What Will Future Tanks Look Like?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- With War Thunder releasing its April Fools Warfare 2077 event, I figured now would be a good time to cap off the "Future Tank Weaponry" video series, since it never really got a proper end. I'll be talking about what future armored fighting vehicles might look like, what guns they might use, what engines, etc. This is, of course, all speculation, but it is interesting to think about what technology tanks could end up using.
Check the channel "About" section for the link to the creator of my profile picture.
Songs used (in order from first to last):
Blade Runner (1997 game, Frank Klepacki) - Blade Runner Blues
Halo 3: ODST - Rain (Deference for Darkness)
Sound mods:
Epic Thunder (Pre-release)
Armored Warfare Crew Voices
Sponsor: apexgamingpcs....
Second channel: / @spookstoon
Patreon: www.patreon.co...
Twitter: / spookston
Reddit: /u/spookston
Discord: / discord
Twitch: / spookstonwt
Steam: goo.gl/BYQjC9
#warthunder #tanks #tankhistory
Sorry there was no Saturday video, I took a few days off. BTW when I was writing the script I forgot what the exact terminology was for the Spike's launch profile, it's lofting not vertical.
Is 2021 wt april fools event tank is good design?
95% of my kills were ammo explosions. I dont know a lot about ammo types, but shouldn't APFSDS rounds have, I donno, less explosive capability? In a modern MBT in War Thunder, a tank can have its ammo explode, but still be running. Only that the ammo is lost. Why in such futuristic and complex tanks do the same mechanics not apply?
@@timm.4824 That further explains my topic. Ammo explosions should be GREATLY lessened. Or as you said, completely mitigated. I think they kept it to balance the tank out, and not make it too OP.
Spookston best
@@CT--yv6rl that also mitigates the whole autoloader kaboom issue.
Clearly the future brings the D point, which is a huge step up from our current systems
The D point will be the only important point in the game
@@giornogiovanna5214 like the golden snitch. No matter how good your team does, if the other team captures the D point then they win.
The D point is quite from our past. There are those of us among your elders who have not yet forgotten the olden days.
@@Orangefan77 ATTACK THE D POINT!....I need to reduce the their ticketsss, we still can win it! LET G......*dead*
This event only showed me how annoying it would be to fight things like Armata and other vehicles with a remote turret
So like 5 tanks we see now lol
Well, part of the issue kind of feels like the breech is near non-existent. Shooting the turret from the front doesn't damage the gun internals as frequently as it should, at least to me.
@@TheAmazingCowpig The armor on the 2077 vehicles don't produce any shrapnel when hit, so you have to get a direct hit in order to damage the gun.
so...BMPT-72 might has a chance to be in the game then
@@moldypotato4656 fucking anti spall to the max
“If the BMP-3 or CV-90 were historically accurate”
They are historically accurate in real life, end of discussion.
@@Zigmmaaaaarrsssspeople die if they are killed
@@Zigmmaaaaarrssss "they actually aren't"
Hol up
I would like it if he talked instead of having to read a ton of text
If ammo rack hit all crews will 100% to die
Spook: spike missiles do already exist in real life
Me remembering april fools events usually let gaijin test new features: *(sweating profusely)*
Think this was a test mostly for APS and TV guided missiles whether that be spike idk.
Active protection.
Armata
BRUH
haha pereh go brr
im from the future there in the game
The name "minotaur" will forever be remembered by dose who grinded the event.
Ok but like fr tho xm8 or f4f because I want the f4f but xm8 looks fun lol
@@williewilson2250 get the f4f because german suffers.
@@williewilson2250 Do you fly planes ? Yes The f4 is for you
Do you enjoy tanks and are a good tanker ?
Then go for the xm8
@@Hanzzss I enjoy both air and tanks but i dont have a phantom yet the xm8 is such a interseting and unique vehicles.
@@Hanzzss I want the xm8 because it's interesting and I already got an f4e for US and it feels like cheating using the f4f to grind germany
These last 2 April fools events seem more like predictions rather than jokes.
they test their new stuff and if everyone hates it they can just say haha April joke
Ever since the pirate thunder where they tested naval combat, each year has just been a test for something. This year is probably TV guided missiles.
