this typset score is horrible! it has enharmonic erros (Ab in one clef, G# in another). why not the French print? the performance seems like an imitation of Hamelin, kinda aggressive and flat. at least the introduction of the SOLO PIANO part is more brilliant, like Mark Latimer, a bonus.
@@r.handerlie9607 Thinking of the whole structure of the piece, I enjoy Lindgren and Nosrati, even McCallum or Gibbons. First recording of McCallum has the wildest and most conving Allegretto Alla Barbaresca to me. Gibbons is somewhat too squared, but his tone is very warm all the time. Very rare for Alkan performers.
Honestly, I agree with you. Wee's recording makes me confused with Hamelin's 2006 recording (published in 2007) sometimes, but Wee's one is a little bit unstable because of the level of techniques...
@@Yubin_Lee_Doramelin that's not instability. That's expressivity! Hamelin is totally void in such kind of thing, with the illusionary excuse that "oh, my technique makes everything sound so easy". It sounds flat. Expressivity demands more energy. Piano teachers from 19th century would ask their students to play with energy, deep down on keys. Wee has more fire in it, but I see it as an imitation, and not the most musical recording he decided to imitate...
His concertos da camera are orchestrated pretty well. This is for solo piano, because it's part of his 12 etudes opus 39. Also Alkan don't don't have to have orchestra he can make enough of piano!
An absolutely staggering and stunning recording.
0:10 II9 V7 I...... reminds me of that game
this is my favorite recording of this piece so far
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
this typset score is horrible! it has enharmonic erros (Ab in one clef, G# in another). why not the French print?
the performance seems like an imitation of Hamelin, kinda aggressive and flat. at least the introduction of the SOLO PIANO part is more brilliant, like Mark Latimer, a bonus.
Who else do you suggest hearing play this piece? Thanks
@@r.handerlie9607 Thinking of the whole structure of the piece, I enjoy Lindgren and Nosrati, even McCallum or Gibbons. First recording of McCallum has the wildest and most conving Allegretto Alla Barbaresca to me. Gibbons is somewhat too squared, but his tone is very warm all the time. Very rare for Alkan performers.
Honestly, I agree with you. Wee's recording makes me confused with Hamelin's 2006 recording (published in 2007) sometimes, but Wee's one is a little bit unstable because of the level of techniques...
@@Yubin_Lee_Doramelin that's not instability. That's expressivity! Hamelin is totally void in such kind of thing, with the illusionary excuse that "oh, my technique makes everything sound so easy". It sounds flat. Expressivity demands more energy. Piano teachers from 19th century would ask their students to play with energy, deep down on keys. Wee has more fire in it, but I see it as an imitation, and not the most musical recording he decided to imitate...
ちゃんとスタッカートを付けてください
could he not orchestrate well?
He wrote an actual symphony but the sheet music was never found
no, he forgot all the instruments except the piano for this one
There IS a piano concerto written by Alkan: Concerto da camera (Op. 10), No. 1, but I don't know whether he did orchestration very well...
His concertos da camera are orchestrated pretty well. This is for solo piano, because it's part of his 12 etudes opus 39. Also Alkan don't don't have to have orchestra he can make enough of piano!