Nah, I watched yesterday and felt exactly the same. Also no one's saying Nolan did a bad job, just that it was good/solid, but not as amazing as expected.
@@PedroTorres-ky2yxIt’s a historical movie plus idk how someone can watch this movie and say Oppenheimer was a bad or immoral egotistical dude. Oppenheimer never had an ego.
He's bang on about his analysis of the bomb scene - contrast of celebratory yet eerie. The movie was never meant to be about the making of the bomb - it's about what the making of the bomb does to the person who made it. No one with no ego makes it, yet no one with sound judgement does (hence the Germans going after it) - I felt that was beautifully explored in the film and you felt a sense of genuine conflict. If you study history, you realise there are no good people - it's like Warhammer.
"Hollywood is so unoriginal but doing lame pranks on youtube or producing incredibly shallow conversations on a podcast is the mark of something groundbreaking." I mean, Hollywood has never been unoriginal really but it's not whatever these two are doing requires much skill or talent. Also, there's a whole world of international/arthouse cinema these guys won't touch.
honestly after seeing Oppenheimer at first i was like it was alright but rethinking it, it was an amazing movie. such beautiful shots and a great way to tell the story
That's not enough to make a movie great, the characters were flat and robotic. Actors were great but the characters weren't written anything like real people
As someone who like science and history and politics and cinema and music, Oppenheimer is my favorite film of all time. The first 2 hours and 15 min felt like an hour. The last 45 min felt like 1.5 hour. Already watched 2 times, both on the best seat, IMAX 70mm and digital IMAX. I will watch it again when IMAX 70mm is not fully packed. Oppenheimer felt like a piece of real memory.
Agreed his style of film making was perfect for this type of subject matter. I feel if anyone else but Nolan made this film it would of been mundane. He really knows how to make any situation impactful.
It’s Nolan “Masterpiece”? Bro what? Freaking Inception and The Prestige is a way better movie then Oppenheimer 🤦🏾♂️. I swear every time a major movie comes out from a good director you guys are like “this sh*t is a masterpiece” smh🙄. I can just tell you guys are not a Nolan fan but are just generic fans of movies
@@intello8953nah it’s not. This movie trumps inception although not by a lot. Inception explored perception of reality and the dream within a dream concept but the acting was worse. This movie just explored deeper philosophical questions and the acting was overall better. They’re both great movies though
@@kartinmarl.7804nah, first its an opinion so who cares. Also, yeah the movie after the bomb went of dragged for so long with RDJ’s character. I liked the movie, but wouldn’t watch it again. And Barbie had good jokes but overall terrible 🗿
The problem with people seeing Oppenheimer is that they expect to be entertained, as if it was an action-packed blockbuster (that’s how I went into it). But the fact is, it’s a complex character study about a man who’s faced with a huge moral dilemma and how he deals with that. That’s what the film does best. It’s absolutely not for everyone but I think part of the negative criticism of the film is that people expect it to be something that it’s not.
The thing with Oppenheimer - I thought it was a 8/10 watching it - but I spent the whole next day thinking about it, government, the military industrial complex, etc. (yeah it may sound corny - but the film makes you think.) Which is why I think it is a crowning achievement - It's not the most entertaining film, but it makes you feel something.
The whole point of the of Barbie is the inverse of the "morale" you thought it was. It's satire on how women get so few seats in congress, so similarly Kens are only in the beginning stages of their rights.
I feel like to fully appreciate Oppenheimer you have to have some knowledge of the physics behind it. Seeing all of the famous physicists who’s equations you use almost every day of your life gave the movie more depth and caused me to be truly excited throughout.
I also feel like you need to know more about history. Why in the scene where they get the reports that the Germans are closer to a reactor and not a bomb was because heisenberg and others were deliberately sabotaging the project. Or why we actually dropped the bomb on Japan. Sure we could’ve won without it but the Japanese are on record that they would never have stopped and made it a war of attrition. This isn’t a patriotic film it’s a biopic depicting the events around oppi and the knowledge he held . Imo the message of the movie is to be wary of a nuclear war and to not use those weapons lightly because you can legitimately set the atmosphere on fire
If you have some knowledge about the topic, you would enjoy it more for sure. Like when Oppenheimer found out that splitting the atom was possible. I understand how important it was and it's more impactful for me.
Bro that made me hate the scientists even more 🤦🏾♂️😂. “Wow we found a way to split the atom…………… let’s make a weapon out of this to kill other human beings” not a good look. But I do understand learning the science behind it is amazing
@@intello8953 Unfortunately the world is not a friendly place at the highest levels. Having stronger weapons than your enemy is incredibly important. It is sad but that's reality.
Oppenheimer has already made more than twice it’s budget worldwide and it’s going to be in theaters for 100 days, longest time in like 10 years. It’s gunna crush everything
It’s in the top 5 Movies for me. But it’s not for everyone and it’s not a perfect movie. If you’re not into philosophical thought provoking movies and ur not looking at interesting cinematic shots then it’s not for you
If you really know about the story of Barbie you would know that the original creator of the doll Barbie is Ruth Marianna Handler the wife of one of the co-founders of Mattel Elliot Handler. The original doll was named Bild Lilli doll. Which was based off a old comic that portrayed a blond promiscuous woman who was not afraid to use men to her advantage. Mattel later bought the rights to the doll and Redesigned it to be Barbie. The doll was named after Ruth's daughter Barbara and then the made the ken doll and named it after her son Kenneth. Now to the movie which if you've seen it you can clearly see there are hidden messages and imagery. That being said in the beginning it has little girls discovering barbie in a reference to a movie called 2001 A Space Odyssey it, it shows them happily destroy their boring and oppressive baby dolls in violence and destruction. An obvious visual metaphor of little girls destroying the embodiment of motherhood to focus their lives instead on a shallow materialistic piece of consumerist trash and if this is lost on any of you people to realize then you guys are basically their target audience for this movie. The movie is basically about Barbie living in a fantasy land called Barbie land a place portrayed as a peaceful feminist utopia where all the important jobs are done by the Barbies and the kens just exist and give no inherent value, that they contribute nothing that they have no power or say in how their society is run and they're basically looked down on as silly and irrelevant by the Barbies.
I considered that to be the message of the film, but considering the hyper-modern-feminist director and Mattel's oversight, it seems unlikely that they were intentionally criticizing Barbie's influence as a product. Though, obviously I'd love for what you're saying to be true.
Thank u. I am a woman but will not go c that bashing on men n making them look stupid. N kinda erasing family life. But that what feminist do. I had a hard working dad n amazing mom who was there everday caring for us a job in itself. The movie makes me sick to my stomach.