@@volatile100 or Aps
@@volatile100 or drones
@@speedkiller2128 I really liked the 2020 april fools, the space event aws fun as all hell and just really cool in general
Average player: futuristic, cool tank
Average Polish player: Kurwa PL01
Dokładnie, sam tego nie rozumiem xD
the pl01 can make its ir signiture look like a van
The evolution of warfare in 52 years be like:
Armor: If you cant see my armor, you cant see me
Ammo: cold war ammo, best ammo
And then a random KV-2 shows up and snipes you from across the Universe
the tanks in the future will be randomly generated
T̸̨̧̢̡̨̢̛̛̛̠̺̼̥̞̝̻̯͉̫̲͙̦͉͓̬̠̘͍̭̗̪̱͉̟̞̻͕̱̰͖̥͈͙͊͊̔̒̈̓̊̉͋̈́͂̽͗̈́̎͗͊̓́͑͊̈́̾̅̓̍͊̓̉͛̀̍͐̈́͆̈̈́̅̒̽̐̓̎̏̿̍͐͐͂̀͗̾͑̈́̔̐̓̊̎͋̅̃̈́̌́͂͐̓͌̆͆͊́͒͂̿̋̑̀̊̂̔͛̂͂̈̂̽̈́̀̉̓̄̉͛͗̎̄̒͆̅̀͐̀́̈̍̌̑̔͗̏̇͛̿͆̈́̀̋̽̒̕͘̕͘̚͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͠͝ą̴̡̡̡̨̛̛̛̛̫̰̦̺̘͈̠͎͎̜̤̳͙͔͍̭̼̦̼̼͖̬̯̗͖̗̩̻͔̯̝͎̹͎͖͙͈̤̘͕̻̓̍͛͑̈́̈̾̎͐͑̽̄̋́̀̉́͌̄́͊͊̔̅̈́̔̿̾͑͐̿̎̿͂̆̂͐̽̑̍͋͑̈̀̒̈́̍̊̽͛̌͂̀̈̽̇̎̂͋̓̔̔̑̃̊̄̓̃̄̃̔̉͌͛̾̅̀̋̉͒̄̔͊͛͒̔̊̒́̀͐̃̆͊͂́͆̀͑͑́͗̉̐̒͂͒̑͗̄͌̀̈̋̈́̃͊́̊̀̈́̄̍̿̆͑́͗͑̃̇̇̈̽̊͂̅̊̍́̀͒̈́̈́̄̍̽̑͂̏́͑͛͆͑̒̌́̈̃͂͊̋̾̔́̀̃̓͒̒̔͋̊̏̿͌͐̈́́̅̓͂̎̈̀̅̋̏́̉̓̀͗̏̈́̃̑̓͋̈́̎̌͂͐̏̏̀̕̚͘̚̕̕̕̚̕͜͜͝͠͝͝͠͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͠͝͝͝͠͝͠͝͝ͅͅn̶̨̡̡̧̨̡̛̛̛̛̛̛͇̮̙̰͎̜̥̭̘͍̺̫͖͙̫̗̤͍̟̞̖͖̻̟̰̥̝̝̟͕͍̩̲̳̰̭͓̖̞͓͇͎̰͓̩̩̮̙̱̟̺͙̯̜̹͍̬͕͓̗̮̪͙͖̥̹͚͕͉̯̼̰̳̫̖̭͚̥͙̺̘̘͇̜͖̖͇̯͙͚̳͖̹͉͙͈̝̤̘̳̜͚̠͙̥̰̮̰̭̹͓̯͚͊͆̽̌͑̊̎̈̋̈͐̑́̓̈̂̇̏͊̿̔̎̿͒̓̐͒̋͑̓̎̋̀̓̋̅̀̊̇́̀̓͗̈́͛̾̊̀̋̃͛̑̋̉̀̐̒̓́͗̾̌̾̈́̅͐̓̌̆̃́̏̊͒́͛̔̐̿̉́̓̽̅̿͂̂̆͗̆̿͋̈́̽̅͛̊̈́̂̇̂̂͒͆͋̈̆́͌̌̓͗͛̾̏̿͊̆͗͆́̀͒͋̋̑̎͗͐̄̓͐̋̊̑̓͛̃̀̀͊̍̓̊͒̑͋̃̇̀̆̃̔̈́̓͗̆̏͐͗͒̅̈́̍̆͐̐̎͆͗͆̄̔̅͐̅̈͌̀̈́̔̄̈́͐͐͊̎͆̂̿̀̀̾̎̓́́̌̎͐͛̑̈́̅̈́̀͐̊͐̈́̐̌̆͗̊̃̏͌͐̂̆̏́͐̽́͑͛̃̆͛͌͆̊͐̌̅̇̓̓́̿̈̃͑̋͘͘̚̚̕͘̚̚̕̕̚̕͘̕̕̚̚̕̕̕͘͘͝͝͠͝͝͠͝͠͝͠͠͠͠͝͝͝͠͠͝ͅͅͅͅͅḱ̶̨̡̛̛͈̱̺̞͎̳̠̜̮̤̠̣͓̰͎̯̹̱̻̭̙̩͉̙̥̱̥̥͕̘̜̰̺͔͇̖̩̇́̿̐̎̇͆̀͗̅͐̽̑͂̍͌̋́̓̉̂̆͗̿̽̊̍́̏̓̃̈́̅͊̌̇͊̈͒̔̈́́̔̈́̈̐̃̈͋͛͐͛̾̐̈́̋̓̾́̔̋̒͊͌̃͋̎̎̔̋̒̀̌̓̃̄͂̈́͋̎̅̓̍̄̉̅̍̌̄͆̂̏̆̈́̈̀̀̄̀̽͛̈́͒̍̆͒̏̓̏̂̈́̒̓́̑̒̾̉͗͗̈́͐̅̈́͒͊̽̀͌̈́͗̉̑͛̀̂͐́͑̆͒̔̌͆̈́̈́̊̈̎͋̽̅͆̃̑̔̋̃̋̈́͊̈͌́͑̆̆̅̈́̃̓̏͋̎͊̓̑̇̕̚͘͘͘̕͘̕̕͘̕̕͘̚͘͝͠͠͠͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝͝ͅ
@@zsoltkovacs827 HESH-eater
They actually might, future designs might take advantage of generative design
