I respect Neil’s articulate way of speaking, he trims the unnecessary words and tangents off and makes the idea effortlessly streamlined allowing it to be immediately understandable.
He had a lightning in a bottle mind. Einstein built on his ideas to explain even more. That is how we progress. As Newton, himself, said "If I have seen further than others it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". We are lucky to live in a world they lived in.
@@peterd788 Exactly right. If Newton didn't exist, Einstein couldn't do what he did. Newton truly is the man. Moreover, the industrial age, the electrical age, urbanization, the computing age, and AI could not exist without calculus and his laws.
Thanks for your video, highly appreciated. Compliments of the Season. BTC price is in a precarious location, the asset set a new all-time high just days ago but is currently below the record and starting to decline. analysts suggest that the latest rally above $32.000 could have been triggered by aggressive buying from institution investors on coin base, as suggested by the large premium of about $350 compared to the price in binance....The shifting momentum is now presenting in technical indicators supplying bearish movement, adding to the double top narrative that’s been building since failing to break $30,000.?? This being taken into note, it can’t be more obvious that trading Bitcoin is way more profitable than just holding and waiting for the price of Bitcoin to skyrocket. I didn’t think it was possible to make constant win from trading till I came across Carlos Andrewfx program for investors/newbies who lack understanding on how trading Bitcoin works, to help them recover loss from the crash and also stack up more bitcoin, he provided me with %100 signal and with his strategy i was able to increase my portfolio from $4000 to $42,000 in just a week, I was convinced to say his an expert, with Andrew help. You can easily get to him on Instagram (@carlos_andrewfx or WhatsApp+19715122836......
@Amogh Sharma Bullialdus suggested inverse square gravity in 1645 when Newton was 5. After Huygens gave his expression for centrifugal force it was obvious that Kepler's 3rd law implied inverse square gravity for circular orbits. That is what Halley, Hooke and Wren were discussing in 1864. Does inverse square gravity also imply elliptical orbits and all three Kepler's laws? So Halley paid Newton a visit in the summer of 1864 and asked him what paths would planets follow if the sun's gravity fell off with inverse square of distance. Newton replied ellipses, that he had calculated it. And so he had in the years of 1676 and 1677. Newton had started working on the problem in 1665. The notion of inverse square gravity had been around for awhile. Newton's accomplishment was showing it implied Kepler's laws. It was quite the bomb shell when Principia was published. It was Halley's question that prompted the writing of Principia. But no, Halley's "dare" didn't prompt Newton to figure out elliptical orbits. Halley had figured it out 7 years earlier. And no, Newton did not figure it out in two months. 1665 to 1677 is more like 12 years. And no, Halley's dare did not prompt Newton to invent calculus. Newton made his calculus contributions from 1665 to 1668. Nearly two decades before Halley's "dare". It was Newton's older Cambridge colleague Isaac Barrow that steered Newton towards calculus. Barrow, Fermat, Descartes, Cavalieri and others had laid the foundations of modern calculus in the generation before Newton and Leibniz. Barrow made Newton aware of this work in 1665. Newton spent the next 3 years organizing these ideas and adding his own innovations. So, no, Newton didn't invent calculus on Halley's "dare" either. And it didn't take Newton two months. More like three years building on decades of collaborative efforts of many people. Just about everything Tyson says about Newton is wrong.
Neil really put the intelligence of Newton into perspective when he threw in the galloping horse. For Newton to do what he did at that time with mankinds understandings was truly remarkable.
I was never in to science during school, partly down to poor teaching , thanks to Dr Tyson I’ve rediscovered the joy of knowledge and discovering our universe
Your teachers were constrained by a need for rigor and accuracy. Neil is not. He can make up whatever bull shit that makes his presentation entertaining and his fans have no clue. Perhaps one of the sloppiest, most inaccurate pop science celebrities who have every lived.
@@taylorcharles5329 He has done practically zero research since his dissertation in the 90s. Most of his stuff has been flashy and often inaccurate pop science and history.
I like that. He's saying, one day when new equations are established that unifies physics of the large and the quantumly small, it won't mean that Einstein's shit was wrong. It won't discredit him in anyway. It will simply expand our ability to explain the world around us
Newton came up much of his physics and mathematical work in a short “academical exile” period. It is widely knows that it was not even his preferred field. He spent much of life Deciphering biblical texts (of which he thought were meant for him) and being obsessed with alchemy.
If microscope had been invented during Newton's era , we would not have needed any other scientists as Newton would have discovered quantum mechanics and every other physics discovery made till now...... Newton is my favorite ,NO hate for Einstein though
@@marianskodowski8337 As Far as I know, Run Ze Cao ("Ze Buceta" for the closest ones) is just a Jackass pushing a conspiracy to gain notoriety; Dr. Hosenfelder as educated as she can be, she still has to bow for the great scientists who came before her.
I love both Newton And Einstein. 1st Newton, 2nd Einstein . Before these , Micheal Faraday 😁. Till 1900s (20th Century), Physics And Mathematics Were Already Growing on the Top... And Genius such as James Clerk Maxwell, and Many More Were Already Born, #Sir Albert Einstein Did his Work bcoz of Copernicus, Galileo Galilee, Sir Issac Newton , Maxwell, Lorentz, etc..... Don't forget this. In the Era of Newton there Wasn't developed physics and mathematics .
Deeper understanding....I see the science established by the Church is still following g the Church’s example of refining our understanding of the world. Good job.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s brilliance isn’t merely his obvious intellect but his ability to convey the awe and wonder hidden within the mysteries of our universe, his passion for driving scientific inquiry and discovery and the humbleness with which he generously shares this bountiful knowledge.
