Russia Destroys Unique Abrams Hybrid at the Battlefield's Edge
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ค. 2024
- On February 24, 2024, a significant event unfolded on the battlefield when the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported the destruction of a rare piece of American-supplied military machinery resembling the M1 Abrams tank. This unique vehicle, known as the M1150, held vital strategic importance not only for Ukraine but also for the United States. Surprisingly, it was destroyed by a T-72B3 tank with its first shot during a skirmish, which highlights the unexpected turn of events in modern warfare.
The incident occurred approximately a kilometer away from the main battle, near the tranquil village of Petrovske, as observed by experts from a Russian think-tank, Rybar. Their findings raised questions about Ukraine's lack of backup to protect such a valuable asset in close proximity to the battleground. This event compounded the confirmation of three destroyed M1 tanks, with two specifically identified in the Avdiivka region.
Curious to explore the details surrounding this unexpected event? Join us in this episode as we delve deeper into it!
Before diving into the event, let's first examine the technical specifications of both vehicles involved. Were they evenly matched?
Source:
drawingdatabase.com/m1-abrams/
By Vitaly V. Kuzmin - www.vitalykuzmin.net/Military/..., CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
"T-72B3" (skfb.ly/oONMM) by Cloostyyyk is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommons.org/licenses/b....
"M1150 ABV" (skfb.ly/6YLsE) by Kalibrovshik is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (creativecommons.org/licenses/b....
By Smell U Later - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Man, those Russian shovels are something else.
the most important thing is that everything American is more expensive, which does not mean that it is good. Look at the headlines. The most expensive aircraft carrier, destroyer, tank, space program. .Should I laugh or cry that I can't afford such toys?
Because it's the best.....and the losses on both sides prove it...
@@jameskessell1977 Very logical and truly explained. We have a new genius! Don't make me laugh because I'm angry.
anti tank guided shovels
@@jacekmandaryna7629 Perhaps they're expensive because they can actually survive a shot or two, rather than needing to be cheap for mega mass production
*Peace is a lot cheaper than War.*
If it wasn't for War Research during Active Combat we wouldn't have the iPhone or microwave or many of those Essentials we rely on daily, never thinking they were born of blood as are we all.
War makes rich people richer and poor people poorer, that's why they always prefer war over peace.
Where's the profit in that? Besides they are already doing it on the cheap they have a proxy doing all the fighting while you get rid of all the old stock and replace it with new stock. You don't need expensive de-commission of mutations.
No true !
war is the engine for human development.....war is human...war is nature
If you want to see this Engineering vehicle up close go to Moscow
No thank u, im not setting my foot in that crap country
No, it’s not Russian so it goes with all the other captured vehicles
@@Donkeymaster9000Exactly, all the other captured vehicles are displayed in Moscow during parades and crap because Russia thinks it's so impressive.
@@RadiantCataclysm It's a message to some Americans with man-child syndrome who never been in the military and think that the Abrams is Invincible
It's just like every other tank A COFFIN ON TRACKS
@@RadiantCataclysm It works
Russo ukraine war has shattered image of us weapons
And hundreds of Russian tank losses mean that russia is stronger than ever? Bias
Nope that would be the other way around. Russian weapons are getting annihilated everywhere.
Wrong. Other way around.
@Theinitedstatesofamerics12345 Russia build cheap tanks and win wars. US build expansive tanks that can't win a single war😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@liongordel9088 Last time you used this tactic you had America's help to win a war.
You went to Iran and lost badly, where as we went, did whatever we could, and then left while sustaining less casualties than the attack on our country that sent us over there in the first place.
Maybe speak up when the last war you won wasn't because of help from America, using Ukraine made T-34s, to attack the germans after they betrayed Russia.
How did they betray Russia? Oh right, because the plan was to take Europe and split it between the two. That's why Russia helped them invade Poland.
Cutting edge😂 Spectacular armour destroyed by single shot😂😂😂
not completely sure but since this is an engineering vehicle it probably had some armor removed to weigh less, despite that the abrams hull is very weak though.
We'd all be far more impressed if it faced an actually armed, armored, and properly crewed abrams, not a glorified bulldozer with advanced clearing capabilities
@@user-fe7bo5mm1o dek minig tanks has the b3st and most armoir of all
russia will definitely win the war. theyre even converting their tank turrets into drones
and even then, it’s armor is only useful on the front. The aromor on the sides and back could easily be pierced by a late war ww2 panzer 4. It makes perfect sense that it could be destroyed in one shot. From the side or back.