Timestamps: 00:00 - The video expresses a negative sentiment towards the lack of originality in Hollywood and the current state of the entertainment industry. 00:03 - The video discusses a scene from a Barbie movie that surprises the speaker with its moral message. 00:35 - The video describes a scenario in the Barbie movie where Barbie and Ken are depicted in different worlds, highlighting the influence of the patriarchal system. 01:06 - The video suggests a scenario in Barbie land where Barbies emotionally manipulate individuals, causing conflicts and manipulations among them. 01:40 - The video discusses a scene involving a bomb explosion and questions the necessity of atomic bombs in war. 02:27 - The video discusses a movie scene where a military base is pitted against a town, creating confusion and ambiguity. 03:35 - The video expresses mixed opinions about various movies and characters, including admiration for filmmaker Christopher Nolan and disappointment at the absence of a Batman trilogy from him. 04:11 - The video emphasizes the significance of creating immersive and identity-driven experiences for fans and discusses the marketing strategy employed by a particular movie. 04:49 - The video describes the author's experience at a movie theater and comments on the effectiveness of the marketing strategy for a specific movie. 05:27 - The video discusses the perception and reception of the movie Barbie, including the expectation of numerical scores and the verification process for audience ratings. 06:30 - The video discusses a movie scene involving Ryan Gosling's performance and expresses admiration for his humor and comedic timing. 07:04 - The video mentions conservatives' reactions to the movie Barbie and speculates about their concerns regarding its influence on children. 07:43 - The video discusses jokes in movies, the cultural relevance of toys like Barbie and Super Mario, and the popularity of dressing up for Star Wars events. 08:11 - The video discusses the movie Brothers, including positive reviews and the speaker's personal enjoyment of it. 09:10 - The video mentions the movie Oppenheimer and the absence of likable characters in it, highlighting the involvement of individuals associated with creating nuclear weapons. 09:43 - The video presents fragmented thoughts and opinions about Oppenheimer, expressing a critical perspective on his actions and beliefs. 10:14 - The video features a casual conversation discussing various topics, including communism, nuclear weapons, Russia, Russian women, and actress Margot Robbie. We've crafted timestamps to help you time! Show your support by subscribing to this video and our channel. If you'd like to go the additional mile, you can buy us a coffee at besaw.me/thanks Your generosity means everything to us! ☕ Donators can have access to our Facebook Group, learn top-income strategies, and test apps like the instant chatbot creator below. Unlock the full potential of ChatGPT-4's advanced features for your chatbot projects! Bypass the normal restrictions after signing up for our free trial - only email is needed. Experience the magic now at: besaw.me/trial Video Description: The video discussed in this conversation covers various topics, including movies, characters, and cultural references. It begins with expressing a negative sentiment towards the lack of originality in Hollywood and the current state of the entertainment industry. The conversation then delves into a discussion about a scene from a Barbie movie that surprises the speaker with its moral message. It describes a scenario in the movie where Barbie and Ken are depicted in different worlds, highlighting the influence of the patriarchal system. The conversation suggests a scenario in Barbie land where Barbies emotionally manipulate individuals, causing conflicts and manipulations among them. It further discusses a scene involving a bomb explosion and questions the necessity of atomic bombs in war. The video also touches on a movie scene where a military base is pitted against a town, creating confusion and ambiguity. Mixed opinions about various movies and characters are expressed, including admiration for filmmaker Christopher Nolan and disappointment at the absence of a Batman trilogy from him. The significance of creating immersive and identity-driven experiences for fans is emphasized, along with discussions about marketing strategies employed in movies. The video describes the author's experience at a movie theater and comments on the effectiveness of the marketing strategy for a specific movie. It also discusses the perception and reception of the movie Barbie, including the expectation of numerical scores and the verification process for audience ratings. The conversation covers a movie scene involving Ryan Gosling's performance, conservatives' reactions to the movie Barbie, jokes in movies, the cultural relevance of toys like Barbie and Super Mario, and the popularity of dressing up for Star Wars events. The video mentions the movie Brothers, positive reviews, and personal enjoyment of it. It also discusses the movie Oppenheimer and the absence of likable characters in it, highlighting the involvement of individuals associated with creating nuclear weapons. Fragmented thoughts and opinions about Oppenheimer are presented, expressing a critical perspective on his actions and beliefs. The conversation concludes with a casual discussion about various topics, including communism, nuclear weapons, Russia, Russian women, and actress Margot Robbie.
OPP was a 3 hr movie... for the sheer length, it kept me engaged; which says alot; for a movie that long.. And the ending scene. Or the revelation about what Einstein actually said. Nice bow on the whole thing
More indictive of his retarded mental state. I don't mean that as a throwaway slur. His mental state is literally held back if he cannot appreciate the greater context and history of this film
expecting anything batman from oppenheimer is the most ridiculous thing. i loved it. its about the then current political climate, the heavy decision making between whats right from wrong, from the personal, professional, social, and political level. it was meant to put us there in the shoes of everyone and feel it deeply, very anxiety inducing and amazingly done. expectations are the biggest enemy of pleasure. I'm always excited for a nolan movie but i can't compare movies directly because they're usually different. his movies are his children in a way and i woundnt compare my children. sure its not for every one, but the right mindset and context can put you off
I don't understand how someone can't see the beauty of Oppenheimer. This movie is a complete cinematic experience. Tension, great dillema, complex characters, amazing cinematography, visuel storytelling at it's best, the sound editing and soundtrack is INSANE. Saying you went to that movie expecting "The Batman trilogy" experience is one dumb way to anticipate a biopic movie about an historical figure and invention.
I understand the Barbieland parts of the movie were used as an engine for satire, but it's not satire to beat the drums of "The real world is a horribly oppressive patriarchy." They believe that, and they don't sugarcoat it. It's in every atom of feminist art. Barbie gets ogled, cat-called, and sexually assaulted within 5 seconds of being in LA. Mattel is run by evil patriarchs even though the real Mattel has always been largely ran by women. All men are depicted as absent-minded, stupid, manipulative, evil.
@@SenorzilchnzeroThey are talking about Barbie, it was a satire on gender roles. They changed Barbieland so Kens could have more influence on the territory. I think they are saying that people are seeing Barbie on a surface level.
His perception isnt the only thing going down. It seems like alot of these "professional" comedians, their standup is weak! Rogan is weak, Andrew, Tom just took a dive imo, Bert was NEVER funny (he just laughs at his own jokes) and dont get me started on female comics. The only pro comedian who is still funny is C.K.
Not a flawless movie at all but still incredible. Id say pulp fiction is close to a flawless movie but this movie still beats pulp fiction for me despite imperfections
Precisely. Japan was not surrendering short of a complete occupation of their land. The casualties required for that invasion would have been astronomical for both sides. Also, for anyone wondering about the need to stand up to Japanese imperialism in the Pacific and South East Asia, Japan exterminated somewhere between 3-30 million people during their occupation. To cry about 100 000-200 000 Japanese deaths without considering the horror they inflicted on others is disingenuous
@@intello8953 Wasn't a big enough Military target to demonstrate the bomb's power. This is a well known and documented discussion if you study history. They also mention it in passing in the film The military dictatorship of Japan had done a fantastic job of creating a cult of personality around the Japanese Emperor, even though they controlled him. You can see the utter devotion of Japanese soldiers to their country's cause demonstrated by the existence of kamikaze pilots, the culture of Sepukku and the fact that whole platoons did not surrender at the end of the war and carried on fighting in certain places. The Americans understood Japan's desire to fight to the bitter end, a fact many are forgetting to history in their quest to be nice rather than objective. They knew nothing short of a completely successful invasion and take-over of Japan would end the war. The cost of securing this objective would have been utterly devastating in terms of casualties to both sides. It would have also been a very protracted phase of the war. The Japanese civilian populace would have fought a guerilla war on the next level (Emperor worship, remember?). The sheer efficiency of the nuclear bombings demonstrated clearly to the Japanese the stakes of continuing the war and thank God, for the sake of the Japanese people, they made the right decision in surrendering. It was also the right decision for the Americans because of the lives saved on their side. The action also saved Japanese lives because an invasion would have been far more devastating. Which is why America would also have been justified to keep on bombing Japan. I will also add context to the historical situation. Enola Gay dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima on the evening of the 6th of August 1945. This was announced by President Truman the next morning, the 7th of August. The Japanese had two days to surrender but did not. The bombing of Nagasaki followed on the 9th. This further demonstrates Japan's unwillingness to surrender. It was not a fog of war situation. Eyewitness accounts in Japan document that the Japanese realization of a single, city destroying bomb was, within minutes, shortly after the bombing and even before Truman's announcement the next day. This demonstrates the cost of prolonging the war far outweighed the cost of the bomb. In my mind, it was a small price to pay based on the havoc Japan inflicted on South-East Asia and the Pacific in the form of 'the Asian Holocaust'. By which they killed an estimated 30 million people in those countries. We need to study history to ensure we do not repeat the mistakes of the past. We have had relative peace following WWII thanks to nuclear weaponry. History teaches us the path to peace is deterrence and the path to war is diplomacy. I pray America has been using her superior military spending to develop her best weapons even further and as strongly as possible. There are too many bad actors in this world who would curtail the relative freedom that Pax Americana has bestowed on the West. I also hope more countries such as Ukraine and those held in the bondage of Eastern suspicion and superstition can experience it. This will only happen if America can demonstrate further supremacy. Especially in areas of powerful weaponry
@@mjz667 so because there was a “cult following” and not enough “military target” that killing civilians was rational? When Americans and the British *the Soviets is a different thing* that killing is ok now? I hate hypocrisy so much maybe that’s why I’m confused by this whole thing. But thank God I wasn’t in that position Edit: also America has used its military horrendously around the world and became a Neo Empire 🤷🏾♂️
Saw Oppenheimer opening day on 70mm and thought it was just alright. They speed run through so many things certain events are awkward (like a scene with his newborn) and most people aren’t fleshed out. You need to provide the context to give the movie meaning
"There is not one good character in the movie" has gotta be the most wack take ive ever heard. Oppenheimer is fantastic. EDIT: I realize he’s talking about character morality but dude still made wack takes 😂
I think the fundamental point that Schulz is missing, and it’s not to his fault, that you need to be educated to appreciate this film. Not everyone has the aptitude for science and grounded films. At the end of the day, Schulz is a comic from the superhero fandom generation, and that’s how his expectations from every film is.
