Why Do Inter And AC Milan Share A Stadium? 🏟️
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- Stay Effective! 🤝
DOWNLOAD OUR TRAINING APP ⚽️📲
👉 traineffective...
APPLY TO OUR FOOTBALL CAMP 🏡⚽️
👉 m.traineffecti...
FOLLOW TRAIN EFFECTIVE
TikTok: / traineffectiveofficial
Instagram: / traineffective
Spotify: open.spotify.c...
Apple Podcast: podcasts.apple...
Our camp guests had never seen a Premier League stadium, so we went to see 3! Watch it here:
th-cam.com/video/c1CjtZq9eFk/w-d-xo.html
Its crazy that both legs of their ucl semifinal where played home, since the teams share the same city and stadium. Mind blowing
True 🤯
that must have been extremely convenient for players
Speak English
Convenient but the "home advantage" when it comes to the fans is still there during the two legs
@@rayanmehadjeri7604exactly, for their “away” game they would have had the standard 5% of the capacity
So iconic, sad to see it go soon
The stadium must go it is very old and last time i was there i saw cracks on pillars plus the structure looks very weakened over time. So its a smart move.
@@dennisjohnson4365then what about Eden Gardens and VYBK in Kolkata ?! VYBK holded the record of the biggest stadium in the world for many years . What about that ??! More than 130 yrs old !!
The stadium is not getting demolished, this narrative has been overblown by foreign media
@@SportzLoverHimu that my friend is well maintained
well you can't stop progress can you?
As awesome as "The Cathedral" sounds, San Siro should remain there. It is a symbol of the Milan Derby, the most feared Derby of the derbys.
San siro is in disrepair, probably unsustainable keeping it and maintaining
It's in too bad of a state to stay in use
The only reason it's not already closed is because it's legendary stadium
I agree that it is important and I hope some of the old symbolism or some designs of that stadium remains.
I also hope that AC and Inter will actually own the cathedral.
I actually think the name is a bit meh. San Siro is the traditional name and I think it carries more allure
@simon caton I agree I don't think "The Cathedral" Is a good name for these big boys, I like san Siro just because its sounds more italian and also match with the culture in milan
If you weren't a nostalgia guy and could just face reality, you would know the san siro is in too bad of a shape.
It should be a crime to destroy such iconic places
I agree, but it’s literally starting to fall apart. Certain sections are even closed off.
@@CommanderOfRussia1 well they could renovate the stadium and replace the old materials
@@ReyesBlaugranas Italy is really weird with their stadiums, only 4 teams actually own their stadiums. To get anything done in Italy takes years just to even get permission, I think the Milan council wants a new stadium so nothing the teams can do about it. Doesn’t help that Italian football is broke right now. Shameful to see such history run into the dirt, but something has to happen in the near future.
@@ReyesBlaugranas its probably cheaper to demolish and rebuild than to repair.
@@CommanderOfRussia1Italy just sucks at taking care stadium. They should have use concrete powder that the Romans use.
Two teams sharing a stadium is like when your mom says to play with your brother on the same pc
In the US 4 NFL teams share 2 stadiums
@@allensaunders449are they rival tho
@@peatta giants and Jets
And Chargers and Rams ( giants and Jets is a rivalry tho the Giants usually win) and chargers rams isn’t as much
@@allensaunders449 cope burgersluts
@@allensaunders449 Meanwhile Singapore requires all its professional football league's teams to share stadiums, & each team also plays an additional match each season against each league opponent @ the neutral _Jln Besar_ Stadium (where the country's football association is also headquartered at)
Had the pleasure to play in san siro/guiseppe meazza. For some reason it feels smaller than it looks.
Thats sibling love right there.
I wonder why the need to demolish san siro instead keeping san siro while building the cathedral so they have 2 stadiums and decide which one own each stadiums
It is because both teams would want to be in the brand new stadium. Also it would cost a huge amount of money so it would be easier if both put money into the new one.
