What Is GraphQL? REST vs. GraphQL

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ย. 2022
  • To get better at system design, subscribe to our weekly newsletter: bit.ly/3tfAlYD
    Checkout our bestselling System Design Interview books:
    Volume 1: amzn.to/3Ou7gkd
    Volume 2: amzn.to/3HqGozy
    ABOUT US:
    Covering topics and trends in large-scale system design, from the authors of the best-selling System Design Interview series.

ความคิดเห็น • 196

  • @dmitrylubyanov7277
    @dmitrylubyanov7277 ปีที่แล้ว +172

    Probably the most easy to understand video I've seen about differences between REST and GraphQL. Thank you!

  • @Necessaryy
    @Necessaryy ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The graphics and animations are simply next level.

  • @youngKOkid1
    @youngKOkid1 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    GraphQL seems like an ambitious & interesting idea, as well as a horrendous footgun. Thanks for the wonderful explanation as always!

  • @golden_smiles
    @golden_smiles 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    It is most quick , constructive and comprehensive essence of knowledge without any extra BS payload like memes and distracting videos. Thank you, sir.

  • @MrPilz28
    @MrPilz28 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great work as always ! I'm really impressed by the quality of your slides

  • @casual_sky2
    @casual_sky2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a fantastic video! Thanks for the comparisons, it really helped me understand what was going on. I was having trouble understanding the concepts seeing as not many people explain it this simply and I didn't have time to dig into the documentation... Thanks a lot. I'll be sharing this video for anybody else who needs a quick, no fuss intro to graphql.

  • @molomekeys3938
    @molomekeys3938 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    the work on animation is incredible very inspiring

  • @RaymondPeckIII
    @RaymondPeckIII ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting. I implemented some similar features in the H2O-3 REST API framework back in 2015. You can white- or black-list fields, and specify which if any child objects to return in the payload, so you didn't have to make many REST requests and assemble an object graph yourself inside the client. The query language was just REST with a couple optional parameters on top of it. It doesn't require a schema (it's schema-on read, with automatically-generated rich metadata for the schemas), or a special query language. You just specify the field paths for any child or grandchild classes you want returned.
    The API is defined in a very lightweight way, simply by creating a parameterized class for each class in the API. No boilerplate, no IDL.

  • @dushyantchaudhry4654
    @dushyantchaudhry4654 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:11 to 2:21 a superb concise explanation of the difference.

  • @TwoWholeWorms
    @TwoWholeWorms ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Added this to our standard training tools. Brilliant job, looking forward to your future videos! ^^

  • @chamaraanu
    @chamaraanu ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best videos to grasp the idea of GraphQl.

  • @ramkanagu
    @ramkanagu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Nicely explained! In ten years down the line, GraphQL will be identified as an anti-pattern in the industry. Though it may seem very easy and attractive initially, it would become more complex once the schemas become big. REST is simple and easy to implement. The only caveat with REST is multiple api calls to backend. The better and a traditional approach should be by introducing orchestration services for any frontend that requires more complex data models from the back end.

    • @GameboyZoneRocks
      @GameboyZoneRocks 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can you give an example of orchestration services for frontend which will circumvent GraphQL? Your comment was interesting for me.

  • @khalilshaik6161
    @khalilshaik6161 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very clear explanation!
    instantly subscribed!

  • @SOMEONE-eq5bu
    @SOMEONE-eq5bu ปีที่แล้ว

    That was most well and detailed explanation I've seen
    Liked and subscribed

  • @SinnuC
    @SinnuC 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Complete brief video, thank you!

  • @juliahuanlingtong6757
    @juliahuanlingtong6757 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great piece!
    Would love to have a piece elaborate on the caching behaviors of HTTP GET leveraged by browser, CDN and servers mentioned in the video.

  • @nyplace1
    @nyplace1 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing animations, a very clear explanation, thank you!

  • @goldfishbrainjohn2462
    @goldfishbrainjohn2462 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like this channel.
    Valuable technical system design series.

  • @matthiasdebernardini3388
    @matthiasdebernardini3388 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    such a great video - love the channel!

  • @taunado
    @taunado ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful animations and explanation. Thanks.

  • @zoomzoom1889
    @zoomzoom1889 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you for this! extremally valuable resources, please keeping making this content

  • @JuliLukiKon
    @JuliLukiKon ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the explanation!
    That was very helpful!

  • @charuwaka1
    @charuwaka1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The way you explained is TOP NOTCH

  • @jacquesmatike9289
    @jacquesmatike9289 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good explanations ... good animations !!

  • @belhamyou2766
    @belhamyou2766 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic video, clear and short

  • @PlectrumShorts
    @PlectrumShorts 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Terrific overview and I *really* appreciate the caveats!

