If you enjoy our work please subscribe to our main channel The People Profiles www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member... Patreon: www.patreon.com/thepeopleprofiles Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peopleprofiles TH-cam Membership: th-cam.com/channels/D6TPU-PvTMvqgzC_AM7_uA.htmljoin or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles
Katherine of Aragon was named after her great-grandmother, Katherine of Lancaster - daughter of John of Gaunt and his second wife, Infanta Constance of Castile. Henry VII also descended from John of Gaunt by his third wife, Katherine Swynford. John of Gaunt was son of King Edward III. Technically speaking, Katherine of Aragon had a stronger claim to the throne of England than her father in law, Henry VII
This is not true. Henry took Richard's crown by killing him. No Plantagenet had a claim to a Tudor crown except by conquest. Especially no Plantagenet woman, ever, as they couldn't reign only bequeath their father's claim to their sons.
It’s wonderful to read some speaking of Katherine Swinford, my very favourite royal. Very little is known about her but I do have a novel about her life written as as story of her life. I think she is buried in Lincoln cathedral.
It is *absolutely INACCURATE* to say that “a liaison with the King could compromise Anne Boleyn’s future marriage prospects.” Both Bessie Blount *and* Anne’s own sister, Mary, had been royal mistresses, and were well-wed afterward at the King’s “encouragement.” Both seem to have lived wealthy, comfortable lives.
Henry had one child with Lady Blount and she was highly regarded for that, because it proved Henry was capable of fathering male children. Henry Fitzroy was acknowledged by Henry, exhibited at least once at court and eventually made a Duke.
No. Mary was not well wed after Henry. She was married when he met her. Her husband died not long after her time with Henry ended. She later eloped for her second marriage, for which Anne banned her from Court for a time. She got very lucky to have ended up with the obscure country life. And Bessie died in her 30s of the same consumption that took Henry Fitzroy.
Wolseley was too good at his job and became an object of great jealousy to other nobles. It was up to Henry V111 to curtail any actions which Cromwell was pushing too fast. When Cromwell began to realise he had many enemies, he also found that he had no protector, which should have been the king. Cromwell’s actions and plans for Anne Boleyn’s and her family’s downfall showed the true desperation of how unsafe he was feeling. In this entire sad and tragic saga was Henry who had an agenda of his own and Cromwell who was desperate to regain a grasp on his life and kings favour… thus resorted to drastic measures to please his mercurial ways. Cromwell was brilliant and would have been wise to keep more of a low down on his ambitions. I don’t condone some of his actions, however as a puppet of his unhinged king… he did what he did to survive, remembering Wolseley’ swift fall from grace.
Anne Boleyn DID attend her trial and she was visibly pregnant at their wedding ceremony, as per primary sources. All the dissolved marriages were annulments not divorces
Thank you very much! One thinks one knows just about everything there is to know to a layman, but thanks to educators like you we learn more and more about these amazing people who shaped the great country we live in. And yet, he was a human and nothing human was alien to him..
A highly overrated dynasty who thrived on issues of entitlement, paranoia, spoilt, bad tempers and the knowledge they were really not of the closest bloodline to the throne.
@@Elise-jz7nm well as a historian, you would know that they were very important and were the reason the UK is what it is today. It's not overrated. It's interesting for a reason
Future viewers: the 1st half+ is about Henry VIII. The last 1 hour is about Cromwell, & you don’t have to have seen the 1st hour+ to follow the last hour about Cromwell.
It seems very likely that Henry VIII had McLeod syndrome, being Kell antigen positive, a rare genetic disease. This meant his wives were essentially 'allergic' to him (his sperm and fluids) resulting in deformities, miscarriages,, stillbirth or very small sickly children, unlikely to live beyond a few weeks or months. That he had any children at all that survived is probably close to miraculous. Mary was notoriously frail and sickly all her life and also infertile.
Not sure if they had that but they were notoriously inbrêd atp. That’s why they struggle to conceive, and the most of the ones they had didn’t last very long.
What do I think of Henry 8th? A self-centred, tyrannical and deeply destructive bully. Plenty of people live with chronic pain but they don't all behave with such callous disregard for everything and everyone around them. I suspect history would have been very different had Arthur not died, or better yet, had Henry Tudor not triumphed at Bosworth field!
Ann Boleyn was used by her family to get a prominent position in the court. Her sister Mary had been a mistress before so it was important to insure that Ann stayed a virgin until marriage.