Thanks for your video, highly appreciated. Compliments of the Season. BTC price is in a precarious location, the asset set a new all-time high just days ago but is currently below the record and starting to decline. analysts suggest that the latest rally above $32.000 could have been triggered by aggressive buying from institution investors on coin base, as suggested by the large premium of about $350 compared to the price in binance....The shifting momentum is now presenting in technical indicators supplying bearish movement, adding to the double top narrative that’s been building since failing to break $30,000.?? This being taken into note, it can’t be more obvious that trading Bitcoin is way more profitable than just holding and waiting for the price of Bitcoin to skyrocket. I didn’t think it was possible to make constant win from trading till I came across Carlos Andrewfx program for investors/newbies who lack understanding on how trading Bitcoin works, to help them recover loss from the crash and also stack up more bitcoin, he provided me with %100 signal and with his strategy i was able to increase my portfolio from $4000 to $42,000 in just a week, I was convinced to say his an expert, with Andrew help. You can easily get to him on Instagram (@carlos_andrewfx or WhatsApp+19715122836......
It's almost poetic how the conflict and eventual reconciliation between Newton and Einstein's laws is a perfect example of Hegalian dialectics. Both unmatched legends of scientific genius, who's theories seemingly contradict each other, but beautifully resolve the apparent contradiction on reaching a higher level of understanding and closeness to the truth.
Google products that shit is stupid funny. Don't agree with it, just laughing at your evangelic beliefs based on a conglomerate of satanic rituals for which you believe are holy.
Similarly quantum mechanics can be applied for solving classical mechanics problems for macroscopic particles, a new enclosure doesn't mean the previous theory was wrong. It's just the better understanding of what we did earlier.
I like the chronological explanation of Uranus orbit due to a missing Neptune to give credence to Newton laws follow by how Newton laws fail with Mercury orbit.
I love him so much. He explains these concepts in ways that everyone can understand. I could watch his interviews for hours. I have a serious crush on him too. Nothing sexier than a smart man with a sense of humor.
Does he help you understand the material? I think not. If you had some understanding you would notice when he gets it wrong. He screws up basic math, science and history embarrassingly often.
@@alucardhellsing7435 Yup, Tyson was often on that subreddit. He was such an easy target the mods had to ban Tyson posts. The addled fool can also be found on r/badmath and r/badscience. He's a frequent flyer on r/badhistory. Tyson is a source of misinformation. But he gets away with it because his fans are dumber than a bag of rocks.
@@HopDavid its a guarantee to get things a bit wrong when u oversimplify complex topics so normal ppl can understand. I doubt he could've graduated in astrophysics if he didnt know his stuff.
@@alucardhellsing7435 He flunked out of his astrophysics program at University of Texas. His advisors there suggested he pursue a different career, that he had little aptitude for physics. And I tend to agree after watching him botch freshman physics. How'd he get his doctorate at Columbia? I'm sure R. Michael Rich noticed that he was a charismatic and popular lecturer. I believe Rich & co awarded Tyson his credentials hoping he'd be a influential advocate for astronomy and science. Not because of any talent or competence in physics. Charisma and political skills can get you far. Even in Academia. Especially in Academia.
Both were right, cause there's this thing called paradigm. A paradigm is the reason scientists gather to study shit. Now, paradigms can't be wrong, because they're the ones who throw questions to the scientists studying them, and they also answer them. Now, what happens with Newton and Einstein is nothing more than an update; the paradigm that Newton suggested is right, but it had it's flaws, although no one thought about it's flaws because you normally don't question a paradigm. Except you do, and this is when a scientific revolution begins; when you question the paradigm itself, you start a scientific revolution, and that's what Einstein did. This doesn't mean that Newton was wrong, it's nothing but an update in order for the paradigm to fit into a much larger field of study. Sorry bout my english btw.
Real scientists like him too never compares any scientists as all people who contributed to a great journey of exploration of curiousity never feel shames if they're wrong as they knew they could again redifine it. Also before comparison first almost you become like them, dare to invent a new thing which is still yet unknown to community and then dares to compare with another.
Thanks for your video, highly appreciated. Compliments of the Season. BTC price is in a precarious location, the asset set a new all-time high just days ago but is currently below the record and starting to decline. analysts suggest that the latest rally above $32.000 could have been triggered by aggressive buying from institution investors on coin base, as suggested by the large premium of about $350 compared to the price in binance....The shifting momentum is now presenting in technical indicators supplying bearish movement, adding to the double top narrative that’s been building since failing to break $30,000.?? This being taken into note, it can’t be more obvious that trading Bitcoin is way more profitable than just holding and waiting for the price of Bitcoin to skyrocket. I didn’t think it was possible to make constant win from trading till I came across Carlos Andrewfx program for investors/newbies who lack understanding on how trading Bitcoin works, to help them recover loss from the crash and also stack up more bitcoin, he provided me with %100 signal and with his strategy i was able to increase my portfolio from $4000 to $42,000 in just a week, I was convinced to say his an expert, with Andrew help. You can easily get to him on Instagram (@carlos_andrewfx or WhatsApp+19715122836......
The human race is in its infancy. We have barely begun to scratch the surface of a scratch when it comes to understanding the universe and all it’s complexity.
