New Bill Would Make The Supreme Court More Transparent and Accountable

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Senate Democrats introduced a bill that would require U.S. Supreme Court justices to provide written explanations and a vote breakdown for decisions on their emergency docket, also known as shadow docket. Sophie discusses the effort to increase transparency on the nation’s highest court.
    -Sign up for our newsletters: www.democracyd...
    -Shop our merch: store.democrac...
    -Become a Democracy Docket member: www.democracyd...
    -Support our work: www.democracyd...
    Follow us!
    -⁠X/Twitter⁠: / democracydocket
    -⁠Facebook⁠: / democracydocket
    -⁠Instagram⁠: / democracydocket
    -⁠TikTok⁠: / democracydocket
    -Threads: www.threads.ne...
    Resources:
    -Read more about the Shadow Docket Sunlight Act: www.democracyd...
    -Learn more about the Shadow Docket: www.democracyd...

ความคิดเห็น • 202

  • @earthmama5659
    @earthmama5659 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    This Shadow docket has proven to be a shame! Like it’s ok for Corporations to pollute our water!😤😤😤

    • @mommy4b4
      @mommy4b4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      And much other "sneaky" stuff !!
      Vote Blue
      🇺🇲 🏳️‍🌈 💙💙💙💙

  • @cdg-hzg
    @cdg-hzg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    If the court continues to keep their shadow docket rulings and rationale secret, then those rulings should be ignored. No transparency - no compliance.

    • @kerwyn8322
      @kerwyn8322 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remember SCOTUS only has power if their rulings are followed, they have no teeth as they say. So states need to start ignoring these unconstitutional rulings.

    • @realitycheck5902
      @realitycheck5902 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What rationale, they have no Constitutionally legal rationale for their radical political decisions. It's based on undermining the rule of law/imposing the sheer political will of men on society.

  • @ceceliadenny3542
    @ceceliadenny3542 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Can you imagine if the Supreme Court was held accountable for what they do in session. Imagine making them responsible for themselves. They are supposed to set the bar, not crawl under it!💙🇺🇸💙

    • @rowynnecrowley1689
      @rowynnecrowley1689 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope. I cannot imagine SCOTUS doing anything they're told. They'll just strike down the bill.

    • @nonenone324
      @nonenone324 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Love your content 😊

    • @Alex-zs7rv
      @Alex-zs7rv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Set the bar? You're obviously clueless as to the purpose of the Supreme Court. Sit this one out and STFU.

  • @AdamBladeTaylor
    @AdamBladeTaylor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Nobody aside from the President should be under more scrutiny and accountability for their actions than the SCOTUS.

  • @Izzyirizarry
    @Izzyirizarry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    About time. Our system of checks and balance currently does not check nor balance the SCOTUS. Power to the people, not unchecked power to 9 unelected lifetime appointees.

    • @combatepistemologist8382
      @combatepistemologist8382 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      There is a school of thought has it that although Federal Court justices have lifetime tenure, Congress maintains the power that allows them to transfer judges from one federal court to another, including Supreme Court judges. Congress might, with enough votes, pass a law whereby Supreme Court justices are rotated in through the 13 circuits for fixed terms.

    • @mommy4b4
      @mommy4b4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@combatepistemologist8382
      Love this 👏
      Vote Blue 🇺🇲 🏳️‍🌈 💙💙💙💙

  • @mommy4b4
    @mommy4b4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    We're watching you #SupremeCourt
    #VoteBlueAmerica
    🇺🇲 🏳️‍🌈 💙💙💙💙 💪
    👏👋✌️
    #FieldTeam6 ✔️
    #BlueVoterGuide ✔️
    #ProPublica 📚
    #Project2025 😡

    • @Detrumpificator4377
      @Detrumpificator4377 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      We must keep or expand the Senate and win back the house. Then we can impeach those who need to be.

    • @hamburgersmmmmmm
      @hamburgersmmmmmm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, they don't care.
      They aren't elected representatives and have lifetime appointments.
      The only way we get change is through impeachment.

  • @Seeker46x
    @Seeker46x 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    💙💙💙💙 All eyes are on the Supreme Court 💙💙💙💙

  • @CharlieFreeman-xw6fl
    @CharlieFreeman-xw6fl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Great news! #SupremeCourt you've been warned!