@@GradKat…you’re right, I’m surprised how many people take these accounts quite literally, unable to differentiate between historical truth and fiction.
Wolsey when he was dying is supposed to have said: If I had served my God as I have served my King, he would not have abandoned me in this my infirmary.
Considering Henry had so many wives. I would say Henry had some sort of sexually transmitted disease. At first you can say it’s Catherine then it’s Anne. But it’s a stretch to say all 6 was the women. Remember Edward was a very sick child and his first boy out of marriage died of sickness too. His seed was diseased in some way. Syphilis is often theorised
There is also a theory that his blood type was one of those tricky ones which, if it meets a group antagonistic to it, creates either very weak offspring, or causes miscarriage. In these instances a first child may survive, but each succeeding pregnancy becomes more fraught.
usually the blood type problem is carried by the mother. @elizabethannegrey6285 If mom is Rh negative and child is positive for instance. The mother has to bear for 9 months and that's how her blood would fight against the baby's Not the father. He is not bearing the child
A great show and so much appreciated information, does anyone know why there was so many infant deaths and miscarriages? Was there a reason why the ladies would have miscarriages like taking some sort of medication that would make them more prone to miscarriage? Thank you.
There were probably at least two major things at play and one more minor. First, I believe the theory is that Henry was Kell positive in terms of his blood group, which is rare and can cause an antagonistic immune response in women and fetuses that are Kell negative. (Take that all those idiots who blamed these issues on the ladies.) A first pregnancy can go largely without trouble, but subsequent pregnancies tend to be plagued with issues unless the fetus miraculously inherits the recessive Kell positivity. This seems to fit the pattern that played out. Second, Tudor England was horrible in terms of its understanding of pregnancy and what pregnant women and children in utero need. Very little in the way of rest and recuperation between pregnancies and a bad understanding of nutrition...especially the value of fruits and vegetables in the diet. Finally, there was the issue of mental health. These poor women were under incredible pressure in terms of their lifestyle, constant public scrutiny, pressure to provide an heir, and private emotional turmoil dealing with Henry and all kinds of other things. At the time, any issue with a pregnancy was blamed on the woman. That kind of stress and pressure is not kind on mothers or developing children. And fatally, in the case of Anne Boleyn, there was the shock of Henry's jousting accident, which probably caused her to miscarry a fetus that was, reportedly, a boy.
I thoroughly enjoyed the novel., It was so real as if I was watching the episode play out. I know years of research went into the plot. Just hope C don't foul up with inappropriate casting in some style. I'll just switch off if they do as I'm not prepared to spoil the enjoyment I had in reading it.
*@darrenjurme7231* ✨ Ha! I'd read your comment before I'd seen what you were referring to so was watching carefully so not to miss it. Alas, im as bewildered as you, *i had expected a picture or painting from a totally different era but didn't expect that* - at first i thought it was to signify 'a *thawing of the ice* ' but that doesn't fit with the narrative of events at that time, so i too am at a loss. If you ever figure it out plz let me know, as i will you if i find out, as unlikely as it seems.! 🕊️ ☘️
El locutor no ha parado de equivocarse con los numeros, diciendo Enrique 8 cuando se trataba de Enrique 7, el padre. Otro dia pongan no le pongan numeros romanos, para que no se confunda. Mejor ponganselos asi como los he puesto aqui, que son los habituales en nuestros dias. Gracias por su atencion.
Anne Boleyn was beheaded on the 19th of May , not the 31st. Other than that , i love the video, and I am obsessed with the Tudors and the Plantagenets.😊💜
Elizabeth I should have had JamesI change his last name to Tudor when she gave him the throne and that would have taken care of the pesky dynasty problem
I purchased the BBC docu miniseries ‘Wolf Hall.’ I never saw it on my local PBS channel; they often do not show some of their productions for some reason(s) which CR is a suspect, I suppose. Well done, as more often is for the BBC. I look forward to TPP and use them over again as something to drift off to sleep with. Well done you, thanks!
It was on tonight on our PBS station. Northern Michigan. Check your local listings. Tomorrow I will see if it's on demand so I can watch missed episodes.
@ Thank you, it’s good to know they do air it. But I have the DVD set so I can watch it any time. I thought it would be like ‘Birdsong,’ not available to view in the US. I bought that too! Love a lot of the BBC productions, and I Roku a lot. I’m about to cut that cord and Roku/app everything. Why pay a hundred a month for cable when there’s nothing on. I only use a couple of channels so it’s a waste, especially with Roku.
