I have a book for sale, it has 31 chapters of most everything I have done for past 25 years making free energy stuff. Here is link to a video scrolling through the chapters of the book: th-cam.com/video/zpKsM_axd6k/w-d-xo.html If you would like to buy my book: Send $50 via paypal using this link: paypal.me/DKonzen Also send me an email too at: konehead@msn.com I will then send you the link to the book, and also the password to access it THANKS!
Hi Paul Power factor I know all about, I use scope to test that out and can see for sure accuratly what the phase shift is (you want near 90 degrees) I have some video in past testing the power factor of rotovertor with scope. However I have found its good when connecting to grid, its possible to get zero watts input with 9o00 degree phase shift, but when using an invertor, power factor gets trashed completely and right now I am using invertor to loop it....basically what I am doing now is testing under a looped condition....and if super cap and battery working as voltage-filter keep their charge while in looped condition , then thats all good
Hi Kone. Nice work. Have you thought about trying to loop without the invertor. For example using another storage mechanism like inductive/capacative elements or another motor? Interesting to think about, at least.
Thats why I put that dual disc alternator on the shaft - an "inductive element" haha One guy in Canada named Tom McKay looped two rotovertors, both having their run cap power being tapped out and running a 24VDC invertor that spun the motors, not an alternator on shaft but another motor so "rotary transformers" X 2 Hector says there are 16 different ways to loop the rotovertor, this simple run cap into invertor just one of them.
Ever tried making a core-type transformer with special configuration? Both of the direction of the windings are in the same direction. An extra winding is wound around both of the windings, such that the extra winding envelops both the windings like an O instead of an 8.
Hi Lukie I have made motor coils in some of my NN coil "konehead motors" that would have for example a fairly long core maybe four inches long and half inch thick (example) the core of ferrite or iron or best probably would be laminate transformer steel... Then I wind a motor coil over say one inch of one end of the four inch long core, This motor coil would be the primary...it gets pulsed with some power....the secondary would be wound all the way back behind the motor coil, three inches long, and also over the top of the motor coil too so I think this similar to what you are thinking....Anyways it works good as nothing "wasted" behind the motor coil (lots of flux back there) and it can all be collected put into caps or wherever.
Hi Lukie I have discovered that the method of connecting transformers no matter their design such as bitorroid has their "performance" be mostly a matter of "vectored" (primary in series with tuning cap) if some sort of over unity condition can be "maintained" example is the rotary transformer phase of the rotovertor which is a transformer, but a rotary one...I will suspect the transformers you mention like the Frolov and others also require the vectored method of *transforming" power
you need to be aware that as you put load on the output of your transformer the voltage will drop. the power output will be equal to the amperage multiplied by the voltage measured while under load
Yes, I understand thanks....just trying to keep it under 16VDC in the "end product," of what the invertor sees. Right now its a little dangerous since if battery removed it stops working like a voltage limiter and invertor will fry from anything over 16VDC
Hi Paul From the run cap phase? Not sure not really doing that, although have done it alot with the alternator being spun to find watts output. From the run cap phase, "resistance" kills it and so taking it out with the series transformer and the resistance is the invertor and the supbe ercaps and battery....sorry I have not looked much into just a lumped resistive load on the run cap phase but I know what will happen - it will make the draw go way up to motor and everything worthless, as no gain, however I should be checking that out on the ouput that is going to hit the invertor and the super cap however not sure the "ohms equivalent" of the invertor as it is some sort of inductive (and capacitive) load so dont think a lump resistive load will be a good equivalent, and so just testing in "looped mode" right now but your are right I should find the best resistive load value on output of the series transformer at least know what it is might come in handy figuring stuff out in future.
Do you mean Tesla liked to run his generators with his motors? (3ph AC induction motor run in single phase input and third phase "rotary transformer that supplies power via aeries transformer through primary)
@@koneheadx all is quite clear described in his patents and, yes he says in patent description he prefers to use all his motors directly from generator.
