I swear, keeping track of what premium does what is becoming increasingly impossible in this game. Twitter: twitter.com/flamuchz Discord: discord.gg/Flamu Stream: www.twitch.tv/flamuu Insta: instagram.com/flamugram/
About your point with Missouri: I think it was the only ship not touched by the old radar normalization, because premium or something. But you are right they completely ignored the rework after a while.
flamu look at this: In terms of the first jet aircraft to take off from a US Navy aircraft carrier using JATO, it was a Lockheed P-2 Neptune, which launched from the aircraft carrier USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42) on July 2, 1951 The first jet aircraft to take off from a US Navy aircraft carrier using Jet Assisted Take Off (JATO) was a Lockheed P-2 Neptune. This event took place on the aircraft carrier USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42) on July 2, 1951. This marked a significant milestone in the history of aviation. LMAO
HMS Duke of York and HMS Hood are the only current BBs with USN cruiser pen angles. (Duke has the same caliber guns and Hood has larger guns) And they’re pretty balanced. So I don’t think the Rhode Islands pen angles will be as big of a deal as people might think.
As someone who started playing way back in the closed alpha nine years ago, I definitely agree on how much of a goddamn challenge it is to memorize every single relevant statistic for the ships in this game.
I really want the Vermont supership/side grade to be a gigantic barge, like a literal flat barge with like 18 457mm guns, bristling with AA, a tennis court, and can be spotted from everywhere but also has 30 km base range. Call it Pennsylvania
If you add brisk to Rhode Island,! She actually goes 44 knots, shes crazy fast. Really interested in that ship, seems really fun. Shes a total kit-bash of USN premium BB gimmicks and its super cool imo.
I saw these last light, and I was both happy & sad at the results, but also in shock. Seeing Independence was nice, the actual historical ship that WG release once a year. Tianjin is just sad, a copy-paste Riga that no one asked for. And for Rhode Island, she's just a total Metammoran Fusion Dance of the quad turrets from Florida, Alaska's Radar function, and possibly either an Iowa or Montana hull.
I have met a division of 2 michelangelos, sharing smoke raining on everything with secondaries, but their main guns placement, makes it look like biggest Italian abomination in game.
For real, Finland has fcking RIDICULOUSLY fast internet. One of, like 10 things I remember from visiting a few times. You don't want to know the other 9
@@stefanocrosazzo3262 maybe, maybe it won’t because of the armor. just remember mecklenburg is tankier than this one with more hp and more armor thickness. it’ll be more likely a Florida in tier 10 with speed boost, radar, better secondaries, fast cooldown repair party and better dispersion. Florida’s sigma rate is exactly the same with Rhode Island which is 1.7 and it has 204m standard dispersion. Turrets i think they are the same as well, like 3*4 356mm and shell damage output is same. So i’m not sure about it’ll worth to buy or not. It will fit as a coal ship but i wouldn’t spend my steel or research points on this ship.
@@sdmobiwan The biggest irony is RI has the reload Florida should have gotten out of the gate. 34 secs for 356mm no overmatch guns at tier 7 was already pretty ass. 25 secs at tier 10 is somewhat workable but honestly this might be a ship where you take Reload mod over Dispersion because something tells me these 14 inch guns are not going to have the best pen so your main damage output is going to have to come down to gun DPM per salvo and AP chunk damage.
@@sdmobiwan Mecklenburg tankiness is largely irrelevant when you have to show flat broadside in order to shoot all your guns, the thing has GK firing angles after all
I do enjoy your reactions to these devblogs - they are nearly always dented! Tianjin is fine - it has 500 more hp than Riga, so 50500 - that 1% is huge :P lol
The Tianjin was designed as the result of a watercooler talk between the devs, when someone complained that Riga is the worst cruiser in the game, and someone else was like "hold my beer".
Rhode island is pretty much a combination of the Florida and Georgia, with improved AP Ricochet angles, with radar like the missouri. Low surviving fast firing secondaries, (I'm feeling they might go West Virginia secondary reload speed given their low HP.) and to top it off, it gets an engine boost, because why not. (Edit) also in the Blog said that the Ship can Dodge torpedoes in close range engagements and use radar to spot ships close to you, yet says as well that prolonged engagements of any kind is not recommended especially against other BBs(some of which have torpedoes), so they say its good of Dodging torpedoes yet at the same time says its not recommended to get close anyways due to small HP pool and Armor? they make it up the go.
Jet-assisted takeoff (JATO) was historically developed by 1945. It was generally used on larger aircraft. It was actually a "JATO bottle" that acted as a short-duration rocket motor for takeoff boost only. However, during WWII the US military thought of rockets as crackpot, thus "jet" in this case, also the name of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory that developed larger rockets.