@@mynamedoesntmatter8652absolutely. TH-cam has lots of free movies and shows. I enjoy Tubi... and even Fandango... Cranford is presently free. Cable really isn't great anymore. We lost several movie channels in the past year... including TCM. Pretty miserable as we've been paying for cable since about 1970...and getting less and less. And they wonder why folks are dropping it for the streaming services.
this has always been my thought - she was probably repulsed by him - I wish she had gone on to marry a nobleman and had four big, lusty sons - what a sock in the puss that would have been.
He didn't fancy her she got a few Bob out off it and kept her head her matchmaker Cromwell wasn't so lucky cathrine parr was lucky as well if she wouldn't have denounced her faith and grovelled to Henry fir her life she was next for the chopping block
A massive whitewash of Cromwell's vicious crimes. He destroyed England's archetectural heritage by physically destroying hundreds of beautiful monastic buildings, looting the thousands of priceless works of art within them, and destroying the even more priceless written records contained in them, which dated back all the way to the Anglo-Saxon period. Everything from wills, contracts, land grants and literary masterpieces lost forever. Tens of thousands of monks and tens of thousands of the invalids and chronically ill that the monks had cared for in the monasteries were dumped onto the roads with no employment or means of support and the sick left to die without anyone to care for them. This was Cromwell's "humane" care for the poor. His strengthening of British rule in Ireland led to 500 years of Anglo-Irish conflict which is still ongoing today. When Henry had no more need for Cromwell's services he had him executed. That is what tyrants always do with their secret poplice chiefs when their services are no longer required. It is always dangerous for a tyrant to let their hatchet men live once their work is complete, since they may then conspire with the tyrant's surviving enemies.
Los muros de las rosas? Las Guerras de las Rosas!!!!! Ha confundido Wars (guerras, en ingles) con Walls (paredes, en ingles)!!!!! Favor trabajen con gente que sea un poco mas entendida.
Que mala crónica, te pasas diciendo "Enrique VIII , padre de Enrique VIII" El padre de Enrique VIII fué Enrique VIII , lo cual solo mencionas una vez.. corrige tú crónica
D'aucuns n'a demandé à un HOMME d'être vierge, contrairement à un FEMME, qui se doit d'être pure et innocente, surtout en ses temps-là. Beaucoup de femmes étaient répudier même dans des classe inférieures, alors dans la royauté, c'était tout à fait impossible qu'une future épouse ne soit pas chaste.
Un récit historique fort intéressant, mais une grande déception par la personne qui fait la traduction en français. Sauf vôtre respect, pourriez-vous à l'avenir essayer de prononcer les noms de famille, entre autres mots, mal dites, correctement, cela serait fort aimable de vôtre part. MERCI.
Just too bad about the millions who died before he came to our planet, huh? Through no fault of their own, they never heard his message, so I guess they're burning in hell for ever
Why do you call Richard III a usurper when he was asked by parlement to be king. And why keep saying that he killed the two princess when there is no evidence of their death.
Well, you don't need a body or direct witnesses to prove that a crime was committed. Circumstantial evidence that they "disappeared" during his watch, and there weren't any sightings of them by any credible human. Add in the fact that the motive is clearly beyond a reasonable doubt with logical deductive reasoning skills.
@ But you do need proof and there is no proof at all. Not of a murder nor who would be a murderer.The only thing we know is that nobody saw them anymore. This means you can’t accuse somebody until proven. And why would he kill the princess but not the son of his brother Clarence.Sorry but your answer doesn’t convince me at all.They could have vanished for a good reason.
Richard III was tasked with the Prince's protection by his brother Edward IV. Given that fact he is responsible for their deaths, directly or indirectly. Also given he was their "protector" only he could have ordered their deaths. He's 100 per cent guilty.
@ yes he was the protector but that does not proof that the two princess died. He was responsible for them but also doesn’t proof that he killed them. We have absolutely not a single piece of evidence of murder. If we would do this nowadays we could be going to court for slender. We don’t know what happened to them and that is final. You can’t call someone a murderer without proof. That is the problem with most historians there like parrots if one is saying it they all do. A protector was the protector of the country not the king. It was his job to fight for the country instead of the king because he was to young. It has nothing to do with a personal bodyguard of the king.
Pity Henry VIII didn't read his Latin Bble a bit better, especially Roman 3:23 'For all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God'. Unfortunately, I cannot say that in Lstin just yet, but I will find out asap!
