which one has more potential to cause social conflict between counterculture implications and or assimilation. Is it necessary to participate in the rule of law to prevent the conflict? which one can be assumed to have more impact on cultural resilience as an institution as a result of the implementation of the rule of law? thanks prof. debra
Watang, your questions are more theoretical than practical. Both counterculture and assimilation can be conflict makers. Countercultures are (by definition) designed to disrupt and cause conflict while assimilation may not necessarily have a primary purpose to cause disruption or change (but does cause change nonetheless). I hope this gives you a starting point.
which one has more potential to cause social conflict between counterculture implications and or assimilation. Is it necessary to participate in the rule of law to prevent the conflict? which one can be assumed to have more impact on cultural resilience as an institution as a result of the implementation of the rule of law? thanks prof. debra
Watang, your questions are more theoretical than practical. Both counterculture and assimilation can be conflict makers. Countercultures are (by definition) designed to disrupt and cause conflict while assimilation may not necessarily have a primary purpose to cause disruption or change (but does cause change nonetheless). I hope this gives you a starting point.