  • @ethankirchneranimation
    @ethankirchneranimation 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    Awesome! 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 The SCOTUS needs to be held accountable and responsible for making bad decisions.

    • @Izzyirizarry
      @Izzyirizarry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Not for making wrong decisions, but for getting paid by billionaires to do so. That's the point.

    • @realitycheck5902
      @realitycheck5902 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good luck with that. We have a choice to impeach/remove corrupt jurists from the bench/or increase the number of apolitical, honest jurists.

    • @irmafacundo7107
      @irmafacundo7107 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      NOT ENOUGH! Financial reporting, party affliction n recluse period. And most every federal n SC must have term limits period....this law is good but less then a 1/4 needed rules n compliance by the present greedy, political preference n lack of moral valves....

  • @susanbradleyskov9179
    @susanbradleyskov9179 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Durban still needs to investigate Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas, publicly. This is not enough.

    • @mommy4b4
      @mommy4b4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes !! 👏 🇺🇲🏳️‍🌈 💙💙💙💙

  • @jacobdenton6065
    @jacobdenton6065 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    If they failed to do, so we impeach

    • @mommy4b4
      @mommy4b4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👏 🇺🇲🏳️‍🌈 💙💙💙💙

    • @CraftyGrandmaDem
      @CraftyGrandmaDem 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We would need a lot more democrat senators to impeach (60 or more). The republicans will never impeach these corrupt s.court justices. They are helping the Republicans. It's like having 6 extra politicians in robes for the republicans.
      Vote Biden/Blue all the way down the ballot. Vote blue until every maga/election denier is out of politics. Save our democracy.

  • @frederickfarmer3304
    @frederickfarmer3304 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    "Transparent and accountable"? That's how it should have been ---- yes should have been like any job. It's chaotic wherever transparencies and accountabilities are lacking; and that's common sense!

  • @spir5102
    @spir5102 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    We must get a majority of Democrats in the house and Senate so they can make sure the highest, most important court in the land has to explain their rulings!

    • @Detrumpificator4377
      @Detrumpificator4377 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Your words are music to my ears. I was beginning to think I was the only one saying that because I rarely see it.

    • @Over.It.999
      @Over.It.999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes! We need some good political ads to educate people about the SC's corruption - because too many people don't pay attention to the news.

    • @marcberman6920
      @marcberman6920 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just give me 60 Democratic senators to get rid of the filibuster, and push the nominations a 4 to 5 new justices, pack the court

    • @corigram
      @corigram 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@marcberman6920 Agreed we need a filibuster breaking Democratic Senate majority, for many reasons benefitting the people, including EXPANDING the number of justices to compensate for the increased caseload due to population growth as this would both allow for better efficiency in case processing on both the emergency and standard dockets as well as balancing the political power of the members. This is only a start however when the level of corruption is lifetime ingrained as now with the increasing depravity infecting the Republican party in particular. The Democratic party is far from perfect but has been better at policing their own.

  • @chael7997
    @chael7997 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Should be COMPLETE transparency and term limits, with MUCH more oversight.

  • @adamzielinski2001
    @adamzielinski2001 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Finally a bill that actually makes sense.

    • @combatepistemologist8382
      @combatepistemologist8382 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ... which regretfully guarantees it will never see the light of day.

  • @combatepistemologist8382
    @combatepistemologist8382 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The current Supreme Court believes checks and balances do not apply to them.

  • @deborahpitcher7723
    @deborahpitcher7723 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    We all need more transparency for sure because the Supreme Court it’s off his rails and it’s very political

  • @kristamccracken4119
    @kristamccracken4119 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's about time!

  • @liberatedwoman
    @liberatedwoman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Transparency won’t do a damn thing without fair and SWIFT repercussions for violations by the justices!

  • @Vaushgg
    @Vaushgg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great.👍👍 I support this.

  • @lbrowning2543
    @lbrowning2543 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We need prohibitions from taking bribes, not transparency in taking bribes. Transparency is irrelevant to someone ensconced in their job as judge for life who has no shame or morals, like Alito and Thomas.