Le lecteur en français est un vrai désastre et enlève toute crédibilité au texte et au contexte. On dirait un automate ! Et puis couvrir cette période très tourmentée est trop brève. On s'adresse à des enfants ?
If you enjoy our work please subscribe to our main channel The People Profiles www.youtube.com/@PeopleProfiles
For early access to our videos, discounted merch and many other exclusive perks please support us as a Patron or Member...
Patreon: www.patreon.com/thepeopleprofiles
Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/peopleprofiles
TH-cam Membership: th-cam.com/channels/D6TPU-PvTMvqgzC_AM7_uA.htmljoin
or follow us on Twitter! twitter.com/tpprofiles
Keep up the good work 😊😊😊
Calm down dear
What’s with the ads every 4 minutes?…
I can never pass up a Henry VIII video ❤❤
Katherine of Aragon was named after her great-grandmother, Katherine of Lancaster - daughter of John of Gaunt and his second wife, Infanta Constance of Castile.
Henry VII also descended from John of Gaunt by his third wife, Katherine Swynford. John of Gaunt was son of King Edward III. Technically speaking, Katherine of Aragon had a stronger claim to the throne of England than her father in law, Henry VII
It all gets super messy doesn’t it 😂
This is not true. Henry took Richard's crown by killing him. No Plantagenet had a claim to a Tudor crown except by conquest. Especially no Plantagenet woman, ever, as they couldn't reign only bequeath their father's claim to their sons.
It’s wonderful to read some speaking of Katherine Swinford, my very favourite royal. Very little is known about her but I do have a novel about her life written as as story of her life. I think she is buried in Lincoln cathedral.
The Hillary Mantel trilogy is captivating, may she rest in peace. I love the history of the royals. Thank you from Albuquerque, New Mexico.
I love Wolfhall my all time favorite trilogy!I have read the first 2 about a 100 times and never get tired of it. Thank you
I have a few books that I read almost every year.
Amazing story of intrigue!
Just now re-watching it what PBS offers and loving every minute!
It is *absolutely INACCURATE* to say that “a liaison with the King could compromise Anne Boleyn’s future marriage prospects.” Both Bessie Blount *and* Anne’s own sister, Mary, had been royal mistresses, and were well-wed afterward at the King’s “encouragement.” Both seem to have lived wealthy, comfortable lives.
Henry had one child with Lady Blount and she was highly regarded for that, because it proved Henry was capable of fathering male children. Henry Fitzroy was acknowledged by Henry, exhibited at least once at court and eventually made a Duke.
No. Mary was not well wed after Henry. She was married when he met her. Her husband died not long after her time with Henry ended. She later eloped for her second marriage, for which Anne banned her from Court for a time. She got very lucky to have ended up with the obscure country life. And Bessie died in her 30s of the same consumption that took Henry Fitzroy.
Wolseley was too good at his job and became an object of great jealousy to other nobles. It was up to Henry V111 to curtail any actions which Cromwell was pushing too fast.
When Cromwell began to realise he had many enemies, he also found that he had no protector, which should have been the king.
Cromwell’s actions and plans for Anne Boleyn’s and her family’s downfall showed the true desperation of how unsafe he was feeling.
In this entire sad and tragic saga was Henry who had an agenda of his own and Cromwell who was desperate to regain a grasp on his life and kings favour… thus resorted to drastic measures to please his mercurial ways.
Cromwell was brilliant and would have been wise to keep more of a low down on his ambitions.
I don’t condone some of his actions, however as a puppet of his unhinged king… he did what he did to survive, remembering Wolseley’ swift fall from grace.
But did you enjoy the video instead of imparting historical knowledge?
Anne Boleyn DID attend her trial and she was visibly pregnant at their wedding ceremony, as per primary sources. All the dissolved marriages were annulments not divorces
Was you there, as primary witness ?!
Thank you very much! One thinks one knows just about everything there is to know to a layman, but thanks to educators like you we learn more and more about these amazing people who shaped the great country we live in. And yet, he was a human and nothing human was alien to him..
I LOVE THESE TUDOR VIDEOS!!!!
A highly overrated dynasty who thrived on issues of entitlement, paranoia, spoilt, bad tempers and the knowledge they were really not of the closest bloodline to the throne.
@Elise-jz7nm why are you here then?😂
@ Because as an historian I watch different historical presentations, and am entitled to make an educated comment!
