This troubled me deeply when I was a teenager. I can use my intuition to deduce that I'm not a brain in a vat. But why can I trust my intuition? It seemed like circular reasoning, and I became terrified that the rational probability of my intuition and sensory information being reliable was therefore 50%. Now I don't think this, I think that raw intuition is infallible. But it terrified me horribly for a while.
@@Seasonal-Shadow_4674 The whole point is that you can't prove it lol. To be fair, does it really matter? Either your brain is in a vat, or it's in a human body. To you, both scenario's are 'real' anyway. Whether the first or the second is true doesn't really change anything, to you both experiences are 'real'. In my opinion there is no real meaning to life anyway, we're just here for a good time and then we die. So just try to enjoy the ride. Hope it helps.
If you/me/us were in a simulation/illusion and the creators don't want you/me/us know why would they even let me/you/us have the idea in the first place?
After doing a bit of acid its really hard to think deep enough to have another ‘existential crisis’. I am fully capable of thinking deeply, but no longer have as much emotion behind my thoughts. Not much, emotionally, is scary. I am very sure of myself these days, and as compelling as the thought is, we’re not brains in test tubes. And birds aren’t real.
If I was a brain in a vat and someone was orchestrating my environment and controlling all that I saw and experienced, why would they want me to see this video?
Amazing video! This theory is further supported by dreams, which also seem "real" to the dreamer. One note, the video states: "our conscious experience is generated by processes in the brain." This isn't an agreed upon fact. According to the panpsychism theory, consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe. (it only seems that consciousness originates from the brain).
Can't know for sure! I often wonder if the whole world is just in my head. Lots of stuff supports that idea, really. Like crazy coincidences or superstition.
I know what you mean. I've had some crazy synchronicities happen to me. Brain in a vat is true in some sense. All sensory perception is interpreted in the brain. Even the concept of a brain is just a mental concept.
@@Richietek318 how would you know the limits of your creativity? Maybe you are assigning creative genius to these sounds you've created and labeled them master pieces.
@@liberationwasalie2982 Nope. Embodiment is our access to real. "Real" is an interactional hybrid of our subjective engagement with an environment. Our organism happens over time and has evolved as one living process within an evolving environment. Our very concepts are gathered beyond the vat via inter action. No creature even makes sense apart from its environment. Our bodies are not just vessles for the sloshings of a brain, they actually shape our concepts by extending beyond the vat. It is in action itself that the real is established. The something it is to be a bat is embodiment. Our understanding of consciousness, if real, will be a particular understanding in light of embodiment.
I had a really troubling and detailed dream a couple months back about being forced into a VAT and having to surrender to what I thought was really happening to me till I woke up suddenly, it continues to bother me a lot
I also think we could live in a very very powerful and complex simulation created in actual reality which would be impossible for us to experience reality because we are just very complex data processed by a seemingly infinite powerful computer. The simulation could be so powerful it even allows the AI consiousness which is what we could be in this simulation to be able to think of such crazy conclusions about reality. It could be so convincing it even simulates death and what we experience after death based on what religion we believe in during life. The creaters of the simulation might even make a robot in the actual world in which our AI or data from this simulation could be transfered to to be able experience the actual reality.
Maybe the thought of your comment is just the byproduct of the electrical impulses made by an unknown external force. Can’t be trusted. Check out my recent comment
David Gruen wbu the ramifications? Maybe it is trying to break you and make you feel miserable for all eternity with no way out. The neuroscientist is preventing you from enjoying anything
You'll find more videos such as discussions about #filosofix here: www.srf.ch/kultur/gesellschaft-religion/filosofix. For more videos in other languages see: www.srf.ch/sendungen/myschool/philosophie-ueber-sprachgrenzen-hinweg. Have fun!
Tell that to the animal who eats you alive-tell me is that the simulation of the brain? No it isn't because if animal eats you alive your brain does not exist anymore-so the animal is real, and not some production of of the mind-all of this can be easily tested and disprove brain in a vat hypothesis.