in 3d printers
@@5000mahmud comment ruiner alert
Spookston: *actually kills Tanks in Warfare 2077*
Me: *_"Is it possible to learn this Power?"_*
Flank and spank is what you had to do. Literally can't frontally fight the minatour unless you knew where to shoot, which was the treads. Had to have the right angle tho
Me with 15 kills:
Not from a jedi
Just spam the TV guided ATGMs lol
A tank with vertical launch ATGMs was designed in USSR in the late 1980x , also what he did not cover is drone tanks remote controlled
Basically the meta was to speedrun enough points for a Wyvern with AAM's and TV guided ATGM's, obtain air supremacy and then safely lob down ATGM's from 6km+ alt. Those fucking things were fat as hell and could get multikills super easy.
Oh right and if that wasn't enough yet, those things respawned in 25 seconds despite the gamemode being realistic lmao.
There was literally no counterplay for it if you couldn't spawn Wyverns of your own.
Apart from the camo technology the 2077 tanks aren't too far off from what we already got especially when compared to something like a T-14 Armata.
I feel like in the future an engineer will be asked to help design the next gen MBT and that engineer will have played War Thunder and will remember this event. Then they'll suggest to name the tank the Minotaur 😂
M2A1 Minotaur
“Despite some out wires like T-14”
That’s not correct. T-14/15/16 - heavy platform for main battle tank or breakthrough vehicle, for everything except that (SPAA/AA/APC/IFV etc) you have standardized multi role platforms one for “wheeled” battalions (Bumerang) and one for “threaded” battalions (Kurganets).
So it is only proves your point
a variant of the Teledyne AGS addressed the commander in the hull using a 360-degree video system for command and surveillance. this was slaved to the thermal sight.
I'm very interested to know more about this "Atiabacic" (spelling for sure) engine. I've never heard of it before.