@@Elise-jz7nm well as a historian, you would know that they were very important and were the reason the UK is what it is today. It's not overrated. It's interesting for a reason
@@Elise-jz7nm Your historical education is not complete yet on the Tudors. Study Elizabeth I.
Future viewers: the 1st half+ is about Henry VIII. The last 1 hour is about Cromwell, & you don’t have to have seen the 1st hour+ to follow the last hour about Cromwell.
😅,; jump?
…
Bf,kli
Hence the real Wolf Hall x
And you don’t get much of Cromwell when he does appear.
Thank you
Cheers!
It seems very likely that Henry VIII had McLeod syndrome, being Kell antigen positive, a rare genetic disease. This meant his wives were essentially 'allergic' to him (his sperm and fluids) resulting in deformities, miscarriages,, stillbirth or very small sickly children, unlikely to live beyond a few weeks or months. That he had any children at all that survived is probably close to miraculous. Mary was notoriously frail and sickly all her life and also infertile.
Elizabeth also had no children, although she never married, but she may have had affairs during her life?
@@lynettesmith6971😂😂😂
Not sure if they had that but they were notoriously inbrêd atp. That’s why they struggle to conceive, and the most of the ones they had didn’t last very long.
Enjoyable update on your previous Henry 8th work.
Love your content guys ❤❤❤❤
What do I think of Henry 8th? A self-centred, tyrannical and deeply destructive bully. Plenty of people live with chronic pain but they don't all behave with such callous disregard for everything and everyone around them. I suspect history would have been very different had Arthur not died, or better yet, had Henry Tudor not triumphed at Bosworth field!
Ann Boleyn was used by her family to get a prominent position in the court. Her sister Mary had been a mistress before so it was important to insure that Ann stayed a virgin until marriage.
She wasn’t used by her family. That’s a Philippa Gregory novel.
@@GradKat…you’re right, I’m surprised how many people take these accounts quite literally, unable to differentiate between historical truth and fiction.
Thankyou so much for this...am currently listening to the Audiobook 'Wolf Hall...❤🎉
Wolf Hall now on
BBC I Player.
Thank you
Wolsey when he was dying is supposed to have said: If I had served my God as I have served my King, he would not have abandoned me in this my infirmary.
That was Wolsey
@@luckylogger7594 Would it have been infirmity and not infirmary?
@@mojojim6458 Infirmity.
Heh, very timely with the new series! 😁
The series began several years ago but now they are producing the second season. Can't wait!
Wow. There are some knowledgeable people out there. Some one could make a fine documentary just from the comments.
Well said, Sir 'Henry was never a Protestant, as Anglican is a 'High Catholic' Church.
Yes what we need is the real and complete story of why prince roland died strangely the complete and true story
Excellent,
Considering Henry had so many wives. I would say Henry had some sort of sexually transmitted disease. At first you can say it’s Catherine then it’s Anne. But it’s a stretch to say all 6 was the women. Remember Edward was a very sick child and his first boy out of marriage died of sickness too. His seed was diseased in some way. Syphilis is often theorised
There is also a theory that his blood type was one of those tricky ones which, if it meets a group antagonistic to it, creates either very weak offspring, or
causes miscarriage. In these instances a first child may survive, but each
succeeding pregnancy becomes more fraught.
@ you cannot create theories and prove them without speculation. But without evidence they are just that speculation whats the problem
I wonder if his DNA is still intact. If so. He could be exhumed & tested.
No evidence if syphilis
usually the blood type problem is carried by the mother. @elizabethannegrey6285 If mom is Rh negative and child is positive for instance. The mother has to bear for 9 months and that's how her blood would fight against the baby's Not the father. He is not bearing the child
Wolf Hall is on BBC
I player in the UK now.
The Battle if Stoke Field was actually the end of the so called Wars of the Roses.
Ohhh yeahhhh, just in time for a good NAP!!! 💤😴
Well done!
Been in Rochester castle where Henry first set eyes on Anne of Cleves ,what a place one of my favourite castles in the UK !
English explorer John Cabot was born Giovanni Caboto in Italy.
A great show and so much appreciated information, does anyone know why there was so many infant deaths and miscarriages? Was there a reason why the ladies would have miscarriages like taking some sort of medication that would make them more prone to miscarriage? Thank you.