  • @ruthdaley2458
    @ruthdaley2458 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Supreme Court needs to be accountable they should want to be transparent because many Americans believe they are “crooked”.💙💛

  • @kerwyn8322
    @kerwyn8322 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Pass a law nullifying criminal president's appointees and impeach Thomas and Alito = Problem Solved (then pass laws establishing a code of ethics)

    • @mommy4b4
      @mommy4b4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good comment !! 👏
      and We will get there - Convictions coming ....
      🇺🇲 🏳️‍🌈 💙💙💙💙

  • @elmersglue6259
    @elmersglue6259 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They need to remove life time appointments and replace it with term limits. They are need to add checks and balances against the justices and make it easier to remove them when they have been taking bribes for verdicts.

  • @angies.7689
    @angies.7689 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This isn’t much but at least it is a start on the road to reform. Much more has to be done. Dick Durbin must step up to be more proactive in his role or step aside. Sheldon Whitehouse would be far better suited for that role.

  • @corujariousa
    @corujariousa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Every SCOTUS Justice receives an yearly budget that they can use at their discretion without having to file expense reports (and receipts). They can basically pocket the public funds with no questions asked. It would be very fair to have the SCOTUS follow the same processes and laws regular citizens do, especially international anti-bribery laws (they currently get away with that as well).

  • @taramallison
    @taramallison 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Congress has the authority to criminalize behavior. Pass legislation to make "gifts" to sitting federal judges (or their family members) a crime, with a stiff 10-15 year sentence (with a mandatory minimum). Same for judges...make it a crime for a sitting federal judge to accept a "gift"...either to themselves or to a family member. Judges can't rule on cases from a jail cell. These steps don't require a constitutional amendment...get it done!!!

  • @ThomasHalways
    @ThomasHalways 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Alito's wording in the recent gerrymandering case could just as well come from Ku-Klux-Clan. A total disgrace.

  • @troyallen8223
    @troyallen8223 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Obviously using sneaky tactics at their own discretion.

    • @Dragonmist1
      @Dragonmist1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      *at their own profit...

    • @troyallen8223
      @troyallen8223 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Dragonmist1 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼 much better wording. Cheers on that...🥂🤌🏼

  • @doublevision70
    @doublevision70 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bring down the veil of secrecy of SCOTUS for the sake of transparency and accountability.

  • @electropanel1211
    @electropanel1211 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stronger bills needs to come out for supreme court justices that are making decisions violating civil rights, checks and balances are needed

  • @jimk8520
    @jimk8520 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “Restore public trust in the court” that bus already left.

  • @martinbroduer1976
    @martinbroduer1976 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Every single decision made by the Supreme Court has to be video and audio recorded so the people can see the process and explanation of the decision being made to be made law that will resolve any issue that needs to be resolved ! The court mustn’t be allowed to make federal laws that are used to govern our country by secret discussions and arguments that we are not allowed access to understand the legal standing that was used to justify the decision! In what universe would the Supreme Court need total secrecy to decide on a case? And not provide any records of how they came to the final decision, and who is the proper person to make decisions without the correct and appropriate evidence and legal precedent that would justify the law!

  • @barbbrinkerhoff1097
    @barbbrinkerhoff1097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow!!!!

  • @DashRiprock513
    @DashRiprock513 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    .... As it should be.. this is America, government business is everyone's business.

  • @scottdavis3571
    @scottdavis3571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    YES! SCOTUS is going off the rails!

  • @Bigbones927
    @Bigbones927 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A baby step. Not near enough and what are the teeth if they dont comply?

  • @ChandraMalone-cy1tg
    @ChandraMalone-cy1tg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I appreciate you 🙂

  • @clairerobinson7658
    @clairerobinson7658 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great information

  • @dawnjohnson8739
    @dawnjohnson8739 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice. And we need a bunch of those judges to retire and term limits.

  • @suzannederusha1370
    @suzannederusha1370 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sounds great, I hope it happens.

  • @BejaVue
    @BejaVue 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, thank you!

  • @albertfiscaletti520
    @albertfiscaletti520 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I can only imagine that the Supreme Court will not be held accountable; the bill will probably not pass. And with six Ayatollahs on the Supreme Court, trying to get them to comply will be like pulling teeth, even if the bill did pass.

  • @paulbruney5091
    @paulbruney5091 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great information kiddo! Let's see if it flies.