I personally liked Barbie. I didn't take any of it serious - and therefore I found the entire thing funny because it was all satire. Some messaging wasn't for me, but it wasn't meant to be lol. If the mere idea that patriarchy may exist offends you, then don't watch this movie. Jidion missed the point as to why Kens don't have power (satire). In fact, it was explicitly expressed that the barbies were treating the kens as women are treated in the real world. It was definitely an eye for eye makes the world makes the world blind - type of position. It wasn't a - the world is better when women run shit- it was an eye for an eye. If you don't think you are gonna like Barbie cause of the things you are hearing because it is woke or whatever, do yourself a favor and don't watch it lol. EDIT: I should have been more explicit about "real world". In their universe they have two worlds: Barbie world and the real world. not literally our world lmfao. The real world is an exaggeration/satire on our world and some parts are fictitious, e.g., they have a portal to the barbie world in their "real world"🤣
If you really know about the story of Barbie you would know that the original creator of the doll Barbie is Ruth Marianna Handler the wife of one of the co-founders of Mattel Elliot Handler. The original doll was named Bild Lilli doll. Which was based off a old comic that portrayed a blond promiscuous woman who was not afraid to use men to her advantage. Mattel later bought the rights to the doll and resigned it to be Barbie. The doll was named after Ruth's daughter Barbara and then the made the ken doll and named it after her son Kenneth. Now to the movie which if you've seen it you can clearly see there are hidden messages and imagery. That being said in the beginning it has little girls discovering barbie in a reference to a movie called 2001 A Space Odyssey it, it shows them happily destroy their boring and oppressive baby dolls in violence and destruction. An obvious visual metaphor of little girls destroying the embodiment of motherhood to focus their lives instead on a shallow materialistic piece of consumerist trash and if this is lost on any of you people to realize then you guys are basically their target audience for this movie. The movie is basically about Barbie living in a fantasy land called Barbie land a place portrayed as a peaceful feminist utopia where all the important jobs are done by the Barbies and the kens just exist and give no inherent value, that they contribute nothing that they have no power or say in how their society is run and they're basically looked down on as silly and irrelevant by the Barbies.
@@tobaccoffee506 fixed my post. I can see how people can be easily confused when I say "real world" despite it being in the context of the movie's plot.
Jidion couldn't even properly say what happened at the end of the movie and completely missed the mark with his take. Also, seems like he didn't get the message of the movie. While it was heavily politicized, the point of the movie wasn't "screw all men". It's funny that Barbieland was trying to be a mirror of the real world (but with women in power), and some men got super offended by it. Very ironic.
I enjoyed watching Oppenheimer, but I think for those who didn't enjoy the film as much was because of how the movie was promoted. In short, if you are into history you will love this film, if you are expecting shit to blow up every 15 minutes because it's a Nolan film, then you will be disappointed. **Small Spoilers ahead** It was promoted as if the movie was going to be about the Atomic bomb and the world causes and consequences of creating it (I also thought it would be about this). Half of the movie is about how Oppenheimer ended up leading a group of scientists to create the bomb but in actuality the movie is about Oppenheimer trying to keep his government security clearance. As one of my friend's put it "there was too much diologue". The film does take some time to show Oppenheimer's regrets once it's created. It also shows his regrets before it was created but he only agreed to do it because the Nazi's were already working on it and it was seen as "It's best if we have it before them".
You include the Hiroshima nuke scene and the movie is 10/10. I understand why they didn’t show it.. because it’s all Oppenheimers pov. It’s his story. But still. I wanted more scale from the nuke scene. The score was intense asf tho
It’s one of those movies that make you think beyond the movie, not surface level stuff. Plus Andrew saying all the characters were not “good” people just shows he never understood the movie.
Damn I really understood Oppenheimer different from Schulz. I didn’t think Oppenheimer was portrayed as a piece of shit more just as a flawed person who tried to do what he thought was best for the world, especially since it was wartime. The most POS thing he did in that movie was probably cheat on his wife but everyone back then cheated on their wife anyway
My take away of Oppenheimer wasnt that he was a “piece of shit person” and i didnt think everyone in the movie were bad ppl. Had a way different perspective than andrew
This man completely missed the point of the film. Never was it said or alluded to, that men don’t deserve no rights. Ken needed to find value and a purpose for himself rather than looking for it in Barbie. Oppenheimer was absolutely incredible. Schulz meant there wasn’t any good hearted people not that characters were badly performing or written, which I mostly agree. RDJ and Nolan perfectly portrayed a spiteful, delusional and narcissistic man in Lewis Strauss. Nolan and Murphy beautifully depicted the shifts In Oppenheimer from a restless genius level student to a gifted physicist, to the eager head of the Manhattan project to an old man plagued by the guilt of his choices. Throughout the movie there is the dread that is culminates by the end of the film, the vision of the planet destroyed by the weapons Oppenheimer unleashed in the world.
my daughters r in college so i have no reason to see the movie but to be fair the barbie doll universe always made ken a side character with really no development
Barbie was the biggest bait and switch I've seen in while. Barbie suffers from the feminist paradox. Oppenheimer is for people who had some knowledge of Science and Politics. Its not as good as Interstellar or Dark Knight.
I can relate with Andrew when he is saying that Christopher Nolan is the greatest director alive. Sometimes I am so emotional and passionate talking with someone about his movies that I almost cry 😅😅😅
I feel like I’m the only one that understands this movie. The Kens and their revolution are an allegory for modern feminism that in some instances has gone too far. They aren’t given what they want at the end of the movie because just because you were oppressed, doesn’t mean that the answer is to completely upend the structure of society. That is a criticism of modern feminism. And by the way. Our main Barbie CHOOSES TO LEAVE BARBIELAND.
Technically speaking, Oppenheimer was brilliant, but it fell short in the storytelling and the emotional aspects of a true masterpiece. I think Nolan could've focused less on the pace and theatrics of it and explored more of Oppenheimer's inner conflict of developing the bomb and the emotional struggle from the accusations of him being a communist. He was clearly the protagonist and rightfully so, but Nolan overall fell short of having the audience fully root for Oppenheimer and pity him for wrongfully being a target of the US, despite being a loyal patriot.
There's no argument that didn't need to happen and I'll explain why. When the bombs were dropped Japan surrendered 3 weeks later. The reason they surrendered so quickly is because USA lied an said they had more bombs to drop of them. Which in turn saved alot of American and allied troops. I'm sorry but it's war and you're supposed to do whats best for your side to stop the blood shed. That's why it had to happen. Otherwise would of gone on for month's even years if the emperor wouldn't surrender.