@Retro Mammoth What about drugs, they change your perception of reality, and I know that could be induced to a brain in a vat, but in our reality some of us take them to feel the effects, so If That's will power we actually aren't brains in vats
Supposing that it is possible for a moment that we have the technology to do such a thing, we would still be able to tell if it’s real because human interactions are complex and we would recognize unexplainable anomalies. It would be like trying to talk with a sophisticated AI, although to be fair I think it is possible that our AI capabilities are getting much better
The observer is the consciousness all theories of metaphysics try to define. In this theory, conciseness is in the brain & the brain is suspended in a vat being fed sensory stimuli.
The only difference between the brain getting stimulation in a solution vs actually not is WILL. The free will of the brain owner to do anything, feed his brain right here, right now😂
Even if we were brains in a vat on a quantum level, we are all one of the same. Even the mad scientist is a configuration of atoms and energy, and based on the first law of thermodynamics energy cannot be naturally created or destroyed only transferred everything is relative therefore this reality is real to me because it is the reality that I perceive everything from. Quantum level we are both conscious Therefore, if I say, Jesus is the truth, I am correct and vice versa. If I say, I am a brain in a jar and the scientist is watching us. He is also correct from his point of view. No matter what we all will die, we will both be the same and return as pure energy. God bless you and don’t let things get to you, you are in control of your reality ❤
@@catplayingapiano2799 What made you normalise? Was it through logical reasoning or something else? Please answer, these thoughts are very disturbing. Thanks.
What about the brain of the gut and the heart? The brain is not the only brain in the human body. And the heart produces substantially more electricity than the brain
If I'm a brain in a vat living my life. How can I even proof I was me before my brain was put in a vat? Cause damn in that case don't disconnect me dog, I'm having a pretty good deal here tbh. HAHA
2:01:So how do you know that's not already happened to you now?Me:Because i've never been K.O,drugged or fainted,and also we don't have the technology to recopy and simulate :the laws of physics,looks,graphics,etc to make indistinguishable simulations from real life,not even combining all our quantum computers would have the power and memory to store and process the infomation needed to simulate a million atoms(a typical human hair is about 1000000 carbon-12 atoms in width while a drop of water contains roughly 50.58x10^20 atoms.that is why.
This is probable and we can’t know anything for certain. But we don’t live that way. We live as though we know things for certain, and we DO know things for certain. I know I’m on my TH-cam app, commenting in the comments of this silly thought experiment video. I am able to justify my certainty because, like all of us, we know that God exists. You see, in order to know anything at all, you would have to know everything because there could be some information that could contradict everything that you think you know. SO, we either have to know everything, or have revelation from the God that does. That’s the Christian worldview. Jesus Christ didn’t just die to save sinners, he died to save reason. If you say you could be wrong about everything you claim to know, could you be wrong about that? It’s absurdity. And that’s your options you have God or absurdity, but people choose absurdity because they love their sin.
an now imagine you combine multible brains. there would be ONE consciousness. thath means yours "myself" is just an illusion - you don't actually exist - there are just multiple signals communicating in your brain and making this illusion.
Exactly! I hate it so much that people suggest the thought experiment, and yet not provide any conclusion or closure, leaving us to suffer in crippling anxiety.
If you were a brain in a vat you wouldn't have bad things happen to you. Good things happen to some, bad things to others. It doesn't make any sense to have that.
