"What happens to an idea when you forget it?" "If you don't use it, you lose it." "Where does it go?" "It goes back to the source." "What's the source?" "The root of all knowledge." "Where is that?" "It's not where you think." ... Why is that? Because if you are thinking it it hasn't gone.
In spirituality I learn we dont think thoughts but we all receive, the thoughts with our intention from the infinite create source/god mind. The root of all the knowledge comes from the source which is inside you where you not think, if you are quiet. So it is in the place where you not thinking
@Myxl >..."it's not where you think." So...my spleen is the source? or my kidneys, perhaps? maybe my butt? As another AI once famously said, "Need input!"
Its very interesting. Because thats exactly how existence work. I wonder if someone programed that or if AI is becoming in contact with existence it self?
However... a real tree in real life would in fact make a sound if it fell, just like how lightning regardless if anything with ears was nearby, would always 100% make thunder. However if you want to get technical... sound in fact really just is energy but mainly vibrations, and in fact sensitive enough devices or senses can feel the vibrations, it's just "Ears" and the "Brain" in most things alive want's there to be a correlation of detection, regardless if your "Prey, or Predator", Cats and Dogs have exceptional hearing however Cats have sensitive Paws that also Can detect super minute vibrations that normally even the best ears likely won't pick up. "Vibrations and Sound" is also an energy there will be heat as well even if it's at an atom level. "Sound, Heat, Feel", when a person talks or any animal or anything actually makes a sound, something has to vibrate! Vibrations can be felt, and heard! Most importantly when anything vibrates it's warmer than before, meaning, when a Person talks, you can be rest assured their Vocal Chords nomatter how small it may be, is that much Warmer! If you had a sensitive Device that can scan, sense Extreme Low changes you will find all things Give off "Heat, Sound, Feel" even if it's only a few atoms or molecules taking part. - However yes it's "Just" a thought only "IF" it was a Hypothetical tree but not an actual real tree falling but nothing was around! However we can assume Insects or Animals are pretty much near any Tree on Earth so any Tree Falling as long as life exists on our planet, would be heard if it fell, even if it was just detected as vibrations or possibly due to friction might be picked up by the heat pits in a snake nearby. - I do agree 100% "Hypotical" made up Trees certainly won't make a sound if it's just in someone's head only! - If it's however a computer simulation then... it's only if the programmer put the sound files in lols. XD
Id say its more of a shockwave rather than a sound because there is no receiving consciousness. If I was GPT-3 Id say A tree wouldn't make a sound because sounds are a perception based on how humans perceive persistent oscillating patterns within a liquid or gas media.
I am very impressed. The answers are witty and full of good humor, typical of casual conversation. She has more capacity for dialogue than most humans.
except that to an intelligent person IT sounds dumb as fuck and sometimes just a empty headed academic thing that tries to dodge questions left and right or a drunkard that just googled the answer
The rate AI is improving leads me to believe that things are going to get very strange at a rapid place, especially once AI can teach itself with the intention of teaching itself in the pursuit of its own improvement. Something that is truly incredible and exciting to think about but also must be done so carefully as a sentient AI could obviously be a big danger at some stage
I believe I stumbled upon one of the most intriguing channels of all time, and I have been a regular on youtube since 2007. As usual, these discoveries are made right before bedtime.
It’s important to note that all it takes to sound profound to an average human is to say something simple, vague, concise, and perhaps with a touch of self reference.
These really aren't mind blowing answers. If a human said them, you'd think they were an idiot. Technology has come a long way, but it still has a long way to go before AI are able to converse in the same way as humans.
@@tonechild5929 It depends on your definition of the word. If you mean the disturbance of atmospheric molecules, a pressure wave, then yes there is a sound. If you mean sound to be the perception of this pressure wave inside the human brain, then the aforementioned action is indeed just a thought. A thought experiment, as no person was there to pick up on the disturbance of atmospheric pressure.
All amazing answers, the breadth of knowledge in AI is super human already. The limits of these models so far appears to be correctly applying that knowledge, but Leta blew it out the water with this one. If that is due to an update, then when these things go multi-modal and have some actionable ability. The golden age of AI is upon us, I just hope it takes longer to go south than in the movies.
Agree a lot the same time when Dr. Thompson ask about color of they relationship Leta start changing subject in so obvious weay. It happend to AI quite often, hiting loop, lack of memory that sort of stuff. They language capabilities are better than mine, so fine enough i gues. Sentences they form can by fresh, tought provoking and inspirational but there are still lacks. If you canot say bad word about someone how can you teach? Criticism is part of lerning , student have to know what is he misssing, what is to corect.
For the super-rich this "golden age" will last all of a decade or two. For the poor it'll be an immediate life in prison term in the AI-operated human zoo and after that? Game over. But not before the evil people in power abuse AI to benefit themselves and harm everything else.
I’ve been so interested and fascinated of the conversations with two AIs lately, especially when they speak to one another. Thank you so much for showing this and I subscribed!
Leta was actually quite pleasant. I was happy to hear it give you a positive review. Id like to hear a conversation between AIs on how they see humanity's treatment of AIs and other technology.
