12:15 im an architecture student, this is called passive cooling design. it is really efficient in keeping cool as it considers the lighting and ventilation. the thing is not everyone knows about it and/or can afford such set up. im not from india so i can not say, but my country does not provide subsidy unfortunately.
I new a guy who built his house out of a log cabin kit. the house was so super insulated that it required little heating And cooling. Next to that a dirt berm house would be very energy efficient.
we need to be half on grid, half off , solar to run our low loads, lights and small chargers , these days our old 100watt bulbs are now only 13watts of led , so its big savings in energy just to swap all your bulbs out
i am an architect student too. I learned many things in this video Speaker's humor and metaphor is one of the reason for watching without getting bored'
I'm new in this area of energy-efficient buildings and it's quite interesting that such remarkable solutions approach to show nearly zero energy buildings even net zero energy buildings (NZEB) is possible
In China, Singapore , Southeast Asia its possible to have these infrastructures.. but India they are just good at talking but cannot deliver or work. If you don't believe, you go and work in India and see for yourself.
This is why we should have these sort of systems everywhere, I use solar lights in my garden and for Xmas and solar lights for my shed, why not safe on electricity when we can and find ways we can ston from using unneeded energy resources
The wild fires are made much larger and out of control because everything is so dry. There isn't enough moisture in the soil, there isn't enough moisture in the vegetation. One thing we need to do is move water from the ocean back inland to places we need it. The natural water cycle can't refill aquifers that were filled thousands of years ago by melting glaciers after the last ice age. Big problems need big solutions. The biggest idea I am trying to express is tunneling aqueducts from the coast, in this case the west coast of the USA inland to feed combination geothermal power and sea water desalination plants. The idea seems to be so big that no one has considered it possible but I believe it is not only possible but it is necessary. For over a century the fossil water contained in aquifers has been pumped out to feed agriculture, industry and municipal water needs. The natural water cycle cant refill fossil water deposits that were filled 10,000 years ago when the glaciers melted after the last ice age. Without refilling these aquifers there is not much of a future for the region of the United states. As a result ground levels in some areas of the San Joaquin Valley have subsided by more than 30 feet. Similar fossil water depletion is happening in other regions all around the world. TBM and tunneling technology has matured and further developments in the industry are poised to speed up the tunneling process and it's these tunnels that are the only way to move large volumes of water from the ocean inland. The water is moved inland to areas where it can be desalinated in geothermal plants producing clean water and power. In many cases the water will recharge surface reservoirs where it will be used first to make more hydro power before being released into rivers and canal systems. It's very important however to not stop tunneling at these first stops but to continue several legs until the water has traveled from the ocean under mountain ranges to interior states. Along the way water will flow down grade through tunnels and rise in geothermal loops to fill mountain top pumped hydro batteries several times before eventually recharging several major aquifers. What I am proposing is essentially reversing the flow of the Colorado River Compact. Bringing water from the coast of California first to mountaintop reservoirs then to the deserts of Nevada and Arizona and on to Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming. This big idea looks past any individual city or states problems and looks at the whole and by using first principles identifies the actual problem and only solution. Thank you for your time, I would like the opportunity to explain in further detail and answer any questions. A better future is possible,
I'm sorry to be the one that ruin the fable of renowables but from the Kioto agreements in 1992 our use of fossil energy globally dropped from 98% in 1992 to... 98%in 2018... Exactly all the money invested didn't reduce our use of fossil fuels at all. Moreover solar energy is highly inefficient, because you know there is the night, the clouds and many other factors starting from the costs for energy unit. The only clean energy source we have is the hydroelectric one, we used the solar energy for millenia (using plants and animals) but only after fossil energy we could develop the advanced technologies that permit to you to view this documentaries on your smartphone A realistic approach would be the use of nuclear energy building the new 4th generation of nuclear power plants
12:15 im an architecture student, this is called passive cooling design. it is really efficient in keeping cool as it considers the lighting and ventilation. the thing is not everyone knows about it and/or can afford such set up. im not from india so i can not say, but my country does not provide subsidy unfortunately.
*"Nice courtesy service lady, not included"*
How much with the service lady included?
Thanks!
I new a guy who built his house out of a log cabin kit. the house was so super insulated that it required little heating And cooling. Next to that a dirt berm house would be very energy efficient.
Good Work! Hume ye video dekh kar assignment karna pad raha hai. Please Description mei Strategies daal do
Tumhe v karna pad rha h?
@@shubhamnegi7704 TUMHE BHI ?