  • @eminberkay
    @eminberkay ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation, thanks! subscribed 👍

  • @deepanshukacher1536
    @deepanshukacher1536 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really clarify my understanding of their usage

  • @jamesT008
    @jamesT008 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To the point and precise explanation. Nothing bla bla !!
    Very nice!

    • @drift_ah1518
      @drift_ah1518 ปีที่แล้ว

      exactly what i thought - nice to spend exactly the minutes required to appraise oneself of a technology. plus i especially liked his no nonsense take on the pros and cons. a really good job/video

  • @usamesavas9848
    @usamesavas9848 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, very concise. Thanks for the video.

  • @vskovzgird
    @vskovzgird ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dude, you are the best. Thanks! Keep it up!

  • @pandyaakash5647
    @pandyaakash5647 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great Job buddy. Impressed

  • @aminaomar9173
    @aminaomar9173 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this great explanation.

  • @angelsancheese
    @angelsancheese ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the video! I learned something new

  • @sscapture
    @sscapture 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your videos! Thank you so much!! ❤

  • @whereispie
    @whereispie ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice and stylish tutorial, thanks

  • @ernestoginotome2453
    @ernestoginotome2453 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you very much for the explanation.

  • @mineralisk
    @mineralisk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the quality content.

  • @jashgopani32
    @jashgopani32 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video, animatin and presentation!

  • @tiagosutter8821
    @tiagosutter8821 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thanks for content! suggestion: Odata, or maybe a video about "Rest vs. Odata vs. GraphQL"

  • @alexandervashchuk7795
    @alexandervashchuk7795 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great breakdown, thanks

  • @manu144x
    @manu144x ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It always seemed to me that graphQL is only worth it beyond a certain level of complexity and when you're dealing with an extremely varied array of clients each needing different fields, different data, different implementations. This gives the clients maximum flexibility and you move a lot of the complexity to the client side. If you don't want to implement hundreds of endpoints and API's you just create the graphql middleware, schemas and you're good to go.
    But security is a big risk, you need to make sure sensible data is not being returned in any way, not to mention you introduce a lot more possibilities for bugs.

    • @tomu5642514
      @tomu5642514 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Exactly, for me it's pretty clear that the main use case of graphql it's one where you have as you said a varied array of clients who evolve independently from your api implementation and you have a complex data model that otherwise requires multiple endpoint implementations. Only in this case the tradeoff between this extra layer of complexity and cost it's worth for a business.

  • @userss9096
    @userss9096 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation!

  • @julivanespi
    @julivanespi ปีที่แล้ว

    great video. easy to understand

  • @dhirajnavale3861
    @dhirajnavale3861 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Finally this video has come 🥳🥳🥳, was waiting for so long. Thank you ❤️❤️❤️

  • @yp5387
    @yp5387 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    In my company we use GraphQL as primary API and it is not good. We are planning to move everything to REST api. Knowledge gap is the biggest trade off for us. New talent is having hard time wrapping their head around GraphQL queries. REST is pretty simple and easy to understand thus less development time for all the developers.

    • @alexkey9372
      @alexkey9372 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      same here. biggest mistake we've ever done. REST API is way more mature. when graphql reaches that point then we might re-consider.

    • @TheVasx
      @TheVasx ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Might be a bit of devs fault. New hire or not, graphql for FE is something you learn in a couple of days if you have some experience

    • @alexkey9372
      @alexkey9372 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@TheVasx in our case, it wasn't the knowledge gap but the performance. all graphql requests are POST, therefore is really hard to cache them. We thought for bigger project would be better, but that was proven to be a naive thought.

    • @TheVasx
      @TheVasx ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@alexkey9372 oh yea, if you depend on caching its all a big clusterfuck 🔥🔥

    • @yp5387
      @yp5387 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheVasx Agree. And sooner or later, caching will come into the picture for sure.

  • @cold_2477
    @cold_2477 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a beautiful and informative video.

  • @RafaelCorreaGomes
    @RafaelCorreaGomes ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing, thank you for sharing it!

  • @Ricardo-fg1bc
    @Ricardo-fg1bc ปีที่แล้ว

    your videos are pretty good!! thx

  • @user-rv1bx8hx4v
    @user-rv1bx8hx4v 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you! Great video.

  • @user-qy7mb5ho9e
    @user-qy7mb5ho9e ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic Motion animation btw

  • @eltreum1
    @eltreum1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    GraphQL was designed by Facebook to solve over fetching problems aggregating data lakes containing overlapping/duplicate data sometimes from uncontrolled 3rd parties for a global service that processes millions of write and read queries per hour 24/7. It can be useful for taming bloated data lakes or getting more out of old systems. If you are building a new system ground up you probably won't need it unless your data models are very complex with giant records, but probably a just bad design.
    I have seen startups fail because they wasted time and money on GQL when they didn't really need it or the complexity it adds made getting the service to work well difficult or fragile. Don't engineer like FB and Google until you are that big and make a system that gets the objective work done well and code it so it can grow and modularize later if needed.