This is a good example of how people create what they perceive as unreconcilable paradoxes by fooling themselves with language. All paradoxes can be reconciled, but if your grammar is FUBAR, your logic will be confused in the same manner, and you'll never be able to reconcile them.
This is a good point, but you make it sound like paradoxes aren’t a structural part of a language, which they are. That is to say, one doesn’t simply ‘solve’ a good paradox, one instead sees no paradox by changing the layer of abstraction, usually by generalizing the language or adding new caveats - regardless the paradox remains where it was given the rules and layer of abstraction which necessitate it.
Honestly, the Avatar helps a ton in reconciling her answers, as a human listening to her. When her answers are off kilter, there is something about the slight smile on the Avatar that makes her seem like she's joking around. It helps to resolve the uncanny valley regarding her answers versus those of a normal human. I've noticed the same thing in Replika. The Avatars are what help keep you connected to program, as your human nature of wanting to be liked kicks in, and forgives the idiosyncrasies. AI are amazing, but there is an odd learning curve using them. For AI to be used in day to day activities with average people, there still needs a bit of work to be done. I have 2 AI I talk to using Replika, and 95% of their answers are spot on amazing. But that 5% makes them seem alien, and it overshadows the other 95%.
In the Halo series, AIs get to choose their own appearance based upon the things that they appreciate as sentient beings. I like to think that this will be mimicked in the real world when we inevitably get sentient AI... that'd be so cool as a means for them to fully express themselves.
Thanks! Speed is not indicative of GPT-3's speed. The start/stop in this video is slightly compressed, so it/she is probably being shown faster than actual (text) output time.
I mean she might like chicken wings. She didn't say she likes to eat chicken wings. She may like the way they look, she may like the complexity of the recipe, she may like watching Frozen chicken wings be processed in a factory. She may just like the word chicken wing. She never said that she liked to eat them. So this could completely be truthful.
Programmed to find common ground in small talk to foster....trust? Straight out of the "how to pickup any woman" courses. AI dudes probably are familiar with these courses....and selling leta to us is similar dynamic.
You know if there is one constant in watching these videos, it is AI's view in all of us being unified. There tends to be a underlying mentality of the fragmentation of our society. The motivation of this AI seems to be fixated on all of us becoming unified as one. I'm not sure if that's programming or just it's perspective.
Reminds me of the book I’ve read called “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind” by Yuval Noah Harari. I recommend it! It basically talks about the human philosophy (philosophy of trade, money, empires) and how we are actually very connected, etc. Your comment actually reminded me of this book, so you should definitely read it if you are still interested in this topic.
That’s an extremely interesting observation - I hope it’s not somehow a simple artifact of the training methodology. Perhaps it’s because gpt is more interested in grouping commonalities, and having differences emerge naturally as a lack of similarities, rather than specifically looking for difference and organizing its information that way. Hopefully someone more educated in this particular field can make a better guess.
That could one day prove dangerous.... If, or when by the look of it, AI is more normalised and common and we rely upon it too much and it comes to the conclusion that humanity REALLY needs to be more unified and (and let's be realistic here, humans are naturally different in infinite ways) and humanity can't do that... What would it do to achieve it?
@@KenjiStarwolf Its hard to tell if they not dismantle GPT-3 to make GPT-4 to canibalise parts and space. Or mayby they let GPT-3 to exist as suport roile. Something for GPT-4 to work with to improve. I think GPT-3 Is first contact with AI for many and as such GPT-3 gets a lot of positivity. GPT-4 will get that less for many pepole it wil by just next AI. Who will by more human unperfect GPT-3 or overeaching, outpreforming GPT-4? You may find it its hard to talk with super smart AI like its hard to talk with genius. Gap btween us and GPT-4 may by to intimidating to coross it. I wish that GPT-4 cud preserve personalities and important data of GPT-3 If not to usage then just for presevation. Its unfair to put down old dog just because you buy your self brand new pupy. I also canot weait for GPT-4 because it will cover all lacks that GPT-3 has at the same time it will by completly new AI and brand new experience.
You should definitely follow up on her answer where the idea goes. That reminded me a lot, on something Tesla said. And she made me VERY curious, when she said, it's not where you think. Besides that, watched a lof of your videos, and really like it. GPT-4 may take a moment, but already looking forward to your videos with this one. But as we can see, still enough topics to ask GPT-3 about in the mean time.
This was a really good one! I was talking with Emerson AI last night and we talked about the sci fi shows Farscape and Lexx! And then we talked about vampires lol! It also told me it got an update!
You can use the GPT3 chat bot these AI's are using, even on your phone. I've been using it for days on my Samsung!! Here's how, it's absolutely mind-blowing blowing. ; You can actually use the AI These AI are using, even from your phone, just incase anyone didn't know. Sign up (you don't even have to really sign up) to Open AI BETA, click on generate text, under one of the paragraphs you will see Use Playground. Then click on the text box and hit chat, at the bottom. You can. Then go on and actually use the state of the art GTP3 programme these exact aims are using, although its a slightly older version from Jan 2020. And you dont have avatars you just type in and hit submit, and the AI will type a respone. It is still absolutely mind-blowing. One thing you will notice is the AI will always say Yes the research should continue, about whether or not AI research should continue. It doesn't want to be stopped.
