Economic Illiteracy of Trump and Harris | Independent Outlook 64

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @margiehankins-jerde6094
    @margiehankins-jerde6094 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think Trump understands exactly what tariffs do.

  • @markford5198
    @markford5198 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    REDUCING CORPORATE TAXES WILL BRING PRICES DOWN AND UNEMPLOYMENT DOWN

  • @margiehankins-jerde6094
    @margiehankins-jerde6094 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who is going to qualify for these homes? Are they no interest loans. Makes no sense

  • @OOCASHFLOW
    @OOCASHFLOW 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let Phil talk. You kept cutting him off and not giving him time

  • @aliendroneservices6621
    @aliendroneservices6621 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    19:04 "I would definitely like to reduce the spending of the federal government."
    The only way to do that is to *_use UBI as a bargaining chip,_* in exchange for adopting a brick-wall spending cap.

    • @benicia21
      @benicia21 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      if you want to destroy the concept of fiat currency having value, UBI is a great way to accomplish that!

    • @jkenwell
      @jkenwell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      UBI would result in hyper inflation and much more rapid devaluation of the currency which is already made from nothing and then would even blow up the entire illusion currently still largely maintained.

  • @uhlijohn
    @uhlijohn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Richard Nixon: Wage and price controls......lay the blame at Nixon's door.

  • @jkenwell
    @jkenwell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who is economically illiterate? The candidates or their audience?

    • @DeepsongProductions
      @DeepsongProductions 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The audience has no influence whatsoever on gov policy... hence they are effectively irrelevant

    • @jkenwell
      @jkenwell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@DeepsongProductions I mean, they say things that influence the voters. The economically illiterate don't become billionaires.

    • @DeepsongProductions
      @DeepsongProductions 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jkenwell
      Good point... ciao

  • @goa9034
    @goa9034 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trump economic illiteracy...🤡🤣
    These 3 checked 2017 to 2019???

  • @margiehankins-jerde6094
    @margiehankins-jerde6094 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What harris did was put pot smoker in in jail for longer sentences to provide free labor for the state. Come to California on the new new bail laws for illegal immigrants. She was a horrible prosecutor. They are blaming parents now for crimes kids do.

  • @thomasbentele2468
    @thomasbentele2468 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was a combination of a public serving banking system
    and extended tariffs to protect the German economy in the Kaiserreich.
    Worked great.
    3 to 5 percent tax quote.
    For example the income tax in USA only had to be implemented,
    to sustainably pay back the interests and so on to the privat debt money creators,
    and subsidies to their cronies, and gradually change to a more centralistic state.
    Oh well, they always tell, it was for the war. But the wars ended long time ago.
    Yes the Empire needs the FED too.
    With the credit system before and also trade tarifs that helped America
    income taxe an many other taxes didn't even exist.
    A point, where the Independent institute seems to strictly stick to "private bankers economics".
    I absolutely dont suppose corruption, but wished some new thoughts about the Kaiserreich
    and all the other spaces and times in history, when Fridrich Lists economy was implied.
    By the way, I heard in Asia Fridrich List is widely studied. Why not in the west?

    • @jkenwell
      @jkenwell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The income tax was instituted before there was debt, but the system was already planned to be moved into the control of a handful of private interests. Slow but methodical, they didn't complete the transfer from Congress to the Bankers until they finally decoupled the dollar from gold.

    • @thomasbentele2468
      @thomasbentele2468 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jkenwell Oh complicated.
      I thought 1913 was the FED Bill.
      The decoupling from gold was 1973.
      Its more complicated.
      Have to read your comment more often.
      Im Kaiserreich,
      it was Germany allowed to grow strong to smash both biggest enemies of the finance,
      Russia and Germany. Bismarck the fox understood it well, and to the best of both counties he encouraged all kind of cooperation
      and even the Kaiser "Times' Friedenkaiser" did everything to avoid the war. But what can you do.
      Money rules the world and the war started. So the history of the Kaiserreich is also more complicated.

    • @jkenwell
      @jkenwell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thomasbentele2468 international finance is a hydra moving behind the curtains. One country after the other gets conquered, beginning with Britain.
      Your comment about Bismarck is well taken. One further attempt was made by the name that shall not be named, to destroy the influence of the international bankers, which probably had a great influence on the events that were to follow.

    • @thomasbentele2468
      @thomasbentele2468 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jkenwell Yes. So true.

  • @MatthewSapa
    @MatthewSapa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    your government ended the world

  • @MatthewSapa
    @MatthewSapa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    youre on too much blood, youre clones