressed 'E' engine won't even start!!! Like nothing I pressed managed to even start the engine I tried all the keys and joystick buttons. Proceed to load myself in taxiway. Radar doesn't work. like WTF? So loaded myself in the air, get warning about enemy and radar doesn't autolock!! like what joke is this? I can't even see them and then everything in my cockpit starts flashing and beeping and I am dead. Completely unrealistic.
you do know its the most realistic sim right ?
its a simulator ffs not your average battlefield game where u just hop into the jet and start blowing up stuff. most of the people who're good at flying in battlefield will never be as close to good in dcs as they are in battlefield.
Arcade games are more fun for some people. That's not bad, that's just a style. But Battlefield 3 is not a simulator.
Now if you want to improve your skills, airplane simulator are just better. The learning curve is super high yes. But it's more rewarding. The combats are more intense because you can be killed easily and your airplane is bond to the laws of aerodynamics. For example, you can't do a stupid infinite U-Turn in a simulator. This (real) limit create a tension the closer you get to it.
and most importantly, there was no need for expensive hardware for such a picture, it worked on 2 cores and gigabyte video, study as scammers
The cobra maneuver is amazing
The breathing when turning to prevent glock is so real
Has anyone noticed the thumbnail is from a completely different game then the game he is playing? (Battlefield 3)
Me!
No shit
which game?
5:09 even game developers knew how awesome Su-35's maneuver is.....
how many fox one missiles did that f18 have? 😂
30
yes
fox-2 actually
Nice video very nice good lock my friend Eagle 🇺🇲♥️❤️
I'm American all the way, America has some stunning aircraft, the B2, F-15, F/A-18s and so does Russia, with their absolutely beautiful sukhois and migs, but let's face the facts, the likely hood of an F/A-18 out maneuvering a suhkoi? That's very unlikely, but it's a American video game so of course they will, but realistically, I doubt it
Which game is this?
@@ManjeetSingh-uj3cm battlefield 3
NapalmTaylor д you’re ignoring a dozen other factors- targeting systems, EW radars, flight tactics, weapon capabilities, pilot training... air to air warfare isn’t like a movie. It’s not Top Gun. A section of F/A-18s launched directly off a carrier group has a massive advantage, before they’re even in the air
Too much missiles he fired. An airfighter doesn't has so many. And also it is impossible to shoot down a fighter with the gun like in this game.
Winning or losing it depends upon the pilot 👨✈️
ф 18 увернулся в маневренном бою от су 35)))))) и сел ему на хвост. Ну ну сказочники...
th-cam.com/video/JdHAOsyx81o/w-d-xo.html
Да пусть тешаться , чем больше заблуждений, тем лучше!
Блять, Война в ИСПАНИИ!!! в середине 30ых годов показало то, что МАНЕВРЕННЫЙ БОЙ - ХУЙНЯ !
А в электронике и в ракетостроении США нас уделывает как Тузик грелку.
Давай , напиши мне с Айфона, или с Виндовса, что это не так...
Сергей Скрим
Миги , не су 35 )
F-18 with Russian Instrument, amazing
the enemies seem like a bunch of kindergarden kid who can't even play games well.
kind of true but when you start the campaign in BF3 it asks you how do you want it means ( Easy, Medium, Hard) if you choose hard than the enemy wont be kindergarden kids
@@umara.r3878 They'll be kindergarden kids, cuz its just a videogame
🤣🤣🤣
Should have kept the dialog between the two lieutenants before walking up the deck
This is my favorite and the best mission in BF3
Tyler Allen waht the name of this game?
lol Battlefield 3 must have been wierd for a Russian player
Yeah I saw some comment saying American dreams and then some American said it’s not a dream and other Russians said shut up we will obliterate your country
Спустя 7-8 лет назад прохождения этой игры я её увидел на ютубе)
at a very specific angle, the f18 looks like a f15 eagle....
this game not air combat fighter but this game battleflied 3
Neng Yuyun ace combat Sky of déception
Halo neng yuyun :v indo ya
@@justsoldier123 nope, this is Battlefield 3, it's got nothing to do with Ace Combat
@@aprianriadi5930 are indonesian people1😑
Tauan aja wk..
