The Real Reason NASA Is Developing 100s of Mars Helicopter Drones!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 281

  • @cinemaipswich4636
    @cinemaipswich4636 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    They should start with Aerostats (Mini-Blimps and Balloons). The raise into the atmosphere when the Sun is up, and land on the regolith when the Sun goes down. Just cameras, probe arms and detectors, with telemetry uplinks to satellites. Super cheap - so much so that 20,000 of them could be in place with just one mission to Mars. Gyro-copters are very expensive, complex.

    • @MPlain
      @MPlain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great idea

    • @yuriaddict4245
      @yuriaddict4245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Are you aware of how light the martian atmosphere is lol.

    • @libradragon
      @libradragon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yuriaddict4245 Indeed, looks like we have to use the balast system to the nth degree! (Around Mars in 80 Days Balloon, lol) - Sorry, my humor is suffering from heat stroke...

    • @tonyug113
      @tonyug113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Angry astonaut did a video on that - before i had never realised - Hydrogen balloons would be totally safe -- no oxygen for combustion

    • @dandywaysofliving
      @dandywaysofliving 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonyug113 Mars the place where zepphilin survive

  • @fredwood1490
    @fredwood1490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Why can't those core samples just be stored in the explorer until the retrieval vehicle comes? Wouldn't that make it a lot easier to find the samples? They would be much less likely to be buried in a dust storm or damaged by a meteor near miss. I've never heard the logic behind doing it this way, dropping them in random places to be picked up in several or many years. They are tiny and the rover is the size of a VW!

    • @youandme4ever46
      @youandme4ever46 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      1: perserverence can shot down in any moment.. for this they let the sample down.. and 2: perserverence she make selfie with every sample she take.. and the other rover have a shovel it.s not problem to take them..

    • @danielkrikorian8727
      @danielkrikorian8727 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@youandme4ever46 Good English dude 👌

    • @youandme4ever46
      @youandme4ever46 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielkrikorian8727 i don.t give a fuck about my english dude.. if i understand,write and speak i don.t care if i write corect gramatical or not!

    • @johnpenner5182
      @johnpenner5182 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yes. this is my question too. it seems kind of stupid to throw them all over the place randomly, instead of hold them in a single place!? 🤷

    • @smilo_don
      @smilo_don 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnpenner5182 If the samples are stored in the rover and it dies they're lost unless the entire rover is retrieved.

  • @chadleeds4169
    @chadleeds4169 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great content. As always bringing content forward that I will probably hear about in a week or so.
    Keep up the great work 👍

  • @chriswhite3692
    @chriswhite3692 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank God.
    Now we can finally play Ride of the Valkyries or Fortunate Son on another planet.

  • @brandonmusser3119
    @brandonmusser3119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Elon is a good guy and I think he's got a good ideas what he needs somebody to put them into Overdrive

  • @fredwood1490
    @fredwood1490 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    If the rover can turn over a rock, that might help to find protected amino acids. A recent meteor crater or rock slide would be other places. I wonder if NASA plan to do that?

  • @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV
    @EveryoneWhoUsesThisTV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The coptors are useful for radar mapping the caverns and caves of Mars..
    A lot of free storage space awaiting us there, just needs 3D mapping... :)

    • @coolguydoc1
      @coolguydoc1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol google Maps has to start somewhere

  • @hallahgray3190
    @hallahgray3190 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I think this sounds like China testing technology that will allow them eventually to capture smaller astroids. Which when scaled up would be highly useful if they decide to mine astroids.

    • @hackman669
      @hackman669 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right on. NASA is no looking for life. It is looking for minerals and other things to exploit in space exploration.

    • @anatomicallycorrectmuppets8180
      @anatomicallycorrectmuppets8180 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      China won’t be a country long enough to get there.

    • @MPlain
      @MPlain 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Asteroid mining is a valid and great idea.
      Why we haven't attempted it yet. When there is so much $ to be made from it. unbelievable.
      The state of robotics would allow for the entire thing to be automated.
      The use of renewable and cheap power also valid. Does it matter if it takes longer if it costs nothing to operate ?

    • @cleofusbarbosa5109
      @cleofusbarbosa5109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Or a test for when apophis comes by

  • @liamd7383
    @liamd7383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In the series 'Mas' they use a series of drones to scout and provide aerial data for Martian astronauts.

  • @yfarrell
    @yfarrell ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your videos. You are a great teacher & communicator!