I'm planning to smoke a lot before I go see Barbie. I wanna be stoned af. I think I'll really enjoy it like that. Otherwise I'm not wasting my time. Christopher's movie is definitely something I wanna go see.
Im guessing people expected Oppenheimer to be a action pack movie, li everyone expected the latest Batman movie to be a action packed! Nigguh Batman is a mf detective 😂
Only 3 things I didn't like about Oppenheimer: The nuke scene was silent at explosion, like an anti-climax. Also didn't show the 2 bombs on Japan. And last hour of movie was commie bullshit.
Both movies were told exactly how they were meant to be told. Barbie for me is inconsistent especially if it’s supposed to be “woke”. Literally no one cared about Allen, the only unique person there. All that movie proved was equality is not the goal for feminism. Oppenheimer was probably too realistic and that’s what made it so uncomfortable. Everyone sucked morally, and no one cared. They used and abused each other then celebrated their selves. I’d call it the problem of human nature. Because every human is capable of doing what they did in principle.
I used to love this pod but Akaash’s takes are so terrible that they drive me away from the pod, Alex too, but I’m not going to be talking about Alex on this one. In recent events, this has been Akaash’s stance: Men who are upset at the Barbie movie are automatically conservative and it’s “gay” to care about Barbie. First, your leftist allies would call you sexist with that position. Next, people don’t care about the movie, people are outraged about the terrible script and the messaging conveyed - especially to little kids. Akaash then denies that it was being marketed to young girls. You don’t think women will take their daughters to a Barbie movie? Also, if it wasn’t marketed as a movie for kids, tell me what the age rating is then… I’ll wait. About two weeks ago, or whenever the Jonah Hill situation was happening, leave it to Akaash to side with the leftist agenda. “Jonah Hill is insecure”, and most men - actual men that have been with more than one woman - saw those messages, knew it was for clout, and actually sided with Jonah because his boundaries were reasonably set. I had a post before stating how the Flagrant crew went left-leaning all of a sudden, maybe it was always that way and I didn’t notice it earlier or my observation is right.
That is the whole point, dude, the famous Oppenheimer line ..I become death the destroyer of words , the dude feel like shit after make the bomb... one Andrew sounds like smart asf the next one like a dork. Haha, the dude is confusing ..
Funny how they missed the obvious joke about the barbie movie. Where we see the Barbie’s treat the guys like shit is just a direct representation of how women are treated in today’s world. Lmao
"Hearing this, His Majesty stated that the advent of the new weapon like the atomic bomb made it impossible to continue the persecution of war and steps should be taken to end the war without delay." August 8th, 1945 Gaimusho (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) ed. Shusen Shiroku (The Historical Records of the End of the War), annotated by Jun Eto, volume 4, 57-60 [Excerpts] [Translation by Toshihiro Higuchi]
It's scary how that dude brought up politics in a movie review. American filmmaking has become so political and divisive, no child should be indoctrinated by some creepy Hollywood executives
jeeez did andrew even watch the movie, what is he talking about ?!? Clearly his ADHD brain was in the barbie land, you gotta watch Oppenheimer again my dude, you really missed the plot if that is your takeaway.
Andrew went into Oppenheimer expecting a batman movie 😂
All of these guys are mentally challenged.
Christopher Nolan did an awesome job with Oppenheimer, Andrew, you're off on that critique.
Nah, I watched yesterday and felt exactly the same. Also no one's saying Nolan did a bad job, just that it was good/solid, but not as amazing as expected.
@@PedroTorres-ky2yxIt’s a historical movie plus idk how someone can watch this movie and say Oppenheimer was a bad or immoral egotistical dude. Oppenheimer never had an ego.
@@Dawg476 ok, then. Agree to disagree.
He's bang on about his analysis of the bomb scene - contrast of celebratory yet eerie.
The movie was never meant to be about the making of the bomb - it's about what the making of the bomb does to the person who made it. No one with no ego makes it, yet no one with sound judgement does (hence the Germans going after it) - I felt that was beautifully explored in the film and you felt a sense of genuine conflict.
If you study history, you realise there are no good people - it's like Warhammer.
@@PedroTorres-ky2yxI thought it was amazing
Never underestimate Schulz & his clown posse’s ability to have the wrong take on just about any issue possible.
Jidion isn't right either this is the most dumb conversation about Barbie I ever seen
Another grown man puking out "like" six times per sentence.
What lame hater takes on their takes
The guy is an absolute tart.
"Hollywood is so unoriginal but doing lame pranks on youtube or producing incredibly shallow conversations on a podcast is the mark of something groundbreaking." I mean, Hollywood has never been unoriginal really but it's not whatever these two are doing requires much skill or talent. Also, there's a whole world of international/arthouse cinema these guys won't touch.
honestly after seeing Oppenheimer at first i was like it was alright but rethinking it, it was an amazing movie. such beautiful shots and a great way to tell the story
Some people just think surface layer which ruins the movie.
Yes! I found it to be one of the best biopics ive ever seen. The directing REALLY were stellar
That's not enough to make a movie great, the characters were flat and robotic. Actors were great but the characters weren't written anything like real people
I think that means you're slow, but you got there
The music is one of the greatest ever
As someone who like science and history and politics and cinema and music, Oppenheimer is my favorite film of all time. The first 2 hours and 15 min felt like an hour. The last 45 min felt like 1.5 hour. Already watched 2 times, both on the best seat, IMAX 70mm and digital IMAX. I will watch it again when IMAX 70mm is not fully packed. Oppenheimer felt like a piece of real memory.
Agreed his style of film making was perfect for this type of subject matter. I feel if anyone else but Nolan made this film it would of been mundane. He really knows how to make any situation impactful.
Oppenheimer is Nolan's masterpiece...its a 3hr movie and wow it kept me at the edge of my seat and Cillian Murphy was born to play Oppenheimer
It’s Nolan “Masterpiece”? Bro what? Freaking Inception and The Prestige is a way better movie then Oppenheimer 🤦🏾♂️. I swear every time a major movie comes out from a good director you guys are like “this sh*t is a masterpiece” smh🙄. I can just tell you guys are not a Nolan fan but are just generic fans of movies
@@intello8953 hm but thats ur opinion.. for me Oppenheimer is on par with prestige.. and prestige is my favourite
@@inthevoidreality lol it’s 100% not but ok I guess
Nah, his masterpieces are Inception and Interstellar. Oppenheimer was great. But those films are 10/10
@@intello8953nah it’s not. This movie trumps inception although not by a lot. Inception explored perception of reality and the dream within a dream concept but the acting was worse. This movie just explored deeper philosophical questions and the acting was overall better. They’re both great movies though
Never seen 2 people misunderstand movies so hard.
Andrew usually has bad takes on movies
Thinking Oppenheimer is “aight” genuinely feels like an insult
I don't think he means any disrespect
@@kartinmarl.7804nah, first its an opinion so who cares. Also, yeah the movie after the bomb went of dragged for so long with RDJ’s character. I liked the movie, but wouldn’t watch it again. And Barbie had good jokes but overall terrible 🗿
@@ChampionOfHammerfellyou're too opinionated, ur scaring the hoes
The problem with people seeing Oppenheimer is that they expect to be entertained, as if it was an action-packed blockbuster (that’s how I went into it). But the fact is, it’s a complex character study about a man who’s faced with a huge moral dilemma and how he deals with that. That’s what the film does best. It’s absolutely not for everyone but I think part of the negative criticism of the film is that people expect it to be something that it’s not.
. etc- 70more days till out of theaters^
The thing with Oppenheimer - I thought it was a 8/10 watching it - but I spent the whole next day thinking about it, government, the military industrial complex, etc. (yeah it may sound corny - but the film makes you think.) Which is why I think it is a crowning achievement - It's not the most entertaining film, but it makes you feel something.
