I don't like the fact that Polaroid after abandoning the instant film market for many, many years are going after FujiFilm for their new Square instax in a lawsuit. The FujiFilm might be a tad bit smaller but is way better looking in the contrast of the film.
The thing is, Polaroid hasn't been the Polaroid it used to be. Some guy who later went to jail bought them, and stopped the instant film production. He is not even working with Polaroid anymore. The thing is, Impossible has been using the format under license all these years, and even now, technically, Polaroid Originals is different from Polaroid. They both belong to the same family, but the film is still "manufactured, distributed, and sold by Impossible." Check out the film packaging! Here is the deal: the instant film square format with those proportions is Polaroid intellectual property, and it's natural they want royalties. It's actually Fujifilm who took things to court, and I find it funny how a big company like Fuji wants another company to simply give away their patents. Yes, Polaroid itself hasn't been making instant film, but its owners BOUGHT the intellectual property and the patents, and Impossible has been paying them, too. So why should a huge company like Fuji not pay?
And really, there is no need to defend Fuji. They are a huge company, they did nothing to save the Polaroid format back in the day. They just hoped it would die, most likely. They discontinued peel-apart/packfilm even though there are clearly many photographers who want it. They refused to sell the equipment as well. Their Instax Mini or Square film is actually not cheaper than the PO i-Type film if you think of how much image you get. Yes, it's more reliable, and the Wide film is much cheaper. But considering how big they are, they shouldn't have discontinued packfilm and they should be able to offer lower prices of Instax. Polaroid Originals is making ONE camera at the moment. Fuji has about a dozen Instax cameras/printers. Most people call them Polaroids, anyway, and now Fuji has come out with a square format just when Impossible was rebranding itself? Please!!!
UniHumour way to hype up a company that is doing nothing more than a cash grab on the back of the Polaroid name. It is nothing more than the same crap film that Impossible has been peddling. Selling Used Polaroid camera at 10x the price of their worth. I don’t care what you have to say about FujiFilm, their cameras are affordably priced and they have advanced the technology far beyond Impossible. 1:1 film format is not a new thing. Even for Polaroid film. FujiFilm is far from a huge company. People will expect to be getting the same film Polaroid made a long time ago but the truth is Impossible will never get back the IQ it used to have for the simple fact that government regulation on the chemicals they used. Instax is not the same chemical technology and how it is applied even though it appears to be. Simple fact is instax film is better and cheaper. Impossible is banging on the chance to cash grab on the name alone of Polaroid. If they was smart they would stick to advancing there zinc cameras and cube cameras.
In this instance, the intellectual property being infringed by Fujifilm is a trademark, the iconic Polaroid logo (a square picture area off-center in a larger rectangle, leaving one white border larger than the other), not a patent.
FujiFilm made $1.2 billion in profits (not revenue) last year, so I'd say they are reasonably big. While the impossible project to my knowledge never even made more than $10 Million in profit (not revenue). Fuji sees Polaroid reassembling, after one scam artist sank the entire ship, and want to keep their share of the instant photography market. When they were asked to pay for the IP they were using they ran to court with an argument that basically amounts to "We are making a shit-ton of money right now, we don't want that to change. So we fear that PO is going to be successful or even worse that we'll have to share for using their IP."
You're soooo right about the viewfinder! My photos always looked odd - not like I framed them - and it all makes sense now! I'm still getting used to this camera; I haven't really mastered the exposure yet. Sometimes they come out way underexposed, and then sometimes they're just white. I think I need to practise some more!
I did have the good fortune of owning and shooting a Polaroid SLR 680 years and years ago. After the SX70 film went the way of the dodo, I sold it for a good bit of change. What a piece of machinery. We shall never see anything like it again. I guess it would like comparing a Linn Sondek to a Crosley Cruiser. They can both play records, but you'll NEVER mistake one for the other. Great Video, Joey, as always.
