ความคิดเห็น •

  • @zoominmicroscopy
    @zoominmicroscopy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is an amazing and thorough answer to the viewer's question. I'm impressed!

  • @superlinux
    @superlinux 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It appears that in microscopy i cannot trust anyone but you. I bought the AmScope T120 based on your recommendations. Now i also thinking of getting the stereo microscope that is on your right hand. Bless you and may Allah keep your way safe and sound. Thanks a lot.

  • @larryneubecker3053
    @larryneubecker3053 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I always appreciate it, when and others with microscopes, you tell us what power you are looking at something with. That helps me. Thanks!

  • @Mick_Holland
    @Mick_Holland 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Super video. “Every microscope is a compromise”. Never a truer word spoken! 🙂 Cheers 👍🏼

  • @rezzer7918
    @rezzer7918 ปีที่แล้ว

    A veritable treasure trove of knowledge advice experience & info on microscopes

  • @Skauber
    @Skauber 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    11:20 For proper camera mount, search for "c mount adapter" or similar. These are often used in stereo microscopes in soldering applications, and I dont see any reason why it wouldnt work for any stereo microscope.

    • @PPMOCRG
      @PPMOCRG 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that you’re right, it should work.

  • @lj.3589
    @lj.3589 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos. Thank you. Just an FYI, the person who wrote you wasn't actually confused about stereo vs compound microscopes. The person was being polite in bringing up the recommended Swift SW380T because that person couldn't understand why you'd recommend a compound microscope instead of a stereo microscope. (I was wondering the same thing on the last video of yours that I watched about stereo microscopes and once again the SW380T compound microscope was recommended in the notes--as it is in this video's notes.) The person is essentially humbly stating that there may be something he/she doesn't know, but overall the person is hoping for a stereo microscope recommendation. RESTATED: The writer's words: "...what confuses me was whether this microscope was a stereo microscope and if that's important to carry out detailed observations?" essentially translates to "I couldn't understand why you were recommending a compound microscope instead of a stereo microscope but perhaps there's something important that I don't know about compound microscopes that would make them useful in a way I haven't thought of for my purpose."

  • @boris2342
    @boris2342 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Having a mid-life crisis ... need expensive hobby... want both

  • @joeyhinds6216
    @joeyhinds6216 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also look at tracing tables for illumination from below

  • @faustsmith
    @faustsmith 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you post a video cleaning flux fumes off the internal optics of both zoom objectives of the SZM series of microscopes used in the electronics repair industry please? Yes, this kind of microscope shown in this video. Thank you Sir

  • @akosszilagyi4504
    @akosszilagyi4504 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you make a video on how to do focus stacking?

  • @kryten4k
    @kryten4k 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why don't microscopes I've seen use both the eye pieces then software that can put together images that are 3D? The camera goes into the single channel then uses stacking software to process but one take from each eyepiece could cut out a lot of work. We have stereo cameras also for this reason I think but would be a good improvement in microscopes because you could see high detail in stereoscope. I know, stupid question I realise but would be interesting to see if this is possible as 3D vision is pretty popular at the moment.

    • @zumwild
      @zumwild 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it is easy to do. Just use 2 inexpensive digital cameras or even two phones. I have used 2 film cameras to make old Viewmaster sterio images. I messed a few up with wrong angles etc, but the human eye is amazing at image processing and generating a sterio image.

  • @fpixel7190
    @fpixel7190 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, I'm an avid rockhound collecting gems and precious metals and was wondering what advantages are there to having a stereo microscope over a 50x magnification jewelers loupe? I'm needing to analyze crystal structures of minerals that are opaque and will likely need more magnification. Would I be better off going with a compound microscope and somehow thinly slice the ore? Thanks for all this excellent information!

    • @MicrobehunterMicroscopy
      @MicrobehunterMicroscopy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      While I have personally not used the loupe before, I can imagine that it is more convenient to use both eyes. You get a stereoscopic image. You can also use polarizing filters. For long-term use microscopes are more comfortable, I guess. Compound microscopes would require that the mineral is polished thinly and this is a bit of a science. You have to use fine sandpaper to sand down the mineral to a very thin slice.Cutting probably won't work because the mineral is too hard and brittle. Geologists and petrographers use polarizing microscopes. for this.

  • @raiderayrtoncastropino1722
    @raiderayrtoncastropino1722 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelent information. A lot of thanks.

  • @antonievanleeuwenhoek5772
    @antonievanleeuwenhoek5772 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir can u make videos on stain .
    And how does it work 👨‍🔬👨‍🔬

  • @davidmelhuish232
    @davidmelhuish232 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative video, thanks.

  • @a2roland
    @a2roland 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent help!... Thank You!

  • @tuhkathri9126
    @tuhkathri9126 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't understand why stereo microscopes aren't called stereo macroscopes. Especially since they seem to focus on objects bigger than microscopic level.. Also, I was looking at the Olympus SZX16 and it says it can do both macroscopy and microscopy and even things like dark field at 230x magnification. So is there a reason to get a specific compound microscope?

