Thank you very much for this explanation, Sir! Contrary to your concluding remark, I actually found this video really easy to understand, even easier than geopotential for some odd reason.
oh this is great i was finding chapter 2 of An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology very challenging but this video just made it so easy for me! now i understand the whole thing. thank you so much!
Thank you and it makes me happy to hear that the video helped you out. As I said in some of my videos (not sure which one though), the main purpose of these videos is not to replace a book, but to serve as supporting material for books and other learning material (e.g, actual university lectures, documentaries, etc.). Just as you used it...
@@DjordjeRomanic youre welcome. can you please explain section '2.3 Component equations in spherical coordinates' from the book 'An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology' too??
Wow, I understand everything! I just have two questions out of curiosity. 1) If we apply the reasoning in the southern hemisphere where the rotation is clockwise, the reasoning remains the same (except for the omega sign and orientation of k), is that correct? 2) Also, how do we deal with problems involving non-inertial reference frames with crazy motions? Can they only be solved with numerical approach?
1) You are correct. 2) Yes, the problem can get very complicated. See my video on Apparent (Fictitious) Forces where I derive the apparent forces (centrifugal force, Coriolis force, and Euler force). When one considers the Earth, the Euler force is not important.
I would hope that the side view and my narration helps to clarify this derivation. In the side view, di "goes into the Earth" (again, when observed from the side view) and it has j and k components. If my explanation is still confusing, I suggest you also read this chapter in the book "An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology" by Holton.
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you very much for this explanation, Sir! Contrary to your concluding remark, I actually found this video really easy to understand, even easier than geopotential for some odd reason.
Amazing explanation, Hats off !
Thank you for your kind words.
oh this is great i was finding chapter 2 of An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology very challenging but this video just made it so easy for me! now i understand the whole thing. thank you so much!
Thank you and it makes me happy to hear that the video helped you out. As I said in some of my videos (not sure which one though), the main purpose of these videos is not to replace a book, but to serve as supporting material for books and other learning material (e.g, actual university lectures, documentaries, etc.). Just as you used it...
@@DjordjeRomanic youre welcome. can you please explain section '2.3 Component equations in spherical coordinates' from the book 'An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology' too??
@@lefty_lui I will cover that topic too at some point, but not in the next set of videos.
So satisfying 🔥🔥🔥
Thank you sir this is helping me a lot
Glad to hear that.
Wow, I understand everything! I just have two questions out of curiosity.
1) If we apply the reasoning in the southern hemisphere where the rotation is clockwise, the reasoning remains the same (except for the omega sign and orientation of k), is that correct?
2) Also, how do we deal with problems involving non-inertial reference frames with crazy motions? Can they only be solved with numerical approach?
1) You are correct.
2) Yes, the problem can get very complicated. See my video on Apparent (Fictitious) Forces where I derive the apparent forces (centrifugal force, Coriolis force, and Euler force). When one considers the Earth, the Euler force is not important.
I'm confused at the part where you wrote di in terms of j and k. How you had resolved it into j and k I'm confused
I would hope that the side view and my narration helps to clarify this derivation. In the side view, di "goes into the Earth" (again, when observed from the side view) and it has j and k components. If my explanation is still confusing, I suggest you also read this chapter in the book "An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology" by Holton.
Yes got it. Thank you sir