Indian stone tools Indian artifacts, how to identify ancient stone tools, axes pecking and grinding

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ต.ค. 2024
  • Stone artifacts found on the American Continent used by the Ancient inhabitants of the Americas including the American Indian. In this particular video a variety of wedge type stone axes are shown and compared to each other in their similarities and differences. Also those crafted through the method of pecking and grinding.

ความคิดเห็น • 344

  • @slapshot1x
    @slapshot1x 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Amazing-many of the "non descript" non typical artifacts I find in west Michigan sites look identical to the ones you found in Idaho. And the sites in Michigan are known occupied sites. I have learned a lot from this channel as I use to only look for items made with chert/flint/obsidian and quartz. Great vids. Thank you for sharing!

    • @georgehays4908
      @georgehays4908 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My wife and I have been arrow head hunting . We have many beautiful artifacts ! Peace , from Cass County MICHIGAN , USA ! Maranatha !

  • @jasonwil5600
    @jasonwil5600 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Some people only recognise knapped tools, but don't realise people didn't always have that skill, they made crude tools to get them by, simple as that. Beautiful tools came along much later. Oldowan tools look like natural breakage, but because they were found by "specialist, archeologist" they are amazing tools. We know more than these people think we do. Well done for finding these and keep ot up

    • @scottbryant2191
      @scottbryant2191 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      B.s. you cannot use a hardstone tool such as a hammer or a mano or an axe without either altering the stones surface to shape the tool or there has to be some evidence of wear use. You cannot hit a stone or use a stone against something without there being some evidence left behind. What you just said is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. You need to educate yourself and not blow smoke up peoples arses

    • @thomash4950
      @thomash4950 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In the United States that isn’t true. From the earliest evidence of man in North America we get some of the most refined tools ever made (Clovis, Folsom, dalton, Cumberland etc.) even some of the theorized pre-Clovis points they are still refined bifaces.

    • @stikaeric4301
      @stikaeric4301 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some archaeologists are saying man has been in America for 20,000 years-pre-clovis. Also as far as nice refined tools-- not as much East of the Appalachian mountains @@thomash4950

    • @jrosborne7634
      @jrosborne7634 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nothing but funky shaped rocks
      He’s obviously trying to and in fact has convinced himself these were native
      Everything on this table is a (jar) just a rock

    • @DonnyF-mu6ff
      @DonnyF-mu6ff 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are borderline retarded with the downtalk. There are millions identical in museums nation and WORLDWIDE...so go find your gay CLOVIS POINTS.

  • @sierraquigley1989
    @sierraquigley1989 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The comments is what kept me here

  • @quad50mg
    @quad50mg ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am finding similar tools . Always wondering if they are authentic or natural stones ?
    I am also finding stones that have obvious rubbing and grove marks in them , without hafting marks on them .

  • @vallll6658
    @vallll6658 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    SO WHAT I'VE NOTICED is that on like all the videos or forums i have found with great artifacts there's ALWAYS A BUNCH OF TROLLS commenting that what we're looking at are not artifacts and worth nothing. Never seen any other topic that is shit on as much! Great work and thank you. The info is greatly appreciated.

    • @matthewdarnell4654
      @matthewdarnell4654 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Val Loudfoot people only seem to be interested in spear points. half these "arrow head hunters" don't even realize they're hunting knives mostly.

    • @ericschmuecker348
      @ericschmuecker348 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Idiot!

    • @Dougarrowhead
      @Dougarrowhead 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      These arent artifacts. This guy william belongs in a loony tune asylum.

    • @jaypercival431
      @jaypercival431 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sorry but these "rocks" aren't worth trolling. Glue residue after 1000's years? Unbelievable. SMDH

    • @FarginIceholeful
      @FarginIceholeful 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jaypercival431 I have several hammer stones and abraders with resin and sand, like sandpaper on them. But they are only about 750-1,200 years old.
      Tell me, where abouts do you live? I live in southern Utah where broken points and stone tools litter the ground and there are ruins and petroglyph, every 500 feet.

  • @cryss_cross_curry
    @cryss_cross_curry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for sharing. I wish there was more information about these more "crude" artifacts. Youve inspirwd me to start my own channel and document mine.

  • @Guttergirl61
    @Guttergirl61 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful pieces! Thanks for sharing!

  • @rodneygreenwaymusic
    @rodneygreenwaymusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm trying to get into artifact collecting...but 90% of the time, I'm looking at a strange rock, holding it and trying to envision it's use, but I'm always questioning if it's natural. How do you know?