Speed boost , 9 km radar 12 guns in 3 turrents 356mm , 30s reload & 72k hp , i have Alaska I Have Puetor Rico ... this ship is a freak health + tier + gun set up I could compare to Illionis , and is bb , speed boost Georgia , to be honnest I dont fell great about that ship , they will change it 100% , I feel if they made Alaska reaload that ship would be atractive , but she will have worse US T10 BB guns , I have Montana , Vermont , Louisiana & Ohio and last one have 24s reload with 8 guns cal 456mm , so yeah Rhoade Island look bad when I look on stats I think they should made 305mm guns and 9s base reaload as Illionis have , that would made more sense.
@@smilingpolitely12345 idk where you got 30 second reload, its 25 second reload and her HP 74k. Also please dont tell me you take reload on Ohio or any other american BB tbh, her base reload is 27.5 seconds 9 second reload on 305s would have been absolutely fucking ridiculous and stupid, like I dont think you understand how much dpm that would be. If it had 305s it still would of had like a 22 second reload or smth. This thing is a high speed battlecruiser, if you’ve played Bourg, Vincent, Lauria, schlieffen, or anything of that like, shes a new flavor of that kind of ship. She goes 44knots with a proper build (brisk + flag + engine boost). She has secondaries, fast heals and accurate guns on top of the speed, shes going to want to be pushing a flank, likely hit and run style. The radar will likely be a late game tool, but is still a good tool to have, can help deal with DDs bc of your secs and good guns, but its not her main identity, again its just a tool she has. Shes a kit-bash of almost every American premium BB. Florida guns, Illiniois improved AP pen angle, ohio/georgia/massa heal secondary and engine boost specifically from Georgia, radar from Missouri and Constellation. Even has Georgia’s hull, at least in look, we dont know the full armor layout yet. Ship seems pretty good to me
@@jaywerner8415 This is about what their gun can do in their tier. 356 can overmatch cruiser in t7 but it can't in t10. The roles in their own tier are different.
I noticed something weird on the ship chart. When Flamu scrolled down and was focusing on the lower ships, I noticed that in the top slot was a ship named Sodermanland. No joke. does the chart have the names of test ships that WG hasn't disclosed about yet?
imagine if we would get all the funny Project [insert number] names for Soviet ships (e.g. Kirov as Project 26, Chapayev as Project 68 and Kronshtadt as Project 69)
Rhode Island, Take USS Florida and bump it up to tier 10 and give it Radar. Sounds like a FUN TIME! Plus Better Pen Angles on the AP is always welcome.
Me in my Rhode Island.....they see me rolling, they hate´n. As i fly by your daring. Or move bitxh get out the way get out the way bitxh get out the way. 40kts moving that much tonnage is crazy.
I played a match tonight and saw how quick the Serov carrier was And i thought Wargaming finally realized that CV’s absolutely ruins the matches they are in
I'm not defending them doing stupid buffs to carriers compared to other classes. I don't think they should have jets, or JATO, or half the bs WG gives them. But, JATO (jet assisted take off), does not necessarily mean a jet engine. It means rockets strapped to planes, to take off in a shorter distance, as the name implies. And this existed before 1943. So it is technically plausible, and the armchair historian/historical accuracy people don't know what they're talking about.
The only use of RATO/JATO in a WW2 maritime setting was to launch Hurricanes off of tiny ramps on merchant ships. This happened only 9 times and the plane had to either find an airfield ashore or be abandoned. It would never be used for carrier based prop planes. It's fantasy.
@@ordavis There are many pictures of it being used on US carrier based planes from WWII. Wildcats, Corsairs, Avengers, etc. It is not fantasy whatsoever.
Does it really go back that far? I'm surprised their is no Camera Footage or photos of it being used. Or at the very least no one ever talks about it. Reguardless it does sound kinda far fetched when ya think about it.
Haven't played Wows in a long time, therefore most of the ships at the start feels so alien to me. Can I ask: Are those US Cvs techline or premium ships? Because their color are white so I assume they are tech tree, and if so Weegee is nut
@@LJKGray support class CVs has their own gimmick. There will be IJN ones as well but not sure when or how RN, KMS or soviet support class will be released. US line of support class have opportunity to lay a mine field on the surface. IJN support class will have opportunity of dropping smokes to surface as you mentioned.
@@LJKGray Their Planes have Gimmick consumables, A Smoke Curtain in this case. (WG WHERE ARE THE F@#$ING MINES?! WE WANT MINES TO TROLL SUBS DAMIT!) And ya know, replace the normal Squadrons with Tactical squadrons cus Tactical Squadrons are JUST BETTER.