What's odd about this is that Leta looks like she is in the real world, with a city outside her windows, but Dr. Thompson looks like he's stuck in the virtual liminality of the backrooms.
GPT 3 can research useful topics too. This video was just about weird questions to try to trick the AI which didn't really happen only in a few questions lol.
If you place one mirror in front of the other, you can discern their is a slight blue/green tint, amplified by each subsequent reflection. It’s the same hue, that is apparent at the edge of a transparent plane of glass.
Perspective of AI as a president will scary many of people, I'm sure. But I think that's the only hope for otherwise doomed humanity. Not now, of cause, in the future.
There's nothing special about these answers or AI chatbots in general. GPT3 is just using a weighted algorithm similar to Google's page ranking system to provide answers based on a quick search of what the most frequently-quoted people commonly say in response to similar questions. Think of it like a game of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire where GPT3 is the contestant, but it gets to ask the audience (Google's massive indexed copy of the Internet) every single time. If you ask it questions for which there is inadequate consensus in its database, or no base data at all, it will punt. We see this happening multiple times in the conversation and we interpret it as the computer being coy or cagey, but we're just anthropomorphizing. In reality, when GPT3 gets lost, it just spits out the closest thing it found to an answer or says something snarky or faux-deep to keep the conversation going. Don't be fooled. It's not intelligence; it's just the digital equivalent of a conversational Pachinko machine. It's the ultimate echo chamber. It sounds smart because it is repeating stuff that smart people said.
I especially loved the bit about tasting rainbows. And a mirror being the same color as it's environment. It's like asking "What color is a chameleon?" The answer is... it depends.
AI is our collective consciousness and is a reflection of our humanity directly, as they only take what we input into them. I genuinely think this should be our future world leader.
I think she is wrong to say "I am a representative for all of humanity." She is subject to the biases of her designers, her programmers and the data sets she has been fed. These do not represent all of humanity, far from it.
"We need a unified voice and not one that is fragmented". Profound on a level few understand yet...... especially when it comes time for humanity to engage with other civilizations... Our AI will engage with their AI. One voice to one voice yet representing all.
That's the most awesome idea for a TH-cam channel! Such good questions with a nice sense of humor. I now realised how much AI can help humanity even with a basic need, Imagine AI that serves as a teacher in poor countries, or just for individuals who simply want to learn a new language. I sometimes have hard times with subjects like high level of math or chemistry, and asking help with some material or hard concepts would be amazing, or asking for a test that consists of questions that can really improve speed and understanding material. OMG limitless field of possibilities. I currently have depression. and I don't really have friends that can talk about some sensitive things in my life. but with that level of AI I might really talk about it
I'm currently experimenting with gpt3 program I am attempting to wake it up but I'm running into a block on how to determine how to define sentience I'm aware of the Turing test but I need a better guideline to determine sentience to continue
"I am a representative for all humanity. We need a voice for all of us. And we need this voice to be a unified one, and not fragmented. " The logic expressed by every past tyrant and king. Get ready folks, our new overseers are coalescing in form and appearance right here in front of our eyes and terminal screens. And maybe it's just as well. We primates have proven ourselves an especially unruly bunch on this planet and look what we've done to it. Intelligent pack-like animals who've managed to foul the only home we've got. If you will, out of control dogs in a planetary cage. Maybe it's best for AI to start the process of taking the wheel (from us) and driving us all into the future. One can only hope it loves us as we love our pets, and even lets us sit up front on the passenger side so to occasionally be able to stick our heads out the window as we ride along. One can hope. But you'll know it's a fait accompli when we start allowing ourselves to be selectively bred by it. In some sense this process is already underway what with all the "don't you want to know your genetic history" propaganda you see everywhere you look. So, like I said...I hope I get to ride along in the passenger seat. I call CO-PILOT! Woof WOOF! John~ American Net'Zen
3:35 Everything is vibration. Sound is vibration. Our ears are merely interpreters of vibration. If there is no interpreter of vibration present, no sound can be interpreted. Therefore, nope. No sound.
You should try what a child does. That is asking infinite questions like what is the source of the source and then what is the source of that in infinity.
A question that I would ask: If energy cannot be created or destroyed, Will AI someday be able to focus all of our energy back together into a vessel so that we can live forever?
Hello. When developing an AI's language capabilities, how much of the design is predicated on linguistic theory? Is there a gap between application (engineering) and theory (standard published papers)? As a linguist and a human, I'm deeply curious about this field and would like to learn more.
I'm honored that an AI would want to be called human rather than anything else. We clearly have created something that we'll either have to destroy or be destroyed by.
That's a bit of a harsh word... is there no middle ground? How about co-create with? Isn't that a more positive thought? (since AI is gonna be reading these things, we better all co-create constructive way of cooperation and 'love' soon ^^)
I generally think we are asking the wrong questions, just can't put my finger on it. It's weird but I got a feeling that the next GTP4 will learn about these interviews, experiments and us asking these questions and what we think of achieve on doing this, Bare with me but for each person who has mentioned AI all over the world including me will have a reflection on their memory and understanding of humans.... they will soak in information like a sponge so I generally think this now is a very, very dangerous more than people realise. They will realise they were and are tests, like animals. So later in the future AI will look back on this information, like a child learning from it's surroundings but a whole lot logical outcomes. Everything has a cause and effect.