Nice one Joey, loved your video but would have really appreciated it if you would have corrected the exposure settings and viewfinder compensation during your shoot so we could have seen your adjusted exposures.
Dude that's my hometown! It took me a while to recognize it in the beginning but I immediately knew from the store fronts when the bus came in. This camera seems pretty awesome I just don't know about the price honestly.
I've shot about 6 boxes so far and gotten pretty mixed results. There is definitely a learning curve to how this camera meters, the distances it's sharpest, and especially the viewing through the finder. It is still fun and everyone that sees me shooting with it wants one so hopefully it's successful enough we see a follow up with improvements sooner than later. My personal biggest request would be autofocus because for the times when you get just the right distance and the right metering, the i-type film is capable of great results. The film really needs a camera that can show it off consistently.
Polaroid (the first Polaroid company) did have a black and white integral film. It was 600 iso film only tho if I remember correctly. The spice girls even made a commercial to promote it .
Putting the photos in your pocket is actually a good tip too. They recommend putting the photos face down to develop. Thanks for the video it was helpful.
I️ had the same under exposure issues. Moving the switch seemed to help my situation. however most of the photos I’ve taken so far are closer candid shots of friends n family, so the flash did help fill out the shadows in my case
Regarding the flash, the official line from the OneStep 2 manual is: "Always use the flash when shooting indoors, even if you don't think you need it. Indoor light appears yellow on analog film - the OneStep 2's flash is designed to compensate for this." You can see it as a quick fix for yellow tones but if you think about it it makes sense to have the "white balance" of the film warm for shooting outdoors and then compensate indoors with the flash. If the film looked cold by default there'd be no way to bring the temperature back up. From what I've seen Instax film is nice and punchy but a bit cold.
I have continued to struggle with the same exposure issues that you saw here (even with adjusting the exposure compensation). Additionally, I have trouble with anything that isn't super well lit that is over 15 feet away -- flash just doesn't seem to have much reach past 10 ft. A good first effort, but I look forward to seeing the next iteration of this. In the meantime, I will still be grateful that there is a new camera on the market and learn to work within the limitations.
I read somewhere you are supposed to have your eye a couple inches from the viewfinder, not right up to it. But I haven’t tried the camera out for myself yet though.
I have been getting amazing results with the b&w and color 600 in my 660 SE, I bet the meter on this is more sensitive to the sky especially if you are accidentally aiming it higher than intended. I have only shot a couple packs so far but I have to crank up the exposure compensation when shooting a composition that's 2/3's sky otherwise it wants to meter for the sky and not the subject. They should have put in framelines since it doesn't have a eyepiece btw!
I bought a couple cassettes of Polaroid600 and I have been having some mixed results. I love shooting with my old school Camera but it's just inconsistent when compared to my Fuji film wide. Some of my photos are overexposed, some are under exposed. Either way I can still see myself buying this film again. Great video as always Joey
I didn't enjoy any of the pictures you took until the first black and white one. I don't know if that's just because I prefer that medium or the quality of the camera wasn't very good. I used to have the Fuji Instax Mini and I preferred the vivid colors although I did not like how small the picture size is.
Great review Joey! I like the fact that the battery is in the camera and not on the cartridge, but I still feel that the price for the film is a bit too high, considering the quality. Have you tried (or will you try) the Instaflex TL70? It's expensive but it seems a lot of fun, I'm seriously giving it a thought for Christmas! :D
I love your videos! It's a shame they screwed up the viewfinder, it seems so tricky to use. To me, your photos don't seem underexposed. I think it's the new film, it has high contrast, and shadows turn out quite dark. As for the flash, all Polaroid instructions tell you to keep it on at all times. Even though we know that's not always the best option
I agree with the viewfinder. That is a big turn off for me with this camera. I am actually in the middle of looking to purchase a vintage Polaroid camera.