I find that with most of Nolans movies tbh, i think about them for a wk after. Not seen Oppenheimer yet tho.
it stayed with me on the ride home....I think that was its job
It's corny to think?
Ya know what? That silly Barbie movie also made ya think. Crazy. Can't wait to see Opp.
the major issue was people went to get a Dark Knight treatment for a biopic type movie
All of these guys are garden variety retards.
The whole point of the of Barbie is the inverse of the "morale" you thought it was.
It's satire on how women get so few seats in congress, so similarly Kens are only in the beginning stages of their rights.
Not every movie is for everyone but man did these guys completely miss the points of each movie
He def didn't understand the end of barbie
I feel like to fully appreciate Oppenheimer you have to have some knowledge of the physics behind it. Seeing all of the famous physicists who’s equations you use almost every day of your life gave the movie more depth and caused me to be truly excited throughout.
I also feel like you need to know more about history. Why in the scene where they get the reports that the Germans are closer to a reactor and not a bomb was because heisenberg and others were deliberately sabotaging the project. Or why we actually dropped the bomb on Japan. Sure we could’ve won without it but the Japanese are on record that they would never have stopped and made it a war of attrition. This isn’t a patriotic film it’s a biopic depicting the events around oppi and the knowledge he held . Imo the message of the movie is to be wary of a nuclear war and to not use those weapons lightly because you can legitimately set the atmosphere on fire
you definitely don't. Anyone can fully appreciate it.
If you have some knowledge about the topic, you would enjoy it more for sure. Like when Oppenheimer found out that splitting the atom was possible. I understand how important it was and it's more impactful for me.
Bro that made me hate the scientists even more 🤦🏾♂️😂. “Wow we found a way to split the atom…………… let’s make a weapon out of this to kill other human beings” not a good look. But I do understand learning the science behind it is amazing
@@intello8953 Unfortunately the world is not a friendly place at the highest levels. Having stronger weapons than your enemy is incredibly important. It is sad but that's reality.
you can always count on Andrew and his crew to have the most smooth brain opinions on any topic
The guy is a an absolute fool. Just as vapid as most comedians.
Are y’all BOTS? You and other comments are repeating almost the same thing word for word. Weird.
Oppenheimer has already made more than twice it’s budget worldwide and it’s going to be in theaters for 100 days, longest time in like 10 years. It’s gunna crush everything
Oppenheimer is for people who can follow dialgue & story telling.
It's the best film I've seen since Flight with Denzel & eclipses it by a county mile
It’s in the top 5 Movies for me. But it’s not for everyone and it’s not a perfect movie. If you’re not into philosophical thought provoking movies and ur not looking at interesting cinematic shots then it’s not for you
If you really know about the story of Barbie you would know that the original creator of the doll Barbie is Ruth Marianna Handler the wife of one of the co-founders of Mattel Elliot Handler. The original doll was named Bild Lilli doll. Which was based off a old comic that portrayed a blond promiscuous woman who was not afraid to use men to her advantage. Mattel later bought the rights to the doll and
Redesigned it to be Barbie. The doll was named after Ruth's daughter Barbara and then the made the ken doll and named it after her son
Kenneth.
Now to the movie which if you've seen it you can clearly see there are hidden messages and imagery. That being said in the beginning it has little girls discovering barbie in a reference to a movie called 2001 A Space Odyssey it, it shows them happily destroy their boring and oppressive baby dolls in violence and destruction. An obvious visual metaphor of little girls destroying the embodiment of motherhood to focus their lives instead on a shallow materialistic piece of consumerist trash and if this is lost on any of you people to realize then you guys are basically their target audience for this movie. The movie is basically about Barbie living in a fantasy land called Barbie land a place portrayed as a peaceful feminist utopia where all the important jobs are done by the Barbies and the kens just exist and give no inherent value, that they contribute nothing that they have no power or say in how their society is run and they're basically looked down on as silly and irrelevant by the Barbies.
I considered that to be the message of the film, but considering the hyper-modern-feminist director and Mattel's oversight, it seems unlikely that they were intentionally criticizing Barbie's influence as a product. Though, obviously I'd love for what you're saying to be true.
….it’s basically like a movie for female incels 😂😂😂
@@WEAPON-MRX the opposite is true for men. So you have 0 value, you fuckin virgin 😂
Thank u. I am a woman but will not go c that bashing on men n making them look stupid. N kinda erasing family life. But that what feminist do. I had a hard working dad n amazing mom who was there everday caring for us a job in itself. The movie makes me sick to my stomach.
But then little girls go and rip head of their barbie dolls, cut their hair, put weird make up on them. Girls like to destroy things just as boys do.
Timestamps:
00:00 - The video expresses a negative sentiment towards the lack of originality in Hollywood and the current state of the entertainment industry.
00:03 - The video discusses a scene from a Barbie movie that surprises the speaker with its moral message.
00:35 - The video describes a scenario in the Barbie movie where Barbie and Ken are depicted in different worlds, highlighting the influence of the patriarchal system.
01:06 - The video suggests a scenario in Barbie land where Barbies emotionally manipulate individuals, causing conflicts and manipulations among them.
01:40 - The video discusses a scene involving a bomb explosion and questions the necessity of atomic bombs in war.
02:27 - The video discusses a movie scene where a military base is pitted against a town, creating confusion and ambiguity.
03:35 - The video expresses mixed opinions about various movies and characters, including admiration for filmmaker Christopher Nolan and disappointment at the absence of a Batman trilogy from him.
04:11 - The video emphasizes the significance of creating immersive and identity-driven experiences for fans and discusses the marketing strategy employed by a particular movie.
04:49 - The video describes the author's experience at a movie theater and comments on the effectiveness of the marketing strategy for a specific movie.
05:27 - The video discusses the perception and reception of the movie Barbie, including the expectation of numerical scores and the verification process for audience ratings.
06:30 - The video discusses a movie scene involving Ryan Gosling's performance and expresses admiration for his humor and comedic timing.
07:04 - The video mentions conservatives' reactions to the movie Barbie and speculates about their concerns regarding its influence on children.
07:43 - The video discusses jokes in movies, the cultural relevance of toys like Barbie and Super Mario, and the popularity of dressing up for Star Wars events.
08:11 - The video discusses the movie Brothers, including positive reviews and the speaker's personal enjoyment of it.
09:10 - The video mentions the movie Oppenheimer and the absence of likable characters in it, highlighting the involvement of individuals associated with creating nuclear weapons.
09:43 - The video presents fragmented thoughts and opinions about Oppenheimer, expressing a critical perspective on his actions and beliefs.
10:14 - The video features a casual conversation discussing various topics, including communism, nuclear weapons, Russia, Russian women, and actress Margot Robbie.
We've crafted timestamps to help you time! Show your support by subscribing to this video and our channel. If you'd like to go the additional mile, you can buy us a coffee at besaw.me/thanks Your generosity means everything to us! ☕
Donators can have access to our Facebook Group, learn top-income strategies, and test apps like the instant chatbot creator below.
