Feminism Is Designed to Make Women Miserable (Carrie Gress)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- Full Show: • The DARK TRUTH About F...
Matt Fradd asks Carrie Gress, an expert on Feminism, how she approaches women who have bought into Feminism to help them to see it is hurting them.
🍺 Get episodes a week early, 🍺 score a free PWA beer stein, and 🍺 enjoy exclusive streams with me! Become an annual supporter at mattfradd.loca...
💵 Show Sponsors:
Exodus 90: exodus90.com/matt
Hallow: hallow.com/mat...
💻 Social Media:
Facebook: / mattfradd
Instagram: / mattfradd
Twitter: / pints_w_aquinas
TikTok: / pintswithaquinas
👕 Store: shop.pintswith...
I identified as a feminist for a bit of time and oh my worddddd it was the worst time of my life. Now I want to be a trad wife and live a simple hidden life with a beautiful family.
The soundbites definition of feminism I have found is a way of explaining it's root cause:
Women felt oppressed because their role was not valued. The role of women was not valued because the family was not being valued. The family was not valued, because the culture became individualistic.
The long story goes back to a breakdown of culture after the black death, which led to liberalism and protestsntism
Spot on
It also goes back to the fall of Adam and Eve. Adam did not fulfill his duty and protect Eve from the snake thus leading the to fall. The curse of Eve is for control of her husband. Feminism is that on steroids
@@kevinpulliam3661 Some I agree with; some is feminist mythology. Feminism is largely from the lens of middle class college-educated White women who write most of the feminist literature. They also were the top leaders. Some were lesbians. Look up Kate Millet. She’s a trip.
If a woman went to college and had the money for time-saving appliances, and the kids went to school, yeah she might get a bit bored being home alone all day. Those skills might be begging for other uses. But many other women didn’t have such luxury. Also, many poorer women worked jobs and had to use old-fashioned homemaking methods.
Did the average woman think she wasn’t valued as a wife? Did the average American devalue the family on 1950 or 1960s when second wave feminism was in effect?
We also have to consider how alienating suburbs were. In the past, women could meet up and wash clothes, spin yarn or weave together. Suburban moms lived further away from each other and most households didn’t have two cars. The husband drove to work. Suburbs were a scheme to build houses, and get people to buy cars which required gasoline. Part of the reason why culture became more individualistic. Secular culture is all about the money.
I think people need really look beyond this rigid binary “oppressor / oppressed” narrative to find logistical and practical why things happened other than Men are Bad. It’s cynical and uncharitable toward men. As if men arbitrarily wanted to be mean to women. Never made laws to protect their women. That men and society didn’t value their women - or is really because they didn’t value them as men?
Mary Harrington is a great writer that really looks women’s history outside this emotive “us/them” paradigm.
Women aren’t valued today for being women but mimicking men. Both men and women can work a job but only women can turn spirit into flesh. Women today are more unhappy than women back in those horrid “oppressive times”.
What’s crazy is that modern day women don’t seem to get how feminism created the two-working spouse/parent situation. It was feminists, not men, that called women traitors to the so-called Sisterhood if they didn’t work. Actually check out the history of the feminist movement cuz there are some DARK chapters in it.
All of this is so true. I was born in 1955, went to college in the mid 70s. Was told by the feminists that I should dress more like a man to be taken seriously at work, and should work instead of homemaking, should keep working when children are born. I did all this and it was crushing.
I had my daughter at 30. I planned to return to work but my feelings of love and protection over her couldn't be squashed. I wanted to stay home with her so deeply but my husband insisted that I go back because "we needed the $$." It killed me. It ripped my heart out.
The "feminists" actually hate women. They despise our body's childbearing role, our mothering instincts, in everything that makes us feminine. They even tell us that the only thing our bodies are good for is to have sex with men who care nothing for us and whose names we don't know.
We are a wasted generation of women times 4. Hopefully, the "trad" women of today, in traditional roles and marriages, will find the deep happiness that eluded us, and which resulted in damaged children and broken marriages. God bless them.
God bless you.
So true!
As a career woman for my own reasons (not feminism) I can say truer words were never said. I often tell people that few women would be happy with my choices. I would estimate 10%. It makes me cry when I see women sacrifice their families for their careers. I think they are foolish. I will die and soon be forgotten but mothers will live on in their children. The quality of their children's lives will be a testament to their mother's love.
I don't know if things can be turned around. The cost of living is so high today and continues to get worse, that most married women have to work. Sigh. in the 1950s, a husband was able to support a wife and his kids on just his income. Today it is virtually impossible. Maybe if wages go up to match the cost of living so that it could be comparable to the way it was in the 1950s, maybe then more women would be able to be traditional wives/mothers. Unless that happens, I don't see things changing until Jesus comes back. The damage has been done. We women just have to try to do the best that we can.
We have been hearing this forever though. It’s still possible but you have to be willing to make sacrifices. My husband and I have been on 1 income for nearly 10 years now with 5 kids under 9
It's completely possible - you just have to be ok with what you can live off of. It'll be ok.