    • @roscoep.coltraine6344
      @roscoep.coltraine6344 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      💩 4 🧠's

    • @Jason1975ism
      @Jason1975ism 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rodneygreenwaymusic they don't know and I feel this video is inappropriate because of the misinformation. These aren't artifacts. When you find a tool you'll know it immediately. They are unambiguous. Even a plain rock that's used to shape other tools has distinct pock marks and wear that is indicative and impossible to mistake for natural erosion. When you find a flint or hard stone tool you'll instantly get goosebumps.

  • @happyhomelesshomesteaders158
    @happyhomelesshomesteaders158 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you William, we have found a few of those, and probably threw many pieces back down frown😞👀

  • @gilmangus83
    @gilmangus83 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You've identified some pieces I have but could not figure its use. The adz is an example.
    Well done! Thanks!

    • @cryss_cross_curry
      @cryss_cross_curry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same, I have several of that shape.

  • @cupsoflove1245
    @cupsoflove1245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'm so glad these are "just rocks" as per comments ..thus we can collect to our hearts content and not disturb artifacts right 😉

  • @charissekile6125
    @charissekile6125 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I sure wish you would make more videos. Ty for all your information and inspiration.

  • @bigbo1865
    @bigbo1865 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your spot on about them being used as all purpose tools. People want to subscribe only one use all to often when in fact they were swiss army knives for lack of a better term.

  • @helpdeskjnp
    @helpdeskjnp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for your time and showing us! It is appreciated!

  • @scottkraft1062
    @scottkraft1062 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thinks for sharing your collection I found a stone axe in Florida 400 miles away

  • @Lisaj4431
    @Lisaj4431 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I live in Indiana and have several Springs on my property and everytime I dig a posthole I find something, keeping them for my grandchildren.

    • @georgehays4908
      @georgehays4908 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I grew up in Lake County , Indiana . Near the Kankakee . It's near to Lowell Indiana . West Creek was my best place to go . Now all the fields are built on my old best places . 2 Tomahawk , many spear tips , a few knives , and many scrapers ! I'd go fishing , hunting , and dirt biking . ...then spend the whole day looking for arrow heading . Have you ever heard of the Great Marsh ? Great times in the early 70 ' s . Peace , from Cass County MICHIGAN , USA ! Maranatha !

  • @LaurensMuse77
    @LaurensMuse77 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    So many people posting think they are experts. Some old old old artifacts are worn down. So many were from early man. Not all artifacts are beautifully chipped chert or shiny pointy obsidian. Later on, sure. Experts on any subject all think outside the box. Try it folks.P.S. Don’t rip on me please. It’s my own self learned and thoughtful opinion. Cheers.

    • @williambrandondavis6897
      @williambrandondavis6897 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If that's the case then every creek I have walked in my entire 40 years has been literally filled with axe heads and other random ancient stone tools. It's a fact the natives learned how to shape the stones by observing how the river does it naturally. Only when you see things the river couldn't naturally do can you really be sure that whatever you found was actually made by a person. I did not see that in any of these pieces. I'm not saying they were not made by someone. What I am saying is with what we have to look at I couldn't say that I see anything that the river or creek couldn't have done by itself.

    • @LaurensMuse77
      @LaurensMuse77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      William Brandon Davis I can appreciate your opinion in part. But, your "fact" on natives learning how to shape rocks by watching the river do it is certainly questionable. In my 50 years of living and my 20 years of studying and collecting; not one time have I heard anyone suggest this theory. Not one professor; no avid collectors; haven't seen that in any books either. I guess anything is possible but in terms of debating, I don't think that's a very strong point; in my opinion. I'm always interested in figuring out why people in the field of artifacts and fossils are adamant that their knowledge is the law. I'm not picking on you; this is just a side note. Something I've experienced time and time again. It's just odd to me is all. Again, just a side note.

  • @rodhougenz
    @rodhougenz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've seen a pair of vice grips used as a hammer.

  • @365headhunter3
    @365headhunter3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Its amazing how many rocks you think are artifacts. Do you hear voices in your head as well?

  • @jeffvincent4827
    @jeffvincent4827 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great video, some people think that all artifacts are beautiful works of art and always made from flint or quartz , chert , jasper. fact is life was not easy especially if they lived in a region where those types stone did not exist.. they used whatever they could find and would make tools and point out of and they would do this very quickly and would make many of them. they can look like just natural stone to the uninformed, uneducated and they closed minded people that think all indians were proud stone smiths that walk the planet with their heads high and carried an arsenal of perfectly made Flint arrowheads and tools.. there were some amazing craftsman no doubt but also there were people on the verge of starvation and lived as savages.. I have a collection of around 2000 artifacts that are made from all different types of stone, every type of stone in my

    • @mrdark9916
      @mrdark9916 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah but you can't deny that several of these are obvious Geofacts. Lol
      I do see a couple pieces actually show some promise and I'd probably take home and look at them. But the rest of them are nothin lol

    • @jeffvincent4827
      @jeffvincent4827 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of course, some stones will look like an artifact but may not be, I won't argue that at all.. I guess what I'm really trying to say is that mainstream archeology has been proven to be all wrong..