😂 😂 😂 You said Abrahams engine Preferably, it shines at night 2000celisus,
Yeah because it is a gas turbine engine.
@@tugbars4690 which drinks a lot of fuel.
This Summer Moscow is the Destination for Tourists to see Abrams first time closer before it ends in museum
That is the Museum!
Surely the Abrams can handle a few winters if Moscow Weather....
Like Tigres and Panthers of the past ,soon the only place to find the namesake of hybrid "general" Abrams will be a museum
There no tourists in Moscow anymore. Just the odd journalists
USA reached a point where they're comparing their modern weapons to Soviet Era machinery. Yikes
No there is no modern weapons being sent to Ukraine if you was from the west you would know that. Granted it’s superior but not modern .
Are Russians really that desperate for a win they rejoice when they take out an engineering vehicle?
The things they called 'game changer' all turn out to be victims of drones, low cost drones.
Hybrid? It's so nice they make eco-friendly tanks
aren't they actually making electric/hybrid tanks lol
@@user-fe7bo5mm1o, Tesla technology I guess - the supersecret American tanks draw the energy from the ground ! Minor problem though - that has to be the US soil, not the humus ferilized by the rotting bodies of the Ukrainian soldiers. 😮😢
Funded by tax payers not the marine corp.
???????
It's like shooting an armoured tractor.
what kinda question is "were they evenly matched?" shit doesnt even have a gun
Dude, this is USA propaganda, just prepair your popcorns and enjoy the circus.
Another piece of well made us garbage destroyd from a much older tank
Dude brings a shovel to a gun fight!
"Smooth bore" gun fight of all things.
That shovel apparently destroyed the best tank in the west 😂
So basically it was a long range confrontation between a russian tank and an heavily armored sitting duck. Impressive.
Abrams is more technologically advanced than the T72? Are you talking about the same Abrams that is loaded by a person specially designated for this? Is that why you forbid Abrams to operate on the front line in Ukraine - because you are afraid of throwing the Russians into shock with the technological superiority of Abrams? Stop these jokes.
😂😅 даа хоть кто то умный оказался и засомневался что заряжающий афроамериканец джо , или ганц современнее автомата или механизма заряжания!!!!! 😂😂😅😅😅
Free Discussion - Don't Like, Don't Look.
Back to your Fascist Asylum for Your Meds.
I don't know why Russia is getting all hyped over old Abram tanks from desert storm that has none of America's advanced armour on it
Abrams was designed to have an autoloader, but the reason why it still has a manual loader is because they wanted to keep the firing rate high and easier to change from APFSDS round to HE round.
The autoloader of T-72 has 6 seconds to load, while Abrams with its manual loader only needs 3 or 2 seconds and that's a lot of difference. Tanks with autoloaders are also more narrow, making the crew less flexible.
However, the autoloader if designed correctly can be more advantageous. The Japanese Type 10 autoloader is as fast as the Abrams manual loader or half of the T-72 autoloader. Unlike Abrams, the Type 10 can maintain its reloading speed as the Abrams loader can get exhausted, reducing the reloading time.
Abrams is a load of crap that is not designed for Ukraine now Russian tanks are a different breed. They are cheap as any thinking military strategist should be thinking of mass production in a time of war instead of Hollywood nonsense which looses wars😂😂😂😂😂😂
Nothing is invincible
What a waste of our tax money. I want a refund.
Why did the video just stop? No proper ending.
Actually, this vehicle was destroyed by a Kornet anti-tank missile. Russia just claims it was destroyed by a T-72.
source?
@@limon8148source is don't believe in Russian propaganda
@@limon8148 any search engine
T72's can shoot atgm's
The Abrams variant had no turret or main gun. It is not a tank
Works for me
you are correct, it is an engineer vehicle with tank chassis. but given that it is engineering vehicle it makes it a prized asset for troops that would otherwise use it for mine clearing or making entrenchments
fr why do they count this as a tank kill it doesn't even have a gun to defend itself
Bold Ukrainian Soldiers Defect To Russia, Joining The Frontline Battle Against Ukraine!
@@user-fe7bo5mm1o if they were to categorise it, then it would then be put in the advanced engineering vehicle category, which actually makes it look like an even bigger tactical victory
When faced with a superior army Ukrainians and their western allies are just no match.
When faced with a real Army Ukrainians and their western allies are just no match.