The universe is a vast and intricate place, with countless stars, galaxies, planets, and mysteries waiting to be explored. While we have made significant strides in understanding various aspects of the universe through scientific discoveries, we are still at the early stages of comprehending its full complexity. Throughout history, human knowledge and understanding have evolved through the accumulation of insights, experimentation, and observations. As technology and scientific methods advance, we gain deeper insights into the natural world and our place in the universe. Yet, there is still much more to learn, and the quest for knowledge and understanding remains ongoing. As we continue our exploration and study of the universe, it's essential to remain curious, open-minded, and receptive to new ideas and discoveries. The journey to uncover the secrets of the cosmos is a never-ending pursuit that spans generations and inspires wonder and awe.
whenever dealing with the universe never forget the philosophers David Hume's criticism of induction that induction rests on the notion that nature is uniform and the only way to discover nature is uniform is through induction hence all of science rests on circular reasoning at its foundation being induction, when ever you reason from the observed to the unobserved you face this issue, in this way science is great whatever theories we have we must keep on pushing to seek their limits.
A small quibble. The term "calculus" was used by Gottfried Leibniz, a mathematician who developed calculus independently of Newton, around the same time as Newton. Newton used a different term, "fluxions" which has since disappeared as Leibniz's term became the one used by mathematicians. One doesn't want to take anything away from Newton, he was indeed a genius, but Leibniz also deserves some credit for calculus.
I have a question if all the matter was at one point during the big bang why was there not just one big black hole nothing can escape from? I've never heard this question been ask I think it's a pretty good question.
TH-cam sources "Crash Course Astronomy" and "PBS Space Time" discuss all that we know so far on this topic. Basically, if I recall correctly, all matter that exists today was in a different state at the big bang-before quarks were even formed-and the (electromagnetic/thermal?) repelling forces acted upon them far greater than that of attractive gravity... of which black holes didn't begin forming until the universe cooled down enough for galaxies to coalesce, etc.
None can compare SIR NEWTON .He was not only a GREATEST PHYSICIST but also A GREATEST MATHEMATICIAN,THEOLOGIAN,GEOGTAPHISICT,AUTHOR and A GOOD PERSON as well.
@@subashkc7674 in mathematics he was not even close to Einstein Newton created a whole new area and he was considered as the Best mathematician in the world at that time
Kuhn argued newtonian conservation of mass is incommensurable with special relativity. Now, I'm not knowledgeable enough to extensively defend that position, but it would imply that Neil is wrong here. Any thoughts?
Mass is conserved (constant for all isolated systems) but mass adds differently in relativity. Technically, mass is the norm of a systems 4-momentum and so mass follows 4-vector addition.
I know almost nothing about physics, but I'm sure when Neil was asked who was right, Einstein or Newton, he said "Tyson, yes, Tyson is always right"... Then he held his hands like Mr. Burns and called everyone in the room idiots for not being him.
From my research on gravity it seems to me that there are TWO kinds of acceleration. One kind is real, meaning if there is a force on an object then it will be considered to be accelerating, and it will have weight. The other kind is an illusion, or an apparent acceleration. If you have weight, but feel as though you're standing still, then objects that are actually standing still will seem as if they are accelerating instead of you. Anytime an object has weight there will be a force on it, whether or not the object is observed to be accelerating, traveling at a constant speed, or standing still. Anytime an object does not have weight then there will not be a force on it, whether or not the object is observed to be accelerating, travelling at a constant speed, or standing still. Apparent acceleration can also mean an object has real acceleration but is actually standing more still than you. Or in other words it will have less force on it than you. My research also seems to indicate that the idea of apparent acceleration is not taught in schools. According to Einstein, to stand still with a static weight, you are accelerating up from a force at 9.8 meters/sec/sec. Less force upward less acceleration, and you will be falling with apparent acceleration, with a lighter than static weight. Free fall, would be no upward force, you are then weightless with an apparent downward acceleration at 9.8 meters/sec/sec. Brian Greene tells Alan Alda there is no gravity in free fall. NIST WTC FAQ 31 "the upper section came down essentially in free fall." Shyam Sunder John Gross "gravity was the driving force." th-cam.com/video/E43-CfukEgs/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/XRr1kaXKBsU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/MxE8N5IAFWg/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/GuLL_upE4zk/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/_GjIgJPn47E/w-d-xo.html
Tyson Loves to talk and make grand statements, no one disagrees on climate changing. The question is the impact man has and can he control it without killing off 7 or 8 billion?
MrYort13 he gets a wonderful high from the emotion he feels when he hears the echo of his great voice the man's a great orator & he loves to have an audience he's well respected but his ego is getting out of control he needs meditation ASAP
I was just making fun of Harvinder. I'm usually don't care about seemingly simple language mistakes but I found this one quite idiotic. But not as bad as yours. At least I know what he meant. I don't even know if you intended there to be a question mark after 'say'.
Both are right. Newton talks of G and the force of gravity on mass in free space. Einstein introduced the concept of curvature of the fabric of 4-D spacetime. He predicted the black hole formed when and where gravity causes nuclear changes in the fifth dimension.
i'm advocating for a house of scientists (as opposed to a house of lords - what do they know) on this side of the pond, maybe the US could do the same.