Please do a video on adiabatic engines ❤ I'd love to know what they're like!
adiabatic is kind of the wrong term for these kind of engines. They just try to reduce cooling by using very heat resistant materials in the surfaces of the engine. you can save some Energy that would be dissapated in heat. So you can use some of that heat in a turbocharger to increase the efficiency a little bit. The main benefit of these type of engines are that you dont have to protect a cooling device and save some room in a tank. But the efficieny wont increase that much with this type of engine. It will more likely decrease. And the wear of the Engine would be horrible.
The Hybrid approach is more likely to happen. But it isnt unlikely that the rise of energy density in accumulators lead to full electric tanks.
imagine if someone brought a Renault FT17 in a modern War Thunder match
this tech already exist in the cv90120-t ghost a protoype light tank dosent work like in game but it hides your heat signature
Just wanted to say that Spook's video per few days schedule is very enjoyable because the videos are super high quality
Aspiring writer here. I prefer practicality over aesthetic. And who knows, perhaps a good practical design might provide a good aesthetic.
Not gonna lie wish you made longer more in-depth videos cause I just practically have a heart attack over when you release new vids. But I understand where your nitch is.
About the crew layout. My criticism about Armata is that the entire tank crew rely only to camera system to operate tank because the "crew capsule" layout and really lack of traditional sight/periscope systems as backup. Making no way for the crews to look up into battlefield in case the camera broken. With current layout on most tank, the traditional periscope system is pretty durable, so it can be backup to additional camera system. And the crew can easily open the hatch in case the periscope broken.
Spookston, as a fan of your war thunder videos I don’t normally like or comment rather just watch but I’m giving you my sport because I really like your redesign, everything wrong with, explanations, etc. I really enjoyed it until it was discontinued and I liked this video, surprised me, but I like it!
tbh i would love a long video on futuristic tank weapons
Where can I find more info on these coolant-free Diesel engines? It sounds pretty interesting.
Adiabatic engines. Google has some info
It says fuel consumption numbers "indicated" 48% thermal efficiency. Meanwhile opposed piston diesel engines achieve 55% thermal efficiency. This adiabatic engine thing seems to be a dead end as it doesn't work together with fuel injection, which is what every engine now has and would be a huge sacrifice. It's basically just taking an old diesel engine and making the components out of ceramics to limit heat loss.
Actually, i think that next generation tanks will be drone tanks with batteries of optics and radar features, commanded by nerd guys in the base, as actual aviation for cas and ground support. It would keep crew lives out of the way and stil be cost effective as the encryption and com wars are the next gen fighting. With very less foot soldiers on the battlefield but very protected and commanding a group of ground war machines pretty much as a spotter for the machines targetting and fire order.
Such an idea kinda already exists at least on paper, basically you would have a commander tank with a bunch of nearly indistingishable drone tanks following you with the commander tank taking control of them, a similar idea has been presented for air battles with the loyal wingman program that plans to create small drones that would be controlled by a bigger manned plane like an f-35 with a small army of cheap repleaceable drones
The missiles were OP because you could launch one, lock and then immediately launch another one, lock and repeat until the target is hit by 5+ missiles. It gets even worse if you're in the cap circle, because now you have unlimited missiles and unlimited smoke. I went 18-0 in my minotaur without even using the main gun because I sat in the cap circle with unlimited smoke and missiles.
My guess is that future tanks (like futuristic future) will be using some form of rail gun, and hybrid electric drive systems, essentially one giant electric generator to power the main weapon and propulsion systems.
Rail gun with the same kinetic energy as todays tank guns is completely impossible to put in a tank chassis. The inside of the tank would be a furnace after the first shot as all of the waste heat is stored inside the tank.
If you used a hybrid engine and had batteries onboard, you could activate optical camouflage, switch to battery power, and operate in a urban environment with a great deal of stealth. It would obviously be more useful on a light tank, ACV, or urban assault vehicle than a MBT.
The crafting system implies that the Minotaut uses electric motors to drive the tracks with batteries and a fuel cell to power the motors. What do you think of that?
Opposed piston diesel engines boast amazing efficiency and reduced complexity with greater power than standard piston engines with cylinder heads.