I recently bought this camera and have no idea how to use it. Can anyone explain why my pictures are coming out cream colored and also where to store my film and how to develop the clearest photos as the ones that came out are blurry
hey! I'm in the Ventura area and I was wondering where you get your film developed? Im just getting into film photography so I know very little about this whole process
I have a really curvy Polaroid 600 Camera, that I’d rather have a One Step close up that I liked better. The new Polaroid camera could use a pc sync for more powerful flash I suppose.
The colours don’t seem to pop like Instax Wide. It seems like they still have some work to do. It took them 30 years to perfect the original polaroid, Impossible started from scratch only 9 years ago. Whereas Fuji Instax actually bought the rights for the chemistry of the original Polaroid years before they closed down, so technically an Instax photo is the same as an old Polaroid, using the same chemistry that had been around for 50 years and improving on it. Instax Wide is the best it gets as far as instant film goes and it is cheaper. Impossible are riding on the back of the Polaroid name and the big square format but the pictures themselves are not true Polaroids. Instax is more true to the original chemistry.
I find it a bit awkward to hold if you have small hands, and I got the same underexposure in my photos. lol either way I really like it, then again, I don't have a bigass collection of film cameras to choose from, so theres probably better out there than the onestep/2, but it's what i have+enjoy. I had the instax mini for a year, and I really loved it and found it addicting. enough that I felt like I needed to upgrade my instant film experience to a camera w/ bigger pics to fuel my film addiction. so I sold my instax mini and told my mom the only hing I wanted for christmas was a polaroid camera. :P no regrets rofl. but I wanted bigger pics and the onestep/2 was cheaper than the instax wide when you factor in film and camera costs. also i feel like the instax gives you more 'modern' looking images. I'm not a professional, I just like taking photos as a hobby but instax film look like they're taken today. my mother (who grew up in the 60's/70's) told me that the ones that came out of my onestep2 look like I took them in the 70's. so the onestep2 has a more lo-fi feeling to what comes out of it. tbh, I could seriously put my onestep2 pics next to some old pics from family photo albums and see a similar feeling in color. if I had a bigger budget or the space for more cameras, I'd love to get a vintage one, but for now, I'm pretty happy w/ what I got. And, another point, amazon is absolutely fucking bullshit for buying instant film packs. My order? Four color itypes, two black and whites itypes. What did I receive? Two color 600s, two color i-types, one black and white sx-70, and one black and white itype. I can't even fucking use the sx-70. Oh, and if you don't return it within two weeks (something I couldn't do bc I literally went on vacation that week), they'll tell you no returns on film. Fuck 'em. If they think I"m renewing my prime after that, they can fuck off forever. Don't buy from amazon because they'll just close their eyes and pick whatever they got.
Wow you got some BEEF with amazon, I actually scam them in a legal way (if that’s possible) I create prime accounts with different credit cards, get the 40$ gift cards, buy film on prime and then cancel the subscription, so I can get three i type packs for 8$ and fast free shipping HAHAHAAAA Best thing is my mom works on a bank and she helps with the credit card part😂
You know guy you can use those empty film cartridges as pictures frames . I was a self employed Wedding Photographer back in the 80's and gave them to kids when I took their pictures. no need to thrown them away
@@AwesomeCameras Yeah or put them on a small shelf . Christmas a year ago my wife got me a Fuji 300 wide and I love it got a couple of macro shots of snow on a limb ,reminds me of my Polaroid EE 100 I used .The 300 has the same feel==again nice video
I love your prezentation style!!!you are right!i bought it and i am disapointed! First i was so happy for the cheap film and for the new camera but now i prefer vintage polaroid600 with new film.If you can,show as in another video how you scan your polaroid film so perfectly and what scan and programm you suggest for digitized negatives film . :-)
I don't like the fact that Polaroid after abandoning the instant film market for many, many years are going after FujiFilm for their new Square instax in a lawsuit. The FujiFilm might be a tad bit smaller but is way better looking in the contrast of the film.
