The sizeof operator in C

[@ericfricke4512]

You do a great job explaining concepts! Thanks for the content.

[@monikaparmar2061]

One of the best tutorials in C out there in TH-cam. Thanks.

[@thiagoflores9029]

Thanks Man. Thanks to you I'm able to begin with my codes. You are the best!

[@al-farabinagashbayev5403]

man you are great keep doing your tutorials please) they are great)

[@puceno]

you have gained my subscription

[@shirinnurlyyeva508]

neat explanation.thanx

[@pixbug3359]

Nailed it! thank uuu

[@abhishektiwari2507]

Thank you 😊

[@parshuram3191]

Man... You are so cool. THis is gold......

[@cesarislas7130]

Thank you so much.

[@mgharbi1209]

thank you !

[@matthewkothe80]

This man is a god among men.

[@gexanxavian]

thanks bro

[@el1fozun]

U R BESTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

[@zyghom]

@4:29 - no, you don't get number of the elements in the array - you get the number of possible elements (max) in the array. Good example above: array for 10 elements but only 3 with values, right?

[@CodeVault]

Yes, that's more correct. I think that's what I meant to say: "the maximum number of elements".

[@zyghom]

@@CodeVault and I think this is the reason many functions (libraries or so) that work with arrays usually ask for 2 parameters: array itself AND the number of elements in the array (but not the possible numbers of the array) to compute (or postprocess) the arrays values. Unless you flag the end of variables i.e. with one specific number, that would represent: "this is the last element of my array - don't go any further" - that is bew how the c-strings work right - character ZERO that say: "no more string please - rest is a garbage" ;-)

[@CodeVault]

Exactly right

[@user-zx6hh8jj7l]

We are you from? You have interesting accent

[@CodeVault]

Romania