WeeGee still adding all the paper ships in the world but we still haven’t even gotten USS Nevada or to a lesser extent USS New Jersey (NJ in her Nam config would be interesting at T10)
@@oldRighty1 pretty sure the 90mm italian are shit, i think they’re sap so they don’t start fires and they can’t pen anything, so not much of a nerf really
Didn't tier 10 carriers once have jet aircraft as the upgrade aircrafts then they removed them some time ago? Even though the decks of the carriers are nowhere near long enough for a jet aircraft to safely land on them.
USS Midway supposedly had some, But i joined the game well after that was a thing so can't confirm. Although those "JETS" might have also been the planes that the US Super CV has where they are Turbo Props with Jet Turbines. I THINK Early jets (sub sonic ones) could take of old carriers like that (to a point) They did get Plane Catapults at some point so thats probably how. As I said i have no idea, would have look up OLD videos of WOWS.
Do you really want an answer to that? Ya see, these DC charges are basicly OIL drums full of TNT, the idea being the Explosion will Crack open the Subs Pressurized Hull. (thus ether Sinking it or forcing it to surface) Ships don't need to worry about pressure, and Water does not Compress thus absorbing the Explosion as well as distributing it over distence. (The shockwave will not brake the hull) Also You are not gonna blow a hole in a ships hull less the charge is right next to the hull, like a Torpedo Does. Not to mention the Armor on these ships is at lest 1 inch thick of steel if not more.
It is not comparable with georgia. It is straight a florida with georgia’s fast reloading heal, speed boost and secondary gimmicks plus survelliance radar. It is completely a new playing experience because of the radar.
DovBleg says "Jet assisted start" (the fast boost at the beginn like on Nakimov , Ise , Tone [list goes on]). Flamu sees "jet" "OH GOD THE T6 GETS JETS!" flamuFish ? Well... I dislike CVs too... But just sayin false stuff is =/
Its true, I have been in this shit from Beta and I cant be 100% sure for some ships longer, its like - wait thats an aisan DD.. does it have deep torps or not..lets find out *dies*.
shit i havent even been playing as long as most people and using mods to help know all the assets various ships have is a damn godsend in this game. For like a week it took my dumbass dying to Spanish cruiser torps 4 times to realize most of them have torps from T7 and up
Kinda looks like WG is trying to remind everyone they tried to make world of warplanes and it sucked, now we are playing world of warplanes 2, world of warship edition
They are not "JETS". They are normal Prop Planes which WG strapped Take Off Rocket boosters to. Im fairly certain this was not a thing that was EVER DONE.
We console players have the Independence as a premium ship but no rocket planes and JATOs on her. We only have JATOs on our higher tier Russian carriers but still we don't have rocket planes on any of our carriers yet.
@@jaywerner8415 Precisely. A bomb is different from a shell. Sure, there are penetrating bombs (what WOWS would call AP bombs), but HE bombs are set to explode on contact.
@@OneDayOldif count every existed including sisterships of an class US BB in Wows We still don’t have Idaho (WW1 Dreadnought) Kentucky (planned BB-66) New Hampshire (planned BB-70) Oregon Utah (Testbed for Vermont Unique Upgrade) North Dakota Michigan Mississippi (WW1 Dreadnought) Connecticut (beta name of Vermont) Subs states like Hawaii Alaska Puerto Rico, Guam existed in American Large Cruisers
Of course balance is out of whack. None of the devs play the game, so none of them have a clue how bad they've made it. And now that they've eliminated any possibility of discussion about what they're doing wrong it's just going to get worse
😂😂😂 why the rage with carriers beeing able to use tactical squadron? There is no way any surface ship could run into enemies with gun unloaded why carriers should?
Because tactical squadrons are basically bonus planes you don't care about losing as they get another full squadron after a cool down anyway. Just means shooting them down doesn't matter at all so AA is even more useless.
When you don't develop the game itself in any meaningful sense, you have nothing new to offer other than more and more ludicrous, bullshit nonsense ships with seemingly random stats. It's EXACTLY what happened to WoT, and it was because I was certain it would happen to this game as well that I bailed after ~500 battles after release. That's after having played all the way from Alpha testing; so clear they were going to make this into as much of an arcade farce as they did tanks, such a gross shame for anyone with a genuine, deep knowledge of the real naval warfare history of this period.
Every time i see "Jet Assisted Takeoff" I cringe. For Christ sake Wargaming AT LEAST TRY! They may as well just add ACTUAL JET Turbo Props At this point, oh wait they DID, on the SUPER CARRIERS! Far as i know, Jet Assisted Takeoff was NEVER A THING for WW2 planes cus ya know THEY DIDN'T NEED IT! Also JTOW rockets had not been invented yet. In fact the only Jets in WW2 where the 2 German Ones and far as i know they just Took off like normal. May as well add F86 Sabers and M17s for all the good it would do.