  • @gypsyrosegypsyrose2531
    @gypsyrosegypsyrose2531 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    thank you for your interesting video. sorry so many rude people commented.

  • @ginnyeckartz3406
    @ginnyeckartz3406 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi William, thanks for the video, I enjoyed it. I have a few stones I found in my creek recently and was wondering if they're tools. Do you know of a website where I can send photos of them to see if they are genuine tools. I know that the Cherokee did inhabit the land around this area. My grandfather was Cherokee and it would thrill me to know I have something they left behind. Thanks!

    • @WilliamShira
      @WilliamShira  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you have a University nearby you might be able to find an Archeologist that would look at them. The stone age covers a large period of time and thousands of cultures and so archeologists have to specialize in their fields of study. It is nearly impossible to become an expert in every field of study. But some archeologists like to claim they are. Even if you are a leading expert in a certain field of study of the stone age,(and I would argue that nobody can claim to be so expert that they know all of the answers) there still are many unanswered questions and mysteries in the world of Archeology. So don't give up just because you are told that they are just stones or geofacts. Good luck.

  • @Seeds-Of-The-Wayside
    @Seeds-Of-The-Wayside 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I know I have found a couple rocks that look just like the adze you showed. I thought they looked interesting but I never thought to consider them as ancient tools! I'm definitely keeping my eyes out closer on weird rocks now, because I do live in an area where tons of Indians lived for a long time

  • @jaguarblack4332
    @jaguarblack4332 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I just figured it out. They're rock wedges to be placed in between already cracked rocks to brake them off, open, or to carve. You place one in between then use a pounder to pound it. It's like putting wooden pieces in between a car door to keep pride open. Also used to create images on walls and mountains. You can also place them under bigger rocks for transportation as to roll over.

  • @reubenpugliese234
    @reubenpugliese234 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have 2 stones that might be tools.... would you be able to know what they are or aren’t

  • @rockreader4298
    @rockreader4298 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this post, William. Very informative, as well as gives us good, clear images of different tools to look for.

  • @bambiw9665
    @bambiw9665 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you see the pictorial images in some of you artifacts?I've been collecting so many interesting pieces in oregon just inland of the coast from Lincoln city to eugene some Salem I lived upper part of Idaho and believe I found pre ice age artifacts crazy !

  • @kat-den
    @kat-den 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for all of this!!

  • @josefizquierdo6139
    @josefizquierdo6139 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Your collection of ancient artifacts in this video are impressively "all geometric with faces & edges." An inexperienced or uninterested person would believe that they're "just rocks," but what they don't know or realize is that these magnificent carved, ground, & shaped rocks were specifically formed that way for a variety of purposes, like cutting...hammering...starting fires...cooking...hunting...etc. Also, these unique ancient tools are usually found in common places where other types of relics or evidence can be found, usually around or close to natural bodies of water, ...like rivers, lakes, and ponds. Furthermore, many of these artifacts are "'incomplete, broken, or worn out" because of their age, their prior usage, or for other natural reasons, ...like erosion. Finally, not all ancient tools were just "arrowheads or weapons," either. Different tools had different functions or purposes, just like today's modern tools do. ⚙️🔧⛏️

    • @philmaida9997
      @philmaida9997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is no indication of and work by man on these tho

    • @joeywitt6491
      @joeywitt6491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wrong. Every rock he has are Natural formations.

  • @clintonzachary4942
    @clintonzachary4942 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This video is false. These are naturally fractured/weathered/eroded stones.

  • @voiceprotechtechnology8106
    @voiceprotechtechnology8106 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lovely video so details and meticulously

  • @jenniedentice6373
    @jenniedentice6373 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am in the UP right now and I found a cool stone I think might be an artifact. Slate I think and found at the Patoga campgrounds that was the permanent meeting place for Ojibway tribes. I would love to show you to get your opinion. Please reach out if you know a way I can do so if you are interested in seeing it. It is roundind and slightly flat on one of the ends. Two little notches across from each other on side. Front side is totaly rounded and smooth and the back side is chipped two sort of triangular shapes diagnal from each other and the two other spaces smooth. Or if you know a place I can have it looked at? University?