  • @StephenSellers-dr3qt
    @StephenSellers-dr3qt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hurray

  • @KathyPantisano
    @KathyPantisano 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And how about ethics rules that are the same as all other judges !!!

  • @bowman4275
    @bowman4275 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's not enough to combat the corruption of Roberts, Thomas and Alito. They should be nulled by extending the court by another 3 justices. It's been done before.

  • @dlcs1406
    @dlcs1406 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very informative

  • @michaelccopelandsr7120
    @michaelccopelandsr7120 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As long as you fear integrity and accountability, you are NOT the good guys!

  • @johnc3276
    @johnc3276 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All of the Justices on the US Supreme Court should be replaced with judges who are voted onto the bench by a popular vote for a term no longer than 20 years and no older than 75. The justices must follow rules of conduct that are not written by them but by the people.

  • @StevieWilliams-uo8mq
    @StevieWilliams-uo8mq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Make the cult followers be accountable for lying to America ✝️💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @Merzui-kg8ds
    @Merzui-kg8ds 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We wouldn't need to introduce ethics and accountability legislation if the GOP would purge their own rot.

  • @stevenelson2641
    @stevenelson2641 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank Goodness! Our laws are barely holding up these days, while our traditions and norms are falling regularly now.

  • @rowynnecrowley1689
    @rowynnecrowley1689 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know how they expect to enforce any bill they pass. SCOTUS is just gonna say, "No, we've determined we don't have to do that."

  • @AmusedMackerel-um3vf
    @AmusedMackerel-um3vf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for keeping us informed. We really need to get the corruption out of the Supreme Court. I disagree with Judge Roberts that the Supreme Court can police court can do itself. We have all seen how that work, and it doesn't at all

  • @PatrickHarris-y6j
    @PatrickHarris-y6j 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds reasonable, on the surface. Devil is in the details, OFC.

  • @Bushman9
    @Bushman9 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Way over due… along with the impeachments of Thomas and Alito.

  • @bbass5711
    @bbass5711 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They should be the most transparent of all. 🤔

  • @frankgodshalk5528
    @frankgodshalk5528 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great news! They should be accountable!

  • @virginiashroyer2279
    @virginiashroyer2279 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great program! Too bad Fox News doesn’t have many honest as you are!

  • @dlcs1406
    @dlcs1406 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yeah, good luck getting that passed. Would be easier to pass the Border bill

  • @mybachhertzbaud3074
    @mybachhertzbaud3074 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hopefully the writers of this bill has completely sifted through our ambiguous constitution to make sure the court will not just call it unconstitutional. Although this courts propensity to ignore precedent may still make it moot.🤔

  • @hifinsword
    @hifinsword 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Vote "D" for DEMOCRACY!
    Vote "R" for RUSSIA!
    GOP - Gov't Of Putin!
    VOTE BLUE!!! 💙💙💙

  • @wiley238
    @wiley238 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We need laws that holds the Supreme Court Accountable. They can't be Trusted.

  • @patrickmaline4258
    @patrickmaline4258 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    never have so few been so dependent on the police to keep from being torn apart by the people whom they have promised to serve. ☮️

  • @newoldvideos989
    @newoldvideos989 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The SC needs to be expanded, it is not a balanced court now..

  • @JuliLatkas
    @JuliLatkas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Because Justice Matters ⚖️♎💙🇺🇲💙🇺🇲💙🇺🇲💙🇺🇲💙🇺🇲💙🇺🇲💙

  • @BDot-dv7lq
    @BDot-dv7lq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the headline is true, it will never pass, ever.

  • @dusty4047
    @dusty4047 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Biden needs to expand the court

    • @elmersglue6259
      @elmersglue6259 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Someone needs to remind Biden that there are 13 districts, but there are only 9 judges. My math says that 4 more judges need to be filled.

    • @pamelas9
      @pamelas9 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@elmersglue6259That’s an interesting take. Would each SCOTUS then need to maintain residence in a ‘home’ district? Would they have responsibility to those district courts?