Love how the chat is comparing internet speeds at the start of the video. Wish I could get fiber internet services. But the best we get in the back woods of Vermont is either DSL provided by a phone company which sucked ass. But the best available for speed is Starlink. Can play online games like World of Warships but every hour and a half it will have a delay while acquiring the lead sat of the chain of satellites. It's enough of a delay to cause the game to disconnect. But for downloading large files it works great. Fiber may not be in my area any sooner than 2025 and then I am a sceptic because the phone company doesn't maintain its shit as it is. Fiber is even more maintainace intensive than conventional metal cable. So, I doubt the lazy shits will actually do their job and provide a good quality service.
Yeah fastest i can get where i am is 20Mb/s (was only 2Mb/s for a long time). I get seriously triggered when people complain they have to wait a whole hour to download a 100 gb game or something when it takes me an entire day lol.
I swear, keeping track of what premium does what is becoming increasingly impossible in this game.
Twitter: twitter.com/flamuchz
Discord: discord.gg/Flamu
Stream: www.twitch.tv/flamuu
Insta: instagram.com/flamugram/
Wargaming spamming premiums is nothing new, but it's always a face-palm moment.
About your point with Missouri: I think it was the only ship not touched by the old radar normalization, because premium or something. But you are right they completely ignored the rework after a while.
flamu look at this:
In terms of the first jet aircraft to take off from a US Navy aircraft carrier using JATO, it was a Lockheed P-2 Neptune, which launched from the aircraft carrier USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42) on July 2, 1951
The first jet aircraft to take off from a US Navy aircraft carrier using Jet Assisted Take Off (JATO) was a Lockheed P-2 Neptune. This event took place on the aircraft carrier USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42) on July 2, 1951. This marked a significant milestone in the history of aviation.
LMAO
HMS Duke of York and HMS Hood are the only current BBs with USN cruiser pen angles. (Duke has the same caliber guns and Hood has larger guns) And they’re pretty balanced. So I don’t think the Rhode Islands pen angles will be as big of a deal as people might think.
Unless it gets better pen angles like the Italian bbs did on wows legends (55-70° pen angles instead of 55-65°)
Also Illinois but that thing has 203mm guns
Hood and York only get 5 degrees better....and considering the mediocre dispersion and pen values that 5 degrees often doesn't do much for you.
Duke of York sucks
Not US CA angles, they're much worse
As someone who started playing way back in the closed alpha nine years ago, I definitely agree on how much of a goddamn challenge it is to memorize every single relevant statistic for the ships in this game.
I really want the Vermont supership/side grade to be a gigantic barge, like a literal flat barge with like 18 457mm guns, bristling with AA, a tennis court, and can be spotted from everywhere but also has 30 km base range. Call it Pennsylvania
It should be the Tillman design with the funni sextuple turrets
it also dont have propulsion of her own and get tug by fleet of tugboats
@@able_archer01 oh hell yeah!!
If you add brisk to Rhode Island,! She actually goes 44 knots, shes crazy fast.
Really interested in that ship, seems really fun. Shes a total kit-bash of USN premium BB gimmicks and its super cool imo.
Its USS Florida (tier 7 premium) bumped up to tier 10. But i agree she sounds like fun.
Imagine playing Daring and Rhode Island start zooming toward you
yeah but prob wg will add her behind some weird loot box or event
@@CrissTRG they’re gonna give her either the Brisbane or Lauria treatment
@@CrissTRGWG stupid,greedy,no creativity and is a bastard to screw their game up 😂
I saw these last light, and I was both happy & sad at the results, but also in shock.
Seeing Independence was nice, the actual historical ship that WG release once a year.
Tianjin is just sad, a copy-paste Riga that no one asked for.
And for Rhode Island, she's just a total Metammoran Fusion Dance of the quad turrets from Florida, Alaska's Radar function, and possibly either an Iowa or Montana hull.
I have met a division of 2 michelangelos, sharing smoke raining on everything with secondaries, but their main guns placement, makes it look like biggest Italian abomination in game.
For real, Finland has fcking RIDICULOUSLY fast internet. One of, like 10 things I remember from visiting a few times. You don't want to know the other 9
Rhoade Island looks like a US Mecklenburg
Just like how Meck feels like playing 2 Agirs, Rhoade will feel like playing 2 Alaskas
Which means Rhode Island will be a better Mecklenburg, right? 🤔
@@stefanocrosazzo3262 maybe, maybe it won’t because of the armor. just remember mecklenburg is tankier than this one with more hp and more armor thickness. it’ll be more likely a Florida in tier 10 with speed boost, radar, better secondaries, fast cooldown repair party and better dispersion. Florida’s sigma rate is exactly the same with Rhode Island which is 1.7 and it has 204m standard dispersion. Turrets i think they are the same as well, like 3*4 356mm and shell damage output is same. So i’m not sure about it’ll worth to buy or not. It will fit as a coal ship but i wouldn’t spend my steel or research points on this ship.
