ãāļāļēāļāļĒāđāđāļāļĒãāļŠāļēāļ§āđāļāđāđāļāļ§āļąāļāļāļ°āļāļđāļāļāļĢāļ°āļŦāļēāļĢāļāļĩāļ§āļīāļ āđāļāđāđāļāļāļĄāļĩāļāļēāļāļ°āļāļĩāđāđāļĄāđāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļē āļāļ·āļāļāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļāļāļļāļāļĢāļĩāđāļāđāđ āļāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļāļē!
1:31:16
Is a String ever not a StringKey? Seems like the base String class should just implement the interface for StringKey. The current implementation seems to handle this with a conversion. Does that have a performance impact opposed to making the base String class implement the methods from StringKey?
@aethermass this seems already implemented for String / StringLiteral -> Implemented traits:
AnyType, Boolable, CollectionElement, Copyable, EqualityComparable, Hashable, IntableRaising, KeyElement, Movable, Sized, Stringable
No dict copy?
Dict is very very slow. Way much slower than in python!