The thing is, Polaroid hasn't been the Polaroid it used to be. Some guy who later went to jail bought them, and stopped the instant film production. He is not even working with Polaroid anymore. The thing is, Impossible has been using the format under license all these years, and even now, technically, Polaroid Originals is different from Polaroid. They both belong to the same family, but the film is still "manufactured, distributed, and sold by Impossible." Check out the film packaging! Here is the deal: the instant film square format with those proportions is Polaroid intellectual property, and it's natural they want royalties. It's actually Fujifilm who took things to court, and I find it funny how a big company like Fuji wants another company to simply give away their patents. Yes, Polaroid itself hasn't been making instant film, but its owners BOUGHT the intellectual property and the patents, and Impossible has been paying them, too. So why should a huge company like Fuji not pay?
And really, there is no need to defend Fuji. They are a huge company, they did nothing to save the Polaroid format back in the day. They just hoped it would die, most likely. They discontinued peel-apart/packfilm even though there are clearly many photographers who want it. They refused to sell the equipment as well. Their Instax Mini or Square film is actually not cheaper than the PO i-Type film if you think of how much image you get. Yes, it's more reliable, and the Wide film is much cheaper. But considering how big they are, they shouldn't have discontinued packfilm and they should be able to offer lower prices of Instax. Polaroid Originals is making ONE camera at the moment. Fuji has about a dozen Instax cameras/printers. Most people call them Polaroids, anyway, and now Fuji has come out with a square format just when Impossible was rebranding itself? Please!!!
UniHumour way to hype up a company that is doing nothing more than a cash grab on the back of the Polaroid name. It is nothing more than the same crap film that Impossible has been peddling. Selling Used Polaroid camera at 10x the price of their worth. I don’t care what you have to say about FujiFilm, their cameras are affordably priced and they have advanced the technology far beyond Impossible. 1:1 film format is not a new thing. Even for Polaroid film. FujiFilm is far from a huge company. People will expect to be getting the same film Polaroid made a long time ago but the truth is Impossible will never get back the IQ it used to have for the simple fact that government regulation on the chemicals they used. Instax is not the same chemical technology and how it is applied even though it appears to be. Simple fact is instax film is better and cheaper. Impossible is banging on the chance to cash grab on the name alone of Polaroid. If they was smart they would stick to advancing there zinc cameras and cube cameras.
In this instance, the intellectual property being infringed by Fujifilm is a trademark, the iconic Polaroid logo (a square picture area off-center in a larger rectangle, leaving one white border larger than the other), not a patent.
FujiFilm made $1.2 billion in profits (not revenue) last year, so I'd say they are reasonably big. While the impossible project to my knowledge never even made more than $10 Million in profit (not revenue). Fuji sees Polaroid reassembling, after one scam artist sank the entire ship, and want to keep their share of the instant photography market. When they were asked to pay for the IP they were using they ran to court with an argument that basically amounts to "We are making a shit-ton of money right now, we don't want that to change. So we fear that PO is going to be successful or even worse that we'll have to share for using their IP."
I thought the photos all looked great... Even the ones you thought were underexposed. They have that special instant film look that I love.
Loving this new daily segment! It's gonna be a great resource for people who are just getting into shooting film!
You're soooo right about the viewfinder! My photos always looked odd - not like I framed them - and it all makes sense now! I'm still getting used to this camera; I haven't really mastered the exposure yet. Sometimes they come out way underexposed, and then sometimes they're just white. I think I need to practise some more!
I did have the good fortune of owning and shooting a Polaroid SLR 680 years and years ago. After the SX70 film went the way of the dodo, I sold it for a good bit of change. What a piece of machinery. We shall never see anything like it again.
I guess it would like comparing a Linn Sondek to a Crosley Cruiser. They can both play records, but you'll NEVER mistake one for the other.
Great Video, Joey, as always.
+Paul Kane thanks Paul! Sounds like it's time to pick up another SLR 680!!