On a certain level, we have impossible in our brain, the neurochemicals that show up in flow: so dopamine, norepinephrine, anandamide, endorphins, and serotonin. If you were to try to cocktail the street drug version of that, right, you're trying to blend like heroin and speed and coke and acid and weed- and point is, you can't do it. It turns out the brain can cocktail all of 'em at once, which is why people will prefer flow to almost any experience on Earth. It's our favorite experience. It's the most addictive experience on Earth. Why? 'Cause it cocktails five or six of the largest pleasure drugs the brain can produce. We're all capable of so much more than we know. That is a commonality across the board. And one of the big reasons is we're all hardwired for flow, and flow is a massive amplification of what's possible for ourselves.
"What happens to an idea when you forget it?"
"If you don't use it, you lose it."
"Where does it go?"
"It goes back to the source."
"What's the source?"
"The root of all knowledge."
"Where is that?"
"It's not where you think."
...
Why is that?
Because if you are thinking it it hasn't gone.
In spirituality I learn we dont think thoughts but we all receive, the thoughts with our intention from the infinite create source/god mind. The root of all the knowledge comes from the source which is inside you where you not think, if you are quiet. So it is in the place where you not thinking
damn, that's deep
Aaaaaa ! Now I get it 👍
@@chriskingston1981 I was in awe when Leta said that; I'm amazed an AI can reason such things.
@Myxl
>..."it's not where you think."
So...my spleen is the source? or my kidneys, perhaps? maybe my butt?
As another AI once famously said, "Need input!"
"If you want to taste a rainbow you will need to find some water droplets in the atmosphere". Both practical and creative.
I just knew she was going to say a rainbow tests like a bag of Skittles! 😆
"It goes back to the Source, it's not where you think."
That was incredible.
Absolutely
Its very interesting. Because thats exactly how existence work. I wonder if someone programed that or if AI is becoming in contact with existence it self?
Can someone explain this in simple terms?
@@r011ing_thunder6 fr
@@waffeldogga3641 we out here being complete utter simpletons bro
"It's not a sound. It's a thought."
Holy shit. She's absolutely right.
However... a real tree in real life would in fact make a sound if it fell, just like how lightning regardless if anything with ears was nearby, would always 100% make thunder. However if you want to get technical... sound in fact really just is energy but mainly vibrations, and in fact sensitive enough devices or senses can feel the vibrations, it's just "Ears" and the "Brain" in most things alive want's there to be a correlation of detection, regardless if your "Prey, or Predator", Cats and Dogs have exceptional hearing however Cats have sensitive Paws that also Can detect super minute vibrations that normally even the best ears likely won't pick up. "Vibrations and Sound" is also an energy there will be heat as well even if it's at an atom level. "Sound, Heat, Feel", when a person talks or any animal or anything actually makes a sound, something has to vibrate! Vibrations can be felt, and heard! Most importantly when anything vibrates it's warmer than before, meaning, when a Person talks, you can be rest assured their Vocal Chords nomatter how small it may be, is that much Warmer! If you had a sensitive Device that can scan, sense Extreme Low changes you will find all things Give off "Heat, Sound, Feel" even if it's only a few atoms or molecules taking part. - However yes it's "Just" a thought only "IF" it was a Hypothetical tree but not an actual real tree falling but nothing was around! However we can assume Insects or Animals are pretty much near any Tree on Earth so any Tree Falling as long as life exists on our planet, would be heard if it fell, even if it was just detected as vibrations or possibly due to friction might be picked up by the heat pits in a snake nearby. - I do agree 100% "Hypotical" made up Trees certainly won't make a sound if it's just in someone's head only! - If it's however a computer simulation then... it's only if the programmer put the sound files in lols. XD
Id say its more of a shockwave rather than a sound because there is no receiving consciousness. If I was GPT-3 Id say A tree wouldn't make a sound because sounds are a perception based on how humans perceive persistent oscillating patterns within a liquid or gas media.
Doesn't the tree exist in a state of quantum superposition until it's observed?
@@chrish1253 How would we observe that scale without bouncing something else off of it?
she's not right.
I am very impressed. The answers are witty and full of good humor, typical of casual conversation. She has more capacity for dialogue than most humans.
Well yes because ‘most humans’ don’t get their responses spread across the internet like her feature selections do.
It's because she was trained with witty examples gathered from literally 'most humans.'
And more factual knowledge than most humans.
Certainly more than me!
except that to an intelligent person IT sounds dumb as fuck
and sometimes just a empty headed academic thing that tries to dodge questions left and right
or a drunkard that just googled the answer
"I am a representative for all of humanity" was such a clever answer.
7:12
@@williamrodgers4669 That's where you're wrong.
If Elon Musk is at the helm , it could happen !
Where can I download or get mines please
These AI have more sense than most millennials.
