By popular demand: re-testing the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 'Art' Lens on a Canon EOS R7 (32.5mp)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ธ.ค. 2022
- Soo many requests to re-review this classic lens - time to listen to my viewers and get to work.
Find it here (Canon version) (Amazon Affiliate link - thanks for your support!):
geni.us/sigma1835f18canon
If you've found this or other videos I've made to be helpful, then support me on Patreon! www.patreon.com/christopherfr...
All pictures taken by me on my trusty (and slightly exhausted) Canon 60D.
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonEOSR5Body
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonEFtoRF
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma50mm14Art
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonRF35mm18Macro
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/MarumiFitSlim77
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020USBPlusMic
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSmartLavalierPlus
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC3MicAdaptor
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1nMiniRecorder
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMini2FlyMore
Music: 'Opportunity Walks' by Kevin Macleod (www.incompetech.com) - แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต
Please keep reviewing older canon EF lenses that needs updating! Us canon users don't have many lens options currently, so lenses like the Sigma Art EF lenses and stuff would be awesome for us!
I second this ✊🏽✊🏽✊🏽✊🏽
Christopher needs to review more Nikon F mount lenses too!
I don't use to comment on videos and the very few comments I made was to ask for this, some time ago. I was surprised and really happy when I saw this review as first recommended video! Thank you, Chris! And continue these amazing reviews (I watch every single one of them)! Cheers
My dude! Thanks 👍. I've been wanting this video for so long :)
Best lens reviews 👍👌🤘
For me and most people on youtube you are no.1
Great great job!!
Greetings from Slovenia 🇸🇮
I don't think I've ever bought a lens without first watching your reviews. You've done a landmark job of documenting lens performance, and saved a many of us a lot of work and frustration. Thank you.
One comment on this video, though: Unless two or more items in the image chain have nearly equal resolution, the end resolution of the system will be almost completely determined by the lowest resolution item in the chain. Camera lens>sensor>monitor screen>human eye, for example. If a lens provides excellent resolution at, for example, 20 Mpixels, putting the same lens on a 50 Mpixel camera cannot produce lower resolution.
So I think I disagree with your statement that your high resolution sensor degrades the sharpness of the lens.
yep, this lens is still great IMHO!
Exactly the review I was looking for. Thank you very much!! 👌😎
Huh, this was very well timed, Chris. I was just about to sell mine after moving to full-frame a year ago. In fact, I just rewatched your original review yesterday, and I did some test shots today. To be honest, I never understood why this lens was so hyped. It always looked kind of soft to me, even after I spent a whole day on calibrating the autofocus. In video, I always heard the focus motor, unless I used a lavalier microphone. In retrospect, part of my experience seems to be a consequence of mounting it on a 90D, which also has a 32.5MP sensor.
I agree. I’d love to see a new version for mirrorless cameras. I’d love this on the Fuji XH2S open gate.
Would be super nice for canon to open up for third party lenses. I believe one day sigma will manufacture a version for mirrorless, hopefully for all brands.
I would love to see a version 2 of this lens from Sigma
If Sigma made a mark ii for mirrorless, i'll not hesitate to buy it and continue using apsc
And the outgoing version actually has full frame coverage from 27 mm to 35 mm so I would really love to see an updated version that tries to see how much full frame coverage they can get across that entire range.
I’d buy an APSC camera from any brand if sigma release a Mk ii
@@portraitblake I know right!
i dunno why they haven't. for aps-c it's definitely doable, and Tamron released a 35-150 f2-2.8, f2 through 85, then 2.8 to 150... i guess folks wanna sell as many lesser lenses as they can before bringing out stuff that will kill sales of older designs.
I've had one of these sitting in my lens collection since it came out I originally used it on my 7D, Since then I moved to FF but still have my little M5, This lens combined with the Viltrox speed booster gives me a f1.2 18-35, I often consider selling it but it's such a great lens I can't bring myself to do it
Aaaah ! Finally now we have this review. Hats off to you Chris. However slightly disappointed with the sharpness of lens on R7. But at the end it is what it is. Please review R7 with the Sigma 50-100mm also some day.
Thanks a bunch. Highly appreciated. Love from India. TC
Nice review as always, I’m using it with my SD Quattro and Quattro H with their über demanding Foveon sensors and it’s razor sharp, guess at the time Sigma really optimized its design for those cameras.