  • @officiallilhippy
    @officiallilhippy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    when native Americans done something, they done it RIGHT!...I think them are just earth formed rocks Sir

    • @RightWingCon81
      @RightWingCon81 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      official.lil.hippy yeah, all native Americans made super refined tools. They never did anything half assed. They were a perfect people. Clown.

    • @kennethcochran1339
      @kennethcochran1339 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you are right

    • @ericschmuecker348
      @ericschmuecker348 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnnyhighwoods1780 You need to do the research. Good God you Fucking Prick!

  • @Jason1975ism
    @Jason1975ism 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    not slate, slate is also not volcanic, not a tool of any kind on this table. this is what we professional Archaeologists call geofacts. nice try and it is cool you have a passion but you have nothing here made, modified, or used by people.

    • @FarginIceholeful
      @FarginIceholeful 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Professional? Wow you've never set foot in a museum? Dude I've been on several digs in Arizona/Utah where plenty of those same examples have been found. You are a damn liar! 😂😂😂😂

    • @Jason1975ism
      @Jason1975ism 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FarginIceholeful I stand behind my statement, THERE'S NO ARTIFACTS OF ANY KIND. Slate tools exist but these ain't them. You are the liar. 99% of archaeology doesn't happen in museums 😂. You're a fool.

    • @Jason1975ism
      @Jason1975ism 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FarginIceholeful I replied to your stupid remark but it vanished. Yes, archaeology is all about the museum. And basalt and slate are the same thing. I'm sorry I doubted your discerning eye. These artifacts are probably worth millions of dollars. Handle them with care and watch out for Nazis.

    • @FarginIceholeful
      @FarginIceholeful 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Jason1975ism Yeah it sounds like you know absolutely nothing. I'm not even an archeologist and I can tell these are tools. If they are just "rocks", then tell me how I have several of these that are EXACT copies of the same "rock".

    • @Jason1975ism
      @Jason1975ism 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FarginIceholeful okay fine, put them on a website for sale and sell just 1, for any price. I'll wait. Go ahead. Or take them to your local museum and get another opinion. Or better yet, find a local arrowhead collector and see what they offer. These aren't man made tools. You can get snarky all you want and I'll still be right. If they were artifacts I would be glad to identify them for free. I would spend time explaining everything about them. But they're not artifacts. I'm not going to humor anyone and get their hopes up. These are leaverites and geofacts. Pseudo morphs. Plain semi angular river rocks.

  • @unknownuser2737
    @unknownuser2737 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We have a saying that we say in the artifact collecting community. If you have to defend it don't own it! They should speak for themselves just looking at them. This rule also is used for any type of a collectible Hobby

  • @kellydugger2132
    @kellydugger2132 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you tell me where I can get how much is paid for artifacts and effigies ?

  • @bigbo1865
    @bigbo1865 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The only thing I disagree with is the characterization of some the "hafted" pieces. I'm not convinced of hafting
    There is no doubt as to them being artifacts dont get me wrong but mostly hand held as opposed to hafted artifacts.🤔

    • @suzannejackson3810
      @suzannejackson3810 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      what does hafted even mean? aren't there more than one ways to reach the same result?

  • @tunahelpa5433
    @tunahelpa5433 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Very controversial claim. They tell you to read the books about flint tools and how they are made. Did they watch the video? Number 1, these tools are NOT flint. Number 2, they are not found in situ because who wants to carry 100 lbs of rocks everywhere they go. Number 3, they are uninformed because there are no books on these, what I call blunt stone tools( to distinguish them from ground stone tools. ). Number 4, I will write the book and then the scientists will be able to run scientific tests to prove or disprove it; after which everyone who doubted you will be honor-bound to recant.
    But until then, these are no more than geofacts ( I like to call geofacts "naturals", because I had to call them something. There are naturals that follow these paradigms. Sometimes.
    I find mine in parking lots, my own front yards, vacant lots, etc.
    The key would be if they cannot be found in, for instance, Europe or Australia or northern Alaska.
    How many do you have and what states are they from? Just curious.

  • @eastcoastlithics
    @eastcoastlithics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sorry but these are just rocks

  • @kylerjanovec3906
    @kylerjanovec3906 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You need help

  • @chefgajendrajoshi5212
    @chefgajendrajoshi5212 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very... Good.. Video and information

  • @christinagehret
    @christinagehret 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi sir my name is Shawn I have a bunch of Indian tools and rock carvings also and I'm just learning I'm very interested in old stuff always have. I got some cool stuff I like to show you if you could get back to me be very thankful I love that my area has alot of this ancient old stuff. Sometimes I think that there were started than alot of ppl nowadays lol. But please if you get time get a hold of me mean alot and you really know your stuff watched all your videos.