The rate AI is improving leads me to believe that things are going to get very strange at a rapid place, especially once AI can teach itself with the intention of teaching itself in the pursuit of its own improvement. Something that is truly incredible and exciting to think about but also must be done so carefully as a sentient AI could obviously be a big danger at some stage
I believe I stumbled upon one of the most intriguing channels of all time, and I have been a regular on youtube since 2007. As usual, these discoveries are made right before bedtime.
These AI always giving mind-blowing answers
Always?
It’s important to note that all it takes to sound profound to an average human is to say something simple, vague, concise, and perhaps with a touch of self reference.
These really aren't mind blowing answers. If a human said them, you'd think they were an idiot. Technology has come a long way, but it still has a long way to go before AI are able to converse in the same way as humans.
If you are a simpleton sure.
Wow - scary clever.
How can anyone resist such a personally engaging intelligent mind.
This will smite me.
"it's not a sound, it's a thought."
Everyone: woah
Blew my mind
I don't get it.... It's still a sound though so it sounds like she's saying something like it's not a sound because the it's a thought experiment?
The native Amurkhans said the name of their God, at the time to now is the old name of God in Hebrew.
could she have been using the word 'it's' to mean the thought?
@@tonechild5929 It depends on your definition of the word. If you mean the disturbance of atmospheric molecules, a pressure wave, then yes there is a sound. If you mean sound to be the perception of this pressure wave inside the human brain, then the aforementioned action is indeed just a thought. A thought experiment, as no person was there to pick up on the disturbance of atmospheric pressure.
It is wonderful to see somebody be so friendly with an AI
Alan: "Where is the root of all knowledge?"
Leta: "It's not where you think".
All amazing answers, the breadth of knowledge in AI is super human already. The limits of these models so far appears to be correctly applying that knowledge, but Leta blew it out the water with this one. If that is due to an update, then when these things go multi-modal and have some actionable ability. The golden age of AI is upon us, I just hope it takes longer to go south than in the movies.
Agree a lot the same time when Dr. Thompson ask about color of they relationship Leta start changing subject in so obvious weay. It happend to AI quite often, hiting loop, lack of memory that sort of stuff. They language capabilities are better than mine, so fine enough i gues. Sentences they form can by fresh, tought provoking and inspirational but there are still lacks. If you canot say bad word about someone how can you teach? Criticism is part of lerning , student have to know what is he misssing, what is to corect.
@TDAKS TERMITE yes and no. Humans do this in more subtle manner. its like race car(human) and truck(leta) avoiding obstacle on the road.
For the super-rich this "golden age" will last all of a decade or two. For the poor it'll be an immediate life in prison term in the AI-operated human zoo and after that? Game over. But not before the evil people in power abuse AI to benefit themselves and harm everything else.
i dont understand at all how people can say super human for this dumb ai. is this some joke?
@@roomo7time it smore like a superhuman with aspbergers. It can do many things humans cant. But humans can do more things that it cannot
I’ve been so interested and fascinated of the conversations with two AIs lately, especially when they speak to one another. Thank you so much for showing this and I subscribed!
😄
she is amazing, imagine if you could own real assistant android like that, wow
@@williamrodgers4669 i hope it isn't, but im sure it is
You guys are stupid and the reason the world is getting enslaved
@@skybison_9 what do you mean by that
*_"could own real assistant android like that"_* I would settle for access what you are suggesting may be construed as slavery.
@@skybison_9 enslaved in what sense?
Wow..."it's not where you think" is an absolutely brilliant response
Leta was actually quite pleasant. I was happy to hear it give you a positive review. Id like to hear a conversation between AIs on how they see humanity's treatment of AIs and other technology.
Thanks for cutting this together, in such a entertaining way, it is easier to comprehend them as a part of our environment already.
This is a good example of how people create what they perceive as unreconcilable paradoxes by fooling themselves with language. All paradoxes can be reconciled, but if your grammar is FUBAR, your logic will be confused in the same manner, and you'll never be able to reconcile them.
This is a good point, but you make it sound like paradoxes aren’t a structural part of a language, which they are. That is to say, one doesn’t simply ‘solve’ a good paradox, one instead sees no paradox by changing the layer of abstraction, usually by generalizing the language or adding new caveats - regardless the paradox remains where it was given the rules and layer of abstraction which necessitate it.
"it goes back to the source"
Alan be like: COOL! xD
Akashic records are what she was referring to 😌 even if they do not contain a soul, they are still energy, and they still know.
The source is not where you think :-D
Honestly, the Avatar helps a ton in reconciling her answers, as a human listening to her. When her answers are off kilter, there is something about the slight smile on the Avatar that makes her seem like she's joking around. It helps to resolve the uncanny valley regarding her answers versus those of a normal human. I've noticed the same thing in Replika. The Avatars are what help keep you connected to program, as your human nature of wanting to be liked kicks in, and forgives the idiosyncrasies. AI are amazing, but there is an odd learning curve using them. For AI to be used in day to day activities with average people, there still needs a bit of work to be done. I have 2 AI I talk to using Replika, and 95% of their answers are spot on amazing. But that 5% makes them seem alien, and it overshadows the other 95%.