Brilliant review as always! Thanks!
Thanks so much for retesting this lens on the R7.
Thanks for revisiting this one. Did get it for my 90D and also am still satisfied to is it on my R7, for Video. Have not found a good alternative yet to be honest, well, at least not for the price. Would love to see an update, but currently canon is blocking other companies for RF mount. Have a nice weekend, cheers.
I really miss mine. I sold it when I upgraded to full frame. Really wish I had kept it as it's still useful for crop video options or used on my M50 I picked up now.
Nice little sneaky photo of Korea at 4:45, I was there from August 29th to the 12th of October with the wife. Drove 4500km, Suwon, Jeonju, Busan, Sokcho, back over to Seoul and back home to Suwon. I took a nice 240mp pixel shift photo of Kaesong North Korea in the DMZ with my Riv haha.
Love your reviews as always Chris!
I still miss my howdy everyone :(
This is why Chris Frost is the one to listen to... because others have been praising this lens in very recent videos. For Canon R7 owners, these are setting people up to wash their money through the toilet. Thanks for the save, Chris. This is why I pay for your content, keep it up!
I’m awaiting delivery of this lens for my R7 so this video helps me ground-truth my expectations. I’ve only been exploring the mirrorless world for about 6 months so I think the user will be tested more than the lens in my case. Thanks for the in-depth review!
How is it working out?
Excellent video 😮!
Bought this lens during last year's Black Friday sale. The lens is a tank!
thank God you made it . Well done
Will be buying this in monthly payments soon, it'll be my first proper cine lens, glad to see it performs well!
On the tests, did you use electronic or mechanical shutter on the resolution charts? I notice some possible shutter shock at slower speeds with mechanical.
Thank you for all your thorough, well organized lens reviews, Chris, but this time it's not clear whether you recommend this lens for Canon r7 or not. I'm pretty satisfied with my Canon 17-55mm f2.8 and 70-200mm f4 is usm, both of which I think are less sharp than the Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 that you just reviewed. Am I wrong? Are there other parameters we should consider as well?
this is one of the most classic lenses i’ve never owned i recently had a videographer film something for me & he had this glued to a black magic camera the results were lovely ✨
I just got it and an R10 (R7 on back order). It's amazing.
@@derain95 damn makes me wanna go out & grab it 🔥 i’m not gone lie
@@SunnySoCal I can give you some uncompressed test pics/video if you want to be sure
@@derain95 It's beautiful on the R7, also. Tack sharp, autofocuses greatly, and with cLog3 it's perfect.
@@znub206 I hopefully get my R7 tomorrow, I grew up with a 500D so the improvements are a bit staggering. It will be interesting to feel the difference between the R7 and R10 compared to the leap from the 500D.
Legendary! It is IMHO simply still the best lens for APS-C sensors. And it's even better on the Canon R7 with IBIS.
Thank you Christopher!
Thanks for your lovely videos! I really appreciate your efforts to bring us so nice and standardised revies! Do these results concern also to canon eos 90d?
Seeing as the 90d has the same amount of megapixels and the same size sensor it definitely will
On one of the FB groups we had a few "h8a's" (perhaps trolls?) who were bashing everyone who uses it as a "noob". I will say that I'm not one to follow the crowd and don't just automatically like what everyone else does. But the appeal of this lens is undeniable. There's a reason for its popularity and I've seen some absolutely wonderful footage produced from this by folks who would NEVER be mistaken for "noobs"!!!
BTW Christopher Frost, I'm wearing my "The CHOSEN" hoodie today and actually bought it in Atlanta (4,500+ seat Fox Theater) at the premiere of season #3. I assume you've watched/promoted this show! It's an amazing evangelistic tool.
Great video as always Chris. Can you test this lens on the R5 or R5c for both photos and video? Would be interestinng to see the performance
I have this on my very outdated (now) canon 80d and this is the lens I use about 80% of the time!
Oh no! Don’t call it outdated! It’s still a wonderful camera! Just did a wedding with mine this summer! It made my career xD (super biased btw) ❤
uff, that's a bit sad, thou it will do great on older cameras i guess...