@@sdmobiwan The biggest irony is RI has the reload Florida should have gotten out of the gate. 34 secs for 356mm no overmatch guns at tier 7 was already pretty ass. 25 secs at tier 10 is somewhat workable but honestly this might be a ship where you take Reload mod over Dispersion because something tells me these 14 inch guns are not going to have the best pen so your main damage output is going to have to come down to gun DPM per salvo and AP chunk damage.
@@sdmobiwan Mecklenburg tankiness is largely irrelevant when you have to show flat broadside in order to shoot all your guns, the thing has GK firing angles after all
Fast DCP is far worse than normal DCP for a cruiser.
I do enjoy your reactions to these devblogs - they are nearly always dented!
Tianjin is fine - it has 500 more hp than Riga, so 50500 - that 1% is huge :P lol
"...it pops out from behind an island going 40 knots, being helmed by Bob the Trader..."
Have we met?
The Tianjin was designed as the result of a watercooler talk between the devs, when someone complained that Riga is the worst cruiser in the game, and someone else was like "hold my beer".
Rhode island is pretty much a combination of the Florida and Georgia, with improved AP Ricochet angles, with radar like the missouri. Low surviving fast firing secondaries, (I'm feeling they might go West Virginia secondary reload speed given their low HP.) and to top it off, it gets an engine boost, because why not.
(Edit) also in the Blog said that the Ship can Dodge torpedoes in close range engagements and use radar to spot ships close to you, yet says as well that prolonged engagements of any kind is not recommended especially against other BBs(some of which have torpedoes), so they say its good of Dodging torpedoes yet at the same time says its not recommended to get close anyways due to small HP pool and Armor?
they make it up the go.
Excellent point! That and their trying to say she has grate maneuverability but shit armor.
Bring the Whyoming with atlanta guns
Jet-assisted takeoff (JATO) was historically developed by 1945. It was generally used on larger aircraft. It was actually a "JATO bottle" that acted as a short-duration rocket motor for takeoff boost only. However, during WWII the US military thought of rockets as crackpot, thus "jet" in this case, also the name of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory that developed larger rockets.
As an old DD main, I have to keep watching these to remind myself I dont want to come back.
The rhode island is more like a t10 alaska than puerto rico does
Speed boost , 9 km radar 12 guns in 3 turrents 356mm , 30s reload & 72k hp , i have Alaska I Have Puetor Rico ... this ship is a freak health + tier + gun set up I could compare to Illionis , and is bb , speed boost Georgia , to be honnest I dont fell great about that ship , they will change it 100% , I feel if they made Alaska reaload that ship would be atractive , but she will have worse US T10 BB guns , I have Montana , Vermont , Louisiana & Ohio and last one have 24s reload with 8 guns cal 456mm , so yeah Rhoade Island look bad when I look on stats I think they should made 305mm guns and 9s base reaload as Illionis have , that would made more sense.
@@smilingpolitely12345 idk where you got 30 second reload, its 25 second reload and her HP 74k.
Also please dont tell me you take reload on Ohio or any other american BB tbh, her base reload is 27.5 seconds
9 second reload on 305s would have been absolutely fucking ridiculous and stupid, like I dont think you understand how much dpm that would be. If it had 305s it still would of had like a 22 second reload or smth.
This thing is a high speed battlecruiser, if you’ve played Bourg, Vincent, Lauria, schlieffen, or anything of that like, shes a new flavor of that kind of ship.
She goes 44knots with a proper build (brisk + flag + engine boost). She has secondaries, fast heals and accurate guns on top of the speed, shes going to want to be pushing a flank, likely hit and run style. The radar will likely be a late game tool, but is still a good tool to have, can help deal with DDs bc of your secs and good guns, but its not her main identity, again its just a tool she has.
Shes a kit-bash of almost every American premium BB. Florida guns, Illiniois improved AP pen angle, ohio/georgia/massa heal secondary and engine boost specifically from Georgia, radar from Missouri and Constellation. Even has Georgia’s hull, at least in look, we dont know the full armor layout yet.
Ship seems pretty good to me
Tier 10 USS Florida actually.
@@jaywerner8415 This is about what their gun can do in their tier. 356 can overmatch cruiser in t7 but it can't in t10. The roles in their own tier are different.
@@flyingturtle4132 Fair enough. She would be classed as a Battle Cruiser by that Era's standards anyway.
its not actually "jet" assisted takeoff but Rocket assisted, jet assisted was Not a thing!