Meanwhile a war that would last no longer than 2 weeks according to putin, has taken over 2 years
the offensive has been stalling out for 2 years and tankies pretend like ukraine has already long surrendered
T-72 👍
Yeah that's what their jack in the box turrets do every time. 😂
The abrams tank with a massive guzzling jet engine for propulsion and a huge infra-red footprint . Give me a break. Bradley's are just miles more effective in comparison than this stupid Jetson-designed abrams junk.
Avoid that. It obvious from pics Abrams had no junk whatsoever.
Usually America has control of supply lines, so thats not a massive problem
keep it up Russia
Why compare 2 totally different vehicles.....
Because it’s fun.
@@MothaLuva but these 2 tanks aren't ment for the same role. One is a shovel and the other is a tank.
@@JsphCrrll The one is a Tank the other a victim. Wrong place, wrong time. This is war not a online game.
@@JsphCrrllAmerican shovel against Russian shovel, Russian shovel the winner!!!
Yeah, drones are turning tanks into mobile artillery. They can’t go out in the open like they did in Dessert Storm.
Bradleys are taking up much of that role now. Doesnt have the firepower but much more maneuverable. Plus it transports troops.
"Dessert storm"
lol, icecream tanks
@@Randomstuffs261 lol back at you. The M1 is the best tank in the world. If it is vulnerable, they all are.
@@mikebuck1897 I agree honestly, but dessert storm sounds delicious for all tanks
Tanks will take losses 📉. Tactics matter & the skill if tank crews. M1150 is not a tank. It's use is yo clear mine fields and obstacles.
The fact it was taken out on an initial shot will happen especially if Ukraine 🇺🇦 failed to use proper tactics to protect special assets
Also doubtful Ukraine got best US tanks with armor
The Bradleys used in forward fighting positions have much more anti tank firepower than tanks do, anti tank missiles, which are more powerful than any modern apfsds round.
So, a "cold war relic" one shot takes out a modern US tank with Chobham and reactive armour! The US has not dared pit their depleted uranium armour against Russian firepower in case it too is shown up to be next to worthless.
It was not an even match, not even close. However, RU has already proven its capabilities, OTAN has not.
Yeah right😂 go back to sleep orc.
@@tommygun5038someone an expert huh? Make sure you won’t die from obesity 🤣
@@ArtF795 .....You clowns just grasp at anything. Whoop whoop a few Basic Abrams tanks were destroyed. Look at the Orcs squealing.
@@ArtF795Maybe talk it up when you actually face a modern tank. Not a 20 year old one.
I used to tinker around on these.
Nothing to see here, the tank that gets the first shot in usually wins. Irrespective of their country of origin.
Why unique Abrams Hybrid. From the pics, and the 33th degree conferred, C. Abrams too was one.
It's not about production costs. There are 5k or more Abrams m1a1 m1a2
Hell it didn’t even have a gun it needed backup not a stand alone vehicle
How much does each weapon system cost I wonder?
Yes, but does the M1150 have the same armor as an M1? Not necessarily.
A mine clearing plough,relatively easy to get into a kill zone and destroy.
Now that's a big boy
One is more a bulldozer with a machine gun the T72 is a tank with a cannon capable of firing missiles
Your tune seems to be changing Mr military tv…. 👀
No gun... Must be trans tank... :D :D :D
I'm dead :D
Like his "mother" Creighton
the abrams isnt the big deal people think it is
that was a CEV, not a tank
@@sasin2715on a tank chasis
@@kanestalin7246 so the TOS-1 is a main battle tank?
@@sasin2715 it is on a tank chasis
the t 72 may have used a piercing shell maybe idk
Considering ukraine was unable to clear minefields in its summer ofensive last year and pretty well lost the last role of the dice the loss of a specialist mine clearing vehicle is a disaster.
ussia unleased the power of the Soviet' Union""
Where was it's big brother Abram to protect it ???? ..... oh that's right..!!!! haha....
you didnt think this weapon could be destroyed way its basicaly unarmed
You shouldn't compare a deminer vs MBT. The question "were they evenly match?" should not be ask. Perhaps MBT vs MBT is an appropriate comparison or deminer vs deminer for that matter.
The Breacher is well armed against another Breachers Armament: 50 cal machine gun.
But not against a roaming T-72, or even a $500- FPV
A bit different outcome now the adversary can shoot back.
Shovels
M1-150 is in not a battle tank like M1-Abram that has 120 mm gun. M1-150 is designed for clearing mines and explosives
tankies will really ignore the thousands of destroyed T series tanks and pretend like the war was a massive success once a single abrams with no gun gets blown up
It's great for Russian propaganda. Makes it seem like russian equipment is better.