There were probably at least two major things at play and one more minor. First, I believe the theory is that Henry was Kell positive in terms of his blood group, which is rare and can cause an antagonistic immune response in women and fetuses that are Kell negative. (Take that all those idiots who blamed these issues on the ladies.) A first pregnancy can go largely without trouble, but subsequent pregnancies tend to be plagued with issues unless the fetus miraculously inherits the recessive Kell positivity. This seems to fit the pattern that played out. Second, Tudor England was horrible in terms of its understanding of pregnancy and what pregnant women and children in utero need. Very little in the way of rest and recuperation between pregnancies and a bad understanding of nutrition...especially the value of fruits and vegetables in the diet. Finally, there was the issue of mental health. These poor women were under incredible pressure in terms of their lifestyle, constant public scrutiny, pressure to provide an heir, and private emotional turmoil dealing with Henry and all kinds of other things. At the time, any issue with a pregnancy was blamed on the woman. That kind of stress and pressure is not kind on mothers or developing children. And fatally, in the case of Anne Boleyn, there was the shock of Henry's jousting accident, which probably caused her to miscarry a fetus that was, reportedly, a boy.
@@stephaniechristensen6018 Read about the venereal diseases which genetically weakened the royals who had no idea of them.
I thoroughly enjoyed the novel., It was so real as if I was watching the episode play out. I know years of research went into the plot. Just hope C don't foul up with inappropriate casting in some style. I'll just switch off if they do as I'm not prepared to spoil the enjoyment I had in reading it.
Wolf Hall is wonderful
Just been watching Wolf Hall on PBS-WNEDTV
He did not compose "Greensleeves' however.
😂😂😂😂😂
What is going on @ 01:29:41 - 01:29:50 ??? What is that supposed to be??
*@darrenjurme7231* ✨ Ha! I'd read your comment before I'd seen what you were referring to so was watching carefully so not to miss it. Alas, im as bewildered as you, *i had expected a picture or painting from a totally different era but didn't expect that* - at first i thought it was to signify 'a *thawing of the ice* ' but that doesn't fit with the narrative of events at that time, so i too am at a loss. If you ever figure it out plz let me know, as i will you if i find out, as unlikely as it seems.! 🕊️ ☘️
I love your channel, but the dramatizations are ridiculous and unnecessary.
the most fall asleep to video on youtube
El locutor no ha parado de equivocarse con los numeros, diciendo Enrique 8 cuando se trataba de Enrique 7, el padre. Otro dia pongan no le pongan numeros romanos, para que no se confunda. Mejor ponganselos asi como los he puesto aqui, que son los habituales en nuestros dias. Gracias por su atencion.
Anne Boleyn was beheaded on the 19th of May , not the 31st. Other than that , i love the video, and I am obsessed with the Tudors and the Plantagenets.😊💜
19 of May my Birthday,
I don't know who s worse out off them 2 houses
Ana Bolena en espanol = Ann Boleyn en ingles. Nada de Bolin o Berlin como se oye aqui. Favor comprobar lecturas .
La parole de l'IA n'est pas assez fluide... Dommage.
À part cela, j'adore les documentaires historiques= 👍
St Brendan the Navigator found America in circa the 6th Century AD/CE
Elizabeth I should have had JamesI change his last name to Tudor when she gave him the throne and that would have taken care of the pesky dynasty problem
If Cromwell was around at the time of Henry V111,he wouldn’t be around long.
I purchased the BBC docu miniseries ‘Wolf Hall.’ I never saw it on my local PBS channel; they often do not show some of their productions for some reason(s) which CR is a suspect, I suppose. Well done, as more often is for the BBC.
I look forward to TPP and use them over again as something to drift off to sleep with. Well done you, thanks!
It was on tonight on our PBS station. Northern Michigan. Check your local listings. Tomorrow I will see if it's on demand so I can watch missed episodes.
@
Thank you, it’s good to know they do air it. But I have the DVD set so I can watch it any time. I thought it would be like ‘Birdsong,’ not available to view in the US. I bought that too! Love a lot of the BBC productions, and I Roku a lot. I’m about to cut that cord and Roku/app everything. Why pay a hundred a month for cable when there’s nothing on. I only use a couple of channels so it’s a waste, especially with Roku.
Hilary Mantel rocked.
@@mynamedoesntmatter8652absolutely. TH-cam has lots of free movies and shows. I enjoy Tubi... and even Fandango... Cranford is presently free. Cable really isn't great anymore. We lost several movie channels in the past year... including TCM. Pretty miserable as we've been paying for cable since about 1970...and getting less and less. And they wonder why folks are dropping it for the streaming services.
Wolf Hall is on BBC I player now in UK
10 episodes.