да, ну ,ладно этот игрок после кобры Су 35 был бы в ангаре уже
Как игра называется?
@@mtrix9856 батлфилд 3
Вообще то в момент кобры су35 легкая мишень. Если бы игрок полностью управлял своим самолетом ему ничто не мешало сбить его в тот момент
@@cyborg7779 где проходил обучение? На чем летал? Какой налёт?
@@cyborg7779 Я бы посмотрел на тебя если бы в жизни перед тобой истребитель сделал бы "кобру", я сомневаюсь что ты начал бы стрелять по нему )
Lol After watching for long I feel like I was playing moving ma phone left and right 😄 :)
only one word... it's so cool....
it's ?
how can i undo my view of this video
in the console open it with ^ and then type the command for no huds
wow
I loved this mission. BF3 is one of the best campaign FPS I ever played.
Stephen McAllister I think it is BF4
nope its BF3
Luirs Ada your telling me it's 4 when i have 3 and played this mission lol
most likely the last good solo campaign you'll ever play BF series is turning into a dump of a game.
Man I love Bf3 on everything, except the campaign. But I have to agree that this mission is the best one
Американцы все бои выигрывают в анимированной реальности!
A right turn off the waist cat....ARE YOU INSANE?
not insane, just dumb.
kayakutah
On top of that the enemy was apparently 8 miles from the fleet..which might I add had anothet carrier directly behind the Bush (the one Shark flight comes from). Have fun launching birds off that carrier.
I have it kind of skipped over it ' but after seeing this ' going back from bf3 to go over it again , that is one good mission .
BF3 not BF4
OH sorry , that's what I meant to say ' thanks '
5:08 that Pugachev's Cobra, mostly only russian jets can do it.
It means Japanese sword
Chinese fighter jets can.do that too
It’s stunning no doubt, barely an once of realism in this entire mission though. Even the language sounds like Hollywood wrote it
You a fighter pilot?
@@bert3064 I don’t have to be a fighter pilot to know something is unrealistic. Let’s break it down, you don’t discuss classified missions in the hallways, there are specific rooms where classified information can be discussed.
The hud is wrong for the super Hornet, the pre flight checks are wrong (not my words, the words of an actual hornet pilot)
Pilot is the shooter, WSO is more for A/G missions, using the targeting pod and what not
PowerOfThePick nice
yer its almost like its not real and its just a game made for entertainement purposes
An F/A-18 won again'st a Su-35 on a DF. Definitely unrealistic
How the hell did a f-18 (or f-16) shoot down a Su-35????
just as PAKISTAN airforce' s F16 shot down Indian su -30. google it
@@T.2.T nah, not in the dogfight
@@T.2.T wow, fake propaganda by citizen of a zero credible nation. I want to tell everyone, according to Pakistani people and their fake propaganda spreaded by themselves on internet that they still believe 'M.M alam' was the best fighter pilot and no other nation's pilots was near him but in reality many articles and the list of top 10 fighter pilots were published by the authentic news source and they never mentioned the name any Pakistani pilot. every best fighter pilots were from germany, Russia, U.k, italy and U.S.
@@T.2.T indian airforce has already released the radar images of that incident publicly.. did your airforce publish anything to prove their claims,
World's best game i think "Battlefield 3"
Despite what the title states, the US Air Force does not utilize the F/A18. The Super Hornet is flown by the US Marines and US Navy. I doubt that there are many Air Force jocks that are carrier qualified.
If they are, they are helicopter or Osprey pilots only.
IamTenzin not even then the only navy and marine helicopters and ospreys land on carriers unless an absolute emergency has taken place.
michael smith You may wish to speak to the 160th about that.
Seriously......we are talking about catapult launched high performance jets, not helios. Yes, the Army's 160th SOAR regiment are qualified to operate from Wasp Class assault ships like like the USS Battan or USS Kearsarge but again these are rotary wing and VTOL platforms, not Nimitz Class carriers such as the Reagan or Stennis.