  • @MichaelPontif
    @MichaelPontif 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @ewankirkpatrickcom
    @ewankirkpatrickcom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi! How do you recommend going about learning the basics of how to use a compound microscope? I have the Amscope M150c and am struggling with doing the basic stuff. Thanks!

    • @MicrobehunterMicroscopy
      @MicrobehunterMicroscopy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hello, I will do a video on the very basics. Maybe in 1 or 2 days it's ready and I will put it online in this channel.

    • @ewankirkpatrickcom
      @ewankirkpatrickcom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Microbehunter Microscopy thank you very much! I cant wait to see it.

  • @flugschulerfluglehrer
    @flugschulerfluglehrer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Du könntest einen Helicoid Adapter an den Phototubus schrauben. Mit dem läßt sich entsprechend genau fokussieren.

  • @dragonfire4529
    @dragonfire4529 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amscope simul focal is best option for her

  • @larryseibold4287
    @larryseibold4287 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you have a recommendation for a good introductory stereo microscope? Isn't AmScope just marking up the Chinese models after import? They have a lot of models. I see the SE400-Z on the low end (but seems very functional), and others like SM-4TX-144A with more features at ~3x the price. I think the objective lens can be changed on the low cost unit, but i don't think you can add/change the Barlow Lenses. How important is that likely to be?

  • @lieferic9
    @lieferic9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't achieve stereoscopic vision til the age of 50 so the whole world at any magnification is an art museum!

  • @cantthinkofnameyeah7249
    @cantthinkofnameyeah7249 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whats the maxium practical stereo microscope magnification compared to the 1000x on Compound Microscopes?

  • @alinsoar
    @alinsoar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stereo are good for soldering SMDs.

  • @davecooke914
    @davecooke914 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi looking to buy microscope I keep koi need one to pick up fish parasites can you which would be suitable

  • @SneekySecrets
    @SneekySecrets 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Microbhunter, I have an urgent need to identify a microb. How might I send a photo of what I captured w/my microscope? Tiny particles all over my apt and hope to identify to know how to test.

    • @MicrobehunterMicroscopy
      @MicrobehunterMicroscopy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Microbe identification can be complex. Bacterial identification using a microscope is not possible. And the tiny particles can be pretty much anything from dust to skin, to anything. I do have an email address and you can send me a picture. check the about page of this channel.

    • @SneekySecrets
      @SneekySecrets 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MicrobehunterMicroscopy thank you

  • @anirbandash4938
    @anirbandash4938 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is an electron microscope?? plz make a video on it-

    • @MicrobehunterMicroscopy
      @MicrobehunterMicroscopy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sorry, I can not! I do not have an electron microscope. Electron microscopes use electrons instead of light. They are able to magnify much more, but have the disadvantage that they do not have color and that it is not possible to see living and moving cells (they are dead). It also takes a long time to prepare a sample.

  • @abdullahnezar2801
    @abdullahnezar2801 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the model of the amscope zoom stereo microscope?

  • @lotharmayring6063
    @lotharmayring6063 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    a photografer normally does not need any stereo stuff because his picture is not 3-dimensional and his
    camera only uses one ocular. Thou the question is nonsense. The difference lies in the techics illumindating his objects.

  • @ajcann
    @ajcann 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your questioner might be interested in this recent video: th-cam.com/video/Ioj4IwEfW3A/w-d-xo.html

  • @ms.scienceandreasonlover
    @ms.scienceandreasonlover 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah stereo microscopes are great

  • @stevereed8786
    @stevereed8786 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you message me the China web side, it sounds like your saying ID Express.com.

  • @dragonfire4529
    @dragonfire4529 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Eakins simul focal ia nothing compares to amscope the cheaper microscope are made of plastic and cheap parts less life time spen and low quality

  • @senanlane6882
    @senanlane6882 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I definitely perfer compound microscopes no offence

    • @MicrobehunterMicroscopy
      @MicrobehunterMicroscopy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Get both! :-)

    • @senanlane6882
      @senanlane6882 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MicrobehunterMicroscopy I would love to but they can cost 200€ upwards

  • @twistymail
    @twistymail 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was disappointed in the video. You are obviously eager to explain and genuine as hell but you slide over the nitty gritty of actually finding and buying a microscope. You don't put yourself in our position as buyers. Why don't you explore how to buy "the same" scope directly from China. Ebay and Amazon offer a surprisingly limited amount of information about the scopes they list. Comparison is very difficult. They offer no information as to what kind of attachments can be accommodated. Ringlights? Different eyepieces? Could you clarify better or not? And what keeps bothering me is why I need to purchase a new camera (especially a low resolution 3 megapixel camera) when I already own a much better camera and I also have a smartphone camera. Aren't there modifying connectors for attaching other cameras? What is the "camera" that comes with these scopes anyway? Are they really cameras or just screens to record the image and send it off to a computer? Do they take pictures like cameras or is that up to your computer as a screenshot? You are passing over a lot of basic information.