Superb "real world" test. Applaud the Bravery of DCAR to take on this challenge! No doubt making some strong angry management at the Auto Companies around the world,
It seems the conclusion of this test is that if big trucks and passenger cars have to share the same roads a redesign or reinforcement of the rear crash structure on large trucks to work with passengers cars would be easier than to redesign all passenger cars?
@@older12000or may be a rearward protruding energy absorbing bumper which will give space and energy absorption before A pillar hits to rigid corner of the truck
@@TANOCA17 commercial vehicles, even some containers, may need to back up to a dock to unload. This means that the back must be vertically flat and cannot have any reactive features of their own.
The Maybach/S class B pillar survived because it was so long the front crash structure struck the rear wheels of the trailer before the B-pillar could come into contact with the trailer (which in the real world may be a factor, but is not indicative of the strength of the B-pillar).
We should note that the support rigidity on both sides of the truck's rear anti-collision beam is obviously insufficient. When it collides with the vehicle behind it, it breaks directly without absorbing enough impact kinetic energy. As a result, the rear A-pillar was inserted directly into the truck chassis. The engine compartment of the rear car was not fully folded to absorb the impact energy. So truck rear bumper regulations must be changed.
well, that's the reality for people outside the US. underride safety is not strict in some Asian countries (China, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc) unlike in the US which is really strict, its pretty common sight of trucks or trailers that dont have an underride guard at all.
IIHS did a demonstration on this a long time ago but I don't think there was a government mandate, so many trailers may still have this sort of rear crash guard.
@@hyrenaj2888 Since IIHS test bunch of underride guards, the trailer manufacturer make the guard stronger so it passed IIHS test. IIHS publicly shared the result so the manufacturer can feel ashamed about the results and yes they did feel ashamed so they made the guard stronger. But here in asia, none of those happen. If you rear end a trailer in the US, i think you will have a chance to survive, but in here you will hit straight to heaven 😶
International viewer here - probably the most real world style of crash is this - going full speed into a truck at night ..never expected some of these models to fail like this
Good job guys! Best crash test that ive seen! Will you do more crash tests with cars like Lexus, Toyota Land Cruiser 200 or Prado, Acura, Audi and etc? Your test are best and all information are given.
That one surprised me the most. I knew Tesla would win because they have been good at structural strength for years but to see a new car company performing that well in remarkable
I find it very nice and efficient from the car crash company and you guys that you respect every car brand aswell as you see them all in a neutral perspective. 🎉
Thank you so much for performing this kind of crash test. So know we all know that, the most fragile part of car structure is in A-B pillar and front beam of the roof. When the pillars and beam collapses, it will directly hit our head and causing fatal death. That is really concerning. I think manufacturers must find a solution and do internal test like this immediately. This kind of test should be standard in the world.
This is what the auto industry needs. Usually i tend to hate on the Chinese automotive industry due to their poorly designed and built cars. But this is just next level. This should be a standard test for all cars. Congratulations
They’re definitely improving and very impressive considering how they already almost leveled themselves with brands of other countries that’s been around for much longer
You've done an amazing job with this video! The dedication to providing us with such detailed and informative content is truly commendable. Keep up the fantastic work, it's clear that a lot of time, effort, and money goes into making your channel so educational and entertaining.
Great video and kudos on the effort.both the tests and the video production !! Given most new cars have AEB , how’s that factored into the test ? Do you turn it off ? Maybe AEB systems mean structures can be made lighter and as a consequence weaker ..as they are not expecting to run into the back of a truck like this ? Or at the very least not without a level of braking and all safety systems at high alert ?
This is a side effect of manufacturers designing cars to excel in very specific crash tests while not considering the wide variety of other forces a vehicle can encounter. So many of these vehicles have extremely thin A-pillars because that simply is never tested in standard tests. On the other hand it seems like these rear crash bars on trucks need significant improvements. There's so much space and weight that can be used to create a much safer crumple zone and dissipate energy
Brilliant test, I hope you can continue to innovate in safety testing (highway speed crashes like 120 km/h would be very interesting because most of our miles are driven at highway speed). Can you also test the Tesla Model Y (best selling car in the world in 2023) and the Toyota RAV4 and Corolla (former best selling vehicle) against the 40-ton truck?
it is not passenger cars that must be developed to be safer, but the REAR of the truck must be FULL to the bottom, there should be no iron bars hanging behind the truck which can be a source of problems. I don't know what the government and TRUCK and trailer developers are thinking. Why not make a regulation so that the rear of the truck must be full to the bottom so that it is safe for other drivers.
