As a berber i have always been amused by the fact arabs rave about israélienne imperialism wall never reflecting on the fact there guilty of the same thing an far larger scale
The entire reason that there are Arabs in the Land of Israel is due to the Rashidun Caliphate declaring it their own on the basis of a single myth. It doesn't mean they have to leave, but it does absolutely mean that they need to realize the land they are on belongs intrinsically to another people.
@@jacobweinstein9136 the rashiduns did not even bother to justify there conquest and hey that’s ok it’s not like anyone is going to cry about the poor romans but if arabs think it’s fine to conquer other peoples land then they should not cry about it when someone does it to them
@@maxs.5112 no we are not a minority generally speaking the ethnic arabs of North Africa are a very small minority most of the actual fighting is amongst berbers and berbers claiming to be arabic or who indentifie as arabs
@@xvct2661 If you do not mind, may I know what country you are from? Also when you say fighting amongst berbers and berbers claiming tone arabic, is there a identity crisis or culture clash that these countries face?
Wrong... what was in 1995 after Oslo accord is an office of communication to facilitate jewish moroccan visiting Morocco.. King Hassan clearely said to israeli television that this office has no diplomatic nature or can be promoted as a recognation ...and still now the office resumed its operation and it has no diplomatic criteria there is no embassy of israel in morocco
@@ShubhamMishrabro Not in Arab league countries... except Egypt until 1995. Qatar never recognized Israel and the Maldives had diplomatic relations since the 60's
@@wiseguy1582 "The two countries established low-level diplomatic relations during the 1990s following Israel's interim peace accords with the Palestinian Authority. "
As Israeli *and* history nerd I was actually not aware of some major points. * How much of the groundwork for the agreement was laid during the Rabin government. * The treaty was actually signed while we already were at war in lebanon. I wasn't clear about the chronology. * The whole issue of Palestinian autonomy and the pressure on Sadat to get some concessions on the Palestinian subject. The main problem with Israeli popular memory is that it's still too dominated by contemporary publicism and partisan neratives rather actual historiography.
Thank you for taking the time to research and produce this video, which accurately and fairly portrays the history of the conflict. I wish more well meaning people could see this. But in truth, the really well meaning ones seek it out. Others just believe what they want to believe
Jimmy Carter, one of the few presidents I actually liked. He was a great guy, but was President at the wrong time. He wasn't prepared to deal with the Washington DC. I also like Ronald Reagan as well too. He was an effective leader and had the right advisors to deal with DC. CARTER did really well after his Presidency. Great guy. Sad to hear Jimmy Carter is now in hospice care.
He's a good example of a great man but a poor politician. He was hated by may Democratic politicians of his time since there used to be liberal and conservative factions in both parties even though now a majority of Democrats are liberals and a majority of Republicans are conservative, and the liberal Democrat faction were mainly aligned with Kennedy. Kennedy wanted Carter to play the standard political games, which Carter generally wouldnt, and he opposed Carter since Carter was more conservative than Kennedy. A big reason why Reagan, originally more of a political outsider and dark horse, won over incumbent Carter (especially after the then recent Watergate scandal) was because the vote was split as the pro Kennedy and pro Carter factions bickered. I know it would never have happened but I always thought that the perfect presidential team would be if Reagan worked with Carter. Carter had a strong moral code and care a lot about the common man, arguably more so than any president since but he wouldnt play the political games necessary to make it in DC and his moral sometimes prevented him from doing the best course of action since sometimes you have to make cold rational decisions that are unethical. Reagan meanwhile could be TOO willing to play political games, people who knew him and his wife said they were progressive for the time when it came to gay people and had many gay friends (not surprising from a couple from Hollywood) but they were never publicly in favor of gay rights and let the AIDS crisis go on for too long unadressed since it was associated with gay men at the time. Reagan was however great at getting things done, he had more support from Democrats than most Republicans and was more popular with Democrat voters than most Republicans, he was also able to get even his enemies on board (just look at Iran-Contra). Carter would do well providing the "angel on the shoulder" for Reagan and work towards getting the economic success of the 80s to benefit the working class as well as the rich while Reagan could carry out the conflicts with the Soviets and other American enemies.
@@shelysheli1Yes, but Carter was working to limit death, unlike most Presidents who only cared about defending oil or not caring at all about civilians.
