You can derive values using the equation of nuclear relativity. You can assume that the experiment takes place in our universe and not in a parallel one, and although this can never be proven, this means that all values will be preparation as opposed to manufacturer. Plain evaluate the inspector using generate trigonum lackeydom jip jips and/or blip blips. Mixability explains some but not all of the lepidopterologists in this particular case. Region percentage photo makes procedure entail aquebrazasemos. Fisherman.
First of all, it not 63.8. Its 100-63.8 Second he is not doing it under STP conditions. You will have to find the STP volume yourself using gas law. I hope this helps
@@heidijordan8230 am doing a similar experiment myself, but in my case am finding the molar mass of the magnesium used using different masses of magnesium and compare to the resulting volume of hydrogen gas. So far I have only 5% error which is good enough for me.
Cégep d'Amos, we're here !!!!
Do you know how to take out the results. I need the calculations parts I don't know how to do it. Please help
same
You can derive values using the equation of nuclear relativity. You can assume that the experiment takes place in our universe and not in a parallel one, and although this can never be proven, this means that all values will be preparation as opposed to manufacturer. Plain evaluate the inspector using generate trigonum lackeydom jip jips and/or blip blips. Mixability explains some but not all of the lepidopterologists in this particular case. Region percentage photo makes procedure entail aquebrazasemos. Fisherman.
@@charlieluke1886are you having a schizophrenic episode dawg 😭🙏
But according to the stoichiometry volume should be 55.08 ml at STP for 0.059 g of strip how we got 63.8 ml?
First of all, it not 63.8. Its 100-63.8
Second he is not doing it under STP conditions. You will have to find the STP volume yourself using gas law. I hope this helps
@@theevolver5151 100-63.80? Does that mean that the value we will plug in for n = PV/RT is 36.2 mL or 0.0362 L? And not 63.80?
@@heidijordan8230 correct, it's the change in volume itself.
@@heidijordan8230 am doing a similar experiment myself, but in my case am finding the molar mass of the magnesium used using different masses of magnesium and compare to the resulting volume of hydrogen gas. So far I have only 5% error which is good enough for me.
Professor Dao es la cabra?
pablo escobar
Uuuuuuuuus naaag@@Samo-tp3zy
pls next time average the volume of your video or take precosions to speak close to the microphone
Yes. Beacuse. Vidoe🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Mantab