  • @matthewh2503
    @matthewh2503 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your thumbnails look amazing.

  • @atomspalter2090
    @atomspalter2090 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video!

  • @SkashTheKitsune
    @SkashTheKitsune 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    they have developed a new way of drilling using fusion technology to melt and vaporize the rock, miniaturizing one and putting it on mars to drill in deep could be a viable option

    • @SOLIDSNAKE.
      @SOLIDSNAKE. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They've had it for decades that's how they built secret underground tunnels across us

    • @HansDunkelberg1
      @HansDunkelberg1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can you give more details on this, especially names?

  • @jamesdelrogers542
    @jamesdelrogers542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If they could develop a kinetic penetrator Something that takes a core sample as it penetrates With Leaver bars at the end of the shaft t That would effectively use the impact to then recoil eject an in capsulated sample core Maybe with something so it can be tracked And then retrieved by the helicopter There's not much in the atmosphere for it to burn up on Reentry It would be an easy way to collect a lot of samples , Depending on how you design the penetrators You should be able to go down to depths as much as 40 feet Assuming you don't hit any rock

    • @coolguydoc1
      @coolguydoc1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Verrry nice you think there is gold has to be right

  • @markstahl1638
    @markstahl1638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just a thought. Take a copter over one of the rovers to see if they can blow off the dirt from the solar panels. Also, they want to go deeper into the soil on Mars. Perhaps creating an impact of their own, then send in the core sampler after impact. It probably wouldn't need to be very deep...just deep enough.

  • @markhuebner7580
    @markhuebner7580 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great show! Lots of current reality details! Not sure I agree with all described plans, but experiments are the basis for scientific theory refinement! Whoohoo!

  • @Darth_Revan25
    @Darth_Revan25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your outro speech is still cut off bud! Great vid as always.

  • @jesseflynn1259
    @jesseflynn1259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So now we have internal propelsion devices . Why are we not using them?

  • @sidstevens9035
    @sidstevens9035 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What Ingenuity really proved was that our estimation of the atmospheric pressure on Mars was extremely underestimated.

    • @Hansulf
      @Hansulf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why? Was the atmospheric pressure of Mars not well measured?

    • @sidstevens9035
      @sidstevens9035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hansulf obviously not

    • @Hansulf
      @Hansulf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sidstevens9035 So... Then our estimation of the atmospheric pressure of Mars was not underestimated...

    • @sidstevens9035
      @sidstevens9035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hansulf ???
      No it was well underestimated obviously

    • @Hansulf
      @Hansulf 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sidstevens9035 Bro, your comment makes no sense. Do you know what the word underestimated means?

  • @caseyford3368
    @caseyford3368 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That's great and all, but we have to start looking at other ways to detect other forms of life in the universe.

  • @jamesrichardson4741
    @jamesrichardson4741 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Some one please let me know where he gives us the real reason for 100’s of drones as stated in the title.

  • @mrfxm55
    @mrfxm55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Try a propeller powered balloon next. With propane. Or whatever gas would lift it.

  • @2ndhandjoke
    @2ndhandjoke 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What exactly does this drone do? I never seen any pictures from it and it can’t do much of anything else if it can’t lift nothing but itself. What good is it?

  • @paulalietke888
    @paulalietke888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great content.

  • @RavenTD46
    @RavenTD46 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd go up to Mars with a shovel for 83 million, saving you 2 million.

  • @tomedward8652
    @tomedward8652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am probably in the minority hoping that they do not find life on Mars. If they do find something it will most likely be some uninteresting microbes. If they do then there will probably be a focus on preserving them. In my opinion this will get in the way of what we really need to be doing and that is colonising Mars, finding water sources to sustain life.

    • @antonbriggs5680
      @antonbriggs5680 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Plenty of life on earth yet we don't preserve it here what makes you think we will do it on another planet?

    • @tomedward8652
      @tomedward8652 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@antonbriggs5680 - because it will be alien.

    • @anatomicallycorrectmuppets8180
      @anatomicallycorrectmuppets8180 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We do not need to colonize Mars. At all.

    • @antonbriggs5680
      @antonbriggs5680 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anatomicallycorrectmuppets8180 You backup your computer don't you? We need to backup the human race.