Thanks to HelloFresh for sponsoring today's video. Go to strms.net/CasualHistorianHelloFreshOctoberYT and use code POGHF6493 for 65% off plus free shipping on your first box!
Thank you for your very detailed accurate videos. :) *I was so happy when the Camp David Accords were anounced! Also, when the more recent* *accords were completed.* The people of these countries do not need to have their tax money used for military purposes. Also, the wealthier Arab countries will be able to afford to send more aid other Arabs and Muslims in various countries, who are experiencing tough times due to the ongoing (10-year+ !!!) drought[1] and the fallout from various (imo: stupid) wars. _______________________________________________________________ 1.) The entire Mediterranean basin, the entire Middle East, the Sahel and the Horn of Africa have endured a food-destroying drought. Some areas of South Asia as well as areas of China and North America (Canada, Mexico, US) also are enduring an ongoing drought. Every few thousand years North America gets a devastating drought in what is called the Midwest of the USA (the drought extends into the Canadian plains and into most of northern Mexico) The drought cycle in California is due to the El-Nino/La-Nina cycles An earlier devastating drought destroyed the cultures of the Cliff Dwellers and the Mound Builder societies in USA as well as at least one pre-Aztec society in Mexico. I don't know much about drought cycles in other areas of the world. I do know that about 15,000 years ago the entire Sahara desert was a lush grassland much like the Sahel was before the most recent drought.
In WW2, Europe exterminated 6M civilian Jews, That is a real tragedy Since 1947 have died 19,231 Palestineans fighting Jews or were killed by their own and 24,068 Jews died fighting and in terrorist attacks. So since 1947 43,299 Jews and Palestineans died fighting. The Holocaust was committed between the beginning of 1942 to April 1945. So 3 years and 4 months which is 3*30+356*3=1158 days, 6,000,000/1158 days = 5181. Meaning that EUROPE was busy killing Jews in each DAY more than Jews and Palestineans died in 1947,
@@SUomiist you're wrong. there is wikipedia page that meticulously counts every israeli causality since 1 March 1920 and the total israeli deaths that can be attributed to its neighbors from what i remember is around 19,000 dead. for palestine that number is around 35,000 palestinians killed by Israel and for egypt around 34,000 egyptians killed by israel. as for the holocaust, jews were not the only victims in that.
@@zombieat Source, Trust me bro. 🤣 As of Yom HaZikaron, 2021, the official IDF figure for the number of Israelis who have fallen in defense of Israel is 23,928. Actually, the number of Palestineans killed is much bigger than that if counted killed by themselves or killed by other Arabs, Jordan alone in 1970 killed 25,000 Palestineans, I care about other Arabs killed out of greed or the lust for genocide as I cared for ISIS killed after genociding and raping Yazidis
Probably because it was a very minor incident in the grand scheme of things which didn't have any major geopolitical impact and the only people who pretend to care about it are disingenuous basement nazis who in any other situation would be cheering the deaths of American servicemen. Friendly fire incidents and cases of mistaken identity happen when you have fog of war, what happened with USS Liberty is regrettable but it isn't proof some nefarious Israeli plot against the US as basement nazis would have us believe. By that logic, the numerous incidents of USAF aircraft accidentally attacking British tanks means that the United States is secretly plotting to destroy England.
@@CasualHistorian Thanks, but are you sure you have the link out? I am having trouble with everything blending in with sources, Support channel, Buy my book, and etc.
I hope we can one day get some settlement that will work for both parties but honestly the Israelis have little choice in the matter. Palestinians have always been more closely aligned with Iran than the Jews and Arabs as a whole have treated Jews worse across the last 1400 years than the Jews have treated the Palestinians in the last 70. Not to mention the fact that the West Bank cuts right into the heart of Israel and holding it provides Israel with much needed geographical security making invasions more difficult, which for a tiny country with few geographical defenses surrounded by enemies who outnumber them roughly 40 to 1 is a sorely needed. It's also easy for many people in the modern day to forget that until recently much of the Muslim world simply didnt acknowledge that a Jewish state had any right to exist and that the Jews should remain a scattered people and second class citizens even in their own homeland.