She got them to agree on the global warming and he immediately backtracked and corrected his statement. It's not that there isn't global warming, it's not that humans haven't aided in global warming. It's the amount and the overall effect and impact it will have is contested
Contested by whom? 100% of the scientific organizations that have put out an official statement on this topic agree that 1) the planet is warming and 2) the primary driver of this warming is human activity. Here is the list: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Federal Climate Change Science Program (US), Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, European Academy of Sciences and Arts, InterAcademy Council, International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences, Network of African Science Academies, Royal Society of New Zealand, American Association for the Advancement of Science, European Science Foundation, National Research Council (US), American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians, American Society for Microbiology, Australian Coral Reef Society, Institute of Biology (UK), Society of American Foresters, The Wildlife Society (international), American Geophysical Union, Canadian Federation of Earth Sciences, European Federation of Geologists, European Geosciences Union, Geological Society of America, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society of London. American College of Preventive Medicine, American Medical Association, American Public Health Association, Australian Medical Association, World Federation of Public Health Associations, American Meteorological Society, Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, Royal Meteorological Society (UK), World Meteorological Organization, American Quaternary Association, International Union for Quaternary Research, American Astronomical Society, American Chemical Society, American Institute of Physics, American Physical Society, American Statistical Association, Engineers Australia (The Institution of Engineers Australia)
The fact that humans were able to predict the existence and location of Neptune from Newton's calculations, is a testament of his genius. Meanwhile 400 years later we still have people swearing by god that they don't think, they KNOW that the Earth is flat.
Lot of people in the comment section writing about Newton and Einstein, but I’m watching Neil and the host. I do believe the host was smitten ❤😊 by Mr. De Grasse! Judging from the “laws of attraction” that have nothing to do with the universal constant of gravity, she was blushing 😊, laughing flirtatiously, etc. I’m surprised she didn’t fix (play) with her hair!
I respect Neil’s articulate way of speaking, he trims the unnecessary words and tangents off and makes the idea effortlessly streamlined allowing it to be immediately understandable.
How ironic that you are writing in this way.
best way to describe Neil. spot on👌🏻
He's a science communicator. That's why he's so famous
I think you could have been more terse.
Andy Gray working on it myself 😭👌🏻
Neptune: thanks Newton, my man
😂😂😂😂
Newton was beyond genius. He was working out this stuff in the 1600s. Absolutely incredible intellect.
He had a lightning in a bottle mind. Einstein built on his ideas to explain even more. That is how we progress. As Newton, himself, said "If I have seen further than others it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". We are lucky to live in a world they lived in.
@@peterd788 don't forget Michael Faraday, electromagnetism is the most important thing
@@peterd788 Exactly right. If Newton didn't exist, Einstein couldn't do what he did. Newton truly is the man. Moreover, the industrial age, the electrical age, urbanization, the computing age, and AI could not exist without calculus and his laws.
Genius. Noooo
Newton was arguably the one and only chosen genius of humanity. One of a kind.
"...then he turned 26"
@sebatian so what's your contribution to the world of science? xD
@@haciendohora2711 well, does laughing and automatically looking at comments in every Uranus videos count? 😂
Thanks for your video, highly appreciated. Compliments of the Season. BTC price is in a precarious location, the asset set a new all-time high just days ago but is currently below the record and starting to decline. analysts suggest that the latest rally above $32.000 could have been triggered by aggressive buying from institution investors on coin base, as suggested by the large premium of about $350 compared to the price in binance....The shifting momentum is now presenting in technical indicators supplying bearish movement, adding to the double top narrative that’s been building since failing to break $30,000.?? This being taken into note, it can’t be more obvious that trading Bitcoin is way more profitable than just holding and waiting for the price of Bitcoin to skyrocket. I didn’t think it was possible to make constant win from trading till I came across Carlos Andrewfx program for investors/newbies who lack understanding on how trading Bitcoin works, to help them recover loss from the crash and also stack up more bitcoin, he provided me with %100 signal and with his strategy i was able to increase my portfolio from $4000 to $42,000 in just a week, I was convinced to say his an expert, with Andrew help. You can easily get to him on Instagram (@carlos_andrewfx or WhatsApp+19715122836......
Halley asked Newton about orbits when Newton was in his 40s. Most of what Tyson says about Newton is addled nonsense.
@Amogh Sharma Bullialdus suggested inverse square gravity in 1645 when Newton was 5. After Huygens gave his expression for centrifugal force it was obvious that Kepler's 3rd law implied inverse square gravity for circular orbits.
That is what Halley, Hooke and Wren were discussing in 1864. Does inverse square gravity also imply elliptical orbits and all three Kepler's laws?
So Halley paid Newton a visit in the summer of 1864 and asked him what paths would planets follow if the sun's gravity fell off with inverse square of distance. Newton replied ellipses, that he had calculated it. And so he had in the years of 1676 and 1677. Newton had started working on the problem in 1665.
The notion of inverse square gravity had been around for awhile. Newton's accomplishment was showing it implied Kepler's laws. It was quite the bomb shell when Principia was published. It was Halley's question that prompted the writing of Principia.
But no, Halley's "dare" didn't prompt Newton to figure out elliptical orbits. Halley had figured it out 7 years earlier.
And no, Newton did not figure it out in two months. 1665 to 1677 is more like 12 years.
And no, Halley's dare did not prompt Newton to invent calculus. Newton made his calculus contributions from 1665 to 1668. Nearly two decades before Halley's "dare".
It was Newton's older Cambridge colleague Isaac Barrow that steered Newton towards calculus. Barrow, Fermat, Descartes, Cavalieri and others had laid the foundations of modern calculus in the generation before Newton and Leibniz. Barrow made Newton aware of this work in 1665. Newton spent the next 3 years organizing these ideas and adding his own innovations.
So, no, Newton didn't invent calculus on Halley's "dare" either. And it didn't take Newton two months. More like three years building on decades of collaborative efforts of many people.
Just about everything Tyson says about Newton is wrong.
Neil really put the intelligence of Newton into perspective when he threw in the galloping horse. For Newton to do what he did at that time with mankinds understandings was truly remarkable.
" Can I slip something in? " and the precedes to talk about Uranus. LOL!