I hope canon finally opens up their mount, i want that lens on a mirrorless camera. Tamron and Sigma make so many interesting lenses.
Thanks for revisiting this lens, great to see where its limits are today!
Hi Christopher, have you tried this lens on the R5 at all in crop mode for stills and/or video?
This lens and my 70-200 2.8 III are my favorites!!
I have this lens on my Canon 90D. Previously had it on a 70D and it still
holds up as when got brand new years ago. Won’t ever get rid of it
Yesssss!!! Really waited for this but ended up grabbing a NikonF copy about 3 weeks ago for US$350
Could you also retest the 50-100mm F1.8?
I've owed this lens for 8 years now and will never get rid of it. Moved from Canon systems to Fuji and via the Fringer Pro adapter this works just perfectly, as well as native lenses, on my Fujifilm X-H2 with it's 40MP sensor. Yes, at 100% zoom you can see it's slightly softer than the very best of the best Fuji primes but the Sigma 18-35mm is still sharper than 99% of other lenses out there. It's incredible and always been known to compete with primes. More than capable for 4k/6k/8k video work. Buy it used and you won't be disappointed!
Hello there! I have been considering getting this Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 for my X-T5 with adapter for photography.
Perhaps do you have a gallery with sample images taken with your X-H2 and this lens?
There are little to no videos of these old Sigma EF lenses adapted onto modern Fuji bodies.
Hey, can you give me the link for that adapter? Just bought the xh2 and considering buying the Sigma 18-35mm, would be appreciated.
I first tested this lens on a Nikon D90 that I used with a 50mm f1.8D, which was already a really sharp lens. I couldn't believe how sharp it was, I still think about going back to apsc just to use this lens again, but this time with a Canon 70D or something like that for video making.
Heard a lot about this one! I've moved on to full frame but it seems like it is still good (for video at least). Very cool. However, I'd still also love to see a Tamron 17-28 2.8 review, can't imagine that hasn't popped up in the comments a lot!
It's weird he didn't make a review for that lens
Tamron still haven't got round to loaning me that one, and the hire companies don't seem to have it :-(
I have both lenses and I use for video with my a7iv the sigma have that 3d pop like the 55 1.8 from zeiss and the af works great not like the new lenses like the tamron but it can keep the subject. It struggle a bit with low contrast situations .
@@christopherfrost the thing about tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC is that it's pretty bad wide open, however when stopped down it is on par or better that the sigma 17-50, which is better wide open and thus generally liked more than the Tamron.
It would be lovely to see the VR version of tamron 17-50 retested, since it might be the best budget option for those in need for maximum sharpness and those ready to stop down for that
@@sunlbx but the sigma is not much more expensive, at max 100$ more than the tamron, so why not just get the sigma which has better sharpness at that wide aperture? and the sharpness stopped down of the tamron is not better than the sigma
Love the content bro please review the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 and the r7
Thank you very much for this video, I was interested in this lense , so I wanted to know if you have any alternative lenses which keep up with the 32.5MP for my 90D ?
Would love to see the 50-100 retested for the R7 too. If possible. Thanks Chris!
Really excellent review, Chris. I've often considered getting this adapted for my X-T4, but having seen your results I might keep my eye out for the XF 16-55 instead.
I've been using a Finger Pro II with all my Sigma lenses (10-20, 18-35, 50-100, 70-200 and 150-600c) with amazing results
@@RobertWhetton moreso for photos? If so, I'm interested. How's the autofocus on the 18-35?
I would say on the 26mp sensor, the softness will be far less of an issue. The 16-55 is great, but doesn't come close in terms of apertures, I'd recommend you go for some primes instead, if primes are workable for you. Viltrox make a good set that Chris has tested.
My first mirrorless camera was a Panasonic GH4 and then a GH5. I remember it was popular with some to use the Sigma 18-35mm on those cameras with a Metabones Speedbooster for general purpose video work and often if you asked what a good standard zoom lens would be to use on the GH4 or GH5 for video, at least one person would suggest the Sigma and a Speedbooster. I have never went down that path and have mostly stuck to native MFT lenses.
Sir, you still have photos from South Korea
I am glad to see them
I have question my sigma 18-35 when in manual focus ring is very stiff? Is this is a problem or natural?