Keeping the old one running will cost a lot and it’s old now needs a lot of repairs
Because it takes big space in city of Milan
Because the location of it is perfect and you can't find such a big space in the city size of milan
One reason is that the San Siro is in heavy need of renovations to the point it's probably cheaper to demolish it and rebuild it
It’d be so cool having 2 season tickets there, getting to watch 38 home games every season would be insane
When they face off, the visiting team is actually playing at home
I think one of the teams is the home team and have more fans and the next match they are the away team.
San Siro isn't Blue or Red, it is Purple, imagine if the 2 clubs ever merged, that would become an OP club
Wouldn't be as OP as man city
@@davidz2690 No history, oil club
@@Electricc__ They're older than Inter, and Inter is owned by the chinese...
@@Electricc__ how come our only european trophy was in the 70s then 😭 learn your ball
@@davidz2690 and Inter still has more history, crazy
Private stadiums are relatively a new concept. At the time in the 1950’s to 60’s stadiums were built by the government and allowed private teams to use them. This is why lazio and Roma play in the stadio olimpico as it was built for the Olympics
The cathedral is just the name of the project. The new stadium will probably still be called San Siro
Sad to see it go it’s such a beautiful iconic stadium 😢
Wow thanks and just a question what if they are playing against each other who gets the home side?
Whoever is registered as the home team gets to have majority of the stadium. The away team will sit in away stand which is much less.
it depends, for example when they play against each other in the serie a the 2 games are the first ac milan-inter and the other inter-ac milan, or vice versa.
like any other match, in the end the difference is that the team who (formally) plays at home has the home stands while the other has the away stands with much less fans
They cant destroy a stadium with that much history.😥
R.I.P San Siro❤
The truth is that building a new stadium costs less money rather then fixing it
Short answer: Italian bureaucracy makes it almost impossible for clubs to build and own their own stadium, and must therefore use the municipal government’s stadium and pay rent.
Also, please do not spread information about San Siro being demolished, that is absolutely not true. Those plans have been a matter of debate with the Milan Municipal Government for literally years. San Siro will stay for the foreseeable future. Read above to see why.
Yup, was about to comment exactly that.
@@arijit3110you weren’t
Because it is also uneconomical to build more stadiums in the same city, which did not happen here in Portugal when several stadiums were built for euro 2004 and some in the same city as was the case with Benfica and Sporting a few kilometers from each other, as if we were a rich country, but we are good at wasting money we don't have on things we don't need to look rich.
Here in Argentina, in the capital city of Buenos Aires we have more than a dozen stadiums. In another city, Avellaneda, are two stadiums that hosts my team and the rival, Racing Club and Club Atlético Independiente, both of them with a distance of 200 meters of the other one. They are literal neighbors.
"The Cathedral" looks like any other shoebox that's been built in the past 10 years. I understand that San Siro is too old, but you can't replace it with smth bland like that.
The Cathedral is not happening. Milan is looking to build a stadium of their own property in a different city, since Milano's city council is against the idea of demolishing San Siro and is blocking every project to build a new stadium.
More teams should share stadiums, it's such a waste of space and resources when teams from the same city have 2 stadiums right next door to each other.
It just makes sense. Stadiums cost billions and they can be shared with no downside, I don't get why more don't share them.
the fighting brothers that never skip each other
what if they built the cathedral but they don't demolish the san siro, so that Inter and Ac Milan have their own stadiums (it's okay if you don't agree)
One of the teams who wants San Siro as base should buy the right and renovate it. Although at least they have to have €2 billion.
@@muhammadrifqi25 both have tried but the government will never sell it, it makes them too much money
Same thing happens in maracanã here in Brazil, where flamengo and fluminense are both huge rivals, and play in the same stadium
ITs good seeing 2 teams sharing a stadium
That was indeed the case for the new stadium untile a few months ago, it will not be shared as inter lack the funds for its construction, it's widely known that inter will be in the old rusty san siro alone whilst Milan will have their new stadium in a close location within the next few years
Tbf, it's something which isn't standalone in Italian Football as The Giuseppe Meazza is shared by AC Milan and Inter, but also the Stadio Olimpico which is shared by Roma and Lazio, and before they was defunct Hellas Verona shared their Stadio Marc'Antonio Bentegodi with Chievo Verona as well as Genoa and Sampdoria sharing Stadio Luigi Ferraris
Well we got the same thing in India as well
The Salt Lake Stadium or VYBK
The home ground for both Indian Football Giants Mohunbagan and East Bengal.