I was never in to science during school, partly down to poor teaching , thanks to Dr Tyson I’ve rediscovered the joy of knowledge and discovering our universe
Your teachers were constrained by a need for rigor and accuracy. Neil is not. He can make up whatever bull shit that makes his presentation entertaining and his fans have no clue. Perhaps one of the sloppiest, most inaccurate pop science celebrities who have every lived.
Or maybe because some teachers care about their jobs and some don’t. Did you ever think about that???
What if I told you this science wad not taught to newton?
I see your post is 4 yrs old, but I hope you've continued your science journey. 😊🖖
He could easily do stand up comedy. What an amazing person.
But Tyson sucks when it comes to math, physics and history.
He is a comedian scientist.
@@jarrygarry5316 It is a stretch to call him a scientist.
@@HopDavid he is a scientist tho
@@taylorcharles5329 He has done practically zero research since his dissertation in the 90s. Most of his stuff has been flashy and often inaccurate pop science and history.
I like that. He's saying, one day when new equations are established that unifies physics of the large and the quantumly small, it won't mean that Einstein's shit was wrong. It won't discredit him in anyway. It will simply expand our ability to explain the world around us
Newton came up much of his physics and mathematical work in a short “academical exile” period. It is widely knows that it was not even his preferred field. He spent much of life Deciphering biblical texts (of which he thought were meant for him) and being obsessed with alchemy.
Ma man 👍👍👍
Newton sure the fuck isn't Tyson's man. Tyson fucks up his history of Newton pretty badly.
We don’t need heros; everyone has the potential.
Potential is non-existent beyond a thought, just like fantasies. Only when it becomes concrete it starts to exist in the world of five senses.
Actually, potential does exist... PE(grav) = mass • g • height
Idk hero's are pretty important
Everyone doesn't have the potential. Only a few. And from that few comes geniuses. That's why they are so rare.
Ok
If microscope had been invented during Newton's era , we would not have needed any other scientists as Newton would have discovered quantum mechanics and every other physics discovery made till now......
Newton is my favorite ,NO hate for Einstein though
You do realise Newton stole a lot of the ideas/theories from other scientists from his Era right?
Name few of the scientists whose ideas were stolen by Newton...I bet you'll look into Google to prove your point .....
@@user-on4nx2ho7b what a joke
@@user-on4nx2ho7b like?
@@user-on4nx2ho7b I think you mistook Newton for edison...edison is the one who stole other scientists idea
Who does not get amazed by Dr. Tyson's knowledge and charisma.
I think Run Ze Cao and probably Sabine Hosenfelder
@@marianskodowski8337 As Far as I know, Run Ze Cao ("Ze Buceta" for the closest ones) is just a Jackass pushing a conspiracy to gain notoriety; Dr. Hosenfelder
as educated as she can be, she still has to bow for the great scientists who came before her.
A lot of what Neil Tyson says is bull shit.
@@HopDavidand the rest is sh1t lol
I love things that are so abstract that it blows my mind.
We need more people like Neil deGrasse! He is one of deGrasse
This pun omg
What
neIl degrAsse loves to hear the sound of his own voice, he just loves it more than anything else. If you need more narcissists around, well....
The world needs less people like him. Certainly anything to do with math and science needs a much greater mind that his. He's a clown
i love the sound of his voice
EINSTEIN also discovered photoelectric effect, Special Theory of Relativity, e^2= m^2c^4 + p^2c^2, the paper on brownian motion. When he turned 26
You can't compare GODFATHERS of SCIENCE, you see
But he had a group of tools to build his theories, he had the tools. Newton INVENTED his own tools
@@luisfabricio6439 Newton had all the tools from ancient Greece and china
@@luisfabricio6439 the basic elements of calculus came from ancient Greece
Always a delight to listen to the Guru of Astrophysics Neil deGrasse Tyson. Thanks, YT and Discovery Panda.
Well hes just a fanboy and a good marketable tool, hes not a revolutionary heap your praise on newton and einstein
This was excellently explained
I love both Newton And Einstein. 1st Newton, 2nd Einstein . Before these , Micheal Faraday 😁.
Till 1900s (20th Century), Physics And Mathematics Were Already Growing on the Top... And Genius such as James Clerk Maxwell, and Many More Were Already Born,
#Sir Albert Einstein Did his Work bcoz of Copernicus, Galileo Galilee, Sir Issac Newton , Maxwell, Lorentz, etc..... Don't forget this.
In the Era of Newton there Wasn't developed physics and mathematics .
Great interviewer. She was so into it. Really reflected the ideal audience member.
She was school girl crushing on Neil 😊
He speaks with such fire
I am still surprised how this video doesn't have a million views. It's so mind-blowing everytime i watch it.
A lot of what Tyson says about Newton is wrong.
Deeper understanding....I see the science established by the Church is still following g the Church’s example of refining our understanding of the world. Good job.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s brilliance isn’t merely his obvious intellect but his ability to convey the awe and wonder hidden within the mysteries of our universe, his passion for driving scientific inquiry and discovery and the humbleness with which he generously shares this bountiful knowledge.
Thanks for your video, highly appreciated. Compliments of the Season. BTC price is in a precarious location, the asset set a new all-time high just days ago but is currently below the record and starting to decline. analysts suggest that the latest rally above $32.000 could have been triggered by aggressive buying from institution investors on coin base, as suggested by the large premium of about $350 compared to the price in binance....The shifting momentum is now presenting in technical indicators supplying bearish movement, adding to the double top narrative that’s been building since failing to break $30,000.?? This being taken into note, it can’t be more obvious that trading Bitcoin is way more profitable than just holding and waiting for the price of Bitcoin to skyrocket. I didn’t think it was possible to make constant win from trading till I came across Carlos Andrewfx program for investors/newbies who lack understanding on how trading Bitcoin works, to help them recover loss from the crash and also stack up more bitcoin, he provided me with %100 signal and with his strategy i was able to increase my portfolio from $4000 to $42,000 in just a week, I was convinced to say his an expert, with Andrew help. You can easily get to him on Instagram (@carlos_andrewfx or WhatsApp+19715122836......
