Must What?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ก.ย. 2024
- Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
How I win my first 4-digit ELO game:
• The WORST Drawback
🎵 Music used in this video:
Xomu - Last Dance:
• Xomu - Last Dance
#chess #ChessBut #drawback
Accidental drawback abuse from the first opponent, very rare.
69th like, very rare.
@@maze7050 Technically only happens once per comment at most
From my experience it's very rare for your opponent to not abuse your drawback if revealed
@@jeremyready8030 That why I never reveal
Jesus that last sequence was brutal 😆
C4 is technically a bomb, not a volcano
I think the "active volcano" might be randomised, it just happened to be C4 in Simp's game lol
You didn't hear about the automated bomb factory in the caldera? It went nuts and started spewing live munitions all around. Same difference, really
fire comment
Now the question is WHO THE HELL DROPPED A BOMB INTO A VOLCANO?!
The drawbacks on this website absolutely are not balanced around being revealed.
They're also not necessarily balanced based on the scaling system itself
Its cuz simps elo is high
true testosterone
It's almost as if you weren't supposed to reveal them!
and he only play on this website by revealing his drawback
Wow that last game was clean
The real comedy of it is that both challenges were ranked as very easy, while if revealed become about the most difficult you can have (evidenced by simp noting the inability to defeat an opponent who can get king to safety and also making each of his opponents moves forced)
*Love how in the third game he was able to use indormation he learned during the first game*
I love indormation!!!!
He didn't learn it in the first game. The ruling that the king has higher value than the queen has been known for many videos
Its probably specifically to avoid stalemates(or auto lose most likely) in drawbacks like the first game where if he lost his queen and then the opponent moved their queen he'd have no moves if the queen was the highest value.
@@Capzielath64-- Specifically allowing kings in check to count for any movement drawback might work, or changing their value when in check. (A king in check is worth two in the castle).
I hope I'm not the only one who noticed that the decision to value the king as the most valuable piece cost Simp the first game, but gave him a free win in the third one.
I couldn't figure out what simp was doing at first in that last game but that was actually genius.
I love how the king being considered the highest value killed your first game, but saved your last.
The first game is basically a repeat of "How to FLEX in chess" from 5 days ago
Looks like viewer copied from here.
@@choco1101 or the viewer could also have a similar idea with whoever made the drawbacks
Though with the difference that the king is worth more than the queen, which makes a HUGE difference in gameplay.
Also, the second game is an exact repeat of "You Need Good Computer For Chess" from three months ago.
1:50 The opponent could have moved only his king and taken all of Simp's pieces, while Simp would only have been able to shuffle his king back and forth.
he could have taken the king with the king xD
That second game was scary. If he dared to take your pawn with the knight and put your king in check, you would've lost had it given you any square that didn't allow you to move your king or queen
That knight would not have been able to move to the king side to capture the king, due to his opponent's drawback though. But of course, Chess Simp did not know that.
Even if the knight got captured it would still be fine because I think the strategy there was to force the Queen out to maximize the number of random moves Simp was forced to make. Working around that drawback would still suck, tho
The third game was cyber bullying
"Do not attribute to genius what you can to pure chance." --Some GM (Probably)
Wow just as i was wondering where today's video was
The last guy just wanted you to feel better about the first match
I love my beloved drawback chess.
08:19 easy drawback in the last game??
It's easy if you don't reveal
@@a.lollipop yes, yes... I know that. What I am wondering is why does he get an easy drawback at 2000+ ELO
@@dartadeqso because the opponent is very close to him in elo probably
@@dartadeqso ah, well i dont think the difficulty of the drawbacks is affected by elo, it seems to be very random
@@a.lollipop 00:20
Simp casually predicting the future with pawn e3 right before it became mandatory.
0:25 that one episode of thus spoke kishibe rohan
imagine if the first guy castled right into your queen
This was a beautiful video. The king being higher value than the queen was the theme; it screwed you in the first game, and saved you in the last.
I feel like the structure of these three games would be a great outline for an action movie.
Man that last game was unfair for your opponent. And it shows "easy". Sure buddy
The difficulty rating is not based on the drawback being revealed. You can play a pretty much normal game of chess with that restriction, so it's not very hard if the opponent doesn't know about it.
Simp said it numerous times - you should never reveal the drawback to your opponent, because it makes even the easiest drawbacks almost impossible.