Unlock the full potential of ChatGPT-4's advanced features for your chatbot projects! Bypass the normal restrictions after signing up for our free trial - only email is needed. Experience the magic now at: besaw.me/trial
Video Description:
The video discussed in this conversation covers various topics, including movies, characters, and cultural references. It begins with expressing a negative sentiment towards the lack of originality in Hollywood and the current state of the entertainment industry. The conversation then delves into a discussion about a scene from a Barbie movie that surprises the speaker with its moral message. It describes a scenario in the movie where Barbie and Ken are depicted in different worlds, highlighting the influence of the patriarchal system. The conversation suggests a scenario in Barbie land where Barbies emotionally manipulate individuals, causing conflicts and manipulations among them. It further discusses a scene involving a bomb explosion and questions the necessity of atomic bombs in war. The video also touches on a movie scene where a military base is pitted against a town, creating confusion and ambiguity. Mixed opinions about various movies and characters are expressed, including admiration for filmmaker Christopher Nolan and disappointment at the absence of a Batman trilogy from him. The significance of creating immersive and identity-driven experiences for fans is emphasized, along with discussions about marketing strategies employed in movies. The video describes the author's experience at a movie theater and comments on the effectiveness of the marketing strategy for a specific movie. It also discusses the perception and reception of the movie Barbie, including the expectation of numerical scores and the verification process for audience ratings. The conversation covers a movie scene involving Ryan Gosling's performance, conservatives' reactions to the movie Barbie, jokes in movies, the cultural relevance of toys like Barbie and Super Mario, and the popularity of dressing up for Star Wars events. The video mentions the movie Brothers, positive reviews, and personal enjoyment of it. It also discusses the movie Oppenheimer and the absence of likable characters in it, highlighting the involvement of individuals associated with creating nuclear weapons. Fragmented thoughts and opinions about Oppenheimer are presented, expressing a critical perspective on his actions and beliefs. The conversation concludes with a casual discussion about various topics, including communism, nuclear weapons, Russia, Russian women, and actress Margot Robbie.
Wat the fuck
OPP was a 3 hr movie... for the sheer length, it kept me engaged; which says alot; for a movie that long..
And the ending scene. Or the revelation about what Einstein actually said. Nice bow on the whole thing
Schulz saying Oppenheimer was “alright” is indicative of his choices with his run as an actor.
More indictive of his retarded mental state.
I don't mean that as a throwaway slur. His mental state is literally held back if he cannot appreciate the greater context and history of this film
Honestly y’all it felt tongue in cheek and satirical. I don’t think you should be taking it SOOO literally
expecting anything batman from oppenheimer is the most ridiculous thing. i loved it. its about the then current political climate, the heavy decision making between whats right from wrong, from the personal, professional, social, and political level. it was meant to put us there in the shoes of everyone and feel it deeply, very anxiety inducing and amazingly done. expectations are the biggest enemy of pleasure. I'm always excited for a nolan movie but i can't compare movies directly because they're usually different. his movies are his children in a way and i woundnt compare my children. sure its not for every one, but the right mindset and context can put you off
. etc-
I don't understand how someone can't see the beauty of Oppenheimer. This movie is a complete cinematic experience. Tension, great dillema, complex characters, amazing cinematography, visuel storytelling at it's best, the sound editing and soundtrack is INSANE.
Saying you went to that movie expecting "The Batman trilogy" experience is one dumb way to anticipate a biopic movie about an historical figure and invention.
Ppl can disagree with you lmao
professional comedians utterly incapable of recognizing or understanding basic satire
I understand the Barbieland parts of the movie were used as an engine for satire, but it's not satire to beat the drums of "The real world is a horribly oppressive patriarchy." They believe that, and they don't sugarcoat it. It's in every atom of feminist art. Barbie gets ogled, cat-called, and sexually assaulted within 5 seconds of being in LA. Mattel is run by evil patriarchs even though the real Mattel has always been largely ran by women. All men are depicted as absent-minded, stupid, manipulative, evil.
How so? Im a bit ignorant to that statement and I'd love to know what you meant by that.
@@SenorzilchnzeroThey are talking about Barbie, it was a satire on gender roles. They changed Barbieland so Kens could have more influence on the territory. I think they are saying that people are seeing Barbie on a surface level.
Nah he gets it. He's uncomfortable with it because of his politics.
Andrew's perception day on day is going down
His perception isnt the only thing going down. It seems like alot of these "professional" comedians, their standup is weak! Rogan is weak, Andrew, Tom just took a dive imo, Bert was NEVER funny (he just laughs at his own jokes) and dont get me started on female comics. The only pro comedian who is still funny is C.K.
@@Senorzilchnzero "I don't find it funny so it's not funny" crowd is always weird, I wonder if it is stupidity or narcissism.
@@Senorzilchnzero when did this happen?
They've been pretty cringy since they got into big money. All of them including my favorite Mark
@@Senorzilchnzeroyup is cas they buddies of joe and have gained big following Because how big he is. Anyone who sucked up to him has blown up.
I enjoyed seeing everyone in the theater wearing pink more than the movie itself. I wish it was a bit more fun
❤
imax isnt just visual lol and i was locked in watching it. flawless imo
ps- i dont think jidion is funny tbh
Not a flawless movie at all but still incredible. Id say pulp fiction is close to a flawless movie but this movie still beats pulp fiction for me despite imperfections
Oppie has rizzzz
Oppenheimer was amazingly well paced. Didn't look at phone at all
Andrew needs to rewatch the movie, bad takes. Also, needs to relearn his history as to why we dropped the two bombs.
Precisely. Japan was not surrendering short of a complete occupation of their land. The casualties required for that invasion would have been astronomical for both sides.
Also, for anyone wondering about the need to stand up to Japanese imperialism in the Pacific and South East Asia, Japan exterminated somewhere between 3-30 million people during their occupation. To cry about 100 000-200 000 Japanese deaths without considering the horror they inflicted on others is disingenuous
@@mjz667so they had to drop the Bomb on civilians 🤨
@@intello8953 Wasn't a big enough Military target to demonstrate the bomb's power. This is a well known and documented discussion if you study history.
They also mention it in passing in the film
The military dictatorship of Japan had done a fantastic job of creating a cult of personality around the Japanese Emperor, even though they controlled him. You can see the utter devotion of Japanese soldiers to their country's cause demonstrated by the existence of kamikaze pilots, the culture of Sepukku and the fact that whole platoons did not surrender at the end of the war and carried on fighting in certain places.
The Americans understood Japan's desire to fight to the bitter end, a fact many are forgetting to history in their quest to be nice rather than objective. They knew nothing short of a completely successful invasion and take-over of Japan would end the war. The cost of securing this objective would have been utterly devastating in terms of casualties to both sides. It would have also been a very protracted phase of the war. The Japanese civilian populace would have fought a guerilla war on the next level (Emperor worship, remember?).
The sheer efficiency of the nuclear bombings demonstrated clearly to the Japanese the stakes of continuing the war and thank God, for the sake of the Japanese people, they made the right decision in surrendering. It was also the right decision for the Americans because of the lives saved on their side. The action also saved Japanese lives because an invasion would have been far more devastating. Which is why America would also have been justified to keep on bombing Japan.
I will also add context to the historical situation. Enola Gay dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima on the evening of the 6th of August 1945. This was announced by President Truman the next morning, the 7th of August. The Japanese had two days to surrender but did not. The bombing of Nagasaki followed on the 9th. This further demonstrates Japan's unwillingness to surrender. It was not a fog of war situation. Eyewitness accounts in Japan document that the Japanese realization of a single, city destroying bomb was, within minutes, shortly after the bombing and even before Truman's announcement the next day. This demonstrates the cost of prolonging the war far outweighed the cost of the bomb.
In my mind, it was a small price to pay based on the havoc Japan inflicted on South-East Asia and the Pacific in the form of 'the Asian Holocaust'. By which they killed an estimated 30 million people in those countries.
We need to study history to ensure we do not repeat the mistakes of the past. We have had relative peace following WWII thanks to nuclear weaponry. History teaches us the path to peace is deterrence and the path to war is diplomacy. I pray America has been using her superior military spending to develop her best weapons even further and as strongly as possible. There are too many bad actors in this world who would curtail the relative freedom that Pax Americana has bestowed on the West. I also hope more countries such as Ukraine and those held in the bondage of Eastern suspicion and superstition can experience it. This will only happen if America can demonstrate further supremacy. Especially in areas of powerful weaponry
@@mjz667 so because there was a “cult following” and not enough “military target” that killing civilians was rational? When Americans and the British *the Soviets is a different thing* that killing is ok now? I hate hypocrisy so much maybe that’s why I’m confused by this whole thing. But thank God I wasn’t in that position
Edit: also America has used its military horrendously around the world and became a Neo Empire 🤷🏾♂️
Oppenheimer was OPPENOVERRATED
Saw Oppenheimer opening day on 70mm and thought it was just alright. They speed run through so many things certain events are awkward (like a scene with his newborn) and most people aren’t fleshed out. You need to provide the context to give the movie meaning
"There is not one good character in the movie" has gotta be the most wack take ive ever heard. Oppenheimer is fantastic.
