NM7 5 Gauss Quadrature

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @evanjones8049
    @evanjones8049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have been trying to learn this for hours now and this is the only video that I was able to understand. Thank you so much!

  • @juniorcyans2988
    @juniorcyans2988 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We just did this in class today, but I didn't understand. Now I feel good! Thank you so much!

  • @rahmaakareem3955
    @rahmaakareem3955 ปีที่แล้ว

    I tried to learn this concept from the text book.. it took me an hour but was nothing in ma head.. but this video... worth every sec i listen..

  • @lentil68
    @lentil68 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the best video i think i've ever seen. Ty!

  • @itinerantscientist8502
    @itinerantscientist8502 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks! Great video for engineers. I'm currently trying to understand how do they apply Gauss Quadrature to estimate the composition of hydrocarbon mixture based on TBP curve.

  • @johannschonwald2304
    @johannschonwald2304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    does anybody know how to solve those nonlinear equations for four variables ?? nobody explains that, and it is very confusing that in the scripts from university it is only written: "one can solve those and see, that..." also in this video there is no concrete algorithm, maybe newton/banach?? im confused

    • @craighalpin1917
      @craighalpin1917 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you figured it out... if so I'm trying to figure it out right now...

    • @DeckerCreek
      @DeckerCreek 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/3jilhl2zp9A/w-d-xo.htmlsi=8A8EA6nho00_qiUX

  • @patrickmoore6351
    @patrickmoore6351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was extremely helpful. Thank you for the explanation!

  • @yeratret8010
    @yeratret8010 ปีที่แล้ว

    U are the best!

  • @empty7990
    @empty7990 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    But how these constant values u find

  • @DanaWebb2017
    @DanaWebb2017 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats pretty clever method.

  • @eduardofabris8523
    @eduardofabris8523 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so so much! It helped a lot

  • @abelhecker
    @abelhecker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome explanation, thanks a lot :)

  • @ivanluthfi8832
    @ivanluthfi8832 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you for the explanation, very useful

  • @huzash6977
    @huzash6977 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are a god

  • @WithASideOfFries
    @WithASideOfFries 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Watching the introduction, I'm a bit confused. Why not use optimization to find critical points that represent the most optimal x-values to produce a trapezoid that best approximates the area under the function?

    • @numericalmethodsguy
      @numericalmethodsguy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If we do that, then we will have computationally inefficient algorithm as the critical points would vary from function to function. Moreover finding them would be itself a challenge.

  • @GundoganFatih
    @GundoganFatih 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, very nice explanation.

  • @byronohene-adu5104
    @byronohene-adu5104 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation. Thanks!

  • @andres111999
    @andres111999 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    muy buena explicación. se entendió todo.

  • @Amr-hb2wh
    @Amr-hb2wh 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Thanks a lot for this explanation but when you say plug that function in Gauss Leg. @ 14:44 what do you mean by that as it seems my only problem to get ahead on this problem, thanks again for the help.

    • @31337flamer
      @31337flamer 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      u cant use the function inside the integral from start (2x + 3/x)^2 .. u need to use the shifted version to get your result
      he uses the new term inside the new integral for I to use it as f.
      he is shifting the boundaries so u need the new values for x in your starting function. thats what its all about .. shift to (-1, 1) -> calculate shifted x for your function and "plug it in" use it as your f to get the approximated result.

    • @Amr-hb2wh
      @Amr-hb2wh 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's never too late,as a matter of fact you replied just in time for my test tomorrow, Thank You.

    • @shudidesai
      @shudidesai 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I mean it sometimes is too late, like if he replied the day after your test? ;?

  • @solomontamirat1355
    @solomontamirat1355 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    how to calculate 20 node brick element in finite element method

  • @wil8538
    @wil8538 ปีที่แล้ว

    15:18 i calculated this and result is I=25,8322, but difference between I and true I is 0,0011 and in video its 0,0012 so its almost the same, interesting...

  • @michaelcastrillon6372
    @michaelcastrillon6372 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gracias

  • @sandlouis5046
    @sandlouis5046 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!!!!!!!!

  • @abelhecker
    @abelhecker 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks !!!!

  • @kepler_22b83
    @kepler_22b83 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thnx

  • @ninakoch1799
    @ninakoch1799 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank youuuuuu😍❤️