    • @tomedward8652
      @tomedward8652 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ Muppets - not many people realise this but with our current technology we CANNOT detect an Earth destroying sized meteor within a 100 year window. Hence there could already be an Earth destroying meteor on its way within 100 years. We also currently do not have the technology to deflect such an object despite what Hollywood might suggest. If it wasn’t for SpaceX we would still be relying on Soyez. NASA have had zero intention of progressing our space fairing technology. If left to government we would still be using Soyez in 2100. I genuinely believe in 70 odd years from now mankind will be saying thank you to the foresight of one individual who decided to push the boundaries of reuseable space Tech.

  • @garygallegos103
    @garygallegos103 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like to know why if a small dull rottor copter , that is needed to left a small amount of weight dos it mean those large raptor engines will work the same on mars has earth in order to land?

  • @ottovonottsville476
    @ottovonottsville476 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @11:31 'Everyday an Astronaut'??

  • @quantumstereotv6319
    @quantumstereotv6319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the martians are like; I saw a ufo...i swear!

  • @chuscradle7392
    @chuscradle7392 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Imagine, you're just looking for life on Mars but found gold instead? Kidding, it's really the other way around.

  • @bozorgone
    @bozorgone 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much power to lift more weight

  • @MarvinTheParanDroid
    @MarvinTheParanDroid 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really liked the impressed Chuck Norris :D --> 1:10

  • @TheMoneypresident
    @TheMoneypresident 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Make a big one to retrieve everything.

  • @Unknown-sw9pu
    @Unknown-sw9pu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Do we have a rough idea of when astronauts will go to Mars?

    • @shimmy1984
      @shimmy1984 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      September

    • @distantthunder12ck55
      @distantthunder12ck55 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Musk recently mentioned 2029 for a Space X manned mission.

    • @Unknown-sw9pu
      @Unknown-sw9pu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@distantthunder12ck55 Thank you!

    • @filonin2
      @filonin2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Phil Failla Why decades? Are you unaware of the spacecraft presented in this very video? What magic would make it take them decades to get to Mars? Smooth brain.

    • @alpha.7637
      @alpha.7637 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never. It's fake

  • @jesseflynn1259
    @jesseflynn1259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes some lived to go on . Now look at our earth . Here we go again

  • @soulife8383
    @soulife8383 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why can't they just put a small propeller above the solar panel to blow dust off as needed?

  • @kasonf2176
    @kasonf2176 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    NASA stands in the way

  • @ionutonea1537
    @ionutonea1537 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    LOVELY ! i LIKE MUCH YOUR NVIDEOS 1 GOD BLESS YOU !

  • @tm-ym2ye
    @tm-ym2ye 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you fly in such thin atmosphere

  • @Jamal2223
    @Jamal2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whenever I hear about destroying asteroids, I can’t help but hear Aerosmith in the background. “I dnt wanna close my eyes…”

  • @nathanadams5676
    @nathanadams5676 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like your videos, it would be Cool if you made videos longer. I like the Content.
    Great for kids to watch.
    Keep Up The Good Works.
    😎👍👍🔭📡🌌🎶

  • @ajctrading
    @ajctrading ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Explosion 💥💥💥
    Elon sez wait till April 2023...

  • @cn8299
    @cn8299 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They need to send a Boston Dynamics Spot robodog to Mars next time.

  • @richardswaby6339
    @richardswaby6339 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Strange. The hought that an asteroid 780m long should have enough gravity to have a moon and to allow a spaceship to rotate around it.
    So when I was climbing a mountain (hill) in Ireland and I felt like the neighbouring mountain was trying to pull me maybe I wasn't imagining it.

  • @thorin1045
    @thorin1045 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    for the outsider, science happens when something spins. a rocket does not spin, so it is boring after the big boom lose its natural sting. literally. had a few media guy in my lab a few weeks ago, show them the insanely expensive equipment, some nice color changing liquid some other experiments and such, only two thing really interested them, the needle used for precise measure of small amount of liquid (needle, spooky) and the spinning magnet that helps to mix liquids, one of the cheapest stuff in any lab. it spins, so it is sciency.

  • @shanenelson3825
    @shanenelson3825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did hear about a mock up to a much larger drone? Not to lift a human but about a 100 pounds. Airships seem better for that purpose.

  • @thetruthrkives
    @thetruthrkives 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There’s an area by the ice caps where the temperature is warm enough to thaw it out and then it freezes back in the night time but I believe there’s a zone we are water is liquid they just don’t wanna let us know just yet because other people from other countries and private businesses we’ll be headed there the next morning

  • @Boet_w
    @Boet_w 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When is the next manned mission going to the moon?