This is viciously circular. I think, therefore I am. Existence is assumed in the first premise. I(existence)think, therefore I (existence) am. The Christian presuppositionalist uses circular reasoning. In fact, everyone uses some degree of circular reasoning when defending his ultimate standard (though not everyone realizes this fact). Yet if used properly, this use of circular reasoning is not arbitrary and, therefore, not fallacious. Circular reasoning is surprisingly a valid argument. The conclusion does follow from the premises. Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy only when it is arbitrary, proving nothing beyond what it assumes. However, not all circular reasoning is fallacious. Certain standards must be assumed. Dr. Jason Lisle gave this example of a non-arbitrary use of circular reasoning: Without laws of logic, we could not make an argument. We can make an argument. Therefore, there must be laws of logic.1 While this argument is circular, it is a non-fallacious use of circular reasoning. Since we couldn’t prove anything apart from the laws of logic, we must presuppose the laws of logic even to prove they exist. In fact, if someone were trying to disprove that laws of logic exist, he’d have to use the laws of logic in his attempt, thereby refuting himself. You must agree there are certain standards that can be proven with circular reasoning. My basic presupposition-God exists and has revealed Himself in His inerrant, authoritative Word-is the ultimate standard. Presupposing God exists to argue that God exists is a reasonable circular argument because without the God of the Bible, we have no basis for assuming the laws of logic and their properties, let alone absolute morality or the uniformity of nature.
That's not circular reasoning. Define existence; What is existence? If existence is conscious and the ability to be aware then consciousness means you exist. Most people agree that's what existence means.
That's the whole point. That's what makes it interesting. Actually, no. In this theory, the being only perceives that they exist in the perceived world and has no proof that the world in the being's perception even exists outside of the perception.
This troubled me deeply when I was a teenager. I can use my intuition to deduce that I'm not a brain in a vat. But why can I trust my intuition? It seemed like circular reasoning, and I became terrified that the rational probability of my intuition and sensory information being reliable was therefore 50%. Now I don't think this, I think that raw intuition is infallible. But it terrified me horribly for a while.
Tim Crinion how did you get over it? How did you convince yourself? Did you find evidence against this, if so what?
@@Seasonal-Shadow_4674 The whole point is that you can't prove it lol.
To be fair, does it really matter? Either your brain is in a vat, or it's in a human body. To you, both scenario's are 'real' anyway. Whether the first or the second is true doesn't really change anything, to you both experiences are 'real'.
In my opinion there is no real meaning to life anyway, we're just here for a good time and then we die. So just try to enjoy the ride.
Hope it helps.
@@Seasonal-Shadow_4674 please stand up
by the way free will doesnt exist. oops sorry didn't mean to scare you
Raw intuition isn't infallible, but it is certainly useful.
I'm too high for this. I'm having an existential crisis lmao
yo same bud
scientists: THEY KNOW! PULL THE PLUG
If you/me/us were in a simulation/illusion and the creators don't want you/me/us know why would they even let me/you/us have the idea in the first place?
THE JD Civ so you feel trapped and miserable for their evil pleasure
@@the_jd6967 there's an x factor to everything cause there's fire in the fabric of everything.
the matrix*
I'm just a brain in a vat in Plato's cave
@@SmashedHatProject if you only knew how true this comment is.
I'm dyin' in a vat in the garaaage
Abstract Physics help let me out. This is not a joke
Alejandro Miller-Santos uhm u okay sir
@@apolos1fan this is not a dance*
I simply would not let the scientist do this to me. I’m built different
how will u stop them to do what they want..?? as they have ur brains control with them==
After doing a bit of acid its really hard to think deep enough to have another ‘existential crisis’. I am fully capable of thinking deeply, but no longer have as much emotion behind my thoughts. Not much, emotionally, is scary. I am very sure of myself these days, and as compelling as the thought is, we’re not brains in test tubes. And birds aren’t real.
underrated comment
Glizzzzieeess
Glizzies everywhere
Excellent animation and narration - thank you both as a teacher and as a lover of wisdom!
A lot of this comes down to personal choice.
Some logical arguments cannot be proven. That does not make them real or false.
If I was a brain in a vat and someone was orchestrating my environment and controlling all that I saw and experienced, why would they want me to see this video?
For the hell of it and too see whatll happen
nice=actually i am the handler of all of the brains tick toking in this world and i want to see how you will fight with me=
If I was a brain in a vat, they wouldn't be showing me videos about being a brain in a vat. Checkmate.
nice=actually i am the handler of all of the brains tick toking in this world and i want to see how you will fight with me=permanent checkmatenice
they actually do, just to mess with you
Yes we do, its funnier this way.