Correct.
There are no CV mains, just people who's hearts fill with hate after RNG screws with them enough.
With this logic I think I know who that the hearts full of (CV) hate 🤭
I noticed something weird on the ship chart. When Flamu scrolled down and was focusing on the lower ships, I noticed that in the top slot was a ship named Sodermanland. No joke. does the chart have the names of test ships that WG hasn't disclosed about yet?
I believe that was a clone of Halland(?) for leg mod testing
@@Hahlen Yup.
Tianjin also does not seem to get Riga's improved pen angles. What is the point of this ship??
To Troll you and Rip you off.
At least in WoWS ships have names if you want to learn what a ship can do. In WoT it is just "Object NumberX" :D
imagine if we would get all the funny Project [insert number] names for Soviet ships (e.g. Kirov as Project 26, Chapayev as Project 68 and Kronshtadt as Project 69)
Rhode Island, Take USS Florida and bump it up to tier 10 and give it Radar. Sounds like a FUN TIME! Plus Better Pen Angles on the AP is always welcome.
What we dont see it the copy pasta ships in the end stats, right?
Me in my Rhode Island.....they see me rolling, they hate´n. As i fly by your daring.
Or move bitxh get out the way get out the way bitxh get out the way.
40kts moving that much tonnage is crazy.
Ludicrus Speed!
I played a match tonight and saw how quick the Serov carrier was
And i thought Wargaming finally realized that CV’s absolutely ruins the matches they are in
I'm not defending them doing stupid buffs to carriers compared to other classes. I don't think they should have jets, or JATO, or half the bs WG gives them. But, JATO (jet assisted take off), does not necessarily mean a jet engine. It means rockets strapped to planes, to take off in a shorter distance, as the name implies. And this existed before 1943. So it is technically plausible, and the armchair historian/historical accuracy people don't know what they're talking about.
I am certain half of them never really paid attention to details or get all of their information from Wikipedia.
The only use of RATO/JATO in a WW2 maritime setting was to launch Hurricanes off of tiny ramps on merchant ships. This happened only 9 times and the plane had to either find an airfield ashore or be abandoned. It would never be used for carrier based prop planes. It's fantasy.
@@ordavis Yeah. That makes sense. I think they are just doing it for gimmick purposes at this point.
@@ordavis There are many pictures of it being used on US carrier based planes from WWII. Wildcats, Corsairs, Avengers, etc. It is not fantasy whatsoever.
Does it really go back that far? I'm surprised their is no Camera Footage or photos of it being used. Or at the very least no one ever talks about it. Reguardless it does sound kinda far fetched when ya think about it.
Rhode island is basically a slightly tankier Florida...3 tiers higher, I don't really see any point in this, suspecting buffs.
Can you imagine, if AA guns had a reload time at the beginning of the game, or after each time you use reinforced sector?
Haven't played Wows in a long time, therefore most of the ships at the start feels so alien to me. Can I ask: Are those US Cvs techline or premium ships? Because their color are white so I assume they are tech tree, and if so Weegee is nut
WeeGee is infact planning TT lines of "support" carrier types... so yeah, WeeGee having a nut once again.
Tech tree, they’re the first of the “support” CVs
Essex is the tier 10, Yorktown is tier 8, and Independence is the tier 6
@@BigD321 I thought back then they tried to add smoke deploy plane, stun bombs... sh1t like that. Don't know they are just pure dmg farmers yet again
@@LJKGray support class CVs has their own gimmick. There will be IJN ones as well but not sure when or how RN, KMS or soviet support class will be released. US line of support class have opportunity to lay a mine field on the surface. IJN support class will have opportunity of dropping smokes to surface as you mentioned.
@@LJKGray Their Planes have Gimmick consumables, A Smoke Curtain in this case. (WG WHERE ARE THE F@#$ING MINES?! WE WANT MINES TO TROLL SUBS DAMIT!) And ya know, replace the normal Squadrons with Tactical squadrons cus Tactical Squadrons are JUST BETTER.
Bro don't complain about Rhode Island having an engine boost. That's the only thing that's gonna allow us to run away from the subs lol :D
U 4501 "Are you sure about that?"
WeeGee still adding all the paper ships in the world but we still haven’t even gotten USS Nevada or to a lesser extent USS New Jersey (NJ in her Nam config would be interesting at T10)
RHODE ISLAND MENTIONED
The michelangelo doesn’t get a 10% dpm nerf though, only the 90 mm get a reload nerf, the other secondaries don’t, so it’s less than 10%
What good are the 90mm though? Pen DDs, or start fires?