Carter’s disastrous Middle East foreign policy is something my people are still suffering from, 44 years later. *Millions* of us have been slaughtered as a result. My only comfort is knowing that the Iranian people are ending this fascist terrorist Islamist genocidal regime ourselves - a regime helped into power by none other than the worst foreign policy president in American history, Jimmy Carter.
How is it that the US is to blame for Irans regime when the US has opposed the regime since day one, regime that is fundamentally opposed to the US from any perspective and who has fought the US on a few occasions and who the US tried to both keep from taking power and tried to remove from power? The regime remains in power largely thanks to their control of the Iranian oil/gas industry, their alliance with Russia, and their control of both the military and control over paramilitaries like Basij. The regime gained power thanks to popular support in the country and general opposition to the west and the US and that popular support remained fairly high since the country was and still is extremely conservative if not reactionary by western standards
Yeah but Muslims don't live in the past. We live in a post Muhammad world where Muhammad is the last and final Prophet sent to all of mankind. If Zionism had any merit with Muslims you would have seen Caliph Umar give the land to the Jews to govern or something but we don't see that in the history books.
You say “the first Jews in Palestine were migrants from Europe.” But where did those Jews in Europe come from? Do they have heritage to the same area and then they went to Europe and back? If not how did Judaism spread to europe? It’s generally a heredity religion and one we agree originated in the holy land. Is this history lost or something? How do the Jews get to Europe
The Camp David Accords and the 1979 Peace Treaty have held up, so far. I have high hopes for the Abraham Accords. The Oslo Accords turned out to be a failure.
I don't think any US Statesman was more stylish than Gerald Ford .. Nobody could rock a pinstriped like him. Plus he was the last serving US President to have been an active WW2 Veteran - Carter was still in Naval Academy when peace was declared, an experience from which he extracted questionable benefit..
Salam, Shalom, Peace. Surely The Israeli's & Palestinian's Must Be Worn Out Of Hatred & Constant Warfare, There Must Be A Better Solution, For The Two Nations To Thrive. Israel Can Survive Next To Palestine And Vice Versa, Sow The Seeds Of Peace And Compromise.
abraham accords are good. But ultimately why should most Americans care? With all the problems that have been facing the USA for years now why should Americans still be so concerned/involved with the middle east politics!?
@@NEAZ24 or creates future hitlers? Look how many dictators America has installed or supports! Washington was right when he warned that the USA shouldn't involve itself in the affairs of other countries.
@@NEAZ24 America got involved in ww2 at the end of 1941! After several years of the war going on. Also if the ruropeans just stopped hitler in the 1930's then the whole thing could have been avoided! But doing the right thing takes courage, something they lacked!
@@NEAZ24 America isn't a democracy so how can it spread democracy abroad if it doesn't exist at home? Certain foreign policies have lead to brutal dictatorships around the world, installed by and supported by America. Millions of jews and other peoples could have been saved if a few leaders dared to do the right thing in the 1930's. Also America was one of the countries that turned jews away in the 30's when they were fleeing nazi persecution! Japan was "saved" after it was destroyed, although they started the war. South Korea was saved. But was Vietnam "saved" or Cambodia and Laos? Their are times to intervene, like ww2 or rwanda. then their are situations that just fuck everything up, like Iraq!
The video is not accurate, thier were always Jews in Israel as part of (HA YESHUV HAYASHAN). Jews also migrated to Israel during the Ottoman period and were the majority of the residence of Jerusalem in servy done by the Brits in 1914. Jews were murdered and dispaced from thier redency in Israel during the Arabs riouts in 1929 and between 1936 - 1939, among these places were Jews living in Gaza, Nabls and Hebron.
Jews were less than 10% of the population in the late ottoman period and in the 30s/40s they got to around 40%. I Dont think this rise is population would've been destructive however it came paired with the popular idea of creating a Jewish state within palestine (which was obviously against the wishes of the majority Arab population) with the backing of the British colonial power. This is what caused the tension in palestine and all the atrocities you mentioned
@@BartholomewConstantine Any resources to support that? Brits put limitations on Jewd migration to Israel from the begginnig of the 1930, most jews migrated vial sea which could be governd. No one put any limitations on Arab migration nor governd it. All Arab migrated via land. Bottom line if we go back to the point of 1937 the Phil committee Jews where 40% of the population and were whilling to compromise on 18% of the land. Arabs (leadership, st the time were by the Hudenies) were not whilling to compromise than (and also not now) more then that they wanted to forcly expelled the jews from Israel later on cooporated with Hitler and the Natzis. Pruve me wrong if you can, i will be happy to know more.