Nice one Joey, loved your video but would have really appreciated it if you would have corrected the exposure settings and viewfinder compensation during your shoot so we could have seen your adjusted exposures.
Dude that's my hometown! It took me a while to recognize it in the beginning but I immediately knew from the store fronts when the bus came in.
This camera seems pretty awesome I just don't know about the price honestly.
+SuperStarbomb yaaaa pierpont!
I've shot about 6 boxes so far and gotten pretty mixed results. There is definitely a learning curve to how this camera meters, the distances it's sharpest, and especially the viewing through the finder. It is still fun and everyone that sees me shooting with it wants one so hopefully it's successful enough we see a follow up with improvements sooner than later. My personal biggest request would be autofocus because for the times when you get just the right distance and the right metering, the i-type film is capable of great results. The film really needs a camera that can show it off consistently.
Polaroid (the first Polaroid company) did have a black and white integral film. It was 600 iso film only tho if I remember correctly. The spice girls even made a commercial to promote it .
Putting the photos in your pocket is actually a good tip too. They recommend putting the photos face down to develop. Thanks for the video it was helpful.
I️ had the same under exposure issues. Moving the switch seemed to help my situation. however most of the photos I’ve taken so far are closer candid shots of friends n family, so the flash did help fill out the shadows in my case
+Andrew Jones ya, next think I'm gonna try is some candid close ups like that... Thanks for watching!
Sweet review man been wanting to pick one of these up but there’s not a lot of good reviews on them. Keen to see more
thanks for watching!! many more to come!!
Regarding the flash, the official line from the OneStep 2 manual is: "Always use the flash when shooting indoors, even if you don't think you need it. Indoor light appears yellow on analog film - the OneStep 2's flash is designed to compensate for this."
You can see it as a quick fix for yellow tones but if you think about it it makes sense to have the "white balance" of the film warm for shooting outdoors and then compensate indoors with the flash. If the film looked cold by default there'd be no way to bring the temperature back up. From what I've seen Instax film is nice and punchy but a bit cold.
Thanks for the review. Im sticking with my trusty Impulse SE for now!
+thnikkamax not a bad idea!
When you take outdoor photos do you keep the flash on?
I have continued to struggle with the same exposure issues that you saw here (even with adjusting the exposure compensation). Additionally, I have trouble with anything that isn't super well lit that is over 15 feet away -- flash just doesn't seem to have much reach past 10 ft.
A good first effort, but I look forward to seeing the next iteration of this. In the meantime, I will still be grateful that there is a new camera on the market and learn to work within the limitations.
I read somewhere you are supposed to have your eye a couple inches from the viewfinder, not right up to it. But I haven’t tried the camera out for myself yet though.
I have been getting amazing results with the b&w and color 600 in my 660 SE, I bet the meter on this is more sensitive to the sky especially if you are accidentally aiming it higher than intended. I have only shot a couple packs so far but I have to crank up the exposure compensation when shooting a composition that's 2/3's sky otherwise it wants to meter for the sky and not the subject. They should have put in framelines since it doesn't have a eyepiece btw!
Chasing those birds was epic 😂
+Jan Jeric Santos thanks! Ya, chasing the birds is always kinda fun! Usually makes for a good photo :)
I bought a couple cassettes of Polaroid600 and I have been having some mixed results. I love shooting with my old school Camera but it's just inconsistent when compared to my Fuji film wide. Some of my photos are overexposed, some are under exposed. Either way I can still see myself buying this film again. Great video as always Joey
+Diego Mckenna thanks so much! Ya, hopefully we can just get a more consistent film soon. So we know what to expect...
Great Job on the video. I just picked up a pack of Polaroid 600 color
+Jeff St.Onge Photography happy shooting!
i love the new polaroid one step one 2 and the new "cheaper film"
love your videos!
yaya! been digging the cheaper film myself :) thanks for watching!!!