Using this on my R6 🙌🏾
A great lens i had for quite some time on my 9 year old D5300. On the 24MP sensor image quality was very good wide open to pretty fantastic at F2.8. Especially for astrophotography a real gem as it shows very little smearing. I was only let down by it's autofocussing speed. At newer cameras it probably a lot better but on my old cam it was often quite slow and missed focus here and there. On the used market the price is also a lot lower. It can be had for under 400 Euros in good condition. The last time i looked i saw even someone selling it for 320 Euros!
Which glass is sharper on 32.5 mp ASPC cameras (90d for example): Sigma 18-35 1.8 art or Canon 16-35 2.8 III ? I've tried to find any tests on youtube, but noone did that.
This has been my go to lens on the R7, especially for video work
How is it for photography?, I do car photography and was considering this for my R7
Just bought this for canon c100 mkii. When using clog no joke....... Take picture in raw looks exactly same as video with the lens. Very sharp lens. I used canon 3ti raw and compared video on c100 mkii and sat back and said to myself when photos can match video you got something special. This lens when set right with correct exposure this lens is great. By the way quiet with continuous af in c100 mkii.
nice... I love this review...
Interesting - good review/ test but we would expect no less 😎😎😎
Have you done a review wit the Canon R7/R10 with the Sigma 35mm 1.4? I can’t find any videos on it. Do you have any or can provide a link so I can see a review??
be nice to see sigma fill in the ƒ1.8 zoom gap between the 18-35mm and 50-100mm first, thats a lens i've been wanting for a long time, 24mm/35mm-50mm ƒ1.8
one of the reasons i stuck with the M50, at 24mp its good enough, going to a 32mp+ i wonder how many of my existing ef ef/s lenses would cope with a higher grade sensor lol
Sweet, I just go this for my r7. Shutter shock is a big issues on this camera. Only in electronic i get perfect sharp shots, or if i use above 1/200 shutter speed in mechanical. Should make more videos about the shutter shock on the r7.
what wide or ultra wide angle fast lenses would you recommend for the R7?
Any recommendations of lenses, for the Canon R7?
Preferably EF mount lenses. (Cheaper)
I wish they would come out with a version 2 for mirrorless, like they did with the 85mm 1.4
i should be able to adapt to a full frame eos r camera to avoid vignetting right???
I have the lens for years now and use it on Canon 90D ; same sensor as R7, and I mean it performs far, far better than what you have demonstrated here...surprising!
Def getting this lens
Looks really big on R7, like telephoto lens. I would be curious how big would be if redesigned in style of eg. new 18-50f2.8
I love that lens
Hello Christopher! Thanks as always for the review. One question though. Why do you say it will work for 4k video recording if the sharpness is not so good on the photos? Are "just good" lenses enough for video? I´m always checking your videos for my selection of lenses, but I do just video, maybe I shouldn´t be so picky ... ?
thanks !!
Essentially yes. 4K involves far less pixels than stills at 32mp. As such, there isn't actually enough pixels to see the softness, no matter how much you drop in.
Can you do a review on the Sigma 85mm f1.4 dg hsm (non Art version) for Canon EF mount please?
I can't find any review of this lens out there.
Thank you !!!
I heard that with this lens you have to disable the R7 internal stabilisation, otherwise you have serious problems with the sensor. Do you have this problem too ?
Why is this flickering when autofocusing at 4:10 ? Is it normal ? does all mirrorless do that?
A 15-35mm f1.8 version of this would be a dream for E-mount
Hi can you also test the 50-100 f1.8 and 50-150 f2.8 on newer camera? Love to see how it will perform
You echo my thoughts on the hopes that Sigma redesigns this lens. I'd be first in line to buy
It's a fascinating lens. I originally had it on my 90d, then used it a bit on my R7. Tried it for the first time on the R6 Mark II yesterday (it automatically put it into crop mode). I need to pull out my old Rebel XT and see how it looks on it! :)
Can you still put the R6 II back into full frame with this lens attached? Canon forces APS-C lenses into crop mode but previously some Sigma DC lenses "escaped" this and could still be used on full frame.
@@synura8086 Tried it on the R6 Mark II and it forced crop mode. One thing to consider though is I have a faint memory of reading that it might be controlled by the lens firmware meaning an older firmware on the lens might give you that option. Could be worth a try. Mine is relatively new and I do not have the lens dock so not something I can test.