  • @Chief2Moon
    @Chief2Moon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To all the critics, yes, a grooved & polished stone axe or finely polished celt with a sharpened bit defies argument. But in defense of this video, the fact that these stones aren't as obviously or intensively worked doesn't necessarily mean they weren't used, or picked up by an Indian &used as is,or until he found time to finish them. Some do,in my opinion show signs of human alteration, those that are less conclusive would still serve the purpose of hand axes or breaking bone to extract marrow.. If they came from a known village or campsite, this would assist in tipping the scales in their favor.

  • @cupsoflove1245
    @cupsoflove1245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lovely . I'm finding tons if these in New Mexico.

    • @bty1471
      @bty1471 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bet you do. They are just rocks there everywhere

  • @calypso123able
    @calypso123able 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have hundreds that I have collected, nice to see this

  • @jonnyochowa7609
    @jonnyochowa7609 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very nice.
    Some people cant see the tool marks..and lack any imagination whatsoever.

  • @brightmanonfire
    @brightmanonfire 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I've been collecting artifacts since I was a kid-in Florida, Massachusettes and California. I know what to look for. I hate to break it to you but NONE of the rocks pictured look like they have been worked. The tell tale signs are not there. Check out some museums to see what you are looking for.

    • @hansenator5000
      @hansenator5000 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      what part of CA?

    • @MedicalSkillsTraining
      @MedicalSkillsTraining 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      brightmanonfire you are a fucking idiot.

    • @ADITADDICTS
      @ADITADDICTS 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've been collecting rocks from N. California going on 20 years now and I've found some perfect and polished pieces and I've found some that to an untrained eye WOULD look like ordinary river rock. Look for the diamond in the rough.

    • @ADITADDICTS
      @ADITADDICTS 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @athena icaria thank you!

    • @ADITADDICTS
      @ADITADDICTS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Ryan Ross Absolutely, same over here as well. Most tools, plummets and charmstones ( God I hate that name but grooved rocks some say net weights etc ) are found in rice fields in very black dirt, almost a clay, due to it being a giant swamp/river drain.
      Before that it was an inland sea ( Sacramento valley-butte sink ). The really nice pieces are usually attributed to burials, and the rougher pieces to hunting and fishing locations. Although different time periods are also a factor.

  • @John-wh3re
    @John-wh3re 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good job great artifacts

  • @lewandlo
    @lewandlo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very interesting ,thanks for the great video sir. Cheers from Canada

  • @tonywhitaker2202
    @tonywhitaker2202 ปีที่แล้ว

    The first one you showed is a bear head! Pretty cool!

  • @artifactman660
    @artifactman660 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Your joking right?

    • @trenttillman747
      @trenttillman747 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That is nothing but a rock you idiot

    • @jacobbradenbaugh2035
      @jacobbradenbaugh2035 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This bitch is a fucking idiot

    • @LaurensMuse77
      @LaurensMuse77 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Jacob Bradenbaugh why do you have to be so mean dude? Some of them could be rocks. Some are old and weathered fragments. I’ve been studying and hunting artifacts for the better part of 30years. After a while, things become unmistakable to your eye. Now, I won’t say whether this guy has something or not because i prefer it to be in my hands but i will say, old old weathered pieces are abundant and most people would not recognize it at all. Unless you know, ya don’t really know. Ya know?

    • @Mav8887.
      @Mav8887. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@LaurensMuse77 are you joking?????? Not one artifact in this video. Your just as dumb as the guy in the video

    • @tallygator2436
      @tallygator2436 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Without holding in your hand I would say your the idiot Indians where very resourceful and would use anything they could to get a particular job done

  • @gabriel19551
    @gabriel19551 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Sorry William but you have no artifacts there.

  • @rupeshpal4470
    @rupeshpal4470 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @AG-cs7px
    @AG-cs7px 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What is "volcanic slate". Believe what you want to believe but keep it to yourself.

  • @cindytroutman1104
    @cindytroutman1104 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like your collection. I have many artifacts similar to yours. I also have some large clubs.

    • @WilliamShira
      @WilliamShira  10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think it is fun to try and understand these ancient inhabitants. Thanks for your interest.