It had the capacity of like 100k but is now restricted to ~65k
Sad that the Iconic San Siro will be no more. But only a venue named "The Cathedral" is worthy to takes it's place (awesome name)
The iconic San siro. Which saw players like Van Basten,Gullit,Ronaldo Nazario,Kaka, Ronaldinho,Eto'o,Zanetti and Maldini and many more legends
People asking what it’s being destroyed. It’s apparently not up to date with the new stadium standards. Not a fan of either but it is sad to see the San Siro being demolished as a football fan
such a shame to lose the San Siro, truly the home of passion
It’s pretty common, here in Mexico América and Cruz Azul, two of the biggest clubs share the famous azteca stadium. If there’s two big teams in a city they just share a stadium.
The real reason:
Very few Italian clubs actually own their own stadiums. In fact, across the top 3 divisions of Serie A, B and C, only 3 clubs directly own their stadiums. Those clubs are Juventus, Sassuolo and Udinese. The rest of the stadiums are mostly owned, maintained and run by the local municipal government of the city that the club is based in. So if there are 2 clubs based in the same city, they often have to share the stadium as it’s cheaper for the city. AC Milan and Inter sharing San Siro isn’t the only example but it’s the most famous one. Other examples include Lazio and Roma sharing Stadio Olympico. Hellas Verona and Chievo sharing Stadio Marc'Antonio Bentegodi. Genoa and Sampdoria sharing Stadio Luigi Ferraris
Imagine Man City sharing Old Trafford or Man United Sharing The Ethiad
Inter was really like: my mom said it's my turn to play in the San siro
So sad it’s getting demolished. but i’m very lucky i got to see it this year before it got knocked down
Cathedral better have that weird lookin Pillar
Thanks a lot for the info!
San Siro the name holds meaning but who the fu*k came up with the cathedral 😢😢
tbf its a good name
@@legendohpro8249 no
This is so smart tbh, why waste money to build 2 stadiums if they can get away with one
Fr
Maybe one day it’ll be like Newcastle and they will be one club, would be cool to see that but also sad. Good luck in the CL Inter!!
It’s criminal to destroy such an iconic stadium
Ac united coming soon
Well I am glad to have visited when I had the chance. It's a beautiful stadium.
Yeah it's sad to see such a stadium destroyed but everyone in Italy already knows that by like a year.
Maldini said it's because of the repairs and for making more seats and i cant blame him but San Siro will always remain in everyone's ❤🖤💙 Goated stadium.
Lets hope the next one mantains the leggendary levels of San Siro🤞
Something about rivals sharing a stadium doesnt sit right with me.
I like the sound of “The Cathedral”.
Lastest rumour, AC Milan want to build own stadium without Inter
So when they play each other it’s a home game for each of them?
😅imagine both teams in d semi final of d CL wen away goals count more, how then do they decide which team has scored more away goals if they draw d tie.
Even though I love the names San Siro/Giuseppe Meazza, The Catedral is one of the best names I've ever heard for a stadium
That photo of Lukaku with is shirt on the corner flag is too iconic.
You'd think that a video about the 'San Siro' would mention that the stadium isn't actually called the San Siro
Scrimmage must be crazy
I hope I get to see Bari in Serie A, if not, welcome back Cagliari.
Much cheaper sharing perhaps if both clubs had separate stadiums they may not have been as successful
I keep seeing the suggestion that one team moves out and the other "keeps" the san siro. The city owns the stadium, meaning they get the most of the matchday revenue and we get crumbs.