@@brittennz if you go to Wikipedia and search palestine population by year you can see in 1890 the Jewish population was roughly 8% (this is estimated but its the best we have) and this is about 8 years after the start of the zionism movement. All the tensions between Jews and Arabs started post ww1 post balfour declaration where Jews were now perceived as a settler colonial people. Jews migrating to the middle east/ North Africa to escape intolerance in Europe is nothing new its happend many times however those time the sovereignty of the Muslim countries were secure. This time palestine was a British mandate and had no sovereignty so zionism was a legitimate threat to them. Even the Zionists themselves marketed the movement as colonisation with organisations like the Jewish colonisation association. Zionism aims to create a European style nation state in the middle east for Jews the same way the French have France. The issue is that 99% of France is French and in 1947 only 40% (at best, post migrations) of palestine was Jewish
The spirit of zionism was for Jews to have a safe place away from European intolerance which was completely possible if mandatory palestine was covered into a secular state the same way the other countries divided in the sykes picot treaty were (except Jordan). The settler colonial element of zionism is the fundamental problem with it and is what caused the tensions and wars etc
I think it's messed up how the Palestinians lost their homes n land .... But I'm american n if my country says so then I go with what my country says n support Israel fully .. sorry USA#1
just to correct you here the jewish weren t expelled from west bank after 1948 war , there are jewish palestinians living in nablus for centuries they weren t expelled , they refused to live in israel and they have representative in the palestinian parliment , and there weren t any jewish in gaza strip to begin with , the jewish were expelled only from east jereuslem because guess what they killed and evacuated palestinians from west jereuslem to begin with ,also not all arab countries expelled jewish in fact morocco didn t and the mussad had later in 1963 to sign a secret deal with hassan the second to move jewish from morocco to israel voluntarily also in Iraq in 1945 there were a massacre against jewish that appeared later, israels did to encourage iraqi jewish to move to the new state , you are too biased in your videos
You're talking about Samaritans. They've been separated from Jews longer than Christians. There were Jewish communities in the WB and they were all ethnically cleansed of Jews.
This guy's channel is underrated. I hope the algorithm gives him a boost.
I always say with these high tier content long format to section the video. Makes everything well set on a timeline.
As a berber i have always been amused by the fact arabs rave about israélienne imperialism wall never reflecting on the fact there guilty of the same thing an far larger scale
The entire reason that there are Arabs in the Land of Israel is due to the Rashidun Caliphate declaring it their own on the basis of a single myth. It doesn't mean they have to leave, but it does absolutely mean that they need to realize the land they are on belongs intrinsically to another people.
Whats it like to be a Berber in a North African country? If I am not mistake, Berbers are generally the minority.
What is life, and society like?
@@jacobweinstein9136 the rashiduns did not even bother to justify there conquest and hey that’s ok it’s not like anyone is going to cry about the poor romans but if arabs think it’s fine to conquer other peoples land then they should not cry about it when someone does it to them
@@maxs.5112 no we are not a minority generally speaking the ethnic arabs of North Africa are a very small minority most of the actual fighting is amongst berbers and berbers claiming to be arabic or who indentifie as arabs
@@xvct2661 If you do not mind, may I know what country you are from?
Also when you say fighting amongst berbers and berbers claiming tone arabic, is there a identity crisis or culture clash that these countries face?
Morocco already recognized Israel in 1995. In 2000 Morocco withdrawed the embassies, and returned it in 2021.
Yeah many countries recognise Israel they just don't have a diplomatic relations with them like Maldives and qatar
And who was President in 2021, Biden, right?
Wrong... what was in 1995 after Oslo accord is an office of communication to facilitate jewish moroccan visiting Morocco.. King Hassan clearely said to israeli television that this office has no diplomatic nature or can be promoted as a recognation ...and still now the office resumed its operation and it has no diplomatic criteria there is no embassy of israel in morocco
@@ShubhamMishrabro
Not in Arab league countries... except Egypt until 1995. Qatar never recognized Israel and the Maldives had diplomatic relations since the 60's
@@wiseguy1582
"The two countries established low-level diplomatic relations during the 1990s following Israel's interim peace accords with the Palestinian Authority. "
27:42
Absolutely not only European Jews, but also Iranian, Bukharan and especially Yemeny Jews as well.