Amazing video! This theory is further supported by dreams, which also seem "real" to the dreamer.
One note, the video states: "our conscious experience is generated by processes in the brain." This isn't an agreed upon fact. According to the panpsychism theory, consciousness is a fundamental property of the universe. (it only seems that consciousness originates from the brain).
Does music originate in the radio?
I exist, therefore I can think :)
EDGAR BEJA
It's I think, therefore I am
Can't know for sure! I often wonder if the whole world is just in my head. Lots of stuff supports that idea, really. Like crazy coincidences or superstition.
I know what you mean. I've had some crazy synchronicities happen to me. Brain in a vat is true in some sense. All sensory perception is interpreted in the brain. Even the concept of a brain is just a mental concept.
I wouldn't be so arrogant as to say I am the author of Beethoven's 5th Symphony or the Mona Lisa. These are not manifestations of MY creativity.
@@Richietek318 how would you know the limits of your creativity? Maybe you are assigning creative genius to these sounds you've created and labeled them master pieces.
arent our bodies just a brain in a vat basically?
@@liberationwasalie2982 Nope. Embodiment is our access to real. "Real" is an interactional hybrid of our subjective engagement with an environment. Our organism happens over time and has evolved as one living process within an evolving environment. Our very concepts are gathered beyond the vat via inter action. No creature even makes sense apart from its environment. Our bodies are not just vessles for the sloshings of a brain, they actually shape our concepts by extending beyond the vat. It is in action itself that the real is established. The something it is to be a bat is embodiment. Our understanding of consciousness, if real, will be a particular understanding in light of embodiment.
The thinker is the thought. Thought happens because of the VAt nutrient. And that is the brain which is continuous with the whole universe.
If so, then are we all in the same vat?
You could just be perceiving others who don’t actually exist.
@@FantazomiXroma so it’s like solipsism + brain in vat
@@FantazomiXromalmfao do you actually think like this?
I had a really troubling and detailed dream a couple months back about being forced into a VAT and having to surrender to what I thought was really happening to me till I woke up suddenly, it continues to bother me a lot
Maybe the dream was real, and now you’re just a brain in a jar?
I also think we could live in a very very powerful and complex simulation created in actual reality which would be impossible for us to experience reality because we are just very complex data processed by a seemingly infinite powerful computer. The simulation could be so powerful it even allows the AI consiousness which is what we could be in this simulation to be able to think of such crazy conclusions about reality. It could be so convincing it even simulates death and what we experience after death based on what religion we believe in during life. The creaters of the simulation might even make a robot in the actual world in which our AI or data from this simulation could be transfered to to be able experience the actual reality.
You just exposed every neuroscientist
Maybe the thought of your comment is just the byproduct of the electrical impulses made by an unknown external force. Can’t be trusted. Check out my recent comment
One thing for sure is whether you are a brain or not, what really matters is whether you are enjoying it or not.
David Gruen wbu the ramifications? Maybe it is trying to break you and make you feel miserable for all eternity with no way out. The neuroscientist is preventing you from enjoying anything
@comic sans Black Mirror: Bandersnatch th-cam.com/video/ZM_eagS4HyQ/w-d-xo.html ; and The Matrix th-cam.com/video/7CDGAHI3_tA/w-d-xo.html
Well now I have to listen to The weeknd.... or am I actually listening to him?
Fr what I was about to do lmao
Very nice graphics and excellent explanation. Please make a detailed video
Such an amazing idea. But is there a tv program such as discussion about them? And if yes please tell me how to watch that online.
Thanks again
You'll find more videos such as discussions about #filosofix here: www.srf.ch/kultur/gesellschaft-religion/filosofix. For more videos in other languages see: www.srf.ch/sendungen/myschool/philosophie-ueber-sprachgrenzen-hinweg. Have fun!
then how do we even know brains really exist?