None of them are... but they are better at landing in a crosswind though. All inter-service teasing aside though, this was the dumbest dogfight mission in any video game ever made. And yes, the title of this video is completely nonsensical.
В реальном бою, 16й ещё на авианосце сгорел, от страха, когда 35ка мимо пролетала😆
ага ага, рисея рисея👍👍
The canopy glass would never be scratched up like that. ever.
that's icing, not scratches. You have to have flown one to know that.
looks a lot like a badger was trying to claw its way out, but ok.
wlj11 that icing was on even before takeoff?
Sure, they keep 'em nice and tight so that they get covered by at least 1 meter of snow and ice. Improves the flying capabilities of the machine... Also it's perfectly normal to have it covered with ice when it's raining outside. LOL
ahh right, my obvious lack of flying experience shows. lol
Graphics are awesome!
So if Su-35 couldn't lock on, then why didn't it just use its 30mm gun?
Вроде игра, но переживал за открученную гайку в кабине. ))
Гайки у них тоже как сувениры скручивают 🤪
2 гайки
The Sukhoi is really terrifying, sir
No terrifying Sukhoi from a Great Fighter Pilot! LOL!
would be cool if this was not just a single player mission where you had no control of the plane.
The USAF doesn't fly the FA-18, Only the USMC and the Navy..
Raven Leader and nasa :)
Raven Leader They're taking off from a carrier. I believe they're supposed to be playing the Navy in this mission
Harry - Shhh, this is TH-cam, logic and common sense is not allowed.How dare you come up with a rational thought process around here!
@@oz_medias finally, someone with common sense
Like this he can conquer the whole world.... They made it a cup of tea.. Good kill...only one fighter paralyzed the whole Air force... No anti aircraft guns install on ground... Anyway good efforts
This in the oculus would be nutss
It's battlefield. Never will be in oculus
Wrong .... It can be modded for the oculus on pc.
they can remaster it, everything possible
hhahaahaahh US fantasy
Honestly, its all about the skill of the pilot between such planes.
Elites Engineering agreed and US has a lot of experienced pilots
HARDEN HARD So does Russia, and Canada, and other countries.
true Jimy! keep dreaming guys
It really is about skills and tactics. Amazing planes on both sides
Надо было против кукурузников поставить ф18, было бы куда реальнее)) против су35 шансов практически нет)
Здесь Правда их нет вообще, f 18 неспособен кокнкурировать даже с су 27
Я не патриот мне пофигу на Россию и на всё остольное и не называй F 18 говном ты хотябы похуже создай
А ты откуда знаешь, самый умный чтоли здесь?
@@Navaga52 Ты поплачь ещё из за того что F18 гавно! Лучше мамке пожалуйся!
okay, 5:10 hawkin start to turn his head 360°... i don't know how he look in the bandit cockpit cam...lol now i know the fact why su35 defeated by f18... U.S.af bringing they creepy ghost to defeating anything...😂😂😂
😂😂 lol that's true. Turning the head as if from a scene of the Exorcist
It looks great but is unrealistic in many ways. You'd NEVER have two carriers working so close together. The timing, scale, and speeds of air combat are all wrong. And any fighter to fighter combat engagement will start well beyond visual range. You'll never see your opponent with the naked eye until he's on fire and heading straight down. Or you screwed up really, REALLY badly.
so what? I played DCS, real combat simulation is really hard and i guess real life is even harder. it took me hours to learn the system on that sim game until i could engage a target. unless you're a hardcore air sim fan, you don't want that kind of realism which is both hard to learn and hard to master.
Судя по уровню шизофазии, сценарий писал сам том Кленси
мечтать не вредно,все они хотят победить....далеки они от нас))
Да Далеки на лет 50 опережают
Что за игра русские объясните
@@МаксимШелковников-г6в Батлфилд 3
Нет, сценарий написан самим Мак Кейном!!!
people saying this is unrealistic well I hate to break it to ya it's a game
2:40中央右のおっさん「にしおかすみこだよ」ってムチ振り下ろしてるみたい