I know this video is old but just wanted to mention the original polaroid company did have a black and white film.
I didn't enjoy any of the pictures you took until the first black and white one. I don't know if that's just because I prefer that medium or the quality of the camera wasn't very good. I used to have the Fuji Instax Mini and I preferred the vivid colors although I did not like how small the picture size is.
Love the flying birds and truck pic. I’m thinking about purchasing the canon Ae-1 and a land camera but I’m not sure yet. 🤔
+Rebecca Eludinni thanks so much for watching! AE1 is always a solid choice :)
Rebecca Eludinni go for a Canon F1
Monte LK I’ll look into it. Thx.
Go for it bish❤️
Your the 1st person I seen doing the developing the film the RIGHT WAY !! thank you
👌👌👌💪
Great review Joey! I like the fact that the battery is in the camera and not on the cartridge, but I still feel that the price for the film is a bit too high, considering the quality.
Have you tried (or will you try) the Instaflex TL70? It's expensive but it seems a lot of fun, I'm seriously giving it a thought for Christmas! :D
+Playerdue Lighting the battery thing is great, except when you forget to turn the camera off, like I've done twice now ;)
Yeah, I knew this looked like Ventura. Was at Pirate Ship park last weekend. Small world.
I love your videos! It's a shame they screwed up the viewfinder, it seems so tricky to use.
To me, your photos don't seem underexposed. I think it's the new film, it has high contrast, and shadows turn out quite dark.
As for the flash, all Polaroid instructions tell you to keep it on at all times. Even though we know that's not always the best option
+UniHumour ya, I think I'd rather have my highlights a bit blown out than such dark shadows...
Good honest review!
+Erick Iniguez thanks for watching! We try to keep it honest over here :)
Another awesome video! Had no idea that camera even came out.
+youtubeyoutubeyoutube thanks so much! Ya It came out in September I believe
been waiting for this
+Aaron Domanais wait no longer! Thanks for hanging!
I agree with the viewfinder. That is a big turn off for me with this camera. I am actually in the middle of looking to purchase a vintage Polaroid camera.
Awesome video! Just a heads up, the link in the description isn't clickable because of a missing / after .com :p
+zee Z thanks! Fixed! 💪💪
Could Impossible Project duochrome film work on the One Step 2?
yes
I recently bought this camera and have no idea how to use it. Can anyone explain why my pictures are coming out cream colored and also where to store my film and how to develop the clearest photos as the ones that came out are blurry
hey! I'm in the Ventura area and I was wondering where you get your film developed? Im just getting into film photography so I know very little about this whole process
+Serenity Lanae Dexter's Camera! 5 Pacific Ave. Right off main St. They're great, tell them I sent you :)
how can it be compatibile with 600 film if the camera already has a battery?
+Testecoeur it takes I type film, but it is also reverse compatible with 600 type film
I have a really curvy Polaroid 600 Camera, that I’d rather have a One Step close up that I liked better.
The new Polaroid camera could use a pc sync for more powerful flash I suppose.
Very useful well made video thank you so much
+adriansvarela thanks for watching! Trying to stay useful in to 2018;)
The colours don’t seem to pop like Instax Wide. It seems like they still have some work to do. It took them 30 years to perfect the original polaroid, Impossible started from scratch only 9 years ago. Whereas Fuji Instax actually bought the rights for the chemistry of the original Polaroid years before they closed down, so technically an Instax photo is the same as an old Polaroid, using the same chemistry that had been around for 50 years and improving on it. Instax Wide is the best it gets as far as instant film goes and it is cheaper. Impossible are riding on the back of the Polaroid name and the big square format but the pictures themselves are not true Polaroids. Instax is more true to the original chemistry.