  • @bty1471
    @bty1471 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    No these are just rocks

  • @onthehunt9502
    @onthehunt9502 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I found what i think is a tool. Do you have an email that I could send a few pictures to ?Thank you

  • @buddesatva
    @buddesatva 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Slate is a metamorphosed sedimentary rock, not volcanic (igneous).

    • @tomb306
      @tomb306 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's not difficult?

  • @jmejnovotney8942
    @jmejnovotney8942 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    People assume all Native American artifacts have to look like arrowheads & have points, which they don't. You definitely have a few nice tool artifacts!

    • @zacharynugent83
      @zacharynugent83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Belinda Belinda Baits Bray cool that’s not what he said

    • @indoril9489
      @indoril9489 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey that's not archaeology

    • @joeywitt6491
      @joeywitt6491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Where is artifacts. All i see is plain ole run of the mill naturally formed ROCKS. Quit misleading beginning collector/hunters.

  • @Don-fj3ew
    @Don-fj3ew ปีที่แล้ว

    I found many with markings being triangular carved markings and cuniform like markings as well as stick like figure carvings of men and animals. On facebook i posted few and people just were ignorant unless i posted my knapped heads

  • @harleyrider6633
    @harleyrider6633 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just a bunch of rocks, I didn't see any flaking marks on any of them... jmo

    • @dr.staceyashley5122
      @dr.staceyashley5122 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ashley

    • @tallygator2436
      @tallygator2436 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      harley rider66 they where made by peck and grinding method. So no flaking

    • @williambrandondavis6897
      @williambrandondavis6897 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tallygator2436 Tools made using that method have divots and grooves strategically placed to allow the sinew to wrap around the stone in a manner that prevents the head of the tool from slipping off the handle when you swing the tool. Try strapping any of those stones to a handle and see how well that tool works, the heads will fall right off because there are no shoulders to keep the sinew from sliding off the angled shape of the alleged stone tool.

    • @blindingshadow3463
      @blindingshadow3463 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@williambrandondavis6897 could you give me your opinion on a few of my finds? I agree with you 100%. And believe most axes were hand held, but I finally found something different, something unique.

  • @bobbymcdowell9694
    @bobbymcdowell9694 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice. 🏹

  • @ImmersionImagery
    @ImmersionImagery 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love your videos! I know you are on a journey to learn more about what you have. With regards to what the tools are made from it looks like the majority are basault. (Slate has cleavage planes that make it difficult to nap.) The adze tools you mention with the pitting marks look like they are from Vesicular Basalt- formed as magma reaches the surface, as pressure decreases dissolved gasses are able to come out of the solution, forming gas bubbles.

  • @scottlund4562
    @scottlund4562 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1st example could be an FCR type of modification (fire cracked rock) A close example showing similar features can be seen at 07:05 of this blacksmith forge building video: th-cam.com/video/m-R6iY-mY-Y/w-d-xo.html Percussion, pecking, and grinding are not the only methods of purposeful alteration and reduction.

  • @nikonslowmotion9145
    @nikonslowmotion9145 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful

  • @jamescarrick9752
    @jamescarrick9752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Those look like the Paleo indian artifacts that have been found in Texas, and other sites.
    I, too, have found many of this same shape.
    Looking with magnifier/'scope, marks made by Man can be seen.

    • @dickdanger2235
      @dickdanger2235 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I've found many of these same types of tools in the Ozarks too.
      If a rock or stone catches your eyes and looks out of place. It probably is.

  • @peallen92
    @peallen92 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice rock collection

    • @harry-cj6wu
      @harry-cj6wu ปีที่แล้ว +1

      right? they don't have any indication of human wear or manipulation 😂

  • @joeywitt6491
    @joeywitt6491 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Before you make educational videos, ide suggest learning the difference between worked and naturally formed rocks.

  • @madisoneclectic3101
    @madisoneclectic3101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These are actually Leaverites and Ohyeahrites.

  • @Runswithfathog
    @Runswithfathog ปีที่แล้ว

    I found something just like the ax at 4:44 but mine is more polished it seems. I thought it was an axe when I found it then talked myself out of it. When you pulled that one out I gasped lol

    • @EvilSkeltos
      @EvilSkeltos หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, I think I agree with your analysis.... I like to look around for old artifacts sometimes when I'm exploring outdoors, and I think I might have come across am artifact at a glance quite often. I always end up disregarding them as just old rocks shaped by the erosion of time in the end....