A diesel engine that doesn't require cooling seems like something out of a book where the author doesn't know physics.
I'd love to see a video on composite overwrap barrels and adiabatic engines! Never heard of either before
What about "Everything Wrong with Red Alert 3 tanks"?
Hey Spookston, I know you don't like making longer videos, but honestly I would love to hear you talk more about these topics and go into deeper detail on them. It kind of feels like you glossed over a lot of things here, to be honest.
Thanks for the advice, I'm gonna go design my own vison for a futuristic tank now
I miss videos like this from him...
When I saw a gameplay of this event, I knew youre going to make a video about it :D
How would the cloaking technology work? Do they use cameras to show the environment of one side of the tank and then broadcast the video on the opposite side? (Like the right side of the cloaking displays the left side of the environment, giving the illusion that it's see through.) I don't think cameras would be cost-effective though. :P
What are your thoughts?
the display would need to display an image that would be make sense for the angle the viewer is looking at. So it's appearance needs to be unique for every person that looks at it.
@@PanzerFaustFurious like in "Ghost Protocol"?
@PanzerFaustFurious Meh, you might be able to tailor it depending on the direction of a known or likely threat. Also, even a reasonable facsimile of the background would do wonders.
I subscribed because of those videos And I am happy you make a final look at those technologies
you are my go to asmr youtuber tysm man
future tank designers will try to combine IFVs and MBTs while keeping it at cheapest price as possible
I started playing war thunder because of your videos and I'm really liking it so far
i miss the 2077 event i wanna play it again
Unmanned turrets clearly
The Armata is already trying it and we’ve had “unmanned” turrets on aircraft since the interwar period
unmanned turrets have situational awareness issues that have yet to be solved, and if we ever solve them we will likely be useing drone tanks by then, hell unlike unmanned turrets drone tanks have already been used in combat. if you are going to loose the situational awareness and reliability (for lack of a better way of describing how a crewman can check a failed autoloader/etc) you might as well put the crew in a separate vehicle and save internal volume and thus weight and size and thus cost (amongst other things)
@@matthiuskoenig3378 Not really; look at the Stryker 105. Not only is still possible to have the same situational awareness as a vehicle with a manned turret, but as the effective range of modern MBT guns is 2km plus, with modern optical systems you can have much better battlefield awareness. Your commander can’t spot a tank in cover 2km away with the naked eye, and seeing things in the immediate vicinity should be something the driver and rest of the crew should already be capable of. The BMPT terminator is a perfect example of how you can still have the same or better situational awareness and still have an uninhabited turret. Given that like the T-14 it’s produced in Russia, even without actually seeing the specs for the Armata we can imagine it has similar capabilities. Unmanned turrets didn’t make sense 20 or 30 years ago because the tech wasn’t there to give the same level of awareness that a human being could give, we’ve come a very long way since then.
As far as “drone tanks” go, they’ll never become popular or replace manned vehicles. The sole reason is cyber warfare. Drone tanks like any remotely operated or independent machine can be hijacked and that’s a massive liability. The other thing is ping; machines can’t make decisions fast enough to compete with human crews (or accurately enough if they do manage that speed) and remotely operated vehicles have lag time between commands and action, such issues make them significantly inferior in combat to manned vehicles.
i dont thing the HARD kill aps system will Stop a APFSDS completly in the future like in this event
but Reduce the Penetration
Hey spookston...Ive been watching your vids for nearly a year now....I have one question...which tank/plane would you choose to have in (WT) if that was the only thing you could play and nothing else forever...???
Yeah but you forgot there is Autoloaders that are in the turret and they could have blow out panels.
Its because that if the hull was hit on the ammo it will go to the crew and kill them.
I still watch the "future tank" series from time to time.
Your first point ont he video saying that having the same chassis would be dubious is kinda wrong, you have to understand that for this event, War Thunder mainly (if not entirely) based themselfes on the MGCS or Main Ground Combat System, a future french-german system which will include a MBT, an ATGM launcher and a command vehicle/IFV based on the same chassis.
The camo tiles are also being experimented by Nexter, another french company that is working on the MGCS.