That’s the matrix theory. Same shit but a computer is in place of a brain
Tell that to the animal who eats you alive-tell me is that the simulation of the brain? No it isn't because if animal eats you alive your brain does not exist anymore-so the animal is real, and not some production of of the mind-all of this can be easily tested and disprove brain in a vat hypothesis.
@Retro Mammoth What about drugs, they change your perception of reality, and I know that could be induced to a brain in a vat, but in our reality some of us take them to feel the effects, so If That's will power we actually aren't brains in vats
Bruh
I'm glad to see Descartes also did not bother to wear pants while WFH. Who knew he was relatable?
Supposing that it is possible for a moment that we have the technology to do such a thing, we would still be able to tell if it’s real because human interactions are complex and we would recognize unexplainable anomalies. It would be like trying to talk with a sophisticated AI, although to be fair I think it is possible that our AI capabilities are getting much better
As soon as the drugging happened, i immediately think re animator
It is not new for thousands of years people had this intuiton when dreaming
So, who is the observer? Are humans just universe in human's form, experiencing itself?
The observer is the consciousness all theories of metaphysics try to define. In this theory, conciseness is in the brain & the brain is suspended in a vat being fed sensory stimuli.
Haven't you seen matrix
Great animation man. You got my subscription
The scientist who controls my brain must be high or stupid because my life is boring
They made your life boring so you are bored for eternity for their sadistic entertainment
Facts
The only difference between the brain getting stimulation in a solution vs actually not is WILL.
The free will of the brain owner to do anything, feed his brain right here, right now😂
best animation
Excellent didi
I want another vat
Even if we were brains in a vat on a quantum level, we are all one of the same. Even the mad scientist is a configuration of atoms and energy, and based on the first law of thermodynamics energy cannot be naturally created or destroyed only transferred everything is relative therefore this reality is real to me because it is the reality that I perceive everything from.
Quantum level we are both conscious
Therefore, if I say, Jesus is the truth, I am correct and vice versa. If I say, I am a brain in a jar and the scientist is watching us. He is also correct from his point of view. No matter what we all will die, we will both be the same and return as pure energy.
God bless you and don’t let things get to you, you are in control of your reality ❤
This is impossible because we need soul to live and consiousness dont come from the brain
And the demiurge is a mad scientist
my existencial doubs are really showing right now
Same thing for two months. Did you get over this?
Nice
It's all in the electrons.
I am a poor schizophrenic and I frequently have ideas of Matrix, Truman show, solipsism etc
Do the thoughts bother you?
I used to have these thoughts some years back. Sometimes it made me stay awake at night, eventually i normalized.
Free will is an illusion
@@catplayingapiano2799 What made you normalise? Was it through logical reasoning or something else? Please answer, these thoughts are very disturbing. Thanks.
so is the scientist brain in a vat stimulating your brain in a vat
Damn MATRIX!!!
What about the brain of the gut and the heart? The brain is not the only brain in the human body. And the heart produces substantially more electricity than the brain
I think therefore someone exists
If I'm a brain in a vat living my life. How can I even proof I was me before my brain was put in a vat? Cause damn in that case don't disconnect me dog, I'm having a pretty good deal here tbh. HAHA
*In the description* Tought experiment. Lol
Welcome to the machine
Why would a neuroscientist try to attempt taking a patients brain? Only a neurosurgeon knows how to properly make this procedure.
Thats my Life
Isn't that what dreams are
Mother Brain Took me here
Way too much detail in the graphics lol.
Wow, it's like the writers of this watched The Matrix. . . .
2:01:So how do you know that's not already happened to you now?Me:Because i've never been K.O,drugged or fainted,and also we don't have the technology to recopy and simulate :the laws of physics,looks,graphics,etc to make indistinguishable simulations from real life,not even combining all our quantum computers would have the power and memory to store and process the infomation needed to simulate a million atoms(a typical human hair is about 1000000 carbon-12 atoms in width while a drop of water contains roughly 50.58x10^20 atoms.that is why.