  • @mikewhorleyjr3892
    @mikewhorleyjr3892 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nice video but these are common creek rocks...good luck though

  • @gamgamdabest8327
    @gamgamdabest8327 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If I sent you a picture of something that’s been in my family for generations and I just inherited… but those ahead of me no longer remember which tribe it comes from… could you help me possibly identify it?
    My family (bio) is plains Indian. However, the man that this came from married into the family generations ago. Those who should be able to remember are too old to remember which tribe or what area of the USA his people came.
    I’d love to know more about this piece. If you’d look & not be able to help, I’d still appreciate your help and time.

    • @nathansharp3193
      @nathansharp3193 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Try to find a facebook group or reddit page and ask there. You'll probably have better luck than asking on youtube. I hope you find someone to share the knowledge you seek.

  • @jak3589
    @jak3589 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    These are natural sandstones smoothed out by water & notches come about by other rocks hitting it as it tumbled in the water maybe you should research more

  • @chuckjones9939
    @chuckjones9939 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You should take those to an artifact show and let the people who have handled true artifacts evaluate them. Once you have seen and handled actual human made artifacts, you will never think that any of those rocks have been modified by humans.

  • @dougjenkins9549
    @dougjenkins9549 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Son, all you have is sex stones, we call them f---ing rocks.

  • @SLArtifacts
    @SLArtifacts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    All of these appear to be natural. Hard stone artifacts are a real thing, but it doesn’t appear there are any in this collection. Pecking and grinding do not look like that. Keep looking!

    • @mrdark9916
      @mrdark9916 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For god sakes, finally someone who agrees lolol
      I have some nice hard stone and pecked/ground stuff.
      But I see only 1 or 2 pieces here that I would even bother taking home to examine further lol a lot look natural

  • @briankennedy5578
    @briankennedy5578 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Those are just rocks. Nature did all the creating

    • @josefizquierdo6139
      @josefizquierdo6139 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They're just rocks...but carved by ancient men.

    • @briankennedy5578
      @briankennedy5578 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@josefizquierdo6139 A couple of them may have been. Some of them are just rocks. Like the first one he shows. Looks just like a common piece of shale. It naturally breaks off making shapes just like that. They start off with sharp jagged edges. Then after being subject to water and tumbling around they get rounded and smooth. I could go outside right now and find several rocks similar to the ones he showed. I could even find them in places where it would be evident that tfty were natural.

    • @briankennedy5578
      @briankennedy5578 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hell ive got a rock that looks just like a snickers bar. Color and all.

    • @grymm13th
      @grymm13th 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You know how much information about ancient civilizations is covered up? Especially since the us government would have to give back all the Indian land if they could prove that it was theirs?

  • @edierosenberg4777
    @edierosenberg4777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please contact me? I live close to Coloma ca. And have interesting rocks.

  • @atlasjoyner4633
    @atlasjoyner4633 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks
    Atlas here. I recently picked up a couple Points ,both ancient and I started seeing lots of faces on lots of rocks
    Now I'm sitting on a ton of this stuff.Whats my next move.Thanks again.you are only contact so far

    • @bryanweidler8992
      @bryanweidler8992 ปีที่แล้ว

      There seems to be quite a lot of artwork on many of these stones/tools. Maybe related to sympathetic magic type thing or maybe just telling their story. Common images I have in NW PA near Lake Erie--faces, skulls, people from head to toe, cats, raccoons, frogs, turtles, woolly mammoth, fish, bear, dogs and a wide array of twisted crazy looking faces. Some of them have a pronounced 3D factor to them. I'm pretty sure I've even seen some dinosaurs and an alien or two, but IDK, I thought I saw Grandpa Simpson on one so now I do what the experts supposedly do--ignore the artwork and/or don't even try to make out what it is (which translates to spending hours looking at them with Loupes, various microscopes and other devices so I can be on youtube at 3AM talking about aliens on rocks). Anyway, don't get too caught up in some of the things you see or you might need to put em' away for a while.. I realize this is 7 months later but hoping this helps (especially since some people will likely not see the same things you see on these rocks, and in some to many cases, will not see anything).

  • @carriminatifanpage15
    @carriminatifanpage15 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good

  • @ingerziiii
    @ingerziiii 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I found this extremely helpful. Thank you for posting

  • @jimmcdees1341
    @jimmcdees1341 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I honestly don't think any of them where true tools

  • @deranged248
    @deranged248 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    lol nice rocks bro

  • @309schaefer9
    @309schaefer9 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Just like every other rock in any creek. Sorry guy, not even close to the real deal.

  • @burjazz
    @burjazz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fascinating. Thanks for sharing.

  • @monkeybutttt1
    @monkeybutttt1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    You seem like a nice guy but you are reaching. These aren't worked.