Outstanding review of thre camp david years! Truly!!
As Israeli *and* history nerd I was actually not aware of some major points.
* How much of the groundwork for the agreement was laid during the Rabin government.
* The treaty was actually signed while we already were at war in lebanon. I wasn't clear about the chronology.
* The whole issue of Palestinian autonomy and the pressure on Sadat to get some concessions on the Palestinian subject.
The main problem with Israeli popular memory is that it's still too dominated by contemporary publicism and partisan neratives rather actual historiography.
So instructive. Thank you.
Thank you for taking the time to research and produce this video, which accurately and fairly portrays the history of the conflict. I wish more well meaning people could see this. But in truth, the really well meaning ones seek it out. Others just believe what they want to believe
Jimmy Carter, one of the few presidents I actually liked. He was a great guy, but was President at the wrong time. He wasn't prepared to deal with the Washington DC.
I also like Ronald Reagan as well too. He was an effective leader and had the right advisors to deal with DC.
CARTER did really well after his Presidency. Great guy. Sad to hear Jimmy Carter is now in hospice care.
He's a good example of a great man but a poor politician. He was hated by may Democratic politicians of his time since there used to be liberal and conservative factions in both parties even though now a majority of Democrats are liberals and a majority of Republicans are conservative, and the liberal Democrat faction were mainly aligned with Kennedy. Kennedy wanted Carter to play the standard political games, which Carter generally wouldnt, and he opposed Carter since Carter was more conservative than Kennedy. A big reason why Reagan, originally more of a political outsider and dark horse, won over incumbent Carter (especially after the then recent Watergate scandal) was because the vote was split as the pro Kennedy and pro Carter factions bickered.
I know it would never have happened but I always thought that the perfect presidential team would be if Reagan worked with Carter. Carter had a strong moral code and care a lot about the common man, arguably more so than any president since but he wouldnt play the political games necessary to make it in DC and his moral sometimes prevented him from doing the best course of action since sometimes you have to make cold rational decisions that are unethical. Reagan meanwhile could be TOO willing to play political games, people who knew him and his wife said they were progressive for the time when it came to gay people and had many gay friends (not surprising from a couple from Hollywood) but they were never publicly in favor of gay rights and let the AIDS crisis go on for too long unadressed since it was associated with gay men at the time. Reagan was however great at getting things done, he had more support from Democrats than most Republicans and was more popular with Democrat voters than most Republicans, he was also able to get even his enemies on board (just look at Iran-Contra). Carter would do well providing the "angel on the shoulder" for Reagan and work towards getting the economic success of the 80s to benefit the working class as well as the rich while Reagan could carry out the conflicts with the Soviets and other American enemies.
As an Iranian seeing someone actually like Carter rather than wishing him death triggers extreme anger. He caused so much pain and suffering.
@@shelysheli1Yes, but Carter was working to limit death, unlike most Presidents who only cared about defending oil or not caring at all about civilians.
@@shelysheli1what exactly did Carter do that you have such an issue with
My man has been lifting.
Let’s go!
you've been getting killed by the algorithm
Rabin and Begin are the most based Israeli prime ministers of all time.
I believe that, in your comment, you're trying to say "biased". Yet your English is still quite good for a foreign speaker.
@@DanWotanBarrett Nah he made perfect sense, based is a modern slang word
I would only place Levy Eshkol above them but otherwise absolutely!
Thanks to HelloFresh for sponsoring today's video. Go to strms.net/CasualHistorianHelloFreshOctoberYT and use code POGHF6493 for 65% off plus free shipping on your first box!
Great video, incredibly eye-opening!
Thank you for your very detailed accurate videos. :)
*I was so happy when the Camp David Accords were anounced! Also, when the more recent*
*accords were completed.*
The people of these countries do not need to have their tax money used for military purposes.
Also, the wealthier Arab countries will be able to afford to send more aid other Arabs and
Muslims in various countries, who are experiencing tough times due to the ongoing
(10-year+ !!!) drought[1] and the fallout from various (imo: stupid) wars.