@@oldRighty1 pretty sure the 90mm italian are shit, i think they’re sap so they don’t start fires and they can’t pen anything, so not much of a nerf really
"Who has radar?" EVERYONE has radar!!!!
(Zao cries in corner)
Tianjin needs to be like lower tier UU Petro to work with that setup. Idk what what it's supposed to do
Didn't tier 10 carriers once have jet aircraft as the upgrade aircrafts then they removed them some time ago? Even though the decks of the carriers are nowhere near long enough for a jet aircraft to safely land on them.
USS Midway supposedly had some, But i joined the game well after that was a thing so can't confirm. Although those "JETS" might have also been the planes that the US Super CV has where they are Turbo Props with Jet Turbines. I THINK Early jets (sub sonic ones) could take of old carriers like that (to a point) They did get Plane Catapults at some point so thats probably how.
As I said i have no idea, would have look up OLD videos of WOWS.
I think in the ancient times Midway had Banshee and it was removed for being too unrealistic
Rhode island, US Mecklenburg?
Hot take here, Independence is a Premium CV on WoWs Legends and is pretty nasty too
4:00 even submarine radar starts in a massive cooldown, like 4-5 minutes? CVs are the worst.
Poor Independence man, I'll take one for the team and definitely not seal club in that thing.
Why do depth charges not kill all surface ships not just surfaced subs
Do you really want an answer to that? Ya see, these DC charges are basicly OIL drums full of TNT, the idea being the Explosion will Crack open the Subs Pressurized Hull. (thus ether Sinking it or forcing it to surface) Ships don't need to worry about pressure, and Water does not Compress thus absorbing the Explosion as well as distributing it over distence. (The shockwave will not brake the hull) Also You are not gonna blow a hole in a ships hull less the charge is right next to the hull, like a Torpedo Does.
Not to mention the Armor on these ships is at lest 1 inch thick of steel if not more.
Imagine playing Agincourt against independence....
Quite litteraly "What is AA?"
CV aircraft should have some sort of fuel system... More payload, less range etc....
Rhode Island is just a Georgia with less armor and Florida guns but with more gimmicks all around the ship
It is not comparable with georgia. It is straight a florida with georgia’s fast reloading heal, speed boost and secondary gimmicks plus survelliance radar. It is completely a new playing experience because of the radar.
@@sdmobiwan meant to say Georgia hull
the jet assist is for takeoff only they don't retain the jets for the attack.
Following the trend, soon we will have a Soviet BB with 30 Smolensk guns.
DovBleg says "Jet assisted start" (the fast boost at the beginn like on Nakimov , Ise , Tone [list goes on]). Flamu sees "jet" "OH GOD THE T6 GETS JETS!" flamuFish ? Well... I dislike CVs too... But just sayin false stuff is =/
the furieus taco and the aiba have 48 mm dek armor, i think they are not afraid of this tier 6 flying c@ncer
SomeHOW Wargaming hire the worst people on the planet to operate the game. I swear WG actions now a days is making Blizzard looks like an angel
25sec reload on US (battle)cruiser with 356mm guns but a WHOLE 15seconds on an ijn 150mm... yea.. makes sense
where do you find these devblogs?
Its true, I have been in this shit from Beta and I cant be 100% sure for some ships longer, its like - wait thats an aisan DD.. does it have deep torps or not..lets find out *dies*.
Bob the trader
Can he do it?
Bob the trader
Yes he can!!!
Doesn't seem like review bombing on steam is doing anything
That would require WG's staff to actually have braincells and a moral compass, they have neither.
why do they keep using these French style quads on USN ships?
Oh boy imagine super brick with 8.5 km radar
shit i havent even been playing as long as most people and using mods to help know all the assets various ships have is a damn godsend in this game. For like a week it took my dumbass dying to Spanish cruiser torps 4 times to realize most of them have torps from T7 and up
Kinda looks like WG is trying to remind everyone they tried to make world of warplanes and it sucked, now we are playing world of warplanes 2, world of warship edition
Funny enough that game is still RUNNING and their is like what 100 people playing it.
Jet planes are the new 457mm guns.
Once again weegee proves they have no idea how ww2 ships work with physics, there's no way a jet could land on one of those escort cv's
They are not "JETS". They are normal Prop Planes which WG strapped Take Off Rocket boosters to. Im fairly certain this was not a thing that was EVER DONE.
lol, relatively low penetration, as compared to shikishima ap
We console players have the Independence as a premium ship but no rocket planes and JATOs on her. We only have JATOs on our higher tier Russian carriers but still we don't have rocket planes on any of our carriers yet.
Think on the bright side they have not get the F35-B on CVs yet
Isn't that plane from like the 60s?