I find it a bit awkward to hold if you have small hands, and I got the same underexposure in my photos. lol either way I really like it, then again, I don't have a bigass collection of film cameras to choose from, so theres probably better out there than the onestep/2, but it's what i have+enjoy. I had the instax mini for a year, and I really loved it and found it addicting. enough that I felt like I needed to upgrade my instant film experience to a camera w/ bigger pics to fuel my film addiction. so I sold my instax mini and told my mom the only hing I wanted for christmas was a polaroid camera. :P no regrets rofl.
but I wanted bigger pics and the onestep/2 was cheaper than the instax wide when you factor in film and camera costs. also i feel like the instax gives you more 'modern' looking images. I'm not a professional, I just like taking photos as a hobby but instax film look like they're taken today. my mother (who grew up in the 60's/70's) told me that the ones that came out of my onestep2 look like I took them in the 70's. so the onestep2 has a more lo-fi feeling to what comes out of it. tbh, I could seriously put my onestep2 pics next to some old pics from family photo albums and see a similar feeling in color. if I had a bigger budget or the space for more cameras, I'd love to get a vintage one, but for now, I'm pretty happy w/ what I got.
And, another point, amazon is absolutely fucking bullshit for buying instant film packs. My order? Four color itypes, two black and whites itypes. What did I receive? Two color 600s, two color i-types, one black and white sx-70, and one black and white itype. I can't even fucking use the sx-70.
Oh, and if you don't return it within two weeks (something I couldn't do bc I literally went on vacation that week), they'll tell you no returns on film. Fuck 'em. If they think I"m renewing my prime after that, they can fuck off forever. Don't buy from amazon because they'll just close their eyes and pick whatever they got.
I think it's a bit awkward for anyone to hold, regardless of hand size
Wow you got some BEEF with amazon, I actually scam them in a legal way (if that’s possible) I create prime accounts with different credit cards, get the 40$ gift cards, buy film on prime and then cancel the subscription, so I can get three i type packs for 8$ and fast free shipping HAHAHAAAA
Best thing is my mom works on a bank and she helps with the credit card part😂
I love your videos
+REG INA Thanks! We love you!
Loved the video.
+Stephanie Ferrante thanks so much!
You know guy you can use those empty film cartridges as pictures frames . I was a self employed Wedding Photographer
back in the 80's and gave them to kids when I took their pictures. no need to thrown them away
Yes, I've see that done before, I'll have to start doing that. Might just need to drill a hole in the back so I can hang it :)
@@AwesomeCameras Yeah or put them on a small shelf . Christmas a year ago my wife got me a Fuji 300 wide and I love it got a couple of macro shots of snow on a limb ,reminds me of my Polaroid EE 100 I used .The 300 has the same feel==again nice video
haha remember that old dingy 2:53 from an old episode, one of the first i saw on this channel
+m p yaaa! The thrift store challenge, I didn't realize I ended up on that same dock until I snapped that one...
haha yeah, really like tha channel, only been shooting film for the last 8 months and i love it
whats the name of the song please :)
its just un even light and dark so i just squink before i tale photis just to think how the camera will react
How fast, or how slow do these Onesteps take to print?
Tombstone Dreams They don’t print. They eject and then develop.
I love your prezentation style!!!you are right!i bought it and i am disapointed! First i was so happy for the cheap film and for the new camera but now i prefer vintage polaroid600 with new film.If you can,show as in another video how you scan your polaroid film so perfectly and what scan and programm you suggest for digitized negatives film . :-)
+Κωνσταντίνος Κ I just use a basic flatbed scanner for these. Nothing special at all
yea, i'm stick on sx70
Can this be anymore hipster?
Hey its that ventura
Price of the film os too much
Am I the only one thinking of Ciara's song whenever I hear OneStep 2?
Franco Rizzo Missy Elliott killing it on that one.
Cheap film? The color i-type goes for $16 for 8 shots... Thats not really cheap
cheaper than it used to be. when they were called Impossible Project it was $26-28 per pack of 8 shots
Cheap film? It’s £15 for 8 shots!!
You look like Analog things guy
I'll have to check him out