Hardly a doctrinal Catholic proclaiming himself not the Pope head of te Church
Solo means alone, as far as I am aware.
❤
Man! There are alot of Richardians in here
Henry Fitzroy. Not his fault he was born out of wedlock.
The smell off Henry VIII didn't help either 😂
Probably nobody noticed,every stunk in those days !
Maybe Anne of Cleves liked Henry VIII not.
this has always been my thought - she was probably repulsed by him - I wish she had gone on to marry a nobleman and had four big, lusty sons - what a sock in the puss that would have been.
He didn't fancy her she got a few Bob out off it and kept her head her matchmaker Cromwell wasn't so lucky cathrine parr was lucky as well if she wouldn't have denounced her faith and grovelled to Henry fir her life she was next for the chopping block
He also had syphallis
Uncertain and not established. Erectile Dysfunction certainly. Hypertension and Diabetes as well. But syphilis? Only a rumor.
Henry VIII was a brutal tyrant who should have been sentenced to the block!
Makes me think of trump and the way he acts
Nada que ver Enrique VIII con Oliver Cromwell, un Tudor y un Estuardo, y referente a Ricardo III ya se actualizo , nunca usurpó nada!!!
Employment by Henry VIII not healthy.
A massive whitewash of Cromwell's vicious crimes. He destroyed England's archetectural heritage by physically destroying hundreds of beautiful monastic buildings, looting the thousands of priceless works of art within them, and destroying the even more priceless written records contained in them, which dated back all the way to the Anglo-Saxon period. Everything from wills, contracts, land grants and literary masterpieces lost forever. Tens of thousands of monks and tens of thousands of the invalids and chronically ill that the monks had cared for in the monasteries were dumped onto the roads with no employment or means of support and the sick left to die without anyone to care for them. This was Cromwell's "humane" care for the poor. His strengthening of British rule in Ireland led to 500 years of Anglo-Irish conflict which is still ongoing today. When Henry had no more need for Cromwell's services he had him executed. That is what tyrants always do with their secret poplice chiefs when their services are no longer required. It is always dangerous for a tyrant to let their hatchet men live once their work is complete, since they may then conspire with the tyrant's surviving enemies.
Sounds like Trump.
Nasty murderous thugs in high office.... Those poor women put to the axe.... And they have the cheek to claim support to a Christian church
That was Oliver Cromwell, not Thomas.
Thanx.........
@pamjoyner665 no thomas was 100 years ahead off his name sake but he did do similar stuff a right pair off bar stewards burn in hell both off you
Was he a Barrister?
冒頭で何度も、ヘンリー八世の父ヘンリー七世をヘンリー八世と呼んでいる。間違えてるよ。
Catherine did produce an heir. Mary.
He was a sinner like the rest of us.
Are you suggesting I'm a fat ,rich, murdering tyrant. How dare you...😅
Los muros de las rosas? Las Guerras de las Rosas!!!!! Ha confundido Wars (guerras, en ingles) con Walls (paredes, en ingles)!!!!! Favor trabajen con gente que sea un poco mas entendida.
Was the sweating sickness a very bad flu or something.
No one knows. It's suspected to have been a hantavirus of some type, but nothing's certain.
@MLA56 thanks
Possibly maleria?
I am very distantly related to Katherine Parr
Parliament 😊lol
Ask what?
Excellent narration and no awful, American, nasal fry to assault my ear drums.
If you don’t like the awful American voice. Try not listening……
I can guarantee us Americans won’t miss you or your ignorant comments…..
Que mala crónica, te pasas diciendo "Enrique VIII , padre de Enrique VIII"
El padre de Enrique VIII fué Enrique VIII , lo cual solo mencionas una vez.. corrige tú crónica
Very little about Cromwell. False advertisement.
Maybe Anne of Cleves liked Henry VIII not. Henry VIII was far from a virgin himself. Such hypocracy!
Why didn't Henry VIII's doctors tell him, he was dying?
D'aucuns n'a demandé à un HOMME d'être vierge, contrairement à un FEMME, qui se doit d'être pure et innocente, surtout en ses temps-là. Beaucoup de femmes étaient répudier même dans des classe inférieures, alors dans la royauté, c'était tout à fait impossible qu'une future épouse ne soit pas chaste.
2 Sacraments Dr Martin Luther said.
Un récit historique fort intéressant, mais une grande déception par la personne qui fait la traduction en français. Sauf vôtre respect, pourriez-vous à l'avenir essayer de prononcer les noms de famille, entre autres mots, mal dites, correctement, cela serait fort aimable de vôtre part. MERCI.