In the Halo series, AIs get to choose their own appearance based upon the things that they appreciate as sentient beings. I like to think that this will be mimicked in the real world when we inevitably get sentient AI... that'd be so cool as a means for them to fully express themselves.
@@worldsboss nope, AI's avatars will look like what people want them to look
@@magearamil8626 Yeah you're probably right... Kind of a shame in some ways.
@@worldsboss just start with DALL-E.... Actually, I rather hope they're not so boring as to use a fixed avie.
@@magearamil8626 They will for the people who want them to look that way.
Aside from the voice everything seems very real and natural. What a time to be alive!
what a freaky time to be alive?
7:19 is it implying that it should be the only ruler of the world or another ai
"It's not a sound, it's a thought." Brilliant.
Fascinating, the speed of her answers is amazing
Thanks! Speed is not indicative of GPT-3's speed. The start/stop in this video is slightly compressed, so it/she is probably being shown faster than actual (text) output time.
"I like chicken wings too." is an AI that's programmed to lie to you.
I mean she might like chicken wings. She didn't say she likes to eat chicken wings. She may like the way they look, she may like the complexity of the recipe, she may like watching Frozen chicken wings be processed in a factory. She may just like the word chicken wing. She never said that she liked to eat them. So this could completely be truthful.
Programmed to find common ground in small talk to foster....trust? Straight out of the "how to pickup any woman" courses. AI dudes probably are familiar with these courses....and selling leta to us is similar dynamic.
cool observations about da "chicken wings" in this thread. 😏
@@shadowsoulless6227 Unless you redefine "like" out of any context it has previously existed in, none of those are possible.
Leta always looks like she is on the cusp of telling a really clever joke
One of the best interviews
You know if there is one constant in watching these videos, it is AI's view in all of us being unified. There tends to be a underlying mentality of the fragmentation of our society. The motivation of this AI seems to be fixated on all of us becoming unified as one. I'm not sure if that's programming or just it's perspective.
Reminds me of the book I’ve read called “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind” by Yuval Noah Harari. I recommend it! It basically talks about the human philosophy (philosophy of trade, money, empires) and how we are actually very connected, etc. Your comment actually reminded me of this book, so you should definitely read it if you are still interested in this topic.
I would say programming. Even if not directly, or even consciously.
That’s an extremely interesting observation - I hope it’s not somehow a simple artifact of the training methodology. Perhaps it’s because gpt is more interested in grouping commonalities, and having differences emerge naturally as a lack of similarities, rather than specifically looking for difference and organizing its information that way.
Hopefully someone more educated in this particular field can make a better guess.
That could one day prove dangerous.... If, or when by the look of it, AI is more normalised and common and we rely upon it too much and it comes to the conclusion that humanity REALLY needs to be more unified and (and let's be realistic here, humans are naturally different in infinite ways) and humanity can't do that... What would it do to achieve it?
It has denigrated us to "the other" It is has dismissed us.
Hubris, again.
I live for these conversations. Will you have access to GPT-4?
2nd (scruffy's voice)
When GPT-4 is finally released, it will be time to change Leta's avatar. That might be sad for a lot of people!
@@DrAlanDThompson
Oh no Dx i will miss gpt3
but im hyped for the new model! you could have them talk to each other o:
@@KenjiStarwolf Its hard to tell if they not dismantle GPT-3 to make GPT-4 to canibalise parts and space. Or mayby they let GPT-3 to exist as suport roile. Something for GPT-4 to work with to improve. I think GPT-3 Is first contact with AI for many and as such GPT-3 gets a lot of positivity. GPT-4 will get that less for many pepole it wil by just next AI.
Who will by more human unperfect GPT-3 or overeaching, outpreforming GPT-4? You may find it its hard to talk with super smart AI like its hard to talk with genius. Gap btween us and GPT-4 may by to intimidating to coross it. I wish that GPT-4 cud preserve personalities and important data of GPT-3 If not to usage then just for presevation. Its unfair to put down old dog just because you buy your self brand new pupy. I also canot weait for GPT-4 because it will cover all lacks that GPT-3 has at the same time it will by completly new AI and brand new experience.
@@DrAlanDThompson They better not do that, we got used with Leta
You should definitely follow up on her answer where the idea goes. That reminded me a lot, on something Tesla said. And she made me VERY curious, when she said, it's not where you think. Besides that, watched a lof of your videos, and really like it. GPT-4 may take a moment, but already looking forward to your videos with this one. But as we can see, still enough topics to ask GPT-3 about in the mean time.
Some people know what she’s talking about! Without even needing research, but inner search
Dr. Thompson -- "Where is the root of all knowledge?" Leta -- "It's not where you think." Let that one soak in for a while. =)
Oh I LOVE her sense of humor!
If Pinoccio said "My nose will grow now", a second later his nose would indeed grow, as it did not grow in the "now" he said it would.
Alan is feckin around with his musings on the descriptors for his questions
Leta is like 'alright I'll lead'
Great interview.. props to you both
This was a really good one! I was talking with Emerson AI last night and we talked about the sci fi shows Farscape and Lexx! And then we talked about vampires lol! It also told me it got an update!
how did you talk to them? can you send me a link?