If they lower the trailer they also have to lower the truck so the truck can tow it.But the problem is that if they lower everything the truck has to be smaller and the wheels too.If the truck is small it has less power but since it also has smaller tyres it has less grip
Thanks for your immens efforts!! The amount of preparation works is insane. Probably a few months of work. The main conclusion is clear, very few cars can withstand such rear-ending of a truck. It will make manufacturers have to improve crash absorption and A-pillar designs...
I will never expect would end up in this Chinese car crash video, anyway this is awesome i don't think ncap would even make this kind of video great work my man 😂🙏
For those in the US, the IIHS has done this test back in 2013 showing only 1 underride (at that time) passed for cars to "safely" crash in to. In 2017 companies have improved. Links below: th-cam.com/video/C3MPKLy9qHU/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/-VucNLZIsIU/w-d-xo.html
And this is why emergency break assist is now common to new vehicles, the car will determine to break in the unsafe distance from a truck cutting/taking your lane in a highway or street
Amazing test thank you for taking the time doing it! Drivers around the world thank you for the time and effort and attention to detail. If you do another round of testing, can you please test the Polestar 2, Polestar 4, BYD seal, BYD Sealion 07, BMW 3 series, Telsa model Y, Zeekr X, Zeekr 7X, Xpeng G6 🙏
I agree that the vehicles should be made stronger, but the traliers should also be made stronger, so both safety additions will be able to work together.
THIS IS THE BEST CRASH TEST I EVER SEEN THANKS FROM TURKEY ISTANBUL. ALSO COULD YOU TEST OUR FIRST TURKISH ELECTRIC CAR TOGG WE ALL WANT TO KNOW HOW IS SAFE.
Pushing passenger car manufactures to make the cars safer for such kind of collisions is surelly OK, but this will take some time. But XXX million vehicles in production or already produced and driven cannot be (post) optimsed / reworked. So what about to focus on the trailers? They could be possible optimised / and successively reworked to provide better deformation (crumple) zones.
Merci pour ce travail énorme ! J'ai la confirmation que d'avoir deux model 3 comme voiture à la maison me donne un maximum de chance en cas d'accident. bonjour de France !
Incredible!!! Brilliant and insightful video - Im struggling to see which cars where the winner , Tesla model 3 seemed to have faired well, i wonder how different the model Y would be or the X and S ?
Truck under- run protection is totally inadequate - nothing to do with the car's integrity. Energy absorbing areas to the rear and sides of trucks would mitigate any damage - it is not a car problem.
As Model 3 showed good result, it would have been better with Model Y test. I feel vehicle’s height is key correlation factor - most top performers are non-SUVs.
@@gamingmedia4088model 3 just went under, this test is a joke. If the trailer was lower tesla will have no roof and range rover would not even go under. all trailers have different height, so they should have changed the height for each car
@@pashabiceps95 this test is not a joke, because in china many trucks have this type of trailer. If you would lower the trailer it wouldnt be realistic. And other cars just went under too, but got way more damage. I think ur just a tesla hater or have low iq
THAT is the most spectacular crash test procedure I've EVER watched!
Thank you very much for those absolutely amazing results!
Follow us to get more amazing contents hhh
Very rich automotive media company in China. It can perform mega crash test.
Awesome 🎉🎉🎉 I buy benz G today 🎉🎉
Wow i buy model 3 now let’s go elon 🎉🎉🎉
I’m laoban i dont wanna ride in range rover
this is by far the most spectacular crash test ever made
In disbelieve that I am watching this for free, it almost feels illegal. Phenomenal production quality to say the least.
If Range Rover was already a no-no… After watching this it’s a so very NO NO
I think the real problem here is your bank account 🗣️💋
@ naaahh, I find them too flashy and useless for the city and no need to talk about the unreliability since they’re in hands of TATA.
spotted the gold digger
@@peterpanda1970 have u ever owned one? If so, say some unreliability problems u had 😍
@@no-damn-alias who? Lol
Range Rover with Tata level of safety, Good job!
Not surprising, Tata owns Range Rover.
Not as bad as Zeeker, they own Volvo and still perform poorly.