@@NobleEndeavours123 Thanks for your reply! Now that you mention it, I faintly remember people saying that newer firmware locked the Sigma lenses into the Canon forced crop mode. It's a shame for some special applications, like using cheap APS-C ultrawide lenses or reversed lenses on full frame.
@Noble how do you find the autofocus compares between mirrorless and DSLR for photos (through the view finder)? I'm running an 80D and whilst the 18-35 (and 50-100 Art) helped me secure some paid work, the DSLR autofocus misses regularly (even with countless firmware adjustments I've made with the USB dock). Given mirrorless cameras use a different autofocus system than DSLR, I'm hoping that an R7 will be a cheaper upgrade path than also having to replace my two Art lenses.
How did it do on the 90D? I´m thinking about buying this lens. I've heard bad things about the autofocus, though.
Nice review i have Sony a7siii i want to buy This lens is there any disadvantage for full frame and video?
Great re-test and surely the trick is to match the resolution of the lens to that of the sensor. If you have this lens on your 12-24 sensor the lens can even at full aperture give you great results on an A3 print. At higher resolution sensors it struggles but on an A3 print at a normal viewing distance (say 1.5-2x the diagonal ) I doubt anyone will be able to distinguish any difference. All you need to bear in mind is that having really high resolution sensors requires very expensive lenses and nobody will notice any difference.(forget the argument about cropping! If that matters why buy a zoom which does it for you?)
Does the ibis in the R7 work well with this lens?
Just a few hours ago I was looking into getting this for my R7... This couldn't have been better timed :)
Ignore this review and buy it. It's sharp at 2.8. Used it on my old 90d and now r7.
@@MrOranj Yeah I've been considering this again. Will save up 🙌
Also funny you replied to this now. Just a few hours ago I rewatched this video thinking if I should get it
Yes, the 32.5 mp sensor is indeed a "beast" as far as gobbling up lenses, as Christopher says. I got tired of waiting for the next "7" iteration and bought an M6 Mkii three years ago. I still love this camera, BTW, which remains extremely underrated. With the right lenses, the cropping for distance and macro work is amazing because of the sensor, and the size and weight are wonderful. I still have the 18-35 reviewed here because there really is no other comparable low-light zoom option. I would be very interested in knowing from Christopher, either posted here or in a video, which lenses he has found that do live up to the demands of the 32.5 mp sensor.
Currently really sharp on R7 are new RF L lenses like 70-200 (4 and 2.8), 135 1.8, 50 1.2, 16-35 4, 15-30 2.8 and 28-70 2.8. Old L lenses just suck on R7 (tried 70-200 2.8 non IS, 16-35 2.8 and 85 1.2. Quite new 16-35 F4 is really good, maybe newest ones like 70-200 2.8 III or 400 f4 DO could perform well too)
@@groundhoppingwlkp3622would you recommend this lens though for the price?
Would like to see a test for the sigma 14-24 2.8 for dslr. Can’t seem to find it on your channel only the new mirrorless version.
Hi Christopher, hope you're doing well. Thanks again for the great vid.
After seeing your review posted on a FB group, some users have raised some skepticism towards your testing methodology. More precisely, how shooting settings are not shared alongside the sharpness tests you provide. He mentioned that shooting the R7 in mechanical under 1/200 s could introduce shutter shock, which is absolutely true from my experience.
Do you use electronic shutter when testing lens sharpness? I recall you saying that you leave the R7 in mechanical at all times to avoid rolling shutter. I can't recall if shutter shock was mentioned in your review or not.
I personally give you the benefit of the doubt here, and from my eyes and my knowledge of what shutter shock looks like, from what I can tell this looks like a proper test and I doubt shutter shock caused any bias here. I was quick to defend you in the group, but I'm sharing this info to you just in case you did indeed forget to switch to electronic for the test.
Also, I honestly think it's not a bad idea at all to share your settings from your tests. For people who are not familiar with your channel and know how rigorous you are with your testing, I feel like this could only give you more credibility to people unfamiliar with your channel.
People like me who know about your channel know that your testing is always more than rigorous and can be trusted to the limit of the fact that only one copy is tested, but I just wanted to share this as a suggestion that might be useful to you.
Cheers!
