Nice, I imagine this aligns with the upcoming Bricks components. I hope we can incorporate in-place editing. The user accessibility of this feature within Bricks is debatable, as it may require user access to Bricks, but it remains beneficial for general building. I would opt to retain the user in Gutenberg or utilize AT to streamline the interface.
We are currently using a fourth-party plugin on top of third-party plugins. I appreciate that this is being made available, but eventually, these elements need to be integrated into Bricks Core (or even WordPress Core). Components, frameworks, and client editing (or exporting as Gutenberg blocks). I am pleased that all these integrations exist at the moment and shine a light on the possibilities of modern development.
Yeah, I'm curious about the final native Bricks component would be like too. I'm not a very big fan of Bricks inline editing, I feel Gutenberg does a lot better with inline editing. If we let clients use JetEngine components in Bricks, we might need Bricksforge or AT to hide other elements. I like the fact that we can make a Jet Engine component in one builder and use it in any other. That's where it differs from Gutenbricks.
@daveden2 Yes, an interesting approach. I still have a license from back in the day. I should dust it off and experiment with it. It's a great feature even without considering clients. It adheres to the Don't Repeat Yourself principles, allowing you to construct your entire project using components. This way, a complex build can be easily updated, even with ID styles since there aren't many locations to update. Integration with global CSS or a framework further simplifies the process.
I agree. All of these separate parts can simply become one big integrated builder. Have you had a chance to test out the WordPress Patterns override in WP 6.6?
I am using CrocoBlock products for a few years now, and they are excellent. Bricks is planning to launch components very soon, I wonder how these will work?😅
Yes, I am excitedly waiting to see the Bricks native version as well! However, I suppose one difference would be that the Bricks components would likely only function within Bricks. You may not be able to use them easily in Gutenberg.
This is a great feature from the Crocoblock team, who are known for their innovative solutions. However, I believe Advanced Themer offers similar functionality with extensive controls and features we need. Nonetheless, it’s fantastic that we’re getting this in JetEngine, which means we’re not limited to just Bricks. What are your thoughts?
Yes, Advanced Themer does have the Strict Editor View, which is excellent. I think Jet Engine's components differ in that: ● All sub-elements (heading, image, etc.) are packaged as a single component. ● You can restrict the HTML tags that editors can access in the component (h2, h3, p). AT would only allow you to disable the entire heading tag control. ● The component works in both Gutenberg and Bricks. I believe both plugins can work seamlessly together to improve the editor experience.
Do you know if it's possible to change the order within the "Listing Grid" widget from JetEngine while using Bricks builder? I am not able to change the default order. Thanks a lot!
@@daveden2 hello. I have a radio type field in jet form builder. I have dynamically brought a cpt into this field and given it a custom template (listing item). I need to show it in the slider form. Can I do it with component?
@@anthonyespino7214 no, a component would not help in this case. A component simply converts a group of elements into a template. But with the ability to change the text content per instance.
Yes, I eagerly await the native Bricks components feature. But I sense one difference: the Bricks component would probably only work within Bricks, while JetEngine works in Gutenberg as well.
Thank you very much for this excellent video tutorial. So well done! So informative! Looking forward to watching more of your productions.
Thank you! If you have any requests, feel free to let me know.
Thank you Daveden. Your Clips are so helpful for me know.
I'm happy to hear that!!
excellent video. very good tutorial, very technical 👏
Thanks!!
Nice, I imagine this aligns with the upcoming Bricks components. I hope we can incorporate in-place editing. The user accessibility of this feature within Bricks is debatable, as it may require user access to Bricks, but it remains beneficial for general building. I would opt to retain the user in Gutenberg or utilize AT to streamline the interface.
We are currently using a fourth-party plugin on top of third-party plugins. I appreciate that this is being made available, but eventually, these elements need to be integrated into Bricks Core (or even WordPress Core). Components, frameworks, and client editing (or exporting as Gutenberg blocks). I am pleased that all these integrations exist at the moment and shine a light on the possibilities of modern development.
Yeah, I'm curious about the final native Bricks component would be like too. I'm not a very big fan of Bricks inline editing, I feel Gutenberg does a lot better with inline editing.
If we let clients use JetEngine components in Bricks, we might need Bricksforge or AT to hide other elements.
I like the fact that we can make a Jet Engine component in one builder and use it in any other. That's where it differs from Gutenbricks.
@daveden2 Yes, an interesting approach. I still have a license from back in the day. I should dust it off and experiment with it. It's a great feature even without considering clients. It adheres to the Don't Repeat Yourself principles, allowing you to construct your entire project using components. This way, a complex build can be easily updated, even with ID styles since there aren't many locations to update. Integration with global CSS or a framework further simplifies the process.
I agree. All of these separate parts can simply become one big integrated builder.
Have you had a chance to test out the WordPress Patterns override in WP 6.6?
I am using CrocoBlock products for a few years now, and they are excellent.
Bricks is planning to launch components very soon, I wonder how these will work?😅
Yes, I am excitedly waiting to see the Bricks native version as well!
However, I suppose one difference would be that the Bricks components would likely only function within Bricks. You may not be able to use them easily in Gutenberg.
Great video, thanks.
To use it or not, I am waiting to see the brick's native component.
Agreed 💯 I can't wait to see what Bricks comes up with
This is a great feature from the Crocoblock team, who are known for their innovative solutions. However, I believe Advanced Themer offers similar functionality with extensive controls and features we need. Nonetheless, it’s fantastic that we’re getting this in JetEngine, which means we’re not limited to just Bricks. What are your thoughts?
Yes, Advanced Themer does have the Strict Editor View, which is excellent.
I think Jet Engine's components differ in that:
● All sub-elements (heading, image, etc.) are packaged as a single component.
● You can restrict the HTML tags that editors can access in the component (h2, h3, p). AT would only allow you to disable the entire heading tag control.
● The component works in both Gutenberg and Bricks.
I believe both plugins can work seamlessly together to improve the editor experience.
Do you know if it's possible to change the order within the "Listing Grid" widget from JetEngine while using Bricks builder? I am not able to change the default order. Thanks a lot!
I'll take a look.
Did you add the order in the Query Builder?
Hello, can I put a slider and then show it in a jet form builder field, bringing the post source and custom template?
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question. Could you explain a bit further?
@@daveden2 hello. I have a radio type field in jet form builder. I have dynamically brought a cpt into this field and given it a custom template (listing item). I need to show it in the slider form. Can I do it with component?
@@anthonyespino7214 no, a component would not help in this case. A component simply converts a group of elements into a template. But with the ability to change the text content per instance.
Isnt Bricks going to be building this component functionality into Bricks Builder natively, making using JetEngine not necessary?
Yes, I eagerly await the native Bricks components feature.
But I sense one difference: the Bricks component would probably only work within Bricks, while JetEngine works in Gutenberg as well.
Do you think you'll use components in your workflow?
Not sure yet I still feel a bit insecure to use it, but this video helped a lot.
@@edywerder, yeah, I feel they still need to work on a few bugs
Compared to ACPT, this is very complicated.
Does ACPT have components? I need to take a closer look at it.
Doesn't have components, but the UI, easy understanding without the need for tutorials is commendable. Yes jetengine is more powerful. @@daveden2
Yeah, JetEngine should update their UI to a more modern look.