  • @alejovillores6373
    @alejovillores6373 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video!

  • @eXit-mm3zg
    @eXit-mm3zg ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos!

  • @salamander1782
    @salamander1782 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos are a god send

  • @mohamedk.badenjki8781
    @mohamedk.badenjki8781 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the great video. What tool / software are you using for the video animation?

  • @dadno_sound4533
    @dadno_sound4533 ปีที่แล้ว

    Learned a lot here!

  •  ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Great video!
    But sincerely I would continue to use JSONAPI instead of GraphQL.
    JSONAPI is super nice, supported by a lot of frameworks and it's build around the specific fields to be fetched just when they are needed... not to mention the pre-build filters that you can specific on your resources and simplify the way you filter for particular records and collections

    • @sadashivshinde9150
      @sadashivshinde9150 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thats the biased devloper inside u

    •  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sadashivshinde9150 Maybe 😂

    • @orion.5611
      @orion.5611 ปีที่แล้ว

      which good resources are available for learning JSONAPI. i have found a small number and i dont understand it fully

  • @victormanuelfrancodev
    @victormanuelfrancodev ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explain! thanks

  • @andriikozakevych5669
    @andriikozakevych5669 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation! Clear and easy.
    Thanks a lot!

  • @TheRedbeardster
    @TheRedbeardster ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice one, thanks!

  • @user-qy7mb5ho9e
    @user-qy7mb5ho9e ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thx! So helpful!!

  • @mitotv6376
    @mitotv6376 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice explanation

  • @michaelcharlesthearchangel
    @michaelcharlesthearchangel ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice comparison!

  • @edwardokech4347
    @edwardokech4347 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Awesome video...receiving all resources from one request seems great for GraphQL. However, not sure about its security capabilities and the fact caching is a headache. As a lead Engineer, I'll recommend GraphQL for our internal tools still not convinced about using it in our production apps.

    • @M3t4lstorm
      @M3t4lstorm ปีที่แล้ว +7

      How would GQL differ from a security perspecific than any other HTTP based API...

    • @semosancus5506
      @semosancus5506 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@M3t4lstorm Makes you wonder about the Lead Engineer....

    • @vitorguidorizzzi7538
      @vitorguidorizzzi7538 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@M3t4lstorm Not really a security issue per se, but graphql makes it easier to write very expensive queries, rest can rely on basic rate limiting but graphql also needs to block clients spaming tremendously expensive requests

  • @ReflectionOcean
    @ReflectionOcean ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rest: simple to implement and use, with inefficiency in specific occasions because of multiple API calls required
    GraphQL: flexible and efficient to use, but complex to implement and use and often relies on extra tools

  • @code-tips
    @code-tips ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video 👏👏. Which tool are you using for making such great videos?

  • @YusanTRusli
    @YusanTRusli ปีที่แล้ว

    great video!

  • @romulosendoromulo
    @romulosendoromulo ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice, thanks!

  • @doronsvable
    @doronsvable ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Great Explentation

  • @swdRanaP
    @swdRanaP ปีที่แล้ว +2

    which software you use to crate this kind of animation video? please tell me. and thank you so much for shareing this wonderful explanation.

  • @allezvenga7617
    @allezvenga7617 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for your sharing

  • @sourabhjana1278
    @sourabhjana1278 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    cool explaination

  • @vlog.444
    @vlog.444 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super explanation

  • @thanhsonha7009
    @thanhsonha7009 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video.

  • @mokyyds
    @mokyyds ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Like, your video content is very professional, what software did you use to make the video? thanks

  • @thanhauco
    @thanhauco ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for great video, tRPC is now gaining growth and replace graphql

  • @starkest
    @starkest ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great explanation, as usual

  • @virtuoso_hub
    @virtuoso_hub 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great! how do you prepare your presentations? so beautiful!

  • @DF-ss5ep
    @DF-ss5ep ปีที่แล้ว +40

    To be fair, you can also accidentally do a full scan of a table in SQL too. Maybe it's just a bit less likely because developers who build the queries are more aware of what's in it than frontend developers

    • @yannistheodorakopoulos5916
      @yannistheodorakopoulos5916 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Totally agree on that. But the main misconception with GraphQL is the following:
      Maybe this is the biggest mistake in GraphQL implementations. While it is meant to be a form of contract between the client and the server, in which the backend side plays the role of the aggregator that fetches data from different sources, people use it to communicate with the database layer instead.