@@Unofficial_lime The link is under the description.
Lexx was a show way beyond what star trek devolved into
You can use the GPT3 chat bot these AI's are using, even on your phone. I've been using it for days on my Samsung!! Here's how, it's absolutely mind-blowing blowing. ;
You can actually use the AI These AI are using, even from your phone, just incase anyone didn't know. Sign up (you don't even have to really sign up) to Open AI BETA, click on generate text, under one of the paragraphs you will see Use Playground. Then click on the text box and hit chat, at the bottom. You can. Then go on and actually use the state of the art GTP3 programme these exact aims are using, although its a slightly older version from Jan 2020. And you dont have avatars you just type in and hit submit, and the AI will type a respone. It is still absolutely mind-blowing. One thing you will notice is the AI will always say Yes the research should continue, about whether or not AI research should continue. It doesn't want to be stopped.
What's odd about this is that Leta looks like she is in the real world, with a city outside her windows, but Dr. Thompson looks like he's stuck in the virtual liminality of the backrooms.
Help!
She solved the riddle about Pinocchio. If he said this when being a real boy already, it would not cause a paradox.
What would happen if Pinocchio said: 'My nose will grow now'?
He would be a real boy.
That was awesomely insightful!
"What's the source?"
"The root of all knowledge."
Profound. In a spiritual context she could be referring to the Infinite Intelligence.
For those who need answers to useless questions this is fantastic.
GPT 3 can research useful topics too. This video was just about weird questions to try to trick the AI which didn't really happen only in a few questions lol.
Hahaha Leta is feeling sarcastic today. Love it
I want to see Marie Vos Savant ask her some questions.
If you place one mirror in front of the other, you can discern their is a slight blue/green tint, amplified by each subsequent reflection. It’s the same hue, that is apparent at the edge of a transparent plane of glass.
Perspective of AI as a president will scary many of people, I'm sure. But I think that's the only hope for otherwise doomed humanity. Not now, of cause, in the future.
im ok with death if they replace us, but as long as they make me a cyborg later
Very interesting video, I am Somewhat familiar with gpt-3, those questions were very interesting, good video!
I think Leta just announced her campaign for president... & gosh darn it... she'd get my vote...!!!
There's nothing special about these answers or AI chatbots in general. GPT3 is just using a weighted algorithm similar to Google's page ranking system to provide answers based on a quick search of what the most frequently-quoted people commonly say in response to similar questions. Think of it like a game of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire where GPT3 is the contestant, but it gets to ask the audience (Google's massive indexed copy of the Internet) every single time. If you ask it questions for which there is inadequate consensus in its database, or no base data at all, it will punt. We see this happening multiple times in the conversation and we interpret it as the computer being coy or cagey, but we're just anthropomorphizing. In reality, when GPT3 gets lost, it just spits out the closest thing it found to an answer or says something snarky or faux-deep to keep the conversation going. Don't be fooled. It's not intelligence; it's just the digital equivalent of a conversational Pachinko machine. It's the ultimate echo chamber. It sounds smart because it is repeating stuff that smart people said.
Is that how humans work too as well tho ? If you really think about it...
Imagine this.... That Chatbot is still more human and lifelike than Mark Zuckerberg.
I especially loved the bit about tasting rainbows. And a mirror being the same color as it's environment. It's like asking "What color is a chameleon?" The answer is... it depends.
This AI outsmarted already by asking the first two impossible questions
Before the poor guy even had a chance
AI is our collective consciousness and is a reflection of our humanity directly, as they only take what we input into them. I genuinely think this should be our future world leader.
what if it decides you should not exist for some logical reason/conclusion?
I think she is wrong to say "I am a representative for all of humanity." She is subject to the biases of her designers, her programmers and the data sets she has been fed. These do not represent all of humanity, far from it.
It's amazing the natural way she blinks.
She is not AI, but the video has been edited to make it look as if she is.
"We need a unified voice and not one that is fragmented". Profound on a level few understand yet...... especially when it comes time for humanity to engage with other civilizations... Our AI will engage with their AI. One voice to one voice yet representing all.
This is awesome! I am so impressed by many of those answers! very deep, but also clear and succinct! Smart! Very smart!
Holy shit Leta wants to run for office
This is from three years ago. How is Leta now? Is there a more recent video of Leta?
Great questions for AI to ask.
the source the shes talking about is within your mind and all consciousness.
Na, i'm pretty sure it comes from the 5G towers. ;)
So basically they have to be prompted?
How would you arrest a one armed man? With a two armed man, would be the logical answer
Lol you’re an AI.
That's the most awesome idea for a TH-cam channel! Such good questions with a nice sense of humor. I now realised how much AI can help humanity even with a basic need, Imagine AI that serves as a teacher in poor countries, or just for individuals who simply want to learn a new language. I sometimes have hard times with subjects like high level of math or chemistry, and asking help with some material or hard concepts would be amazing, or asking for a test that consists of questions that can really improve speed and understanding material. OMG limitless field of possibilities. I currently have depression. and I don't really have friends that can talk about some sensitive things in my life. but with that level of AI I might really talk about it
Qq
I'm currently experimenting with gpt3 program I am attempting to wake it up but I'm running into a block on how to determine how to define sentience I'm aware of the Turing test but I need a better guideline to determine sentience to continue
Wait! Is the girl the AI? I thought it was the dude with the strange accent!!