    • @olivergrumitt2601
      @olivergrumitt2601 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Officially it is 2025 but it is likely to be at least several years later than that, if not longer.

  • @jamespayne6068
    @jamespayne6068 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Land in the CYDONIA region of Mars. We know there was life there.

  • @antonnym214
    @antonnym214 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Contrary to near-universal belief: the atmospheric pressure in some of the deeper areas, like bottom of Valles Marineris and Hellas Basin is sufficient to support liquid water ON THE SURFACE between 0 and 10 Celcius (up to 50 degrees F). NASA/JPL and MSSS don't like to talk about it, but we already have pictures of EXTANT liquid water on the surface in ponds, lakes, and possibly a few streams. That's there now, not millions of years ago and then dried up. All good wishes.

    • @Theodorus5
      @Theodorus5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How big and deep are the lakes?

    • @Theodorus5
      @Theodorus5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And they are really salty right

    • @filonin2
      @filonin2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Citation needed. It's pretty ridiculous to suggest that the space agencies would not want to talk about liquid water on Mars, the thing they are looking for. Your claims are sus. Peer reviewed evidence of extant surface LAKES or GTFO.

    • @AnimeHumanCoherence
      @AnimeHumanCoherence 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why do you come here and just boldly lie about obviously wrong shit?
      Edit: you edited your comment after I commented, and it's STILL glaringly incorrect. LMAO

    • @gunslinger2566
      @gunslinger2566 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's "near universally" believed because people believe the math, practical observations and experiments more than some idiot on the internet claiming to be smarter than all of humanity.

  • @dennisflynn4097
    @dennisflynn4097 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why dont they just use an explosive to penetrate deeper into the soil...they could actual open up a large area and discount material identified with the explosion itself...seems like we are moving in slow motion on all of this...the Saturn program would still be on the ground if it moved at this pace

  • @scottingledue7999
    @scottingledue7999 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They should launch balloons with cameras that drift and film while checking weather.

  • @mho...
    @mho... 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, since we didnt find HollowEarth, there must a thriving civilisation in HollowMars. OFC!

  • @proteslapower6754
    @proteslapower6754 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have mentioned to Elon that the infrastructure of Tesla has to be increased by starting a Tesla Texas rental. This will allow more people the opportunity to drive a Tesla for a week or a month allowing them to be the next on the list for a lease or purchase, if so inclined. Also small businesses have to come before the multiple fleet sales by corporations, this allows more distribution of product amongst the population again offering more free word of mouth advertising. So orders under 10 come before orders over 10 or 100 this prevents someone like Herts rental to get all their Tesla's before the starter businesses do. Until production of the Tesla Semi can reach more than 4000 trucks a week I think it is important to keep the fleet sales at 100 trucks or less. If they can Mass produce more than that I would be one of the first to help them with their commercial fleet sales but I also believe in being able to help the smaller businesses get there trucks at the same time and not have to wait in behind for larger orders. So let's shoot for the Moon and Mars, then we will end up amongst the Stars!!

  • @deanhotter6054
    @deanhotter6054 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe one day they'll dig deep and find bones of ancient life

  • @morocoification
    @morocoification ปีที่แล้ว

    What NASA and Space X can do, is build and test inflatable modules and test them on the ISS, for future deployment on new Space Stations.

  • @NicholasNerios
    @NicholasNerios ปีที่แล้ว

    It's definitely a good idea to test and develop colonization techniques for long term space missions, but the real question, Will the drones deliver for Amazon and Domino's Pizza?

  • @xehaytecle932
    @xehaytecle932 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why they did not use the quantum particle physics the study the quantum structure and use the chemical to difuse the atoms in the big stone so it will be changed to ash and collected with a sample and the world will be safety place using the capturing by running the same speed as the large stone it is possible to do that a guess ..so it will be a permanent solution on the earth dwellers thanks

  • @ezramatsu
    @ezramatsu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Armageddon reference

  • @carbonfiberrepiarandfabric8884
    @carbonfiberrepiarandfabric8884 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    We don’t need to dig. Just lend near new cradle

  • @jesseflynn1259
    @jesseflynn1259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Oh yeah we now have hyper missilse

  • @davidhinds9816
    @davidhinds9816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hmm, 33, raptor engines heat and electric motors?

  • @shz6148
    @shz6148 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anybody know about the tic toc ufo?
    If that is real, is it worth using time and money on new drones to try to find life? Should they use money on something else to get more technologi?