But they don't show their people what happens to a t90 when hit by a javelin. Himars destroying s400, stingers taking down helis, Bradley smoking up infantry, ifv, apc, and tanks.
@@zombacalipse 😂😂😂😂
@@patropata260 comeback?
@@patropata260 i got all the video evidence for my statements. Or you can just search it up
Und was hat ihm das genützt ?
Anyone can look up: "...we brokered a deal to transition power in Ukraine."
If true, getting clumsy.
All of this is arm chair trivia
LMAO, that's all you have of imagery?
Ima put that engine in my Miata 👹
Already did. Not worth the money and effort!
you want a gas turbine in your miata?
@@user-fe7bo5mm1o im obviously joking you hallow head 😭
On swampy ground they are useless
my prediction : this destroyed Abrams Hybrid will brings and preserved into Moscow Museum of captured NATO weapons just like his friends (Abrams and Leopard)
Why you didn't employ 9000 hp rail engine in your tanks they will give enormous power on battlefield.
ukrainian Abrahams not American? see this analyst
Abrams is a prehistoric animal... certainly not a tank.
That is In the real world, average Russian people fight in battle field with that old weapon VS me inside super hi-tech war machines... Praying for you, your nation not declared war with Russian.
ABVs are less armored. None of the uke Abrams have chobham armor either. Shooting something that can't shoot back isn't that impressive
May 21, Raf continues inflicting damage on enemy concentrations of manpower & equipment
kornet will easily kaput it
The image of the insiident is Ai generated not real one
Good.
'a unique M1 Abrams', I wouldn't really call it unique, it's just an engineering tank, and while it is still very armored, it's not meant for fighting. The fact that it uses the M1 Abram chassis is more the fact that it's readily available so it can be more easily repaired. There is nothing surprising about it being destroyed in a single shot from a near-peer MBT, mainly because the M1150 doesn't have the same kind of armor package, it was built to withstand IED and landmines exploding in front of it, not a direct shot. Aside from that, there is a reason it's a retired platform even by the Marines now, in 2019 it was determined to stop using them and in 2023 they were completely and subsequently approved for sale to other countries like Australia, which means it won't have the depleted uranium making it's chobham armor far less effective.
There is nothing surprising about an engineering vehicle being taken out by direct tank fire, it just means it was out of position likely because Ukraine is being given tools they don't know how to use. Meanwhile Russia is trying to brag about taking out an Abrams but it doesn't even have a gun lol
Who’s bragging
@@amacca2085the Soviets clearly
True, but the others "normal" M1 had a same fate...
@@torukmahtomahto409 Not the same fate. They lasted much more, and were used in more forward positions, with Russian anti tank crews most likely specifically looking out for them. Plus, even the strongest armor still has weak points.
Ukraine Tankers are not really verse in fighting tanks period. This war is not armor on armor more less drones. But Ukraine tactics dont fit western doctrine. Simply put you have a engineer tank out clearing a road by its self. You just set yourself up for failure. Every single M1 was taken out by its self no support. Its a Tank not a space ship.
Its always three layers before you move on a objective or prep your battle space. The lepards and M1SA and bradley are interneworkable so use them as such.
Use your drones to fix your enemy push up your assets communication is key eyes in the sky and on the ground. One more problem is ukraine has little experiance on fixing the emeny and adapting to ground conflict. They are doing fine holding off russia because the use of drones and russia old way of fighiting.
Ukraine needs to learn more ground manuvers and communication. Its a team of assets and cross talk. command and control thats where ukraine is lacking. I wish I could sighn up to be a platoon SGT I only need 4 tanks and two bradlys
hard shovels!
Really interesing to know if normal people understand the shovel comments or even the washing machine comments.....😄
Kreosan Channel experiments - they're biking around Plesetsk Test Site on 2 stroke Chinese gas motors
Have you even seen the Microwave Rifle?
Urban Exploration at its Best
CHANGER GAME , LIKE THEY USE TO SAY😅😅😅😅😅👍
M1150 ABV (Assault breaching Vehicle) M1A1 hull and same Honeywell AGT1500 gas turbine engine. A better title would have been 'Russian T-72B3M destroys M1150 ABV'
M1150 ABV Assault breached Vehicle
American money 💰 is well invested in Ukraine cornfield
let the cope commence
Watch from 4:33, rest is intro
Who is this Russian Quisling behind this channel? All this is fake, that T-72 was a bunny kicking a Wolfhound 😂
Bad news😢😢😢
All Tank can be destroyed, Ukraine have Abrams basic as when you go buy a car and you need pay for A/C AND A MINIMAL OPTIONS
❤️🌹🇷🇺✌️♥️🙏🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 Glorye to Russia 🇷🇺 Glorye to Mr preș Putin ♥️ Glorie armatei sovietice de eliberare 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🙏🙏✌️✌️🌹🌹❤️❤️
Send in the challys I say
When you're agressive like US, you have to be the stronger. If not, you sink under the level of joke. Yankees have a special habilitation for ridiculous way.