@@arapaimagold8088how much a range rover, and how much a zeekr, you should be ashame comparing those😅
@@nsglcckLol😂😂😂😂 Asper your knowledge Lamborghini is a German car
@@nsglcckdon’t you say.
You should definitely have a dubbed translation because the tests you do have a global interest.
Or subs available in 10-20 most spoken languages.
Canadian viewer here and I’m so glad that this footage is available. Thank you for performing these tests!
Superb "real world" test. Applaud the Bravery of DCAR to take on this challenge! No doubt making some strong angry management at the Auto Companies around the world,
我听到了不少关于这个测试有疑问的声音，但是我很感谢有人来做这个测试。 的确这种测试的初衷是为了卡车后架的安全设定标准， 但是在这个时间节点上，除非绝大多数的卡车已经安装了安全后架， 否则这就是一个很现实的场景。 我也期望测试项目未来也会与时俱进， 和未来公路场景保持强关联性。
法規問題而已 小車加強結構跟本沒用成本太高
最便宜就是從大車那改
@zoz1679 谁都知道如何做最经济，但是区别是你无法掌控所有因素。
@@ghunterforever
修法大車防護裝置 檢驗是否合格
如果檢驗不合格要重罰
甚至造成死亡需承擔刑責
中國大陸的卡車安全後架基本聊勝於無
所有的标准碰撞测试都是让不同的车尽量撞击车身同一个部位来做对比，只有它这个测试让不同车撞不同的部位，那还有啥公平可言
Best crash test ever. Interesting to see how for 50 years they been trying to get a "safer" trailer on the road , but changes are few and far between.
China is not joking. What China achieved in last 30 years is more than amazing.
Appreciate！I believe that China would achieve more in the future.
Really would like to see a model y with its panoramic roof and no pillar in the middle
This needs to go viral asap so manufacturers start properly engineering and accounting for truck collisions!
nothing to do with regulations whatsoever - you need to contact your legislature in your country
Oh man, this is the most expensive crash test in one video i've ever seen...
Thumbs up ❤
IHS has some strong competition. Wow this channel did amazing work! 10/10 quality video
Tesla and Volvo are the safest, but the Xiaomi also held up better than I expected. Very well done video!
this is the most successfull crash test on the internet ever.
It seems the conclusion of this test is that if big trucks and passenger cars have to share the same roads a redesign or reinforcement of the rear crash structure on large trucks to work with passengers cars would be easier than to redesign all passenger cars?
It probably be correct
@@DCARSTUDIO哈哈哈看的出来还是中国人回复的评论， 真的很希望你们可以在外网创出一片天， 如果是能够在有英语字幕的基础上加入英语配音应该会让更多的观众愿意看完。 这种事情找口语好点的留学生或者AI都可以做到的。 还有油管西班牙语的市场也很大， 可是适度的考虑一下
Perhaps a curved structure to deflect cars away from the truck
@@older12000or may be a rearward protruding energy absorbing bumper which will give space and energy absorption before A pillar hits to rigid corner of the truck
@@TANOCA17 commercial vehicles, even some containers, may need to back up to a dock to unload. This means that the back must be vertically flat and cannot have any reactive features of their own.
虽然我认为这次测试对suv很吃亏，但是这测试还是非常有意义的。
The Maybach/S class B pillar survived because it was so long the front crash structure struck the rear wheels of the trailer before the B-pillar could come into contact with the trailer (which in the real world may be a factor, but is not indicative of the strength of the B-pillar).
The front half of the Maybach is the same length as a regular S class. They could’ve saved money and bought one and got the same results
All cars hit those wheels before B pillar.
Bro the Tesla Model 3 held up way better than I expected wow. 😶
Apparently, the truck is the safest. Conclusion: we should all buy and drive a truck
Your ideas are very different
Driving a Tesla Model 3, I feel very safe now :D
Great testing, thanks from Germany!
這個測試演示出路上會遭遇到的真實狀況, 必須給推. 當瑞典在1970年代可因當地路況推出麋鹿測試時, 2020年代為什麼不能因應城際間交通運輸需求而做出卡車後方追撞試驗, 讓汽車製造商能更有精進的空間呢？
因為要改的應該是大貨車的防撞梁 而不是靠小車的A柱去扛
以前美國iihs也有做過相關試驗 可以去查查看 以結果來看也幫助美國卡車的防撞梁有更好的設計
We should note that the support rigidity on both sides of the truck's rear anti-collision beam is obviously insufficient. When it collides with the vehicle behind it, it breaks directly without absorbing enough impact kinetic energy. As a result, the rear A-pillar was inserted directly into the truck chassis. The engine compartment of the rear car was not fully folded to absorb the impact energy. So truck rear bumper regulations must be changed.