EDIT: I realize he’s talking about character morality but dude still made wack takes 😂
I think he meant morally good , not good as in performance
I think he meant good as in good vs evil. None of the characters are clearly "good" people. Everyone's complicated.
@@casual4560 That’s gotta be the case. Cause all these actors delivered some PERFORMANCES.
@@willsintheair you right!
He explained himself at 9:25. It was about morality
I think the fundamental point that Schulz is missing, and it’s not to his fault, that you need to be educated to appreciate this film. Not everyone has the aptitude for science and grounded films. At the end of the day, Schulz is a comic from the superhero fandom generation, and that’s how his expectations from every film is.
This is entertainment and Andrew is college educated
6:24 Dude says "I'm not a woman". My brain instantly looks at how Aakash is sitting😂
Schulz is cosplaying as Prison Mike from The Office.
I see the dude on the left is cosplaying as one of the priests from Conan the Barbarian.
I personally liked Barbie. I didn't take any of it serious - and therefore I found the entire thing funny because it was all satire. Some messaging wasn't for me, but it wasn't meant to be lol.
If the mere idea that patriarchy may exist offends you, then don't watch this movie.
Jidion missed the point as to why Kens don't have power (satire). In fact, it was explicitly expressed that the barbies were treating the kens as women are treated in the real world. It was definitely an eye for eye makes the world makes the world blind - type of position. It wasn't a - the world is better when women run shit- it was an eye for an eye.
If you don't think you are gonna like Barbie cause of the things you are hearing because it is woke or whatever, do yourself a favor and don't watch it lol.
EDIT: I should have been more explicit about "real world". In their universe they have two worlds: Barbie world and the real world. not literally our world lmfao. The real world is an exaggeration/satire on our world and some parts are fictitious, e.g., they have a portal to the barbie world in their "real world"🤣
I'm a woman in the real world and I get treated nothing like the Kens got treated in the movie. The messaging is outdated, moot and academic.
Good thing there isn't a matriarchy
If you really know about the story of Barbie you would know that the original creator of the doll Barbie is Ruth Marianna Handler the wife of one of the co-founders of Mattel Elliot Handler. The original doll was named Bild Lilli doll. Which was based off a old comic that portrayed a blond promiscuous woman who was not afraid to use men to her advantage. Mattel later bought the rights to the doll and resigned it to be Barbie. The doll was named after Ruth's daughter Barbara and then the made the ken doll and named it after her son
Kenneth.
Now to the movie which if you've seen it you can clearly see there are hidden messages and imagery. That being said in the beginning it has little girls discovering barbie in a reference to a movie called 2001 A Space Odyssey it, it shows them happily destroy their boring and oppressive baby dolls in violence and destruction. An obvious visual metaphor of little girls destroying the embodiment of motherhood to focus their lives instead on a shallow materialistic piece of consumerist trash and if this is lost on any of you people to realize then you guys are basically their target audience for this movie. The movie is basically about Barbie living in a fantasy land called Barbie land a place portrayed as a peaceful feminist utopia where all the important jobs are done by the Barbies and the kens just exist and give no inherent value, that they contribute nothing that they have no power or say in how their society is run and they're basically looked down on as silly and irrelevant by the Barbies.
@@tobaccoffee506Blesz your heart
@@tobaccoffee506 fixed my post. I can see how people can be easily confused when I say "real world" despite it being in the context of the movie's plot.
He’s a Nolan fan and he thought it was “aight” haha… okay bro
Jidion couldn't even properly say what happened at the end of the movie and completely missed the mark with his take. Also, seems like he didn't get the message of the movie. While it was heavily politicized, the point of the movie wasn't "screw all men". It's funny that Barbieland was trying to be a mirror of the real world (but with women in power), and some men got super offended by it. Very ironic.
I enjoyed watching Oppenheimer, but I think for those who didn't enjoy the film as much was because of how the movie was promoted. In short, if you are into history you will love this film, if you are expecting shit to blow up every 15 minutes because it's a Nolan film, then you will be disappointed.
**Small Spoilers ahead**
It was promoted as if the movie was going to be about the Atomic bomb and the world causes and consequences of creating it (I also thought it would be about this). Half of the movie is about how Oppenheimer ended up leading a group of scientists to create the bomb but in actuality the movie is about Oppenheimer trying to keep his government security clearance. As one of my friend's put it "there was too much diologue". The film does take some time to show Oppenheimer's regrets once it's created. It also shows his regrets before it was created but he only agreed to do it because the Nazi's were already working on it and it was seen as "It's best if we have it before them".
Oppenheimer was fantastic
Rotten tomatoes verified just means people who bought the tickets so it’s more accurate than all audience
albeit small, Einstein was a 'good person' character in the film.
You include the Hiroshima nuke scene and the movie is 10/10. I understand why they didn’t show it.. because it’s all Oppenheimers pov. It’s his story. But still. I wanted more scale from the nuke scene. The score was intense asf tho
They could have done more with it I agree but it didn’t take away that much from the movie. Still thought the movie was incredible
@@redarrowhead2 100%. I’m just nitpicking a lil.
Like I would ever go to these numpties for movie review. Specially of film like Oppenheimer.
It’s one of those movies that make you think beyond the movie, not surface level stuff. Plus Andrew saying all the characters were not “good” people just shows he never understood the movie.
@@Dawg476that’s what I found disappointing about the movie, I feel like it didn’t evoke further thought. What kind of questions did it make you ask?
You're literally here.
@@Dawg476hes a garden variety retard.
I’m a woman and thought the Barbie movie was boring
Same. All the “funny” parts were in the trailer, and weren’t even that funny? I was honestly let down. I was expecting better.
Damn I really understood Oppenheimer different from Schulz. I didn’t think Oppenheimer was portrayed as a piece of shit more just as a flawed person who tried to do what he thought was best for the world, especially since it was wartime. The most POS thing he did in that movie was probably cheat on his wife but everyone back then cheated on their wife anyway
It did less than Batman vs Superman. Let's chill with how historic it is.
That movie was mid as hell
Andrew thought The Idol was great so his opinion on movies/shows is alil ehh 😂
My take away of Oppenheimer wasnt that he was a “piece of shit person” and i didnt think everyone in the movie were bad ppl. Had a way different perspective than andrew
So your gonna say it’s “complex” also? 🙄
This man completely missed the point of the film. Never was it said or alluded to, that men don’t deserve no rights. Ken needed to find value and a purpose for himself rather than looking for it in Barbie. Oppenheimer was absolutely incredible. Schulz meant there wasn’t any good hearted people not that characters were badly performing or written, which I mostly agree. RDJ and Nolan perfectly portrayed a spiteful, delusional and narcissistic man in Lewis Strauss. Nolan and Murphy beautifully depicted the shifts In Oppenheimer from a restless genius level student to a gifted physicist, to the eager head of the Manhattan project to an old man plagued by the guilt of his choices. Throughout the movie there is the dread that is culminates by the end of the film, the vision of the planet destroyed by the weapons Oppenheimer unleashed in the world.
This is proof why we can’t have nice things. Movie was fun asf but of course people are taking away the wrong message.
“You like the dark knight?” Like bruh 🤣
Yeah Oppenheimer is top tier Nolan
my daughters r in college so i have no reason to see the movie but to be fair the barbie doll universe always made ken a side character with really no development
Yeah because men have action men. Small soilders is a great movie.
Andrew in a durag though hahahaha
Barbie was the biggest bait and switch I've seen in while. Barbie suffers from the feminist paradox.