_______________________________________________________________
1.) The entire Mediterranean basin, the entire Middle East, the Sahel and the Horn of Africa
have endured a food-destroying drought. Some areas of South Asia as well as areas of
China and North America (Canada, Mexico, US) also are enduring an ongoing drought.
Every few thousand years North America gets a devastating drought in what is called
the Midwest of the USA (the drought extends into the Canadian plains and into most
of northern Mexico) The drought cycle in California is due to the El-Nino/La-Nina cycles
An earlier devastating drought destroyed the cultures of the Cliff Dwellers and the
Mound Builder societies in USA as well as at least one pre-Aztec society in Mexico.
I don't know much about drought cycles in other areas of the world. I do know that
about 15,000 years ago the entire Sahara desert was a lush grassland much like
the Sahel was before the most recent drought.
Great video , learned so much from your video
What a tragedy this conflict...
thank you for your videos
In WW2, Europe exterminated 6M civilian Jews, That is a real tragedy Since 1947 have died 19,231 Palestineans fighting Jews or were killed by their own and 24,068 Jews died fighting and in terrorist attacks.
So since 1947 43,299 Jews and Palestineans died fighting.
The Holocaust was committed between the beginning of 1942 to April 1945. So 3 years and 4 months which is 3*30+356*3=1158 days, 6,000,000/1158 days = 5181.
Meaning that EUROPE was busy killing Jews in each DAY more than Jews and Palestineans died in 1947,
@@SUomiist you're wrong. there is wikipedia page that meticulously counts every israeli causality since 1 March 1920 and the total israeli deaths that can be attributed to its neighbors from what i remember is around 19,000 dead. for palestine that number is around 35,000 palestinians killed by Israel and for egypt around 34,000 egyptians killed by israel. as for the holocaust, jews were not the only victims in that.
@@zombieat Source, Trust me bro. 🤣
As of Yom HaZikaron, 2021, the official IDF figure for the number of Israelis who have fallen in defense of Israel is 23,928.
Actually, the number of Palestineans killed is much bigger than that if counted killed by themselves or killed by other Arabs, Jordan alone in 1970 killed 25,000 Palestineans,
I care about other Arabs killed out of greed or the lust for genocide as I cared for ISIS killed after genociding and raping Yazidis
Patterson will pay !!!
Thanks!
Man I miss Menachem begin
Thank you so much for your hard work!
Keep it coming
Awesome video.
Just saying you should definitely make a t shirt of that Sherman meme going "don't make me come down there again"
Why did you skip over the USS Liberty incident .
Probably because it was a very minor incident in the grand scheme of things which didn't have any major geopolitical impact and the only people who pretend to care about it are disingenuous basement nazis who in any other situation would be cheering the deaths of American servicemen. Friendly fire incidents and cases of mistaken identity happen when you have fog of war, what happened with USS Liberty is regrettable but it isn't proof some nefarious Israeli plot against the US as basement nazis would have us believe. By that logic, the numerous incidents of USAF aircraft accidentally attacking British tanks means that the United States is secretly plotting to destroy England.
Why though?
Real Talk
Where is the link to the survey?
Check the description
@@CasualHistorian Thanks, but are you sure you have the link out? I am having trouble with everything blending in with sources, Support channel, Buy my book, and etc.
@@maxs.5112 It is the second link
@@porkchopproductions0314 Found it! Thank you.
@@maxs.5112 No problem!
awww those poor settlers had to move from the land they occupied how sad for them
Good job man very good
I am 100% on team Israel on these issues. I’m glad the Israelis were stubborn.
I hope we can one day get some settlement that will work for both parties but honestly the Israelis have little choice in the matter. Palestinians have always been more closely aligned with Iran than the Jews and Arabs as a whole have treated Jews worse across the last 1400 years than the Jews have treated the Palestinians in the last 70. Not to mention the fact that the West Bank cuts right into the heart of Israel and holding it provides Israel with much needed geographical security making invasions more difficult, which for a tiny country with few geographical defenses surrounded by enemies who outnumber them roughly 40 to 1 is a sorely needed. It's also easy for many people in the modern day to forget that until recently much of the Muslim world simply didnt acknowledge that a Jewish state had any right to exist and that the Jews should remain a scattered people and second class citizens even in their own homeland.
Carter’s disastrous Middle East foreign policy is something my people are still suffering from, 44 years later. *Millions* of us have been slaughtered as a result.