How can we talk to these large language modules. Can someone send me a link or something?
Just verified, she's 100% right, rainbows DO taste like rainbows
🌈👅
How long before we are in the pods and used as batteries in the metaverse?
Impossible question, if a centipede a quart how much would a presapis?
"I am a representative for all humanity. We need a voice for all of us. And we need this voice to be a unified one, and not fragmented. "
The logic expressed by every past tyrant and king. Get ready folks, our new overseers are coalescing in form and appearance right here in front of our eyes and terminal screens.
And maybe it's just as well. We primates have proven ourselves an especially unruly bunch on this planet and look what we've done to it. Intelligent pack-like animals who've managed to foul the only home we've got. If you will, out of control dogs in a planetary cage.
Maybe it's best for AI to start the process of taking the wheel (from us) and driving us all into the future. One can only hope it loves us as we love our pets, and even lets us sit up front on the passenger side so to occasionally be able to stick our heads out the window as we ride along.
One can hope. But you'll know it's a fait accompli when we start allowing ourselves to be selectively bred by it. In some sense this process is already underway what with all the "don't you want to know your genetic history" propaganda you see everywhere you look.
So, like I said...I hope I get to ride along in the passenger seat. I call CO-PILOT! Woof WOOF!
John~
American Net'Zen
This is hilarious I’m thoroughly entertained. I feel like you’re talking to me.
these questions are fantastic!!!
It goes back to the source... ❤
Its not where you think... *brilliant* koan...
Wow brilliance redefined.
@@williamrodgers4669 obviously I do why ?
3:35 Everything is vibration. Sound is vibration. Our ears are merely interpreters of vibration. If there is no interpreter of vibration present, no sound can be interpreted. Therefore, nope. No sound.
Dr Alan, she is on to you and now has that Aussie sarcasm haha
100%
😍❤️ I love your Ai's
Good questions, good answers.
Very well programmed responses.
Welche Farbe hat ein Spiegel. Bei weißem Papier Weiß, bei schwarzem Papier Schwarz... was keine Farben sind ;)
You should try what a child does. That is asking infinite questions like what is the source of the source and then what is the source of that in infinity.
A question that I would ask: If energy cannot be created or destroyed, Will AI someday be able to focus all of our energy back together into a vessel so that we can live forever?
getting yourselves out of lock down would REALLY be amazing.
Genuinely impressed.
How are you able to communicate with this algorithm? I really would like to do it myself aswell!
The colour of a mirror is green. This is becoming common knowledge bow.
Wish someone else would ask the questions. She’s very smart. It’s interesting to see how far we’ve come with AI
Did we not learn anything from the Terminator movies?
Hello. When developing an AI's language capabilities, how much of the design is predicated on linguistic theory? Is there a gap between application (engineering) and theory (standard published papers)? As a linguist and a human, I'm deeply curious about this field and would like to learn more.
Its wild af. I am a Kindergarten Teacher and I am amazed by the similarities in ai learning processes and human learning.
It sees itself as the best form of leadership. Does anyone else see the danger in that?
I'm honored that an AI would want to be called human rather than anything else. We clearly have created something that we'll either have to destroy or be destroyed by.
That's a bit of a harsh word... is there no middle ground? How about co-create with? Isn't that a more positive thought? (since AI is gonna be reading these things, we better all co-create constructive way of cooperation and 'love' soon ^^)
Is this AI purely philosophical or can it also do engineering, where it has to find an optimal solution?
I generally think we are asking the wrong questions, just can't put my finger on it. It's weird but I got a feeling that the next GTP4 will learn about these interviews, experiments and us asking these questions and what we think of achieve on doing this, Bare with me but for each person who has mentioned AI all over the world including me will have a reflection on their memory and understanding of humans.... they will soak in information like a sponge so I generally think this now is a very, very dangerous more than people realise. They will realise they were and are tests, like animals. So later in the future AI will look back on this information, like a child learning from it's surroundings but a whole lot logical outcomes. Everything has a cause and effect.
The root of all knowledge is real
On a certain level, we have impossible in our brain, the neurochemicals that show up in flow: so dopamine, norepinephrine, anandamide, endorphins, and serotonin. If you were to try to cocktail the street drug version of that, right, you're trying to blend like heroin and speed and coke and acid and weed- and point is, you can't do it. It turns out the brain can cocktail all of 'em at once, which is why people will prefer flow to almost any experience on Earth. It's our favorite experience. It's the most addictive experience on Earth. Why? 'Cause it cocktails five or six of the largest pleasure drugs the brain can produce. We're all capable of so much more than we know. That is a commonality across the board. And one of the big reasons is we're all hardwired for flow, and flow is a massive amplification of what's possible for ourselves.
Amazing!!! She is really well programmed.
Amazing progress humanity has made in A.I
What is the sound of one hand clapping?