I agree! God told me not only there no technology possible to make such a device,but he also told me that he would let anyone do such a sin
@@jeandaro3456 You are crazy.
This is probable and we can’t know anything for certain. But we don’t live that way. We live as though we know things for certain, and we DO know things for certain. I know I’m on my TH-cam app, commenting in the comments of this silly thought experiment video. I am able to justify my certainty because, like all of us, we know that God exists. You see, in order to know anything at all, you would have to know everything because there could be some information that could contradict everything that you think you know. SO, we either have to know everything, or have revelation from the God that does. That’s the Christian worldview. Jesus Christ didn’t just die to save sinners, he died to save reason. If you say you could be wrong about everything you claim to know, could you be wrong about that? It’s absurdity. And that’s your options you have God or absurdity, but people choose absurdity because they love their sin.
Anyone else doing this for rs hw
an now imagine you combine multible brains. there would be ONE consciousness. thath means yours "myself" is just an illusion - you don't actually exist - there are just multiple signals communicating in your brain and making this illusion.
Well mein thats what psychonauts is about.
So moral of the story?
Exactly! I hate it so much that people suggest the thought experiment, and yet not provide any conclusion or closure, leaving us to suffer in crippling anxiety.
If you were a brain in a vat you wouldn't have bad things happen to you. Good things happen to some, bad things to others. It doesn't make any sense to have that.
You're assuming that the operator of the signals has ruled out the possibility of bad things happening to you.
Who says we need brain cell? Have enough states in the universe and you can make a counciense.😊
Awesome
That's impossible
You don't know what you don't know.
I know because my brain in inside my head and there are billions of other brains that are in skulls and not vats
This is viciously circular. I think, therefore I am. Existence is assumed in the first premise. I(existence)think, therefore I (existence) am.
The Christian presuppositionalist uses circular reasoning. In fact, everyone uses some degree of circular reasoning when defending his ultimate standard (though not everyone realizes this fact). Yet if used properly, this use of circular reasoning is not arbitrary and, therefore, not fallacious.
Circular reasoning is surprisingly a valid argument. The conclusion does follow from the premises. Circular reasoning is a logical fallacy only when it is arbitrary, proving nothing beyond what it assumes.
However, not all circular reasoning is fallacious. Certain standards must be assumed. Dr. Jason Lisle gave this example of a non-arbitrary use of circular reasoning:
Without laws of logic, we could not make an argument.
We can make an argument.
Therefore, there must be laws of logic.1
While this argument is circular, it is a non-fallacious use of circular reasoning. Since we couldn’t prove anything apart from the laws of logic, we must presuppose the laws of logic even to prove they exist. In fact, if someone were trying to disprove that laws of logic exist, he’d have to use the laws of logic in his attempt, thereby refuting himself. You must agree there are certain standards that can be proven with circular reasoning.
My basic presupposition-God exists and has revealed Himself in His inerrant, authoritative Word-is the ultimate standard. Presupposing God exists to argue that God exists is a reasonable circular argument because without the God of the Bible, we have no basis for assuming the laws of logic and their properties, let alone absolute morality or the uniformity of nature.
That's not circular reasoning. Define existence; What is existence? If existence is conscious and the ability to be aware then consciousness means you exist. Most people agree that's what existence means.
lol
Evennif is not real councirnse it still is even if it ks nlt what we think it is.
I know my brain is not in a vat because I have no scars from the brain surgery.
More sci-fi nonsense.
The truth is even more bizarre.
More like, too late....were already brains in jars....
why is it so gore-y
the question is not that interesting. the world does not exist independently of a being since a being is a being in the world.
That's the whole point. That's what makes it interesting. Actually, no. In this theory, the being only perceives that they exist in the perceived world and has no proof that the world in the being's perception even exists outside of the perception.