It's almost poetic how the conflict and eventual reconciliation between Newton and Einstein's laws is a perfect example of Hegalian dialectics.
Both unmatched legends of scientific genius, who's theories seemingly contradict each other, but beautifully resolve the apparent contradiction on reaching a higher level of understanding and closeness to the truth.
Neil could've hit that
lol
Clavers Odhiambo man she's basically sitting on his face.
Dawg just stfu and go sit on ur bible ... Real men with actual ideas are talking
I've seen this Goggle products account on a bunch of science vids. It's a bot account.
Google products that shit is stupid funny. Don't agree with it, just laughing at your evangelic beliefs based on a conglomerate of satanic rituals for which you believe are holy.
Such an engaging communicator.
I love your cosmos series on National Geographic
That attracted me to sci
Season 2 is coming...
Really when
Sometime next year. th-cam.com/video/7SFR4Xz5-_U/w-d-xo.html
ence
Where is the complete video? Is it on TH-cam? What is it called?
I Love how he explains things out! I don't agree with everything he says, but how he approaches what he talks about is great!
I love the enthusiasm he has for his subject. Just makes it even more to listen to
Similarly quantum mechanics can be applied for solving classical mechanics problems for macroscopic particles, a new enclosure doesn't mean the previous theory was wrong. It's just the better understanding of what we did earlier.
it is worng therfore it is not able to explain it
@@allhdmoviescene1294it’s like saying since there are always exceptions we should not bother with putting up rules.
That's the thing about scientific theories. They're called theories because they can be expanded upon as new information is collected.
Neil: Uranus is the planet just beyond Jupiter.
Me: Well that was helpful...
Lol
He actually said Saturn instead of Jupiter
@1:57
Whoa! (In Ted Theodore Logan's voice -Ref: Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure). Mindblown!
So well explained.
I like the chronological explanation of Uranus orbit due to a missing Neptune to give credence to Newton laws follow by how Newton laws fail with Mercury orbit.
At 0:04 Neil face is priceless. What do you think running in Dr. Tyson mind at that moment?
I love him so much. He explains these concepts in ways that everyone can understand. I could watch his interviews for hours. I have a serious crush on him too. Nothing sexier than a smart man with a sense of humor.
Does he help you understand the material? I think not. If you had some understanding you would notice when he gets it wrong. He screws up basic math, science and history embarrassingly often.
@@HopDavid r/iamverysmart
@@alucardhellsing7435 Yup, Tyson was often on that subreddit. He was such an easy target the mods had to ban Tyson posts.
The addled fool can also be found on r/badmath and r/badscience. He's a frequent flyer on r/badhistory.
Tyson is a source of misinformation. But he gets away with it because his fans are dumber than a bag of rocks.
@@HopDavid
its a guarantee to get things a bit wrong when u oversimplify complex topics so normal ppl can understand.
I doubt he could've graduated in astrophysics if he didnt know his stuff.
@@alucardhellsing7435 He flunked out of his astrophysics program at University of Texas. His advisors there suggested he pursue a different career, that he had little aptitude for physics. And I tend to agree after watching him botch freshman physics.
How'd he get his doctorate at Columbia? I'm sure R. Michael Rich noticed that he was a charismatic and popular lecturer. I believe Rich & co awarded Tyson his credentials hoping he'd be a influential advocate for astronomy and science. Not because of any talent or competence in physics.
Charisma and political skills can get you far. Even in Academia. Especially in Academia.
I can listen to him for hours
What if the universe is made of a matrix of strings that don't move and as we move through them they change their wavelength like pixels on a screen?
3 laws of motion were present 2000yrs before Newton.
Vaisheshik sutra book ( 2nd to 6th century as per Wikipedia)
Available on net
The interviewer is so star struck... she is all over my man ... Neil degrees Tyson...
Yes this is the real universal law of attraction that has nothing to do with gravity!😅
Both were right, cause there's this thing called paradigm. A paradigm is the reason scientists gather to study shit. Now, paradigms can't be wrong, because they're the ones who throw questions to the scientists studying them, and they also answer them.
Now, what happens with Newton and Einstein is nothing more than an update; the paradigm that Newton suggested is right, but it had it's flaws, although no one thought about it's flaws because you normally don't question a paradigm. Except you do, and this is when a scientific revolution begins; when you question the paradigm itself, you start a scientific revolution, and that's what Einstein did. This doesn't mean that Newton was wrong, it's nothing but an update in order for the paradigm to fit into a much larger field of study.
Sorry bout my english btw.
I love this Guy.
Real scientists like him too never compares any scientists as all people who contributed to a great journey of exploration of curiousity never feel shames if they're wrong as they knew they could again redifine it. Also before comparison first almost you become like them, dare to invent a new thing which is still yet unknown to community and then dares to compare with another.
Maybe for a brief time in the 90's Tyson did some mediocre science. He hasn't been a real scientist since then.
Hollister David you're an uneducated idiot
Could you provide me with a list of your publications, please?