You should be looking into if that was a Russian tank being hit. The crew would not be getting out and surviving. That is a huge difference.
Less loss compared to Russian tanks
Exactly. The Russkies have lost over 3,000 tanks.
These tanks got to the battlefield a few weeks ago and they are already removing them out of the front line and already few have been taken out images if they were from the start of this war what would be the numbers
U better get your facts right, cause the tanks has been on the frontlines for more than a few weeks. AND they are not being removed from the frontline LOL, Ukraine has already said they are not removing them, and have not removed them. Some more Russian propaganda from u kinda ppl i guess. 4-5/31+ abrams has been taken out, and thats on servial months dude. In the pace they are loosing them atm, its gonna take them 2-3 years to lose every single abrams. Meanwhile, Russian t80´s and T90´s and T72´s are knocked out daily lol. This is not a freaking abrams main battle tank however, this is a deminer built on the abrams chassi. U cant really compare that to a real abrams tank, this vechicle had a 50 cal only lol, SO its not a fucking tank. As usual however, u ppl that seem to side on the russian side of things dont seem to understand what u are even watching lol. U can literally tell from 1 second in to the video that its not a abrams main battle tank
Russians would be specifically targeting U.S. equipment, probably has a kill order that any anti tank crews take out any U.S. equipment they see.
you love to knock on us stuff huh?
They probly down to the last 20 now it must be why there getting pulled from the front lines
Il brûle très bien ce cerceuil roulant à chenilles américain. 😂
Waste of tax money
This A1 Abrams tank looks very strong and they are proud out of it , but unfortunately on the fields is not performing according to their expectations......VIVA RUSSIA
All Tank can be destroyed, Ukraine have Abrams basic as when you go buy a car and you need pay for A/C AND A MINIMAL OPTIONS .
5:59 and Abrams losed without good protection..Despite all the blows taken the carcass was still together. He was stopped but it was enough with a hit to the track, but the structure itself resisted lancet drones tank hit, fire and ALL .. turret was on tank. Tank arent disintegrate
How can you even compare these 2 tanks? It doesn't even have the armor that is on the main Abrams tank.
@BriwnLadd : Massive amounts of Copium
No it did not it was a mine sweeper basically a tank with no gun and a plow stuck to the front nothing secret just an old Abrams with anything advanced or secret been removed like all us tanks sent to Ukraine
OH what bullshit
Guys,l think Russian is coming more power
❤️❤️❤️❤️🇷🇺
Holy misinformation batman. It's literally a mine clearing vehicle. There is nothing super secret special about it, it barely even has any real armor on it.
Dude it’s literally an Abraham tank without its cannon and some added features. We seen them in action in Iraq
@@nate_reatczAnd if you can remove a gun from a tank, you can remove the reactive armor.
Abraham's or not, armor or not, it is not a direct combat vehicle in the configuration it's in.
@@nate_reatcz It's not literally a Abrams, it doesn't have anything a Abrams has, it's just built on the same basic body. It doesn't have the armor, the fire control, cannon, none of it. The "added features" are what? Oh right mine clearing tools. There is nothing special or secret about it. Stop with the misinformation.
@@Cameron0214so why is it heavier than the normal Abrams without the armor
@@kanestalin7246 its not... a simple Google search would show you this. They are almost 1.6 tons lighter than early models of the Abrams. Just Google M1150 Assault breaches, this convo is stupid when everyone can see the shit for themselves with a simple google search. Stop spreading misinformation.
Abrams lost by the AFU: 3~7
Abrams lost by the RF: 0
Sounds like a dumb comparison, isn't it? Just like comparing abrams losses to T-80 or other T series tanks, which have been deployed in way more numbers, for way longer, and are used by both sides.
Copium Covers a Multitude of Errors
Like Bondo for War
"vital, strategic importance" like you're comparing to to a b-2 stealth bomber.
it's a mine-clearing vehicle, a tank with a large plow on the front. that's it.
I also highly doubt it was destroyed on the first shot. That's some RU propaganda shit.