As for the fun fact, the drone in the event was an hybrid between the french nEUROn drone and the russian stealth drone, the cruise missiles were french SCALP-EG, and the air-air missiles were french MICA-NG.
SO you basically played with the french future equipment.
The T-14 Armata is only the latest in a long series of projects, from multiple nations, to develop a common chassis for heavy ground combat vehicles. From the Russian side, there was Object 299 that explored this concept, and to some extent, Object 195, while from the American side, there were the Armored Systems Modernization and the Future Combat Systems Manned Ground Vehicles programs that sought to do the same.
If I were to guess the vehicles are electrically driven motors. Based off the crafting event, the first thing in the middle row has an uncanny similarity to the battery pack sleds being used in modern electric vehicles.
Great video as always. I know you mentioned that this video would essentially serve as a conclusion to your "Future Tank Weaponry" series, but what are your thoughts of perhaps making a video in the future where you discuss the practicality and feasibility of using "force-fields" in future tanks and other AFVs? I do think it's an interesting concept, that you could make an equally interesting video about.
miniturized nuclear reactors could help power a dense plasma screen acting sorta like a non-newtonian liquid
Eventually they will be built around signal killing like stealth vehicles as sensors advance. Til t hen, mostly like now I'd say.
We all know that with the nuclear winter of 2078 tanks will use R-wave guns (R for rainbow)
Love your outro.
Imagine: automated/ remote controlled vehicles do not need to be protective as they carry no crew, and can be easily amassed as corps of highly mobile, compact, and concealable gun carriages, but also cheap to mass produce and replace. No crew lost is expected, and experienced crew are always preserved no matter the action.
Spookston go for Tank Encyclopedia Voice Articles. Your voice fits perfectly in this kind of materials.
I still think that the tanks should have reactive armor and hollow spaces to counter HEAT rounds and other nonkenetic munitions.
tanks will focus more on mobility and less on tankiness, actually I'm not sure if there's going to be a reason to use tanks at all, considering the armor actually makes most tanks worse in modern settings, might as well make cheap drones with a gun
Ik you dont usually play air but You should do future aircraft and Fiuture naval equipment
I think the engine is likely to be a hybrid elrctric system with a multifuel turbine running intermittently .
Turbine engines have incredibly high fuel consumption.
@@imnotusingmyrealname4566 no, they have a very highbfuel consumption at idle. If they are running intermittently at high load, their fuel consumption is average.
@@scottmcdivitt2187 Ok.
Hybrid abrams the true whispering death
Can you make a video on USA's next MBT?
there is sooo many anti tank weopons too the point where tanks are more of a rush then reward
holy shit hes rapping
When I first saw that invisibility feature I thought my game had a bug
Aaaand now you made me want to play Tiberian Dawn or Starcraft. Damn it, I am in Morrowind phase right now.
Please do a video on tanks in anime such as the Type 61 MBT from Gundam and the Edelweiss from Valkryia Chronicles.
The year is 2142. The EU and PAC are fighting over the last stretches of hospitable lands. The EU introduces a new version of the A-8 Tiger. The A-8C "'Black knight" features a new 150mm mass driver weapon, dual Active protective systems, a Railgun/minigun top turret for ATGM interception and most of all......a boiler vessel, now standard on any EU vehicle ranging from the Tiger to the Riesig walker to even the aircraft like the Talons
railguns would suck as a minigun concept
@@matthiuskoenig3378 i actually ment a railgun with a minigun next to it...and just joking ofcourse
Omg i wasn’t late for this video. Only 3 mins. But yes, thanks for the videos as ever
Ur 14 mins late...
what is that camo-incisibility thing even supposed to accomplish when so much of the tank is left exposed?
So this is like the "Everything wrong with" series you did a long time ago.
I dont think we will put crew in tank in the future tho, i think its just gonna remote controlled
Warfare 2077 is really fun. I wish it would stick around. You don’t have to bitch and moan about balance and crap, just pick your favorite vehicle, then run around and have fun
2077 was just a future top tier that was as balanced as it could possibly be. Even still, the Wyvern broke the modem
TH-cam: What will future tanks look like?
me: *Tanks :P*
when will spookston do Toon Thunder vid?