AGREE
probable yes
well, that's the reality for people outside the US. underride safety is not strict in some Asian countries (China, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc) unlike in the US which is really strict, its pretty common sight of trucks or trailers that dont have an underride guard at all.
IIHS did a demonstration on this a long time ago but I don't think there was a government mandate, so many trailers may still have this sort of rear crash guard.
@@hyrenaj2888 Since IIHS test bunch of underride guards, the trailer manufacturer make the guard stronger so it passed IIHS test. IIHS publicly shared the result so the manufacturer can feel ashamed about the results and yes they did feel ashamed so they made the guard stronger.
But here in asia, none of those happen. If you rear end a trailer in the US, i think you will have a chance to survive, but in here you will hit straight to heaven 😶
International viewer here - probably the most real world style of crash is this - going full speed into a truck at night ..never expected some of these models to fail like this
Good job guys! Best crash test that ive seen! Will you do more crash tests with cars like Lexus, Toyota Land Cruiser 200 or Prado, Acura, Audi and etc? Your test are best and all information are given.
Man that Model 3 is built like a rock! Tesla as always does really well.
safest cars on the road
This video is excellent, the testing facility looks amazing too
thanks for your liking. follow us and get more
Thanks for this, and adding english subtitles. This was really cool.
Very valuable test. Hopefully, manufacturers will improve their products for this type of crash.
hope so
Xiaomi su7 did quite well for a new car company
That one surprised me the most. I knew Tesla would win because they have been good at structural strength for years but to see a new car company performing that well in remarkable
I find it very nice and efficient from the car crash company and you guys that you respect every car brand aswell as you see them all in a neutral perspective. 🎉
Thank you so much for performing this kind of crash test.
So know we all know that, the most fragile part of car structure is in A-B pillar and front beam of the roof. When the pillars and beam collapses, it will directly hit our head and causing fatal death. That is really concerning.
I think manufacturers must find a solution and do internal test like this immediately. This kind of test should be standard in the world.
This is what the auto industry needs. Usually i tend to hate on the Chinese automotive industry due to their poorly designed and built cars. But this is just next level. This should be a standard test for all cars. Congratulations
They’re definitely improving and very impressive considering how they already almost leveled themselves with brands of other countries that’s been around for much longer
You've done an amazing job with this video! The dedication to providing us with such detailed and informative content is truly commendable. Keep up the fantastic work, it's clear that a lot of time, effort, and money goes into making your channel so educational and entertaining.
Thank you for your follow and likes, we will have more test videos in the future
Don't block TH-cam's Automatic Captions feature.
as a BeamNG Drive player I really enjoy this content
整個測試感覺已經不是在測試轎車了，
感覺都是在證明，卡車的後防護欄法規有問題，
後防護欄根本都沒有任何潰縮吸能作用，所有的力都是板台跟貨櫃在承受。
希望下次两会将有人跟习提这件事~
@@rickfeng4466那小學生會理會這些事？想多了
习不管这个，这个是交通部的职责@@rickfeng4466
@@why886 朋友，你家乡的大卡车后方有很多气囊是吗？
视频中卡车后杠是用的美规
I can only imagine how expensive these tests must have been. Who sponsors you?
Chinese car insurance companies
@BorisG491 Ah...okay, like the IIHS in the USA.
They are an independent automotive media company, backed by ByteDance (the company behind TikTok)
Usa and Europe can't make this test 😂😂
@@veronveron25 They have similar test 'overlap' ' obique overlap' , but not against a Lorry Trailer
Great video and kudos on the effort.both the tests and the video production !! Given most new cars have AEB , how’s that factored into the test ? Do you turn it off ? Maybe AEB systems mean structures can be made lighter and as a consequence weaker ..as they are not expecting to run into the back of a truck like this ? Or at the very least not without a level of braking and all safety systems at high alert ?
Bravo for creating this crash test. the world needs to know this information.
This is a side effect of manufacturers designing cars to excel in very specific crash tests while not considering the wide variety of other forces a vehicle can encounter. So many of these vehicles have extremely thin A-pillars because that simply is never tested in standard tests.