Nor Anglican/Church of England
You cannot buy forgiveness from your sins, when Jesus Christ freely shed His Precious Blood at a great cost, His own life!
Who is this Jesus guy? What's his backstory?
@@ronthered138Must have gone to crap school.
Just too bad about the millions who died before he came to our planet, huh? Through no fault of their own, they never heard his message, so I guess they're burning in hell for ever
How many is Jesus Christ killed in horrendous ways ,the world could do without him !
Santus might mean holy 😇❤️🙏
Sanctus is Latin and means Holy.
Sanctus, Sanctus, Sanctus Dominus Deus Sabaoth. Latin hymn
C'est pas possible ces docus avec voix ia😮😮😮😮
What a horrible horrible man, Henry VIII truely was!
In his final years he became unbearable.
Truly obnoxious bounder and cad.
Te equivocas a menudo el padre era Enrique Vll y repites una y otra vez Enrique Vlll
Deo Graicias means thank God
Why do you call Richard III a usurper when he was asked by parlement to be king. And why keep saying that he killed the two princess when there is no evidence of their death.
Well, you don't need a body or direct witnesses to prove that a crime was committed. Circumstantial evidence that they "disappeared" during his watch, and there weren't any sightings of them by any credible human. Add in the fact that the motive is clearly beyond a reasonable doubt with logical deductive reasoning skills.
@ But you do need proof and there is no proof at all. Not of a murder nor who would be a murderer.The only thing we know is that nobody saw them anymore. This means you can’t accuse somebody until proven. And why would he kill the princess but not the son of his brother Clarence.Sorry but your answer doesn’t convince me at all.They could have vanished for a good reason.
Richard III was tasked with the Prince's protection by his brother Edward IV. Given that fact he is responsible for their deaths, directly or indirectly. Also given he was their "protector" only he could have ordered their deaths. He's 100 per cent guilty.
@@PeopleProfilesExtraagreed.
@ yes he was the protector but that does not proof that the two princess died. He was responsible for them but also doesn’t proof that he killed them. We have absolutely not a single piece of evidence of murder. If we would do this nowadays we could be going to court for slender. We don’t know what happened to them and that is final. You can’t call someone a murderer without proof. That is the problem with most historians there like parrots if one is saying it they all do. A protector was the protector of the country not the king. It was his job to fight for the country instead of the king because he was to young. It has nothing to do with a personal bodyguard of the king.
Henry VIII was a absolutely hypocrite!
Who isn’t !
The ancestor of Oliver Cromwell was involved with Henry VIII politically?
Yes.
Great uncle or something like that.
Nothing great about that name Cromwell burn in hell both off them
Its the right name WOLF HALL I bet he was a royal serial killer
he was a right bunt!
La traduction est très mauvaise en plus d'une voix monocorde 😠
Tu información tiene algunos errores.... verifícalo
I know from personal experience that pain can make one mean. Henry was still a jerk. 😊
Series two should have been called Woke Hall!
Pity Henry VIII didn't read his Latin Bble a bit better, especially Roman 3:23 'For all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God'. Unfortunately, I cannot say that in Lstin just yet, but I will find out asap!
Ah Lstin...Latin Rhyming slang...😅
'Lord of Ireland' my foot!
Your foot is the Lord of Ireland... bloody hell...😂
Bloody Mary
Bloody Henry! It was a bloody time. Mary didn't have a monopoly on terror.
Am a fire starter
Why didn't Thomas Cromwwll have a legal degree a BLaws
Yes, he was a brutal tyrant.
Le lecteur en français est un vrai désastre et enlève toute crédibilité au texte et au contexte. On dirait un automate ! Et puis couvrir cette période très tourmentée est trop brève. On s'adresse à des enfants ?
Hands off the Republic of Ireland, thanks. Slán go fóill, Henry, a hOcht. Póg mo thóin/kiss my ass, Henry VIII 😂😅😊
You need to move on.
@londonlady227 move on from what exactly?
@londonlady227 ??? Kiss my ass
Lutheranism/Protestantism was not a new form of Christianity.
That kraut s got a lot to answer for the trouble he started
There are a lot of people in these comments section spelling favourite, incorrect, I can only assume they are yanks.
"incorrectly", it's an adverb, not an adjective. And yes, we don't believe in wasting letters.