Shubhankar
Settle down r/iamverysmart Yoda
gotta love this guy
Love the last sentence by him. 😄😄😄
Thanks for your video, highly appreciated. Compliments of the Season. BTC price is in a precarious location, the asset set a new all-time high just days ago but is currently below the record and starting to decline. analysts suggest that the latest rally above $32.000 could have been triggered by aggressive buying from institution investors on coin base, as suggested by the large premium of about $350 compared to the price in binance....The shifting momentum is now presenting in technical indicators supplying bearish movement, adding to the double top narrative that’s been building since failing to break $30,000.?? This being taken into note, it can’t be more obvious that trading Bitcoin is way more profitable than just holding and waiting for the price of Bitcoin to skyrocket. I didn’t think it was possible to make constant win from trading till I came across Carlos Andrewfx program for investors/newbies who lack understanding on how trading Bitcoin works, to help them recover loss from the crash and also stack up more bitcoin, he provided me with %100 signal and with his strategy i was able to increase my portfolio from $4000 to $42,000 in just a week, I was convinced to say his an expert, with Andrew help. You can easily get to him on Instagram (@carlos_andrewfx or WhatsApp+19715122836......
I could listen to this man all day
what does he says as a final statement at 6:14 please!
Emergent scientific truths assert this
"She's Miss Earth,... please" 😂😂
Neil must start a youtube and talks about stuff like this all day. He would have billions of views!!
The human race is in its infancy. We have barely begun to scratch the surface of a scratch when it comes to understanding the universe and all it’s complexity.
The universe is a vast and intricate place, with countless stars, galaxies, planets, and mysteries waiting to be explored. While we have made significant strides in understanding various aspects of the universe through scientific discoveries, we are still at the early stages of comprehending its full complexity.
Throughout history, human knowledge and understanding have evolved through the accumulation of insights, experimentation, and observations. As technology and scientific methods advance, we gain deeper insights into the natural world and our place in the universe. Yet, there is still much more to learn, and the quest for knowledge and understanding remains ongoing.
As we continue our exploration and study of the universe, it's essential to remain curious, open-minded, and receptive to new ideas and discoveries. The journey to uncover the secrets of the cosmos is a never-ending pursuit that spans generations and inspires wonder and awe.
love this guy!
I successfully copy-pasted numerous journals to make my thesis on Solar Panel before I turned 26 😎
What would the science without Neil DeGrasse Tyson?
Boring.
He brings life to it :)
Each one have it own capacity . Both given some thing to society.
whenever dealing with the universe never forget the philosophers David Hume's criticism of induction that induction rests on the notion that nature is uniform and the only way to discover nature is uniform is through induction hence all of science rests on circular reasoning at its foundation being induction, when ever you reason from the observed to the unobserved you face this issue, in this way science is great whatever theories we have we must keep on pushing to seek their limits.
PASSION !!!
Wow..aku Lyn video ni..asal
A small quibble. The term "calculus" was used by Gottfried Leibniz, a mathematician who developed calculus independently of Newton, around the same time as Newton. Newton used a different term, "fluxions" which has since disappeared as Leibniz's term became the one used by mathematicians. One doesn't want to take anything away from Newton, he was indeed a genius, but Leibniz also deserves some credit for calculus.
In fact actual calculus is leibniz calculus.
Brilliant.
Urinous, the yellow planet.
It depends on your ethnicity.
Uranus*
R Nickerson r/woooosh
I have a question if all the matter was at one point during the big bang why was there not just one big black hole nothing can escape from? I've never heard this question been ask I think it's a pretty good question.
TH-cam sources "Crash Course Astronomy" and "PBS Space Time" discuss all that we know so far on this topic. Basically, if I recall correctly, all matter that exists today was in a different state at the big bang-before quarks were even formed-and the (electromagnetic/thermal?) repelling forces acted upon them far greater than that of attractive gravity... of which black holes didn't begin forming until the universe cooled down enough for galaxies to coalesce, etc.
None can compare SIR NEWTON .He was not only a GREATEST PHYSICIST but also A GREATEST MATHEMATICIAN,THEOLOGIAN,GEOGTAPHISICT,AUTHOR and A GOOD PERSON as well.
and what about einstein?
He was an alchemist lmao
@@subashkc7674 in mathematics he was not even close to Einstein
Newton created a whole new area and he was considered as the Best mathematician in the world at that time
@@loiman4179 Why do you see only the negative attributes of a person?
" and A GOOD PERSON as well" -> well no one can deny you the courage to uphold a minority view ;)
Interviewer is acting like a 14 year old.
Says the one who uploads video game clips on youtube
Sakriya Stha Baral 🤣🤣🤣 be nice
I recognized that immediately.
come on, she is innocent.
more like 10.
Kuhn argued newtonian conservation of mass is incommensurable with special relativity. Now, I'm not knowledgeable enough to extensively defend that position, but it would imply that Neil is wrong here. Any thoughts?
Mass is conserved (constant for all isolated systems) but mass adds differently in relativity. Technically, mass is the norm of a systems 4-momentum and so mass follows 4-vector addition.
Newton is just beyond comparison
Science has been perfected.From the perspective of quatum mechanics,Einstein was right.Newton's classic mechanics could not be explained
Does it make any difference?
Perfect
Cool. Who's the lady host? God bless, Proverbs 31
I know almost nothing about physics, but I'm sure when Neil was asked who was right, Einstein or Newton, he said "Tyson, yes, Tyson is always right"... Then he held his hands like Mr. Burns and called everyone in the room idiots for not being him.
100% of physics and maths of engineering is classical mechanical of NEWTON.
Relativity’s theory is used with big things like stars, great speeds, etc.