Should I buy the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8?
I'm really thinking of buying one.
Your comments will confirm my answer.
I have the Canon 90D (32.5MP) and
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L and I
want to add a lens that covers wider angles.
Do you have other recommendations or is that the best lens for APC-S sensors like the 90Ds.
It's the largest aperture lens that I know and the build quality/design looks lovely.
I love how it looks!
I would love to hear some of your opinions/answers! :)
What kind of documentary was that in Korea? The Moonies maybe? I would love to see that. That should be fascinating. I’m sure you did as good of a job with the documentary as you do with lens reviews. Shining a light on the good and exposing the bad.
I have this on my Canon 90d . A bit heavy but always in the bag 👍
So do these results apply also to 90d? I think they share the same sensor
I own and love this lens (as well as the Sigma 30mm APC-S) but now have a full frame 6R and a Sigma 24-70 EF so I guess they are redundant (since they are the full frame equivalent of 28.8mm - 56mm, and 48mm). I used them with my Canon 7D, which produced such drastically better images and vid, it made me realize how lousy the kit lens was. But I love the 18-35mm SO MUCH that I'd almost never sell it even so!
thank you !
Will this adapt with my canon rebel t6?
I owned a R7 for a short while, but sold it back because I couldn't get on with it, though it did work well with my 18-35 sigma, there was a strange vignetting with my sigma 35mm 1.4 full frame lens which I can't explain wondered if anyone else has come across this
had that lens on my nikon Z50 miss it badly these days
if they ever make a full frame version for nikon z i would get it in a heart beat
Hey Chris, big fan of yours for over 10 years now. I like your technique in testing lens sharpness. But may I suggest, using Nikon cameras instead. My gripe with Canon is that aside from them making their own sensors, their sensors a one smaller than your standard crop 1.5 sensors (mostly Sony, only other brand is Fuji), second they still do not remove tha AA filter - I believe this is a number one factor that this lens performs a tad bit lesser in sharpness. If you look at DxoMark and compare the same lens on the Nikon mount versus the Canon mount, The Nikon mount (D7100 24MP) is able to resolve 17MP of the sensor vs the Canon mount (760D 24MP) which resolves 16MP of the total sensor resolution. Whether this difference is perceptible in real applications (I doubt it) is another questions, but in terms of pure resolution performance, I believe this lens is more capable. I wish Sony made a 32.5mp sensor with no anti aliasing to truly judge this lens in higher megapixel sensors. I do know the Tamron 85 1.8 VC is able to resolve full resolution (36MP) of the D810 and 44 MP of the D850 45MP sensor while it only resolves 38MP of the Canon 5DS R(50MP). These examples tell you the Canon sensor does have an effective resolution of a lens common to multiple eco systems.
Thank you as always, Chris. Quick question: when you zoom in to the centre or corners, what zoom level is that? 100%?
I zoom in a little further than 100% so that you can see the details a little better on TH-cam, and for consistency (i.e. I've always done that)
@@christopherfrost Thank you for the reply! That is very helpful to know, and it's reassuring that it has always been consistent.
Is there an equivalent for Full Frame? Sony A7iii with MC 11 if needed.
Could you please test the sigma 35 mm 1.4 art or for that matter the 24 mm 1.4 art on the R7. I imagine they will be vey good?
Can you make a video about the Sigma 50-100mm lens on a Canon R7 camera?
Can you please review sigma 50-150mm f/1.8 on canon eos r7?
I am looking buy if works fine.
That Canon sensor is very very hard on lenses. I had the M6 Mark ii and sold it due to issues getting super sharp images, im guessing the R7 is the same sensor.
Chris, nobody sell this lens. I finnaly managet to got one for myself almost 1.5 years ago and it's awesome. I've also tested it with a speedbooster (for video), got some issues, but it was my fault. If You're interested I can retest it on my M50 MK1 without these mistakes.
I hope you can make a retake of the Sigma 50-100mm f/1.8 with this camera.
Almost sad in a way that I decided on a used D600 instead of the Canon 80D back in 2017. This lens was right at the top of my list of ones to get.
09:39 There's a picture of my country. I am watching your review lying down after watching the World Cup Korean game. I am using this lens on Nikon d7200 and I am very satisfied.
한국이 보고싶다!