Oppenheimer is for people who had some knowledge of Science and Politics. Its not as good as Interstellar or Dark Knight.
its a biography not a fking fictional for kids
The whole movie was about how horrible men are
Somehow they missed the point of both movies.
Commentary about originality coming from a prankster TH-camr is comical.
4:10 Exactly how I felt about Schultz Netflix show lol
The Flagrant crew is soo afraid of being canceled it's embarrassing
Right on
100%. Andrew got famous from playing middle. Now he’s a liberal pretending to be middle.
Afraid of being cancelled for what?
@joceja23 Huh? he would not get 'cancelled' for that.
@joceja23 Andrew Schulz calls out wokeness all the time why would this time be any different?
I can relate with Andrew when he is saying that Christopher Nolan is the greatest director alive. Sometimes I am so emotional and passionate talking with someone about his movies that I almost cry 😅😅😅
Me with Kanye’s music🥹. And Nolan films of course
What is your favourite Nolan film?
@@intello8953 Interstellar, if I had to pick one. You?
What Endgame was to guys, Barbie is to girls.
endgame??? u mean children ?
Lol you think the MCU had a gendered audience?
WTF does MCU have to do anything
you should replace endgame with dark knight
endgame is The Godfather of super heroes. but women literally have Kill Bill movies. Barbie is bad for kids and lots of toxicity for adults.
Oppenheimer has Black Widow's kid sister in a nude scene. One time for Historical Heavies!!!!!
I feel like I’m the only one that understands this movie. The Kens and their revolution are an allegory for modern feminism that in some instances has gone too far. They aren’t given what they want at the end of the movie because just because you were oppressed, doesn’t mean that the answer is to completely upend the structure of society. That is a criticism of modern feminism. And by the way. Our main Barbie CHOOSES TO LEAVE BARBIELAND.
Technically speaking, Oppenheimer was brilliant, but it fell short in the storytelling and the emotional aspects of a true masterpiece. I think Nolan could've focused less on the pace and theatrics of it and explored more of Oppenheimer's inner conflict of developing the bomb and the emotional struggle from the accusations of him being a communist. He was clearly the protagonist and rightfully so, but Nolan overall fell short of having the audience fully root for Oppenheimer and pity him for wrongfully being a target of the US, despite being a loyal patriot.
the entire movie(barbie) was satire, lol...dont take it too seriously, its hilarious.
Andrew ain't too smart.
why is everyone wearing durags
The verified system on RT means it can verified you’ve seen the movie, not that you’re a Hollywood insider
It's crazy how much desinformation one can spread. I was like tf Dijion talking about...?
How would they verify that tho?
@@ladyj3173 the same way you’re verified as being the actual person you claim to be on Twitter before Elon Musk took over
There's no argument that didn't need to happen and I'll explain why. When the bombs were dropped Japan surrendered 3 weeks later. The reason they surrendered so quickly is because USA lied an said they had more bombs to drop of them. Which in turn saved alot of American and allied troops. I'm sorry but it's war and you're supposed to do whats best for your side to stop the blood shed. That's why it had to happen. Otherwise would of gone on for month's even years if the emperor wouldn't surrender.
Take a shot everytime JiDion says "Like" and you will be drunk in no time.
I'm planning to smoke a lot before I go see Barbie. I wanna be stoned af. I think I'll really enjoy it like that. Otherwise I'm not wasting my time. Christopher's movie is definitely something I wanna go see.
Would a fucking spoiler warning hurt?
Im guessing people expected Oppenheimer to be a action pack movie, li everyone expected the latest Batman movie to be a action packed! Nigguh Batman is a mf detective 😂
Jidion got the line from the movie completely wrong
Only 3 things I didn't like about Oppenheimer: The nuke scene was silent at explosion, like an anti-climax. Also didn't show the 2 bombs on Japan. And last hour of movie was commie bullshit.
Both movies were told exactly how they were meant to be told.
Barbie for me is inconsistent especially if it’s supposed to be “woke”. Literally no one cared about Allen, the only unique person there. All that movie proved was equality is not the goal for feminism.
Oppenheimer was probably too realistic and that’s what made it so uncomfortable. Everyone sucked morally, and no one cared. They used and abused each other then celebrated their selves. I’d call it the problem of human nature. Because every human is capable of doing what they did in principle.
The only thing historic is they had to use two movies to claim anything historic, we're not even top five but if we add them together 🤔
Idk if I would’ve went in expecting dark knight Nolan
Shultz is quite a bit off on this take . It’s not supposed to be like Batman
I am excited these two movies did well!
I didn't know that Andrew and I have so much in common. He mentioned exactly what I was thinking.
Man they brushed passed that Barbie movie real quick
I used to love this pod but Akaash’s takes are so terrible that they drive me away from the pod, Alex too, but I’m not going to be talking about Alex on this one.
In recent events, this has been Akaash’s stance:
Men who are upset at the Barbie movie are automatically conservative
and it’s “gay” to care about Barbie.
First, your leftist allies would call you sexist with that position. Next, people don’t care about the movie, people are outraged about the terrible script and the messaging conveyed - especially to little kids.
Akaash then denies that it was being marketed to young girls. You don’t think women will take their daughters to a Barbie movie? Also, if it wasn’t marketed as a movie for kids, tell me what the age rating is then… I’ll wait.
About two weeks ago, or whenever the Jonah Hill situation was happening, leave it to Akaash to side with the leftist agenda. “Jonah Hill is insecure”, and most men - actual men that have been with more than one woman - saw those messages, knew it was for clout, and actually sided with Jonah because his boundaries were reasonably set.
I had a post before stating how the Flagrant crew went left-leaning all of a sudden, maybe it was always that way and I didn’t notice it earlier or my observation is right.
The Barbie movie had me laughing bro they disrespect the shit out of men I ain’t even tripping it was just crazy seeing that
It had some hilarious moments haha.. specially when Barbie got scared at seeing the weird barbie up close 😂
Andrew we have to have a chat
If it's about the doorag you've obviously not watched the start of the podcast
@@ednamode2334 nope haah
That is the whole point, dude, the famous Oppenheimer line ..I become death the destroyer of words , the dude feel like shit after make the bomb... one Andrew sounds like smart asf the next one like a dork. Haha, the dude is confusing ..
Oppenheimer was a great movie , not every nolan movie is a batman movie....
Funny how they missed the obvious joke about the barbie movie. Where we see the Barbie’s treat the guys like shit is just a direct representation of how women are treated in today’s world. Lmao
Expecting jidion to understand that was never on my list😒
Men are treated like shit not the other way around lol
Truly a fantasy world.
Lmao. Women are t treated like shit at all though. If anything they get a lot of rights they barely deserve.
Except it isn't, like at all. Women are treated as well as men in modern society (assuming we're talking about the America that Barbie is satirizing).
This channel has got so "please don't cancel us..." Unsubscribe
Wow this maybe was the worst trying of an analysis of a movie in history
"Hearing this, His Majesty stated that the advent of the new weapon like the atomic bomb made it impossible to continue the persecution of war and steps should be taken to end the war without delay." August 8th, 1945 Gaimusho (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) ed. Shusen Shiroku (The Historical Records of the End of the War), annotated by Jun Eto, volume 4, 57-60 [Excerpts] [Translation by Toshihiro Higuchi]
Oppenheimer prolly the best movie of the decade stop with this.
Anyone that is running to watch Barbie… seems to be a specific type of person.
Stop making assumptions.
It's scary how that dude brought up politics in a movie review. American filmmaking has become so political and divisive, no child should be indoctrinated by some creepy Hollywood executives
Hollywood has been epic fail
At first I thought all wearing white socks like making white socks cool again, but just cups…
jeeez did andrew even watch the movie, what is he talking about ?!? Clearly his ADHD brain was in the barbie land, you gotta watch Oppenheimer again my dude, you really missed the plot if that is your takeaway.
I liked op ngl