@@alqoshgirl It depends on what your husband does for a living. Your husband must make a good salary for you to afford to care for 5 kids under the age of 9. Good for you and I'm happy for you, but in the majority of women's cases today, it will not be possible. In the city where I live, we would not be able to survive. I'm glad it worked for you, but everyone's household situation is not the same.
@@kristidarby2017 It's probably possible for some, but not for most. it's definitely not possible where I live.
it absolutely is possible for most. you just have to make sacrifices that most people are not willing to make. no vacations, only one car, all homemade meals, longer commute so you can live in a cheaper area. it all seems like a lot, especially in our materialistic age, but it’s nothing compared to the duty a mother has to stay home with her children
To me (and all the women i know) feminism is about giving women the freedom to choose either work or parenthood or both, with all options being accepted by society. It's not about looking down upon parenthood, nor about enforcing working.
My sensibilities have always been on the side of freedom, but what if freedom under conditions wildly different than we evolved for result in people choosing paths that lead to unhappiness en mass? Modernity makes us crazy
Well, that is basically what feminism did. It FORCED women into the workplace. How many women do you know who can afford to stay at home and be homemakers? Very few, I'm sure.
@@babysbreath1000no there’s a lot and many who claim they can’t actually can. And no we aren’t ultra wealthy. People just make very poor financial choices and have lost the art of spending wisely
Yes, this is fantastic 🙌
@@frederickburke9944 again, if a woman is happier being a stay at home, I and any feminist i know supports that. Would love it if that were an achievable goal for anyone that wants that.
And that same sentiment I also wish for any woman that desires a full time job and no kids: a path towards that goal, and no societal stigma for doing so.
2:31 Amen
Phyllis Schlafly was right.
I had a nightmare last night that I found a bathtub full of unborn babies.
I saved some
But I could not save them all
the blue hair is not a rebelion at nature in the mind of the woman, in the mind of the woman it is a need to be different unique from everyone else and as a unique individual to be uniquely and infinately loved
edit: or they just like blue hair lol
Even if SHE thought that it always comes across as obnoxiously attention-seeking and deliberately out of place. It would be no better if a dude wore a clown costume to mass to feel “unique.” He can like clowns all he wants, but a certain decorum is expected of a person especially when they’re no longer a child, you know? I argue it’s the awareness of that decorum that makes a person dignified and the lack of it that makes them a sad case.
@@emperormiguel8327 the female mind is naturaly more self inclined than the male one, it is due to their inherant vulnerability compared to men and so they have a tendency to take care of them selves and be noticed at the same time, almost all women wear some sort of makeup and have an intrinsic want to be beautifull and if they dont have a healthy loving foundation and they find in their appearance an inadequacy then they will in some cases try to compensate by being attractive to a different more divergent and of crazy lifestyles approving demografics, what literaly every single selfindulged leftist is looking for is full love and acceptance of who they are as a person not after they submit to a social role wich they critisize. From their point of view (and that view is valid) it is a search for genuin love and affection without the need to play social mating games they seek acceptance for all chaotic elements of the human psyche they also believe them selves on the side of love and not of rules and what they percieve as artificial and therefore fake constructs. Their only flaw is that they do not see life and truth or beter yet traditional procreation as neseceary means to achieve their end goal of infinite unconditional love. So if christians were to embrace their enemies and genuenly cared for them and one another (every person being an extention of Christs sacrifitial love) then the world would be a better place without any room for diabolical disorientation.
They’re rebelling against the God given nature of their being. Which leads to misery.
@@ThePostmillennial thanks to original sin we are all born departed from God they are just looking for awncers in the wrong neighbourhood
@@jokerguycz I agree. We’re all rebelling against God until we’re not.
Is Bill Gates fascinated by weird tornadoes? The Bible predicted all of that (Sermon on the Mount ... "signs and wonders from false prophets") and I have provided the scientific rationale. A very gifted psychic (prophet) is getting progressively better at time-warping resulting in huge energy disruptions.
The only decent interactions with women I've has in the last 5 years was with ones that are already married.
If she is single past 27, there's something wrong with her.
That’s absurd. Lila Rose got married passed 30. Stephanie Gray was in her end 30’s. I happen to have been lucky and met my husband relatively young. But the far majority of men are trash. It’s hard to find a virtuous good man. Men like my husband are rare. I would’ve never settled for anything less
This is theost ridiculous claim i have heard in awhile.
Feminism makes women miserable… fact
Feminists are miserable. Fact
Make a rebuttal
Did you listen to it? The women who try to live completely independant lives are miserable and don't know why. There are very few feminist advocates I'm aware of that seem genuinely fulfilled or at peace with their lives. They are usually angry and restless and even self-destructive.
Men and women *need* each other. Even the men who think they don't need women are ultimately miserable and resentful and have more often than not suffered some sort of betrayal or trauma to make them think that way. Men and women needing each other is so ingrained in our species that you literally need both male and female to even create a new person in the first place. To try to divorce the two sexes is depriving them of invaluable support.
And this is the comment with "theost" spelling I've seen in "awhile"