    • @sidstevens9035
      @sidstevens9035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Tic Tac UFO's are actually plasma balls produced by synchronising two laser beams. These can be tracked by both radar and infrared cameras. The US Navy has been experimenting with this for years as a possible anti aircraft/missile weapon.

    • @shz6148
      @shz6148 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sidstevens9035 hmm, what about Bob Lazar who since the 80s has said that he worked with this and its not from here?

  • @jamin4556
    @jamin4556 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if they find life on mars and return in here and it gets out?

  • @dorianhall588
    @dorianhall588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    big bro

  • @serenityvos8165
    @serenityvos8165 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's doesnt make sense is why itll take longer to get home rather then when it left to get there... they're stalling and at this rate by the time we get answers we will be in the same early stages all planets go through like states in this video, were going to be very sweaty and crispy running for our lives into space where its alot cooler

  • @Purple.mind...Honored.one.
    @Purple.mind...Honored.one. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amino acids are required for most carbon based life that we know of, but not all life requires amino acids, Please don't use blank statements that are categorically false, We know of far more types of life than just carbon based...
    And even within carbon based there's extremea-files, And if extremea-files don't break the rules enough for you, you gotta start keeping a mind viruses and fire & crystals, anytime you start trying to define life You have to see if it keeps viruses in and fire out, Because there's very few definitions that actually do that...

  • @archiehendricks6093
    @archiehendricks6093 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yep when yer in nars, look behind you, thhars a mars ranger.

  • @WasBlind_NowISee
    @WasBlind_NowISee 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This channel is always the ONLY ones with this type of single piece of news. You will not hear about this on any other news sites or channels. So either their really good and privy to many things because they’re wee ly I’ll tthr game of network

  • @maxwhittaker3315
    @maxwhittaker3315 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Think how much more they could do working together. Instead of a space race.

  • @toddrondone5961
    @toddrondone5961 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    cant they use the helicopters to blow dust off solar panels?

  • @doubleslit9513
    @doubleslit9513 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m all for shooting anything at asteroids. Rockets, bombs, Bruce Willis; whatever!

  • @BrianGarcia-kf4vn
    @BrianGarcia-kf4vn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do they vent it ? I mean isn't that wasteful and expensive over time why not put a vacuum chamber around the circumference of the base an pump the vented gas to a container of some sort i am not an engineer so this is probably a stupid question..

  • @tdawgluxor1060
    @tdawgluxor1060 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    good video. easily watchable at 1.5x speed.

  • @Despotic_Waffle
    @Despotic_Waffle 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine if this whole time we've been paranoid of an alien invasion, but we're gonna end up being the aliens invading and exterminating some primitive martians.

  • @kingcal05
    @kingcal05 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Imagine they find life and its a virus... we all dead

  • @MPlain
    @MPlain 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok....it's Mars
    Dust storms.
    And wicked storms that make anything here on Earth look really mellow.
    And don't forget the temperature.
    So....is going mechanical the brightest idea ?????

    • @sidstevens9035
      @sidstevens9035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can't have dust storms in a virtual vacuum so someone is telling lies about the atmospheric pressure on Mars

  • @tripyramidpictures9224
    @tripyramidpictures9224 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THEIR IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON IT SHOULD COST THAT MUCH!!!!! PERIOD!!!

  • @stevenswitzer5154
    @stevenswitzer5154 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    People arent even there yet and we are littering. Even the robots now too. Damn

  • @Jam-In-With-Ben
    @Jam-In-With-Ben 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi

  • @Thenineoh
    @Thenineoh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm surprised those drones even work in Mars if that atmosphere is really as thin as they say. Or maybe we're getting BSed

  • @protoolsfanatic7276
    @protoolsfanatic7276 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    2.7 billion? that is insane considering your chances of surviving the trip there is almost zero and same for living there.

  • @demej00
    @demej00 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does Congress know about it?

  • @Aaryq
    @Aaryq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait...we found water on Mars?

    • @TheSpaceRaceYT
      @TheSpaceRaceYT  2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In the form of ice and proof that there was liquid water on mars in the past

  • @jjackomin
    @jjackomin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Life on Mars?? Where's David?

  • @lancepaules7594
    @lancepaules7594 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    85 million for that wow. Send a commercial drone along with these next time. You know as a experiment. Cha ching!!! Lol

  • @josephhartwell6214
    @josephhartwell6214 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's against international treaties for governments to claim territory in space

    • @stevenswitzer5154
      @stevenswitzer5154 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. And countries never back out of those things...

