Algebraic Topology 14: Exact Sequences & Homology of Spheres
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024
- Playlist: • Algebraic Topology
We introduce exact sequences and a particular long exact sequence on the (reduced) homology groups for a subspace A of the space X and its quotient X/A. Then we use this to calculate the (singular) homology of the spheres S^n. We also discuss the homology of the suspension SX of a space X and give a topological proof of Brouwer's fixed point theorem.
Presented by Anthony Bosman, PhD.
Learn more about math at Andrews University: www.andrews.ed...
In this course we are following Hatcher, Algebraic Topology: pi.math.cornel...
0:00 Recap on homology of spheres
04:15 Motivating reduced homology
05:45 Defining reduced homology
Note: You can also define reduced homology with the augmentation map from the 0-chain group to Z, which takes all chains to the sum of the coefficients of the simplices. Then the homology of this new chain complex is the reduced homology.
07:10 Reduced homology for contractible spaces
09:00 Introducing exact sequences
13:00 Properties of exact sequences
18:50 Examples of exact sequences
21:20 Motivation for exact sequences by stating a theorem: the singular homology groups of a subspace A in a space X and the quotient by that subspace X/A form a long exact sequence
26:00 Using this theorem to prove that the singular homology of spheres is what we expect it to be
35:00 Generalization of this method of calculating singular homology of spheres to more general spaces and topological cones and suspensions over them
43:05 Brouwer’s fixed-point theorem in n dimensions as a corollary of the singular homology of spheres
Thanks for sharing!
As always, thanks for the great lecture!! One thing that bothered me both with the original and this proof of Brouwer's fixed-point theorem is that there there wasn't any discussion about whether D^n is convex or not, but it was always drawn as such. In the case D^n isn't convex, couldn't there be multiple r(x) points on the boundary? (I guess that it's fine because D^n is homotopy equivalent to a convex space, but I'd expect a bit of discussion about that...?)
Recall D^n is defined to be the n-dimensional disk: the set of points of radius less than or equal to one from the origin in R^n. This is certainly convex!
Oh, I was thinking that the proof was more generally about spaces that are homeomorphic to D^n since this is a topology class, but I shouldn't assume things too much :)
Absolutely amazing
My novel!
I suppose this is not the last lecture for the serie? Will all lectures be uploaded and how many lectures in total?
nice🥰🥰🥰🥰