NP-Completeness | Richard Karp and Lex Fridman

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 11

  • @fourhourlife8594
    @fourhourlife8594 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have a complexity and computability exam in about 2 hours. Let's get it!

  • @lacasadeacero
    @lacasadeacero 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have understood the idea is get a problem of complexity 2^n and solve it in n^k by other way. So i focus my time in rewrite a n^k problem in log(n) complexity. Of course if thats true i can solve 3-sat. But is weird the fact that 3-sat requires for me a continous model. Instead of a logical discrete model. So i think intuitively 3-sat is solvable but the model that solve the problem is always different and unique depending of the question and not an universal model. Becouse if the model was the same i could prove p=np

  • @samirshehadeh4739
    @samirshehadeh4739 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Algorithmic complexity and computability II exam in 90 min let's gooooooo

  • @lashropa
    @lashropa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Riveting. Absolutely riveting.

    • @codycast
      @codycast ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol. Absolute snooze fest.

  • @rinjuxe56
    @rinjuxe56 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's still pending in 2 yrs

  • @admarquis
    @admarquis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    AND is the product and XOR is the mod2 addition, not OR. It's the Algebra of Boole, the real one.
    Logic has been canonically solved by Norman J. Wildberger, njwildberger on TH-cam. He solved mechanically Propositional Logic. Have a look at his recent videos, his Boole-Mobius transform gives you a truth table instantly, he also solves the SAT problem beautifully. Its a shame nobody saw it before him 😊🙋‍♂️

  • @gonzales420
    @gonzales420 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    to be or not to be