  • @jezebel-uh4qr
    @jezebel-uh4qr 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have hundreds of the exact tool and I can find fifty or sixty within thirty minutes. People think unless it's not arrowhead or a long sexy spear, it's not legit. I've found a tomahawk with a raised blade twirled around it, if you can imagine such, I've found knives, picks, hammers, axe heads etc etc...oh and lastly, on my last pick, I found a white sandstone with rusted metal around it. We're trying to find out if leather could have turned to such.

    • @WilliamShira
      @WilliamShira  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My sentiments exactly. Thank you for your comment.

    • @jezebel-uh4qr
      @jezebel-uh4qr 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      William Shira
      You're welcome

    • @Dougarrowhead
      @Dougarrowhead 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh yes absolutely leather always turns to metal.

  • @lesjones5684
    @lesjones5684 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bones and notches 😂😂😂

  • @roundeye6519
    @roundeye6519 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When they are found in a mound of indian artifacts that lends credibility to the hypothesis that yes they were probably useful. You can find many sticks .... but if it has an arrowhead stuck to it yes it could be coincidence but the arrowhead lends credibility to the scenario

    • @tunahelpa5433
      @tunahelpa5433 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe that Mr Shira has not robbed archaeological sites. That would be destructive and illegal. Professional Archaeologists should do that.

    • @chasecarter1170
      @chasecarter1170 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@tunahelpa5433 lol your logic is so flawed it's ridiculous.......

  • @garyloger9416
    @garyloger9416 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good video.

  • @williamcrawford7982
    @williamcrawford7982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No door stops.

  • @crazyhorse9378
    @crazyhorse9378 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    not trying to be mean but do some research I've been hunting arrowheads for a long time and tools of the Native Americans and these are not Native American artifacts find Camp Rocks find fire Stones find flint chips then find your points hi Rich tops feeder Creek's feeding the main creeks then feeding the rivers like I said Camp Rocks Flint chips points

    • @erikakoons5691
      @erikakoons5691 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @athena icaria ❤❤❤

    • @jasonbuckman7298
      @jasonbuckman7298 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well that's because your a ARROW hunter. These tools styles where used by paleoIndians who did not shot arrows. But used spears and pecked and ground. Start to read more. Instead of replaying your algorithmic idiocracy.

    • @nox7282
      @nox7282 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jasonbuckman7298 His comment says “and tools of the Native Americans”. Did you miss that? You were typing so fast to try to prove your “intelligence” and defend falsehood that you didn’t even comprehend what the original comment says

  • @doesthatstink4734
    @doesthatstink4734 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Leaver rights

  • @scottlund4562
    @scottlund4562 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That first stone could have been altered by fire on purpose and would be called an FCR. From one football sized rock I now have 5 slabs very similar to those sitting on a barrel next to my fire pit. It is amazing how the fractures "look" like some one whacked it, but they are only scars from the intense heat fracturing...as to frost or freezing being the cause, I have seen greywacke split into multi-planes along the Mississippi, but not in that pattern, but I do not know Utah winter's or lithics either.
    The example @09:43 that looks very similar to what I use to shape and polish rib bone into knives or fish points, I found that 1/8th inch hinge helps give me control to shape the rib not only consistently, but quickly before I remove too much material and it separates.

  • @maartenperdeck798
    @maartenperdeck798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    natural stones

  • @cryss_cross_curry
    @cryss_cross_curry 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The artifact at 6:38 has a clear and distinct face on it. Undeniable and certainly artificial, I don't care what anybody says to the contrary.

    • @EvilSkeltos
      @EvilSkeltos หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree, I think it's apparently a grinding stone tool used for mashing grains like corn possibly...? I'm just trying to search for a method for identifying native American limestone tools... I guess they were crafting edged blades used for hunting or battle. Along with tools for preparation in butchering animals or harvested agricultural resources. I know porus stone splits and weather's naturally though so I guess they mean there needs to be a clear sign of either symmetrical design or weathering from deliberate uses that purposefully align with each tools intended uses...?

  • @stevendominguez1055
    @stevendominguez1055 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great video

  • @richardmills6084
    @richardmills6084 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow, tuff crowd. Im not sure what these are , man made or natural but give the guy a break.

  • @fishheadthefisherboy7533
    @fishheadthefisherboy7533 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interested I finally found out what this rock is it's the old in the left of the begging of video very left lol

  • @timbritton1313
    @timbritton1313 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good day Will. I am finding stone artifacts as in your video around the TN River. Basalt. Utilitarian purposes or weapon if need be. I've found one projectile point of the same period within 100 feet of several dozen of these stones.