On the other hand it seems like these rear crash bars on trucks need significant improvements. There's so much space and weight that can be used to create a much safer crumple zone and dissipate energy
Spektakuler.. best video i ever watch. Respect from Indonesia
Wow, I am impressed with these videos! you are raising the bar like the IIHS did back in the day
Wow, the (video) production quality is Epic! Unbeliveable content, max respect! Keep up the great work.
Brilliant test, I hope you can continue to innovate in safety testing (highway speed crashes like 120 km/h would be very interesting because most of our miles are driven at highway speed). Can you also test the Tesla Model Y (best selling car in the world in 2023) and the Toyota RAV4 and Corolla (former best selling vehicle) against the 40-ton truck?
good opinion
it is not passenger cars that must be developed to be safer, but the REAR of the truck must be FULL to the bottom, there should be no iron bars hanging behind the truck which can be a source of problems.
I don't know what the government and TRUCK and trailer developers are thinking. Why not make a regulation so that the rear of the truck must be full to the bottom so that it is safe for other drivers.
A pillar should hold up much better. They can do it in rally cars so why not here.
If they lower the trailer they also have to lower the truck so the truck can tow it.But the problem is that if they lower everything the truck has to be smaller and the wheels too.If the truck is small it has less power but since it also has smaller tyres it has less grip
Good job and information! Please do the same crash test on the volvo XC90. Thanks
Thank you for performing these tests,
😄
Thanks for your immens efforts!! The amount of preparation works is insane. Probably a few months of work. The main conclusion is clear, very few cars can withstand such rear-ending of a truck. It will make manufacturers have to improve crash absorption and A-pillar designs...
This test took nearly a year from preparation to completio. But we are very happy to receive everyone's like
I will never expect would end up in this Chinese car crash video, anyway this is awesome i don't think ncap would even make this kind of video great work my man 😂🙏
N.America has similar test 'overlap' ' obique overlap' , but not against Lorry Trailer
The IIHS had underride tests but not NCAP
Amazing production and good precision in terms of crashing these cars. Best regards from Germany.
For those in the US, the IIHS has done this test back in 2013 showing only 1 underride (at that time) passed for cars to "safely" crash in to. In 2017 companies have improved. Links below:
th-cam.com/video/C3MPKLy9qHU/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/-VucNLZIsIU/w-d-xo.html
And this is why emergency break assist is now common to new vehicles, the car will determine to break in the unsafe distance from a truck cutting/taking your lane in a highway or street
Amazing test thank you for taking the time doing it! Drivers around the world thank you for the time and effort and attention to detail. If you do another round of testing, can you please test the Polestar 2, Polestar 4, BYD seal, BYD Sealion 07, BMW 3 series, Telsa model Y, Zeekr X, Zeekr 7X, Xpeng G6 🙏
I’m so glad these tests are being carried out. Thank you for highlighting 🙏
I agree that the vehicles should be made stronger, but the traliers should also be made stronger, so both safety additions will be able to work together.
THIS IS THE BEST CRASH TEST I EVER SEEN THANKS FROM TURKEY ISTANBUL. ALSO COULD YOU TEST OUR FIRST TURKISH ELECTRIC CAR TOGG WE ALL WANT TO KNOW HOW IS SAFE.
togg 10x 在中国境内不销售，所以没有测试的必要性。这个测试方主要是面相中国境内观众的。
Where I can find the list with the best and worst cars? On which site?
TNCAP 什么时候能跟上中国撞击测试
新鮮， 有趣，知識性齊集一身，感謝出品人下血本
great video but how did they managed to get these cars
自己去4s店购买的
直接購買，不同擔心錢的問題，這一家媒體由TIKTOK100%擁有
Tesla and Volvo safest
Actual real life scenario test, well done!
high budget test, good production!
How do you purchase so much cars but manage to get only 10,000 views? underrated
This is a very influenced Media in China and got tens of millions of views in their platform. (can not get access to TH-cam)
The dummies are much more expensive than cars....
Because this channel is owned by ByteDance, the TikTok company.
@@gseekerI just realized that. They can cost from 10,000$ up to 100,000$. Crazily expensive
中国境内最大汽车自媒体，不差钱，不用担心他们的钱袋子😂。他们推下山坡做翻滚测试的新车也不少😂
Thank you for this video. I think truck undercarriage protection is also rather lacking here in Malaysia, not enough testing as well.
when will see the tests for the Cybertruck?