From my research on gravity it seems to me that there are TWO kinds of acceleration. One kind is real, meaning if there is a force on an object then it will be considered to be accelerating, and it will have weight. The other kind is an illusion, or an apparent acceleration. If you have weight, but feel as though you're standing still, then objects that are actually standing still will seem as if they are accelerating instead of you. Anytime an object has weight there will be a force on it, whether or not the object is observed to be accelerating, traveling at a constant speed, or standing still. Anytime an object does not have weight then there will not be a force on it, whether or not the object is observed to be accelerating, travelling at a constant speed, or standing still. Apparent acceleration can also mean an object has real acceleration but is actually standing more still than you. Or in other words it will have less force on it than you. My research also seems to indicate that the idea of apparent acceleration is not taught in schools. According to Einstein, to stand still with a static weight, you are accelerating up from a force at 9.8 meters/sec/sec. Less force upward less acceleration, and you will be falling with apparent acceleration, with a lighter than static weight. Free fall, would be no upward force, you are then weightless with an apparent downward acceleration at 9.8 meters/sec/sec.
Brian Greene tells Alan Alda there is no gravity in free fall.
NIST WTC FAQ 31 "the upper section came down essentially in free fall."
Shyam Sunder John Gross "gravity was the driving force."
th-cam.com/video/E43-CfukEgs/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/XRr1kaXKBsU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/MxE8N5IAFWg/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/GuLL_upE4zk/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/_GjIgJPn47E/w-d-xo.html
Emergent science produced emergent gravity and emergent space,... To correct problems of gravity over very long distances.
Tyson Loves to talk and make grand statements, no one disagrees on climate changing. The question is the impact man has and can he control it without killing off 7 or 8 billion?
MrYort13 he gets a wonderful high from the emotion he feels when he hears the echo of his great voice the man's a great orator & he loves to have an audience he's well respected but his ego is getting out of control he needs meditation ASAP
And how do you know that he does not meditate?
6:03 what did she say "planet to warm?
Nothing worse than a fact that isn't true.
jocal17 wanna backup your claim?
I was just making fun of Harvinder. I'm usually don't care about seemingly simple language mistakes but I found this one quite idiotic. But not as bad as yours. At least I know what he meant. I don't even know if you intended there to be a question mark after 'say'.
jocal17 glad to know u don't deny the fact about climate change. But what fun did u make of harvinder 😄
a 'fact' is true by defintion.
Donde esta la "fuerza"de gravedad que no la veo?
Force g = G Mm/R².
@@solapowsj25donde esta perceptualmente?
(6:00) So, when we don't find any strings nor 10 new dimensions at the fundamental level ... String Theory still won't be considered "wrong?"
Neil goes on awesome Newton vs. Einstein rant... then NY times lady throws in some global warming talking point at the end. So lame lol
Love how he always says "now watch this" he's not even showing you anything he's telling you haha dk why it makes me laugh
Both are right. Newton talks of G and the force of gravity on mass in free space. Einstein introduced the concept of curvature of the fabric of 4-D spacetime. He predicted the black hole formed when and where gravity causes nuclear changes in the fifth dimension.
Vulcan: Mercury's miscarried little brother
Where is his tie?
"No you're a fan" lmao
I didn't know Neil lost his feet. When did he lose it?
When is this guy gonna run for president already!
i'm advocating for a house of scientists (as opposed to a house of lords - what do they know) on this side of the pond, maybe the US could do the same.
Aww struck with the explanation given
“I was reading Schopenhauer last night, and I decided: Schopenhauer was right “ 🎶
She got them to agree on the global warming and he immediately backtracked and corrected his statement. It's not that there isn't global warming, it's not that humans haven't aided in global warming. It's the amount and the overall effect and impact it will have is contested
Contested by whom? 100% of the scientific organizations that have put out an official statement on this topic agree that 1) the planet is warming and 2) the primary driver of this warming is human activity. Here is the list: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),
Federal Climate Change Science Program (US),
Arctic Climate Impact Assessment,
European Academy of Sciences and Arts,
InterAcademy Council,
International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences,
Network of African Science Academies,
Royal Society of New Zealand,
American Association for the Advancement of Science,
European Science Foundation,
National Research Council (US),
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians,
American Society for Microbiology,
Australian Coral Reef Society,
Institute of Biology (UK),
Society of American Foresters,
The Wildlife Society (international),
American Geophysical Union,
Canadian Federation of Earth Sciences,
European Federation of Geologists,
European Geosciences Union,
Geological Society of America,
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics,
Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society of London.
American College of Preventive Medicine,
American Medical Association,
American Public Health Association,
Australian Medical Association,
World Federation of Public Health Associations,
American Meteorological Society,
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society,
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences,
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society,
Royal Meteorological Society (UK),
World Meteorological Organization,
American Quaternary Association,
International Union for Quaternary Research,
American Astronomical Society,
American Chemical Society,
American Institute of Physics,
American Physical Society,
American Statistical Association,
Engineers Australia (The Institution of Engineers Australia)
The fact that humans were able to predict the existence and location of Neptune from Newton's calculations, is a testament of his genius. Meanwhile 400 years later we still have people swearing by god that they don't think, they KNOW that the Earth is flat.
Lot of people in the comment section writing about Newton and Einstein, but I’m watching Neil and the host. I do believe the host was smitten ❤😊 by Mr. De Grasse! Judging from the “laws of attraction” that have nothing to do with the universal constant of gravity, she was blushing 😊, laughing flirtatiously, etc. I’m surprised she didn’t fix (play) with her hair!
Einstein just told what is written in the Vedas --that energy and matter is inter convertible.
You make me want to be a scientist sir.
All models are wrong, but some are useful - George Box
ahhhh....my daily dose of sunshine
How about Miss Known Universe?
How about Tyson vs Tyson?