Yes .........@@skandhan6706 tumhe bhi ?
informative and funny. Excellent Video. Thanx
That's a nice change of pace, from 'hey guys, welcome to my TH-cam channel' to, ' we're all doomed'
we need to be half on grid, half off , solar to run our low loads, lights and small chargers , these days our old 100watt bulbs are now only 13watts of led , so its big savings in energy just to swap all your bulbs out
i am an architect student too. I learned many things in this video
Speaker's humor and metaphor is one of the reason for watching without getting bored'
I like Michael Lumsden's narration. And the documentary of course.
I'm new in this area of energy-efficient buildings and it's quite interesting that such remarkable solutions approach to show nearly zero energy buildings even net zero energy buildings (NZEB) is possible
In China, Singapore , Southeast Asia its possible to have these infrastructures.. but India they are just good at talking but cannot deliver or work. If you don't believe, you go and work in India and see for yourself.
Apartment
Well said.
This is why we should have these sort of systems everywhere, I use solar lights in my garden and for Xmas and solar lights for my shed, why not safe on electricity when we can and find ways we can ston from using unneeded energy resources
Do you still use it ? Does it work good for you
It's a great initiative. I will also prefer greenery.
Narrator throwing shade at every opportunity like pew! pew! LOL
good idea and is also saving the planet
10:47 that's their goal - to reach the moon. All they could think of stacking a lot of engineers on top of each other 😂
Great information.
The wild fires are made much larger and out of control because everything is so dry. There isn't enough moisture in the soil, there isn't enough moisture in the vegetation. One thing we need to do is move water from the ocean back inland to places we need it. The natural water cycle can't refill aquifers that were filled thousands of years ago by melting glaciers after the last ice age. Big problems need big solutions.
The biggest idea I am trying to express is tunneling aqueducts from the coast, in this case the west coast of the USA inland to feed combination geothermal power and sea water desalination plants. The idea seems to be so big that no one has considered it possible but I believe it is not only possible but it is necessary. For over a century the fossil water contained in aquifers has been pumped out to feed agriculture, industry and municipal water needs. The natural water cycle cant refill fossil water deposits that were filled 10,000 years ago when the glaciers melted after the last ice age. Without refilling these aquifers there is not much of a future for the region of the United states. As a result ground levels in some areas of the San Joaquin Valley have subsided by more than 30 feet. Similar fossil water depletion is happening in other regions all around the world. TBM and tunneling technology has matured and further developments in the industry are poised to speed up the tunneling process and it's these tunnels that are the only way to move large volumes of water from the ocean inland. The water is moved inland to areas where it can be desalinated in geothermal plants producing clean water and power. In many cases the water will recharge surface reservoirs where it will be used first to make more hydro power before being released into rivers and canal systems. It's very important however to not stop tunneling at these first stops but to continue several legs until the water has traveled from the ocean under mountain ranges to interior states. Along the way water will flow down grade through tunnels and rise in geothermal loops to fill mountain top pumped hydro batteries several times before eventually recharging several major aquifers. What I am proposing is essentially reversing the flow of the Colorado River Compact. Bringing water from the coast of California first to mountaintop reservoirs then to the deserts of Nevada and Arizona and on to Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming. This big idea looks past any individual city or states problems and looks at the whole and by using first principles identifies the actual problem and only solution.
Thank you for your time, I would like the opportunity to explain in further detail and answer any questions.
A better future is possible,
great work i will do my part
NICE VIDEO
Nibbe
Sorry dude no hate but the background music takes the seriösity
Keep up the good work!
Amazing!!!
amazing
i love the translators humor
Energy Efficient Buildings will be useful. especially houses.
Nice fuel cell
👍👍👍
vastukala wale like
karo
Dhoom
How can different cryptocurrencies affect global energy developments? Why should we care? #crypto #development #livetree
wowwwww
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💛💛💛💛💛💚💚💚💚💚
Iron Matrix
Just get a few pounds of potatoes to make electricity for you!! Green!!
I'm sorry to be the one that ruin the fable of renowables but from the Kioto agreements in 1992 our use of fossil energy globally dropped from 98% in 1992 to... 98%in 2018... Exactly all the money invested didn't reduce our use of fossil fuels at all.
Moreover solar energy is highly inefficient, because you know there is the night, the clouds and many other factors starting from the costs for energy unit.
The only clean energy source we have is the hydroelectric one, we used the solar energy for millenia (using plants and animals) but only after fossil energy we could develop the advanced technologies that permit to you to view this documentaries on your smartphone
A realistic approach would be the use of nuclear energy building the new 4th generation of nuclear power plants
Hi first
Comments
Wow!!!!
The scarce europe ethically melt because february thessaly record from a maddening deal. ultra, yummy garden
Twently sintex