Anthony Pardon Trial Day 4 - Jennifer Lester Criminal - Intelligence Analyst
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ย. 2024
- This is a Death Penalty Case.
Anthony Pardon, 54, stands trial in Columbus, Ohio for allegedly killing Rachael Anderson, 24. He faces a slew of charges, including aggravated murder, aggravated burglary, kidnapping, rape, and aggravated robbery.
Prosecutors say the defendant strangled and stabbed the victim to death. Anderson stained injuries to the neck, head, torso, arms, wrists, and ankles, authorities said. She was last seen alive on her birthday, January 28, 2018.
The state is expected to use DNA, cell phone data, and surveillance footage against Pardon. Investigators said he had her debit card.
Pardon was set to serve as his own attorney at trial, but he walked back that decision.
In a letter to the court, he previously complained about his attorneys, saying that he was told there’s no chance he could win because “this is a white man’s city. They are not going to let you get off with killing that white woman.” The defendant is black. Anderson was white.
In his letter, the defendant said his lawyers told him the best they could do is try to keep him off death row.
Nonetheless, Pardon wrote a letter in December to WBNS. He insisted that he really did know her and that he was in her apartment getting high with her. The defendant insisted on his innocence. Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney Ron O’Brien said there’s no evidence Pardon and Anderson knew each other.
The defendant’s criminal history of adjudicated, violent, sexual crimes dates back even to his teens.
#AnthonyPardon #PardonTrial
Have I missed a bit? The end of last episode on the playlist Deborah Pardon was taking the stand... what happened?
Sorry, but I would object to this witness as an “expert,” as well.
If you haven’t yet look up her wiki murder of Rachael Anderson, she is beautiful
thought i heard them call his sister on the last video just before it ended, was it not recorded?
Are they going to charge his sister as well?
In exchange for a truthful testimony, no
Seriously doubt that she probably received a plea deal to testify against her brother.
At first I smirked when defense wanted to reject her as an expert. Then she started talking about technical stuff, and sorry there is too much wrong. Among others, she talked about Facebook Info being "Open Source" which is wrong for most information there, confused "manually" with "physically" , stated that "the site is the tower" and it goes on. She may have been nervous, but if that was an interview I wouldn't hire her.
niksxr I feel like she just looked at phone records and then looked up google maps. They could have used anyone to do this. She doesn’t seem like a tech specialist at all. For this highly important part of the evidence they really should have used a forensic cell phone expert.
Completely agree.