Hi Tachyon I will not know until I try it but seems the load of invertor (which powers the motor, and the invertor powered from the DC of the FWBR) will be what "replaces" the actual shorting out of the coils with ammeter. This was working before, I just had too much DC voltage being "forced" into the load of the invertor. Note there are already two transformers! First is the run cap phase of the RV motor which is a "rotary transformer" Main effect I want to see is that good power out of the transformer, while the draw to the rotovertor barely goes up, or goes down, or stays the same....I will try it with just one series transformer as shown in video , if no-go then will add a 1 to 1 transformer and/or a choke too with reverse diode... Thanks!
Hi Tachyoncatch Tnanks for warning - I had a little time today to test and put the FWBR made from the 600V 15A diodes I linked in previous video on output from that transformerand it really sucked! the output in amps into cap bank and batteries went way way down to only 10ma or so as the FWBR just killed it. I will try some other diodes and other FWBRs and other stuff too (like another trasnformer on it like you suggest)
@@MrDKONZEN I can't go into detail here (I tried and the post went poof). Use the original transformer, then connect a second step down to get the output voltage you want. Then rectify. The good stuf is happening in the first vectored trans and any resistive load on the secondary of that trans will kill the good stuf. So, no semiconductors on the first trans.
The rotoverter is setting up the magnetic environment for the vectored trans. The rotoverter is generating nothing. The mistake in thinking that most that experiment with the rotoverter, is that it is generating.
@@Tachyoncatcher HI Tachyoncatch I saw your post from a few days ago, about adding second transformer, and did some experiments yesterday but could not get it to work right not to say I did anything how it should be - just having the second transformer vectored or in parallel was the first experiments (no deicsion made which is way to do it from what I did) Also went through a few different transformers,....just had an unlucky day mostly but I am taking what you say to do to heart as got near same advice from Hector too. Thanks
I have a book for sale, it has 31 chapters of most everything I have done for past 25 years making free energy stuff. Here is link to a video scrolling through the chapters of the book: th-cam.com/video/zpKsM_axd6k/w-d-xo.html
If you would like to buy my book: Send $50 via paypal using this link: paypal.me/DKonzen Also send me an email too at: konehead@msn.com
I will then send you the link to the book, and also the password to access it THANKS!
For accuracy, on input, you need a power monitor that displays apparent and real power, and power factor
Hi Paul
Power factor I know all about, I use scope to test that out and can see for sure accuratly what the phase shift is (you want near 90 degrees) I have some video in past testing the power factor of rotovertor with scope.
However I have found its good when connecting to grid, its possible to get zero watts input with 9o00 degree phase shift, but when using an invertor, power factor gets trashed completely and right now I am using invertor to loop it....basically what I am doing now is testing under a looped condition....and if super cap and battery working as voltage-filter keep their charge while in looped condition , then thats all good
Hi Kone. Nice work. Have you thought about trying to loop without the invertor. For example using another storage mechanism like inductive/capacative elements or another motor? Interesting to think about, at least.
Thats why I put that dual disc alternator on the shaft - an "inductive element" haha
One guy in Canada named Tom McKay looped two rotovertors, both having their run cap power being tapped out and running a 24VDC invertor that spun the motors, not an alternator on shaft but another motor so "rotary transformers" X 2
Hector says there are 16 different ways to loop the rotovertor, this simple run cap into invertor just one of them.
Ever tried making a core-type transformer with special configuration?
Both of the direction of the windings are in the same direction. An extra winding is wound around both of the windings, such that the extra winding envelops both the windings like an O instead of an 8.
Hi Lukie
I have made motor coils in some of my NN coil "konehead motors" that would have for example a fairly long core maybe four inches long and half inch thick (example) the core of ferrite or iron or best probably would be laminate transformer steel...
Then I wind a motor coil over say one inch of one end of the four inch long core, This motor coil would be the primary...it gets pulsed with some power....the secondary would be wound all the way back behind the motor coil, three inches long, and also over the top of the motor coil too so I think this similar to what you are thinking....Anyways it works good as nothing "wasted" behind the motor coil (lots of flux back there) and it can all be collected put into caps or wherever.