@@Drakojana then why is he revealing his drawback every game?
@@3141minecraftTestosterone
@@3141minecraft You must be new to the channel
chess but you chose a piece or pawn after move 4, from move 5 on you are only allowed to move that piece or pawn if it is attacked and you can only move the king if it is not. you can move the chosen piece or pawn freely only when the opponent has equal or less points than you on the board
First opponent seemed to not abuse your Drawback
That checkmate came out of nowhere in the second game. I was so focused on how much material the random rolls were costing you that I completely missed the mate.
That third game was brilliant
Hedonic treadmill is an example of a drawback made almost impossible by the need to actually capture your opponents king. If you checkmate the opponent and they take the checkmating piece with their king, you cant take back. You can essentially only capture their king with yours, which is stupid. They should at least count the king as 3.5 for that drawback
That third game made me say „oh my god.“
You must move, king
The dev really should nerf that last drawback.
8:23 even without the king being more valuable you could win by protecting with the bishop.
1:43 is the king more valuable than the queen?!
Yes
6:15 Gambler's Fallacy
That first game you had can be summed up in one word.
Ooooffff
Shameless. Brutal. Moisturized.
Every “Good Noon, Everyone”, I have to double take
You had the same 100 rated challenge as the first drawback 4-5 days ago
That last game was very powerful
lol Damn. That last sequence was so brutal.
7:45 "lesser" lol
The first drawback was the same as a recent video, nice^^
Except that the king has more material value as a queen somehow
I feel like Simp just did Hedonic Treadmill as a viewer challenge just a few days ago, I hope the discord isn't stealing ideas from Drawback Chess.
First game blinded checkmate by back rank with queen just prior to the king moves
You are very lucky that you haven't lost this speedrun yet
Day 3 of asking Chess Simp not to start a "Xiangqi Simp" channel
Simp: Absolutely crushed the first drawback in a video 5 days ago.
Also Simp when he gets the same challenge: "Absolutely Impossible"
Edit: Also, that last game was fucking smooth.
That's what a difference revealing the drawback makes. XD
@@maxastro Nah, it's the difference between playing 100 elo and playing non 100 elo. I bet he can reveal that challenge is to his 100-elo opponents and it wouldn't make a difference; they probably wouldn't understand what the drawback even means.
Are you secretly Magnus Carlsen?
So the first opponents drawback was basically an instant death to using the Queen as an ICBM on the pawn in front of the king?
I feel like its dumb to reveal the drawback lol
I mean, I saw that the first game was already lost, because Qf1+ was also winning, but moving the king is even more of a chad move (even if it is accidental) and it's more safe since the drawback might have made him lose if Simp decided to take that pawn after the queen move.
math is mathing
2/3 = 100% Win Rate
I think you could deal with the second drawback by keeping a closed position. Trade your bishops out.
But you won anyway, so I guess everything worked out in the end
First one was 😮
Complaint about testosterone
“porn move”
You mean good morning!
LOL! Neither drawback at the end is an easy one, esp not if you both reveal
you should also lose elo if lose a game
2:39 isn't Qf1 mate here?
It is, but we didn't know that until after the game ended. Normally that would just be giving away the queen. Which would still have forced Simp to move his King, breaking up any other Botez gambit situation.
@@rzim0dnar why couldn't you know till after the game?
1:39 the King's not worth 3.5?
Imagine losing to a lucky noob, lol!
2:38 I like how you don't mention that you threw the game with that move because a queen move to the back rank would win for black
edit: oh... or this way I guess..
I mean, didnt you blunder your king at #2:40 ? All your opponent has to do is move queen to the a file. Sure, you can do a queen desperado, but king move forces king move
I understand revealing the drawback at the beginning against noobs, but at what elo will this stop?
This value sistem Need a patch
First game, this drawback was in 100 elo chess series recently. Really viewer, not so original...
7:24 there is 1 thing you can do: Not revealing your drawback
You get that that's not the point, right
Low testosterone statement
33 minutes
Bro what 🤯🤯🤯 1 minute ago!!!
1:43 you have moved your king which has 3.5 value. Opponents queen has higher value. You failed miserably!
On that website king > queen, so he didn't fail
@@tugabooga thanks for clarification, I pity myself
lmao
First one was 😮