My only comfort is knowing that the Iranian people are ending this fascist terrorist Islamist genocidal regime ourselves - a regime helped into power by none other than the worst foreign policy president in American history, Jimmy Carter.
How is it that the US is to blame for Irans regime when the US has opposed the regime since day one, regime that is fundamentally opposed to the US from any perspective and who has fought the US on a few occasions and who the US tried to both keep from taking power and tried to remove from power? The regime remains in power largely thanks to their control of the Iranian oil/gas industry, their alliance with Russia, and their control of both the military and control over paramilitaries like Basij. The regime gained power thanks to popular support in the country and general opposition to the west and the US and that popular support remained fairly high since the country was and still is extremely conservative if not reactionary by western standards
Carter did enable the Ayotollah, which he now knows was a mistake, though he actually gave the Shah asylum.
Iran is still the same lol, camp David worked not oslo
What is the background music at 1:30
Do one about Trinidad and Tobago 🇹🇹
the quran itself says "allah" gave the land to Moses and his people
Yeah but Muslims don't live in the past. We live in a post Muhammad world where Muhammad is the last and final Prophet sent to all of mankind. If Zionism had any merit with Muslims you would have seen Caliph Umar give the land to the Jews to govern or something but we don't see that in the history books.
@@محمدالامريكي-ج9م LOL if ANYONE lives in the past it's Muslims hahahahahahahahaha
well the Book of Joshua and the Bible mention the the Pentapolis of the Philistines. so give it to them.
@@zombieat a) the philistines no longer exist
B) God ordained the land for the jews in part because of the philistines and their sin
@@itsa-itsagames Fuck the old testament God that ordained that some people should be punished because of their supposed "sins"..
i thought this would have 8 million views atleast, wtf..
You say “the first Jews in Palestine were migrants from Europe.” But where did those Jews in Europe come from? Do they have heritage to the same area and then they went to Europe and back? If not how did Judaism spread to europe? It’s generally a heredity religion and one we agree originated in the holy land. Is this history lost or something? How do the Jews get to Europe
Jews migrated to Europe from the Levant during the Hellenist period.
There r a lot of basic things u didn't put a light on about Camp David
8:30 svelte bruh
The Camp David Accords and the 1979 Peace Treaty have held up, so far. I have high hopes for the Abraham Accords. The Oslo Accords turned out to be a failure.
Abraham Accords were odd considering Israel and the UAE get along okay. The deal should have been between Syria and Israel or Iran and Israel.
The problem is Iran and Syria are not willing to make peace with Israel.
@@easyenetwork2023that's never going to happen until a regime change
I don't think any US Statesman was more stylish than Gerald Ford .. Nobody could rock a pinstriped like him. Plus he was the last serving US President to have been an active WW2 Veteran - Carter was still in Naval Academy when peace was declared, an experience from which he extracted questionable benefit..
George H. W. Bush : "Am I a joke to you?"
No, Carter also helped prevent a major nuclear disaster in Canada.
Salam, Shalom, Peace.
Surely The Israeli's & Palestinian's Must Be Worn Out Of Hatred & Constant Warfare, There Must Be A Better Solution, For The Two Nations To Thrive.
Israel Can Survive Next To Palestine And Vice Versa, Sow The Seeds Of Peace And Compromise.
abraham accords are good. But ultimately why should most Americans care? With all the problems that have been facing the USA for years now why should Americans still be so concerned/involved with the middle east politics!?
@@NEAZ24 less involvement would be better! Less involvement less fuck ups.
@@NEAZ24 or creates future hitlers? Look how many dictators America has installed or supports! Washington was right when he warned that the USA shouldn't involve itself in the affairs of other countries.
@@NEAZ24 America got involved in ww2 at the end of 1941! After several years of the war going on. Also if the ruropeans just stopped hitler in the 1930's then the whole thing could have been avoided! But doing the right thing takes courage, something they lacked!
@@NEAZ24 when you giving military aid, what do you mean involvement?
@@NEAZ24 America isn't a democracy so how can it spread democracy abroad if it doesn't exist at home? Certain foreign policies have lead to brutal dictatorships around the world, installed by and supported by America. Millions of jews and other peoples could have been saved if a few leaders dared to do the right thing in the 1930's. Also America was one of the countries that turned jews away in the 30's when they were fleeing nazi persecution! Japan was "saved" after it was destroyed, although they started the war. South Korea was saved. But was Vietnam "saved" or Cambodia and Laos? Their are times to intervene, like ww2 or rwanda. then their are situations that just fuck everything up, like Iraq!