@@jaywerner8415 no the F35 Lighting II stealth fighter is the "jet fighter", I talk about XD
Big buff big buff
....I don't think HE bombs shatter IRL (I know, its an arcade game, I'm just tacking onto what you were saying earlier about the jets etc.)
Yeah....wouldn't they just Detonate on the Deck and burn the paint? At worst set the deck on fire.
@@jaywerner8415 Precisely. A bomb is different from a shell. Sure, there are penetrating bombs (what WOWS would call AP bombs), but HE bombs are set to explode on contact.
Nothing can be better than a Russian ship! Nothing to see here no Russian bias.
fix aiming bugs ? naaah more secondary ships !
356mm guns at tier ten wtf?
Mecklenburg says hi
Riga from wish and bourg from wish
smallest state = small guns i guess
thank u Flamu remind me to stay off WG's bullshit again🤣
hype, nerf repeat.
Next we gonna have USS Kentucky/Idaho with Alaska/PR's 305mm Quadruple Gun with Mark 35 Torpedoes Tubes. Welcome to World of Warships
@@OneDayOldif count every existed including sisterships of an class US BB in Wows
We still don’t have
Idaho (WW1 Dreadnought)
Kentucky (planned BB-66)
New Hampshire (planned BB-70)
Oregon
Utah (Testbed for Vermont Unique Upgrade)
North Dakota
Michigan
Mississippi (WW1 Dreadnought)
Connecticut (beta name of Vermont)
Subs states like Hawaii Alaska Puerto Rico, Guam existed in American Large Cruisers
So... I'm a CV main, and even I think the Essex branch is bullshit.
outperforming schlieffen dpm wtf....
Of course balance is out of whack. None of the devs play the game, so none of them have a clue how bad they've made it. And now that they've eliminated any possibility of discussion about what they're doing wrong it's just going to get worse
I want Kamikaze planes in wows
We all secretly do. But we know better then to ask, their is few things more terrifying then a pissed off Japanese man with a Katanna.
SO instead of putting Washington in the game, they put this hot garbage?
lol independence is back
😂😂😂 why the rage with carriers beeing able to use tactical squadron? There is no way any surface ship could run into enemies with gun unloaded why carriers should?
Because tactical squadrons are basically bonus planes you don't care about losing as they get another full squadron after a cool down anyway. Just means shooting them down doesn't matter at all so AA is even more useless.
US BB t11 will get 8.5km Radar. Only logical. Lose 0.5km per Tier
Wargaming releseing a patch note? Why even put words in there. Just put a mocking smiling face, thats the honest thing to do at this point 😂
When you don't develop the game itself in any meaningful sense, you have nothing new to offer other than more and more ludicrous, bullshit nonsense ships with seemingly random stats.
It's EXACTLY what happened to WoT, and it was because I was certain it would happen to this game as well that I bailed after ~500 battles after release.
That's after having played all the way from Alpha testing; so clear they were going to make this into as much of an arcade farce as they did tanks, such a gross shame for anyone with a genuine, deep knowledge of the real naval warfare history of this period.
Every time i see "Jet Assisted Takeoff" I cringe. For Christ sake Wargaming AT LEAST TRY! They may as well just add ACTUAL JET Turbo Props At this point, oh wait they DID, on the SUPER CARRIERS! Far as i know, Jet Assisted Takeoff was NEVER A THING for WW2 planes cus ya know THEY DIDN'T NEED IT! Also JTOW rockets had not been invented yet. In fact the only Jets in WW2 where the 2 German Ones and far as i know they just Took off like normal.
May as well add F86 Sabers and M17s for all the good it would do.
Wargaming just copy pasting ship and then they call it premium or so,BE CREATIVE GOD DAMN IT WARGAMING
things like these make me not want to come back to the game
FFS.. Im so sick of all the engine boost BBs. Its really getting tiresome.
Obviously it was a refit after the war when they stole jet technology from the Germans 😅😂🤣🤣
They are adding more garbage to the game.
Love how the chat is comparing internet speeds at the start of the video. Wish I could get fiber internet services. But the best we get in the back woods of Vermont is either DSL provided by a phone company which sucked ass. But the best available for speed is Starlink. Can play online games like World of Warships but every hour and a half it will have a delay while acquiring the lead sat of the chain of satellites. It's enough of a delay to cause the game to disconnect. But for downloading large files it works great. Fiber may not be in my area any sooner than 2025 and then I am a sceptic because the phone company doesn't maintain its shit as it is. Fiber is even more maintainace intensive than conventional metal cable. So, I doubt the lazy shits will actually do their job and provide a good quality service.
Yeah fastest i can get where i am is 20Mb/s (was only 2Mb/s for a long time). I get seriously triggered when people complain they have to wait a whole hour to download a 100 gb game or something when it takes me an entire day lol.