Hey Rich, I Truly enjoy your straight forward lectures. Thanks for what you are doing. I have two question: 1- I got Anv=1.79 in^2. I guess you have error in the final answer 2- do we need to calculate both lc? we cant go with the minimum? I would appreciate your answer!
On your Anv, It looks like you took the bolt hole area away from 10.5" instead of 10.25". adding .25 inches to Anv. Should it be 1.797 in^2? Great videos though by the way. You are a great help!
Hey man thanks for your effort, great quality content, regards from Colombia, I hope to continue learning new structural knowledge things with you, thanks a lot
Your the best Cesar, thanks for the kind words! We've moved our way out of the janitors closet to the biggest auditorium in the school... and we're just getting started. Let every Columbian engineer know about this team. we could learn a thing or two from you guys.
@@Kestava_Engineering hello, did you ever make a moment connection video, Just curious. I have the same request as Ezequiel. When you do the video, may you show the load path and check the different limit states as you go?
I've just checked this one, pretty good, one thing I'd like to confirm, the effect of eccentricity when it comes to the welding, why didn't we check the welding due to tension along with shear, since the force was out of plane will cause some moment, thanks
very good point Ayman - although the eccentricity is very small, its still a check that should be included and the additional stress effects should be combined in the weld check. great point!
you are absolutely right Aleksei! I decided to leave this check out as the eccentricity is relatively small so the moment on the weld shouldn't be a controlling factor, BUT that's no excuse. It should be checked!
2 ปีที่แล้ว
thanks for the video. One question: I would have selected Ubs to be 0.5 since at the top of the block shear you have a concentrated force to the left (at the bolt position) and 0 to the right (at the free end). Can you explain why you selected Ubs=1.0?
What's your favorite building material? I'd love to know!
Concrete
@@saldingcivil its a pretty amazing material!
I personally think wood is very interesting! I wish they discussed it more in classes
Steel For sure. Love this clean, Predictable Material
What a great walk through of a steel connection and then compare it to AISC table 10-10a. Thanks
Good job.
Hey Rich, I Truly enjoy your straight forward lectures. Thanks for what you are doing.
I have two question:
1- I got Anv=1.79 in^2. I guess you have error in the final answer
2- do we need to calculate both lc? we cant go with the minimum?
I would appreciate your answer!
Thanks for the video! I've been watching your videos to study for PE and the way you explained answered alot of my questions
Great to hear! Let everyone you know to joint this team with you! yaya
On your Anv, It looks like you took the bolt hole area away from 10.5" instead of 10.25". adding .25 inches to Anv. Should it be 1.797 in^2? Great videos though by the way. You are a great help!
Hey man thanks for your effort, great quality content, regards from Colombia, I hope to continue learning new structural knowledge things with you, thanks a lot
Your the best Cesar, thanks for the kind words! We've moved our way out of the janitors closet to the biggest auditorium in the school... and we're just getting started. Let every Columbian engineer know about this team. we could learn a thing or two from you guys.
Very well explained video, it helped me a lot to understand the connections. Could you make a video explaining a fully moment-constrained connection?
absolutely smashing idea!
@@Kestava_Engineering hello, did you ever make a moment connection video, Just curious. I have the same request as Ezequiel. When you do the video, may you show the load path and check the different limit states as you go?
Awesome stuff
thank you!
Any chance you do part 3 and add Moment?
going to be doing a steel moment connection coming soon!
I've just checked this one, pretty good, one thing I'd like to confirm, the effect of eccentricity when it comes to the welding, why didn't we check the welding due to tension along with shear, since the force was out of plane will cause some moment, thanks
very good point Ayman - although the eccentricity is very small, its still a check that should be included and the additional stress effects should be combined in the weld check. great point!
Hey Kestava,
Can you share some resources to solve a situation where a design has some bolts in shear and some in tension simultaneously?
Thanks for the video, one question - isn't the weld situation an eccentrically loaded weld group?
you are absolutely right Aleksei! I decided to leave this check out as the eccentricity is relatively small so the moment on the weld shouldn't be a controlling factor, BUT that's no excuse. It should be checked!
thanks for the video.
One question: I would have selected Ubs to be 0.5 since at the top of the block shear you have a concentrated force to the left (at the bolt position) and 0 to the right (at the free end). Can you explain why you selected Ubs=1.0?
As a junior engineer, I dreaded the AISC manual. You are making my nightmares go away bit by bit.
Thanks a lot Kestävä!
anytime Shishir! BTW great name!
Commentary Illustrations for Ubs in the 15th Ed. are on 16.1-445
MVP for Joel. yayaya
You are amazing
What software and hardware do you use for this video? I mean you can write and record. Thanks.
Microsoft one note and OBS!
I spy a head of the charles quarterzip!
hell yeah Amy! rowed in a 4+ in 2016
@@Kestava_Engineering that's awesome!! I've raced HOCR in a 4+ several times, a single once, and a double once. It's such a great event!