Bro have you started the NCA process yet? I should get my assessment by January, would love to connect and hopefully get some pointers for the exam. God Bless.
Hi Prof, The Enacting Clause of the BNA/ Constitution Act of 1867 was repealed in 1893 by Q Viicoria. Re 1982, I believe there is a "Subject to" Clause in the Royal Proclamation that has not been lifted.
The Patriation of the Constitution was not the signing of the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Constitution Act, 1982. The Queen signed into law the Canada Act. The Canada Act, a United Kingdom statute, created the latter as a constitutional document that recognized the former as part of the Constitution along with other constitutional documents and the unwritten Constitution.
The Quebec government was the only provincial government that did not agree to the repatriation of the Constitution in 1982 (ie Constitution Acts 1867 and 1982). Meech and Charlottetown were both failed attempts to amend the Constitution in order to bring Quebec into the constitutional fold.
Territorial governments are creations of the federal Parliament, not the Constitution. Under federal legislation such as the Northwest Territories Act, territorial governments make law using powers delegated to them by the federal Parliament.
As of June 9 2021, Rocco Galati Constitutional Lawyer was able to get the Canadian Emergency Covid Restrictions revoked by the High Court of Canada. No more lockdowns masks or injections they are unlawful. Follow Roccogalati on Twitter or utube or bitchute.
BC was added to the Dominion of Canada in 1871 by order of the Queen under the British Columbia Terms of Union. That order made BC a province of Canada under the consitution which, at that time, was the British North America Act. (See www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/bctu.html.)
The CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 is a flawed document. The very first line of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states" Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law". The issue is that it assumes a fact not in evidence - the existence of a God. This would make the first statement inadmissible in any court of competent jurisdiction. Secondly, there is no specificity as to which God the framers had in mind - there are many throughout history. How does one rationally formulate a legal description or interpretation of a deity?
So a plea to all Canadians ,,,,,you guys were more than happy to be independent of the English government Why would you then not fully support Scotland doing the same The Monarchy is a completely separate issue Republic or monarchist is not an issue at the present time and it will be up the the majority of Scottish residents to decide which one we adopt
![ALLY - OH MY! [ REACTION ] 'Amarin Nitibhon' #ALLY_OHMY #ALLY #allynitibhon #แอลลี่](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nX9qpHjVfbQ/mqdefault.jpg)
God bless you I'm currently a law student outside of canada willing to study in canada and your videos are amazing! Thank you so much
Bro have you started the NCA process yet? I should get my assessment by January, would love to connect and hopefully get some pointers for the exam. God Bless.
SAME
Hi Prof,
The Enacting Clause of the BNA/ Constitution Act of 1867 was repealed in 1893 by Q Viicoria.
Re 1982, I believe there is a "Subject to" Clause in the Royal Proclamation that has not been lifted.
The Patriation of the Constitution was not the signing of the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Constitution Act, 1982. The Queen signed into law the Canada Act. The Canada Act, a United Kingdom statute, created the latter as a constitutional document that recognized the former as part of the Constitution along with other constitutional documents and the unwritten Constitution.
Canada is a puppet state
useful for indian students who are studying law clerk and paralegal in canada or master of laws
Really useful thank you! Is there a follow up to explain what happened during the Meech and Charlottetown accords?
The Quebec government was the only provincial government that did not agree to the repatriation of the Constitution in 1982 (ie Constitution Acts 1867 and 1982). Meech and Charlottetown were both failed attempts to amend the Constitution in order to bring Quebec into the constitutional fold.
Very helpful you are teaching is best .
The Interpretation Act 1889(UK) clearly states Canada is a British Colony.
How is Canada's constitution legal when Quebec NEVER SIGNED UP??
love the depth of the breakdown! everyone should see this playlist! 🤍🤍💯💯🍁🍁
Continual ACT and Charter of Right's...breaking them a BREACHES or Contempt of a Court order???
Both??
Why've you stopped posting?
So do the Territories have no voting power in this instance?
Territorial governments are creations of the federal Parliament, not the Constitution. Under federal legislation such as the Northwest Territories Act, territorial governments make law using powers delegated to them by the federal Parliament.
We were Dominions, not colonies. Joesph Howe, was looking at Nova Scotia not joining.
Good video. Im curious about how the emergency precision and legislation works as in regards to the constitution or the Charter?
As of June 9 2021, Rocco Galati Constitutional Lawyer was able to get the Canadian Emergency Covid Restrictions revoked by the High Court of Canada. No more lockdowns masks or injections they are unlawful. Follow Roccogalati on Twitter or utube or bitchute.
@@cristafasano4654 do you have an official source of the ruling?
@@Optimistprime. try looking at Rocco Galati@roccogalatilaw on twitter
@@Optimistprime. I received this info through bitchute from David Avocodo Wolfe. Hope that was helpful.
@@Optimistprime. Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act 264/21 revoked June 9 2021
So how did British Columbia come to be? its not an original wasn't even mentioned
BC was added to the Dominion of Canada in 1871 by order of the Queen under the British Columbia Terms of Union. That order made BC a province of Canada under the consitution which, at that time, was the British North America Act. (See www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/bctu.html.)
Amend the constitution Independency of Canada 2021
Lol
The CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 is a flawed document. The very first line of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states" Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law". The issue is that it assumes a fact not in evidence - the existence of a God. This would make the first statement inadmissible in any court of competent jurisdiction. Secondly, there is no specificity as to which God the framers had in mind - there are many throughout history. How does one rationally formulate a legal description or interpretation of a deity?
Stop watching American TH-cam Canadian laws are different. And it's your Charter of Rights and Freedoms not your Constitution
So a plea to all Canadians ,,,,,you guys were more than happy to be independent of the English government
Why would you then not fully support Scotland doing the same
The Monarchy is a completely separate issue
Republic or monarchist is not an issue at the present time and it will be up the the majority of Scottish residents to decide which one we adopt