Pushing passenger car manufactures to make the cars safer for such kind of collisions is surelly OK, but
this will take some time. But XXX million vehicles in production or already produced and driven cannot be (post) optimsed / reworked.
So what about to focus on the trailers? They could be possible optimised / and successively reworked to provide
better deformation (crumple) zones.
So many different cars! Great test.
Thanks for like
Es tal vez la mejor prueba real que he visto. Gracias
Merci pour ce travail énorme !
J'ai la confirmation que d'avoir deux model 3 comme voiture à la maison me donne un maximum de chance en cas d'accident.
bonjour de France !
wow！Thats a real case to support that Model 3 is truly safe
@@DCARSTUDIO终于有英文字幕了.. 想要粉丝和流量建议配音也做多国语言支持
@@illlillliiiiiliil 这位是法语 😂
@@xiaoteam575 没明白你想说什么
Really impressive! makes one rethink when buying and driving a car.
yep! We want help the consumers
Incredible!!! Brilliant and insightful video - Im struggling to see which cars where the winner , Tesla model 3 seemed to have faired well, i wonder how different the model Y would be or the X and S ?
Elantra, Model 3, Xiaomi SU7 and Volvo S60 were the strongest cars
elantra在中国只卖12000美元，能有这成绩很不错了。@@hewe
Extremely impressive content, thank you.
Why am I not surprised the S60 scores so well even in this absolutely horrific scenario?
I love Haval Dargo, Grand High Quality! ❣️❤️
0:50 what an Editing 🤯
Exelente test desde chile espectacular realmente
Brilliant production! Congratulations!
說真的~
這種撞法根本不是測30%撞擊了，根本就是在撞A柱跟誰的底盤低，
拿超跑或超低車高的車來撞反而會贏轎車呢。
這種撞法要贏，只有卡車在後輪後方裝上跟轎車吸能區一樣高的吸能縱梁才能保護轎車，
加裝的吸能縱梁根部需與板台縱梁相連接，強度也要與板台縱梁相當，並且向後延伸一段後，
安裝吸能盒，才能讓轎車的吸能機構可以與貨車有效相對撞擊，避免轎車Ａ柱直接撞擊貨車板台，侵入座艙。
如果把轎車的Ａ柱一昧地加強到撞不爛，反而會造成正常碰撞時，
慣性力無處分散。
Waiting for Model Y, Haval SUV, Cherry SUV
This is amazing!
Thanks a lot
can i see more of japanese car test??
great test, thank you for sharing. timestamps for each model would be a nice option too.
thanks for like and the advice
SUPER TEST!
NEED CRUSH LIXIANG L9 AND Huawei Aito M9
th-cam.com/video/zRPe8d-mlD4/w-d-xo.html
I hope xiaomi car don't get downgrade quality when export.
Wow! Great content!
A dream doesn’t become reality through magic; it takes sweat, determination and hard work.
Truck under- run protection is totally inadequate - nothing to do with the car's integrity. Energy absorbing areas to the rear and sides of trucks would mitigate any damage - it is not a car problem.
Just make the bar for the truck stronger? Under-ride bars are the problems
Top notch production quality
As Model 3 showed good result, it would have been better with Model Y test. I feel vehicle’s height is key correlation factor - most top performers are non-SUVs.
The governments need to regulate the standard of truck pretection bar to make it more safe for the smaller cars.
Wow. Fantastic reporting. This is fascinating to watch
Very interesting test. What this proves mostly is how poor that under-ride protection is.
This expensive test makes no sense. Pillar A can't absorb all the energy, the problem is the trailer, in Europe they are designed better.
Europe is tge whole wprld 🤡 and they sell these abominations worldwide
This ain't for Europe and A pillar should always be intact even if it can't absorb impact
it can, look at the model 3
@@gamingmedia4088model 3 just went under, this test is a joke. If the trailer was lower tesla will have no roof and range rover would not even go under. all trailers have different height, so they should have changed the height for each car
@@pashabiceps95 this test is not a joke, because in china many trucks have this type of trailer. If you would lower the trailer it wouldnt be realistic. And other cars just went under too, but got way more damage. I think ur just a tesla hater or have low iq
dang, how you guys can have a LOT of those car ranging from dirt cheap to freaking expensive for this crash test
這家汽車媒體由tiktok全資擁有
@JimLiu-sq4dy ah, i see that's why they got money