    • @kimovitch7
      @kimovitch7 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yannistheodorakopoulos5916 I thought it was obvious that graphql should be used as a backend for frontend more than for data access layer, guess people relying on it to do stuff it's not that good for...
      Graphql should just stay away from your domain/business layer

  • @GameboyZoneRocks
    @GameboyZoneRocks 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are two arguments I have against GraphQL -
    1. Why can't you write efficient REST APIs so they offer precise data in one call?
    2. Assuming GraphQL Apollo React client talks to Apollo backend server, I assume the Apollo backend server is doing more querying before returning precise data to the client. There is performance overhead on the server-side, GraphQL is just offering ease, not performance optimization.
    If my above two arguments are true, GraphQL will be replaced someday by an easy-to-use REST API abstraction on the server-side, this abstraction will offer the GraphQL benefits in REST.

  • @rahatsshowcase8614
    @rahatsshowcase8614 ปีที่แล้ว

    this was best ! because everyone was speaking regarding graphql directly and i was thinking its a sql languange XD

  • @wild_shaman
    @wild_shaman ปีที่แล้ว

    GraphQL is a marketing tool. It requires way more server work to be done for really rare usecase. Usually it's better to use json rpc with predefined request differs.

  • @shutanovac
    @shutanovac ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Frankly I didn't understand the part with the table scan that could bring the DB down. Someone care to elaborate please?

    • @YBuda101
      @YBuda101 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm not sure what the details are of his example, but as presented, that risk is possible with REST calls too. Unsure why he singled it out as a GraphQL problem

    • @DF-ss5ep
      @DF-ss5ep ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For example "find a user whose name matches a regex", and the name column in the DB has no index. In practice, I don't think such a query is likely to bring down the entire service, although it's possible. It would depend on how many of these queries are executed. In a bad scenario, all other queries become slow because the DB is overloaded, which causes more and more requests to accumulate, until everything fails. I don't know how GraphQL works, but with simple REST + SQL, you would use the circuit breaker pattern and use a "bouncer" (a proxy) in front of the db

  • @nickolaskraus
    @nickolaskraus ปีที่แล้ว

    I liked the nod to the SpaceX Dragon capsule in the GraphQL schema 😏

  • @Vedarta
    @Vedarta ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, but I don’t see the advantage of GraphQL over JSONAPI. Also, there are several open source implementationsfor JSONAPI.
    I would only maybe use GraphQL to describe relations not predicted by a JSONAPI REST API, if that much.

  • @whonayem01
    @whonayem01 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

  • @MythicEcho
    @MythicEcho ปีที่แล้ว

    I immediately went to your channel to watch more videos, but the count is very low. But thats the catch, quantity > quality.

  • @caro.girlwithflowers
    @caro.girlwithflowers ปีที่แล้ว

    good job bro :D

  • @MarcoLenzo
    @MarcoLenzo ปีที่แล้ว

    Which program do you use for animations?

  • @Lost1nTranslation
    @Lost1nTranslation ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video

  • @roman3249
    @roman3249 ปีที่แล้ว

    In previous video I just watched they told that n+1 problem is a problem of GraphQL approach, in this video they told that n+1 problem is a problem of REST approach 🤯

  • @samoniumuziejus
    @samoniumuziejus 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I would presonally just pass in an additional parameter to grab smaller or fuller version of the request, where some data could be nullable.. but if you really need that kind of flexibility then fine 😅 but is slower so...

  • @zaxx7884
    @zaxx7884 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GraphQL is great, but I'm a little worried about the delay when I put NodeJS as BFF in between. How do you all solution?

  • @chackokabraham738
    @chackokabraham738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey alex, good Video, how ever i have two questions
    1. Is Odata and graphql sort of the same I mean you can fetch by the query or am I right in saying that the schema of odata is different and way different than Odata ??
    2. Do we need a specific type of database like a nosql or graph db for querying such information ??

  • @ahmedeox
    @ahmedeox 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how is this in principle different from soap and exchangign wsdl schemas?

  • @satish1012
    @satish1012 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    any one understood at 4:21 . What he meant? How does the entire table span occurs?

  • @user-ib1pl5wg5w
    @user-ib1pl5wg5w ปีที่แล้ว

    Where are they better to use in terms of safety and cost?

  • @HANNAHSdigitaldiaries
    @HANNAHSdigitaldiaries ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it same persistent tables for GraphQL and REST? If so, can GraphQL guarantee atomic operations across tables?

    • @vitorguidorizzzi7538
      @vitorguidorizzzi7538 ปีที่แล้ว

      graphql is just a specification for http requests, it does not interfere with your tables.

  • @marvhan888
    @marvhan888 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5 star video