NWO
As an Egyptian i feal ashamed of my country, one day we will free egypt and decolonise all arab lands.
Free Egypt from Arab colonialism? I think it's a bit too late for that.
The video is not accurate, thier were always Jews in Israel as part of (HA YESHUV HAYASHAN). Jews also migrated to Israel during the Ottoman period and were the majority of the residence of Jerusalem in servy done by the Brits in 1914. Jews were murdered and dispaced from thier redency in Israel during the Arabs riouts in 1929 and between 1936 - 1939, among these places were Jews living in Gaza, Nabls and Hebron.
Jews were less than 10% of the population in the late ottoman period and in the 30s/40s they got to around 40%. I Dont think this rise is population would've been destructive however it came paired with the popular idea of creating a Jewish state within palestine (which was obviously against the wishes of the majority Arab population) with the backing of the British colonial power. This is what caused the tension in palestine and all the atrocities you mentioned
@@BartholomewConstantine Any resources to support that? Brits put limitations on Jewd migration to Israel from the begginnig of the 1930, most jews migrated vial sea which could be governd. No one put any limitations on Arab migration nor governd it. All Arab migrated via land.
Bottom line if we go back to the point of 1937 the Phil committee Jews where 40% of the population and were whilling to compromise on 18% of the land. Arabs (leadership, st the time were by the Hudenies) were not whilling to compromise than (and also not now) more then that they wanted to forcly expelled the jews from Israel later on cooporated with Hitler and the Natzis. Pruve me wrong if you can, i will be happy to know more.
@@brittennz if you go to Wikipedia and search palestine population by year you can see in 1890 the Jewish population was roughly 8% (this is estimated but its the best we have) and this is about 8 years after the start of the zionism movement. All the tensions between Jews and Arabs started post ww1 post balfour declaration where Jews were now perceived as a settler colonial people. Jews migrating to the middle east/ North Africa to escape intolerance in Europe is nothing new its happend many times however those time the sovereignty of the Muslim countries were secure. This time palestine was a British mandate and had no sovereignty so zionism was a legitimate threat to them. Even the Zionists themselves marketed the movement as colonisation with organisations like the Jewish colonisation association. Zionism aims to create a European style nation state in the middle east for Jews the same way the French have France. The issue is that 99% of France is French and in 1947 only 40% (at best, post migrations) of palestine was Jewish
The spirit of zionism was for Jews to have a safe place away from European intolerance which was completely possible if mandatory palestine was covered into a secular state the same way the other countries divided in the sykes picot treaty were (except Jordan). The settler colonial element of zionism is the fundamental problem with it and is what caused the tensions and wars etc
@@brittennz I'm not arab/Palestinian but if I was I'd love Jewish migration into palestine they're great
Cope and seethe Arabs. Come take our holy land.
Do you play among us
No
I think it's messed up how the Palestinians lost their homes n land .... But I'm american n if my country says so then I go with what my country says n support Israel fully .. sorry USA#1
I think it's messed up how native Americans lost not only an entire continent, but countless of lives and entire civilizations.
@@tFighterPilotskill issue
just to correct you here the jewish weren t expelled from west bank after 1948 war , there are jewish palestinians living in nablus for centuries they weren t expelled , they refused to live in israel and they have representative in the palestinian parliment , and there weren t any jewish in gaza strip to begin with , the jewish were expelled only from east jereuslem because guess what they killed and evacuated palestinians from west jereuslem to begin with ,also not all arab countries expelled jewish in fact morocco didn t and the mussad had later in 1963 to sign a secret deal with hassan the second to move jewish from morocco to israel voluntarily also in Iraq in 1945 there were a massacre against jewish that appeared later, israels did to encourage iraqi jewish to move to the new state , you are too biased in your videos
You're talking about Samaritans. They've been separated from Jews longer than Christians. There were Jewish communities in the WB and they were all ethnically cleansed of Jews.
30:00
tactical comment
Two state solution is anti-Palestinian
No
@@mirrored464 yes, it is a two state solution is anti-Palestinian