To extrapolate, one thing is for sure, the tank model from these past 70years is becoming obsolete like battleships before them (because atgm) so tanks will need a serious overhaul (doctrine + material-wise). Hell, even the countries selling them cite as a factor "intimidation", this is quite bad imo if that's 1 of the main parts of your selling pitch.
(i hope it prefigures the rise of mechs and other gundam-ey gimmicks so hard)
People were making the same prediction about ATGMs making tanks obsolete through the entire Cold War, and they were wrong for very simple reasons: Tanks and tactics evolve to counter threats and tanks can't simply be replaced with "nothing". Tanks aren't going anywhere until something else comes along and does the same job better. Weapons never made a target obsolete.
I feel like the 2077 event was a testbed for APS along with other things
By future you mean off world
Either
A mervaka
B stryker
It all depends on star lift getting vehicles to and fro
no talks about the ucav? Or even the recon drone?
should do a video on how allied tankers have less brain activity than a potato battery
Everybody says the videos about Rank V vehicles shooting from their spawn to the enemy spawn were a bug. And nothing more. My main worry exactly this ''spawn rocket'' ATGM. It seems to be the main focus of the whole event as a test object. And the end of War Thunder for me. Because no point of War Thunder Ground forces If these things ever hit the life server. They make every normal tank obsolete at once. I struggle enough the explode above target ATGM systems already. They made me feel it was pointless to grind for my absolute top MBT line-ups in 5 tech tree and climbing up to rank VI with two others. Not to mention when the real top gun supersonic jets will hit the tank RB. Not a good direction at all. I wish we would be able to ban not in progress battles and certain maps only but night battles and we need a tank only no CAS game mode. I know it is against Gayjin's business strategy. So not gonna happen. But they would be able to do that and give people bonus enough to keep alive night battles and mixed battles for the ones who choose to play them. Easy solutions and coast nothing but never gonna happen.
I am just curious if like an future IFV or possibly an MBT might be using an electrical engine somewhat similar to a Tesla
No, because it would likely require GURPS Superscience batteries I'm afraid. Even Battletech (the posterchild of having some crazy advanced batteries that are realistic) doesn't have much of anything powered by batteries alone, they always have some sort of ICE (which, compared to ours, are insanely efficient), Fuel Cell (far better than our models), Fission, or Fusion engine instead.
@@TheTrueAdept I like your answer but there’s a problem with fission engines, radiation and if the thing get hit it goes boom
Some say that in the future all MBT will thing of the past.
can you make videos about tanks from command and conquer generals ZH? i love them
Well theres no tank in the game that can go invisible but I would like to see the challenger 2 2f have the effect that it can't be seen clearly in thermals
I would like to see a mbt/artillery why the will step up to 140/152mm guns so why dont make a vehicle which can fire shells like a selfprobelled howitzer and have armour and movment like a mbt
The warfare 2077 is leaving a bad feeling in me of incoming armata, and i really hate that feeling
Can someone please explain why the ATGM randomly blew up above the ground
how would a hybrid engine on a tank work? prius tank prius tank
I could see some really light armored vehicles eventually going to a pure electric drive system, with a major advantage to such vehicles being how quiet they can be, especially wheeled vehicles. This could be useful for wheeled IFVs and tank destroyers.
I would have enjoyed this event but the frame rate on consoles is not good when in the event
The events were pretty shitty this year. I don't AB in Air and I don't do tanks at all.
You can finally attack the D point.
Why did the missiles during the event sometimes explode mid air before hitting the tank?
Was that some kinda bug or am I missing something?
That was the APS, my good sir
Where is the Baneblade at?
I look forward to main battle tanks becoming smaller and the return of tankettes in popularity. Very light, affordable, nimble machines, easier to maintain and operate with a 1-2 person crew, just need sufficient armor and firepower to back them up. How mental would it be if a tank could navigate a narrow alley, forward an assault into a building, traverse any bridge, be air dropped.
Throw in some absurd fantasy reactive armor and [insert future fantasy weapon here] and have a field day.
Fun video
I knew you'll make this video