It's why both have joined to co own the new stadium, we need that stadium revenue if we want to compete with the rest of Europe, staying in the san siro would be great but the stadium doesn't belong to either of us and it's in need of renovatio. We have to move
Wonderful old stadium 🏟 ❤
I gotta watch a game there with my future kids
They should join forces and changed their name to Milan United
Ac Milan forever
The "cathedral" should go to one of the teams and ac milan should keep san siro
The thing that still made me wonder is how they trained when they have derby match?
Tear down an iconic stadium. In England, there would be riots in the streets, I feel like. Just build the second one and let Inter have it since the San Siro was AC Milan’s to begin with
Inter wouldn't get the revenue from the stadium, that's one of the main reasons for this project.
They should leave the San Siro then build the “Cathedral “ and let inter and ac Milan choose which stadium to play at
That manager in black and white was packing
Packing?
San siro even not belong to both club.
Its belong to city council.
Or as you can say both club is doesn't have their own stadium.
Actually not, inter’s owner and Milan’s owner want to go separate ways and build their own new stadiums, Milan city council is delaying the idea of demolishing san siro and building a new stadium where san siro right now stands hence it might be demolished permanently and both owners will go their separate ways to build new stadium
I find this so tacky and frankly embarrassing that clubs as big as AC and inter share a stadium. Imagine spurs and arsenal sharing one - impossible!
Surely the should hust keep them both and each have a stadium
They shouldn't be able to destroy it. Should be protected like The Colosseum in Rome. It has been a cultural ground for over a century.
Roma, Lazio, Italian national team, Italian Rugby team at Stadio Olimpico
They need to own their own stadiums. It’s just a necessity to be a giant of Europe in today’s age. Each club needs 100% of the revenue.
This is a common thing with other sports in the U.S.
How many clubs in Italy, own their stadiums? Because in Spain and England, the clubs own their stadiums. At least most of them
It'll be sad to see it go but we do need a new stadium.
What would happen if ac and inter are in a title race in the last matchday,and both have home games? Like other leagues,can they even schedule the games at the same time?
Why get rid of “THE San Siro
They should keep San ciroe and build a another one so they don't have to share
Imagine small brothers Monza joining in as well :))
Why will the iconic san siro be destroyed!?
What about times where they have to play same time like the last match day serie A
It’s called
Stadio Giuseppe Meazza not the San Siro!!!
Imagine ac milan vs napoli in ac milan's home and inter milan vs juventus in inter milan's home💀
So how does the dressing room design go? Like in Madrid or United or Chelsea, dressing room of home side is themed red or white or accordingly.
For Milan and inter, how do they arrange that intimacy of home dressing room?
I believe there are 3 dressing rooms. One for each team and a neutral for visiting teams
So in a knockout stage between these two, normally one stadium gets filled withfans from one team in the one leg what happens here??
There's no guarantee rn that they'll share. I think there was some sort of financial disagreement
does this mean that Inter and AC cannot ever play home games on the same day?
Just curious, does that create any problems for the grounds keepers? I was under the impression that the fields need at least 5 days to recover. And considering the two teams are playing league games (home only half the time) as well as other tournaments (UCL, cup, etc) does it at times not have enough time to recover?
The field is pretty much worn and torn. Usually there are brown patches, especially around the goal area.
Watch the games and look at the gk area, should answer your question
What happens if both inter and ac milan have 2 home games in the Serie a at the same time???
It would be funny if they would build two new Stadiums for each of them, but next to each other.
That's the case of my team in Argentina, Racing Club de Avellaneda. Our stadium is literally at 200 meters from our classic rival Independiente. The only thing that separates us is the parking lots.
Inter VS AC Milan Will Both Where There Home Kits
When Inter plays home it s called Giussepe Mezza.
دحناسين من يومكم يا سحالي
Forza Milan ❤
Why don't they just give one team the old stadium and the new one to the other team
If they demolished it and built it in the exact same design , but to completely destroy such a stadium is a crime against humanity
why cant they just give the san siro to one club and the cathedral to the other inatead of destroying the san airo
No more San siro derby 😭, Forza Milan 🔴⚫