    • @elmersglue6259
      @elmersglue6259 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pamelas9 www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx

  • @AlfCalson
    @AlfCalson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Remember MOSCOW ITS
    But it's MOSKOWITZ

  • @JohnArnold-fc2xo
    @JohnArnold-fc2xo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Low bar SCOTUS….no respect

  • @nellcavaletto8098
    @nellcavaletto8098 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are NO. CHECKS and BALANCES on the. SUPREME COURT. THEY take care of THEMSELVES

  • @CatCaretakerID
    @CatCaretakerID 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What has happened to all of our checks and balances? Too many people & entities are not doing their part. Anyone in Congress with the temerity to request the appropriate checks and balances in our recent past, has been stonewalled and criticized by the Republican party and other smarmy folks in Congress, or the previous President and his MAGA butt kissers. Dang - if you are Congress, the Executive branch or the Federal Courts please do your job properly. We are depending on it.
    This must also include checking unethical behavior by corporations - Enforce the anti-trust laws. I just saw recently that T-Mobile is acquiring US Cellular - what the heck?

  • @delberthageman1152
    @delberthageman1152 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    About time but not one republican will vote for it

  • @stephenmichalski2643
    @stephenmichalski2643 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THIS SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO BE DUMPED

  • @dianagale581
    @dianagale581 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Because now we have a court of grifters and traitors

  • @Mistersnv
    @Mistersnv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hold them accountable also America.

  • @gsnyder2007
    @gsnyder2007 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel like the whole court operates in the shadows 🙁

  • @DebbyQuigley
    @DebbyQuigley 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    💙🗳️🇺🇸🗳️💙

  • @deborahpitcher7723
    @deborahpitcher7723 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Supreme Court is political no longer. Can it be calling laws or making decisions when they are politically driven?

  • @clarencethompson2707
    @clarencethompson2707 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The bill would have to get a 2/3 Mojorty to pass and become law no a chance in this congress.

  • @ronaldgum6409
    @ronaldgum6409 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:00 Congress does not have the authority to ban Shadow documents. The supreme Court would just tell Congress to go pound salt. Is there such a thing as separation of states. It would never pass Congress anyhow.

  • @b991228
    @b991228 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When the SCOTUS wants to give an undetectable gift to dark money the name of the game is shadow docket. It makes that arctic salmon over the camp fire taste so delicious.

  • @jason8569
    @jason8569 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can we do anything about USPS to have the right to send are ballets safely and speedily though the mail. De joy wants to screw USPS up so much that we turn to UPS or FedEx or another for US mail delivery.

  • @ChandraMalone-cy1tg
    @ChandraMalone-cy1tg 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes thank you very much😂

  • @thisismetoday
    @thisismetoday 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does Sheldon sponsor this as well?

  • @JohnArnold-fc2xo
    @JohnArnold-fc2xo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cameras in the courtroom

  • @roguedogx
    @roguedogx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This seems better than nothing, but it also seems like throwing a glass of water on an oil rig fire.
    That is to say a highly inadequate solution to a serious problem.

  • @Stumble1b4
    @Stumble1b4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beer, beer, beer, beer, judges love beer.

  • @AtomicBuffalo
    @AtomicBuffalo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s disappointing but not surprising that there’s no mention of a GOP co-sponsor.

  • @Stumble1b4
    @Stumble1b4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait the male Supreme Court members like beer. If the shadow docket is beer time. Judges love beer.

  • @MikeVinyard-bs3lj
    @MikeVinyard-bs3lj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hope they move to Jan 6 trial
    34house members 17senetors jenny thomas remove all insecurectionist from government

  • @jeanhendersonharley3228
    @jeanhendersonharley3228 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about stopping them from protecting trump

  • @clarencethompson2707
    @clarencethompson2707 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This new bill can not get a 2/3 Mojorty to pass and become law there no way with this congress that this can happen the bill is DOA.

  • @virgedavila1290
    @virgedavila1290 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    #NotMyCourt

  • @yoram_snir
    @yoram_snir 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please synchronize video and audio 💙

  • @dougstirling6414
    @dougstirling6414 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does it include term limits ?

  • @SuperCosmicChaos
    @SuperCosmicChaos 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ya that bill will never happen. Why you ask? because the Supreme Court would just rule it unconstitutional.

  • @jason8569
    @jason8569 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its a great bill but i don't think anything will restore my faith and trust in the supreme court or in congress. If Dem win back congress and the white house and they don't deal with the voting right act so no politician can ever screw with it again gov. might never get my trust back.

  • @veramae4098
    @veramae4098 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Slow down. Need an interesting background too.