@@MrDKONZEN Like the frolov transformer / Markov transformer / bi toroid transformer / split flux transformer? (All the same principle anyway)
Hi Lukie
I have discovered that the method of connecting transformers no matter their design such as bitorroid has their "performance" be mostly a matter of "vectored" (primary in series with tuning cap) if some sort of over unity condition can be "maintained" example is the rotary transformer phase of the rotovertor which is a transformer, but a rotary one...I will suspect the transformers you mention like the Frolov and others also require the vectored method of *transforming" power
At 55 Seconds I meant transformer not a cap
And at 7:04 I meant ammeter not voltmeter
you need to be aware that as you put load on the output of your transformer the voltage will drop.
the power output will be equal to the amperage multiplied by the voltage measured while under load
Yes, I understand thanks....just trying to keep it under 16VDC in the "end product," of what the invertor sees. Right now its a little dangerous since if battery removed it stops working like a voltage limiter and invertor will fry from anything over 16VDC
What is the voltage drop across a resistive load?
Hi Paul
From the run cap phase? Not sure not really doing that, although have done it alot with the alternator being spun to find watts output.
From the run cap phase, "resistance" kills it and so taking it out with the series transformer and the resistance is the invertor and the supbe ercaps and battery....sorry I have not looked much into just a lumped resistive load on the run cap phase but I know what will happen - it will make the draw go way up to motor and everything worthless, as no gain, however I should be checking that out on the ouput that is going to hit the invertor and the super cap however not sure the "ohms equivalent" of the invertor as it is some sort of inductive (and capacitive) load so dont think a lump resistive load will be a good equivalent, and so just testing in "looped mode" right now but your are right I should find the best resistive load value on output of the series transformer at least know what it is might come in handy figuring stuff out in future.
This is why Tesla always preferred to run his motors direct from generators.
Do you mean Tesla liked to run his generators with his motors? (3ph AC induction motor run in single phase input and third phase "rotary transformer that supplies power via aeries transformer through primary)
@@koneheadx all is quite clear described in his patents and, yes he says in patent description he prefers to use all his motors directly from generator.
👍
Doug, a FWBR will kill the effect. Use a second transformer, then a FWBR on the secondary of the second transformer.
Hi Tachyon
I will not know until I try it but seems the load of invertor (which powers the motor, and the invertor powered from the DC of the FWBR) will be what "replaces" the actual shorting out of the coils with ammeter.
This was working before, I just had too much DC voltage being "forced" into the load of the invertor.
Note there are already two transformers!
First is the run cap phase of the RV motor which is a "rotary transformer"
Main effect I want to see is that good power out of the transformer, while the draw to the rotovertor barely goes up, or goes down, or stays the same....I will try it with just one series transformer as shown in video , if no-go then will add a 1 to 1 transformer and/or a choke too with reverse diode...
Thanks!
Hi Tachyoncatch
Tnanks for warning - I had a little time today to test and put the FWBR made from the 600V 15A diodes I linked in previous video on output from that transformerand it really sucked!
the output in amps into cap bank and batteries went way way down to only 10ma or so as the FWBR just killed it.
I will try some other diodes and other FWBRs and other stuff too (like another trasnformer on it like you suggest)
@@MrDKONZEN I can't go into detail here (I tried and the post went poof). Use the original transformer, then connect a second step down to get the output voltage you want. Then rectify. The good stuf is happening in the first vectored trans and any resistive load on the secondary of that trans will kill the good stuf. So, no semiconductors on the first trans.
The rotoverter is setting up the magnetic environment for the vectored trans. The rotoverter is generating nothing. The mistake in thinking that most that experiment with the rotoverter, is that it is generating.
@@Tachyoncatcher HI Tachyoncatch
I saw your post from a few days ago, about adding second transformer, and did some experiments yesterday but could not get it to work right not to say I did anything how it should be - just having the second transformer vectored or in parallel was the first experiments (no deicsion made which is way to do it from what I did) Also went through a few different transformers,....just had an unlucky day mostly but I am taking what you say to do to heart as got near same advice from Hector too.
Thanks