    • @josephhartwell6214
      @josephhartwell6214 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stevenswitzer5154 lol they do start wars over it however

  • @nandorsantho7115
    @nandorsantho7115 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why can't it be a joint endeavor,before the war starts🤔

  • @charlesrovira5707
    @charlesrovira5707 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm all for it. That would *amortize* the costs of making *_Ingenuity Class_* drones over the number that are deployed.
    $85,000,000 divided by 1,000 means that each one would cost less than $85,000.
    Being able to count on economies of scale means that, instead of a _bespoke drone,_ new materials and manufacturing techniques could be employed to grind these out like sausages.
    They could become an aerial reconnaissance drone *_service_* which could be used by any number of planetary rovers. (And rented out for $$$.)

  • @johnrudy9404
    @johnrudy9404 ปีที่แล้ว

    The core samples retain signatures which ferment over strata not detected on initial trials. The move to deliver more flying vehicles is the kind of team based vision that got us to the moon. Regular visits and predictable time measures are the arena of business model accuracy.
    Asteroid mining will advance the process and the idea of finding life will fall away, in favor of monetary gain. Same old story. We came for signs of life and stayed for the dollar
    Sign.

  • @1luv4j
    @1luv4j 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never take anything from another planet to yours.

  • @johncharles236
    @johncharles236 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does NASA and the US government tell us everything they find? If they have already found complex life on a celestial body, would they tell us?

  • @V3racious3
    @V3racious3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:22 did you search for "cringiest faux scientists" on your favorite stock footage site?

  • @TheMakerFactory
    @TheMakerFactory 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Y don’t they make them like a quad drone

    • @filonin2
      @filonin2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The atmosphere is too thin on Mars and smaller blades would have to spin too fast. A larger blade can spin slower.

  • @LilBigBud
    @LilBigBud 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does any of this benefit humanity apart from our curiosity?
    In the best case scenario it will cause more questions that require billions more to be spent without solving any of our problems here on our home planet.
    There is a saying and it goes “curiosity killed the cat”

    • @jevvf3246
      @jevvf3246 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're missing the last part of "curiosity killed the cat....."
      ".....satisfaction brought it back"
      ...we cant stay on earth forever. The Sun will flare, volcanos erupt, asteroids hit, etc. Eventually, humanity needs to explore the cosmos and leave earth.
      But while we are on earth, space investment provides us with a couple things.
      1. Research and development which eventually make its way down to the consumer (think about Space x propulsion or energy storage).
      2. Resources (asteroid mining and such)

    • @LilBigBud
      @LilBigBud 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jevvf3246 Resurrection?

  • @CarwynHenigan
    @CarwynHenigan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mars Sample Return. Funding is ramping up from about $250 million to about $650 million for NASA’s contribution to MSR, an international mission to retrieve samples currently being cached by the Mars Perseverance rover, and the administration is seeking $822 million for next year. NASA notes the mission’s total lifecycle cost is expected to increase substantially as it moves to a two-lander architecture for conveying the mission’s rover and an ascent vehicle to the surface of Mars. The agency recently concluded that a single lander capable of carrying both vehicles would depart too far from proven designs. The landers are expected to launch in 2028, two years later than when the single lander was supposed to launch, with the aim of returning samples to Earth in 2033. With this kind of budget increase, it is highly likely many high tech drones would be deployed on arrival to survey all targeted areas previously analysed and mapped, which are most likely to have had life. Exact details on how deeper core samples beyond surface radiation/sterilisation depths will be drilled with a two-lander architecture, appears to be protected information.

  • @brandonmusser3119
    @brandonmusser3119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeah governments fund it but I think individuals should be taking over that now

  • @Jim-xz1ew
    @Jim-xz1ew 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think we should bring any soil from Mars to Earth just yet. We don't know enough. After we have humans on the surface and have completed some solid examinations of martian soil and atmosphere. There is still too many unknown possibilities given the fact this is another planet that may have had life forms for which we have no knowledge of. Who knows what kind of virus could exist on another planet ? No one , we haven't done this yet.

    • @stevenswitzer5154
      @stevenswitzer5154 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Damn it Jim! Im a doctor not a landscaper

  • @AlexiAtlante
    @AlexiAtlante 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are The Klingon in Mars ??

  • @TeddyLeppard
    @TeddyLeppard 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Elon's Teslabots will be the first denizens of Mars. It'll be up to them to establish the underground colonies in advance of a human voyage there.